People who want sharia law should live in a sharia law country all these people should live by the laws of the country they live in why do they want to live here. Britain really caved in by allowing sharia law courts and Muslim sections. All these non war torn countries didint start out with sharia law and that's what made them great. No matter what country you go to once sharia law is in it. all You see is war and hate and crime and destruction.
+danielewernfield87 You have not studied Islam enough. It is a religious OBLIGATION to spread Islam. It isn't a choice. It is MANDATORY. Most Muslims don't even know their own religion. If you'd like to understand Islam, you need to study the quran/hadith and everything that Mo did. I wouldn't wish that on you, because the quran is full of 100% SHIT. Instead, if you are interested, do a TH-cam search of "Islam, What the West Needs to Know. It is a long documentary (1H38M). But you will learn all that you need in order to understand Islam. Trust me, the Media and Western politicians are playing a deadly PC game with this CULT. Only Geert Wilders understands the situation. Hopefully Trump won't waffle on this important topic. War is coming this century (Freedom VS Islam)
The goal of their religion is to take over by spreading their ideologies, they don't want to go back. They disguise themselves as being peaceful but they support hatred.
Zoe TheCat - I realize this is an old thread, but this topic is no less important today than it was three years ago. You mentioned "Most Muslims don't even know their own religion". If you are correct, then I'd like to suggest the possibility that the majority of Muslims are, therefore, also unaware that spreading their religion is mandatory. Nor are the majority in agreement with killing those unwilling to convert, even if they are aware of such commands. As a Christian, I am aware that my own Holy Book commands we spread "the gospel" to all the inhabitants of the earth. This has, at times, been accomplished through violent means, even in relatively modern times, especially by those fighting a war against abortionists. Our Old Testament is full of religious wars in which believers are commanded to destroy gentile nations and to tear down their false idols. If the women and children were not also murdered, they were taken as slaves. People were stoned to death for having sex outside of wedlock, and women were made to drink poison to discover whether or not they'd been unfaithful (an aborted baby proof of unfairhfulness). I don't think most Christians are even aware the Israelites had slaves beyond "indentured servants". While many consider these things the "old law", I have personally known some who strongly believe Christ did not do away with such things and we should still be following OT laws today. One can no more judge a non-radical Muslim by their religion's ancient writings than we can rightly judge a non-radical Jew or Christian by our own. While there are some radical Christians, just as there are radical Muslims, each person should be judged as an individual. I accept there may be more, or at least more powerful radicalized groups, among Muslims. However, some hold to no religion at all, some are Christian, and so many of those seeking asylum are victims of war torn areas in which the radicals have forced their extremism upon people who do not agree. These people are the victims of a shared enemy and are in need of our protection. If radical Christians took over our country, if our children had to live in fear of being stoned to death or women were again treated as legal property, I would hope for similar understang and protections rather than fear-based, sweeping, condemnation. I am not accusing you of this, just making a point I believe worth consideration.
Zoe TheCat - I realize this is an old thread, but this topic is no less important today than it was three years ago. You mentioned "Most Muslims don't even know their own religion". If you are correct, then I'd like to suggest the possibility that the majority of Muslims are, therefore, also unaware that spreading their religion is mandatory. Nor are the majority in agreement with killing those unwilling to convert, even if they are aware of such commands. As a Christian, I am aware that my own Holy Book commands we spread "the gospel" to all the inhabitants of the earth. This has, at times, been accomplished through violent means, even in relatively modern times, especially by those fighting a war against abortionists. Our Old Testament is full of religious wars in which believers are commanded to destroy gentile nations and to tear down their false idols. If the women and children were not also murdered, they were taken as slaves. People were stoned to death for having sex outside of wedlock, and women were made to drink poison to discover whether or not they'd been unfaithful (an aborted baby proof of unfairhfulness). I don't think most Christians today are even aware the Israelites owned slaves beyond indentured servitude as part of paying off debt. While many consider these things the "old law", I have personally known some who strongly believe Christ did not do away with such things, and we should still be following OT laws today. Of course, I strongly disagree. One can no more judge a non-radical Muslim by their religion's ancient writings than we can rightly judge a non-radical Jew or Christian by our own. I accept there may be more, or at least more powerful radicalized groups, among Muslims. However, some hold to no religion at all, some are Christian, and so many of those seeking asylum are victims of war torn areas in which the radicals have forced their extremism upon people who do not agree. These people are the victims of a shared enemy and are in need of our protection. If radical Christians took over our country, if our children had to live in fear of being stoned to death or women were again treated as legal property, I would hope for similar understang and protections rather than fear-based, sweeping, condemnation. I am not accusing you of this, just making a point I believe worth consideration.
