Hitler's Stealth Fighter

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 132

  • @Pothead2005
    @Pothead2005 4 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Most exotic machine in Germany it was the most advanced in the world

    • @emilio2647
      @emilio2647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Garrett Johnson I saw a similar plan like this in Captain America the first avenger movie.

    • @SpaceTravel1776
      @SpaceTravel1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Vlad, call me, honey, k? Smooches!

    • @luigiplayer14
      @luigiplayer14 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      JOJO

    • @HerrFresh
      @HerrFresh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. It’s actually horse shit.

    • @jesusismyhelp9005
      @jesusismyhelp9005 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HerrFresh let me guess your a rotc kid

  • @stefanpaege2046
    @stefanpaege2046 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Göring's 1000/1000/1000 airplane:
    1000km/h, 1000 km range, 1000 kg of bomb weight.
    The wet dream of my country's ruling powers of their day.

    • @theidiotictroublemaker2281
      @theidiotictroublemaker2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jet bombers always carry these loads and maintain the speed or can even go higher even strike jets can take go at beyond these speeds

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theidiotictroublemaker2281 in ww2 this would have been a good 100+mph faster than most fighters

    • @theidiotictroublemaker2281
      @theidiotictroublemaker2281 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TinyBearTim yeah kinda ish but the problem with prop planes are thier pickup speed cus once a Spitfire or a Mustang looses some speed while turning it takes them a lot of time to get that speed back but jets on the other hand had no problem with this other than not able to turn fight prop planes

  • @tylerguynn5278
    @tylerguynn5278 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    There is probably more stuff like that in area 51

    • @alexandrugeorgescu6366
      @alexandrugeorgescu6366 ปีที่แล้ว

      they moved most of the stuff away decades ago because Area 51 was drawing too much public attention.

  • @grunkug
    @grunkug 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    German Engineering is good then lol

    • @kilianfirebolt
      @kilianfirebolt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      They were the first in space, and many rocket scientist of the us and soviet were ex-nazi germans transported to then

    • @Mrbimmer11
      @Mrbimmer11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kilianfirebolt Germany invented the modern world u can say.
      Gyros computers smart bomd stg44 fuel injection night wision

  • @red94mr28
    @red94mr28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    3:08 "For the last six decades the only surviving Horton 229 has been hidden in the shadows away from prying eyes." Lol, it was in Chicago sitting outside on display in plain view before being moved to the Smithsonian's restoration facility where it sat in a corner for 6 decades.

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      +@red94mr28 The Smithsonian stored it in a wooden crate without climate control (possibly outside some) from the 1950s until the 1970s when it was moved into storage at Garber. That's why the wood structure has turned to powder from fungus rot.

    • @red94mr28
      @red94mr28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FiveCentsPlease Go to the Smithsonian site and search. It was sitting in the corner of the restoration facility where people were restoring other artifacts in climate controlled buildings. What, you think the people restoring items didn't have heat in the winter or A/C in the summer??

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@red94mr28 Let me clarify this for you. This is from a research study of the aircraft and the preservation. From "Technical Study of the Bat Wing Ship (The Horten Ho 229 V3)", authors Lauren Horelick, Malcolm Collum, Peter McElhinney, Anna Weiss, Russell Lee, and Odile Madden from The American Institute for Conservation of History and Artistic Works, 2014. Note this passage: "The National Air Museum (as NASM was called then) acquired the Horten in 1952 when there was a shortage of storage facilities. Consequently, it sat outdoors in wooden crates from 1952 until 1974, and that is where most of its condition issues originate. Extensive plywood veneer delamination, material loss, biological growth, and coating delamination are evident throughout the aircraft. The metal components are corroded, fasteners have failed, and numerous small parts are missing."

  • @Catsrule1132
    @Catsrule1132 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Grumman team: "the model (unarmed with out guns or a bomb load and made up of99% wood with no tubular steel framing and no metal jet blades) had moderate stealth characteristics"
    How the writers see it: the horten 229 was an advanced stealth fighter that could break through the British home island radar chain undetected

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +@Catsrule1132 On the original, the engines were wrapped in steel panels front-to-back for fire protection. That's a big reflector.

