Where is the proof for God's existence? - Dr. Vyasanakere Prabhanjanacharya
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
- Acharyaru touches upon the following topics:-
Theory of Causality in Physics
Absolute vs relative independence
Srimadacharyaru's words: bahu chitra jagat bahudAkaraNat
Law of conservation of energy & spiritual energy
Acharya-re, you have explained this complex question in such a simple and an elegant way 🙏
Really nice... Conduct polls for the questions to be asked to Acharyaru, you will get more number of questions and better questions to ask
Good idea. Will check it out for the next video.
H ohk hi IGI gf IGI hi oh ugh ohk ugh Kgf gun huh ugh g Kunj h ugh ugh IGI ugh IGI Hb jk ugh oh uh jk hi IGI h jk hi IGI g jk ugh jk ugh Khufu high Hb j h jk hv km gf jk hi ugh IGI gf jk ugh jk gf h
Acharyare, thanks so much for doing this. The current generation needs guiding lights like you.
One follow up question that comes up, and is in a lot of debates in the secular/science crowds is if you take back the theory of causation further and further back to the one creator, then what caused the creator? Why does the same law of causality that brought us to that point stop there? Wouldn’t that lead to an infinite regress again? I’m sure there is an answer in our shastras, but we just do not know it. Kindly enlighten..
🙏🏽
Good point. I'll take this up with Acharyaru in our next meet. I think we can make a short follow up video for this question. Thanks for raising this point.
Hare Krishna 🙏🏻🙏🏻
What a beautiful conclusion science only discribes how not why.
It would be greatly helpful if the Acharya can deliver a detailed talk on Sandhyavandana, from start to finish, explaining every mantra and gesture performed. Most of us practice by rote, without knowing the significance of what we do.🙏🏽
Thanks for the suggestion. For most of us, Sandhyavandane has become a chore that's done very mechanically. I'll have a discussion with acharya to see if we can have mantra by mantra explanations.
When I finished listening the first thought that came to me was about Sandyavandana and its procedures. Also, what do we follow Rigveda or Yajurveda...also please explain the mudras and the rest. Thank you very much. My Shastang Namaskar to Achararu. 🙏💐🙏
🙏🙏🙏
Crazy explanation !!! agree on cause and effect. Bigbang theory does not explain the organized way, the world is running in. Defenetely, there is a huge spiritual energy behind the origin of this materialistic universe as explained here. Very interesting explanation.
Big bang just try to explain the state of this universe from a perception of concentration. .....
Excellent guruge
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🙏🙏🙏🙏🌹🌹🙏
ಶ್ರೀ ಗುರುಭ್ಯೋ ನಮಃ
#VenkateshaS
I am from andhara Subtitles please
Sorry... we could not find anyone to take up the task.
Q1) Jaati mattu varna eradu berena athava ondena?
Q2) Moksha yogya jeevaru yava jaatiyalladaroo irabahuda?
Moksha padeyuvudakke jathi bheda illa. Sajjanaru Elle iddaru mokshavannu padeyuva arhateyannu hondiruttare. Adakke drushtantave mahanharata, pandavaru kshatriyaru.
1:44 what is the source of that Shloka?
Acharya Madhwas Dwadasha Stotra 3rd adhyaya
@@sudhanvakulkarni42Thank you.
Cause and effect is mind's conception and reasoning. That cannot be basis for existence of god.
Oh.... Cause and effect is just mind's conception and reasoning?
Is it just that? 😁😁😁😁😁oh no!
That means you are writing a note..... There us no cause and effect... Just mind's conception brother? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣oh no!
That means you are writing a note is completely unreal and nobody is actually here? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
How funny!
Listen brother... We are real... This world is real abd yes we are doing something.. Also that is also real...that means cause and effect is also real....
Is it not just case of man mind's conception... Rather it is mind's understandings of it..... Not anymore a delusion...
And if you have any problem that people are using reasoning to understand this fact.. Then I feel sorry for you.. What a bogus crying.... Human mind is for understanding... It is true.....
Everything which began to exist had a cause... This universe began to exist... So it has its cause... And likewise all have a primordial supreme cause... Lord Hari is the cause for all..... That's why he is sarva karana karanam...
@@immadiPatheshwara existence of God is due to delusional consciousness of mind? Is it brother?
I feel sorry for you... 😁😁😁😁
@@subhrodiprakshit8923 What is definition of "real"? Can you illuminate with your wisdom please?
Who created the god then ? If god always exists without cause , then why not just say matter always exists without any creator ? This guy is just saying consciousness is god, and changing the definition of god, making straw man argument.
By definition, God (paramatma) & us (atmas) were never created. We have always existed and will continue so. It's like time or space or matter (energy) having a creator - they don't have one and they have always existed. Matter too can never be created or destroyed. The person answering is not a random 'guy'. The acharya is merely being the messenger in conveying what is said in the scriptures. Of course, we are all entitled to form our opinions otherwise.
@@VedicDiscourses it is like saying bible is true because bible says it is true, circular reasoning without any proof or reasonable evidence.
