The IAR-80/81; Romanian Rumbler

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2022
  • The Interwar Period saw Romania investing heavily in its military and defence infrastructure. Keen not to be reliant on foreign suppliers, this included licence building aircraft, which proved a stepping stone to the nation building their first indigenous designed fighter aircraft.
    Book suggestion: amzn.to/3P4Iibz
    Sources for this video can be found at the relevant article on:
    militarymatters.online/
    If you like this content please consider buying me a coffee or else supporting me at Patreon:
    ko-fi.com/ednashmilitarymatters
    / ednash
    Want another way to help support this channel? Maybe consider buying my book on my time fighting ISIS:
    amzn.to/3preYyO
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 443

  • @RaduB.
    @RaduB. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +214

    Hi!
    I have to praise you for digging up so much material (and most of the footage) related to IAR-80/81!
    But I would add that this fighter was actually designed for a Junkers Jumo engine. The fact that we used the radial one was because the Germans repeatedly failed to deliver it. And that was thought to be a temporary solution... Expecting the delivery of Jumos, we even tried to mount a DB601 on the IAR-80 but with little success, because of too much vibration in the structure.
    Ironically, it was determined that the plane had better performance with the radial IAR1000 series of engine than with the intended Jumos and that is why we never changed it... But with the ever increasing weight during the development, the 1025hp were becoming more and more insufficient and the performance decreased.
    There would be some other stories about this fighter but I would just want to say that we took great pride in producing it.
    Even though there were only 461 made in total.
    Thank you and greetings from Brașov, Romania! Home of the former IAR Factory...

    • @mbryson2899
      @mbryson2899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Thank you for the additional information. One of the things I enjoy about this channel is that many viewers have facts to add to what Mr. Nash has presented; it's a great team.

    • @throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992
      @throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Ok this is awesome.

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Thanks for sharing this very informative info regarding the IAR 80/81

    • @Simon_Nonymous
      @Simon_Nonymous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thank you Radu - good to hear more information!!

    • @guaporeturns9472
      @guaporeturns9472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thanks Radu

  • @kez0o9
    @kez0o9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +157

    This plane has always been aesthetically pleasing and looked advanced for the time , good video

    • @Markle2k
      @Markle2k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It almost looks like an inter-war racer.

    • @jacobmccandles1767
      @jacobmccandles1767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It lacks only gull wings to be a corsair!

    • @ildart8738
      @ildart8738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jacobmccandles1767 The cockpit is too far back resulting in bad visibility during taxiing/landing - just like Corsair.

    • @jacobmccandles1767
      @jacobmccandles1767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ildart8738 lol...yep.

    • @alecfoster5542
      @alecfoster5542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Markle2k Kurt Tank admitted that the Hughes racer was part of his inspiration for the FW190. Basically; a very clean aerodynamic form behind a radial engine. The sleek, low-drag fuselage and wings to compensate for the inherent front-end drag of a radial.

  • @lordcypher7922
    @lordcypher7922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    When I first saw this fighter years ago I thought it was a cross between an fw190 and a Corsair but it’s good to see the ‘smaller nations’ build an aircraft which actually did quite well

    • @victor62246
      @victor62246 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you think about the similarity with the Hughes H-1?

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nah, was a crappy fighter, really bad visibility, crappy weapons, meh speed. Remember in that time Germany have jets !

    • @Mircea076
      @Mircea076 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@mirandela777 Germany had jets by the end of the war,this plane was used from the start to the end of the war.

    • @charlesc.9012
      @charlesc.9012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mirandela777 It was better than the I-16, LaGG-3, MiG-3 and all the frontline bombers fielded by the ussr at the time. It is not an ego contest, you just have to be better than your enemy

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charlesc.9012 - I16 could dance circles around him, and NONE of whose you enumerated here was a "frontline bomber" lol !
      I-16, LaGG-3, Mig-3 ALL were fighters. You confuse things, dude...

  • @fergusonto201
    @fergusonto201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hopefully they can reconstruct and rebuild at least (1) one of these fantastic planes!

