Mark, you are way off on the interview. She arrived late and all she did was grandstand. Was not interested in providing real answers for people begging for policy clarity. There was no accountability and her handlers ended the interview early.
@@ftworthtexan9082 With Kamala it was SSDD (Same Stuff, Different Day) There may be a reason she doesn't really answer questions. Maybe She Doesn't Know. I've read she doesn't Do The Work. Read her briefing papers. She's lazy.
Was the interviewer supposed to let her rumble on and on with a non-answer? NO! She was was regurgitating the same stuff...it is just painful to watch......Kamala is an empty suit. She cant engage on a topic beyond what she has memorized. This charade needs to be stopped.
Kermala's interview on Fox was a waste of time in terms of substance. Good questions were asked but none were answered. Kermala is insincere, incompetent and often incoherent.
@@GlorifiedG-z9c Trump was absolutely wasted by my Hispanic brethren and sisters during that Univision town hall. His campaign cancelled another interview after the debacle. Cope!
@@auntiez4917 Again , is that what the video is about ? Some people like to use the word "comprehensive". Do you comprehend this video is not about Trumps interview. I'm sure there are a few , maybe you could find one.
Very painfull to watch... Harris comes across as an angry, insecure, defensive, arrogant wannabe who refuses to answer important questions. Her whiney voice alone makes me cringe!
Democrat media has NO standing to claim Bret was “contentious” when they treat former President and VP interviews is the same manner to “protect democracy”
Great credit to Brett Baier. He's dropped off a lot of invite lists and is now persona non grata in the DC chattering class but clearly he thought it was worth the sacrifice for journalist integrity and informing the American people. So rare to see a man of character in the public spotlight nowadays
I disagree with Mark: Harris' plan was to filibuster with prepared statements, and not answer a single question. Brett had no choice but to interrupt her.
For us undecided (actually just decided & mailed in the other day) swing state voters that care about ANY issue other than "TRUMP BAD", this interview just drove the point home that this woman is completely and utterly substance-less.
No one gives any deference to Trump as a former president. Bret did well, especially considering her lateness, rudeness, refusal to answer any questions. Mark, you’re just wrong.
Tone and manner? Do you hear yourself Mark? The Vice President doesn’t deserve anything, she is just another person, not the queen. If you can’t answer a question that has absolutely nothing to do with Trump without invoking Trump, you are losing. She didn’t clear up any questions that needed to be answered
I disagree with some of your commentary. Kamala did not answer a single question she should have expected and again couldn't answer. I also completely disagree that Bret was rude. He was doing his job by stopping her word salads and non-answers. She blames Trump for the border? What a joke. She's been the Vice-President for the last three and a half years. How is this Trump's fault. I don't think that this is a winning strategy. She's abysmal.
Bret biggest missed opportunity: when KH said Joe Biden was ‘fully cognizant and in charge’ was to say, “if he was doing so well, why is he not the candidate on the ballot instead of you?”
What?? Bret was rude? come on! She was basically talking over him and what was that shouting? Where were such strong emotions on the girls? Pathetic take.
Great show as usual. As a Dem supporter..I value Sean’s straight forward & objective input. Keeps me sober. Dan is very good as well. This is the best platform for an analysis of the race..as it stands at the current time. Kudos to Mark.
Gentlemen, you do realize that as insider's you look at the minutiae. We as outsiders look at our conditions on the ground. We have our core values and vote for the person who represents those values 😊
Strong Trump voter here, really appreciate all three of you guys for dispassionate analysis. Dan is a slightly more analytical guy than Sean, which I do appreciate because I want to know how the other side thinks. Mark, how do you think Mike Wallace would have handled Kamala last night? I think he would have crushed her.
