Let's Talk Movies | Uri: The Surgical Strike, The Accidental Prime Minister | Film Companion
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Our in house critics Anupama Chopra, Rahul Desai and Sucharita Tyagi discuss recent releases #UriTheSurgicalStrike and #TheAccidentalPrimeMinister.
#LetsTalkMovies #AnupamaChopra #SucharitaTyagi #RahulDesai
Have you subscribed to Film Companion yet? Join us here -
bit.ly/FCsubscribe
Visit us at filmcompanion.in
Do Like, Share, Comment & Subscribe to our channel.
Subscribe: bit.ly/FCsubscribe
Follow Us On:
/ filmcompanion
/ filmcompanion
/ filmcompanion
The Film Companion is a web channel intended to promote Indian cinema through films review, interviews, discussions, video essays and analytical compilations. It is intended primarily for the purpose of encouraging informed discussions, criticism and review of cinema and towards such purpose the programs use short extracts of cinematograph films, sounds recording and photographic works. These clips and extracts are of a minimal nature and the use is not intended to interfere in any manner with their commercial exploitation of the compete work by the owners of the copyright. The use of works are in compliance with the fair dealing exception provided under Sec. 52 of the Copyright Act, and we asset our use of the works under the exception provided for criticism and review. - บันเทิง
I disagree when they say bollywood doesn't make good propaganda films....SANJU was such a good propaganda film...
hahaha uske husband ki movie thi isliye kuch nahi bolegi madam
@@arpit7626 Bhai Anupama already bol chuki hai ki sanju movie Ke baare me ...wo already bol chuki hai unke husband ne banayi hai isliye wo bhi like kare ye jaruri nahi...par aap log pura episode dekhte nahi aap ko bus hatred felani hai ....yaar brain kyu nahi use karte ...kya ye jaruri hai Har movie me technical kamiya nahi ho sakti ....don't be stupid
@@Naruto-oj8qs ,but she didn't say why and how she didn't like it, she didn't expose it like she is doing with Uri .. such a neutral critic !!
@@amitu1943 bcoz she already said that sanju produce by Her husband and also sanju is good movie technically..... So if she rating 3 star and more than people says she is biased ..that s why she never upload sanju movie review...
@@Naruto-oj8qs ,she gave Uri thumbs down on narrative ND story ..
Why this video is seeming like a "propaganda of saving asses" as the face of all 3 of them looks like they are screwed up with all those explanations ?🤔
satarupa dasgupta Faces r screwed bcoz of Rajkumar Hirani ..
Yes i was about to say these lines, but hey anyone go after rajeev masand i think no because he is the best movie reviewer, he gave 3 stars for URI and anupama gave 2.5.
Rajeev has given 5 stars to two marathi movies which are exceptional in my point of view so anytime i go for Rajeev.
He gave 0 stars to Namste ENgland.
Balaji Mane Don't compare this mental with Rajeev Masand ..
The other two r just irritating morons ..
@@daipayanthedevil2978 Am not comparing these idiots with Rajeev but i was curious to know how come she has all the things in world to start her FC channel but still they seems very average. You should just see her office in Mumbai which is big for a small youtueb channel.
I think her husband has it all at the end
Sanju is a propaganda as much as is accidental prime minister!!!!
Sanju was a good and competent film (if someone dosen't know Sanjay Dutt at all and watches the film, he/she would still enjoy it as the film was good, it was propaganda for sure but a competent one at that) while The Accidental PM isn't good as a film (and it is also propaganda but someone who dosent know who the people are still wouldnt enjoy the film as it wasn't made well).
@C Comm I am not saying it was not a propaganda to whitewash Sanjay Dutt's life as it clearly was. It was just a good film to watch if you ignore the fact that it is based on Sanjay Dutt. Just assume it is a pure fiction not based on Sanjay Dutt's life and it is actually a good compelling story (yes it glorified a druggie who slept with 250 girls and there were many flaws in the film even if we assume it is not Sanjay Dutt but overall it was a good film with great acting and plot).
The accidental PM on the other end is a bad film with terrible acting, caricature like characters, terrible CGI and bad pacing and even if we assume it is not about Congress and Manmohan Singh, it is a terrible film with a very weak plot.
Both were propaganda, one trying to glorify a drug addict and the other trying to demean a respected PM of India but one was just better as a film compared to the other.
@C Comm I am not asking you to. I too didn't really like the film simply due to it being about Sanjay Dutt and him being glorified and agree with everything you said. I am just trying to say that as a film Sanju was better the the accidental PM. Both are equally bad if the context is taken into account about the life of the real person in question but without that context one film is better than the other.
I was simply replying to the comment that said both were propaganda films then why one gets better treatment in terms of reviews and earning and the reason was simply that one was a better film than the other without the context.
yeah and you are narendra modis ass
@C Comm To that I agree, Sanju had no need of being told (however good the film is) while a movie like APM needed to be told (however bad the film is).
I am appalled by the sheer hypocrisy of all 3 in the panel. Upon Sucharita getting trolled for Uri's review, Anupama says "It is just a film guys!" and on the other hand, Rahul says "Some film-makers don't even DESERVE to be out there. (For Accidental Prime-Minister)" Hey Rahul, "It is just a film man!"
Freedom of Expression/Your opinion is fine but you guys earn from it. You earn from the views you get on youtube or the hits from your website and that's what my problem is! You manipulate viewers. Luckily I had watched Uri with no pre-conceived notion, not for a single moment, I felt it be a propaganda film. Sucharita and Rahul went in with prejudice and have written and spoken about Uri accordingly. For example Sucharita felt the girl's crying scene during the funeral scene makes the audience guilty for being alive. C'mon, YOU felt that, not the rest of the AUDIENCE.
Both films are doing fine at the BO so fuck them.
You're an idiot lmao.
Shali Rana when you name call without having an opinion of your own, it makes you an idiot - not him 😁
Well said
Some film makers don't deserve to be out there means he was saying that they should stop making films. He wasn't saying to kill them like you thought. There is no use in making you understand I am just wasting my time.
“My husband & I are two different people”
-Anupama Chopra
“We are not going to talk about Raju Hirani” (because I can’t talk about anyone related to my husband)
-Also Anupama Chopra.
The hypocrisy in this video made me laugh out loud. Thanks for the laughs Anupama, I appreciate it.
Anupama chopra and her husband were the ones to report hirani when they received a mail with accusations against him. And let me tell you hirani is a very close associate of this couple. Still they chose to report him.
They have marked the complaint to the police and meanwhile they have also dropped hirani's name from the credit list of ek ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga.
The matter is sub judice that's why they cant make any statement because both (she and her husband) are part of the case. Its called legal restraint.
somehow curious oh really so why did they not take down hiranis name from the credits of ‘ek Ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga’ before the news came out to the media. The email was sent on November 8th why did they wait so long? Wohi baat ho gai na that jab apne ghar main aaye tab tak kuch nai bolenge. As it gets leaked to the media we’ll take his name off to show that we’ve taken action. You may fall for this hypocrisy, I won’t :)
Why is that you guys only look at the content and completely fail to understand the intent?The purpose of the video is a review of the two movies,which is logical and wise. If there is any criticism about any movie, it ultimately open rooms for improvement for film makers. And please don't watch the review videos if you guys want to take them personally and insert undue stinct of uncalled patriotism because you are disgracing the term patriotism,Because Freedom of expression is a part of the our constitutional rights.Lets respect everybody reviews and opinions and grow up wise.and why is Hirani a part of this review? Where is the connection?and only last thing, the Indian Army is not just a patriotic Armed Forces but also a Wise force and we definitely don't need you propaganda driven trollers to defend us.So BEAT IT.
