Fabulous. Stood after steering watch a few times on tin cans in the 70’s.....small brass wheel about the size of a dinner plate. Compass repeater in front of you. Was cool to think ‘Wow I’m steering a 300 ft. Destroyer from its ass end and I can’t see a damn thing.....’ lol
@@HighlandLaddie really? So Canada has a few ww1 battle ships? Wow never heard about them before plus if I remember correctly the only UK made ww1 battle ship left is in Japan! From what I've heard the UK scrapped all of its old battle ships! So please start naming these ww1 and ww2 battleships that you say exist because we would like to visit them? Well we are waiting?????
Great videos, keep up the good work! After watching all of Ryan Szimanski's videos from Battleship New Jersey, I was hoping to see similar videos of the Texas, and these are great
These are much more informative than Ryan's are. Ryan's video's mostly stay focused on his face and never really show us much of nothing. His later video's have gotten better I have to admit but Tom Scott video's are better.
Difference is Tom focuses solely on hardcore USS Texas information. Ryan focuses on playing with LEGO blocks and never does first person views like this of the areas off limits to visitors.
I wish I could hit the lottery and spend the rest of my life learning about her and volunteering to keep her around. Your walk through are crazy informative. Please keep doing this!!
Lottory is a joke. Why do people always go on about "if I won the lottery" anyone can become wealthy by investing money smartly. Understand the effect of compounding and exponential growth. You think every wealthy person just "won the lottery"?
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 At the end of the day, it’s not a joke to the people who won! And like they always say; somebody’s going to win… It could be you! Couple of bucks is a small price to pay for a little unrealistic optimism.
@@HM2SGT Except its spending a couple of bucks on an astronomically slim chance so slim that its basically a stupidity tax. Also just waiting, hoping to improve your life by winning a ridiculously unlikely raffle rather than actually planning and working to improve your situation reeks of having given up or plain ignorance. Also you could instead use that couple of bucks to buy dividend shares and in 10 years that money will have grown exponentially rather than just thrown away
Looks like someone got behind on the greasing schedule. It seems like an odd oversight that no one thought to center the rudder when the ship was last operated under its own power. Maybe they didn't know it would be the last time. Anyway, great video.
It was decommissioned officially on San Jacinto Day 1948. The rudder change was the final command from her Captain. Admiral Nimitz was right there to welcome the crew and announced the retirement of Texas and transfer her to the State of Texas.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 lol I'm sure she feels the same way! Really appreciate the time you are taking. This is my favorite ship of all time. I wish it was still open. I live in south houston
I got to see these spaces several years ago during a hard hat tour of the Texas. Really cool to see the steering gears and equipment back there. Thanks for another awesome video!!
17 April 191, the keel was laid for this magnificent ship. This was less than 50 years after the battle of the ironclads during the civil war! Amazing!
Freaking amazing. Its so sad that these ships cant be kept in prestine condition forever. Our childeren 2-5 generations from now will never have a clue as we lose this info daily
I think she'll raise more tourist revenue once she's been moved to the new site. But will it ever be enough to keep up with her need for constant upkeep? I can't imagine. So unless either the state legislature allocates some funding or some private groups band together to raise some serious money, her days are numbered.
Yes because it's impossible, simply impossible to teach anyone how to remove rust, bolt/weld and replace pannels. Just impossible. Once the current gen passes away we'll never be able to engineer anything again because its just impossible to teach these things.
@@compmanio36 the skills needed to maintain this ship in a deactivated but good cosmetic condition are skills that are used to build and produce current technology. Basically metal work. Which aren't going away. If you are talking about maintaining the ships engines and its various analogue systems in working order then I'd agree that the know how and any specialist skills needed will largely dissappear or already have disappeared. Along with the fact that they'll be close to zero spare parts available, many if not most of the original equipment manufacturers won't exist any more making difficult and expensive to re engineer any replacement parts. It's safe to say the ship will never again be functional save one or two limited systems. So all any museum need to do is keep the ship structurally sound and in good cosmetic shape. Perhaps maintain one or two systems of interest (one gun turret for example) in a semi functional state.
Jeez, this video series is terrific--I could never have figured all this out, no matter how much time I spent wandering around below. Thank you so much for doing this.
Basically, the DC motor was a fly-by-wire system. Probably one of the first ones. I like all those fins boxes. That's an antique gigantic electric speed controller. I bet when you're going slow, that room heats up pretty quick.🤪👍💯
Stood many a watch, Aft Steering, 7 decks below, on a 60's, conventional, Aircraft carrier, Hydraulic "Ram" noise blew , my hearing, left ear, 50% loss right ear.
Fascinating! Your videos make clear that it takes a well-developed civilization in order to be able to design and build a battleship. I’d imagine that modern naval vessels like the Ford-class carriers are even more advanced, and no less impressive!
Thanks for such an excellent explanation. I recently toured the U.S.S. Alabama and was impressed with its restoration, thanks in particular to many volunteers. Texans, both the state and citizens, need to get behind their ship. Too much of the time of volunteers is being devoted to merely keeping the ship afloat. Dry landed, that would no longer be an issue and their labors could be devoted to restoration.
Michael, a dry berth option was studied and a number of proposals based upon it were created over a more than 10 year period. There is no question that it is the best method of guaranteeing the ship's survival. Unfortunately, when its $100 million cost was taken to the Texas state legislature, they were not willing to spend that much money and that plan was permanently eliminated. Whether or not they should have spent the money is an entirely different conversation, suffice it to say that it simply wasn't going to happen. By the way, a study was performed on the less expensive method of dry berthing the ship by bedding her in sand and the conclusion was that it would lead to severe structural damage to the ship. The problem has to do with the soil along the upper Texas gulf coast. It would require sinking about 200 pilings more than 100' deep to provide the needed support. There were a number of other problems with the method that included permanent loss of access to the outer hull below the sand line, ultimately leading to the destruction of the outer hull shell. Before anyone starts tossing out suggestions, know that these conclusions were made after 100's of core samples were drilled throughout the area and studies were made by soil and marine engineers. What the state did do was give $35 million for the current solution, which is to take the ship to drydock and replace almost the entire outer hull shell below the waterline. Between that and other repairs, the ship will have a major reset that puts her in good watertight condition. Her management has also been transferred from a state agency, Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept., to Battleship Texas Foundation, a non-governmental organization. She will also be moved from her current location to one yet to be determined that should greatly increase visitor traffic and income. Between that and private and corporate donations, the goal is to generate enough income to provide a sustainable maintenance and periodic dry docking plan. Again, dry berthing simply wasn't financially possible, but the current plans should assure the ship's survival for decades.