I think Bret was not strong enough. Her goal was to filibuster and not answer any direct questions and totally drive the anti-Trump narrative to her benefit. Not engaging in commonly understood communication etiquette by responding w/answers to questions is disrespectful by itself. The Premise was not to come on the show and have free rain to do a political commercial on Fox bashing Trump and side stepping any accountability on her behalf. I think for her campaign, it was perceived as a win. She managed to get away without answering any direct questions and she was able to reinforce the anti-Trump fear agenda. that’s all she has. That’s all they got so that’s one point for them. For Brett and the fox Network that’s one last point for them for letting it happen
@@johnmartinezm I care less about the dopey feces slingers. But the premeditated false elector coup by the GOP cabal is the real crime. We won’t let you sweep it under the rug.
Agree - I'm Gen X and even I have switched to nearly all of TH-cam and podcasts because establishment media is just partisan talking points (mostly on Dem side but Fox News on the right). My college grad kids (mid-20s) are even less interested in establishment media. They told me who PBD and Theo Von was, and that is including my daughter.
Enjoy the channel. Mark, why are you always rushing Sean and Dan? I want to hear their opinions! That's the whole draw of the show. This isn't primetime, everything doesn't have to be rushed and clipped. The audience talking is boring! I try to watch but them but always drop off when they come on. Let Sean and Dan talk 10x more than you are!
Maybe she’s preparing to be president and working on the campaign. I know somebody else who had endless hours of “executive time” & golf -while ON THE JOB-were you OK with that? I sure was-the less he did the the less damage done,the better off we were
Harris and her SF click have ruined Calif. I know. I live here and try to run a small business. Tired of the inappropriate behavior on our streets, in our schools and struggling to make ends meet. Calif is great for the wealthy .. poor and middle class not so much.
Kamala Harris‘s performance during the Fox News interview was so atrocious and obvious to everybody, that Mark downplaying it, makes you wonder whether he has been so stung by the accusations that his podcast is pro Trump (which it isn’t) that he feels like he now has to backtrack and go the other way. No other explanation for why Mark would curiously take the position that Kamala didn’t do that bad. You’re better than that Mark. Don’t do the Jerry Seinfeld thing, that he just did a few days ago, groveling back to the left wingers regarding his previous, truthful comments about them. Integrity, much?
We need a REAL filibuster again! Make these mokes put skin in the game, not just dial it in. Mark- if dragging feet egregiously on garland was not against historical precedent- what the hell was jamming Barrett through at 11th hour?
Anyone (looking at you today, Margaret) who still persists in mispronouncing her name never gave her a fair shake. It’s a tell. I miss Mark calling everyone on it, but so it goes. Dan is right about Baier- The FOX viewers hate him-he was shoring up his job there. I also suspect Biden has never been as bad as he was in the fatal debate. He hasn’t been since either- though it’s clear he’s in decline. As is his nemesis. I’ll take benevolent decline over malicious decline any day. But I’m sure not looking forward to the immanent 39-year-old hillbilly hedge fund revenge regime. “Leon”, Theil, Roberts, Leo ? 😮
Just to note, the participant from Colorado who talked about changing the filibuster threshold to 60% was right, whether or not intentionally. The threshold was 2/3 for a very long time.
Harry Reid is responsible for the Dobbs decision. He allowed for Supreme Court confirmations to be a simple 51/49 majority. This allowed Trump to appoint the three justices he did. So you can thank a democrat for Roe V Wade being overturned.
@@seanhartel5362incorrect. Harry Reid dropped it to 51 for appellate judges but not Supreme Court judges. McConnell warned him not to do it but he did it anyway. Then McConnell lowered it to 51 for Supreme Court judges. I believe I’m correct but forgive me if I’m wrong.
@@caseyking0917 you are partially correct. Harry Reid laid out that precedent in the first place to ram through legislation. McConnell warned him not to, then responded in kind, extending the nuclear option to Supreme Court confirmations in 2017. So without Reid’s actions, it’s highly unlikely the nuclear option would have been used by McConnell or any other majority leader.
One of the few Constitutional duties of a Vice President is to step forward when the President is incapacitated, as described in the 25th amendment. In my opinion, Harris shirked her duty.
This show is turning into a daily "here's everything Harris did wrong" program, meanwhile Trump gets a pass on his light schedules and terrible non answers lol... And yet this reflects the polls honestly so that's where the rest of America is
RBG was no fan of ROE. Don't mislead. And remember E Warren shrieking 'the Republicans have been working for this for seventy years' so spare me that one.