  • @Future183
    @Future183 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    The us stealth bombers are all based on the horten

    • @HerrFresh
      @HerrFresh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No they aren’t.

    • @callumcoyne5850
      @callumcoyne5850 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes they are where do you think the scientist in America come from they come from Germany and also Britain they can’t do anything on there own just look at Americans cars etc there all shite

    • @cheezyrider1111
      @cheezyrider1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Right, we all know they’re based on the ground.

    • @dennism2336
      @dennism2336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No they're not lol

    • @Cyricaaa
      @Cyricaaa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@dennism2336 thats exactly why the B2 spirit and B21 raider are all so so close to looking like the horten where do you thing they got the idea for the coating and keeping the engines inside with inlets ... so stupid

  • @JonathonMitchell-ig4bv
    @JonathonMitchell-ig4bv 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The Germans first stealth fighter’s captured by the British forces since the end of operation market garden in 1945 the truth signed ❤🇬🇧

  • @chrislapp9468
    @chrislapp9468 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Right next to the Ark of the Covenant.

  • @EnterpriseXI
    @EnterpriseXI 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great documentary

  • @chumleywarner7245
    @chumleywarner7245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    t says here that it never flew over the USA , checkout Kenneth Arnold sighting 1947

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      + chumley warner The V3 never flew at all. It was incomplete when it was found in the Gotha factory and the wings were 75 miles away. The US gave it to the British to study over the summer of 1945 and there was some discussion of attempting flight from both the British and the Americans but it did not fly. Northrop had their own flying wing designs and it is likely that Arnold spotted a test flight.

    • @chumleywarner7245
      @chumleywarner7245 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FiveCentsPlease Well all I can say is the drawing looks nothing like a Northrop wing non of his had that classic tail.

    • @roxximusik8958
      @roxximusik8958 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FiveCentsPlease The similarity in silhouette struck me too, but I believe that Arnold claimed to have seen five or more crescent-shaped craft flying in formation. Their trajectory wasn't regular either. I very much doubt that either Northrop or the US Army Air Force of the time would have had so many trustworthy prototypes. 👽

  • @Catsrule1132
    @Catsrule1132 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Secret government warehouse" you mean the Smithsonian restoration facility in Maryland

  • @chucknorris6640
    @chucknorris6640 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    American are crying that this plane wasn’t a stealth fighter and that the ho-229 didn’t inspire the B-2, watch the hole documentary, the Northrop engineers that worked on the B-2 admitted during the documentary that the 229 was indeed the first stealth fighter and an inspiration for the B-2

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease ปีที่แล้ว +1

      + @Chuck Norris The 229 was never designed to avoid radar detection and it wasn't a fighter. The Horten brothers were prototyping a bomber using tailless aircraft theories from the 1920s and 1930s, which were low drag, fuel efficiency, and speed.

    • @chickenpurple6704
      @chickenpurple6704 ปีที่แล้ว

      The ho-229 did not have any anti-radar capabilities

    • @danielmolinar8669
      @danielmolinar8669 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you are the one coping lmao

    • @roxximusik8958
      @roxximusik8958 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rather than being designed with a low radar signature, I've always assumed that the Germans were running low on aluminium and skilled fabricators. And of course, on locations to build them. But hell - they led the world.

  • @Beelzebububble
    @Beelzebububble 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can't trust any 'truth' from this company. They're great at suing anyone who exposes them though.

  • @errornamenotfound2513
    @errornamenotfound2513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dafaq? Ho229 wasn't a stealth plane at all.

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      + Error: Name Not Found Correct, it was not.

    • @mske903
      @mske903 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it had stealth features, because it was made of wood. but also the coating, to some extent, showed stealth features. so the constructors indeed wanted to make the Ho229 a stealth jet fighter. the biggest problem for the german Luftwaffe, especially during the Battle over Britain, was not the british planes but their more advanced Radar system. so it made sense, to experiment on something new to counter this problem.

