Summary of Major James Webb Galactic Discoveries That Nobody Expected
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- Get a Wonderful Person shirt: teespring.com/...
Classic Mars design is on Amazon: amzn.to/3BWwIMz
Alternatively, PayPal donations can be sent here: paypal.me/whatd...
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about some of the major discoveries from the James Webb that were made in July-August of 2022
Links:
www.nature.com...
/ 1551761864492781574
/ 1551864183230177280
/ 1551732081285292032
arxiv.org/abs/...
arxiv.org/abs/...
#jwst #jameswebb #galaxies
Support this channel on Patreon to help me make this a full time job:
/ whatdamath
Bitcoin/Ethereum to spare? Donate them here to help this channel grow!
bc1qnkl3nk0zt7w0xzrgur9pnkcduj7a3xxllcn7d4
or ETH: 0x60f088B10b03115405d313f964BeA93eF0Bd3DbF
Space Engine is available for free here: spaceengine.org
Enjoy and please subscribe.
Twitter: / whatdamath
Facebook: / whatdamath
Twitch: / whatdamath
The hardware used to record these videos:
New Camera: amzn.to/34DUUlv
CPU: amzn.to/2LZFQCJ
Video Card: amzn.to/2M1W26C
Motherboard: amzn.to/2JYGiQQ
RAM: amzn.to/2Mwy2t4
PSU: amzn.to/2LZcrIH
Case: amzn.to/2MwJZz4
Microphone: amzn.to/2t5jTv0
Mixer: amzn.to/2JOL0oF
Recording and Editing: amzn.to/2LX6uvU
Some of the above are affiliate links, meaning I would get a (very small) percentage of the price paid.
Thank you to all Patreon supporters of this channel
Special thanks also goes to all the wonderful supporters of the channel through TH-cam Memberships
Images/Videos:
Aleš Tošovský CC BY-SA 3.0 en.wikipedia.o...
NASA/ESA/CSA
NASA, ESA, R. Ellis (Caltech), and the HUDF 2012 Team CC BY 3.0 en.wikipedia.o...
Las Cumbres Observatory lco.global/spa...
JWST GLASS Survey NASA/CSA/ESA/STScI; Pascal Oesch/University of Geneva
The Illustris Project, TNG Collaboration
NRAO public.nrao.ed...
Licenses used:
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
I was expecting amazing stuff from the James Webb telescope but I never expected it to be so much so fast. This will be a big game changer. Imagine if one day we built a massive multiple kilometers wide telescope at the edge of our solar system, the things we would be able to see.
Wouldn’t the information from the telescope just take way too long too make that a viable option?
@@GH29111 not at all, they would just need a high enough bandwidth connection! Probably some sort of laser transmitter would be more than enough. Just my opinion!
@@GH29111 Probably, by the time such a construction would be feasible, the question of high-bandwidth data transfer would be more or less solved (by having a pair of parabolic antennas a couple of hundred meters in diameter, one at the telescope, one near the Earth, or something like that).
@@GH29111 It's visual observation by cameras, does it mater if it takes many hours to receive? We still communicate with voyager past that distance.
@@GH29111 no?
Bless you Anton! You've created a place where I can learn about the JWST discoveries that aren't "Terrifying clickbait!"
Do you mean to say that scientists are not all terrified by the shocking discoveries made by the JWST which will literally blow our minds?
The saddest thing is that most of the JWST content delivered by the algorithm is clickbait. We need to refrain at all costs from viewing these and support channels like Anton's and SEA.
I'm the sun bloats and burns up the earth ,eta 5 billion years , on a Tuesday I predict..,it's concerning if not eggactly terrifying...it's chilling and horrible but not my monkey , not my circus ...
SirImperialMike
I know right, TH-cam is full of James Webb fake videos and clickbaity videos that just waste my time...
I started to know the chanels that produce clickbaby videos and I refrain from watching them.
Truth!!
