What I enjoy most about Dean is his genius level capacity to explain incredibly complex ideas to the curious layperson. He’s a delight because he is doing exactly what he was born to do - explore, explain and enthuse.
One time I got drugged at a party and I was above myself in the corner of the room but I couldn’t understand who I was looking at or why. I was like who are these people what’s happening here ? Then later on I woke up and I realized it was me that I was looking down on. And I recall being above in the corner of the room and my view from there and everything. I think because it was trauma “I” went outside my body
I do understand his point regarding NDE, but I have had about 4 experiences to date- all different, one SDE, an apparition, etc., but fortunately for me, I was able to objectively confirm. Rushing to see my mother in law and had an apparition at the car window- looked at the clock, and the time coincided with the time of death, as we found out when we arrived. SDE, experience ended-, then the persons’ breath exhaled, one faint pulse, and died. I could go on. Always an objective sign, whether coinciding time, , or pet interest and rigid attention at the location where they were in my view, subsiding as soon as I no longer was aware of their presence. Of course there is more to the stories, but bottom line, I was not the one dying, and I was surprised or possibly skeptical enough to be sure I had objective confirmation. Controlled studies are fascinating, but they ARE controlled and clinical and these kinds of events are spontaneous and unexpected, not easily fit within a laboratory type setting, and frankly only proved to the one experiencing such a profound event. I and many, many others know, and to be honest, that is enough. I do, however, recommend another agnostic view of the subject! 😊
Great interview! I thoroughly enjoyed listening. I think you and I are in similar places in terms of curiosity. I am sharing this with my daughter who has an interest in going back to school and has an undergraduate degree in Psychology.
Dean Radin said there is now to clearly tell if consciousness persist after. He should talk to Dr. Bruce Lipton . His experiment already confirmed what Dean Radin doesn't know. Lipton talks about this experiment in his book biology of belief.
Dean is always so interesting! Oddly, though, I'm shocked he is agnostic as far as after-death experiences and existence. I've had enough experiences where I've seen and remembered other lives, as well as spoken with non-material entities. Maybe he'll come around.
I have also identified as agnostic in the same vein as Radin. It’s really just a way of doggedly avoiding dogma because while we believe (and I’ve had direct experience with paranormal) it’s important to recognize the variance of experience hence “agnostic”.
There are ndes when the person is brain-dead(at times, with no blood in the body) for several minutes during which they can see and learn things they wouldn't have possibly able to.
It’s been recently proven even if you flat line, up to an hour there is actually still brain activity. So the Nde isn’t really being dead…your brain is still active!
Very interesting podcast. I realize science is the know all cause it requires viable proof but faith is not something that can be measured. Or am I not correct in saying that? That said, I found this podcast to be very interesting. Thank you both for sharing. Trey great guest. 💜🌸💜🥰🦋🦋🦋
Hey Antonietta. I think Mr Radin has a very interesting perspective on spiritual phenomena, however, I place more importance on one’s experience than a collection of data taken from samples. There are so many biases out there to account for and not to mention the placebo effect. At the end of the day it should come down to your own personal experience and what lessons you can draw from them.
@@yoursuperiorself Hmm. Can you see that what you are saying might be perceived as undermining your guest? I'm sure Dean's methodology is rigorous enough to account for biases and placebo effect.
@@yoursuperiorself I didn't want him to read it and be disheartened. His work is fascinating. It doesn't prove life after death but suggests something greater than self, and every day experience in the here and now. Which might include survival of consciousness. I agree that individual experience is important. It's probably the most compelling thing we have to shape our beliefs.
If quantum number generators were truly random then how, while we can’t determine which individual photo passes through a polarized lens, can we determine what percent of photos pass? Quantum mechanics is based upon this predictability. Why if we flip a coin, the more we do it the closer to a 50% distribution occurs? Why doesn’t that fluctuate rather than always drive toward an even split?
Idk I've heard Dean on other podcasts and it's a little disappointing to hear that he doesn't really believe but yet is studying it and believes in superhuman abilities and NDE's all around the world. There have been so many NDE's how can he say what he's saying. It's such a dichotomy. HOWEVER, I appreciate his perspective and his skepticism because you need that to be able to convince others once you hit gold to help quell disbelief.