Great display of early 20th century electrical motors and controls. I’ve actually worked with some of that type of equipment that was still operating in the 1980’s.
Wow, that really is a technology wonderland. The steering gear I used was electrically powered hydraulics. This stuff is so wildly different it really is awesome.
She is a treasure that should not be overlooked. Our government screws up everything else I think they should be able to preserve this one old girl for the people
Hi Tom, well, thank you! Fascinating and very good of you to go to so much trouble and contortions to show all this. You are clearly very enthusiastic about all of it and it comes across very well as a result. These are things most people would otherwise never get to see. Glad I don't have to pay your laundry bills! It would be interesting to know the weight of the rudder and even more the balanced forces acting on it as Texas made a tight turn at speed. They must have been considerable. Cheers. BobUK.
Yep, now that it has been proven she is actually floating with the tides. I have no doubt this grand old lady could be repaired in dry dock and sail under her own power to Normandy for the 100th anniversary of D-day if we were so inclined.
Hopefully she'll be in dry dock after hurricane season. The Houston Chronicle published an article last week answering questions about when Battleship Texas will go into dry dock. November at the earliest was the answer given. The Battleship Texas Foundation is confident in the viability of moving her into dry dock. She's expected to be in dry dock for 12 months.
@@cats400 good to know. Given that the USA is the worlds largest economy and such. I assume the work will be next level. We have no ships of her size preserved in England. But the big ships we have (victory, warrior etc) are treat like the nation treasures they are.
My step grandfather was a fireman on the Arkansas, a sister ship to the Texas. His job was to shovel coal into a boiler furnace. He served from 1920 to 1922.
He was a tough man who knew how to work! If he was an actual stoker, he had a tough job, not only because of the heat, dirt and exertion, but it required a lot of knowledge and skill with the shovel. He had to be able to read the fire and not let the bed of coal get too thin where it would cool down, or pile it on too thick where it would create a lot of smoke and choke down. He had to know how to throw coal with a twist of the wrist to evenly spread it over a large area or how to throw a shovel of it through the fire and across the grate to fill in a thin spot in a far corner. That meant looking into the fire at a close range that would burn his face and sing his hair. He also had to frequently move the fire around to remove clinkers and other junk that could clog up the grates and interfere with burning, and periodically clean the fire. All of that had to be done with the boiler running. Again, it was an incredibly tough job that required a lot of skill.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 he was quite the tough man. After getting out of the Navy he sheared sheep around the country. He farmed and eventually became a police officer. He learned to box from another fireman and was hired as a police officer based on his boxing skills. It was truly a different time. I should add he was born in the Oklahoma territory and the family moved back to Iowa just prior to WW1. The person who taught him to box was a man of color (he spoke very highly of) and defended the reputation of the Arkansas as a light heavyweight. He passed in 1999 at the age of 96.
Thanks for making Texas the star of the video and not yourself! I usually have to turn tour vids off after a few minutes because the tour guide insists on being in frame and they tend to think they are the reason they have viewers.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 Heheheh I can relate! I'm so ugly mama had to tie a pork chop around my neck just so the dog would play with me! Once again my thanks.
Oh man thanks for this video. I have vague memories of being aboard the Texas many times when I was 4-5 years old in 1981-82. And I had this memory that's at this point is just a still picture. And it was of those wheels, it was driving me nuts, where the he'll was it? What was it? I was an engineer in the Navy and since modern warships don't look anything like it I just couldn't figure out what I was remembering.
Great explanations. What I see here is also a huge amount of deterioration. Too bad the funds are not available to treat all of the exposed surfaces. The ultimate preservation will be to get the entire boat out of the water after the major drydock repairs have been completed.
I believe the main use of the rudder brake was possibly to keep the sloppy steam operation from making the rudder unmanageable. But I also suspect the rudder brake was also meant to freeze the rudder in position, in case of damage where you lost the ability to turn the rudder at all! However, they probably found early on, with the electric motor installed, they did not need the rudder brake at all, which is why the shaft and drive are missing!
The rudder brake was controlled manually using a hand wheel located on the aft bulkhead, just above and inboard of the large mahogany wheels. That location suggests that it was not something easily or frequently used. I don't think that there was much slop in the steam operated steering equipment between the steam steering engine and the steering gears. However, there was likely noticeable lag between input at the helm and response from the rudder. The design of the screw shaft and mechanical rams that actually turned the rudder is such that it would naturally resist being turned by force applied against the rudder. A good analogy is a car screw jack because it operates on the same principle. You turn the screw to raise the car; however, the weight of the car cannot force the screw to turn, thus the car remains raised. The same types of forces and resistances apply to the steering gear. My best guess is the brake allowed them to clamp down on the steering crosshead attached to the rudder post to hold the rudder in position if they needed to disconnect or service any of the steering gear while under way.
I'd like to do one. However, the videos I have in the engine rooms will not work for this purpose. They are simply fast shots that I used to orient myself when editing still photos that I took in them. I could do something using stills, but they lose the live feel and most folks simply don't want a slide show. Maybe in the future...
Looking at the rudder brake my guess is that it was only used when changing between power & manual steering or maintenance. Reason being the shaft throught the bulkhead is square like a valvestem so it had a handwheel at one time. Reason two, if it was applied when the steering gear wasn’t moving there would be some kind of automatic application.
You appear to be correct. Even though the wheel is missing, the builder's "as built" drawings show that it had one and it appears to be the only way of applying the brake. On the side of the bulkhead opposite from of the brake wheel and manual steering wheels is a coupler that engages and disengages the manual steering shaft from the turning gear. There is a similar coupler for the powered shaft. I reviewed my detail photos of the steering gear and saw that it is possible to simultaneously disengage both the powered and manual shafts from the gears. That being the case, the brake would certainly be useful for holding the rudder in position if both were disconnected at the same time such as when changing from powered to manual steering. I haven't seen any documentation that addresses when the brake may be used, so your reasoning sounds as good as any explanation I can think of.
It's such a shame that no one coated all of the mechanism in grease before putting her to bed. I imagine that the last sailor to turn off the lights was really proud of how clean he left it, Not a speck of grease in sight..
Are any of these machinery spaces open to the public? My last visit to the Texas was about 20 years ago. There weren't many more spaces open than there were 20 years prior to that when I first saw the ship as a kid. Being predominantly a direct current ship I'd really love to see that stuff.
The ship is currently closed to the public while being prepared for tow to a shipyard for hull repairs. When opened almost none of these spaces are available to the public. However, many are visited during special "Hard Hat Tours".