Oh, Dan...Lauren, with her librarian glasses and sliding barn door decor screamed latte liberal and then proved it. She, like you are having some of your illusions shattered on this platform
Mark is a liberal democrat that is better than most politicians at spinning things. He has brilliant level of skillset to spin. I am at a loss for ideas why the democratic party isn't using him to help them. I'm a super hyper conservative and I respect Mark. I'd vote for Mark if he ever ran in my state because he's not crazy but he is a liberal.
I thought Harris did fine and showed some fight. I was disappointed in Brett Baier's first question: "How many illegal migrants did you release into the country?" What a loaded and biased way to lead off the interview!
@@GlorifiedG-z9c She likely has some idea... but it's not a constructive question. Imagine a journalist asking Trump: "How many grandmas died during COVID? Please provide an exact number."
@@boosterblader3209 I agree, it's not constructive to admit she and her boss let in 10 million unvetted people for the average American to have to encounter. Does the WH let in unvetted people nilly willy ?
It WASN'T a real border bill and Republicans have a real border bill stuck on Shumer's desk without a vote. Trump closed the border as much as he could using existing legislation and Biden/Harris reversed his border directives on day-one letting MILLIONs of illegals in at American's expense.
Mark, Sadly you have bias in your statement that the VP deserved a certain amount of decorum by the interviewer. How quickly you forget the decorum showed to PRESIDENT Trump not only during his presidency but his entire time on the political stage. Here's a clip to remind you of what President Trump faced every day from the press & democrats, please be fair and balanced in your analysis. th-cam.com/video/zdFe-LmFRV8/w-d-xo.html
Sean overlooks something about the Fox interview. It's not for a constituency who will not vote for her. It's directed at her own voters and those who may have doubts about her ability to handle a, we'll say, unfriendly interviewer. I'm not a Fox viewer, but I was watching. It's incredible that Harris is where she's at with a campaign that began a little over two months ago. We all don't want to hurt Biden's feelings, but Dems are with Harris. Let's win this thing.
Yes. It’s incredible that a candidate with 94% positive news coverage, absolutely zero critical coverage until yesterday, no reporting of her many controversies, and total control of all federal, academic, communications and entertainment institutions, fanatically supported by the most mentally ill segments of the population (see Pew, Harris) is still losing.
Kamala is a skilled former prosecutor. She’s begun her closing argument and I believe it will move the needle for her. Time for a relentless ground game to GOTV 💙
Mark, you are way off on the interview. She arrived late and all she did was grandstand. Was not interested in providing real answers for people begging for policy clarity. There was no accountability and her handlers ended the interview early.
100% spot on!!
@@ftworthtexan9082
With Kamala it was SSDD (Same Stuff, Different Day)
There may be a reason she doesn't really answer questions. Maybe She Doesn't Know. I've read she doesn't Do The Work. Read her briefing papers. She's lazy.
Mark is usually right, but is 100% wrong on the Kamala interview - brutal to watch
Was the interviewer supposed to let her rumble on and on with a non-answer? NO! She was was regurgitating the same stuff...it is just painful to watch......Kamala is an empty suit. She cant engage on a topic beyond what she has memorized. This charade needs to be stopped.
Kermala's interview on Fox was a waste of time in terms of substance. Good questions were asked but none were answered. Kermala is insincere, incompetent and often incoherent.
Did you see Trump's interview with Hispanics last night 😆😆😆😆??? Wow!
@@auntiez4917 Is that what this video is about ? No , no it's not.
@@GlorifiedG-z9c Trump was absolutely wasted by my Hispanic brethren and sisters during that Univision town hall. His campaign cancelled another interview after the debacle. Cope!
@@kittybreath Establishment GOP voters who r on the fence about voting for Trump give her good marks on the interview. Cope!
@@auntiez4917 Again , is that what the video is about ? Some people like to use the word "comprehensive". Do you comprehend this video is not about Trumps interview. I'm sure there are a few , maybe you could find one.
