Blue Origin NS-25 flight nearly ends in human tragedy with parachute failure
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2024
- DISASTER AVERTED: In a shicking turn of evnets Blue Origin's NS-25 Human Space Flight Turns frightening as Parachute Failure Sparked PANIC! 😱 Watch as Jeff Bezos' NS-25 New Shepard Capsule Hangs by a failed parachute supprted only by two chutes instead if three in Heart-Stopping Drama! Despite Nail-Biting Mishap, Mission Ends in Triumph! MUST-SEE Footage Inside!
On NS-25 it looks to me like one of the 3 parachutes didn’t inflate properly, the destructor ring didn’t slide down the lines letting it open.
#blueorigin #NS25 #NewShepard - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
On NS-25 one of the 3 parachutes failed to inflate properly, the destructor ring didn’t slide down the lines letting it open. Thank god everyone landed safely still. It was sure spooky experience. #NS25 #blueorigin
It must have been a bump of a landing, although I'm sure that the couches for the astronauts' bodies were appropriately padded for it.
That’s pretty good for a flying dildo though!
A very good reason why all manned space capsules should have 3 parachutes and not 1, incase one of them fails to deploy properly. 😮
@@takashitamagawa5881Or, it could have special shock absorbers fitted to withstand the bumpy landings at the final stage.
This is why there is REDUNDANCY, END LANDING VELOCITY is achieved with one two or three chutes, only difference would be the time at which this IS achieved. There is NO SIGNIFICANT touch down velocity difference touching down with three, two, or ONLY ONE, fully deployed parachutes. It is clear that the person posting this video knows little on engineering, and there is a clear intention of creating unnecessary ALARM, GOSSIPING AND DISCREDIT.
Wow that's a very phallic rocket......
Agreed !
And not a very large one. More of a celestial chode
Space tourist, Not Astronauts.
thank you
Not much of a tour to me..
Some say they become astronauts as soon as the hold-down bolts blow...because at that point, you're riding a spaceship to SOMEWHERE, whether up or down.
@@wyattdoodat They stopped calling space tourists astronauts in 2021..
@@wyattdoodat for it to be a spaceship it actually has to reach SPACE... they never do.. they come close but if they entered space, they would need to do a burn to re-enter the atmosphere, which is why its called a re-entry burn...
The narrator sounds like fingernails on a chalk board.
So does the occasional hens cackling in the background like they are watching an exclusive, expensive amusment park ride....oh wait...
@@Cobalt135Like what are they even reacting to? The vehicle is hundreds of thousands of feet up, they can't see it so there's nothing o react to 😂
SpaceX's one sounds like a circus barker.
A bad parachute is always a danger to your good ones.
Great point. It can tangle you the good ones and make them inefficient or worse.
Landing with a failed parachute is not “perfectly okay.” It was a failure.
@@jerrypolverino6025
Failures are bound to happen.
A good system is designed to have failures and then handle them appropriately.
Most, if not all, human rated rockets have multiple parachutes and are designed specifically to be able to land safely with one or more failed chutes.
They also design the chutes much more carefully than in some other systems (i.e. skydiving) to ensure that one failed chute is far less likely to take down other chutes with it.
@@redpug5042 i’m well aware of that, but this was a stupid mistake.
@@jerrypolverino6025 It wasn't a stupid mistake, it was an event that was expected to happen at some point. and one that was handled very well.
A stupid mistake would result in fatality or a real risk of fatality.
Neither of those occurred.
There was no doubt that the crew would get down safely.
A very expensive carnival ride. Nuff said.
Does saying "Nuff said" somehow make yoyr opinion more important?
Another Titanic submersible tragedy waiting to happen if they think the parachute failure is a minor problem
I hope for their sake they take this seriously even if the FAA won’t.
Very scarey but I think you may be right.
You have a point. Coupled with the last flight where the capsule had to activate its launch escape system - fortunately with no people inside - New Shepard doesn't have a great safety record. Certainly not a vehicle on which people should be taking joyrides.