    • @FiveCentsPlease
      @FiveCentsPlease 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      + Ken Downing There is a project to construct one or more flying IAR-80 replicas. It looks like they might still be information gathering and planning/funding.

    • @fergusonto201
      @fergusonto201 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FiveCentsPlease Thank you for the update! Keep them coming if you have the time.

  • @falloutghoul1
    @falloutghoul1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I absolutely adore this aircraft in War Thunder.
    Those cannons absolutely shred anything.

  • @mathewkelly9968
    @mathewkelly9968 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    Probably the best aircraft designed and made by a minor power in ww2 .

    • @manoleiustin8839
      @manoleiustin8839 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Major power*

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@manoleiustin8839Romania was not a major power

    • @manoleiustin8839
      @manoleiustin8839 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TinyBearTim yes it was

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@manoleiustin8839 no it wasn’t

    • @sergioizzisavona8365
      @sergioizzisavona8365 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And, I feel, the most elegant of all.

  • @trooperdgb9722
    @trooperdgb9722 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Outstanding! had never heard of these aircraft.. but have always had some sympathy for those countries - like Romania - that really were stuck between a rock and a hard place...

  • @That70sGuitarist
    @That70sGuitarist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I would love to see a reproduction or rebuilt IAR 80 in flight. I've flown the 80 quite a bit in Combat Flight Simulator 3, and while it's quite a handful at first, it's also easily capable of outmanouvering virtually any of its enemies from the period. A great kite that deserves to be rescued from the scrapheap, absolutely!

    • @That70sGuitarist
      @That70sGuitarist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I should mention that the IAR 80 isn't available in the stock game, but only in the massive ETO add-on created by the gaming community.

  • @MSMW23
    @MSMW23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Been waiting for this one, a fascinating fighter and looks cool to boot.

    • @aaronsanborn4291
      @aaronsanborn4291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Has a similar look to the Corsair, long nose, the canopy style

  • @benlaskowski357
    @benlaskowski357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Hats off to Romania for developing such a great fighter. Hell of a plane.

    • @sandgrownun66
      @sandgrownun66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Even though it copied or bought most of its parts from foreign companies.

    • @benlaskowski357
      @benlaskowski357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@sandgrownun66 Your point?

    • @sandgrownun66
      @sandgrownun66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@benlaskowski357 My point is that the Romania had little to do with their own development of the aircraft. It was a parts bin special, cobbled together using foreign designs and parts.

    • @benlaskowski357
      @benlaskowski357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@sandgrownun66 The result was excellent. Problem is none exist today. Seeing one flying would be awesome.

    • @tudogeo7061
      @tudogeo7061 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@benlaskowski357 hi! Search for "iar 80 redivivus". Not sure wether YT allows links in comments.

  • @nateharder2286
    @nateharder2286 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    This is one of my favorite ww2 airplanes

  • @AkeN996
    @AkeN996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Personally, I think this is one of the most beautiful planes from that time-frame.

    • @nicholasbell9017
      @nicholasbell9017 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, it looks beautiful.

  • @navelriver
    @navelriver 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A very attractive airplane! The Romanians worked hard on the design and production of this aircraft resulting in a successful warplane!

  • @GreatHunters2
    @GreatHunters2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a Romanian IAR was a good plane made at Ghimbav and later newer models with modern engines ("jets") at Brasov

  • @964cuplove
    @964cuplove 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Nice looking plane, I hope they can put one together and get it flying - it deserves to be remembered

  • @stay_at_home_astronaut
    @stay_at_home_astronaut 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Good looking aircraft. It reminds me of the Hughes H-1 Racer.

    • @scootergeorge7089
      @scootergeorge7089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, it does closely resemble the H-1.

    • @calvingreene90
      @calvingreene90 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It reminds me of the FW 190.

    • @migueldelacruz4799
      @migueldelacruz4799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      an h-1 meets the ta-152

    • @throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992
      @throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cockpit and tail on the 80 remind me of the Corsair. Cowling and engine remind me of the 190, and wing placement reminds me of the f6f.
      All in all, a hodgepodge. But a great one.

