EGYPTIAN GOD SLIFER! OBELISK! AND RA! DECK PROFILE (SEPTEMBER 2021) YUGIOH!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 83

  • @DarkArmedDuelist
    @DarkArmedDuelist  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey guys! Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe! Also check out the Patreon in the description for those awesome rewards!!

    • @cassidysippel9684
      @cassidysippel9684 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you going to do test Hands with this deck mate If not it's fine

    • @TheJunk2
      @TheJunk2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please test hand and combo the stardust dragon deck

  • @kennynguyen5248
    @kennynguyen5248 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    This deck really need mound of the bound creator. In today's yugioh its super easy to out a God which you spent so much to get out onto the field. Giving it protection is a much needed insurance .

  • @unamusedrowlett6303
    @unamusedrowlett6303 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    feel like having triple spheres is a must for this. having an in archetype kaiju is too good to pass up

  • @FBI-ju5no
    @FBI-ju5no 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Had this one kid fail to break past Egyptian god slime, while I'm sitting there with Obelisk and Reactor Slime, clearing his field every turn, with FOF face down.
    It was fun.

    • @v257to
      @v257to 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Did you laugh like marik during this duel? 😂

    • @FBI-ju5no
      @FBI-ju5no 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@v257to
      Not going to lie, I was sorely tempted.

  • @vexser6370
    @vexser6370 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The heavens twist and thunder roars, signalizing the coming of this ancient creature, and the dawn of true power. I summon Slifer The Sky Dragon!

  • @thetruedaoster8863
    @thetruedaoster8863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The true deck of the Pharaoh!
    Wielding the power of the three Divine Beasts
    There are few other cards that can power bestow
    As they unleash their rage upon those oppressing the least

  • @TKHedgeHog
    @TKHedgeHog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wonder if DaD will ever make Character Role-playing Deck Profiles, it Sounds pretty cool.

  • @Super-qr7wm
    @Super-qr7wm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    as someone who runs a pure egyptian god and gets a good amount of wins ill write down all the things i dissagree with:
    obelisk and slifer should be bumped up to 2 and ra should stay to one
    You should have more then one sphere mode
    run immortal phoenix its pretty good when your ra gets outpowered or if you used sphere mode
    maybe invest in some kaijus for extra summons
    ultimate divine beast isnt that great because if you do have a god on your field its a good field wipe and fodder but it requires to have a god in the graveyard which isnt common because in this deck you are lucky to have one it seems
    link black luster soldier wont be used because you will be using your gods
    pentestag is worthless because your link black luster will become a boss monster if you have it
    recommend using utopic dark infinity because it has heals
    also recommend using level 4 xyzs as well because if you cant get out your egyptian gods for what ever reason atleast you can get an alright monster
    play mystical space typhoon to destroy your own field space and get a free god card
    try to lower the amount of xyz monsters that are level 10 as the super dreadnaughts are good but the ravenous whatever isnt a good game ender its just some chip damage
    maybe use 2 thunder force attacks because it makes slifer a menace
    use obelisks trap card soul energy max because its just alot better
    maybe use foolish burial goods as ancient chant cna give an extra normal summon
    bump soul crossing down to 2 because while its a good card in general it takes out your god card which can be a pain
    didnt even realise RUN MOUND OF THE BOUND CREATOR it protects your gods and if it gets negated and destroyed its a free god and run terraforming with it too even if it makes your deck go to 41 you always run this card
    this was what i disaggreed with

    • @Hishi786
      @Hishi786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Could you send your decklist please so i can compare the differences?

    • @Super-qr7wm
      @Super-qr7wm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Hishi786 cant really be assed and also that as when i was tired however i will correct some possible mistakes i may have made
      Try to run as little of each god as possible without making it impossible to get because ra is easy to get out but obelisk and slifer(arguably the best gods) arent easy to get out even with ra support
      Becareful with the amount of gods you have and most likely even sphere modes you can cause bricks(which ive seen a good few times in my few duels) which is sad but it is what it is
      Run some link monsters focused on negates because they can really save your ass

  • @taxevasion2623
    @taxevasion2623 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why do you have the foolish burial? You don't have immortal Phoenix, what else would I want to send to the graveyard?