A test tube of terror.
@@takashitamagawa5881 ever seen a dragster or watched the Isle of Man races. This is exactly the thing for joyrides.......
Dang, that landing looked as subtle as a cinder block in free fall. This phlying phallus is a disaster waiting to happen.
This is a commercial money-making venture. Expect iron clad secrecy and vehement denials of anything going disastrously wrong that will jeopardize the venture. BO will downplay any glitches, big and small, to save reputation and future prospects. Yet, it's so hard so so many here to understand that.
That dust is from rockets that ignite just before touchdown to cushion the landing. The Soyuz capsules have bren doing that for decades. Nothing unusual there.
It always looks like it's on the border of a Splat-Down.
It's not the freefall that is so bad. It's the sudden stop at the end!
Result: unexpectedly high laundry costs.
This imitation wasn't even under propulsion when it
" went to space ".
Walt Disney would be proud.
A very expensive joyride...
THEY WERE PAID PASSANGERS...NOT ASTRONAUTS!
Why...
try telling this is flag waving cheering stans.
Hardly “space flight”. This is a really expensive carnival ride.
How is it "hardly space flight"? Can you explain? They are well into the clearly defined international boundary of space... please explain the difference between this and "real" space flight? I'm curious what your perceptions are: are you saying being in "space" requires horizontal acceleration? without some horizontal movement you're never in space? Just curious.
Yeah, suborbital flight Definitely doesn't count as space flight in my book.
@@logan4215 “orbital” to be specific just means horizontal velocity. You don’t necessarily need to be any farther into “space”. People like you love to parrot the Musk memes. It’s hilariously sad. There are benefits to ANY company making it to space. You behaving like a child is counter productive to most people’s goals when it comes to space exploration. Seriously spend some time maturing before running your mouth about things you know nothing about.
@@RealErikHansen
Clearly defined international boundary of space; that imaginary zone that rockets pass through on their way to orbit.
@@paulsto6516 you are obviously missing many years of education. “Orbit” does not equal space. Nice try though
The flippant aptitude about one of the chutes NOT opening is mind boggling. Then the hard landing, samething. Oh, it;s ok they have shock absorbers to handle that situation.
This is a commercial money-making venture. Expect iron clad secrecy and vehement denials of anything going disastrously wrong that will jeopardize the venture. BO will downplay any glitches, big and small, to save reputation and future prospects. Yet, it's so hard so so many here to understand that.
What would she say if the capsule started to tumble.
All landings of the BO capsule look to be hard landings, so there's nothing to be said about that. They drop on chutes until they are only a couple of feet from the ground, then they fire retrorockets in the last second to lower the velocity. This one looks no different from their others, though it may have landed harder due to the bad chute opening.
"PART OF THE DESIGN"?! One of the chutes was SUPPOSED to not open?! Do these announcers even think about what they say?
No, they can't think. Bobbleheads being all perky and clever you know. Same as all the media talking heads.
Part of the design, meaning that the parachute was meant to be redundant, so the capsule could still land safely even if one parachute failed
Look up “redundancy”.
@@Captain_Jebediah Exactly.
Redundancy my friend. Redundancy.
Besos "near space" Dildo Flight is true to form! Almost space. Almost worked, Almost worth the tickets! And the announcer was almost able to speak! What a joke! Somebody is going to die is the only certainty!
Hope to god FAA take cognizance of this malfunction and take BO to task over this.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Dangerous JOY RIDE.
Yeah NASA sure has a squeaky clean record of safety. Apollo1, Challenger, and Columbia.
Political BS.. and a racist. I saw a cow get off too.
These are NOT as(ch)tronauts!
They are tourists!
Lift off of Phallus One! After the parachute failure they renamed the company to Brown Origin.
Jeffy Boy is going to kill someone with that stupid thing.
These bugs need to be fixed. And fast.
What a waste of money.
No, this is an awesome example of the Human Endeavor.