Really good point you’re raising. To me stories about NDE experience are not about proving the validity but how they can inspire people and bring them hope.
The Catholic church has many of such people - the mystic saints who could levitate, etc. There are also those who lived so differently that when they die, they become incorruptible. Now that's even when they've been subjected to moisture and bacteria. In some cases, even the clothes that theu wore remained. You wanna talk about OBE? How about the many Catholic saints who had been seen by witnesses to be in different places at the same times? They bilocated. One of the most fascinating cases of bilocation is that of Venerable Maria Agreda who was in Europe but bilocated and CONVERTED many native Indians in America. The Indians testified of a nun in her habit and they never sent a nun of that congregation there!
Well, people hv ESP has nothingto do with whether christianity is true. Oriental tradition including qigong, yoga, taoist buddhist practice have witnessed so many practitioners performing ESP,
No they have stories that are not true…the whole incorruptible thing…come on they are waxed dipped, some are wax figurines and the decayed body is below in another box.
What if this kind of magic is real...what if its even more true than science...what if science (and it's forbears religious belief and object permanence) is the practical way to suppress that truth so we are more protected from it. Those are my real questions and concern regarding the matter. There is such a thing as too much power. Do we really want to go down that road? Are we responsible or wise enough to ever have that kind of knowledge? Perhaps our long term survival depends critically upon our ignorance. Another point we should consider is we already seem to have great magical powers, and the ones we have already are rife with abuse. With the power of my mind, I can use my arm and hand magic to provide aid or do harm. Why reinvent the wheel...and maybe even if possible...a much worse, more dangerous, and less accountable version...to ourselves or others. Let's do something else, something better with the magic we already have.
If God has free will, how can we trust him to be stable and to never commit a sin? We know that God, like any sentient being, tries to maximize his own utility. We also know that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. Therefore, there is no way God will not make the right choice to maximize his own utility, and this is proof that despite his free will, God will stay forever stable. If God is trying to maximize his own utility, then, a human that is doing the same, is never doing a sin either. any living being will always try to maximize his/her own utility. even when a sentient being performs altruism or empathy, he is still serving his own utility. however other subsystems\telors, unlike god, lack knowledge and wisdom or power. This is why they do not always make the right choice to maximize their own utility. this is why other telors are not stable and can't be trusted. making the wrong choice because of lack of wisdom or power, can't be a sin. and trying to maximize your own utility is not a sin either because god do it too. Therefore, there is no such thing as a sin. unless a sin is when you are not maximizing your own utility in the longer term when you have a power to either fail or succeed. like, for example, attempting to withdraw from smoking habits for better health and well being in the longer term. or try to overcome your laziness in order to do something productive and satisfying in your life. if you have no power at all, there can't be a sin, and if you have absolute power, you will never commit a sin either. So God can't commit a sin, but God is never being tested either, so it sounds unfair.
What I enjoy most about Dean is his genius level capacity to explain incredibly complex ideas to the curious layperson. He’s a delight because he is doing exactly what he was born to do - explore, explain and enthuse.
I like Dean. seems like a real humble guy. A true scientist
Thanks for great interview and thanks for and thank you for not advertising products during the interview.
Best interview of Dean ever!!!