If you are here, this part of the net then you are in the right spot. so much drama, Anton always helps my anxiety, mf been and goin through so much and still holds strong for science. Truly thank you for the time meng.
what u mean hes been goingthrough so much?
@@nonye0 his infant passed away.
@@keenfire8151 omg when did that happen? How did you find out about that?
@@orchdork775 : I found out by reading the _Let's Help The Kids In Ukraine_ fundraiser section to the right of the video.
@@keenfire8151
How did it happen?
I saw a comic strip one time (The Far Side, I think) that showed one person using a telescope and another using a microscope. Over time, each instrument became more and more powerful. Eventually, this resulted in the two of them looking each other directly in the eye.
Infinity is like that.
They they - he/she/they - discovered that they were actually looking at a reflection of them self. Maybe the very edge of our universe is reflective and we're seeing reflections of younger galaxies much closer. Think of it as the cosmic equivalent of an echo, only it's with light.
Space is expanding. LoL
@@caribbeanman3379 Or 4D space-time has a geometry which loops back on itself like the classic Asteroids video game.
If you get a chance, try the eye gazing meditation. 2 people just look into each other’s eyes sitting close togather.
I love how NASA makes everything available without barriers. Then the scientific community is coming together to make sense of the images and data
because they keep your head and eyes in that direction preventing you from looking and discovering what really happens around you today and but what happened 20 billion years ago .. ;-) Cheers
23 billion per year they better
@@Dabooshky Haha! If only. There's so much terrible news out there that it's nice to get some good things every now and then
@@Dabooshky I feel like it's the opposite actually. I see so many negative news on TV and social media, that we usually forget about the good things happening around the world right now, in this case the great scientific achievements.
Lol what? U think they’ve told us everything they know? There’s so much going on just in earth’s orbit they’re quiet about.
I'm not a Scientist, but I'm beginning to get an urge to know more and more about our universe. Thank you very much 😊
We are all scientists if we are at the very least curious! Never forget it!
@@universalsoulhealing Unfortunately that is not how it works. To be a scientist means to follow the scientific method. Most people around the world follow some type of faith. Faith is the excuse people give when they don't have good evidence. So those people are not scientists they are religious nutjobs.
@@Skepticfornow I bet you’re fun at parties!
@@Skepticfornow Not being religious means you are not deluded, but it doesn't make you a scientist.
Science gained so much “credibility” over last 2 years lol, some A hole always has to bring up religion on these presentations
I love how at only a few months into it's mission, JWST is throwing space sciences for a loop... I'm anxious to see what it discovers....
What if we discover a giant pubic hair? only to find out that we live within a spieces balls?
I know right? It’s seriously challenging stellar evolution, galactic formation and makeup.
@@Repz98 … why is it in the ball?
is there a possibility that time is non linear after TBB allowing a more rapid assembly of materials? How might you test for that?
I love the JWST. It continues to prove that many scientists think they all got it figured out until someone comes along with a new huge dataset and says "Oh yeah?! Well explain that."
I love that the information is just flowing in now. JWST is a stupendous achievement. We’ve waited so many years.
Did it discover what was in Trump's secret vault?
I agree. I was so worried it would fail during unfolding or launch. This is really fantastic.
I was on the edge of my seat for years.
I honestly find the rate of discovery absolutely shocking. And to think we're going to be marveling at it for the next 20 years :D
We sure hope so!
It’s so exciting,we get to fill in a lot of the gaps and rewrite a lot of what we thought we knew about the universe. Hubble found so much we diddnt even think to look for, I’m sure the JWT will carry that on
🤞
@@dblair1258 if it can handle a meteor strike before it even started, it can endure anything!
Right!? It's only just scratched the surface! 😎
can you imagine what the jwst will find when it's finally doing long term observations and not the released quicky ones? consider my mind completely boggled
Yep, JWST was so well engineered it is far more powerful than expected. Well worth the time and investment.
I wanna see our galactic center
I'm waiting for a 120 hour exposure.