@@thewolverine7478 I suggest you go read about TH-cam's policy on 'Conflict of Interest' and then utter your opinions on her reviewing a particular film.🙄
Bhai tu hindi main samazh...
Pehli comment main woh boli ki doni ki personality alag hai aur dono ke film interest alag hai
Aur dusri comment main wo bol rahi hai ki its personal and stau out of her shit
Sucharita's take on the War Cry scene is insane. I was in the theatre and most of us cried through that scene. You thought what you had to, but have some maturity before putting it out in the public domain. You said u take hours to prepare for what to say in a review, and if this is what you say, your preparation is not enough.
Not very happy after watching their URI review and the review of URI review, u guys are in public domain and ur views despite being personal can manipulate people's choice, Kal ko koi minister personal view hai bolke public domain me kuch bhi bolega toh sahi nhi hai naa.. The movie is not a documentary , the documentary has already been made by History TV. Go review that and then dispute on the facts if you have more details. The movie is inspired by True Events, there are cinematic liberties being taken and that's fine.
Unsubscribing this channel.
But i felt like jis context me that event happened when that girl cried for her father in real life, that got taken away by this movie. Rather than appropriating that scene for some other event like surgical strike, they could have save it for the real story itself. Her father didn't just die like that, he had his own story. Thora insensitive tha yeh appropriation. Respect the man who gave his life and the child who is now living a life without having her father next to her anymore. Tool ke tarah use mat karo, respect ke saath unki kahani ko batao
@@madhulikatyagi6008 If the family of the same had a problem- then they would file a case - so whats your problem? It was a fictional scene- the real officers name wasn't mentioned- nothing to do with appropriation. Look up the dictionary what "appropriation"
@@Saukingalpha i'm sorry but if the truth of surgical strike is important for a movie, then so is everything real that they take away to add. And that family is not speaking up probably because they don't want to get into turmoil. They are anyway going through hard time.
Surgical strike in itself was a matter of great pride for india. They did not have to stoop so low to use a real event which everyone knows about and use a child's real emotions just to emotionally stimulate the audience. That could have been easily avoided and still the movie would have done really well. This is insensitive because it was done with a monetary intension.
I don't associate myself with any of those reviewers. These are entirely how i feel after discussing the movie with my family and friends
@Truth Seeker guys. Whatever it is. It's still a movie. I agree with your points but there are people who have abused them very badly just for not liking some scenes. That is rediculous.
@@madhulikatyagi6008 OK, I respect your opinion - its a matter of perspective I guess.
After SANJU, another propaganda image cleaning short film is gonna arrive soon. "RAJU"
Directed by Vidhu Vinod Chopra and Written by Anupama Chopra
@7:34 I am fine with WhiteWashing. I loved "sanju" - Rahul Desai 😂
Jsquare Productions he should have better said...I am fine with white washing if it's ur husband's film Anupama ma'am,!
Paise bohout kutti cheez hain! 🤣
Ladka honest hai. At least khule aam bola toh sahi ki sanju was whitewashing
Edit: sucharita ka toh muh bhi nhi khula when anupama was talking about sanju. Idhar udhar dekhne lagi lol
Disclaimer: I am not an Indian nor do I live in India.
However, I took one of my Indian friends to watch this movie (post surgery--you gottta get out of the house thing) and I ended up really loving the movie. It was a nicely made movie. I then looked up as much info as I could over a weekend about Uri attacks and the strikes and Indian history since '47. I honestly feel that these "reviewers" are doing disservice to a nation as diverse and complicated as India by bringing in their convenient and often time political views in everything they talk about. Why do they literally believe that the audience is dumb and cannot think for themselves? Not to mention your country has such volatile neighbors that it shouldn't need more help from its own people. We too have a debatable leadership (by the way I honestly feel that your country's current leadership is an admirable one), but to brand a movie wanting to depict recent events as jingoistic, propaganda driven, loopholes filled nonsense is quite irresponsible. We took Argo and many such movies to Oscars (which by the way take many cinematic liberties to build a narrative) and you ridicule, minimize your own because of political leanings?!? You uphold other countries' cinematical efforts but hardly your own....why?? Funny people you guys are!
Your comment literally made me crying... 😭
Well said
Jhoot na bol bhai... Idhr hi k ho aap 🙄
Ma'am/Sir. Thank you for this comment. *Hugs*
Dude 🔥 🔥 Cudnt agree more!!
But - ye inki samjh me ayga (anupam sirs dialogue) 😅
I like your work and passion for movies. But you got the URI movie review completely wrong and you insulted your craft. You had a problem with URI movie even before you saw the movie. It was quite evident the way you interviewed Vickky Kaushal. Your whole objection about Hypernationalism can anger anyone. People in the Army give up their life for a nation and just imagine if somebody from their family listens to your Hypernationalism gyaan. Anyways, you have done great damage to your brand. I hope you will be careful next time.
Another moron... Who din't ever understood for what they said for an hour.
I agree with the first part of this comment. I too felt that Vicky's interview was a bit problematic. She had already formed her opinion about the film without even watching it!! She tried to get Vicky to say what she wanted to hear!
Deepak She is more sinister than you think. Her reviews for Uri and TAPM came right in the morning hours. It was as if her review was Congress-backed to stop people from watching these movies. Usually her review for a single movie comes later in the day. This time, it was unusual. Her own audience has exposed her.
@Rafeeq Mulle ki gaand jali! Congress walon ko expose hota dekh iski fat rahi h. Lol.
@@mahammadrafeeq3435 I hate BJP. I dont bring that hatred to movie theatres or to my office or to my friend circle. Lets live as Indians. Both the movies were amazing. Do watch them man.
After the success of sanju all others saw opportunity in spreading propaganda and making hell lot of money. this is just start now after 2 years we will see sallu the saviour and malya the philanthropist. Sanju should have never been approved. He was a criminal and was given sentence for that only. BRACE UP FOR THACKREY another propoganda coming, please dont review that
Sanjay dutt is much better than all the persons that you mentioned stupid
Sallu the saviour 😂😂😂
@@aravindkumar6631 jab tak hindustan me cinema h tum jaisa log chutiya bante rhnge
-ramadhir
@@aravindkumar6631 sahi bola wo kewal terrorist hi toh tha
@@aravindkumar6631 he supported terrorist activities indirectly, ab isi liye to movie bani taaki sanju ko whitewash kiya jaa sake
Um... because this channel is about films, we can't discuss Rajkumar Hirani but we can interview Shweta Bacchan? Ummmmmmm
S C ya we can't discuss rajkumar hirani but discuss Mee too movement in any interview possible
Anupama chopra and her husband were the *ones to report hirani when they received a mail with accusations against him.* And let me tell you hirani is a very close associate of this couple. Still they chose to report him.