The rudder is still frozen at 14 degrees to starboard and will stay that way. Any bad effect of the rudder on the ship only occurs when the ship is being towed, which is very infrequently. It is easily offset by having a small tug either push against the stern or pull on it using a line rigged to the stern while the ship is under tow. Correcting the rudder was studied during the ship's last dry dock in 1988-90. It was determined that any repair would required cutting the rudder post and remove the rudder to free things up. That would require a very large amount of money and heavy damage to the ship and rudder.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 Thank you for the reply and your explanation makes sense. You are right, 14 degrees isn't much to counter with a tug. It would only need to work if she could move under her own power. That would be a dream to see her drive under her own power again, but the costs to and the part availability would most likely be prohibitive. Your video series here is amazing and hopefully will be around for generations to come, just like the Texas herself! Hopefully you will have these available on other medias other than youtube so they will be preserved.
I'm VERY glad you got to the degrees of rudder! I was beginning to wonder if there was a gauge in the auxillary steering room. If it was greesed up and oiled well, with a balanced rudder would it still take 16 sailors to man the auxillary wheels to turn the rudder? Do you have a SORM for the ship?
I've never seen a unified document, nor do I know if one existed when the ship in active service. I am aware that there were procedural manuals largely by division, but I've only a few things that could serve as parts of an SORM. The most precious one that I have acquired is the engineering casualty manual written during WWII by the ship's engineering officer that I have used as a primary source of information for a couple of my videos.
Speculation- if you were trying to turn the rudder manually, that piece at 5:00 would be a good place to put a brake-activating wheel, to lock things down if it tried to get away from you.
I like that thought. I have some original drawings of the gear that I'll dig up. I don't recall that it shows anything, but it's worth another look. I'll let you know if there is anything additional there.
Clifton, Good Call! I found a drawing dated July 1914, 4 months after commissioning meaning it is a record drawing showing the equipment as built. It shows a hand wheel on the shaft so it is definitely a hand actuated brake! It's too bad I cannot post a clipping of it in these comments so that you can see it.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 That's awesome! Glad I could be helpful! I guess spending my childhood playing on junk turn-of-the-century farming equipment has done some good!
Looks to me as though there is simply a crank handle somewhere, to manually actuate the brake band from the manual steering position, using what appears to be a square drive on the reduction shaft. The hole on the other side is just a bearing for the main shaft isn't it? Or is it splined?
It's amazing how many battleships are preserved. Also amazing is the neglected pride of engineering, the SS United States. The still current record holder of the Atlantic crossing. Compared to the US's 44 kt speed, these BBs are just barges with guns.
So she'll want to crab off to one side while under tow. Just means your girl has personality. If you really wanted to correct the rudder angle it would be best to do it while she's out of the water so the yard can work to release the rudder post without having to worry about flooding. You'll need about 1500 gallons of WD-40 for the job. 😂😂 (That's a sailor joke guys!)
They had Texas out of the water in 1988 and repairing the rudder was carefully studied by at least one marine engineer and shipyard workers. The consensus was that a repair would require cutting the rudder off and effectively destroying the rudder post. Since there is no reason to have a moveable rudder and it is easy to overcome the deflection caused by the rudder's current position during tow, the decision was to leave it. Also, the rudder post packing had leaked since the ship first went in the water, throughout her active career and during retirement. This was a major source of the flooding in aft steering. So, they welded around the post to permanently eliminate the leak. Again, the thing to keep in mind here is that the ship will never be operational and there's no need for a working rudder. Also, a primary goal of that project was to eliminate leaks and there was only one reasonable solution to eliminate this one.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 I didn't know that, thank you! I tend to think in terms of preservation through restoration and repair, often through restoring function. You and they are correct in this case, restoration of function is not necessary nor even desirable in this case. I guess serving at sea colors my thinking.
@@robertf3479 yeah it's kind of sad but without billions and billions of dollars and a whole lot of legal hoopla/power restoring the ship to any kind of functionality is going to simply be impossible
Корабль легенда👍. Ветеран двух мировых войн💪👍. Поднять пар , да пройти на полном ходу по морю🙂🙂🙂. Жаль уже так не будет😐. Пусть теперь дедушка-ветеран отдыхает🫡
@@tomscotttheolderone364 🤝✊️. Может когда-нибудь моя мечта сбудется и я смогу поднятся на борт этой легенды🙂. И на BB- 63 тоже интересно сходить🤤🤗. Удачи вам парни!! 🤝👍
Good question; I have no idea. I find it difficult to believe that a magnetic compass could reliably work down there. The stand is empty and I would have guessed it contained a gyrocompass repeater, except you wouldn't need the compensators mounted to it.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 Supernumerary? 🤔A lot of work to haul it topside, but…🤷♂️ I’ve seen stranger things. It was the right way, the wrong way, and the Navy way! Or maybe after she was struck, somebody thought that would be a dandy place to put one. Be interesting to see if it was on the original TO&E.
Using manual steering on Texas would be slow and difficult. I suspect that even if it was not really needed, low cost and ease of design made including it on the ship an easy decision. Also, at that time, it was a doable design for all warships, regardless of size. I haven't gone to any effort to find out, but I would be very surprised to find out it is used on modern aircraft carriers and other ships having multiple rudders. Ship size and complexity, combined with limited effect, should pretty much rule it out as a practical addition. Short of some pretty wild speculation about its use on Texas, I find it difficult to imagine a scenario where they would have to resorted to manual steering while under way. Having said that, it would be very useful if they needed to reposition the rudder without firing up the steam or electric steering engines. This would certainly be the case if it was required while in dry dock.
Degaussing has to do with demagnetizing, not dissipating static electricity. In this case, it was done to lower the ship's visibility to magnetic anti-shipping mines. As a ship passes by a mine, its metallic mass disturbs the Earth's magnetic field and triggers the mine. The goal in this case is to match the Earth's magnetic field to be invisible to mines. The ship has sets of heavy electrical cables that encircle the hull on the inside, both horizontally and vertically. Electrical currents are passed through them to vary intensity and polarity. If you watch the first part of my video on stem and stern castings, you will see the windings. If you watch the one on generating electrical power, you will get a brief glimpse of one of the controllers.
The prevailing reason given is that 14 degrees starboard was the last rudder order given as the ship was towed to her berth at San Jacinto in 1948, and no further order was given to center it. Why that wasn't given or why it wasn't later straightened by Battleship Texas Commission staff is not known.