@@snieves4 same or even thru it
@@snieves4 ..it's black , and it's a hole .. I don't know where to start
...gravity has emptyed it of photon's...best bet of seeing it - go threw and quickly look back ,as you exit the worm hole , ness
...
WOW! Fascinating. This is the Cambrian explosion of the universe! Seems like the linear formation theory just got bent by Webb. This is the absolute BEST part of science, when massive curve balls are thrown and knowledge gets thrown for a loop. Proving once again, science is never really settled . Webb is really shredding papers and inspiring others. Truly exciting when new questions are being asked faster than old questions are being answered. It's the Cosmic Cambrian!
Huh? The universe is experiencing a rapid biological diversification? That makes no sense.
Bet someone got a PHD on the linear formation theory too. 👉😎
@@filonin2 He's refering to the rapid diversification of our theories as being analagous to the Cambrian explosion.
How are you so calm knowing we're having to rework nearly all of our understanding of the early universe and galaxies - from only the first few observations? This is mind blowingly scary - in a good way.
Love when you’ve just about finished the last Anton video and then he uploads a new one 🤩
Could these very old spiral disc galaxies be formed without Black Holes? I doubt it. Supermassive Black Holes properly where there from the beginning on / or they formed super fast from smaller Black Holes or something else..
First Super massive Black holes > Accumulation of dust/mass (which give the galaxies their shape) > then Star formation inside the galaxies. etc.
Astronomers and astronomy buffs are having a field day! What a great time to be alive! Hopefully I'll still be around when the next space telescope, with even better resolution than JWST, launches.
Same brotha im 24 rn and im excited for what we will have discovered by the time im mear my death bed
Not a chance for me! :-(
@@randomperson8991 Yah; I'm turning 46 in a couple of months. I really hope to see a super version of the JWST before I turn 70. 😁
JWST is going to smash many of the standard theories of the age, development and size of the universe. JWST may even seriously challenge the Big Bang theory. Time will tell. I'm looking forward to more of the long exposure, deep field images to come in. If anything, I just love to see the hubris of the academic world get humbled. Not in a malicious way, but in the sense that a good smashing of paradigms is healthy for scientific discovery. Thanks for keeping us updated!
Evidence so far has already invalidated the BB theory quite soundly, its just a matter of getting folks to admit it.
@@kennethferland5579 General Relativity has already been invalidated too. We need to toss out dark matter and dark energy and come up with a model that actually works.
@@kennethferland5579 No.
@@penguindrum264: Lol! Your denial is cute.
@@kennethferland5579; I think you are right. Before JWST was even launched, I would post comments that JWST would blow BB right out of the water. I was laughed at of course, now I'm the one chuckling.
James Webb! Keeps improving our imagination and our reality simultaneously
Imagine this time next year, all the stuff we find by then :O
Performing wonderfully despite a meteor hole in it.
The small meteor only slightly damaged one of the panels so the telescope just needed to be recalibrated then it’s fine to keep on keeping on
And working in deep cold while worrying not to overheat. What a rockstar!
I just want to thank you for keeping me updated on current science events.
Thank you for sharing! I love the sound of paradigms as they are falling down like raindrops and crash on the pavement. But as you say, it could also be something completely different!
This is a nice, unexpectedly poetic comment. :)
Another amazing video from a wonderful man! Thank you for sharing and for all the things you teach me, and everyone here. The world is a better place because you are in it, as the song goes, what a wonderful world.
So much love for Anton our absolute hero!
I am so happy about how well JWST is doing! I feel almost like Dr. Becky, as much as I feel like doing happy dances. 😊 As hard as today has been on me, I really, really badly needed some good news! Thank you for what you do, Anton!
Perspective shifting is great for helping with focus issues !
(it's nice to compare the weight the world on one's shoulders
(with the majestic grandness of the whole universe ! ) Cheers. B-)
I hope today is much better. Hoot 🦉
Why is this good news? Didn't the JWST prove many scientists wrong..
