You don't need to beat all stages - the game only cares about how many times you kill Bowser in world 8 - so you can use as many warps as you want. But of course, it is still quite tedious - I personally like to switch between Mario and Luigi for each playthrough, just to vary things up a bit.
I thought it was just beat it 8 times at all. I've beaten it, between RetroPie and Wii, a total of 13 times,both versions have six or seven stars, and I've used warps every other playthrough.
Eight times... _Eight bloody times_ you have to beat this hell-written game...and for what? Four additional bonus worlds that are harder to beat?! _NO WAY!_
Worlds 9 and A are the only Worlds you cannot access through Warp Zones. To access World 9, you must clear the game from World 1-1 to World 8-4 without using Warp Zones at all. To unlock World A, you must first clear the game at least 8 times (you get a 🌟 each time you clear the game), and after that you hold the A button and press Start. In the All-Stars series, if you meet the conditions to access World 9, you clear it once, and you go straight to World A; however, that version uses save files, and if you use a Warp Zone after unlocking World 9, said World will disappear from your save file.
I was able to beat world D by using the infinitive live turtle shell kick trick in world A-1 wich took me an insane amount of tries to do so, as it was extreamly hard to perform such trick, phew🤣 then i took a warp to world B and then i warped from that world to world D. I believe i died approximately 39 times with 17 lives left,phew🤣 Man It was that real intense hard. Especially D-1, since i died an insane amount of times in that level. also level D-2 was hard as the spring could randomly despawn thus making it impossible. Note: that i used a nes rom hack of smb the lost levels to play it on an actual nes. Not only that but you can get access to world immediately by holding A and start atonce so you don’t have to beat the game 8 times in a row😆
SERIEUX QUI AURAIT LA FOIS DE LE FINIR 8 FOIS ?!!! 😮😮 (j'ai survolé, pas regardé je veux pas me spoil mais le découvrir en même temps que ma communauté). Je présente des Let's Play sur ma chaîne et notamment en ce moment « Super Mario Bros » à la fois dans sa version NES que dans sa version SNES. Faire ce jeu hardcore 7 fois en solo d'abord puis y rejouer une 8ème fois avec ma communauté pour pouvoir découvrir ensuite tous ensemble les mondes A, B, C et D ?!! JE VAIS LE FAIRE POUR EUX !!! 😁😐 (Louis-Julien, 35 ans, 13.04.2022)
I thought this game was not as bad as what people think* and, usually, the ones that hate it are the people that are not good Mario players. *I thought it was better than SMB1. When looking at a group of successors to an original, all you can reasonably expect the sequel to be is better than the original! I think it is a success based on that. Some games are relatively easy, average difficulty, and some games are relatively hard! Neither description automatically makes a game a failure...
I just started streaming it... first time ever playing. and it has been torturing me for a week lol. It's not a bad game. But it is a frustrating one. I am NOT an elite Mario player, but It's gotten me into a "1 more try" mentality. It's just super hard to beat 3 levels on 4 lives. But when I do finally get it, it's magnificent. This player has obviously put a lot of time into this game, and he's very good at it. I couldn't beat all 16 of these secret levels without a single death in 1 go. It takes me hours just to get through the harder worlds (i currently have D left).
@@wolffiegaming I used to be an experienced Mario player and I did beat it with Luigi. I can't remember trying to beat it more than once. It's a long game. Still, it is better than SMB1. All of those games were hits as far as perspective. SMB1 was argubly the best game that most had ever seen up until 85. It's between this an Duck Hunt, but the best non-shooter definitely. SMBLL was better than that. SMB2(USA) was better than that and gave you the modern 2D Mario character look. Plus, if you play most of the levels with Toadstool and Mario, then it will also be challenging, as well. SMB3 was better than that, because it was by far the funnest to date and added many powerups to the originals. SMW was the funnest to date arguably, very challenging IF you did everything on the game, and the sound/music was the best so far. They all each got better and that means that the game was a success when the one before it was also a success...