  • @thetruemarkgaming7584
    @thetruemarkgaming7584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    No mound of the bound creator package though? I would think the gods would want protection

  • @bloodarcher7841
    @bloodarcher7841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks buddy for the amazing deck profile. My favorite God card is Obilisk just his style and effects. Eons ago I made a deck with him using frogs. Also some monarches and Jinzo. People never saw it coming.
    I recommend looking into a list I used to win locals years back. Frog exodia 🤣

  • @nftw95
    @nftw95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This might be one of the most expensive decks out there and one of easiest to beat. Such a shame, I really thought structure decks would give them power like sacred beast one, but no they released a 2008 structure deck.

    • @Alex1900vfl
      @Alex1900vfl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agree. The only realy good card, that makes this Deck playable, is Soul Crossing. Tributing up to 3 opponent monsters, to interrupt his combos and summon an own "Boss-Monster" with high attack or an relatively good "floodgate" like effect like Slifers, is not that bad.

    • @nftw95
      @nftw95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Obsessivefanboy Right. More like a starter deck.

    • @steakfries8037
      @steakfries8037 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's says "structure deck" on the back of the box. But it's small and easy to miss. Almost like they were ashamed to call it a structure deck. 😕

    • @nftw95
      @nftw95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@steakfries8037 Did not know that since I didnt buy it. I cancelled my pre-order when I saw the deck list.

    • @steakfries8037
      @steakfries8037 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nftw95 I don't blame you. Both decks are trash, but I didn't expect them to be good anyway. I got them purely for nostalgia. And now I have 3 different arts for slifer and obelisk.

  • @thetruedaoster8863
    @thetruedaoster8863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Card Advance is an amazing card when followed up with 'Atem', I mean The True Name
    Kaiba: The True Name? What in the world is that?

  • @calebwhite9540
    @calebwhite9540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The angel 01 bricks a lot in test hands, take it down to 2 and and an immortal Phoenix. The true name, card advance combo is consistent, and essentially gives you 4 foolish burials for Phoenix. Since you’re running 2 Ra’s anyway it’s solid.

  • @aurel3596
    @aurel3596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Will you ever do a new teledad deck profile since teleport is now at 2 copies?

  • @ZEDEX252
    @ZEDEX252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes! I've been waiting for this one

  • @shirothegamer7574
    @shirothegamer7574 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I used to own all three god cards when i was a kid. They burned in a fire.

  • @Do3n1ow
    @Do3n1ow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was looking for one of these not to long ago

  • @thetruedaoster8863
    @thetruedaoster8863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the deck profile, DAD - or perhaps I should call it my next shopping list...?

  • @calebstark946
    @calebstark946 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could we get some test hands? I would love to see how the deck plays.

  • @JesseNightingale
    @JesseNightingale 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I still dont get why Ra can't be special summoned even though that's literally how it was mainly used by Marik lol

    • @somerandom2217
      @somerandom2217 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well i still wonder that as well but i assume its probably cuz you can special summon it and get alot of pops on the board...probably

    • @Zarkaithnia
      @Zarkaithnia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because Konami is lame and keeps show effects separate from the actual cards...

  • @Megidramon
    @Megidramon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No Immortal Phoenix? But why?

  • @chrisstich5573
    @chrisstich5573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cards can't be reacted to negate the summon but other effects can go off

  • @michaellancia45
    @michaellancia45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The OCG brought in Don Thousands Number 1000 and iC1000 and the support cards used to summon his ace monster, if those cars are brought into the TCG would you be interested in doing a deck profile of the Number 1000

  • @trayvonsamuel115
    @trayvonsamuel115 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video

  • @corispeed1635
    @corispeed1635 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What about the winged dragon of Ra immortal Phenix

  • @CyberBlade01
    @CyberBlade01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GREAT DECK playing master duels it has a 75% win chance my best deck that has the same states is zombie horde which some of the place make people surrender the game. Great work 👏

    • @DarkArmedDuelist
      @DarkArmedDuelist  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I'm glad this deck has been working out for you! Keep it up dude!

  • @zacharyjoy8724
    @zacharyjoy8724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Too bad Ra doesn’t have “his” own structure deck yet. The others do, and they’re pretty cool. Makes me wonder what the Ra deck might look like.
    Oh, and speaking of structure decks, I know I asked before, but I’m doing it again, just in case. When Cyber Strike comes out next month, will you please make a new deck based on its contents (which I believe are Cyberdark with Cyber Dragon support)? I especially ask because I pre-ordered a set of three, and I want to see what you do. You are, after all, my go-to guy for deck building.