"Panic at the disks"
Astrophysicists are my favorite science nerds.
thank you! I have been worried that I was going to miss discoveries
You, Mr. Petrov, are a wonderful person and an excellent teacher. Thank you for making such difficult concepts graspable for us!
The problem I see with the red-shift expansion of the universe hypothesis is that it assumes that the fabric of space-time remains constant over space and time and hence the only variable must be relative velocity. Einstein made it clear that assuming the fabric of space is homogeneous (universal constants are indeed constants) then c is a constant. The problem is, we could never test or verify that the fabric of space remained a constant over all this time and distance. Our observations are based on a small sample in a small area of space and time and now we extrapolate it to the extremes. We do not know if properties of space changes during this expansion over time. We do know that curvature in space time such as gravity also cause red shifting (gravitational red shift) and that mass is moving apart making space less dense assuming expansion. The problem I have is that we start building so many facts on a foundation of assumptions in the absence of other important facts we dont know. We are like doing tests on waves in a glass of water and now extrapolating our findings to the rest of the ocean and you act surprise when your predictions are off with 90%. Then we are confused why 85% of mass cannot be explained. I believe getting behind the true nature of the fabric space and time is critical before any of these observations are meaningful. We need to think of the big bang as the creation of space and time and not the creation of matter, matter is just a typical consequence. We are in a galaxy ourselves and know little about how it, its gasses and gravity distorts our observations. We just take a snapshot and assume that what we see is what we get.
All this is exciting, but we will not know what we are really looking at until the fundamentals are figured out. A problem with current science is that it accepts what we know as truth, while truth is the sum of what we know and what we do not know. So the facts we know do not give us the truth, it only gives us an observation. We need to learn more about the fabric of space itself.
We dont know if the fabric of space has boundaries, if the boundaries are hard or gradual, if the boundaries are constant or expanding and what happens to energy when it meets those boundaries, physics at this stage suggest that if such boundaries exist that this energy may be reflecting back if it cannot be absorbed. If these boundaries are moving, red shift can apply to the reflection of such boundaries. if the boundaries form a perfect sphere then it can act like a concave mirror with magnification properties or if not, it acts like a distorting mirror or a diffuser. Until we figure this out, we do not know what we are truly looking at. For all we know we may be looking at reflections of a much smaller universe, from different angles distorted in different ways from different periods of time getting red shifted by a moving and distorted boundary.
Some part of what we see is real and true, but some part is illusive and we still cannot tell them apart.
Imagine yourself being a microbe with the life span of 1s. you are in a river flowing down a mountain and perhaps finding yourself now in calm puddle. You look at shock waves, image them and make observations,you dont know what water is as your entire existence is part of it but you know its there and affect what you observe. You only look at the energy waves around you learn about it for 1ms and the images you got from all these shock waves you can absorb and observe, you make a picture of your observations and try to determine where you are and were you come from, where the water you dont even know what it is come from and behave and try to extrapolate beyond the river to possible oceans. Everything you get is accurate, but what they mean, where they come from can be illusive as these waves reflect and refract all over these unknown boundaries. Some waves may be stretched or compressed, some may be traveling for hours, bouncing up and down, get curved by whirlpools in system with both order and chaos. Your observations are perfect with accurate instruments, but what are you looking at if you dont know what water is, how the environment affect it and its properties and what the nature of their boundaries are or know much about the water cycle even. This is what I mean when I say, what we observe is both real and illusive at the same time. We are both accurate and wrong at the same time. We have a lot of facts and still little truth at the same time. This is the most difficult problem for science to solve and it has always been the biggest problem for science throughout history. The paradox is that the more we think we know, the less we actually know.
Just imagine if science would have discounted Einstein's theory after Tesla said it was crap.
One day it just might be revealed that the Universe is actually Plasma and Birkland Currents
Pretty good thinking there. Basic questions (like HOW space-time are/is defined) depend on the observer, and since we are in and of it, we cannot stand outside to look at it's edges, limits, nor compare it to anything observable outside of it. We come to the problem of metaphysics, aka study through analogous reasoning, and cannot agree how best to use it. We assume mathematics is key but do not know why this form of thinking gives us so much useful information. Indeed, the very definition of thinking is problematic since we have to use it to define it. Black holes or worm holes hold fewer puzzles than our own thought processes.