They have marked the *complaint to the police * and meanwhile they have also *dropped hirani's name from the credit list of ek ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga.*
The matter is *sub judice* that's why she cant make any statement
@@sangitamajumder5537 there is legal restraint
@@madhulikatyagi6008 don't waste your time and energy on people like them yar. All they see is negativity and a place to utter their idiotic illogical thoughts without any knowledge whatsoever.
what a golden point dude 💯💯💯
if you can make a career in film criticism , we can atleast criticize your criticism for fun or pastime . just accept that digital world has given more voice to haters than ever before.
What you say is totally justified provided the haters offer genuine criticism of the review instead of unbridled hate for the reviewer. Just because people can make derogatory comments on the internet does not mean what they're doing is not wrong. Even so, I guess FC should prepare for such comments whenever they review a movie getting even CLOSE to politics these days, by either side of the spectrum.
Very true.
And those people don't even really mean everything they say on the internet.
Digital world has also exposed Congres-backed NDTV journos and reviewers like her. It's a system of checks and balances. You get what you deserve. Ethically compromised people get exposed.
Ms. Chopra you have a right to critique a film. I guess we have the right to criticise your review. We need to live with it.
Whether she likes it or not.
She's mrs not miss
And that’s what she has been saying if you cared to listed. Let’s learn to respectfully disagree instead of what people have been doing - making personal attacks, abusing these critics.
There's a difference between Criticizing and swearing at someone because of their review.. I hope we know the difference
@@brilliantminds8497 look who is talking. Do you even know what Ms. stands for ?
Uri is making money and so is Simbaa as well as Accidental Prime Minister. Hence proved no one listens to you guys... It's better to watch public reviews than listen to these pseudo-intellectuals
I listened to them and did not watch any. Any thoughts on that ? Lol.
Well you made a huge mistake.
Films about (intended) deshbhakti are very difficult to critique on the level of filmmaking as a whole. People are very emotionally sensitive these days for a damn movie.
Critisizing the film is connected to the nation somehow.
Even Rajeev criticized some of the weaker aspect of the film but he din't get the Hate that they did
Moreover a Professional critics Job is about telling their opinions it is to inform people whether spending their money on the movie is worth it or not. Some of the Street critics on the Social Media are doing a much better job at that than these Professionals
Its not about acceptance of criticism... Its about clear cut biasedness of Anupama Chopra
@@rahulray9983 then you follow those people.
@Truth Seeker even if they are biased, so what? Not that I agree but SO WHAT? It is their show, they are speaking their opinion. If you agree, fine, if you don't, FINE.
Boss! Ye bakchodi kahi aur jake sunao. It is not that you can't criticize movies based on some propaganda.
1. The problem is when you only call out only Uri and TAPM for it. If they are so-called propaganda movies, then she should have called out Mulk, Udta Punjab and Sanju for their respective propaganda as well.
2. You should have seen the speed with which she came out with the reviews of Uri and TAPM in the morning hours of Friday. It's as if she was doing Congress service by asking people not to watch these movies at all. This was unlike her earlier that used to come much later in the day like Rajeev Masand.
3. She is a NDTV old timer and her bias is so visibly out there now. She may be Congress-backed. Who knows?
4. Didn't her family earn crores from Sanju? Did she protest that movie being made? Now, she is taking the high-horse by calling herself unbiased. How stupid and naive does she think people are?
So these guys says,
Uri Movie did not showed Nawaj Sharif's comment when he declined the whole incidents..
But they have problems with Modi saying "Bharat hamari maa hai"
Cool.
Its shame that these so called critics are calling these movies propaganda to suit their political narrative.
Are they even Indian???
@Vermouth- black organisation
Yes it is.
These guys are sitting here and talking like they are Pakistani critics by denying the facts.
I get it you dont like the movie, nobody is forcing you to like it. But why these people are keep on telling the audience that the whole event itself on which the movie is based on, is a propaganda.
I would take this as direct insult to those soldiers and their families who suffered in the Uri attack.
And it doesn't matter what these low IQ critics says, I am going to watch this movie with my entire family on theater.
When did she say that the event was propaganda? What did you watch?
@@AparajitaBurjwal listen from 7:00
They literally say its propaganda movie..
If you are supporting these critics then god help you
Reading some of the comments here is really depressing. People lack basic reasoning and get trapped in their biases. I agree with your reviews on both the movies.
Who is biased clearly visible... Dont call d audiences biased... Everyone knows who is foolish here
one of the best director has given hs review, which means either something mentally wrong with her, OR, she has an inherent bias against 'patriotic movies',in that case she deserves all the hate - www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/uri-is-not-a-propaganda-film-says-anurag-kashyap-as-he-defends-vicky-kaushal-s-film/story-fjglZ2B5HtQq4DEI3ax9FM.html
may be you can explain those biases or else you are being close minded...
Used to be a huge fan.Chopra just tiptoes around the burning questions very conveniently.Go women empowerment!
Sucharita’s and Chopra’s hypocrisy is saddening.
FYI, You need the therapist dude! How do you expect any movie, literally any movie, to show you the EXACT plot of an operation as classified as the surgical strike? Of course there are going to be creative liberties. Also, for all your bullshit against Uri, they weren't against any country. Clearly, they stated they ARE AGAINST TERRORISM, not the country. Every country, including USA has held that position at UN. So it's ok if USA can show such background in the movies, but we can't!?
And then there was Kiran Kher who said that the movie should be sent to the Oscars. 😂😂 I need this kinda confidence to succeed in life.
Dear Sucharita
Sweety I was really not going to do this but I after watching this I feel the need to justify my first ever dislike on any of your videos. I am from an army background and what really hurts is not the government angel but other things u mention in the review I'll timestamp so u know what I mean.
0:00 inspired by true events is nothing new a lot of story tellers did it and made up stuff too so what's new to point out.
3:06 The thing about Nawaz Sharif made me laugh but then in the same breath u contradict your self.
3:20 the war cry video made me cry then to see it incorporated in the story was nice reminder a nd brings emotional connection.
3:45 Army men and women risk their lives on the border the least one can do is be greatful I really was sad at that careless comment
5:12 who saachi story hai so surgical strike isn't a saachi story???
I am not sucharita so won't speak for her but being an army child myself i would like to point out two things that bothered me.
1) that cry scene was taken from a context. Somebody's father passed away while trying to do something for the nation, while trying to protect all of us from certain kind of threat. He had his own story. But by taking it all out of the context and putting it in a movie like this seemed disrespectful to the man who died and to the daughter who cried.
*Remind people about that true event and don't just use it to decorate some other story. Don't just use it to get numbers at box office. These are true emotions. I found it to be very insensitive.*
2) and it won't take a genious to pin point that the movie was just *based on true events*. It wasn't the entire truth as in the dialogues spoken, the story of kaushal's character, the course of events. To be honest the movie makers just picked an event and formed a story around it. And there's nothing wrong with that. I mean they want the movie to work so they will dramatize it. And i can watch a documentary on URI to know the factual details. But the issue is that some idiots are taking every little thing from the movie as accurate depiction of real event. That's equally disrespectful to the people who were actually involved in the process at ground level.