Now purchasing any Hunter Biden Painting Is a, monumental waste of money ‼️
@@raghknarrscott1790 As is a POS NFT from Trump.
I agree.. the amount of resources use and wasted for human entertainment 🤔🫣🥱
@@gregorydarden7868 .. Only a tiny mini fraction of the resources & money wasted on other human entertainment things like a TV, or games. 😀
Let's cancel TVs and gaming. 😀
@@BarryBarrington_ sorry my comment upset you. I'm a grown ass man who can do without both of those things . So when are you going up in this since this is something humans need🤔🤡
It reminds all of us every launch is not risk free.
such is life
New Shepherd is an expensive fairground ride. Blue Origin was formed before SpaceX yet still haven’t reached orbit.
There were no gasps of horror, one of the chutes didn’t deploy fully, nobody was in danger.
@@BarryBarrington_
Come on. Sony never entered rocket design or space business.
Why the irritating music?
LOL. Astronauts?! LOL 🤣
Everything about this makes absolutely no sense.
you're not alone in thinking that.
Its a way to make viewers so incredibly jealous that they feel compelled to froth, spit nasty words and use lots of repetitive punctuation in their comments. Oh the drama of it all. Yours may be the only sane comment expressing a less than supportive stance on the matter. It is much appreciated.
Definitely a failure despite people in the comments saying otherwise. Just because you don’t need all three because of redundancy doesn’t make it a real success, it makes it a success on the knife’s edge of disaster.
That thing hit hard. Amazing they are calling these people astronauts.
This is a commercial money-making venture. Expect iron clad secrecy and vehement denials of anything going disastrously wrong that will jeopardize the venture. BO will downplay any glitches, big and small, to save reputation and future prospects. Yet, it's so hard so so many here to understand that.
“Let’s light this candle”
No, Blue Origin, you almost completely incinerated and ended human lives.
Maybe leave rocketry and space travel to the experts…
It's Jeff Bezos, he is a billionaire with the deep blue political leaning so the government will leave him alone. If it belonged to Elon Musk they would be screaming about it on every network.
@@PointOrView except that they just spent two years fixing their last issue so while they will probably downplay, I doubt they will try to sweep it under the rug. And I’m not a big BO / Bezos fan whatsoever. Time will tell.
Seems like the title astronaut has been diluted. Even those that go up on the dragon capsule just sit there.
But they ARE astronauts because the have a job on the ISS. The only difference is they are not pilots. Many Space shuttle participants were not pilots.
@@swinde I guess the ISS folks are astronauts. The dictionary says; noun. as·tro·naut ˈa-strə-ˌnȯt. -ˌnät. plural astronauts. : a person whose profession is to travel beyond the earth's atmosphere. I think Blue Origin riders are not astronauts. They don’t have a job in space. Their training is similar to training an airline gives passengers in case of an emergency.
@@Paiadakine
I agree with you. The ones that just go up for the ride are just like people that travel on airplanes. They have no job in space. I will cut some slack for the former
NASA astronaut that was trained but did not get to fly while he was with NASA.
How much white wine did those spectators drink before watching this launch?
Key stats from today’s mission:
The Crew Capsule reached an apogee of 347,464 ft AGL / 351,111 ft MSL (106 km AGL / 107 km MSL)
The booster reached an apogee of 347,105 ft AGL / 350,752 ft MSL (106 km AGL / 107 km MSL)
Official launch time was 9:35:09 AM CDT / 14:35:09 UTC. Capsule landing occurred at 9:45:02 AM CDT / 14:45:02 UTC.
The mission elapsed time was 9 min 53 sec; the max ascent velocity was 2,236 mph / 3,599 km/h.
Thanks for the numbers. I was wondering about the end results.
.. " this is part of the design..." ???? .... so, one of the parachute is designed to "fail" ? 🙄🤔
😂 it’s weird now they always twist the event to make to sound like it’s a success when it’s clearly a failure
Those commentators were horrible.