One time I got drugged at a party and I was above myself in the corner of the room but I couldn’t understand who I was looking at or why. I was like who are these people what’s happening here ? Then later on I woke up and I realized it was me that I was looking down on. And I recall being above in the corner of the room and my view from there and everything. I think because it was trauma “I” went outside my body
I do understand his point regarding NDE, but I have had about 4 experiences to date- all different, one SDE, an apparition, etc., but fortunately for me, I was able to objectively confirm. Rushing to see my mother in law and had an apparition at the car window- looked at the clock, and the time coincided with the time of death, as we found out when we arrived. SDE, experience ended-, then the persons’ breath exhaled, one faint pulse, and died. I could go on. Always an objective sign, whether coinciding time, , or pet interest and rigid attention at the location where they were in my view, subsiding as soon as I no longer was aware of their presence. Of course there is more to the stories, but bottom line, I was not the one dying, and I was surprised or possibly skeptical enough to be sure I had objective confirmation. Controlled studies are fascinating, but they ARE controlled and clinical and these kinds of events are spontaneous and unexpected, not easily fit within a laboratory type setting, and frankly only proved to the one experiencing such a profound event. I and many, many others know, and to be honest, that is enough. I do, however, recommend another agnostic view of the subject! 😊
Great interview! I thoroughly enjoyed listening. I think you and I are in similar places in terms of curiosity. I am sharing this with my daughter who has an interest in going back to school and has an undergraduate degree in Psychology.
Awesome! Psych 4 Life!
Dean Radin said there is now to clearly tell if consciousness persist after. He should talk to Dr. Bruce Lipton . His experiment already confirmed what Dean Radin doesn't know. Lipton talks about this experiment in his book biology of belief.
Dean is always so interesting! Oddly, though, I'm shocked he is agnostic as far as after-death experiences and existence. I've had enough experiences where I've seen and remembered other lives, as well as spoken with non-material entities. Maybe he'll come around.
I have also identified as agnostic in the same vein as Radin. It’s really just a way of doggedly avoiding dogma because while we believe (and I’ve had direct experience with paranormal) it’s important to recognize the variance of experience hence “agnostic”.
what about unconscious intention
There are ndes when the person is brain-dead(at times, with no blood in the body) for several minutes during which they can see and learn things they wouldn't have possibly able to.
It’s been recently proven even if you flat line, up to an hour there is actually still brain activity. So the Nde isn’t really being dead…your brain is still active!
@@joyfulnoise349 good point!
Great insight here. Seems the mind is designed to work with limited energy. If people harness more energy their minds will influence more.
Very interesting podcast. I realize science is the know all cause it requires viable proof but faith is not something that can be measured. Or am I not correct in saying that? That said, I found this podcast to be very interesting. Thank you both for sharing. Trey great guest. 💜🌸💜🥰🦋🦋🦋
Hey Antonietta. I think Mr Radin has a very interesting perspective on spiritual phenomena, however, I place more importance on one’s experience than a collection of data taken from samples. There are so many biases out there to account for and not to mention the placebo effect. At the end of the day it should come down to your own personal experience and what lessons you can draw from them.
@@yoursuperiorself Hmm. Can you see that what you are saying might be perceived as undermining your guest? I'm sure Dean's methodology is rigorous enough to account for biases and placebo effect.
@@richardjames7479 I can see that. I wasn’t implying that. Simply stating that I place importance on the individuals experience.
@@yoursuperiorself I didn't want him to read it and be disheartened. His work is fascinating. It doesn't prove life after death but suggests something greater than self, and every day experience in the here and now. Which might include survival of consciousness. I agree that individual experience is important. It's probably the most compelling thing we have to shape our beliefs.
@@richardjames7479 I agree. Thank you Richard for you comment. I appreciate your support!
❤❤❤❤❤
#28 LIKE!🦋
12:21PM 06/22/2023.
I mean, the right question is can first person experience change second and third person experience
I can definitely show an extreme
Look up the Parapsychological Association, and The University of West Georgia
one million ads per second :p thanks for the video
I've head many NDE's from people declared clinically dead.
There is still brain activity for up to an hour even after you flatline…
If quantum number generators were truly random then how, while we can’t determine which individual photo passes through a polarized lens, can we determine what percent of photos pass? Quantum mechanics is based upon this predictability.
Why if we flip a coin, the more we do it the closer to a 50% distribution occurs? Why doesn’t that fluctuate rather than always drive toward an even split?
Can you or can I?! #mxtm
Idk I've heard Dean on other podcasts and it's a little disappointing to hear that he doesn't really believe but yet is studying it and believes in superhuman abilities and NDE's all around the world. There have been so many NDE's how can he say what he's saying. It's such a dichotomy. HOWEVER, I appreciate his perspective and his skepticism because you need that to be able to convince others once you hit gold to help quell disbelief.