That's it. I mean no disrespect towards anyone but at the same time i want people to respect our military for what it really is rather than judge it by what's shown in a movie.
Taaliyan sabhi army background ppl k liye! Hows d josh 🤩 🤩 high sir
Loved every bit of d movie n respect fr army men has increased 🔥
@@madhulikatyagi6008 tribute ko maana sikho
disrespect koi nai kiya mv me ,army ko tribute diya iye jo bht awsm tha, akal k dushman
Srishti ji I agree with most of what you're saying and the army does risk their life at the border but they're also responsible for some of the worst atrocities committed against innocent Kashmiri civilians. Our media and popular culture seem to whitewash this into an unquestioning love for the army and it is important people like Sucharita speak up against this bare bones propaganda.
@@madhulikatyagi6008 And being son of Army colonel (retd) myself, I disagree with you - the scene was very sensitively handled by director- and yes my father himself watched and said it was great tribute to the Army. The entire story was focused on the emotions of brotherhood among the forces and not as 100% accurate document- and the people of this country are not fools that they r not aware what is real and what is in context. The problem with the reviewer is that have a biased mindset and instead of judging the movie on its technicality and acting n direction- they focused on ' deshbhakti' jingoism etc. - you watch Anupuma's interview with Vicky and you can see her biased mindset. If you are truly an Army child, your blood will boil - else its little hard to believe you.
For them a movie which glorifies a man who slept with more than 250 women deserves 5star.
She never rated sanju. And she just implied in the video that she doesn't want to be associated that work even if its by her husband. You can't control your husband like a puppet. He is an individual in himself. Why blame her for that
I know all this. Don't think about enlightening me😆
🤙💯💯💯💯
@@gargvanshii then why are you telling lies? When did she give sanju 5 star rating ?
Vivek Singh that is an invalid argument!
1:58 The film ended right after the Army safely entered India after a successful operation, the last scene was that dinner one and this made the movie crisp and saved it from the political aftermath, so how could they have showed Sharif's reaction on surgical strike if they didn't include the press conference/ announcement by Indian Government or the DGMO.
@Truth Seeker I m also South Bombay Graduate... But i m also hard-core nationalist... These self proclaimed critics sucks...
@Truth Seeker exactly i fully agree wid u... They know nothing other than reading some left propagated biased media house publications n behaving like pseudo intellectuals n ignoring d People's thoughts
Yes! Thank you for saying this!
to notice that you needed half a brain cell
That is your opinion. She can say she wanted to see political aftermath, as that would have made movie better. But to say she is anti-national or didn't liked movie coz agenda is plain stupid.
As they have said, they are analysing movies on a narrative level. Why personal attacks and name calling? Such suggestions are made all the time by all critics. But this selective outrage for an army movie shows you people are brainwashed to attack anything that remotely not even exactly criticises a decision made in a flick based on army. This insecurity that everyone wants to destroy or badmouth our army is not real, but figmant of politics. All Indians love army, and appreciate their support. Attacking each other for things that don' exist is stupid. Please avoid that
'I don't bring in politics while watching a movie' - Anupama Chopra. (i paraphrased that)
Things don't exist in vacuum. It's outright lying if you say your political opinions don't influence your opinion, it matters and it should matter.
And not just politics, its the same argument when you're told to 'leave your brains at home' or any other prerequisite in terms of your thoughts and beliefs.
Just coz Hirani is her cash cow she has chosen to keep mum.Waiting for her next interview on her pet topic ‘women in film’.She won’t dare to talk about it now.If she does she has no shame.
Anupama chopra and her husband were the ones to report hirani when they received a mail with accusations against him. And let me tell you hirani is a very close associate of this couple. Still they chose to report him.
They have marked the complaint to the police and meanwhile they have also dropped hirani's name from the credit list of ek ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga.
The matter is sub judice that's why she cant make any statement
WHY NOT TALK ABOUT RAJU HIRANI???!!!!
Because this video is about let's talk movies and not let's talk metoo movement😂 understand bro first that then comment below
Hypocrisy
Reason is conflict of interest
@neethu meenakshi yes i know that but she would probably talk about him in another video but jot in this video.
@@WatermelonSugar1209 what did she say
It's a movie. Why you critics talking whether it's propaganda or not & about politics? Whether we expect from you how the movie is? Like acting, story telling, dialogue, cinematography etc. Like in URI what I can assume from your conversation that it shows Pak army as highly incompetent & as jockers, which is definitely a good point to point a finger at the makers. Was in the Movie '' HAIDAR '' Emotional Manipulation Against the Army was RiGHT? Same questions can be raised against some other terror/underworld sympathising moves as well, but you guys refrain from commenting such things for those movies.
Aftr screwing the Uri review....now the movie went hit,she is here with justifications n "mere kahne ka ye matlab nhi tha"😂😂😂😂😂
she is not justifying. she knows and everybody knows that HIT does not always mean GOOD. Happy New Year was a huge hit despite being a bad film.
total ganga cleaning!!!!
Rahul can you tell me at least one movie which is 100 percent factually correct. These are movies thus creative liberty would be taken. You went to watch a feature film not a documentary.
Anupama conveniently picks up a rare comment that agrees with her opinion. Another thing, what she thinks is the purpose of a critical review? If everyone can have their own liking or disliking for a movie then what is the difference between them and an ordinary viewer? Audience watch your reviews to get feedback but if the reviewers are biased (Anupama won't accept it ever but she definitely is) how can people trust them and then why we need them?
The Audience has shown middle finger to your biased reviews,both movies are doing just fine at the BO,so EAT IT Hypocrites.
Anuu I love watching your Review for All films.. Please see this message. Best regards from NZ..
They didn’t like the movies, you liked it. Mat dekhna review chomu
Race 3 also did well
Honest feedback -
1. Please don't review movies in the first 3 days. You people with your PERSONAL opinions, unfortunately, are affecting the decision of millions to watch or not watch a movie. All the hate that you have received and the feedback you have recently received, all three of you, especially Anupama ji and Sucharita, are not sudden bursts of anger. It was building up with your audience for quite some time and, your last review for the movie URI was for many the final nail in the coffin, considering the patriotic sentiment with the subject. If you could analyze all your own reviews, you would know how biased you people are. You don't blink an eye while ruining a movie's business with you absolute rubbish personal opinions about the movie. I would prefer to see more of honest public reviews and not your subjective opinions on a movie. I suggest, please post a review only on or after Sunday. Let the audience spread the word for a movie - good or bad. You should not influence the audience.
2. Subjective - Yes reviews are subjective. But, when you have millions of people following you, you must become objective else you should not be in this business ruining careers, disappointing your audience and deciding the fate of movies.
3. How did you disappoint - Many people are generally and personally upset with all of you, and I also mean some other critics who post nonsense feedback on twitter and other platforms which DIRECTLY impact any new released movie's opening business. When the audience who chooses to watch a movie you all raved praises for, is disappointed with the movie, they feel cheated by your review (which must have happened to many of your subscribers, many times). Also, in cases where you people discarded a movie for being a bore and nonsensical, whereas the audience enjoyed the movie experience, they see how biased and fake, and/or subjective your review is. That is the reason for all the negative feedback you have received.