    • @scootergeorge7089
      @scootergeorge7089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@calvingreene90 -= The FW190A or the D as in Dora?

  • @babaganoush6106
    @babaganoush6106 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What a good looking aeroplane. Reminds me of the hawker sea fury

  • @alankohn6709
    @alankohn6709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This is an interesting plane and it made a very good showing of its self which speak highly of the pilots, ground crews and the engineers working on. It is nice to hear of planes not built by the the big four England, US, Germany and Russia. It's also interesting to hear about an aircraft developed in the the late 30's who's story doesn't end "but with the outbreak of war all work ceased on the aircraft and...."

    • @cristibrad6742
      @cristibrad6742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Romania had artillery (and decided to focus on field guns, part anti tank part artillery excel at none) and aircraft, and conversely Hungary specialized in tanks and anti aircraft to counter in WW2

  • @exb.r.buckeyeman845
    @exb.r.buckeyeman845 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I hope the enthusiasts can create a plane from the parts.

    • @tudogeo7061
      @tudogeo7061 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Search for "iar 80 redivivus"

  • @emergingloki
    @emergingloki 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "They fought throughout, and stayed dangerous to the end".
    Fine epitaph for anything or anybody.

  • @nickdanger3802
    @nickdanger3802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Raised bubble canopy, FN Browning MG's, British reflector sites.

  • @RegulationGamingHP
    @RegulationGamingHP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I'm glad you did this. I love the IAR 81

  • @MikeDecky
    @MikeDecky 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Beautiful aircraft. One of my favourite fighters of that era.

  • @SoloRenegade
    @SoloRenegade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    that airplane actually has some good looking lines from certain angles.

  • @tigerpjm
    @tigerpjm ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well it certainly was a lovely looking bird!

  • @theprojectproject01
    @theprojectproject01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great proportions. Looks like it'd handle beautifully with no load and half fuel.

  • @zednotzee7
    @zednotzee7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Is it just me, or does this thing look like a Vought Corsair with straight wings instead of inverted gull wings ?

    • @craigevans6156
      @craigevans6156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That was my initial thought when I saw the video pop up

    • @victor62246
      @victor62246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're right! But maybe it looks even more like a Hughes H-1.

    • @charleswyler4268
      @charleswyler4268 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly!

    • @hexadecimal7300
      @hexadecimal7300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No the Corsair is a IAR 80 with gull wings :)

  • @ChristianMcAngus
    @ChristianMcAngus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I always thought this was the best looking radial engine fighter.

  • @McRocket
    @McRocket 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    'They fought throughout. And stayed dangerous to the end.'
    Sounds like my parents before they divorced.

    • @michaeldy3157
      @michaeldy3157 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That sucks. At least you had parents. I work in schools and so many kids are orphans of the evil drug culture. In other words dad is not there he is a drug using pos. Mom is sort of there but often on drugs and shit.

    • @minuteman4199
      @minuteman4199 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@michaeldy3157 Keep trying, hopefully you can help some of them.

  • @PunkinsSan
    @PunkinsSan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I'm so envy that poles never got anything as great as iar. Ending our home built fighter's history on pzl 11/24 it's sad for me

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually the Polish aircraft industry came up with a very good light bomber before war broke out. I forget what the designation was but it was called the elk I believe. It was a twin engine bomber mono playing and I think it was all monocac construction. It was faster than most of its contemporaries and carried a reasonable bomb load.

    • @PunkinsSan
      @PunkinsSan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@JohnRodriguesPhotographer pzl 37 Łoś (moose)
      I'm kinda aware that our industry was capable of doing good planes but the biggest problem was making any good engines. Every our plane was underpowered

    • @RaduB.
      @RaduB. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@PunkinsSan
      We had the same problem in Romania!...

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PunkinsSan true a lot of countries had trouble with producing high-powered engines. You look at the Italians they never really got around to making a truly high-powered engine. There last few fighters ended up using German DB 601 engines I think it was.

  • @michaeldy3157
    @michaeldy3157 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    One of the cooler looking planes of its era.

