*Sees V=IR* "You cant sit with us" tbh i would have laughed my butt off if every equation went into S tier xD Also Bernoulli's principle should be S tier simply bc of plumbing ._. update: I feel personally attacked with this tier list xD
for gods sake, cogs and gears in an ideal world are more powerful than quantum computers could ever be under the born rule, they can actually do anything in a setting with no errors, quantum computers are weak and boring, you can build one out of cogs and gears easily that gives you exactly the same outcomes, or even better just gives you a curve for the expectation over all the outputs, so it is just silly, classical information theory is twofold, it is about bits and it is about continous processes, the continous process part swallows everything that could possibly exist mathematically whole, if not then you would simply have to build quantum mechanics out of something other than vectors and functions, matrices or any other hypothetical class of variable, it is just a very very silly notion to buy into quantum information theory as destinct from classical information theory, it is infact so dumb that when i found out you guys were up to that i actually became rarther depressed at the sorry state of my species. it is a mathematical fact that quantum information theory is just some class of dependent variables, there is nothing new there, because all functions are already included in classical information theory, so if you want a second kind of information theory, stay away from my mathematics it's seat is already taken.
The Euler-Lagrange equation is perhaps the most general equation that achieves this via the Lagrangian method. The Hamiltonian generalization to this would be contained in Hamilton's equations. These methods combined form the Hamilton-Lagrange equation. The Schrodinger equation also describes force at a more specific quantum level using the Hamiltonian method. Einstein's field equation also generalizes notions of force by discussing how mass, energy, force, etc. impacts and transfers through spacetime. Force plays a role in the energy-momentum tensor, and therefore contributes to the curvature of spacetime. Pretty much any equation that can be extracted from the Euler-Lagrange equation or Hamilton's principles via least action will give you a more concrete description of force and motion thereof than Newton's second law, although each of these state something similar and in all cases can be reduced to Newton's second law under a sufficient limit.
Oh I was mostly just joking. At some point in understanding, F=ma is less useful. For instance in particle physics you'll want to talk about force-carrying particles as interactions. Lagrangian Mechanics will describe forces more accurately as well. But I agree it is simple and very useful for most classical problems.
![Warhammer 40k: Space Marine 2 | เพื่อจักรพรรดิ ! [ตอนเดียวจบ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4M0ckYMA4-U/mqdefault.jpg)
If Navier-Stokes is forced to use expanded notation, then so should everything else. Rip the beauty of Maxwell's equations lol.
I'm still upset about Klein Gordon and the standard model XD
The SM deserves better!
Nice vid Heres a few u should have included
Schwinger Dyson Equations
Boltzmann Transport Equation
Bethe Salpeter Equation
So would von Neumann entropy get S tier?
I agree, should have pulled rank Eric!
Loved the video :).
Yeah this chat was definitely spicy. All entropy has a special place in my heart.
*Sees V=IR* "You cant sit with us"
tbh i would have laughed my butt off if every equation went into S tier xD
Also Bernoulli's principle should be S tier simply bc of plumbing ._.
update: I feel personally attacked with this tier list xD
Sewage system is literally the best invention of humanity. No argument there.
bruh you might not think so but boltzmann is more fundamental than gr
We never defined what the ranks meant for comparison, confused me greatly
for gods sake, cogs and gears in an ideal world are more powerful than quantum computers could ever be under the born rule, they can actually do anything in a setting with no errors, quantum computers are weak and boring, you can build one out of cogs and gears easily that gives you exactly the same outcomes, or even better just gives you a curve for the expectation over all the outputs, so it is just silly, classical information theory is twofold, it is about bits and it is about continous processes, the continous process part swallows everything that could possibly exist mathematically whole, if not then you would simply have to build quantum mechanics out of something other than vectors and functions, matrices or any other hypothetical class of variable, it is just a very very silly notion to buy into quantum information theory as destinct from classical information theory, it is infact so dumb that when i found out you guys were up to that i actually became rarther depressed at the sorry state of my species. it is a mathematical fact that quantum information theory is just some class of dependent variables, there is nothing new there, because all functions are already included in classical information theory, so if you want a second kind of information theory, stay away from my mathematics it's seat is already taken.
is there another equation that describes force better than f=ma?
The Euler-Lagrange equation is perhaps the most general equation that achieves this via the Lagrangian method. The Hamiltonian generalization to this would be contained in Hamilton's equations. These methods combined form the Hamilton-Lagrange equation. The Schrodinger equation also describes force at a more specific quantum level using the Hamiltonian method. Einstein's field equation also generalizes notions of force by discussing how mass, energy, force, etc. impacts and transfers through spacetime. Force plays a role in the energy-momentum tensor, and therefore contributes to the curvature of spacetime.
Pretty much any equation that can be extracted from the Euler-Lagrange equation or Hamilton's principles via least action will give you a more concrete description of force and motion thereof than Newton's second law, although each of these state something similar and in all cases can be reduced to Newton's second law under a sufficient limit.
@@TheLethalDomain thank you
After maxwell equations I can’t take this seriously ,do you guys even understand ?
wait why is F=ma outdated and ugly, it looks simple and works?....
Oh I was mostly just joking. At some point in understanding, F=ma is less useful. For instance in particle physics you'll want to talk about force-carrying particles as interactions. Lagrangian Mechanics will describe forces more accurately as well. But I agree it is simple and very useful for most classical problems.
@@PhysicsOH ooohhh okay
@@PhysicsOH idk man F = ma is one of the greatest success of humans
@@maxwellsequation4887 Lagrangians are a far bigger success.