  • @TinyBearTim
    @TinyBearTim 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How would a pilot even get this thing to turn without going in to a flat spin

    • @jadgpanzerkid
      @jadgpanzerkid 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s like asking how a b2 spirit turn

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jadgpanzerkid that has loads of computers controlling it so it don’t spin 1 person with no computer would have to fly in a dogfight while controlling the yaw

    • @jadgpanzerkid
      @jadgpanzerkid 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’ve got a point. But I guess they are stable anyway because they would have thought of that too.

  • @hughjohnson2674
    @hughjohnson2674 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The engines were last suppoded between 20 and 30 hours they were lucky to get 10, same with the 266. Useless, as a realistic combat aircraft. The Mosquito also had a low Radar reflective capability. An interesting aircraft, but the Horten was totally impractical.

  • @brycewakefield6565
    @brycewakefield6565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    can it fly to hawaii non stop?

    • @Cxn1323
      @Cxn1323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      *interested japanese noises*

  • @EnergyWaver19x42
    @EnergyWaver19x42 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not stealth, it has so much wooden part so it's makes less contact with radar.

  • @andrearomanelli6259
    @andrearomanelli6259 ปีที่แล้ว

    No engines musica !no Tesla!UFO Technology!fast and furious!Augsburg Abruzzo!Steve Hawkins diverso!

  • @exeaqtorder6645
    @exeaqtorder6645 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Horton 229 vs the u2 spy plane

    • @tinydooddan1178
      @tinydooddan1178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ho229 sadly loses. it can only 1000kmph but its original designers could take it and remake it to make it better

    • @macmac0712
      @macmac0712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Tiny Dood Dan “only” 1000kmph? the u2 could only do like 450 and plus the u2 has like 0 weapons

    • @tinydooddan1178
      @tinydooddan1178 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@macmac0712 dont forget that its a prototype and nearly none were built other than just 1. and the fact that an alloy frame would break under pressure. so b2 still wins since theres more itterations and more of it. though the thing is, i beleive horten wins. but at the same time i doubt that it would. its a mix of emotions

  • @christianguenther1276
    @christianguenther1276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And the Americans are thinking: " Uhhh, what is it? Are the Krauts smart enough to build something like this? The answer to these irritatingly stupid questions is YES, WE GERMANS WERE SMART ENOUGH TO BUILD THIS. After all, we Germans put the first men on the moon.

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      + Christian Guenther Northrop started building his YB-35 in 1941, years before the Horten brothers began their 229 program.

    • @christianguenther1276
      @christianguenther1276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@FiveCentsPlease Agreed BUT the Northop was Piston- powered, whereas the Horten was jet-powered. A huge difference in performance. Check out the TH-cam video the mock-up of the Horten that was built by the Northrop-Grumann skunk works. They tested the Horten's stealth capabilities.

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@christianguenther1276 The Horten brothers started with piston and glider versions too. They should get credit for flying a wing with jet engines first and for the aerodynamic and flight control experiments. Stealth wasn't their motive, more coincidental and wishful thinking years later. Flying wing theories were speed and fuel efficiency, not avoiding radar. Northrop's work was slowed down by sub-contractor infighting and because it was a much larger design. And his work unfortunately cut short by politics and money by the first Sec. of the new Air Force.

    • @dimitrijestankovic6199
      @dimitrijestankovic6199 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FiveCentsPlease Brothers Horten worked under pressure, in worse circumstances, and still better then the others.Why don't you admit that germans are the best
      in science.

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dimitrijestankovic6199 They didn't invent the flying wing. They didn't invent stealth. Neither did the Germans or the Americans. The brothers deserve every credit for their ideas and innovation but there has been far too much mystique around what was just an experimental development program that didn't get past infancy before the war ended.

  • @enricoghirardelli2498
    @enricoghirardelli2498 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Si,ma la Gran Bretagna,non sono mai riusciti a conquistarla! Come mai?

  • @MageOtter27
    @MageOtter27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Its not a stealth figher lmao

    • @theidiotictroublemaker2281
      @theidiotictroublemaker2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Its not a full fledged stealth fighter as the f22 or su 52 but because of the shape the thing is very hard to read in a radar!