4. Take feedback and work on it - Only after people sent you so much negative feedback, you guys came with this defensive video in which you people are changing your stance on the review statements you made. Read the comments again and you will know that public notices everything. Many times you must have received constructive feedback too but maybe you all missed. Be objective and justify your feedback about any movie. Don't just rate it down for whatever your reasons. Millions are listening to you, and not all will agree with your feedback, but what disappoints is the way you give your feedback. If the review is given, objectively, your audience will get a chance to choose whether they want to agree or agree to disagree with you. But you people are influencing their decisions. That influence is the concern.
Think about this.
I have unsubscribed from your channel. I don't think I would anymore like to know your personal opinions which in my personal opinion are not objective and professional, and are not in the benefit of the general audience, the movie art/craft, and the movie industry.
I am just an audience who wants to watch good movies, criticize bad ones and not waste money. But watching bad reviews or fake or personal reviews which obviously cannot be universal, are waste of time and energy.
Peace.
Of course you bring your politics Anupama......and this is called a Propoganda video.....
Vaibhav Kinge explain how she is doing that. Just because her views differ from yours, does that mean she is being political? Such binary thinking geez
@@shounak83 because it does feel like a Propoganda of saving there assssssssss off..... rightttttt..... kyunki Reviews pe bahot galiya padi n... esliye..... Now if youuuuu are not feeling like....that's not my problem Mr. Shounak Ray
Kanhaiya and Umar Khalid shouted anti India slogans to become fine young leaders. Gurmehar praised Pakistan and became next gen intellectual. A Pro army movie was called propaganda and associated actors were called spineless. Bharat Mata ki Jai was called a communal slogan. This all happened in India.
RW wale leftist ko go to Pakistan bolte the to leftists ne India ko hi Pakistan bana diya.
For people who are so liberal with negative comments, you get upset pretty quickly and easily even.
Anupama and team, I think it's absolutely fine if your personal beliefs or opinions about propaganda and aversion to it negatively impacts your viewing experience of a movie. Maybe just mention that early on to make your rationale and reason for not buying into the narrative clear. It is not possible to exist completely without bias, be it political or personal, we are a product of our collective beliefs and experiences. Having said that, i would encourage Sucharita and your team to see Rajeev Masand's review of Uri for a more unbiased sensitive review of the film. This issue relating to the Indian army is a sensitive and emotional topic for the population at large, and hence being aware of this might allow for a more meaningful discourse with the audience while providing constructive criticism with respect to the film. Rajeev does an excellent job at this. Despite having several points of critique on Uri, he never trashed the film or mocked the emotions portrayed by the characters in the army.Perhaps it is the way you are sharing your thoughts that is inciting a lot of anger, such as Sucharita coming across as mocking and quite harsh in describing the deceased army man's daughter crying. Again, introspection is not a bad thing and one always has room to improve especially for Sucharita who has only been doing this for the past four years--in comparison to a veteran critic like Anupama or Rajeev. One a side note, I would encourage Film Companion to review some world cinema, constant comparisons to Hollywood movies alone comes across as limiting. Furthermore, there appears to be a tone of frequent pandering to movies made in Hollywood, glorifying or idolizing their strengths while failing to adequately highlight their weaknesses, which should not be the case for any balanced critic. Perhaps more exposure to international films from Asia or Latin America and inclusion of them in your reviews, might add more depth and diversity to your content.
Thank you for a very sensible comment! I too felt the same way after watching Rajeev's reviews and Sucharita's in particular. The film had its problems but I loved it with its flaws. Their biases didn't allow them to look past this time
Well crafted feedback for FC to mull over. Liberalism calls for maintaining cold rationality in light of emotional upheaval. This is a difficult thing to do for most of us. FC missed the fine balance in their review of Uri. Supporting them to do better :)
imho, one should stay clear off of Not a movie review by Tyagi. You'll have your brains less messed up.
@@priyanshgupta93 exactly
For her, the girl crying scene was manipulative.. how such strong emotions can be questioned?
Anupama Varma says that they are only reviewing the movie and not insulting anyone.. When you call surgical strikes a propaganda you insult the Indian army.. period!
These guys are actually professional reviewers ?? Good Lord, even if you are against the current administration. At least, put up a better defense of Sonia, Rahul and the Congress regime. I felt like I just got out a tea party hosted by Nidhi Razdan, Sagarika Ghose and Kanhaiya Kumar after watching this ...
Sucharita,I think people are hating your review because it was baised, incorrect and full of unnecessary criticism not because you said something about Pakistani prime minister denying the strikes.Learn from your mistakes
I love anupama chopra’s interviews and reviews. She is a very sensible with her questions and also puts people at ease. She comes with clear thought process and her vocab is fab. More power to you Anupama 👍🏽😊
Hi Anupama/Sucharita....Why are you so critical about URI? Well, you can't make an Indian movie without dramatizing some of the events, else it would have fallen in Art house category & nobody would have watched it! Monetary success is also as important as critical success for any movie, else the industry wouldn't flourish. And to also address the feminist point of view that both of you always look for in a movie, URI has shown Indian woman in Armed Forces in great light as well. Yes, slight bias for Indians but we can over look some of it considering the anger in majority of us Indians against Pak terrorists.
critics frustrated by criticism.
Apt
Unsubscribed
Good for you... Thanks
*Before*
Critics: Movie is bakwas.
*After the movie does good*
Critics: We meant movie was actually good. Don't go with our previous review. HAMNE TOH PEHLE HI KAHA THA!!
2:00 Uri me woh scene bhi dalna tha...Hahah.. Koi documentary nahi bana rahe... Na koi news report hai k sab kuch jo Hua woh bataya jaye...
.The film critics want filmmakers to make movies according to their taste otherwise they will market it as a lame move. LOL . HAHA.
Arrey uske paas kuchh hoga nhi bolne ko but zabardasti kiya review. Tabhi ubhar ke nikalti hai aisi creativity
btw sucharita is using that confermation bias thing from her last podcast with cinema beyond entertainment so lame😂😂😂
Maybe but it is a very well known term in psychology being used from decades.
Wo confermation nahi, confirmation hota hai, Chintu..
@@yashwanthp7281 mere inbuilt autocorrect ka replacemant mil gya bhai log
replacemant ki v spelling next reply me shi kr diyo😂
Harsh I forgot which one but in one of her earlier review she has said the same thing about confirmation bias. Also do you think Vinit Masram (Cinema beyond....) invented this term ?? I know this term for years and so does most other people. And last but most importantly even if she is taking an idea from a conversation she had what is wrong with that ? Isn't it THE MOST NATURAL WAY we learn most things ??? I wonder why people are so eager to spread negativity all the time. May be mostly because of less knowledge and experience
These comments are just so cringeworthy. Basically anyone who has disliked these movies is biased, paid or anti-national, even though the dislike or criticism might be purely on craft, cinematography, screenplay.