@@pattrell5257 I would argue the average Player wouldn't find this game that fun. You have to enjoy dying over and over. It's a great game though if you can forgive the fact that you're gonna die. Mario 3 was when accessibility became a priority. Smb 3 isn't easy and has a great difficulty curve. But you can get so many lives and powerups. So anyone can do it if they want
It is not just about whether someone is a skilled player or not; this game _is_ more unfair and arguably has a less elegant design than SMB1, and this frequently makes it overly frustrating. For example, there is that one part where you must become small Mario in order to be able to run across pits that are underneath a very low ceiling, and also all those backward warp zones that you can very easily run into by accident, and then also the extremely precise jumping during the wind stages. And I am not a bad player by any means; I literally beat this whole game 8 times in a row in one single night a few years ago, just so that I could unlock the secret A/B/C/D worlds (and I played several of those stages that same night), so I dare say that I am very good at this game, but I still found it quite annoying in a lot of places. SMB1 definitely has a better "flow", whereas SMB2 sometimes almost feels like a "Kaizô" fan hack or something, although SMB2 is certainly a good game as well.
![FDS Longplay [007] All Night Nippon Super Mario Bros.](/img/n.gif)
thanks, I don't want to play through the game 7 more times to see the ending
8 times!?!!! Wtf!! What are they thinking!!
You don't need to beat all stages - the game only cares about how many times you kill Bowser in world 8 - so you can use as many warps as you want.
But of course, it is still quite tedious - I personally like to switch between Mario and Luigi for each playthrough, just to vary things up a bit.
10:06
THE LEGENDARY 1-UP TRICK!
The last comment
To unlock World A-D you need to beat this game 8 times without using Warp Pipes
I thought it was just beat it 8 times at all. I've beaten it, between RetroPie and Wii, a total of 13 times,both versions have six or seven stars, and I've used warps every other playthrough.
Yeah, you can use warps. World 9 is the only world you can't get to without a 100% run
Damn. That's gonna require a lot of zero sugar energy boosts and at least a week vacation to make that happen.
Heck no I’m not doing that
Luckily, you can get to Worlds A-D in the Super Mario All-Stars version after completing the main game once after completing World 9 or using warps.
Mario the lost level cannot be that bad right
Mario the lost levels: 11:23
why does bowser turn into a stone goomba after he gets killed by fire flower mario
Because only the Bowser at the very last level is the real Bowser.
The other Bowsers have his favorite enforcers disguise themselves as Bowser.
@@thecajunphoenixoh, ok
Eight times...
_Eight bloody times_ you have to beat this hell-written game...and for what? Four additional bonus worlds that are harder to beat?! _NO WAY!_
Worlds 9 and A are the only Worlds you cannot access through Warp Zones.
To access World 9, you must clear the game from World 1-1 to World 8-4 without using Warp Zones at all.
To unlock World A, you must first clear the game at least 8 times (you get a 🌟 each time you clear the game), and after that you hold the A button and press Start.
In the All-Stars series, if you meet the conditions to access World 9, you clear it once, and you go straight to World A; however, that version uses save files, and if you use a Warp Zone after unlocking World 9, said World will disappear from your save file.
thank you so much for paving peace so I don't have to
congratulations! you were wonderful!! i'm suffering to get the trophy to kill C-4 bowser with flower.
You will help me a lot ^^
these levels look so hard lol
Whoever beats this game 8 times needs to touch some grass
I was able to beat world D by using the infinitive live turtle shell kick trick in world A-1 wich took me an insane amount of tries to do so, as it was extreamly hard to perform such trick, phew🤣
then i took a warp to world B and then i warped from that world to world D. I believe i died approximately 39 times with 17 lives left,phew🤣
Man It was that real intense hard.
Especially D-1, since i died an insane amount of times in that level. also level D-2 was hard as the spring could randomly despawn thus making it impossible.
Note: that i used a nes rom hack of smb the lost levels to play it on an actual nes.