    • @Alex1900vfl
      @Alex1900vfl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think that Ra doesn't get a Structure, because he got his support in his own Booster Set and has a bit more as the others even after the Slifer and Obelisk Structures

    • @zacharyjoy8724
      @zacharyjoy8724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Alex1900vfl Ah! I suppose that’s fair enough.

    • @nicholasfarrell5981
      @nicholasfarrell5981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@zacharyjoy8724 I'd like to see DAD make a Cyber/Cyberdark deck, since I'm planning on getting three of the structure deck (both for Infinite Impermanence and to build a Zane theme deck) and want to see how he builds them as a base.

    • @zacharyjoy8724
      @zacharyjoy8724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nicholasfarrell5981 Me, too, more or less. With new support, why shouldn’t Hell Kaiser make a comeback?

  • @rjcarrabello6283
    @rjcarrabello6283 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where is the stardust dragon synchro test hands video?

  • @Colin29300
    @Colin29300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Already made this deck 4 months ago bought all cards separately

  • @michaellancia45
    @michaellancia45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve been using your Slifer the sky dragon/Numeron deck that you made 2 months ago and I it’s still a really good deck however I’ve been winning mostly with the numeron cards and not really with slifer

    • @nicholasfarrell5981
      @nicholasfarrell5981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you want to make Slifer the main focus of your deck, try it with Face Card Knights. Their recycling effects on their spell/trap cards are hilarious with Slifer.

  • @NerineArima
    @NerineArima 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am curious how well this does against other decks. I would like to see a match with drytron, exodia lock, and ice barrier. 🤔

  • @GuardianGrarl
    @GuardianGrarl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazoness next :)

  • @tempflidominic808
    @tempflidominic808 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    test hands pls

  • @LazyNinjass
    @LazyNinjass 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For a future live duel video 🤔

  • @rafaelmarquez4985
    @rafaelmarquez4985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    four dimension dragons deck profile 2021

  • @shadowphenix1991
    @shadowphenix1991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Roughly what's the price range on this deck?

    • @kennynguyen5248
      @kennynguyen5248 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's expensive. The main deck is roughly around 70-90 could be more depending on tcg prices that Flux everyday. It's that extra deck that will cost well above 300.

  • @andrewlin6189
    @andrewlin6189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's ridiculous how expensive guardian slime is. Over 40 dollars since the last time I checked.

    • @animemaster2400
      @animemaster2400 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not just Guardian Slime. Ancient Chant goes for almost $70. At this point, it's best to just wait for a reprint so that the price can drop.

    • @andrewlin6189
      @andrewlin6189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@animemaster2400 Wow. 70. I wouldn’t be surprised if it got a reprint in brothers of legend though.

    • @michaelzaccardo1010
      @michaelzaccardo1010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@animemaster2400 where are you checking Ancient Chant that it's $70? Most of the ones on TCGplayer are like $35.

    • @bloodarcher7841
      @bloodarcher7841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Really??! I got my two copies for 8$ each long ago. Wow

    • @andrewlin6189
      @andrewlin6189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelzaccardo1010 yeah I didn’t remember them to be that expensive. Maybe troll and toad as the ones on there are always overpriced.

  • @andrewlin6189
    @andrewlin6189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wait why Tellus?
    If it was a level one then it might be good as it has to leave the field to gain most of its advantage.

    • @DarkArmedDuelist
      @DarkArmedDuelist  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I explained in the video about that. All you need is to link into the salamangreat rabbit and your good.

    • @andrewlin6189
      @andrewlin6189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DarkArmedDuelist I skimmed through it.

  • @XxThePrinceOfDemonxX
    @XxThePrinceOfDemonxX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    no place for "divine evolution"??? :c

  • @Papulince-gs5tm
    @Papulince-gs5tm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    llege temprano

  • @astdbaddie2439
    @astdbaddie2439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so we gonna ignore how theres only 37 cards in his deck

    • @DarkArmedDuelist
      @DarkArmedDuelist  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Might wanna recount that one. It's 40 I just counted.

    • @astdbaddie2439
      @astdbaddie2439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DarkArmedDuelist ok

  • @UnnamedHero0922
    @UnnamedHero0922 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like my version better