This is what we have reduced the discourse to - labeling people based on their views, opinions instead of respectfully disagreeing with them, finding flaws in their argument
I know. It's ridiculous to paint someone as anti national because they didn't like a movie - not a documentary mind you, a semi fictionalised movie made by Bollywood producers to earn money.
Cringeworthy is the correct word here.
Exactly!! This comment section is cancerous.
goes to show the mentality of our fellow countrymen today. unfortunate.
Except that reviewers DID NOT DISLIKE on " purely on craft, cinematography, screenplay." - its their inherent bias against anything remotely patriotic. Even when a leftist director like Anurag Kashyap has praised this movie- you will still not get it.
seriously. I honestly think there is going to be a severe backlash to this kind of trolling. People are fed up of being policed.
Yes, sure!!! Ex-NDTV employee is going to be neutral on #Uri and #TheAccidentalPrimeMinister..
If u want to see the three worst critics in India then look at this video :)
Joke of the day: Anupama said that she doesn't discuss politics in public. So many white lies. Here is the truth:
1. She called Uri jingoistic
2. She called TAPM propaganda
3. She never called Mulk, Udta Punjab as propaganda
4. She called Sonu ke Titu kis Sweety misogynistic (everyone loved that movie)
5. Her family earns crores from Sanju, a whitewash of the alleged involvement of a person with underworld and riots that killed many. She quotes 'conflict of interest', which actually means that she doesn't want to get exposed by her audience.
6. She is an old NDTV journalist and maybe Congress-backed. This explains the back-to-back reviews of Uri & TAPM on Friday morning hours. This was unusual as her reviews usually come later in the day.
7. Her own audience has badly exposed her hypocrisy this time. But she still has audacity to call herself unbiased.
Btw I'm not from BJP IT-cell or a Modi-bhakt. Just another movie buff.
No, you're not ! I can judge what kind of films you have seen in your life if you consider TAPM to be a non-propaganda film. BJP had the audacity to tweet about it. Udta Punjab was an important film. Rest of your points, I don't have the time to argue . Also, IDGAF.
@@_sayan_roy_ udta punjab was an important film but not that important to release just before the punjab elections...
Why the accidental prime minister is not important film?? It was based on a book which is written by media advisor of ex-PM..it shows how a party can play with the future with our country for their party
Why isn't anybody noticing Groot on the table?!?! That is the cutest thing!!!
And this was anupam khers best performance...he wanted it to be nominated to the Oscars...😂😂😂
Lol 😂😂😂😂😂
And he compared himself to Daniel Day Lewis
Sucharita-Anupama-Rahul Desai --> The Accidental Critics. So apparently they have a problem with Indian patriotism and are more worried and caring why Pakistanis in the movie were shown as dumb? Hmm, lets have Raju Hirani and Vidhu Vinod Chopra make a propoganda movie like Sanju where we no care more Sanjay Dutt who is confidently saying in front of his wife that he has slept with more than 350 women, got gun from Abu Salem, Destroyed it, took drugs and god know what all more, oh wait Raju Hirani is busy with something else these days...
As I mentioned already Sucharita......It's not the content.....It's your Fun making sarcastic tone which will put u in problems....Mark my words......!!!
You are all paid...Yeah it's a movie...They work so hard,have big budgets... and for some lakhs you bash any movie...Poor you
Its so sad that criticizing a movie makes you unpatriotic in any way :( - Not that my opinion matters but I really appreciate your reviews. You guys have achieved a new level of respect for me when it comes to being unbiased. P.S. Please don't send Rahul to review movies like Simmba :) He is of different kind.
Mulla bola!
When you talk about "It's a movie" tell it few more times to yourselves.
You should look at comments the way you're asking your audience to see movies. Just like you're saying - It's just a movie! Relax! You should also think of these as JUST comments. Relax.
I honestly feel so sorry for all the hate you guys received on your reviews. You guys are brilliant, and all the points you make are valid and well put together. It makes me sad that people are not watching or reading your reviews in their entirety. The comments' section is such a mess, like you rightly said, your opinion on Uri or The Accidental has absolutely nothing to do with Sanju - a movie your sensibly refused to discuss because of conflict of interest. Why are most comments talking about Sanju when the video is about Uri and The Accidental? Elevate the level of discourse, people.
one of the best director has given hs review, which means either something mentally wrong with her, OR, she has an inherent bias against 'patriotic movies',in that case she deserves all the hate - www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/uri-is-not-a-propaganda-film-says-anurag-kashyap-as-he-defends-vicky-kaushal-s-film/story-fjglZ2B5HtQq4DEI3ax9FM.html
And this is when the director is a 1st time director - he hs done a good job
@BR SHEKHAR is Hindustan so weak that it will be heavily damaged by 3 people giving their opinions?
@BR SHEKHAR okay dude but the majority is definitely pandering to the idea of Hindustan so is it that your idea of Hindustan is so weak that it is heavily damaged by a film critic or a comic giving his opinions??
@BR SHEKHAR A) I have an atheist friend who happens to be from a Muslim family. Last time I checked he was pretty much alive and his family sent him allowances on a regular basis.
B) I am here coz I think they know more about movies than I do.
C) You said all those who say they are secular are psuedos. Psuedo-what? And how can you say that of all those who are secular? For all I know, most people aren't sure about their own feelings, how are you so sure about someone else's feelings or beliefs?
D) Is your Hindustan so weak that it will be heavily damaged by a bunch of people who know the technical aspects of different things more than you? I have asked this question again and again and you turned this question to Hindu and Muslim.
E) If you aren't accepting their message, how are you sure others are accepting it?
I have stopped seeing their reviews as they are becoming biased day by day. It's better to watch reviews of Rajeev rather. Firstly, FC over reviewed Zero and didn't review KFG or Simba. If you want to see a propaganda driven movie then one needs to see Sanju. Also would love to see their discussion on Raju Hirani allegations.😉
You may like it and i may not like it...?...it is a big deal...because you are a public figure/public youtube channel with millions of viewers...you aru not just another member of the audience....when you have viewers, you can push ahead your own agenda while reviewing the film...that's the difference....that is exactly what Ms Sucharita tried to do. who are you kidding when you say that....
So Anupama Chopra...making Sanju movie and defending a terrorist, and drug addicted person should be the motto of every film maker???? If they chose subject on deshbhakti and showing reality then it's propoganda????
Critique's job is to opine. Their following doesn't come overnight with just one review. It comes with a series of reviews which connects to the audience of their tastes. Why are these guys so defensive? They have done their job, and people will have their views as their content is online. Cheer up, guys! you can't make everyone happy and stop people from sharing their views.
Hi @filmcompanion .. Always liked your show and genuine reviews.. But being critic hw cm you didn't observe that in URI INTERN and that young Terrorist were the comparision of hw you can inspire same age person to what to become.. That's why INTERN lead the strike... Disappointed😔🤐
The words like 'people obviously didn't understand, they don't get it' shows what kind of mindset these ppl have.. they just don't consider people watching this have brains and their own opinions..
Being a woman u don't want to talk about rajkumar hirani . Shame on u anupama
Anupama chopra and her husband were the ones to report hirani when they received a mail with accusations against him. And let me tell you hirani is a very close associate of this couple. Still they chose to report him.
