A HIDDEN Benefit of OPTIMAL Social Security Timing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ค. 2024
  • There are different methods to analyze the optimal time to claim Social Security benefits. Some people calculate the break-even point, while others consider claiming early and investing the difference. Nick Davis suggests that contemplating potential future financial challenges can help in making a more informed decision about when to claim Social Security benefits.
    🔥 GET NICK’S WHITE PAPER here: brindleandbay.com/modern-guar...
    ✏️ LEARN MORE about Brindle & Bay here: www.brindleandbay.com/
    📝 Get NICK’S MEMO at www.newsletter.brindleandbay....
    ___________________________
    🔑 KEY TOPICS
    0:00 - Intro
    2:22 - Case Study
    12:00 - Conclusion
    ___________________________
    💵 ABOUT US
    We're a Frisco, Texas-based independent financial advisory firm serving individuals in several states nationwide. We're here to listen to your needs and guide you through the financial planning process.
    ___________________________
    CONNECT 🤝
    Nick's Newsletter: www.newsletter.brindleandbay....
    Facebook: / brindleandbay
    Instagram: brindleandb...
    Linkedin: / about
    TH-cam: / @brindleandbay
    ___________________________
    CONTACT ☎
    Website:
    Phone: (214) 988-9178
    Email: hello@brindleandbay.com

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @Sylvan_dB
    @Sylvan_dB 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Social Security is longevity insurance, or in other words, insurance providing payments to ensure you will not be broke in old age. With this insurance focus in mind, plan on no Social Security. Delay claiming as long as possible up to age 70. After age 62, if times are getting tough and you need it, then claim SS. Otherwise as you approach age 70 then claim it for the max benefit. If you are married, even more important to wait as long as possible. Or if you are wanting to give away money (while alive or dead) then claiming SS as early as possible might increase the amount you can give away.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said , those who plan or who are able think about doing these things when they can.

  • @bmohan55
    @bmohan55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    EXACTLY! it's better to have more $$ when you need it than to have extra $ when you really don't need it. I'm retiring at 69.5 and even then waiting to 70.

  • @Bill_Woo
    @Bill_Woo 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You've done some great analysis, well qualified (a better word than disclaimed, e.g. "keep in mind that this is only measuring..." or "this may be adversely affected by..."). Good work.
    I wonder about the Smile, You say a decrease of 1% per year, but inflation is more than that, so I was stumbling over whether the 1% is "after" or additive(I know you attempted to reference that very point).

  • @gregm3023
    @gregm3023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    SS Trustee reports funding issue around 2033. Under current law 23% benefit haircut…Means Testing could be implemented and haircut could be larger for those with “Means” (assets and/or income). Cannot model mathematically as we do not know future policy but a definite consideration in the decision

  • @MikeTerry1969
    @MikeTerry1969 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Who gets $6,000 a month in social security. I've never heard anyone getting that much.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Both spouses combined.

  • @muth1997
    @muth1997 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    all of these experts ignore the utility of the money and when its drawn. money drawn in ones 60s and early 70s is much more valuable to that average person than money in their 80s

  • @CvonEssen
    @CvonEssen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    First time viewer, great presentation style!

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you kindly!

  • @rayanderson3164
    @rayanderson3164 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you. This was well thought out and presented. You touched on the lower earning spouse still collecting at 62. Is this usually or always the better case for most people? I am looking at this from a decent pension income and one spouse having earned 10X what the other did (they were home often and worked part time later on -Raising children, which was far more important to us). Thanks again.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I need to be careful to not give specific advice on this channel , in general, if the lower earning spouse is done earning (avoid earnings test), then it makes sense for one person to claim early… but not in every situation.

  • @davidfolts5893
    @davidfolts5893 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Social Security is the base from which all other retirement income planning should be considered. That's why it's called a leg in the stool of retirement planning.