Really good point you’re raising. To me stories about NDE experience are not about proving the validity but how they can inspire people and bring them hope.
@@carlosydelrosario532 Very true!
Nobody can levitate
The Catholic church has many of such people - the mystic saints who could levitate, etc. There are also those who lived so differently that when they die, they become incorruptible. Now that's even when they've been subjected to moisture and bacteria. In some cases, even the clothes that theu wore remained. You wanna talk about OBE? How about the many Catholic saints who had been seen by witnesses to be in different places at the same times? They bilocated. One of the most fascinating cases of bilocation is that of Venerable Maria Agreda who was in Europe but bilocated and CONVERTED many native Indians in America. The Indians testified of a nun in her habit and they never sent a nun of that congregation there!
Well, people hv ESP has nothingto do with whether christianity is true. Oriental tradition including qigong, yoga, taoist buddhist practice have witnessed so many practitioners performing ESP,
No they have stories that are not true…the whole incorruptible thing…come on they are waxed dipped, some are wax figurines and the decayed body is below in another box.
What if this kind of magic is real...what if its even more true than science...what if science (and it's forbears religious belief and object permanence) is the practical way to suppress that truth so we are more protected from it. Those are my real questions and concern regarding the matter. There is such a thing as too much power. Do we really want to go down that road? Are we responsible or wise enough to ever have that kind of knowledge? Perhaps our long term survival depends critically upon our ignorance. Another point we should consider is we already seem to have great magical powers, and the ones we have already are rife with abuse. With the power of my mind, I can use my arm and hand magic to provide aid or do harm. Why reinvent the wheel...and maybe even if possible...a much worse, more dangerous, and less accountable version...to ourselves or others. Let's do something else, something better with the magic we already have.
If God has free will, how can we trust him to be stable and to never commit a sin?
We know that God, like any sentient being, tries to maximize his own utility.
We also know that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent.
Therefore, there is no way God will not make the right choice to maximize his own utility, and this is proof that despite his free will, God will stay forever stable.
If God is trying to maximize his own utility, then, a human that is doing the same, is never doing a sin either.
any living being will always try to maximize his/her own utility.
even when a sentient being performs altruism or empathy, he is still serving his own utility.
however other subsystems\telors, unlike god, lack knowledge and wisdom or power.
This is why they do not always make the right choice to maximize their own utility. this is why other telors are not stable and can't be trusted.
making the wrong choice because of lack of wisdom or power, can't be a sin. and trying to maximize your own utility is not a sin either because god do it too.
Therefore, there is no such thing as a sin.
unless a sin is when you are not maximizing your own utility in the longer term when you have a power to either fail or succeed.
like, for example, attempting to withdraw from smoking habits for better health and well being in the longer term.
or try to overcome your laziness in order to do something productive and satisfying in your life.
if you have no power at all, there can't be a sin, and if you have absolute power, you will never commit a sin either.
So God can't commit a sin, but God is never being tested either, so it sounds unfair.
AC⚡️DC🌟🌈🌦💦💧🌊🫧❄️☃️❄️🌬💨🎄🪵🪺🍄🐚🌻🌹🌸🌷🌺🌼🪷🦍🦉🦅🐺🦬🐅🐆🐳🐬🦈🦭🦦🐇🦚🕊🦚🦢🦨🐿🐾🌞🌚🌝✨⭐️💥🏴☠️🔉♠️🃏🗯🔱🛡⚔️🪬🔮⚗️🧿🧿🕯💡🔌🎙🎚⌛️🪄🪅🪩💌📬🗳❌⭕️❌⭕️💯🔞🆙🆗🆒🆕🆓⚜️🅰️🅱️✝️☮️☯️❣️🖤💙🤍❤️🩹💝
🎶 you are The Highway 🛹 🤕 🎶🎵➕1️⃣♾️®️🔉♥️♠️♦️🗯I am the 🪨 📢🔱🆘💯🔞🆔♋️♐️💞♈️♎️🛐💓🖤💙