Happy Birthday, Macy. To have a galaxy named after you is quite a gift in my opinion.
As soon as james web operates in such low temperatures, nobody can say it isn't cool!!!!
That the results are somewhat different to what Astrophysicists expected is excitedly humbling 🥰
Coming up on 200K for the fundraiser! WHOOO!!!
Very interesing summary Anton. Many thanks for the explanation on Red-Shift distance measuring. Thoroughly enjoyable.
Wow. How totally fascinating! It seems that the more we learn about the universe, the more we realize that we just don't know, and the the more questions that we have.
I love how JWST now seems to be throwing the Astrophysics and Cosmology fields into chaos as we learn all sorts of new things about the age of the oldest Galaxies, and everything associated with that, the age of the oldest stars, etc..
Such a great time to be alive and "tuned-in" and able to watch closely as we push back the boundaries of knowledge!
those galaxies are the same age as the Milky Way, someone from them looking at us would see the milky way as well as how it looked 14 billion years ago.
@@TheTroyc1982 yes, 14 billion or so old galaxies apparently from a few million years after the universe was magically spawned into existence.
Wonder what dark magic they'll conjure up to explain that.
Anton, Anton, Anton... I am so sorry about your loss. SIDS is a nightmare and I thought about it every day as my recent infant became more of a tweener/toddler. I will continue to worry about mine with this warning, but I want to send you my absolute heart founded condolence. You're a good man and I thank you for all you do for me and for others in educating us, my only wish is that I could relieve you of even a tiny bit of pain. I hope you can find some good mental health assistance and ways to cope as you move on with life. I will continue to think about you from my tiny spot over here on Mother Earth.
(I donated a 20 spot, wish I could do more)
If someone in one of those highly red-shifted galaxies were to look at the Milky Way galaxy, they would see US, in the Milky Way, as being highly red-shifted and as " being one of the earliest galaxies" to have formed after the BB. ( Which would be an incorrect deduction).
This is why some of the "earliest galaxies" we are seeing with JWST seem to be already well-formed into spirals or bars.
It's all relative.
We can never know the "beginning" due to the limitations of time itself.
Thanks Anton..... I'm so happy that you are hanging in there .......sure do like your videos
Well, imagine that! We thought we knew stuff based on new discovery over time. Now we realize that we are just like the brilliant folks from Centuries past that thought they knew stuff. We know more than ever, possibly, yet there is so much more to learn. I think this is a good lesson missed on most of mankind. I hope we continue to learn and learn in peace, most of all.
I’ve always had a love of astronomy since I was a little kid, but I think JWST has helped me to actually decide on that as a career path.
Thank you so much your videos. 🙏🏼
Wow James Web blowing scientist minds all over the globe! Now they have their work cut out for them to explain these new findings. Can't wait to see what all they figure out, and especially if it explains a few things that were yet unexplained or mysterious. That's why science is so freaking cool!
All of this is SOOOOOO EXCITING! Anton, thank you for what you do. Your ability to make this understandable to layman allows me to be part of what will be the most amazing scientific discoveries in the history of history. Again, thank you from the bottom of my laymen space nerd heart.
Thanks Anton. I can't think of a better astronomical subject than this.
FINALLY!!! Someone actually talking about the disc galaxies! This has been wrecking my brain for a while now.
TY Anton for putting a telescope under the microscope.🔭🔬
Anton. with your level of 'Integrity', you could teach MY grandchildren with all my blessings!
I love this so much! Anything that doesn't conform to our expectations excites me. Whenever we get close to thinking that we might understand...honestly anything, I desperately hope that we will find something to blow that idea out of the water. I hate the idea of knowing everything because that means there is nothing more to discover. What a horribly sad place to exist in. I want eternal discovery!