I’m surprised that there isn’t more grease or oil etc on these parts? Obviously they haven’t been used in decades and decades but grease doesn’t tend to evaporate does it?
Yes, it kinda does. The volatiles in the oil slowly evaporate, and you are left with a crusty powder that doesn't lubricate anything. That can end up flaking off like dust or rust scale. You are often left with a powdery coating that looks like dusty rust. This takes years, but Texas has been sitting there for enough years.
The rudder post has been frozen in its current position for at least 50 years. Inspection of it during the 1988-89 drydock repairs determined that trying to free it would cost too much and require too much cutting and welding to be feasible.
It was flooded for many years due to leaks from several sources. Those were all repaired in 1988-89 when the ship was in dry dock and there hasn’t been any flooding issues since then. It hasn’t been restored because it is pretty stable and limited resources had to go to higher priority issues.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 didn’t they also partially flood her intentionally to set her on the bottom to resist tidal movement when she initially arrived at San Jacinto?
How could all that missing gear just simply vanish with no records? It's not like any tourist visitor could just snatch it up and climb all those spaces with it under their overcoat.
Y'all need to try and get PB blaster or WD-40 makers to sponsor you guys.. alot of rust, alot of history, alot of blood sweat and years were put into the TEXAS long before WW2. Amazing how tough you had to be to serve on her!
My second favorite remaining battle ship! My favorite is the USS Alabama! Unlike the Texas the Alabama is well cared for! It's a absolute disgrace that this beautiful treasure is in the condition it is in! Someone needs to step up and buy the ship and fix her or the people who own her now need to wake the hell up and get off their ass and fix her! It's absolutely pathetic that this old girl is in this condition! The only ww1 battle ships remaining are the Texas and the one in Japan that was built by great Britain and at least that ship was repaired and fixed up so the public can visit her! But the Texas is basically the last of her kind and she should be treated as such! She is a amazing ship and with some work she could be with us for a long time to come but it needs to happen soon! If something happens to her God forbid she sinks or anything like that everyone involved needs to be sued into poverty! I myself and many others are angry that it has come to this! Save the ship dam it!!!!
A distinction needs to be drawn between the steam steering engine room and aft steering. The steam steering engine is in a small compartment adjoining the aft end of the starboard engine room and its output shaft carries aft to aft steering. Go to the following link to see a drawing that shows aft steering and the steering gear room. The scale in the centerline of the drawing shows frame numbers that are 4' apart. battleshiptexas.info/images/Drawings/DeckPlans/1944/2ndPlat.html
It does seem he's been spending money trying to prevent illness. I think he can continue to do that and others can donate our money to preserve history.
@@mikeadler2755 While I don't completely agree with him, I think you misunderstand the OP. No one is going to ask Texas to fight again, save some last desperation. What he's wondering is why, with so many of the high-profile billionaires publicly supporting seemingly less worthy endeavors, someone hasn't taken up the cause of repairing the grand old girl.
As an electronics engineer, this makes me happy to see. All of that needs to be saved so we know where we came from and where we need to go.
Fabulous. Stood after steering watch a few times on tin cans in the 70’s.....small brass wheel about the size of a dinner plate. Compass repeater in front of you.
Was cool to think ‘Wow I’m steering a 300 ft. Destroyer from its ass end and I can’t see a damn thing.....’ lol
Thanks for your service! 69-73 here. USS SEATTLE AOE-3 HERE.
This is why she is such an important vessel to keep preserved, nothing quite like it anywhere else.
@Rayan Cairo No one cares, scammers.
@@waterheaterservices How stupid would you have to be, right?
@@HighlandLaddie I see, your just in here trying your hardest to be an ass to everyone. Makes sense now.
@@HighlandLaddie really? So Canada has a few ww1 battle ships? Wow never heard about them before plus if I remember correctly the only UK made ww1 battle ship left is in Japan! From what I've heard the UK scrapped all of its old battle ships! So please start naming these ww1 and ww2 battleships that you say exist because we would like to visit them? Well we are waiting?????
@@HighlandLaddie again where are these ww1 battle ships that you say still exist and btw what are their names? Again we are waiting?????
Great videos, keep up the good work! After watching all of Ryan Szimanski's videos from Battleship New Jersey, I was hoping to see similar videos of the Texas, and these are great
Love what both of them are doing!!!
These are much more informative than Ryan's are. Ryan's video's mostly stay focused on his face and never really show us much of nothing. His later video's have gotten better I have to admit but Tom Scott video's are better.
@@museumjunkie9317 Glad I'm not the only one that thinks that. All we see is Ryan... here, all we see is ship.
Maybe Tom is not as good looking as Ryan!!
Difference is Tom focuses solely on hardcore USS Texas information. Ryan focuses on playing with LEGO blocks and never does first person views like this of the areas off limits to visitors.
I wish I could hit the lottery and spend the rest of my life learning about her and volunteering to keep her around. Your walk through are crazy informative. Please keep doing this!!
Lottory is a joke. Why do people always go on about "if I won the lottery" anyone can become wealthy by investing money smartly. Understand the effect of compounding and exponential growth. You think every wealthy person just "won the lottery"?
bobby ray of the family smith because it's nice to dream. Scroll on if you have nothing good to say. Thank you, I hope you have a nice day.
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 At the end of the day, it’s not a joke to the people who won! And like they always say; somebody’s going to win… It could be you! Couple of bucks is a small price to pay for a little unrealistic optimism.
@@HM2SGT Except its spending a couple of bucks on an astronomically slim chance so slim that its basically a stupidity tax. Also just waiting, hoping to improve your life by winning a ridiculously unlikely raffle rather than actually planning and working to improve your situation reeks of having given up or plain ignorance.
Also you could instead use that couple of bucks to buy dividend shares and in 10 years that money will have grown exponentially rather than just thrown away
Looks like someone got behind on the greasing schedule. It seems like an odd oversight that no one thought to center the rudder when the ship was last operated under its own power. Maybe they didn't know it would be the last time. Anyway, great video.
It was decommissioned officially on San Jacinto Day 1948. The rudder change was the final command from her Captain. Admiral Nimitz was right there to welcome the crew and announced the retirement of Texas and transfer her to the State of Texas.
Tom, you are a national treasure! Thank you for doing these videos so your knowledge can live on.
I'll give you my wife's cellphone number so that you can tell her the national treasure part!
@@tomscotttheolderone364 lol I'm sure she feels the same way! Really appreciate the time you are taking. This is my favorite ship of all time. I wish it was still open. I live in south houston
Great job Tom! Sorry FANTASTIC JOB!