It’s not designed to fail, it’s designed to be redundant. To be clear I’m not saying it’s ok that the parachute failed, but it wasn’t a “close brush with disaster.”
This is a commercial money-making venture. Expect iron clad secrecy and vehement denials of anything going disastrously wrong that will jeopardize the venture. BO will downplay any glitches, big and small, to save reputation and future prospects. Yet, it's so hard so so many here to understand that.
the design is to land safely with a parachute failure
Concerning the standard that military parachute riggers hold themselves to this was a complete cluster f*** in comparison
If 1 malfunctioned there is no reason why 2, or even 3 MIGHT NOT HAVE THE VERY SAME FAULT.
Astro - nots
At least SpaceX has real rockets and astronauts plus they actually accomplish something in space, it’s not just a joy ride.
Go Elon, go SpaceX.
Wow. When I saw the landing I did think they hit pretty hard, and then I almost immediately forgot about it. Now I see there actually was a problem. It’s a little bit hard to believe nobody was hurt unless landing with two parachutes really is OK.
I immediately knew everything wasn't right. Blue origin downplayed it so every one let it go. and then suddenly the space media is all over the had landing issue. Of course it must be investigated thoroughly.
If I was on there and landing was really rough, I'd be showing everyone by hip & butt bruises saying, "you know how I got this? Space!"
Hahahah
I'm guessing there are pretty stringent NDA's in place that prevent crew from discussing these types of details.
@@brianguidi3424 let them try and stop me! 😄
@@kittenlang8641 But you weren't on the flight.
This ship will cost somebody their life. Of course after their check clears.
still don't like that there is only one rocket motor...............
Astronauts! So if I drive for 1 min on highway with 240Km/hour I am qualified as F1 driver? Ferrari come and hire me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
🤣🤣🤣 Great analogy.
Its not how high you went, it how do you FEEL, do you feel like a Astronaut ???
@@PointOrView That was great, F1 drving on highways since?
An astronaut is someone who's been to space, that's it.
It doesn't matter how much time spent in space, how fast or slow you get there, how many burgers you eat or how many stars you counted.
That analogy is like.
If I have Karate white belt for 1 min, I am qualified for black belt.
Please stop. There is a reason for three chutes and you were looking at it. No drama needed or necessary.
Pretty damn expensive failure if You ask Me........let us see what comes....😮
I wouldn't hold my breath for investigation findings. Everything will be glossed over and downplayed.
Colonel, you better have a look at this radar...
Huge amount of dust when the booster landed. Did it land on the landing pad? Compare with previous landings. Also the capsule seems to land hard. Some of the astronauts seem to have difficulty walking ...
great observations.
It doesn't land on any prepared pad. The "hard landing" and dust are typical for their capsule landings; they fire retrorockets in the last few feet to slow the capsule from the chute speed. That may have been a little higher this time because of the failed chute. It sounds wonky to do but is not much different from capsule water landings, probably about the same decelerations. The one big difference is that the SpaceX astronauts are trained and at least somewhat fit.
Phew. Raised my heartbeat for a minute.
Multiple chutes capture less air per chute because they're forced sideways, but the sum total will equal or exceed a single chute. They use multiples for redundancy. This title is pure clickbait.
Ed Dwight - first black astronaut, eh? I wonder what Guion Bluford would have to say about that.
Dwight was the first black astronaut CANDIDATE. He was NEVER selected by NASA to join the program and, therefore, was not the first black astronaut.
Is that right? OMG how many people got that wrong?
I am not sure, but I think the first Black Astronaut was on the Challenger. I know that the first and last teacher was on it. It was a horrible tragedy that did not have to happen.
Two of NASAs engineers told them to scrub the mission because of the below freezing temperatures, but were overruled because President Reagan was anxious to have the "Teacher in space" event that day.
@@swinde yes, that was Bluford. Challenger STS-8.
Announcing “Let’s light this candle “reveals an unhealthy disrespect for risk. And “Not quite inflated” was a lie. Maybe, “Won’t quite inflate” would apply, though.