  • @sevenowls7776
    @sevenowls7776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great effort from Romania!

  • @That70sGuitarist
    @That70sGuitarist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A great video on a largely overlooked indigenous fighter from one of the lesser Axis powers. The IAR 80 was a pretty good fighter during the early war period, where they served with distinction on the Russian front, but was starting to suffer from serious shortcomings (limited engine output, steadily increasing weight, etc) by 1943, which is why the Romanian air force eventually switched to the Bf-109. Still, for what was essentially a "cobbled together" design (PZL tail, SM 79 outer wing panels) it was in every way a thoroughly modern and capable fighter when first introduced.
    A quick note, though; "Ion" (as in Ion Antonescu) is the Romanian equivalent of the English "John," and sounds more like "yawn."😉

  • @steveshoemaker6347
    @steveshoemaker6347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Amazing l did not ever know of this plane before Ed posted this video ans l am in my 80's....Thanks very much Ed.....Shoe🇺🇸

  • @donlawrence1428
    @donlawrence1428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I never heard of this aircraft! It seems like a good design, despite it's low HP engine. Thanks for the info.

  • @tonybarnes3658
    @tonybarnes3658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Looks to me a little like an FW190, especially with the gear down. Thanks again Ed, I knew hardly anything about this machine until now.

    • @grumpyadi
      @grumpyadi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yup, the American pilots actually confused them to 190s over Ploiești. Of course the IAR80 it's an earlier plane and FW190s were not involved in the defense of Romania, at least in 1942.

    • @kitbag9033
      @kitbag9033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Or a straight winged Corsair

    • @cristibrad6742
      @cristibrad6742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@grumpyadi that is because the production output of almost anything was not that great and once switching to the Bf 109 patents, remaining stock of IAR's quickly depleted. They were better than anything the reds threw out until late war.
      I can imagine 'american' reports about IAR's over Ploiesti raids being FW's similar to the reports about late Pz IV's being all Tigers

  • @hughbeein1265
    @hughbeein1265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A real beauty of an aircraft.

  • @healththenopulence5106
    @healththenopulence5106 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The first thing the Soviets did after reaching Romania was to dismantle Romania’s aircraft industry.. this says alot about the capacity of the plane.

    • @solomonarbc
      @solomonarbc ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They did that to all factories - even in the Czech Republic, which was occupied by Germany while the Soviets made a lot of waves telling how they'd protect the Czechs. Looting industrial equipment is a Russian trademark.

    • @Sofia-0001
      @Sofia-0001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      any sort of military industry.

    • @cristibrad6742
      @cristibrad6742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      they did that because 'the commie block' was supposed to buy only 'made in USSR' and historically, after the poles ever since the mid 19th century there was a special place waiting for the romanians if the russians kept pooring. And the IAR did do a number on the reds given that the Romanian Principalities were always considered colonies ever since the tzars became neighbors. Funny how with the end of the 20th century the Kharkiv factories became ewww to the russians all of a sudden :)

  • @calvingreene90
    @calvingreene90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    From just seeing the picture I would have guessed somebody got a license to produce copies of the FW 190 but their industry wasn't up to the job so they made lots of changes to get something off the assembly line.
    The designers and engineers did a phenomenal job of making a first rate fighter with a second rate tech base.

    • @laure5333
      @laure5333 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If you read the history of I.A.R. factories you'd have seen that it weren't exactly a "second rate tech base" (technologically...speaking...!) The rest - which was making the difference - were just...wrong politics...!!!

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@laure5333 - sure, they were "first hand", reason why they buy a license for a french engine ( unable to produce their own design ! ) , they took the fuselage from a polish aircraft, and weapons from the germans... but hey, the labor to mount all imported parts was all romanian !

  • @gs637
    @gs637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks a lot, really enjoyed watching this excellent documentary about the "Elegant Romanian", how the IAR-80 / 81s used to be called. It was a beautiful plane, and an excellent dog fighter with well proven track record. Good memories...

  • @hexadecimal7300
    @hexadecimal7300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Seems to be a good plane. Imagine the increase in performance it it had got the FW190 engine with 50% more power, it would have been a good adversary for any peer.