They have marked the complaint to the police and meanwhile they have also dropped hirani's name from the credit list of ek ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga.
The matter is sub judice that's why she cant make any statement
I might disagree with your reviews but I'm all here for you to have your opinions. I appreciate you guys standing your ground. More power to you!
Wife of propaganda movie maker talking about propaganda 🤦🏻♂️
U buy when shuri of black panther can make so many things being a very young girl.. Bcoz she is a girl... And here an intern of DRDO made something and it become bizzare for you... Plz go try to be an intern for DRDO.. VERY SMART PEOPLE BECOME THAT... IF aditya dhar made the intern a girl... Then she would never had any problem... I dont understand why this lady ghusofy feminism in evry movie... Rohit shetty gave her the best reply in the recent interview..
Get over it guys. Uri is not a propaganda movie. Get over your confirmation bias.
@@sarahhasan2572 I actually watched this whole conversation and they do claim uri was partially a propaganda film. Accidental tho was way too obvious so no questions on that.
Kitne paise mile D company se
Bhai...ye bollywood D company se chalta hai...just search how Gulshan kumar killed and share to your friends plzzz.. Hinduo ko jagana hai bhai 👍👍👍👆👆👆👆👆👆
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆
Please talk about Hirani and #Me too
My dear sir might i refer u to 0:11
m.huffingtonpost.in/amp/entry/rajkumar-hirani-accused-of-sexual-assault-by-woman-who-worked-on-sanju_in_5c349472e4b0116c11f0209f/?yy=&__twitter_impression=true
Anupama's husband was the one who got the mail regarding complaints against hirani.
They marked the complaint to the authorities for investigation
Meanwhile they have dropped hirani's name from the credits of ek ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga.
She can't speak about the issue right now coz she is part of the case and the matter is sub judice
someone in this channel 24 hours talks about feminism but she can't talk about hirani case...
Anupama you shouldn't say you don't bring your personal views while reviewing .
Biggest example of you showing personal views in review is Sonu ki tweety ki shadi .
Not generalising but lot's of girls are there in society today and if film makers choose to make films on those you shouldn't see from your agenda.
on the other hand you were fine with men being showed in idiotic way in "very di wedding"
Thank God I watched URI without watching their biased reviews.😏 You guys are so called critics and your job is to criticize others thus be ready to take some criticism as well.
"Agg lagi hai jaldi bujau" only propaganda here😂😂😂😂
3 fake people... please guys dont see their reviews before movie... U will see URI & ACCIDENTAL are totally different from their negative reviews.
And mam you do bring politics in your review, abse sabko pata chal gaya hai
On Sanju, that was a nice way to shut down that argument :)
Everyone become critics when they're jobless.....
I understand that Vidhu and Anupama are two individuals and each have their own ways and thinking, so why didn't you review Sanju irrespective of financial gains or not which was made by Vidhu and Rajkumar Hirani?. If you are true to your profession, you will judge any movie no matter who males it with same treatment for other movies. Or was it just to save embarrassment of reviewing a whitewashed movie?
I think only patriotic movie they must have liked would be Sanju. It showed their love and obsession to white wash Sanjay Dutt. We are waiting for an another patriotic movie from this sorry lot which will be called 'Raju' for Rajkumar Hirani. We don't care if you guys get paid or not, likewise, you guys shouldn't care if the movie is made with propaganda or not, just review the story and technicalities of it. Any movie which talks about social issues like Padman, Toilet Ek Prem Katha and now a patriotic movie Uri is all propaganda.
We saw how good was Broken Horses, na ghar ka na ghat ka, that was the condition, na India me dekhi na Hollywood ne dekhi. Anupama and Copmpany ne hi dekhi hogi bas.
It is sickening to see the platform being abused by these self acclaimed critics.
Trying to save their subscribers. First give biased reviews, them come together trying hard to prove their biased reviews to be correct. Hilarious indeed. This panel discussion is far interesting than the earlier biased reviews.
Somehow movie "Sanju" and word "propaganda" were never mentioned together in any Film Companion video. Yes, you didn't review the movie but its name was taken quite often. Why not?
Even "Toilet Ek Prem Katha" was called "A true story" by Anupama. And somehow "Uri" becomes propaganda? Just because then Prime Minister was shown in the movie and you have issues with that?
I like Film Companion, however the wrath unleashed upon the three of you is totally justified. This review was total hypocrisy and nothing else in my opinion.
I really respect you ma’am
But this is hypocrisy..
the reason you gave when you were asked for reviewing Sanju..
You said..
My husband is one of the producers of this film.. and if the film earns well you will be directly benefiting from that..at that time you and your husband were a single entity but now if people are asking you about Sanju being a propaganda film..
you’re taking a U-turn by saying me and my husband are two different individuals and you’re not answerable to his doing.. 😑
This comment section and whole controversy related bollywood movies in the last 1 year only affirm 1 thing, i.e, India is an intolerant country.
Whenever we seen an opinion which is opposite to our thoughts and beliefs we try to sabotage their view or simply abuse them. Thats not how a democracy works.
The same people who are saying sanju was a propaganda have gone and made that movie a 340cr+ at the domestic box office. The same who are saying Uri is a propaganda have gone ahead and made Uri a 35cr weekend.
There is no problem with propaganda as long as the movie is good. Both these movies were good thats why even the haters can't ignore them.
10:56 movies are subjective art but wen you review you expect gospel facts and social messaging in the movie!!! That's where the problem Starts
All the crew of Film companion, here is my two cents for this whole storm. And believe me , people watching your videos aren’t illiterate radicals, they all admire you and your group .This whole thing started when Anupama, you gave a political angle to Accidental Prime Minister( calling it propaganda) and hell broke loose. Whose propaganda? How can you be so sure it’s a propaganda. Your intentions might not be so, and it may be coming from honest place , but a word like propaganda is strong and can stir controversy.
That’s all I wanted to say .
Peace and love
By the way Rajeev Masand also used the word Propaganda 😂... aren’t you guys listening to what I am saying
Let me pause and comment first. Already they have mentioned its a fiction then why you ppl are repeating so often? 2. There are flaw and will be but we need this kind of movies often that stupid baseless movies like Sanju, where we don't have anything to watch literally. 3. Just watch the dedication then decide, don't come from home to tell bad about a film this is called biased in all for. 4. Whatever u do or tell movie to chalgai or chalegi.
If you say accept the unacceptance then why don't you follow the same? Why unacceptance to you bothers?
1) Even after saying it is fiction so many times, people still dont understand and start complaining as if they criticized the actual strike. The film is different from the actual strike and thus saying certain parts of the film made no sense and some were bad dosent mean they are criticising the strike but people still complained in all coments as if they criticised the strike itself.