3 mistakes in the first line....."In a shicking turn of evnets" , third was me watching 2 minutes of the carnival.
Riding in a tin can doesn't make them any more of an astronaut than me riding a jet makes me a pilot. Those people are probably still hurting from that landing. The FAA should put a longer hold on human spaceflight on Blue Origin than the last pause. Ridiculous.
"Those people are probably still hurting from that landing".
You are making an assumption without any evidence!!
Was that in slow motion, or a really slow rocket?
Obviously, any failure needs to be investigated and corrected, but when you've designed a system with at least one-third redundancy, it's not a disaster when it occurs.
I like the ending with the older black astronaut saying. "It's a life changing experience. Everybody needs to do this."
When is this deathtrap scheduled to fly next?
yikes! I wouldn't wanna be on it if they paid me for the ride.
The Blue Origin capsule was *designed* to land safely with only two parachutes open. In this case, the third parachute did not fail, but did not fully open. This sort of thing happened in the Apollo program (Apollo 15's splashdown) and on a SpaceX Dragon flight, but in both cases, this still resulted in safe landings. The problem definitely needs to be looked into, but there was no "Panic" or "heart-stopping drama".
Yeah a lot of the people in this comment section either don’t know what they are talking about or are just here to laugh at a rich CEO. They aren’t actually interested in spaceflight.
Hard landing. How many Gs at landing? Nobody got hurt at landing impact?
PSA: Another crackerjack follow up video on the Blue Origin parachute malfunction by @Pointorview. Now on the channel. NEAR MISS: Blue Origin's NS-25 parachute failure heightens landing risks... th-cam.com/video/c7iLkCibbzw/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pWflNncQJu8IAsaW
Just one bad parachute spoils the bunch...
One of the Apollo missions, I believe Apollo 15, had one of its three main parachutes fail to open during landing. The landing system had the redundancy to accommodate this possibility, as apparently the New Shepard had as well.
At least water gives a little when they impact. Somewhere on that flying bucket is a device that measures the g force of its impact, that was a "hard landing".
Today if you say it over and over you will start believing your own nonsense.
Can you imagine the state of mind of the astronauts. 😄
astronauts. ???
@@doug8515Space tourists?
They called them astronauts
@@doug8515 hahah i know what you did there:)
@@doug8515 heheehe
OMG, that's worst than whiplash from a near end collision. a great celebration for avoiding death, not a celebration of success, can't believe the irony here.
This whole thing seems so amateurish. It was more fun back is the 60’s and 70’s.
People died and learned hard lessons during 60’s and 70’s so that you could watch this “amateurish” launch. Grow up kid.
@@bob38028 I’m a boomer and you are the kid
@@MarkSmith-js2pu Act like it then and show some respect for the men and women who sacrificed their lives so you could denegrate them online.
@@bob38028 OK, I’ll look at my scrapbooks from the 60’s and 70’s and relive the excitement and dangers those men experienced when it was more fun and the commentators were men who knew what they were talking about, like Julius Bergman and not you.
@@MarkSmith-js2pu Nostalgia is a poison.
Has a lawsuit been filed yet for reckless endangerment? Anyone asking for a refund?
It's cute that she thinks they went into space. LOL
Its how you define space. a karmon line is well excepted threshold and its crosses that no?.
@@slimfoodie9480it does
I Think a few seconds above the Karman Line is a pathetic claim to have been in space.
Anything short of a full orbit and retro burn is a joke.
@@eugenecbell I agree... It's like sticking your head inside someone's front door and then saying: "I've been in your house..." it's just laughable...
This little Dick rocket is just a carnival joy ride for the rich...
Exactly! They are no more astronauts than riding the airline to Texas made them pilots.
Can they send it back to Amazon for a refund?
😄😄
Maybe they will take 1/3 off the tickets.
I predict there will an another "Oceangate-like " / "rich people climbing Everest" style disaster with the amateurish launches...