  • @AnthonyEvelyn
    @AnthonyEvelyn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Always had a healthy respect for these Romanian IAR fighters. They were formidable machines, and were a dangerous pestilence to USAAF bombers.

    • @razvanursache9493
      @razvanursache9493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They also use to like chewing p-38 lightnings as a snack 😅

    • @erickmeza-viera2668
      @erickmeza-viera2668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@razvanursache9493
      Do you have factual figures of such claim beyond anecdotal references my friend?

    • @MrQ454
      @MrQ454 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@erickmeza-viera2668 th-cam.com/video/gLI8bXDm8Yg/w-d-xo.html,

    • @madhukarjonathanminj2772
      @madhukarjonathanminj2772 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@erickmeza-viera2668 they did shoot down 23 Lightnings,but the IAR's were in larger numbers and it was a low altitude fight,a place where the lightning didn't like to be.

    • @cristibrad6742
      @cristibrad6742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that part of history is viewed as shamefully unfortunate but the IAR's did do damage to the reds. That is where they were supposed to be other than over the oilfields.

  • @radiosnail
    @radiosnail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I knew of this aircraft. Good to learn more details of it's histor. A pity there isn't one preserved.

  • @MirceaD28
    @MirceaD28 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To make sure that we, Romanians do not produce again planes, they convert the factory to a tractor factory. First it was named Savrom Tractor and later UTB (Long tractors for the USA) IAR still exist this day but just as a maintenance for various companies, while UTB the original company doesn't. In it's place is Coresi Mall with only few of the original buildings remaining such as the original hangar (at 0:37 in the left and 12:58)

    • @Sofia-0001
      @Sofia-0001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      really? IAR 99 is flying already

    • @MirceaD28
      @MirceaD28 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      IAR ceased to operate in 1948 or so when it Became the late UTB. The first tractor was named IAR 22 (can be seen today in front of the Coresi MALL Brasov) Only 1968 or so became ICA - Ghimbav an only after the revolution return to its original name but it was already separate from UTB who closed it's gates for good in 2005 or 2006@@Sofia-0001

  • @thomaslincoln401
    @thomaslincoln401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Always loved the look of these aircraft, but I didn't know much beyond them being Romanian.
    Interesting they developed a blown canopy, before it was common

  • @AaronStuartHall
    @AaronStuartHall 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The adage if it looks good ... I never knew about this plane. Great video, subscribed.

  • @gusty9053
    @gusty9053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I think they are one of the best looking fighters of WW2 though i might be biased :)). Too bad they never got engines that could show their full potential.
    Since several people commented on the looks resembling a Corsair i'll add this for context:
    It's just a case of similar problems solved in similar ways. I see similarities with the FW190 and maybe the Zero, all very different designs developed independently of each other.
    But the laws of physics are the same for everyone so if you put a big radial at the front the cowl is needed to improve aerodynamics, a wide landing gear is better than a narrow one, a bubble canopy offers better visibility than one flushed with the rear fuselage, if you have too much weight at the front the easiest way to fix that is to stretch the rear part (FW190 went through similar development stages with the different engines being fitted) etc. etc. :))

    • @woutcristael689
      @woutcristael689 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well they tried to put a DB605 in the aircraft but this made it quite unstable in flight.

    • @gusty9053
      @gusty9053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@woutcristael689 They had engine "supply" issues from the start. It was designed with one engine in mind than they had to redesign for another then another. Partly why the development was so slow.

  • @majorbloodnok6659
    @majorbloodnok6659 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for covering one of my favourites; a great looking plane.

  • @BacchusZA
    @BacchusZA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I can't be the only one who thinks this looks like the love-child of the FW-190 & F-4U, can I?

  • @MrGriguta
    @MrGriguta 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Traiasca Romania!

  • @PaulieLDP
    @PaulieLDP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A BMW 801 powered version would certainly have been something. A sleek looking aircraft.

  • @stellanholgersson7170
    @stellanholgersson7170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very advanced design, well before its time. Although under-powered and under-armed, Its essentially a Fw190 BEFORE the Fw190 came out of factory!