2) I agree films like Uri are needed and it was a good film barring some things (like the overtly patriotic themes and the revenge angle. All soldiers are patriotic and brave but no one is as overtly so as shown in the film (it is a film and they need to show it to make it feel patriotic but actually showing some realism would be better) plus in actual mission no one with such a personal connection would ever be used (as it could cloud his judgement) and definitely not an intern. While Uri was overall a great film certain things shown more realistically and with less overt patriotism (best example is Zero Dark Thirty which has patriotic undertones but is nowhere as overtly patriotic as this film and way more real (in terms of feel) and Uri being tonally more like it would have made it a lot better. The thing that people enjoyed about Raazi was that it too was patriotic but that was not overt and the enemy too was shown as a competent human (which actually alliviates the film. Showing the enemy as incompentent as shown in Uri makes the daring act that soldiers performed less impactful as the enemies were stupid. If they were shown somewhat competent, the strike would feel a lot more realistic and the strike would feel a lot more accomplishing as our soldiers despite the competnt enemies pulled it off rather than as shown in the film where they pull it of against incompetent enemies which makes it less heroic in the film.)
Sanju was propaganda for sure but it was a better film to watch unlike The accidental PM.
3) Even if there is dedication, the actual result should be good (mainly the accidental PM, Uri was a good film) Look at Thugs of Hindustan for example.
4) Exactly, if a film is good wo chalegi and no one would care about these reviews (URI for example) so it dosent really matter.
@@Sayujya09 best way to put all the facts 👍👍
People are getting upset because its a propaganda movie
@@raziahmed1108 I think many are not disappointed. I watched the movie in south India and night show yesterday. It was housefull and people were appreciating. Even after here there is no smell of BJP. People enjoy the movie as a movie irrespective of any pre-notion about it. Some scenes are not true definitely they can't make everything public.
You are appreciating vicky only because he was part of sanju and was saving Grace of the movie sanju. You guys are disgusting and creating propaganda for uri bt. You guys haven't spoke about Sanju like this. Sanju was also movie like this, 3 duffers
Unsubscribed
Your husband makes propaganda films like SANJU anupama.. Where facts are distorted...
Wow I see sudden change in their reviews now after the audience made it a hit even when all of them underrated it....Moral of the story to these hypocrites: People don't take your reviews seriously...the movie is HIT!!
I am so happy to see people NOT going by these reviews and actually giving a chance to a movie like Uri. Both Anupama and Sucharita were extremely biased about this movie and I did not care to know what Rahul thought... He has some or the other problem with every Bollywood movie and I haven't understood till date if reviewing Hindi movies is his majboori or what because I do not see the passion in him for Hindi movies at all ! Yesterday I watched Uri in a packed house in Colorado and we had to wait for a day and a half to get a good seat... Not one person seemed disappointed and I did not see anybody questioning the authenticity of the story... Thankfully they watched the movie considering it a movie and gave importance to the emotion than the so called authenticity these people are whining about. All said and done, for me and a whole bunch of others in this nation, defense forces are above and beyond POLITICS. This movie did NOT promote BJP or Modi and they showed a story from an army person's POV. When people stepped out of the theater, I only heard discussions about our defense forces and not one person was going ga-ga about Modi. If you want to write a thesis on propaganda movies, pick SANJU and dissect it. For your review purposes, leave movies like these and the masala movies like Simmba because there won't come a day in the near future where you will like either of these two genres!
Totally agree about your point on rahul's POV on every bollywood movie...
I really enjoy these film discussions. I hope more and more such platforms emerge which invite and provoke discussions about movies, politics, society and more.
Okay so, I also didn't like the Drone and the drone operator bit at all. And yes the narrative is flawed. I need to add one thing. This isn't ZDT, because it's not about killing Osama Bin Laden, this film is just about revenge. It's about taking revenge, both personal and professional. Here, no person, will look.down on the body of a terrorist and think if it was worth it or not. Another thing, showing the PM of a country being involved in a film doesn't make it a propaganda film. Military films where political leader(s) are shown don't automatically make them propaganda films. And driving the love for a geographical location and the people, is obviously propaganda, but what will we do without it, attacks did happen in Uri(not fiction), need people to respect this geographical piece of land.
It was annoying to see their reviews on Uri. It was a good film, I enjoyed it, bahar bani hoti aisi koi film toh pasand aa jaati inhe. See, suchairita said chhopper se kabhi gaye hi nahi, saare mission ground se hue the, does anyone know what were the initial plans? There were plans of striking the camps my air power as well which came out later, what if air raid had been compromised and these people had to take ground route, I.e ground route became a compulsion, we don't know the exact planning even now, and also agar pakistan denying wala part daal dete wouldn't it had been "haaye pakistan ko kitna evil dikha rahe hai" the thing is ma'am , if militants (usually high level nashedi of pakistan) are infiltrating and killing an army jawan who's earning the right way then I think terrorism will be considered evil that's coming from other side of border. Also sucharita saying wo scene bhi daalna chaiye tha, usse movie aur lambi nahi ho jaati, kyuki wo bhi ek problem thi. Yaar, sorry to say this wasn't your best work even suchairita she has a good way of reviewing film but she messed it up completely by saying "wo sacchi story thi (12 strong) I totally enjoyed the film , I'll give uri 4 star and their reviews 1.
Sanju movie is the worst propaganda movie ever but the 3 clowns critics (Granny Chopra , chokri tyagi & papu desai) wont talk about that 😂😂😂
Rahul Desai: I am fine with white washing, I loved Sanju
Also Rahul Desai: URI is a propaganda
Hypocrite critic
Bande ne reason diya hai. Bola ki story me theek se fit hona chahiye and screen play achhe se develop karna chahiye toh propaganda bhi chalega. Akhir art hi toh hai
Guys, they are reviewing a film based on the craft. Why is everyone getting so touchy just because URI was a film on the army. Even a film on the army or religion etc can have flaws. No harm in pointing it out. What is there to troll someone or say harsh words.
It's because of your bias against a particular kind of movies that movie reviewers like Suraj Kumar and Pratik are getting acknowledged for their honesty
Bollywoodwallah n filmy fever too... 3 wise mens... 😂
They r sanghis and RSS people so they would give 10/5 stars to 1 star movies
@@devdeepmukherji6669 well idiot Bengalis like you is the reason why Kolkata is a shitty place and unsafe for Hindus..
Why the fuck is even called a Metro City.. Even Bangalore is so advanced..
Bastard's like you have opened your arms for Bangladeshi immigrants. Look at how advanced Gujrat is Mumbai is.. keep supporting leftist ideas and keep digging your grave
Who are they?
@@pompy5 Ur language speaks about Ur upbringing n culture. It seems u talk with Ur parents with same tone n words. Also it represents the sangh n shakhas mentality, hence not surprised. U ppl belong to the gutters n bark like street dogs. U seem to know who I m n whr I m without knowing me. U have idea about Kolkata without being there once. And u have a name which is unknown. U also seem to know who I support. Well Mr. Sanghi extremist, u r wrong in most of Ur allegations. Now keep on barking as that's Ur staple lifestyle. After all stray dogs r ultimately picked n trashed n one day u ll meet the same fate. Moreover, ask Ur parents to impart some education n mannerism. May b they too lack it.
Only one question was udta punjab a propaganda movie and people were fighting to get it release and it turned out to be critics fav but uri which was loved by the common people becomes a propaganda movie
Please call it a bad movie(uri) but don't call it a movie with propaganda
By d way uri was a great movie and 1 star to movie seriously