I hope the effect stays with them and transforms their lives. Also they are civilians and unlike astronauts, can speak freely about their experiences without censure or fear of government or military reprisal.
That rocket looks suspiciously like Bezos.
This is why there is REDUNDANCY, END LANDING VELOCITY is achieved with one two or three chutes, only difference would be the time at which this IS achieved. There is NO SIGNIFICANT touch down velocity difference touching down with three, two, or ONLY ONE, fully deployed parachutes. It is clear that the person posting this video knows little on engineering, and there is a clear intention of creating unnecessary ALARM, GOSSIPING AND DISCREDIT.
Can anyone tell me please? Did the boosters fail on landing?
No booster was fine.
@@PointOrViewat last - thank you.
Duuhhhh. There are multiple chutes exactly for redundancy. ALL current US manned spacecraft land under multiple chutes. Shit happens. Soyouz lands under a SINGLE large chute... no redundancy there. Spaceflight is hard and risky... crew is more than aware of the dangers... but are never taking any unnecesary risk.
I don't consider them astronaut's. Just popping about the carmin line doesn't count.
And by "crew members" we mean wealthy, clueless tourists.
It's difficult to get excited about a new Shepherd launch. It's like cute but have they heard of Spacex?
Hardly a near tragedy. The capsule is designed to safely land with 2 out of 3 chutes. Same thing happened with an Apollo capsule.
Goodness!
Did d retro rockets fire...?..
No
Amazon just lost another of my packages, too.
Blue Origitn.. the new Oceangate?
Shudder! Sure hope not.
That was a hard hit...like a Navy pilot landing...
The 3rd parachute is on his yacht
booster lands wobbly - just sayn -
This title is an exaggeration because the NS-25 is designed to land with just one parachute.
How many tries until reaching the orbit? What a joke. And waste of my time
Is it just me or does this all seem like an expensive carnival ride?
That hit pretty hard!
Didn't come close to "ends in human tragedy" as you say. The design is a go with 2 out.
Woke channel.
Best choice yet with Ed Dwight❣️
It looked like a very Hard landing (fall)
Fearmonger! It was fine with two chutes!
"Let's light this candle?" Welcome to the future 1960's! Ha ha. A failed parachute says safety measures worked. Sure don't want to that third chute to fail.
On another note. Was the girlfriend/fiancee in the picture when they picked the shape of that thing? 😂
The FAA should ground the New Shepard, until the cause of the parachute failure and its remedy is confirmed. Expect at least 6 months before a new launch will be done.
it will be quite safe on one chute.
What a joke! These people are not Astronauts. They took a very expensive joy ride. According to the km shown on the screen they did not reach the Karman Line so they didn’t reach space.
Click bait! There was nothing wrong with 1 parachute malfunctioned. The only regret was that the flight took less than 7 minutes and went nowhere.
But it was still longer then a roller coaster ride at Disneyland.
Cry about it
Nothing wrong with one bad parachute? Are you insane? That was a pretty stout landing, take it from someone with nearly 2000 parachute landings.
Apollo 17 had 1 of its 3 main shoots fail.
Flying on this airborne abortion is akin to going to the Titanic on that bathtub toy ! It's only a matter of time before he kills an entire crew.
I sure hope not and pray that the FAA makes sure NS doesn’t see the light of day until all bugs are fixed and made foolproof.
My only problem with the New Shepard program is the fact that it’s now becoming like taking a ride on a roller coaster to a high altitude. Pay your money take your ride….When is Bezos going to jump to the next stage? If he has any plans of joining Musk, he better get an orbital launch soon. Otherwise this Disney ride should get shelved soon. Believe me, I want to see Jeff succeed, but as every day passes his program is being left in the dust…..unfortunately….
The New Glenn is scheduled to launch in late summer. Of course the date might slip, but that is BO's plan.
Congrats Blue Origin ...ty
Description needs more capital letters.
Will it ever orbit earth?
no. It's not designed for that.
Almost a Mad MIKE moment....
Blah blah blah. Haters! They made it home safely. Enough said.