Very painfull to watch... Harris comes across as an angry, insecure, defensive, arrogant wannabe who refuses to answer important questions. Her whiney voice alone makes me cringe!
Ooooh so the angry black woman. GTFOH. Seriously.
@@toploadtele No she was not insecure, not angry, not arrogant, etc.. she was tough and honest and it had to hurt watching her prove Fox wrong.
@@acefstripeha ha ha
typical bigoted response to women running
you just want to make her an angry black woman. Does it not get old for you?
Democrat media has NO standing to claim Bret was “contentious” when they treat former President and VP interviews is the same manner to “protect democracy”
The Nation need protection from the press and democrats (but I repeat myself)
Great credit to Brett Baier. He's dropped off a lot of invite lists and is now persona non grata in the DC chattering class but clearly he thought it was worth the sacrifice for journalist integrity and informing the American people. So rare to see a man of character in the public spotlight nowadays
It’s incredible she blamed Trump for the last four years while she’s in office.
Most jaw dropping moment of the interview for me. Blaming everything on Trump while not taking accountability for one thing.
I disagree with Mark: Harris' plan was to filibuster with prepared statements, and not answer a single question. Brett had no choice but to interrupt her.
I have no idea what anyone watched. I thought she bombed terribly
yeah absolutely brtual
It was absolutely horrible
That's because you live in a bubble.
That's because you live in a bubble.
@@tedmarley4341 Sounds like you live in an echo ted.
For us undecided (actually just decided & mailed in the other day) swing state voters that care about ANY issue other than "TRUMP BAD", this interview just drove the point home that this woman is completely and utterly substance-less.
That Fox interview might not have change anything, but accelerated her decline !
To the MAGA crowd. But that wasn't the goal. Please don't type anything else sir.
@@Pestcontrolguy24Triggered by truth? Democrat found 😂😂😂😂
Ok foxnews
No one gives any deference to Trump as a former president. Bret did well, especially considering her lateness, rudeness, refusal to answer any questions. Mark, you’re just wrong.
Dan does have a great smile! He’s wonderful, although I often disagree with him, I enjoy his rational take. Please keep him around!
She did not answer a single question
Tone and manner? Do you hear yourself Mark? The Vice President doesn’t deserve anything, she is just another person, not the queen.
If you can’t answer a question that has absolutely nothing to do with Trump without invoking Trump, you are losing.
She didn’t clear up any questions that needed to be answered
Brett is so polite compared to other interviewers
She’s done and we’re done with her!
Please don't storm the capitol sir
I disagree with some of your commentary. Kamala did not answer a single question she should have expected and again couldn't answer. I also completely disagree that Bret was rude. He was doing his job by stopping her word salads and non-answers. She blames Trump for the border? What a joke. She's been the Vice-President for the last three and a half years. How is this Trump's fault. I don't think that this is a winning strategy. She's abysmal.
Pretty clear, her position is that she will leave the border open.
I think Sean always has the most accurate take
😂😂😂😂 try again
@@Pestcontrolguy24 I think Sean Spicer has the most accurate takes.
Bret biggest missed opportunity: when KH said Joe Biden was ‘fully cognizant and in charge’ was to say, “if he was doing so well, why is he not the candidate on the ballot instead of you?”
What?? Bret was rude? come on! She was basically talking over him and what was that shouting? Where were such strong emotions on the girls? Pathetic take.
Great show as usual. As a Dem supporter..I value Sean’s straight forward & objective input. Keeps me sober. Dan is very good as well. This is the best platform for an analysis of the race..as it stands at the current time. Kudos to Mark.
NO LAUGHING KAMALA. No, she is sporting her early Maxine Waters look.
Gentlemen, you do realize that as insider's you look at the minutiae. We as outsiders look at our conditions on the ground. We have our core values and vote for the person who represents those values 😊
Strong Trump voter here, really appreciate all three of you guys for dispassionate analysis. Dan is a slightly more analytical guy than Sean, which I do appreciate because I want to know how the other side thinks.