@@tomscotttheolderone364 can't wait to get down there and see her and meet you!
Excellent, Tom. I enjoy being able to see her again through your videos.
I got to see these spaces several years ago during a hard hat tour of the Texas. Really cool to see the steering gears and equipment back there. Thanks for another awesome video!!
My brother and I took a trip to Texas and took that tour in 2013! One of the best tours I have ever taken!!
17 April 191, the keel was laid for this magnificent ship. This was less than 50 years after the battle of the ironclads during the civil war! Amazing!
An amazing ship, a true American treasure and the pride of Texas. It's heartbreaking she will never sail under her own power again.
Nice video Tom. Had not seen the deck-frame areas of the Steering Gear Room since the metal replacement. Top notch metal work
Yeah, Taylor Marine did a great job!
Freaking amazing. Its so sad that these ships cant be kept in prestine condition forever. Our childeren 2-5 generations from now will never have a clue as we lose this info daily
I think she'll raise more tourist revenue once she's been moved to the new site. But will it ever be enough to keep up with her need for constant upkeep? I can't imagine. So unless either the state legislature allocates some funding or some private groups band together to raise some serious money, her days are numbered.
Yes because it's impossible, simply impossible to teach anyone how to remove rust, bolt/weld and replace pannels. Just impossible. Once the current gen passes away we'll never be able to engineer anything again because its just impossible to teach these things.
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 Just takes one generation to cause the gap that takes multiple generations to fix.
@@compmanio36 the skills needed to maintain this ship in a deactivated but good cosmetic condition are skills that are used to build and produce current technology. Basically metal work. Which aren't going away.
If you are talking about maintaining the ships engines and its various analogue systems in working order then I'd agree that the know how and any specialist skills needed will largely dissappear or already have disappeared. Along with the fact that they'll be close to zero spare parts available, many if not most of the original equipment manufacturers won't exist any more making difficult and expensive to re engineer any replacement parts. It's safe to say the ship will never again be functional save one or two limited systems. So all any museum need to do is keep the ship structurally sound and in good cosmetic shape. Perhaps maintain one or two systems of interest (one gun turret for example) in a semi functional state.
unknown 1984 - Remember the old saying: You should never say never 🧐
I always wondered how the big old ships were steered. Now i know! Thanks Tom!!
Great video. Excellent information on how the system worked as a whole. Like seeing the repaired decking and frames. Thanks Tom
Glad you enjoyed it!
Very Interesting. Gotta love old, well built technology.
Can you imagine who had to design all this stuff, and who had to build it?.
Amazing historical floating history so much innovation over the lifespan of a beautiful ship
That was my GQ station when I was on minesweepers, every thing was just a wee bit smaller!
Jeez, this video series is terrific--I could never have figured all this out, no matter how much time I spent wandering around below. Thank you so much for doing this.
Basically, the DC motor was a fly-by-wire system. Probably one of the first ones. I like all those fins boxes. That's an antique gigantic electric speed controller. I bet when you're going slow, that room heats up pretty quick.🤪👍💯
Stood many a watch, Aft Steering, 7 decks below, on a 60's, conventional, Aircraft carrier, Hydraulic "Ram" noise blew , my hearing, left ear, 50% loss right ear.
Fascinating! Your videos make clear that it takes a well-developed civilization in order to be able to design and build a battleship. I’d imagine that modern naval vessels like the Ford-class carriers are even more advanced, and no less impressive!
There's one thing better about Texas. Her 14" guns work better than Ford's catapults and elevators!
Thanks for such an excellent explanation. I recently toured the U.S.S. Alabama and was impressed with its restoration, thanks in particular to many volunteers. Texans, both the state and citizens, need to get behind their ship. Too much of the time of volunteers is being devoted to merely keeping the ship afloat. Dry landed, that would no longer be an issue and their labors could be devoted to restoration.
Michael, a dry berth option was studied and a number of proposals based upon it were created over a more than 10 year period. There is no question that it is the best method of guaranteeing the ship's survival. Unfortunately, when its $100 million cost was taken to the Texas state legislature, they were not willing to spend that much money and that plan was permanently eliminated. Whether or not they should have spent the money is an entirely different conversation, suffice it to say that it simply wasn't going to happen. By the way, a study was performed on the less expensive method of dry berthing the ship by bedding her in sand and the conclusion was that it would lead to severe structural damage to the ship. The problem has to do with the soil along the upper Texas gulf coast. It would require sinking about 200 pilings more than 100' deep to provide the needed support. There were a number of other problems with the method that included permanent loss of access to the outer hull below the sand line, ultimately leading to the destruction of the outer hull shell. Before anyone starts tossing out suggestions, know that these conclusions were made after 100's of core samples were drilled throughout the area and studies were made by soil and marine engineers.
What the state did do was give $35 million for the current solution, which is to take the ship to drydock and replace almost the entire outer hull shell below the waterline. Between that and other repairs, the ship will have a major reset that puts her in good watertight condition. Her management has also been transferred from a state agency, Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept., to Battleship Texas Foundation, a non-governmental organization. She will also be moved from her current location to one yet to be determined that should greatly increase visitor traffic and income. Between that and private and corporate donations, the goal is to generate enough income to provide a sustainable maintenance and periodic dry docking plan.
Again, dry berthing simply wasn't financially possible, but the current plans should assure the ship's survival for decades.
Great display of early 20th century electrical motors and controls. I’ve actually worked with some of that type of equipment that was still operating in the 1980’s.
Thank you so much for posting videos about the proud battleship TEXAS.
Those mahogany steering wheels are such a beautiful call-out to the age of sail that had recently passed when this ship was new! 😍
Now I can tour the Texas where I never got to go. Thanks
Wow, that really is a technology wonderland. The steering gear I used was electrically powered hydraulics. This stuff is so wildly different it really is awesome.
She is a treasure that should not be overlooked. Our government screws up everything else I think they should be able to preserve this one old girl for the people
Hi Tom, well, thank you! Fascinating and very good of you to go to so much trouble and contortions to show all this. You are clearly very enthusiastic about all of it and it comes across very well as a result. These are things most people would otherwise never get to see. Glad I don't have to pay your laundry bills! It would be interesting to know the weight of the rudder and even more the balanced forces acting on it as Texas made a tight turn at speed. They must have been considerable. Cheers. BobUK.
Another great video Tom. Interesting to see the contrast between Texas’ steering rams and the hydraulic rams on younger ships.
Thankyou for these great views inside this great ship.