Jewel Frey difference would be that any Christian worth their salt know that Jesus came and fulfilled the law for us and that the OT had way different circumstances. Jesus never demanded for us to kill people only men did that if radical Christians took over and started stoning people they wouldn’t be Christians we are called to give our lives in service to God not to cease power over others. Islam on the other hand demands submission or death of all infidels. Also not all Muslims are Islamist stop conflating the two one is a race the other a religion of hate and intolerance. Finally like David Horowitz says all the time most believers of Islam may not be out killing people but most of the support it and vote in people who push it forward. You are either naive and ignorant or misleading people with two faced words.
Why? Look up the footage of Milo Yionappolous at Berkeley. College students are being indoctrinated into hating America thus hating anyone who is pro America/Capitalism. Countless free speech events have been shut down due to threats of rioting and violence solely because the speaker was conservative and speaking, with facts, against their leftist agenda. This is the new fascist movement in America. The funniest part?- these people who shut down free speech claim they are anti fascists. That’s how ridiculous they are.
***** opp now i know why anyone who uses bhruh in a sentence is either a fuckin punk as child or half grown nigga which one are ya? common man you can do better than that cant ya? adhering to convo releases asus3571 from all liability if tlinx21fan hangs himself because he doesnt know who he's talking to...
This guy has balls made out of inconel. Thank the Lord for David Horowitz. He used to work for the other side... Back when he was young and strong and ignorant, thus co-opted. 🙄
I couldn't even focus on what Horowitz was saying in this video because I was completely distracted by that horrifying red haired creature in the middle of the room wearing some kind of fur (a trophy of it's last slaughter?!) around it's neck. This thing needs to be found and contained, immediately!
You're too bias ,cause if you weren't you'd knew Israel withdrew from gaza 10 years ago no troops there and we got a lil hammastan ,the west bank has autonomy except the zones close to Israeli lands (defensible borders ) and for east Jerusalem it was taken from the jordanians in 6 days war.
3:117 O you who believe, take not for intimate friends others than your own people: They (others) spare no pains to cause you loss. They love that which distresses you. Vehement hatred has ALREADY appeared from out of their mouths, and that which their hearts conceal is greater still. Indeed We have made the messages clear to you, IF you understand. 24:47 And they say: We believe in God (Allah) and in the Messenger and we obey; then a party of them turn away after this, and they are NOT believers. (They are liars)
Alright, so is it just me? This guy is on the right side of shit, generally, but I don't think he's a bright guy. I could have utterly destroyed the hippie and the sorab chick from the two videos I saw earlier. Guerilla warfare is not inherently evil, why the fuck would he say that? Guerilla tactics and conventional warfare are only as just as the desired ends of said warfare. The manner with which one kills combatants is of no regard;; defeating the enemy is the only goal.
Desey Desey, you are using the deceptive tactics of Leftism to shut down the value of Horowitz’s message. You would be better to simply say you agree with Hamas killing Jews and disagree with Horowitz. As it is, you are using a stock boilerplate Leftist method to use totalitarian control over a person using Free Speech.
alpsalish Understand that a fact is an observation. A quote may be an observation, or an opinion. A hard fact is 3 or more observations that are the same but from 3 different individuals. David has the right to name a quote an opinion or an observation, a fact. Some people confuse a fact with a truth. So, he will not use the word “fact”. By saying the man has an opinion, he is implying the man does not have either a hard fact or a truth.
![เขามัทรี - เอ็กซ์ ศุภกฤต - จอนนี่มิวสิค [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AS9ufKuQIVs/mqdefault.jpg)
GOD BLEES YOU BROTHER DAVID HOROWITZ
I love how he shuts down the Muslim agenda. He is amazing!
People who want sharia law should live in a sharia law country
all these people should live by the laws of the country they live in
why do they want to live here. Britain really caved in by allowing
sharia law courts and Muslim sections. All these non war torn countries
didint start out with sharia law and that's what made them great.
No matter what country you go to once sharia law is in it. all You
see is war and hate and crime and destruction.
+danielewernfield87 You have not studied Islam enough. It is a religious OBLIGATION to spread Islam. It isn't a choice. It is MANDATORY. Most Muslims don't even know their own religion. If you'd like to understand Islam, you need to study the quran/hadith and everything that Mo did. I wouldn't wish that on you, because the quran is full of 100% SHIT. Instead, if you are interested, do a TH-cam search of "Islam, What the West Needs to Know. It is a long documentary (1H38M). But you will learn all that you need in order to understand Islam. Trust me, the Media and Western politicians are playing a deadly PC game with this CULT. Only Geert Wilders understands the situation. Hopefully Trump won't waffle on this important topic. War is coming this century (Freedom VS Islam)
The goal of their religion is to take over by spreading their ideologies, they don't want to go back. They disguise themselves as being peaceful but they support hatred.