Mark, how do you think Mike Wallace would have handled Kamala last night? I think he would have crushed her.
I really appreciate the healthy dialogue between the two sides. Thank you for keeping it respectful. You guys are great!
Wow Mark doesn’t know who PBD and EWTN are? That’s a major tell as to where he leans politically.
Yep. Which is why he lets nonsensical TDS narratives fly sometimes. But he's better than most I guess.
I think Bret was not strong enough. Her goal was to filibuster and not answer any direct questions and totally drive the anti-Trump narrative to her benefit.
Not engaging in commonly understood communication etiquette by responding w/answers to questions is disrespectful by itself.
The Premise was not to come on the show and have free rain to do a political commercial on Fox bashing Trump and side stepping any accountability on her behalf.
I think for her campaign, it was perceived as a win. She managed to get away without answering any direct questions and she was able to reinforce the anti-Trump fear agenda. that’s all she has. That’s all they got so that’s one point for them.
For Brett and the fox Network that’s one last point for them for letting it happen
Then why sis the team cut the interview in a panic if they saw it as a win? Her last reply was utter gibberish.
I love this show. You guys are the best!
Jan 6th. I wish people would look into what went on that day. It’s not black and white .. it was not an insurrection
@@johnmartinezm I care less about the dopey feces slingers. But the premeditated false elector coup by the GOP cabal is the real crime. We won’t let you sweep it under the rug.
I love how Sean came with that spice yesterday 👍💪
I see what you did there
95 THOUSAND people watching PBD and Trump. Mark, gotta get up to speed on non Establishment/Neolib Media - Old school Dem here
Agree - I'm Gen X and even I have switched to nearly all of TH-cam and podcasts because establishment media is just partisan talking points (mostly on Dem side but Fox News on the right). My college grad kids (mid-20s) are even less interested in establishment media. They told me who PBD and Theo Von was, and that is including my daughter.
Mark's POV on this Fox interview is SO biased wth!? So what about Trump's treatment? We JUST want the SAME standards for BOTH sides!
Has Lauren Leader made a statement declaring that Kamala's dodging of the Al Smith dinner is due to sexism?
Let me be clear….and she’s never clear.
Enjoy the channel. Mark, why are you always rushing Sean and Dan? I want to hear their opinions! That's the whole draw of the show. This isn't primetime, everything doesn't have to be rushed and clipped. The audience talking is boring! I try to watch but them but always drop off when they come on. Let Sean and Dan talk 10x more than you are!
I'm always irritated you're rushing Sean and Dan because I want to hear what they have to say. And for what? Why rush them.
Interesting, she starts her day in the afternoon 🧐
Maybe she’s preparing to be president and working on the campaign. I know somebody else who had endless hours of “executive time” & golf -while ON THE JOB-were you OK with that?
I sure was-the less he did the the less damage done,the better off we were
Harris and her SF click have ruined Calif. I know. I live here and try to run a small business. Tired of the inappropriate behavior on our streets, in our schools and struggling to make ends meet. Calif is great for the wealthy .. poor and middle class not so much.
Kamala Harris‘s performance during the Fox News interview was so atrocious and obvious to everybody, that Mark downplaying it, makes you wonder whether he has been so stung by the accusations that his podcast is pro Trump (which it isn’t) that he feels like he now has to backtrack and go the other way. No other explanation for why Mark would curiously take the position that Kamala didn’t do that bad. You’re better than that Mark. Don’t do the Jerry Seinfeld thing, that he just did a few days ago, groveling back to the left wingers regarding his previous, truthful comments about them. Integrity, much?
He literally sounds insane.
Ok foxnews
We need a REAL filibuster again! Make these mokes put skin in the game, not just dial it in.
Mark- if dragging feet egregiously on garland was not against historical precedent- what the hell was jamming Barrett through at 11th hour?
Dan, is fair and respectful
that he is
Anyone (looking at you today, Margaret) who still persists in mispronouncing her name never gave her a fair shake. It’s a tell. I miss Mark calling everyone on it, but so it goes.