    • @MageOtter27
      @MageOtter27 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theidiotictroublemaker2281 yeah i know but i wanna say it was accidentaly "stealth"

    • @theidiotictroublemaker2281
      @theidiotictroublemaker2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MageOtter27 yeah u can say that cus it was accidental

    • @MageOtter27
      @MageOtter27 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theidiotictroublemaker2281 yep

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MageOtter27 Put "Hitler" in front of anything to make it sound sinister. Goering approved the project and it wasn't for stealth or for a fighter. May as well be Hitler's toilet brush.

  • @chickenpurple6704
    @chickenpurple6704 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me when I spread misinformation on the Internet

  • @noahwail2444
    @noahwail2444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This clip is stolen from a National Geografic doku, about building a replica and test it foe stealth abillities....

    • @derdiedasananas8236
      @derdiedasananas8236 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you have a link to the Doku because I would be interested

    • @roxximusik8958
      @roxximusik8958 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I did wonder what became of the rest of this documentary !

  • @moneyisking777
    @moneyisking777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All aircarft are be move to US under the name code of stealing nazi weapon😂

  • @pilotmiami1
    @pilotmiami1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where to see tudey???

  • @andrearomanelli6259
    @andrearomanelli6259 ปีที่แล้ว

    Abruzzo GEO Map Jet 26/72 0Tarierung

  • @willywilmouth
    @willywilmouth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    .........Beaucoup de documentaires dur le HO 229, une autre bonne vidéo, mais........le Horten était un avion furtif ???

    • @derdiedasananas8236
      @derdiedasananas8236 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was a "stealth Plane" because the shape made it harder to pickup on radar

  • @alexanderholtmann2344
    @alexanderholtmann2344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    where is the real ho 229 v3 cannons?

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      + Alexander Holtmann The V3 third prototype that survives was not an armed prototype. It was unfinished and never flown. Inside the Gotha workshop where the V3 was found in mid-April 1945 were three more prototypes under construction and I think one of those had mounts for cannons. I'm pretty sure that the remaining three prototypes were destroyed in place by Patton's forces or Allied intelligence as the fall of Germany accelerated.

  • @machoalphabarbershop2569
    @machoalphabarbershop2569 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y aun asi disen que esta tecnología no es rusia ., ahora es de Estados Unidos

  • @Aviator29
    @Aviator29 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Horten ho 229

  • @andrearomanelli6259
    @andrearomanelli6259 ปีที่แล้ว

    1kmh/sec ..3.39 million km fly! Magnetic Steve Hawking kalkulation Universe chassy UFO alone!!!resultati 3 D and not 4D collision Is not to....Titanium Zone Universe Magnetic result bivalente system!engine!

  • @JohnAnderson-po1yh
    @JohnAnderson-po1yh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    german blod tho

  • @mpdmpd8118
    @mpdmpd8118 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    so this is the b2 design is from...:D

  • @mrk5134
    @mrk5134 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Horten

  • @HerrFresh
    @HerrFresh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It’s not a stealth fighter.

    • @Richardbottlik
      @Richardbottlik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes it was a first stealth fighter

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Richardbottlik It wasn't a fighter and stealth was not part of the design. Low radar profile was inherent to flying wings. The 229 program was designing a medium bomber and it only achieved three different prototypes.

    • @Richardbottlik
      @Richardbottlik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@FiveCentsPlease Horten brothers did not wanted to build stealth plane at first but after V2 prototype they found that it have much smaller radar detection than normal plane. So if it will be used in 1945/46 it could be a first stealth plane.You can watch a video about how they made a replica (not flyworthy) and test it on radar.

    • @Richardbottlik
      @Richardbottlik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FiveCentsPlease it was a fighter bomber

    • @Richardbottlik
      @Richardbottlik 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was” not will

  • @thethirdman225
    @thethirdman225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.

  • @fiqaaljafri5887
    @fiqaaljafri5887 ปีที่แล้ว

    German engineering NO 1 . Soviet NO2. Others copy them . Lol.

  • @tuanvandersluis9100
    @tuanvandersluis9100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ho 229 is not the only fighter made in wood. the de havalen mosketo fighter/boomer is one to.