We are FAR from knowing everything. People many, many years ago lamented the exact same thing. In fact, they thought we had already arrived. There was nothing to worry about.
I think as long as the platypus exists, we will always have something that we will never truly understand. The males are poisonous, the females lay eggs yet produce milk, they're decended from the same extinct animal as the echidna, and to top it all off, they glow under a black light. If we can sort that amazing mess out, the universe will be a walk in the park 😅
I really enjoy the fact that almost all new observations comes with a bunch of new questions. Wish I had the balls to dream big and go for becoming an astrophysicist instead of choosing the easy way dropping out of school and be a criminal. (Not criminal anymore but I have to jump trough lots of hoops to get anywhere career wise)
Macys dad just set that bar extremely high. “My daddy named an ancient galaxy after me” lol. Boyfriend: ohhhh ok :-(
There is another possibility, and that's that the universe is far older than scientists surmise. I've also wondered if there could be things so far away that their light hasn't even reached us yet. It does feel like a lot of current theories are based on the principle that we are able to see the full extent of the universe from our microscopic speck of existence on earth, which is basically a scientific version of the old religious belief of us being the centre of everything.
I like the way you think. What if the point as far as we can see happens to be the center of the big bang and we happen to see just a slice of pizza like potion of the universe cause we happen to be located near the perimeter crust on thst slice?
@@fuijika Bro, I also have the feeling of earth being the center of the universe. I don't know why I feel this way. Could it be something we don't know all this time? I might be wrong but that's how I feel. Do you think there are modern scientist who believe the earth as a center of the universe?
There are things so far away, that their light will _never_ reach us, because due to the expansion of space, they are receding faster than light itself.
@@dreadinside654 Nothing is set in stone, that's why these are theories, one us us might be right as none of us probably are. Theories that sticks are those that fit with everyting else untill something like the jwst gives us more data to either affirme or bebunk these theories. Have fun thinking what seems best for you while no data says otherwize.
@@fuijika true there was no absolute truth in theories and theories do change over time by new and latest findings. And don't be surprised if one day we found out the sun is the one that orbits the earth not otherwise. Hahaha.
Anton, I will join you in this journey, each and every day! Thank you so much for your hard work....
Thanks for being so diligent on keeping us up to date, you're awesome. Can't wait to see what jwst shows us in long term studies
I'm so sorry to read that you recently lost your child. Its unfathomable the pain you and your family must be feeling and again, I'm so sorry. Having a scientific mind I am not a religious person, but something still moves me inside that there is a light for us to feel love after this life. With that said, I hope God and the angels are with you and are comforting you in this time of terrible sorrow. I love you my friend. Thank you for your amazing videos
I love science and how new evidence can mean a total rethink.
With so many discoveries in such a short period of time, your comment on imagine how much will be discovered by the end of the year is a mind blowing thought.
At some point they will have to accept their models were wrong and the universe is much older than 13.5 billion years.
Thank you from ontario Canada. Take care of yourself. You are educating people of all ages and economic levels around the world and we greatly appreciate you. The way you speak shows your love of knowledge and you share this excitement of learning with every video. Again thank you.
You seem to be such a good person. Thank you for making your channel and teaching your research
Thank you for another WONDERFUL video. I’m always excited when I see a new one posted! Could listen to Anton talk about space and show these amazing images for hours!
Looking forward to the current standard model of the formation of the universe effectively broken by more and more JWST observations of far distant objects.
Yeah, time for something new.
@@Mosern1977 Before thay happens, though, I AM interested to learn abouy what convoluted “refinement” of the prevailing early universe model keepers-of-the-status-quo will dream up to explain all of these glaring anomalies.
@@mumblesbadly7708 - Dark Bonding. Makes matter glue together much faster than we see today. This explains how galaxies that are 10+ billion years old form have managed to get so old in a few hundred million years .