  • @DavidtheNorseman
    @DavidtheNorseman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for all the work you've shared on this one. I've always thought it was a handsome aircraft but never realized it was so successful.

  • @fbgiles
    @fbgiles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great show, very well done!

  • @Simon_Nonymous
    @Simon_Nonymous 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great one Ed!!

  • @mixererunio1757
    @mixererunio1757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    You should definitely make a video about PZL P.7 or P.11. Both are really interesting planes

    • @maciek_k.cichon
      @maciek_k.cichon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not to mention the P-24 which served with so many air forces.

  • @Seraphus87
    @Seraphus87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The thing which disturbs me the most about the IAR 80/81 is the lack of a tailwheel...
    Edit: other than that, despite shortcomings, I think they're quite elegant and their performance is surprisingly decent despite engines which were under-powered compared to contemporary fighters (in use that is, not in design year).

  • @rojaunjames747
    @rojaunjames747 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always exicting when ed releases a video

  • @ajvanmarle
    @ajvanmarle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. I was hoping to see this one on your channel.

  • @bodamian_bg
    @bodamian_bg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanx for yet another amazing mini documentary, Ed Nash!

  • @brentfellers9632
    @brentfellers9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Kewl, never heard of this plane in my 58 yrs of being fascinated by all aircraft! Keep up the excellent work 👏 👍 👌

  • @throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992
    @throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes! Been waiting for this one!

  • @SoloRenegade
    @SoloRenegade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It's sad I've never heard of this aircraft before. But that's what makes your videos so great.

    • @eze417
      @eze417 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It isn't well-known because Romania didn't have as much in the PR department as the larger countries did. Being on the losing side of the war didn't help either.

    • @SoloRenegade
      @SoloRenegade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eze417 well, to be fair they were on the winning side as well, just like Italy.

    • @eze417
      @eze417 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@SoloRenegade One difference is that Romania was pulled into the Soviet sphere of influence after the war and Italy wasn't. I think Churchill was behind that, but my theory takes too long to explain here. 😁

    • @killthereds2.043
      @killthereds2.043 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eze417 Yes! In October 1944, Winston Churcill sold Romania to Stalin. Funny enough, in August 1944, Churcill promised to the King of Romania that he will protect him and his country from Stalin. British loyalty, unfortunately for Romania.

    • @cristibrad6742
      @cristibrad6742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you did not heard of because once the reds took over Romania after WW2 (reinstated the banned communists, not making it an SSR complete dump) first thing was to erase as much of non-soviet and precursor history and events as possible. And internally nowadays WW2 is still considered a complete waste unlike WW1.

  • @RetroGamesCollector
    @RetroGamesCollector 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating stuff. Some great footage of the IAR-80 there, really enjoyed this.

  • @briansmith8079
    @briansmith8079 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Ed, have always wanted a documentary on thr IAR 80-81. Thank you

  • @maxdevlin4349
    @maxdevlin4349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I actually had the pleasure of meeting Princess Sophie, Prince (King) Michael's daughter a few times, she was best friends with my GF at the time. They met at the Corcoran school of art, very nice woman and accomplished photographer 🙂

  • @accadacastkr4912
    @accadacastkr4912 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thats a great looking plane
    Impressive stats too

  • @jjones6606
    @jjones6606 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, that is a pretty airplane

  • @razvananghel7492
    @razvananghel7492 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was hell of a plane. Best low altitude fighter of the entire war up to 1943. A good ground attack plane after that

  • @captaindouchebag1703
    @captaindouchebag1703 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done sir.

  • @stevetournay6103
    @stevetournay6103 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Slick little machine. Looks like a PZL 24 and the Hughes H1 racer got passionate with each other...

  • @m.streicher8286
    @m.streicher8286 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just finished your book and it was 10/10

  • @luvr381
    @luvr381 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Ed!

  • @jayg1438
    @jayg1438 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great addition!

  • @Geoduck.
    @Geoduck. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Unknown to me thanks for sharing it's great history.