Zoe TheCat - I realize this is an old thread, but this topic is no less important today than it was three years ago. You mentioned "Most Muslims don't even know their own religion". If you are correct, then I'd like to suggest the possibility that the majority of Muslims are, therefore, also unaware that spreading their religion is mandatory. Nor are the majority in agreement with killing those unwilling to convert, even if they are aware of such commands. As a Christian, I am aware that my own Holy Book commands we spread "the gospel" to all the inhabitants of the earth. This has, at times, been accomplished through violent means, even in relatively modern times, especially by those fighting a war against abortionists. Our Old Testament is full of religious wars in which believers are commanded to destroy gentile nations and to tear down their false idols. If the women and children were not also murdered, they were taken as slaves. People were stoned to death for having sex outside of wedlock, and women were made to drink poison to discover whether or not they'd been unfaithful (an aborted baby proof of unfairhfulness). I don't think most Christians are even aware the Israelites had slaves beyond "indentured servants". While many consider these things the "old law", I have personally known some who strongly believe Christ did not do away with such things and we should still be following OT laws today. One can no more judge a non-radical Muslim by their religion's ancient writings than we can rightly judge a non-radical Jew or Christian by our own. While there are some radical Christians, just as there are radical Muslims, each person should be judged as an individual. I accept there may be more, or at least more powerful radicalized groups, among Muslims. However, some hold to no religion at all, some are Christian, and so many of those seeking asylum are victims of war torn areas in which the radicals have forced their extremism upon people who do not agree. These people are the victims of a shared enemy and are in need of our protection. If radical Christians took over our country, if our children had to live in fear of being stoned to death or women were again treated as legal property, I would hope for similar understang and protections rather than fear-based, sweeping, condemnation. I am not accusing you of this, just making a point I believe worth consideration.
Zoe TheCat - I realize this is an old thread, but this topic is no less important today than it was three years ago. You mentioned "Most Muslims don't even know their own religion". If you are correct, then I'd like to suggest the possibility that the majority of Muslims are, therefore, also unaware that spreading their religion is mandatory. Nor are the majority in agreement with killing those unwilling to convert, even if they are aware of such commands. As a Christian, I am aware that my own Holy Book commands we spread "the gospel" to all the inhabitants of the earth. This has, at times, been accomplished through violent means, even in relatively modern times, especially by those fighting a war against abortionists. Our Old Testament is full of religious wars in which believers are commanded to destroy gentile nations and to tear down their false idols. If the women and children were not also murdered, they were taken as slaves. People were stoned to death for having sex outside of wedlock, and women were made to drink poison to discover whether or not they'd been unfaithful (an aborted baby proof of unfairhfulness). I don't think most Christians today are even aware the Israelites owned slaves beyond indentured servitude as part of paying off debt. While many consider these things the "old law", I have personally known some who strongly believe Christ did not do away with such things, and we should still be following OT laws today. Of course, I strongly disagree. One can no more judge a non-radical Muslim by their religion's ancient writings than we can rightly judge a non-radical Jew or Christian by our own. I accept there may be more, or at least more powerful radicalized groups, among Muslims. However, some hold to no religion at all, some are Christian, and so many of those seeking asylum are victims of war torn areas in which the radicals have forced their extremism upon people who do not agree. These people are the victims of a shared enemy and are in need of our protection. If radical Christians took over our country, if our children had to live in fear of being stoned to death or women were again treated as legal property, I would hope for similar understang and protections rather than fear-based, sweeping, condemnation. I am not accusing you of this, just making a point I believe worth consideration.
Jewel Frey difference would be that any Christian worth their salt know that Jesus came and fulfilled the law for us and that the OT had way different circumstances. Jesus never demanded for us to kill people only men did that if radical Christians took over and started stoning people they wouldn’t be Christians we are called to give our lives in service to God not to cease power over others. Islam on the other hand demands submission or death of all infidels. Also not all Muslims are Islamist stop conflating the two one is a race the other a religion of hate and intolerance. Finally like David Horowitz says all the time most believers of Islam may not be out killing people but most of the support it and vote in people who push it forward. You are either naive and ignorant or misleading people with two faced words.
I love this guy, he's so right!
David Horowitz is a legend.
David Horowitz is a national hero.
David keep up the good work. Do you have your own channel? I can't find it.
Why does everyone in that room look like the people from idiocracy
Because they are
Anderson Cooper?? Zero credibility. Absolutely.
Why does Horowitz always need police and a bodyguard inside his talks?
to make the irrationals think twice whether they fully understand what is saying or not
Why? Look up the footage of Milo Yionappolous at Berkeley.