Not only that but you can get access to world immediately by holding A and start atonce so you don’t have to beat the game 8 times in a row😆
SERIEUX QUI AURAIT LA FOIS DE LE FINIR 8 FOIS ?!!! 😮😮 (j'ai survolé, pas regardé je veux pas me spoil mais le découvrir en même temps que ma communauté).
Je présente des Let's Play sur ma chaîne et notamment en ce moment « Super Mario Bros » à la fois dans sa version NES que dans sa version SNES.
Faire ce jeu hardcore 7 fois en solo d'abord puis y rejouer une 8ème fois avec ma communauté pour pouvoir découvrir ensuite tous ensemble les mondes A, B, C et D ?!!
JE VAIS LE FAIRE POUR EUX !!! 😁😐
(Louis-Julien, 35 ans, 13.04.2022)
Le monde c est probablement mon monde préféré dans tout le jeu. c-3 et c-4 sont 2 niveaux difficiles mais c'est ce qui les rend amusants!
This was a secret based on a glitch in the original
c-3 the pain in the butt level
The one that loops. Those looping levels are a pain to play.
cool
I thought this game was not as bad as what people think* and, usually, the ones that hate it are the people that are not good Mario players.
*I thought it was better than SMB1. When looking at a group of successors to an original, all you can reasonably expect the sequel to be is better than the original! I think it is a success based on that. Some games are relatively easy, average difficulty, and some games are relatively hard! Neither description automatically makes a game a failure...
I just started streaming it... first time ever playing. and it has been torturing me for a week lol. It's not a bad game. But it is a frustrating one. I am NOT an elite Mario player, but It's gotten me into a "1 more try" mentality. It's just super hard to beat 3 levels on 4 lives. But when I do finally get it, it's magnificent. This player has obviously put a lot of time into this game, and he's very good at it. I couldn't beat all 16 of these secret levels without a single death in 1 go. It takes me hours just to get through the harder worlds (i currently have D left).
@@wolffiegaming I used to be an experienced Mario player and I did beat it with Luigi. I can't remember trying to beat it more than once. It's a long game. Still, it is better than SMB1. All of those games were hits as far as perspective. SMB1 was argubly the best game that most had ever seen up until 85. It's between this an Duck Hunt, but the best non-shooter definitely. SMBLL was better than that. SMB2(USA) was better than that and gave you the modern 2D Mario character look. Plus, if you play most of the levels with Toadstool and Mario, then it will also be challenging, as well. SMB3 was better than that, because it was by far the funnest to date and added many powerups to the originals. SMW was the funnest to date arguably, very challenging IF you did everything on the game, and the sound/music was the best so far. They all each got better and that means that the game was a success when the one before it was also a success...
@@pattrell5257 I would argue the average Player wouldn't find this game that fun. You have to enjoy dying over and over. It's a great game though if you can forgive the fact that you're gonna die. Mario 3 was when accessibility became a priority. Smb 3 isn't easy and has a great difficulty curve. But you can get so many lives and powerups. So anyone can do it if they want
It is not just about whether someone is a skilled player or not;
this game _is_ more unfair and arguably has a less elegant design than SMB1, and this frequently makes it overly frustrating.
For example, there is that one part where you must become small Mario in order to be able to run across pits that are underneath a very low ceiling, and also all those backward warp zones that you can very easily run into by accident, and then also the extremely precise jumping during the wind stages.
And I am not a bad player by any means;
I literally beat this whole game 8 times in a row in one single night a few years ago, just so that I could unlock the secret A/B/C/D worlds (and I played several of those stages that same night), so I dare say that I am very good at this game, but I still found it quite annoying in a lot of places.
SMB1 definitely has a better "flow", whereas SMB2 sometimes almost feels like a "Kaizô" fan hack or something, although SMB2 is certainly a good game as well.
@@wolffiegaming A hard game is not necessarily a rejectable moment: 1. Was MTP a hit? 2. Was UN Squadron a hit? Therw arw many more, as well...