  • @bowl816
    @bowl816 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A big factor to me is the 50% withheld when you earn too much taking SS prior to your FRA.
    I see longevity in my family and currently in my mid 60’s, I plan to retire when I am 67. No income limit and I can also draw SS that January. Most people don’t even mention that. A double income my final year of working! If money is tight, I started drawing at age 66 and some months. If I chose to continue working, it’s a double income as long as I want to work. It then pushes out that “break even” point beyond 82 for me.
    I feel it’s important to be debt free when we retire. No house or car notes.
    There is talk of potentially getting a retirement package when I am planning to retire. If I take a jibe somewhere else, I could triple dip in the income pool for a year.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for commenting!

  • @jaymetheaccountant
    @jaymetheaccountant 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I was just watching a video on this topic. Has me thinking I will delay until FRA

  • @steverunswithscissors
    @steverunswithscissors 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Was taxation considered in the modeling? Once the high earner passes the taxation could be increased significantly for the survivor.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are correct and good point. No, this model tests total gross spending because its priority is to measure spending capacity within a specified level of risk of depleting the portfolio.

  • @johngill2853
    @johngill2853 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The spending smile is misleading too most people
    It's a statistic that is only as relevant as the study relates to you. Not all studies are including your situation
    For example the spending smile applies more to high net worth individuals than lower income individuals

  • @petemorton8403
    @petemorton8403 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Always take at 62. If a question, just invest the payment. It will grow probably more.

  • @roseanntrotta911
    @roseanntrotta911 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello Mr. Nick - Interesting concept and will look at your white paper. I would seem that waiting until 70 to Social Security (ignoring break-even) would give you greater annual capacity for total spending dollars especially during downturns in the economy, recessions or stagnation. Would you consider doing a more detailed video on full retirement age and 70? Thanks and great Job on the video.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will do! And thank you for the feedback.

  • @joeplacetas1
    @joeplacetas1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Question,,after you get a social security desabibility report review, do they still send you a letter, even though you have a online account,,the reason i ask its because i can't get into my ss online account since i changed phones..

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You might need to wait a few days and answer their security prompts to get access again.

  • @dipaknadkarni62
    @dipaknadkarni62 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My question.
    My wife died on active duty while we were in the Navy.
    When I reached age 62, I was allowed to take survivor benefits.
    I approach age 64 in Aug/2024.
    I could take my FRA SS at age 67, or age 70.
    I do receive retirement income from the Navy after nearly 30 years on active duty.
    Better to take my own at age 67 or age 70.
    I also have funds invested.
    Thanks.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for the question and your service. I can’t give specific advice on this channel beyond general education- but a question that may get you closer to your answer is “who am I delaying my social security for?” That being said , the principle from the video will probably still be true- more SS helps during the worst times. Yet- the difference in benefits felt (by waiting)may be less impactful or relevant.

  • @UrR2KBA
    @UrR2KBA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Id rather have it when I can enjoy it at 65. Are you going to make it to 80? Also COLA helps with inflation. If you haven’t planned and are without substantial retirement accounts then maybe wait.

  • @realbsy2
    @realbsy2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both my spouse and I our now retired and never paid so much for healthcare between our private insurances and reap off Medicare payments.must also consider this😂?!

  • @steves3234
    @steves3234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My view is I want to optimize the highest about in later years since I have cash flow now.

  • @mikeanderson2655
    @mikeanderson2655 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could also look at the impacts of RMDs on their $1.5 M of pre-tax assets at age 75. Spending assets down early by not drawing SS until 70 helps.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very common tax planning strategy. Thanks for pointing that out !

  • @BarakTheWonderer
    @BarakTheWonderer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why 62, 67 and 70? Why was the option of 65 not included? Thank you.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Good question. Because 65 is not anyone’s full retirement age. However, the principle would still apply, ie. 65 would provide more resilience protection in bad times than say age 62.

  • @Bagsn86
    @Bagsn86 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If your spouse will only receive half your benefit does it pay to wait after 67 since her benefit will not increase any further?

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hypothetically, your PIA will still grow and increase her half/part (depending on if she takes it early or waits.)