LOL, I love that the paper mentioned is called "Panic! At the Discs" From MySpace to scientific discovery.
its insane that we can make a telescope that can see that far back, im actually so excited to see what we can find in the coming years
We already could see further back than that using radio astronomy when we imaged the Cosmic Microwave Background which is from when the universe was only 380,000 years old.
I am so sorry for the loss of Ur child…I hope U & Ur family are supported and loved. 🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏
Pretty impressive for such a chaotic species........it really puts the kibosh on the theory that we're alone in the universe. With so many galaxies how can we be alone?
Anton looks so serious throughout his videos, then right at the end he gives this huge smile like the happiest kid ever.
I just love that! And always look forward to his smile because it just warms my heart.
As long as there are other happy Earthlings in the world, there is something for me to be happy about too.
❤🌍🌎🌏
read his donate now section. its heartbreaking
Imagine if intelligent life had evolved elsewhere in the cosmos but was lacking in light sensitive organs. They would not be able to perceive the visible universe as we do and would possibly be totally unaware of it's overall existence. Our eyes are a miracle.
Preaty much like how deep sea fish must be like. I am preaty sure they are unaware there's a pletora of life on the gound till they get caught by a fisherman and don't survive to share it, if they are able to share complex info in a way we don't understand.
Sight is such a fundamental sense that it has evolved separately several times. I think if a species evolved to be “intelligent” then they would almost certainly have sight. But it is an interesting conjecture!
Maybe they are around us. But, invisible to us . Darkness comprises 99.73 percent of the universe. It comes in three forms: ordinary dark matter, exotic dark matter, and dark energy. Of these forms, dark energy is predominant; That leave about 0.27 percent which is visible.
I stand by a previous post; I truly hope that humanity has the creativity, intelligence and philosophical fortitude to observe, understand and what we may discover. Thanks Anton!
I think that over time we'll find out that a lot of the info we have on the early universe will change so dramatically that many of the scientists working on these things will be hanging out with their therapists for much more intensive therapy. Or if they don't have a therapist now they will. The fact that they found all of those heavy elements at such an early time is mind blowing. That alone suggests things that no one is prepared to believe. Go Go James Webb!!!!! Thanks Anton!!!
We are only a few months in and already we have to start questioning our understanding of the universe. Thanks Anton
The JWST is amazing, great steps beyond our previous great step Hubble. Can't help but wonder whats next...
I have just been utterly blown away at the JWTS already. The single most important piece of technology ever created at the hand of man is undoubtedly the Hubble Space Telescope. The JWTS has surpassed it and the amount of discovery already learned from it is mind-boggling. And we are just in the age of infancy in terms of what we will ultimately develop and learn. Just amazing.
Maybe early galaxies had less gravitational effects on them from outside forces so they formed faster and got bigger
I would have thought the opposite: Because everything was closer together, massive objects could attract more matter more easily.
For me, James Webb is creating a new base line for discovery about the universe. This is awesome.
I bet the wonderful people who worked on JWST are so proud of themselves, and they should be!!! :DD
Love your show Anton . I am a huge fan .
It is so easy for me to keep up with the latest cosmological news by listening to you as a podcast.
First thought is that the early universe was much more crowded and matter was more densely distributed causing these unusual results that don't happen today.
Clearly the authors of that paper were Smiths fans; "Panic! At the Disks". This is an excellent channel Anton, thank you for it.
Maybe! but it's more likely a direct reference to Panic! At the Disco; An incredibly popular singer for the last 15-20 years.
It seems like the assumptions about the entire early development of the university are questionable now. Can't wait for new conclusions from this
Thanks for the work you do mate, I never miss a day as its always interesting. You got me excited about Webb
@4:09 there is a 18.2 Red Shift indicated in the image shown so that would make that one the furthest unless its a typo in label on the image?
Actually Anton likely misinterpreted that image. In their original context the numbers were used to refer to families of lensed galaxies, the 18 refers to the 18th galaxy on their list will the 2 after the point refering to the 2nd mirror image of that galaxy found.
that one paper said "panic! at the disks" 🤣🤣
The other conclusion that can be drawn is that the time it takes for stars to evolve from hydrogen to oxygen stars is correct and the time to form spiral galaxies is correct thus the big bang occurred much earlier than one thought.