Thank you for these videos. Without some kind of 3d modeling to tour around these places I'm not sure how anybody but people like you would see it.
Illuminating content again, Tom! I didn't know about the steering selector switch or rudder post brake band.
Thanks for the video. Been a fan/visitor of the old girl for decades.
Awesome!! She’ll be fine on the tow. Come on Texas!!
Yep, now that it has been proven she is actually floating with the tides. I have no doubt this grand old lady could be repaired in dry dock and sail under her own power to Normandy for the 100th anniversary of D-day if we were so inclined.
@@JefferyAClark The expense would be prohibitive
Dads battlestation on BB44 was aft emergency steering.He said the wheel was huge and polished Bronze.👍
It feels very sad to see the old Battleships in such bad condition.
If you think about it. It's excellent to see her in such excellent condition. Given that all her contemporaries are sunk or recycled.
Hopefully she'll be in dry dock after hurricane season. The Houston Chronicle published an article last week answering questions about when Battleship Texas will go into dry dock. November at the earliest was the answer given. The Battleship Texas Foundation is confident in the viability of moving her into dry dock. She's expected to be in dry dock for 12 months.
@@cats400 good to know. Given that the USA is the worlds largest economy and such. I assume the work will be next level. We have no ships of her size preserved in England. But the big ships we have (victory, warrior etc) are treat like the nation treasures they are.
Thanks for the detailed crawl-through views. I've been back as far as the steam steering gear, but not beyond.
My step grandfather was a fireman on the Arkansas, a sister ship to the Texas. His job was to shovel coal into a boiler furnace. He served from 1920 to 1922.
He was a tough man who knew how to work! If he was an actual stoker, he had a tough job, not only because of the heat, dirt and exertion, but it required a lot of knowledge and skill with the shovel. He had to be able to read the fire and not let the bed of coal get too thin where it would cool down, or pile it on too thick where it would create a lot of smoke and choke down. He had to know how to throw coal with a twist of the wrist to evenly spread it over a large area or how to throw a shovel of it through the fire and across the grate to fill in a thin spot in a far corner. That meant looking into the fire at a close range that would burn his face and sing his hair. He also had to frequently move the fire around to remove clinkers and other junk that could clog up the grates and interfere with burning, and periodically clean the fire. All of that had to be done with the boiler running. Again, it was an incredibly tough job that required a lot of skill.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 he was quite the tough man. After getting out of the Navy he sheared sheep around the country. He farmed and eventually became a police officer. He learned to box from another fireman and was hired as a police officer based on his boxing skills. It was truly a different time. I should add he was born in the Oklahoma territory and the family moved back to Iowa just prior to WW1. The person who taught him to box was a man of color (he spoke very highly of) and defended the reputation of the Arkansas as a light heavyweight. He passed in 1999 at the age of 96.
Thanks for making Texas the star of the video and not yourself! I usually have to turn tour vids off after a few minutes because the tour guide insists on being in frame and they tend to think they are the reason they have viewers.
Thanks. It's not only next to impossible to be in frame without an assistant, I'm too ugly to be in it!
@@tomscotttheolderone364 Heheheh I can relate! I'm so ugly mama had to tie a pork chop around my neck just so the dog would play with me! Once again my thanks.
Great work Tom!
Oh man thanks for this video. I have vague memories of being aboard the Texas many times when I was 4-5 years old in 1981-82. And I had this memory that's at this point is just a still picture. And it was of those wheels, it was driving me nuts, where the he'll was it? What was it? I was an engineer in the Navy and since modern warships don't look anything like it I just couldn't figure out what I was remembering.
Just the sound of the echo as he speaks reminds me of being in old concrete and steel forts along the mouth of the Columbia River, from the same era.
This is such a cool ship! I couldn't imagine the work to get it back barely functional again. Seems like enough work just to keep it afloat!
Fascinating to see.
Though a lot of details went beyond me.
Thank you Tom Scott! Real nice!
That's an impressive starting circuit
Great information thank you some real gems as far as old technology 👍🏼
Interesting to see how all this old tech works. She truly is the last dreadnaught.
Awesome. Thank you for posting. Very very interesting.
Great explanations. What I see here is also a huge amount of deterioration. Too bad the funds are not available to treat all of the exposed surfaces. The ultimate preservation will be to get the entire boat out of the water after the major drydock repairs have been completed.
Ive been in that compartment. I loved the whole 1 on 1 tour i got.
Oh, I was surprised to see Tom Scott, of the red shirt, covering naval content. Different youtuber lol, but nice video thanks for it.
I believe the main use of the rudder brake was possibly to keep the sloppy steam operation from making the rudder unmanageable. But I also suspect the rudder brake was also meant to freeze the rudder in position, in case of damage where you lost the ability to turn the rudder at all!
However, they probably found early on, with the electric motor installed, they did not need the rudder brake at all, which is why the shaft and drive are missing!
The rudder brake was controlled manually using a hand wheel located on the aft bulkhead, just above and inboard of the large mahogany wheels. That location suggests that it was not something easily or frequently used. I don't think that there was much slop in the steam operated steering equipment between the steam steering engine and the steering gears. However, there was likely noticeable lag between input at the helm and response from the rudder. The design of the screw shaft and mechanical rams that actually turned the rudder is such that it would naturally resist being turned by force applied against the rudder. A good analogy is a car screw jack because it operates on the same principle. You turn the screw to raise the car; however, the weight of the car cannot force the screw to turn, thus the car remains raised. The same types of forces and resistances apply to the steering gear. My best guess is the brake allowed them to clamp down on the steering crosshead attached to the rudder post to hold the rudder in position if they needed to disconnect or service any of the steering gear while under way.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 That makes more sense!
Never realized that a battleship of this size would have a screw type steering gear!
Awesome video Thanks!!!!
Wow, how old must some of that paint be!
*couch cough*,,,,, I think I got lead poisoning just watching this video,,,,, ;)
This ship really deserves care, why not a special lottery for it?
Well if I win the lottery I'll donate half of it to make sure the ship gets rebuilt in preserves for the next generation
Excellent video and explanations. Tom, do you also have a video on the recep. Engines and how they work?
I'd like to do one. However, the videos I have in the engine rooms will not work for this purpose. They are simply fast shots that I used to orient myself when editing still photos that I took in them. I could do something using stills, but they lose the live feel and most folks simply don't want a slide show. Maybe in the future...
Wonderful video, insightful and your clearly knowlagable. Subscribed, Texas is on my bucket list. Shame she's half a world away from me :(
Looking at the rudder brake my guess is that it was only used when changing between power & manual steering or maintenance.