Dan is right about Baier-
The FOX viewers hate him-he was shoring up his job there. I also suspect Biden has never been as bad as he was in the fatal debate. He hasn’t been since either- though it’s clear he’s in decline. As is his nemesis.
I’ll take benevolent decline over malicious decline any day.
But I’m sure not looking forward to the immanent 39-year-old hillbilly hedge fund revenge regime. “Leon”, Theil, Roberts, Leo ? 😮
Good balance today, nice work everyone.
Comey showed up late too, same tactic. Running late my a**
He was not super aggressive. He was not aggressive enough
She just isn't ready for the most important job in the world. And the people aren't ready for her
Brett was not at all rude!
Kamala keeps saying trump trump trump trump trump………..Trump trump trump……..
At this point a gap in a candidate’s schedule may mean a Rogan appearance 😉
Just watched the Patrick Bet David interview. It was a good interview and with well thought out questions. The last 5 min was emotional.
Why would she even go on Fox? She has no answers for anything.
so she could say she went into the belly of the beast, and conquered it
@@GlorifiedG-z9c no answers is conquering? Bar lowered.
David from Delaware was Deluuuuuusional
Just to note, the participant from Colorado who talked about changing the filibuster threshold to 60% was right, whether or not intentionally. The threshold was 2/3 for a very long time.
Harry Reid is responsible for the Dobbs decision. He allowed for Supreme Court confirmations to be a simple 51/49 majority. This allowed Trump to appoint the three justices he did. So you can thank a democrat for Roe V Wade being overturned.
@@seanhartel5362incorrect. Harry Reid dropped it to 51 for appellate judges but not Supreme Court judges. McConnell warned him not to do it but he did it anyway. Then McConnell lowered it to 51 for Supreme Court judges. I believe I’m correct but forgive me if I’m wrong.
@@caseyking0917 you are partially correct. Harry Reid laid out that precedent in the first place to ram through legislation. McConnell warned him not to, then responded in kind, extending the nuclear option to Supreme Court confirmations in 2017. So without Reid’s actions, it’s highly unlikely the nuclear option would have been used by McConnell or any other majority leader.
@@seanhartel5362 thanks for the clarification. Very eloquently stated.
Thanks guys.. great points 👍👍
David another typical middle of the road democrat who would vote for any dem
One of the few Constitutional duties of a Vice President is to step forward when the President is incapacitated, as described in the 25th amendment. In my opinion, Harris shirked her duty.
This show is turning into a daily "here's everything Harris did wrong" program, meanwhile Trump gets a pass on his light schedules and terrible non answers lol... And yet this reflects the polls honestly so that's where the rest of America is
im afraid you might be wrong with everything you said
PBD is Iranian American too!
she has said she will sign the bill that Trump knocked for immigration- also what about Fox editing Trump interview
Is there anyone who saw David and did not know immediately he was voting for Harris? Anyone?
@@jamieorye4752 that’s not the slur you think it is
RBG was no fan of ROE. Don't mislead. And remember E Warren shrieking 'the Republicans have been working for this for seventy years' so spare me that one.
Oh, Dan...Lauren, with her librarian glasses and sliding barn door decor screamed latte liberal and then proved it. She, like you are having some of your illusions shattered on this platform
Wow, marks remarks are unbelievable, she didn’t answer questions
The presidential campaigns need to hire the Harmon Brothers 😂 (marketers of Squatty Potty, Poo-Pourri, etc.).
I agree with Sean, Nevada is certainly a challenge for Republicans. ….Especially, Clark County.
What a shame , old west town turned to crap
Trump has had some great ads
Mark is a liberal democrat that is better than most politicians at spinning things. He has brilliant level of skillset to spin. I am at a loss for ideas why the democratic party isn't using him to help them.
I'm a super hyper conservative and I respect Mark. I'd vote for Mark if he ever ran in my state because he's not crazy but he is a liberal.
Wait i thought she wasnt doing enough interviews. Where is the fake outrage?
Cognitively, neither Trump nor Biden should not be running. We all can see it. But Trump gets a pass.
no reasonable person would compare trump to biden , im afraid you are unable to be honest in your political analysis
Her plan was to posture and perform for her TDS base.
