wow, nach dem kurzen part über genozid am ende war ich sehr überrascht das veröffentlichungsdatum zu sehen. hatte legit kurz gänsehaut. es haut mich immer wieder um, wenn ich ältere philosophInnen neu kennenlerne, wie brandaktuell und zutreffend ihre theorien oftmals sind.
Very enlightening summary. But it should be noted that postmodernists wrongly interpreted the situation of capitalism through the lenses of modernism, which they were all against in one sense or another. The most famous one, Foucoult, once said that if he had read the Frankfurt School, he would not have written 90% of his works. I say in my book "Digitalism vs. Capitalism" that if he had read McLuhan, he wouldn't bother to write the remaining 10%. The real basis for their wrongness is that technology determines everything. In fact, what they refer to as social determination is nonsense. because without technological infrastructure, society could not survive. Read Harold Innis. To the question, "Where is capitalism coming and going? Going to its graveyard?" I have a hopeful answer, which is highlighted in my book: Digitalism is killing capitalism. A novel perspective, a suggestion first in the world! “Digitalism vs. Capitalism: The New Ecumenical World Order: The Dimensions of State in Digitalism” by Veysel Batmaz is available for sale on the Internet.
@@taylorbowles5183 Yes, you are right. But partly. I call Frankfurt School a "shy" technological determinist because of Adorno's "culture industry" theory. A little bit far from Frankfurt School but close enough, Benjamin's "art in the age of mechanical reproduction." In both cases, whatever they are discussing is determined by technology, as they accept very bluntly.
wow, nach dem kurzen part über genozid am ende war ich sehr überrascht das veröffentlichungsdatum zu sehen. hatte legit kurz gänsehaut. es haut mich immer wieder um, wenn ich ältere philosophInnen neu kennenlerne, wie brandaktuell und zutreffend ihre theorien oftmals sind.
Excellent summary
Great vid 🫡
“It is like playing puppets but with extra steps” 😂😂😂
Subscribed as a student
Great video. Informative and made me laugh out loud.
Thanks man.. was really helpful
Very enlightening summary. But it should be noted that postmodernists wrongly interpreted the situation of capitalism through the lenses of modernism, which they were all against in one sense or another. The most famous one, Foucoult, once said that if he had read the Frankfurt School, he would not have written 90% of his works. I say in my book "Digitalism vs. Capitalism" that if he had read McLuhan, he wouldn't bother to write the remaining 10%. The real basis for their wrongness is that technology determines everything. In fact, what they refer to as social determination is nonsense. because without technological infrastructure, society could not survive. Read Harold Innis. To the question, "Where is capitalism coming and going? Going to its graveyard?" I have a hopeful answer, which is highlighted in my book: Digitalism is killing capitalism. A novel perspective, a suggestion first in the world! “Digitalism vs. Capitalism: The New Ecumenical World Order: The Dimensions of State in Digitalism” by Veysel Batmaz is available for sale on the Internet.
Very interesting but you have it wrong about the Frankfurt school. They are not technological determinants in the slightest
@@taylorbowles5183 Yes, you are right. But partly. I call Frankfurt School a "shy" technological determinist because of Adorno's "culture industry" theory. A little bit far from Frankfurt School but close enough, Benjamin's "art in the age of mechanical reproduction." In both cases, whatever they are discussing is determined by technology, as they accept very bluntly.
Thank you!
great work!
Based
hi