Reason being the shaft throught the bulkhead is square like a valvestem so it had a handwheel at one time.
Reason two, if it was applied when the steering gear wasn’t moving there would be some kind of automatic application.
You appear to be correct. Even though the wheel is missing, the builder's "as built" drawings show that it had one and it appears to be the only way of applying the brake. On the side of the bulkhead opposite from of the brake wheel and manual steering wheels is a coupler that engages and disengages the manual steering shaft from the turning gear. There is a similar coupler for the powered shaft. I reviewed my detail photos of the steering gear and saw that it is possible to simultaneously disengage both the powered and manual shafts from the gears. That being the case, the brake would certainly be useful for holding the rudder in position if both were disconnected at the same time such as when changing from powered to manual steering. I haven't seen any documentation that addresses when the brake may be used, so your reasoning sounds as good as any explanation I can think of.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 do you know the full story why her rudder is turned over and wont be set straight?
It's such a shame that no one coated all of the mechanism in grease before putting her to bed.
I imagine that the last sailor to turn off the lights was really proud of how clean he left it, Not a speck of grease in sight..
Are any of these machinery spaces open to the public? My last visit to the Texas was about 20 years ago. There weren't many more spaces open than there were 20 years prior to that when I first saw the ship as a kid. Being predominantly a direct current ship I'd really love to see that stuff.
The ship is currently closed to the public while being prepared for tow to a shipyard for hull repairs. When opened almost none of these spaces are available to the public. However, many are visited during special "Hard Hat Tours".
Oh how I'd love to see Ryan getting lugged around.
What a feat of engineering!
Fascinating information which I ALMOST follow! Please explain how you know all of this since you obviously are not old enough to have built the ship!
Built in the 1910's think about that.
And hasn’t been functional in the last 60 years lol
@@mikeadler2755 I think it's better to say it hasn't been maintained for 60-70 years. My point was they designed and built these ships in the 1910's.
Very interesting indeed. Thank you.
With the recent move to dry-dock, how did they un-freeze the rudder and steering gears? Did they have to damage the mechanize to do so?
The rudder is still frozen at 14 degrees to starboard and will stay that way. Any bad effect of the rudder on the ship only occurs when the ship is being towed, which is very infrequently. It is easily offset by having a small tug either push against the stern or pull on it using a line rigged to the stern while the ship is under tow. Correcting the rudder was studied during the ship's last dry dock in 1988-90. It was determined that any repair would required cutting the rudder post and remove the rudder to free things up. That would require a very large amount of money and heavy damage to the ship and rudder.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 Thank you for the reply and your explanation makes sense. You are right, 14 degrees isn't much to counter with a tug. It would only need to work if she could move under her own power. That would be a dream to see her drive under her own power again, but the costs to and the part availability would most likely be prohibitive. Your video series here is amazing and hopefully will be around for generations to come, just like the Texas herself! Hopefully you will have these available on other medias other than youtube so they will be preserved.
I'm VERY glad you got to the degrees of rudder! I was beginning to wonder if there was a gauge in the auxillary steering room. If it was greesed up and oiled well, with a balanced rudder would it still take 16 sailors to man the auxillary wheels to turn the rudder? Do you have a SORM for the ship?
I've never seen a unified document, nor do I know if one existed when the ship in active service. I am aware that there were procedural manuals largely by division, but I've only a few things that could serve as parts of an SORM. The most precious one that I have acquired is the engineering casualty manual written during WWII by the ship's engineering officer that I have used as a primary source of information for a couple of my videos.
Speculation- if you were trying to turn the rudder manually, that piece at 5:00 would be a good place to put a brake-activating wheel, to lock things down if it tried to get away from you.
I like that thought. I have some original drawings of the gear that I'll dig up. I don't recall that it shows anything, but it's worth another look. I'll let you know if there is anything additional there.
Clifton, Good Call! I found a drawing dated July 1914, 4 months after commissioning meaning it is a record drawing showing the equipment as built. It shows a hand wheel on the shaft so it is definitely a hand actuated brake! It's too bad I cannot post a clipping of it in these comments so that you can see it.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 That's awesome! Glad I could be helpful!
I guess spending my childhood playing on junk turn-of-the-century farming equipment has done some good!
Looks to me as though there is simply a crank handle somewhere, to manually actuate the brake band from the manual steering position, using what appears to be a square drive on the reduction shaft. The hole on the other side is just a bearing for the main shaft isn't it? Or is it splined?
Congress wanted to sink the ship making a fish reef. Lots of private money is being used to keep the ship intact.
It's amazing how many battleships are preserved. Also amazing is the neglected pride of engineering, the SS United States. The still current record holder of the Atlantic crossing. Compared to the US's 44 kt speed, these BBs are just barges with guns.
Is there a future project to rebuild all the Generators, Steam and Diesel Engines including the Main Distribution Panels and Switch Gearing ?
Hopfully they'll restore most if not all the machinery spaces
Amazing video
So she'll want to crab off to one side while under tow. Just means your girl has personality.
If you really wanted to correct the rudder angle it would be best to do it while she's out of the water so the yard can work to release the rudder post without having to worry about flooding. You'll need about 1500 gallons of WD-40 for the job. 😂😂 (That's a sailor joke guys!)
They had Texas out of the water in 1988 and repairing the rudder was carefully studied by at least one marine engineer and shipyard workers. The consensus was that a repair would require cutting the rudder off and effectively destroying the rudder post. Since there is no reason to have a moveable rudder and it is easy to overcome the deflection caused by the rudder's current position during tow, the decision was to leave it. Also, the rudder post packing had leaked since the ship first went in the water, throughout her active career and during retirement. This was a major source of the flooding in aft steering. So, they welded around the post to permanently eliminate the leak. Again, the thing to keep in mind here is that the ship will never be operational and there's no need for a working rudder. Also, a primary goal of that project was to eliminate leaks and there was only one reasonable solution to eliminate this one.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 I didn't know that, thank you!
I tend to think in terms of preservation through restoration and repair, often through restoring function. You and they are correct in this case, restoration of function is not necessary nor even desirable in this case. I guess serving at sea colors my thinking.
@@robertf3479 yeah it's kind of sad but without billions and billions of dollars and a whole lot of legal hoopla/power restoring the ship to any kind of functionality is going to simply be impossible
Корабль легенда👍. Ветеран двух мировых войн💪👍.
Поднять пар , да пройти на полном ходу по морю🙂🙂🙂.
Жаль уже так не будет😐. Пусть теперь дедушка-ветеран отдыхает🫡
Спасибо, мы позаботимся о ней!