College students are being indoctrinated into hating America thus hating anyone who is pro America/Capitalism. Countless free speech events have been shut down due to threats of rioting and violence solely because the speaker was conservative and speaking, with facts, against their leftist agenda. This is the new fascist movement in America. The funniest part?- these people who shut down free speech claim they are anti fascists. That’s how ridiculous they are.
Clever man,I'm a Muslim and I like you...
Do you condemn Hamas?
lol u r not a muslim if u support this evil j3w
@@motorheadbanger90 If that girl was not on a watch list, then someone isn't doing their job.
No one has the right to dictate over anyone. Only the law of nature should rule on earth not man made laws
So rude. No texting when someone is speaking!
I denounce the murder of any one
totally agree
***** opp now i know why anyone who uses bhruh in a sentence is either a fuckin punk as child or half grown nigga which one are ya? common man you can do better than that cant ya? adhering to convo releases asus3571 from all liability if tlinx21fan hangs himself because he doesnt know who he's talking to...
s21411 try me corky
Hasnahirish Abdullah not worth the breath
Does anyone have further information on Walid Shoebat? I watched the Anderson Cooper special on him and am not sure what to make of the whole thing.
This guy has balls made out of inconel. Thank the Lord for David Horowitz. He used to work for the other side... Back when he was young and strong and ignorant, thus co-opted. 🙄
Which gives him enormous credibility!
He walks forwards and backwards a lot...
Hahaha this is hilarious! If you use 'The Internet' as a source, you need to rethink your legitimacy.
You can see how David obfuscates and lies .. he calls the comments “ your opinion” and silences the questioner, when he says he has facts.
If they made a movie about this man I could totally see him being played by Mandy Patinkin. *respond down below if you agree or not.
I couldn't even focus on what Horowitz was saying in this video because I was completely distracted by that horrifying red haired creature in the middle of the room wearing some kind of fur (a trophy of it's last slaughter?!) around it's neck. This thing needs to be found and contained, immediately!
***** Stop blamming Israel for HAMAS's warcrimes!
***** no but the PLO was.
***** two forces fight , one victorious the second defeated so who of them has the right for the land ???
You're too bias ,cause if you weren't you'd knew Israel withdrew from gaza 10 years ago no troops there and we got a lil hammastan ,the west bank has autonomy except the zones close to Israeli lands (defensible borders ) and for east Jerusalem it was taken from the jordanians in 6 days war.
Ha , you can't see the truth even when its in front of yours eyes ...I'm don't talking to you mindless drone .
horowitz has balls. thank God he's out there in the belly of the beast. odumbo is continuing to back isis and condemn our ally Israel.
3:117 O you who believe, take not for intimate friends others than your
own people: They (others) spare no pains to cause you loss. They love
that which distresses you. Vehement hatred has ALREADY appeared from out
of their mouths, and that which their hearts conceal is greater still.
Indeed We have made the messages clear to you, IF you understand.
24:47 And they say: We believe in God (Allah) and in the Messenger and we obey; then a party of them turn away after this, and they are NOT believers. (They are liars)
Phan
you're just a conspiracy theorist samlex
Mt
Alright, so is it just me? This guy is on the right side of shit, generally, but I don't think he's a bright guy.
I could have utterly destroyed the hippie and the sorab chick from the two videos I saw earlier. Guerilla warfare is not inherently evil, why the fuck would he say that? Guerilla tactics and conventional warfare are only as just as the desired ends of said warfare. The manner with which one kills combatants is of no regard;; defeating the enemy is the only goal.
Chods
This nut is crazy. He could run for President and win, no problem, hands down.
I can't stand listening to this jew. I'm out of here.
Can't accept the truth bottom boy?
+Peter Hunsader what you don't like the truth bitch
Truth hurts all who hate the Truth.
He is a evil and hate monger. It's an insult to invite him or to listen to his biased and hateful views.
Desey Desey, you are using the deceptive tactics of Leftism to shut down the value of Horowitz’s message. You would be better to simply say you agree with Hamas killing Jews and disagree with Horowitz. As it is, you are using a stock boilerplate Leftist method to use totalitarian control over a person using Free Speech.
Truth hurts all who hate the Truth
David, David, David. You can not label quoted individuals as simply one's opinions. They are quotes! My the debating skills are lacking in this video.
alpsalish Understand that a fact is an observation. A quote may be an observation, or an opinion. A hard fact is 3 or more observations that are the same but from 3 different individuals. David has the right to name a quote an opinion or an observation, a fact. Some people confuse a fact with a truth. So, he will not use the word “fact”.
By saying the man has an opinion, he is implying the man does not have either a hard fact or a truth.
Is it not possible to hate both horowitz AND Islam? because thats how I feel?