@@purumr Edit: Not exactly. Truth can be experienced and truth is something that sustains. So, no amount of brain washing by books or otherwise can ever sustain. And experience need not always come under the purview of material proofs. For example, there were people who deduced that bodies rot because of minute organisms, before the invention of the microscope. It's not that micro-organisms didn't exist before microscopes, for example. So, we need not be so quick in dismissing texts, unless our experience proves otherwise.
@@VedicDiscourses first person subjective experiences can prove the subjective experience unless we are talking about cases like mental disorder. I am not denying it. But first person subjective experience can't be the basis for making objective claims about cosmology, God, etc
@@purumr The point of experience came into picture as a means to verify the truth stated in the texts. There's an entire discussion on what constitutes as proof when it comes to philosophy as the subject matter isn't as simple as arriving at it through sight, smell, touch or taste. Basically, it comes down to anumana (logic), agama (texts) & pratyaksha (verifiable through our common senses) - these have to sit right with sakshi (or experience, to term it crudely). For example, if I say that the Sun will rise at 6:15 tomorrow, you can verify it with agama (google forecasted time), use anumana to check if google forecasts have been true before with the probability of it being true tomorrow and finally, with pratyaksha, you can verify the statement at the time of 6:15 tomorrow, which will sit right with sakshi or experience. To put the 4 definitions crudely.
Taking the same concepts, the scriptures are ascertained. Faith need not be set aside as a bad thing. For example, even though most of us have not done a paternity or a maternity test (again, with faith in the Science behind it, faith in the particular people involved & faith in the machines involved), we are unquestionably certain that we are in truth about who our parents are. As said, we need not wait for the invention of a microscope to arrive at micro-organisms' existence. Those means of truths and the ways to verify & experience them is part of the journey in realizing the ultimate.
God is something that can be experienced (let's take anumana or logic). The proof that some sort of governance exists in an area is verifiable by the roads, the commute buses/trains or the water & electricity supply in that area. Similarly, this orderly chaos that exists in the world is undeniably under governance. No wonder we can predict the sunrise a year from now. Now, one can attribute that intelligence to matter. But, matter in itself isn't an actor. It's like saying that artificial intelligence came about on its own, without any form of human interference. Intelligence is an attribute of life. There's intelligence in the elements of the periodic table. One element doesn't behave like the other. One can say that it comes about naturally - but the way it's designed to come about naturally requires intelligence. Like a motion sensing bulb (matter) designed to naturally come on when it detects motion - Matter in itself isn't an actor and intelligence is an attribute of life.
For a bit of perspective, let's look at it from another angle. We all know that there's hierarchy of intelligence among species. For a dog, the automatic change in traffic signal lights would seem like a natural event and it's highly improbable for the most intelligent dog on the planet to arrive at the concept of a government being voted in to maintain a system like that. Considering organic life as we know it, the number of earth-like planets in our galaxy is estimated to be around 30 billion and such galaxies (deduced from what's been observable alone) are estimated to be about 200 billion. It would probably be naive to assume that human beings are the most intelligent species or the only existing ones, & the concept of denying/accepting truths based purely on pratyaksha &/or anumana (discounting sakshi & agama).
I'm afraid there's a lot more to be discussed and I know TH-cam comments can't really do justice to such a discussion. I have briefed as best as I could.
ಭಗವಂತನ ಜೀವನಲ್ಲಿ ಬಿಂಬನಾಗಿ ಸಾದ ಇದ್ದಾನೆ ಅಲ್ವಾ ಅನಾದಿ ಕಾಲದಿಂದ ಅಲ್ವಾ ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ಒಂದು ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಏನೆಂದರೆ.....
..
ಭಗವಂತನು ನವ ನಾರಿ ಕುಂಜರನ ಹಾಗೆ ಇದ್ದಾನೆ ಅಲ್ವಾ ಅವನಿಗೆ ಸ್ವಾಕ್ಯ ರಸನೆ ಸ್ವಿಕಾರ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಾನೆ so ಬಿಂಬ ರೂಪ ಮೂಲ ರೂಪದಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರಿದರೆ ಜೀವಿಗಳು ಅಸತ್ಯ ವಾಗುತ್ತವೆ ಆದರೆ ಬಿಂಬ ರೂಪ ಹೇಗೆ ಬಂತು ಮೊದಲು ? I mean ಬಿಂಬ ರೂಪ ಮೂಲ ರೂಪದಿಂದ ಹೇಗೆ ವಿಭಂಜನೆ ಆಯಿತು
ಇದು ಆಳವಾಗಿ ವಿಚಾರ ಮಾಡಬೇಕಾದಂತಹ ವಿಷಯ. ಬಿಂಬ ಪ್ರತಿಬಿಂಬ ಭಾವದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಚರ್ಚೆಯ ಶೈಲಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ವೀಡಿಯೋ ಮಾಡಬೇಕೆಂದು ಅಂದುಕೊಂಡಿದ್ದೇನೆ - ಶ್ರೀ ಕಾಂತೇಶಾಚಾರ್ಯ ಕದರಮಂಡಲಗಿ ಅವರೊಡನೆ.
Bimba roopa endare bhagavanta anoraniyanagi jeeva swaroopadalli(pratibimba) iddu jeevanannu,indriyagalannu niyantrisuttiddane. Jeevigalu anadi nityavadavu bhagavantana hage.