  • @great-garden-watch
    @great-garden-watch 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    80 is not worth it because youll spend a bit more in younger retirement…i.e. at 70 go travel with the higher ss income

  • @bobbiejean3346
    @bobbiejean3346 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would have never taken it if they were going to take money what is it a dollar or two dollars for every dollar you make over a certain amount I'm trying to encourage my friend to get it now and may not be around when he's 70

  • @thomasmoshier3920
    @thomasmoshier3920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unless you’re in poor health there’s no real reason to take SS early. The question then becomes SS at FRA or 70. With 70 being prudent for the highest bread winner. However if the market takes a sudden down turn and you have an unfavorable sequence of returns. Then it might make more sense to take SS before 70. Giving the markets and your IRA time to recover before RMD’s kick in at 73 or 75. It really depends on sequence of returns between 67 and 70.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for commenting!

  • @jaypaladin-havesmartswilll5508
    @jaypaladin-havesmartswilll5508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Top 2 criteria is your financial health and physical health. If both physical and financial health are good then I will delay taking my social security until 67 or 70 and if married then the breadwinner will delay taking the SS. If there is a bear financial market when I initially retire then I will modify my spending to draw down as little of my funds as possible without downgrading my standard of living.

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds like a plan!

  • @jasonbroom7147
    @jasonbroom7147 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Desired, planned lifestyle." One of the foundational keys to financial success is living within a budget. If you haven't been doing that, and refuse to do that during retirement, then your odds of living a calm, peaceful financial plan during retirement are severely compromised. If you understand what a budget is, and can follow one, then 90% of what you talk about in this video is just that...talk. If you want to have a REAL discussion, mention how the SS surplus runs out in 8 years or so, and then they will only pay out around 78% of the promised benefit. SS has always been a huge rip-off to working class people, but it's going to get even worse.

  • @user-to4gx5oz1f
    @user-to4gx5oz1f 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I’m still working and taking social security stack it deep age 69

  • @kevincross1240
    @kevincross1240 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you're married, you have to consider the effect of the age you begin to collect social security and your spouse

  • @adblas2222
    @adblas2222 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Take it at 66, if you are still working. Invest it or pay off debt, if needed. Don’t forget you have to pay tax on this income, too.

  • @gregb6829
    @gregb6829 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well you've got to be healthy enough to make it to 67. If you can avoid cancer car accidents and cardiovascular disease then of course it makes sense. But if you have any health conditions or you live a dangerous lifestyle take the money when you can

    • @brindleandbay
      @brindleandbay  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, life expectancy does play into the decision!

  • @anonsam7633
    @anonsam7633 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Most people are dying early. Let's see if you are a public employee you can retire at 55 and get full pension. If you are the average Joe by the late 50's you pray to God you make it to 62. Because your back is wacked and your crippled.

  • @scottprice4813
    @scottprice4813 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Math is the most poorly taught subject in the US . That’s easy to confirm when you see the huge percentage that take social security at 62.

  • @MissLibertarian
    @MissLibertarian 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In economics we talk about “opportunity cost.” I took mine at the earliest moment because inflation of the currency supply is expected to become a hyperinflation event as the dollar dies, and the sooner dollars will buy a lot more gold and silver than the later dollars. When economic laws are in play worldwide and can’t be stopped, it’s time to take cover.
    Some seniors may want to get a reverse mortgage while they can and have a few ounces of gold to pay the taxes, insurance, and remaining balance. It won’t take much if you buy real money with bad currency, now, and can wait for a historical-scale blink of an eye.
    Real social security is, and always was, loving friends and family. Government programs have no tender mercies and a reputation for breaking contracts and other promises.

  • @bobbiejean3346
    @bobbiejean3346 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My birth year is 1954. 6 months before I turn 65 I was able to apply and get full benefits. I also have degenerative thoracic cervical disc disease. Well that's too bad because at age 65. I guess I shot myself in the foot on not entitled to any SSDI. But they can give it all to the illegals because that's next

  • @Lobsterman5481
    @Lobsterman5481 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another way to keep us poor.
    I want to retire at 65 not at 66 and 10 months.