  • @majormanfredrex
    @majormanfredrex 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for this look at an aircraft that deserves the attention you have given it.
    A very capable looking example of it's ilk.
    I also liked Radu's comment which gave meat to the bones.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @Yow-ske
    @Yow-ske ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, I'm about to build a "special hobby" IAR-81.
    Thanks for the video.

  • @lexthemystic3541
    @lexthemystic3541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes! The day has come! I remember when I asked you for it under the Pyorremyrsky's video! Loving the vid already!

  • @oloferixon3363
    @oloferixon3363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Mr. Nash. Once again you produce a valuable snippet, whose short content does not in any way reflect on the work being put into its production. Thank you.

  • @simonmcowan6874
    @simonmcowan6874 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That reconstruction looks to be a worthy project, I'll look forward to any news about it.

  • @killerpoint45
    @killerpoint45 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love how almost every plane photo was taken in my granny backyard from her village

  • @davidmackie8552
    @davidmackie8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting. Thankyou!

  • @gilzor9376
    @gilzor9376 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ed, you're the 'bomb' . . . . . . blasting us away with more previously unknown knowledge . . . . I am forever grateful . . . . . thank you!

  • @DONALDSON51
    @DONALDSON51 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another interesting tale of an aircraft I had no knowledge about. Cheers

  • @puppetguy8726
    @puppetguy8726 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Handsome aircraft. It's cool that Romania, Hungary and Yugoslavia all designed comparable fighters, even though only Romania and Yugoslavia ended up putting them into production.

  • @chriscarbaugh3936
    @chriscarbaugh3936 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video on a very interesting plane!

  • @cartoonfan959
    @cartoonfan959 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent video

  • @TallDude73
    @TallDude73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So this was the Romanian main fighter throughout the war. Who knew? It looked hard to see out of, though, especially when landing.

  • @tongsllc
    @tongsllc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow! Romanian IAR was more aerodynamic, had better canopy, and better landing gear than the Germans BF109. Germans should have combined the best of the Romanian IAR with FW190.

  • @george_364
    @george_364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There is a photo from 1998 of an IAR 80 where it is claimed that it is a rebuild out of 2 original planes. And there is a replica in a musuem in Romania.

    • @RaduB.
      @RaduB. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There are in fact two replicas. Both in Bucharest. One at the National Military Musem and the newer one at the National Aviation Museum. They were made in the eighties and nineties respectively, but none of them is entirely accurate. The second one comes close enough though. The most visible odd thing is its canopy.

  • @BandytaCzasu
    @BandytaCzasu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Say what you want, it was a beautiful aircraft.

  • @petrudiaconu8466
    @petrudiaconu8466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    petrica diaconu bacau romania IAR 80 motor KARP 1000 o realizare de exceptie a inginerilor si specialistilor de la IAR brasov recunostinta noastra

  • @emilkarpo
    @emilkarpo ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is a full scale replica hanging in the lobby of the movie multiplex in shopping mall in Brasov, Romania.

  • @somewhere6
    @somewhere6 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative.

  • @linzimumford4566
    @linzimumford4566 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What is that part built airframe at the start of the show with what looks like a Napier lion engine? Looks fascinating.

    • @RaduB.
      @RaduB. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      0:46 That would be an IAR 11, the indigenous fighter that 'lost' the competition to the Polish PZL P.7...

  • @chadissimusrex8038
    @chadissimusrex8038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks great. Was present in IL2 videogame.

  • @darrenwilson8042
    @darrenwilson8042 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just imagine - my Dacia Duster Diesel probably has roots that can be traced back to this period. Never occurred to me.

    • @Sofia-0001
      @Sofia-0001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/0QtOa7cP6MQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @cristibrad6742
      @cristibrad6742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if Renault sticks around maybe the first flying car we romanians all wait for will be an IAR xD (Dacia comes from the times of the romans)

  • @countdemoney9598
    @countdemoney9598 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    they had the best looking planes during the war. Beautiful things

  • @rickmoreno6858
    @rickmoreno6858 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of my favorite and best fighters in the early years of the war!