@@tomscotttheolderone364 🤝✊️. Может когда-нибудь моя мечта сбудется и я смогу поднятся на борт этой легенды🙂. И на BB- 63 тоже интересно сходить🤤🤗.
Удачи вам парни!! 🤝👍
How was this rudder better protected than Bismarck’s rudder?
It wasn't.
It looked like there is a binnacle stand down there near the four mahogany 'Wheels'. How did they isolate that from the steel environment?
Good question; I have no idea. I find it difficult to believe that a magnetic compass could reliably work down there. The stand is empty and I would have guessed it contained a gyrocompass repeater, except you wouldn't need the compensators mounted to it.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 Supernumerary? 🤔A lot of work to haul it topside, but…🤷♂️ I’ve seen stranger things. It was the right way, the wrong way, and the Navy way! Or maybe after she was struck, somebody thought that would be a dandy place to put one. Be interesting to see if it was on the original TO&E.
I wonder if modern day war ships still have human powered rudder control wheels as a failsafe? (04:15)
Using manual steering on Texas would be slow and difficult. I suspect that even if it was not really needed, low cost and ease of design made including it on the ship an easy decision. Also, at that time, it was a doable design for all warships, regardless of size. I haven't gone to any effort to find out, but I would be very surprised to find out it is used on modern aircraft carriers and other ships having multiple rudders. Ship size and complexity, combined with limited effect, should pretty much rule it out as a practical addition. Short of some pretty wild speculation about its use on Texas, I find it difficult to imagine a scenario where they would have to resorted to manual steering while under way. Having said that, it would be very useful if they needed to reposition the rudder without firing up the steam or electric steering engines. This would certainly be the case if it was required while in dry dock.
Cool video thank you
I hope a everything eventually gets restored
How do they Degause a ship like this? Is there a strip dragged behind to bleed off the static?
Degaussing has to do with demagnetizing, not dissipating static electricity. In this case, it was done to lower the ship's visibility to magnetic anti-shipping mines. As a ship passes by a mine, its metallic mass disturbs the Earth's magnetic field and triggers the mine. The goal in this case is to match the Earth's magnetic field to be invisible to mines. The ship has sets of heavy electrical cables that encircle the hull on the inside, both horizontally and vertically. Electrical currents are passed through them to vary intensity and polarity. If you watch the first part of my video on stem and stern castings, you will see the windings. If you watch the one on generating electrical power, you will get a brief glimpse of one of the controllers.
Tom, do we know why the rudder was left at 14 degrees Port?
The prevailing reason given is that 14 degrees starboard was the last rudder order given as the ship was towed to her berth at San Jacinto in 1948, and no further order was given to center it. Why that wasn't given or why it wasn't later straightened by Battleship Texas Commission staff is not known.
I’m surprised that there isn’t more grease or oil etc on these parts? Obviously they haven’t been used in decades and decades but grease doesn’t tend to evaporate does it?
Yes, it kinda does. The volatiles in the oil slowly evaporate, and you are left with a crusty powder that doesn't lubricate anything. That can end up flaking off like dust or rust scale. You are often left with a powdery coating that looks like dusty rust. This takes years, but Texas has been sitting there for enough years.
@@lwilton makes one wonder, if nobody thought about doing a greasing run every few years
Thank you sir
I assume rudde mechanism is corroded shut by now?
The rudder post has been frozen in its current position for at least 50 years. Inspection of it during the 1988-89 drydock repairs determined that trying to free it would cost too much and require too much cutting and welding to be feasible.
Really interesting
I heard it was leaking but wow looks like it was under water
It was flooded for many years due to leaks from several sources. Those were all repaired in 1988-89 when the ship was in dry dock and there hasn’t been any flooding issues since then. It hasn’t been restored because it is pretty stable and limited resources had to go to higher priority issues.
@@tomscotttheolderone364 looks like you have alot of light! Dosent look as bad as you would expect to be under water for years
@@tomscotttheolderone364 didn’t they also partially flood her intentionally to set her on the bottom to resist tidal movement when she initially arrived at San Jacinto?
How could all that missing gear just simply vanish with no records? It's not like any tourist visitor could just snatch it up and climb all those spaces with it under their overcoat.
Y'all need to try and get PB blaster or WD-40 makers to sponsor you guys.. alot of rust, alot of history, alot of blood sweat and years were put into the TEXAS long before WW2. Amazing how tough you had to be to serve on her!
My second favorite remaining battle ship! My favorite is the USS Alabama! Unlike the Texas the Alabama is well cared for! It's a absolute disgrace that this beautiful treasure is in the condition it is in! Someone needs to step up and buy the ship and fix her or the people who own her now need to wake the hell up and get off their ass and fix her! It's absolutely pathetic that this old girl is in this condition! The only ww1 battle ships remaining are the Texas and the one in Japan that was built by great Britain and at least that ship was repaired and fixed up so the public can visit her! But the Texas is basically the last of her kind and she should be treated as such! She is a amazing ship and with some work she could be with us for a long time to come but it needs to happen soon! If something happens to her God forbid she sinks or anything like that everyone involved needs to be sued into poverty! I myself and many others are angry that it has come to this! Save the ship dam it!!!!
For a BB-35 nut this should be labeled explicit..
how big is the steam steering room??
A distinction needs to be drawn between the steam steering engine room and aft steering. The steam steering engine is in a small compartment adjoining the aft end of the starboard engine room and its output shaft carries aft to aft steering. Go to the following link to see a drawing that shows aft steering and the steering gear room. The scale in the centerline of the drawing shows frame numbers that are 4' apart. battleshiptexas.info/images/Drawings/DeckPlans/1944/2ndPlat.html
That's to bad about the rudder not being centered.
That ship is slowly rusting away! This is something Bill Gates could spend some of his billions on and make a real difference.
Well, he helped find USS Johnston, so I wouldn't say he's not making a difference.
It does seem he's been spending money trying to prevent illness. I think he can continue to do that and others can donate our money to preserve history.
@@BrianHoff04 Nice reply.
Bill gates didn’t become rich pissing off billions of dollars on outdated technology
@@mikeadler2755 While I don't completely agree with him, I think you misunderstand the OP. No one is going to ask Texas to fight again, save some last desperation.
What he's wondering is why, with so many of the high-profile billionaires publicly supporting seemingly less worthy endeavors, someone hasn't taken up the cause of repairing the grand old girl.
Wish I could go and clean her up so she is in better condition
She is the best preserved dreadnought, because the others are all gone.