Dr. J Answers | McGrew's Mishap on Paraphrase

Dr. J responds to and critiques Lydia McGrew's criteria of fictionalizing and its application to paraphrase. A conceptual tension exists between them, and her justification for allowing paraphrase (i.e. retaining the meaning) is the same rationale for compositional devices proponents who embrace transferral, displacement, etc. ‪@LydiaMcGrewChannel‬
This is a clip from episode 207 of the Veracity Hill Podcast. View the full episode here:
www.youtube.co...
veracityhill
/ veracityhill
/ veracityhill
To partner with Dr. Jaros, go to www.veracityhill.com/donate

[@joshuawoodin]

IDOL KILLER SENT ME AND I JUST MADE A YT FOLDER OF THIS CHANNEL, AND NOW WILL GOOGLE WHAT Dr J stands for here on Varacity Hill !

[@plumber1874]

Idol killer sent me👍

[@veracityhill]

Glad to have you here!

[@clarkemorledge2398]

Thank you, Dr. J!! This is what frustrates me about Lydia McGrew. She critiques Michael Licona, and then adopts Dr. Licona's same method only using different terminologies to accomplish the same result. This is like a "bait and switch." But she only does so to avoid Licona's argument based on the Greco-Roman "bios" theory for explaining the genre for the Gospels. Frustrating. Frustrating. Frustrating.

[@veracityhill]

Thanks for sharing!