It was kinda fun to see Dan with his moxy up, mirroring her campaign. It was MORE fun to see him slide from there to nearly crestfallen
Thank god! They didn’t let garland! On the supreme court
She doesn’t say how she would be different from Biden.
possibly never considered it because being led around is so much easier and affords more free time to do nothing
Trump never says he lost the ,2020 election. What's your point
“Guess what” is Helen from Colorado actually Joe Biden’s long lost daughter 😂😂😂
The difference in patience and inquisitiveness between the show guests and the people in the comment section is stark.
Mark, cover that Pelosi wouldn’t take calls from head for security
I thought Harris did fine and showed some fight. I was disappointed in Brett Baier's first question: "How many illegal migrants did you release into the country?" What a loaded and biased way to lead off the interview!
I agree..but not surprising in the least. Playing to his audience.
Why wouldn't she have any idea of the numbers ?
@@GlorifiedG-z9c She likely has some idea... but it's not a constructive question. Imagine a journalist asking Trump: "How many grandmas died during COVID? Please provide an exact number."
Here’s a number .. 300,000. How can an administration let in that many children unaccompanied over our border and not know where they are ???
@@boosterblader3209 I agree, it's not constructive to admit she and her boss let in 10 million unvetted people for the average American to have to encounter. Does the WH let in unvetted people nilly willy ?
I blame Global Warming
This is a good show
Mark, really?? Brett was fair and didn't kiss her you know what
she has said she will sign the bill that Trump knocked fown
It WASN'T a real border bill and Republicans have a real border bill stuck on Shumer's desk without a vote. Trump closed the border as much as he could using existing legislation and Biden/Harris reversed his border directives on day-one letting MILLIONs of illegals in at American's expense.
Mark, Sadly you have bias in your statement that the VP deserved a certain amount of decorum by the interviewer. How quickly you forget the decorum showed to PRESIDENT Trump not only during his presidency but his entire time on the political stage. Here's a clip to remind you of what President Trump faced every day from the press & democrats, please be fair and balanced in your analysis. th-cam.com/video/zdFe-LmFRV8/w-d-xo.html
Sean overlooks something about the Fox interview. It's not for a constituency who will not vote for her. It's directed at her own voters and those who may have doubts about her ability to handle a, we'll say, unfriendly interviewer. I'm not a Fox viewer, but I was watching. It's incredible that Harris is where she's at with a campaign that began a little over two months ago. We all don't want to hurt Biden's feelings, but Dems are with Harris. Let's win this thing.
Yes. It’s incredible that a candidate with 94% positive news coverage, absolutely zero critical coverage until yesterday, no reporting of her many controversies, and total control of all federal, academic, communications and entertainment institutions, fanatically supported by the most mentally ill segments of the population (see Pew, Harris) is still losing.
Kamala is a skilled former prosecutor. She’s begun her closing argument and I believe it will move the needle for her. Time for a relentless ground game to GOTV 💙
Do you think Kamala wears an earpiece for coaching?
Good question. But I doubt it because nobody could be that bad with an earpiece.
If you are that conspiratorial, you need to get more critical of your own biases.
mark you are way off on the fox interview bud
Karl Rive again- and this is a balanced site- just wrong
Eternal Word Television Network
Home of Mother Angelica😅 best late night tv preacher ever!
How about the nyt coming out saying her plagiarism is serious!!!
Great show
She doesn't answer any questions with straight answers Sean! Stop acting like this is ok!
She wasn't impressive
Yes, Sean, who is Trump going to appoint?
Bret gave her pretty vanilla questions. Most of which could have had easy answers.
If your working for Harris how could you be smart?
It probably pays good, but treacherous like a crab fisherman in the Bering Sea
She bombed 🤯💥
What interview did you watch?
Ok foxnews
The anecdotal may only be people saying I want to get this over with/last minute drops offs are on watch/
Dan is great
Dan - 700 million on ads and billions that could house the homeless as well as the billions wasted on wars
Again Sean, Stop helping Harris