Or the evolution from hydrogen to oxygen stars was more rapid back in the early universe and there could have been a different concentration of dark matter in the earlier universe and thus galaxies could have formed much faster back then.
or universe is infinitively old and big bang is just one out of unaccountable number of big bangs and JWST simply looked far enough to see the older universe from before our big bang,
Or it was created by God.
@@tonyabrown7796 no.
@@tonyabrown7796 when u are in heaven ask him and let us know😂😂😂😂.
You maybe disappointed and just meet the full force of mother nature recycling all the stored energy in your decaying body and making good use of it and ensuring life on earth continues.
Personally this is the creators intentions, its plan is in our faces, we use science to reveal it and to sustain life on earth and and beyond.
The creator has given us something immensely precious....life... it is limited but in its limit we are challenged to prepare the way for ourselves and also future life.
From the JWST findings:
How did you conclude that the time it takes for stars to evolve from hydrogen to oxygen stars is correct?
How did you conclude that the time to form spiral galaxies is correct?
How did you conclude that the big bang occurred much earlier than one thought?
How did you conclude that the evolution from hydrogen to oxygen stars was more rapid back in the early universe?
What evidences prove that concentration of dark matter in the earlier universe is different from later evidences? And, how much difference?
i loved space since i was first learning to read, i always needed to know more, i loved the hubble telescope and the moon missions, but this really makes me happy, it practically made me cry how beautiful it was. what a world we live in
Did anyone else see the joke that a French astro physicist pulled concerning JWST? He posted a picture of a slice Chorizo sausage and said it was a close up of nearby Proxima Centauri star. And when you 1st look at it you might think it was a close up direct image of a red giant star.
Thousands of people fell for it. Needless to say he had to publish an apology.
🤣🤣🤣 Love it!!!
You can see the image here on TH-cam by visiting V101 SCIENCE Channel. Image with more complete story.
TOO FUNNY!
@Cancer McAids Agree 100%!
But we live in an age of idiotic hyper political correctness and everyone gets their panties in a wad over anything remotely humorous. People can no longer laugh at themselves. That's a very bad sign for humanity.
This guy came up with a good joke about his own profession and had to apologize to keep his job. Personally, I think he deserves an award. I'd certainly like to shake his hand. 🤝
Cheers to Anton for his very relatable vlogs especially for laymen like me. He manages to keep my focus and interest through to the end of his vlogs.
I love it!! Time to start rethinking how wrong cosmologist have been and still are. There's so much unknown that I laugh when they figure something out that makes them wrong about something else. Love your channel! Keep it up
They laugh too. Scientists don't see "being wrong" as bad because it means we just learned something new. Then new questions and research arises.
@@das_it_mane I agree. It's just that they're so damn confident when they discover something.
@@robryan516
And, the average people do not have enough discernment to even suspect that many of their findings are really based upon assumption upon assumption.
@@robryan516 are they though? Seems to be more of a problem with science reporting. The way JOURNALISTS report stuff is sensationalized and clickbaity. Then you go read the study and it's filled with what the researchers themselves point out as shortcomings, blindspots, possible issues with their study, and usually always end with "more research is needed".
@@das_it_mane what kind of sciences are you working on?
Red shift can easily be understood by listening to any moving sound coming towards you compressed, then past you uncompressed. Like a siren, car or plane. One sound as it appears another lower in frequency once it has passed.
The Doppler Effect?
Hey my man!
If it was relatively common for early galaxies to be very red due to lacking stars... doesnt that just make a lot of sense since stars take a long time to form?
This brings a whole lot of questions for someone like me (i.e. not educated in astronomy). How sure are we about our understanding of the development if the expansion of the universe? Do we need to assume that all galaxies started to form in approximately the same time? Would it be possible for the oldest galaxies be ‘destroyed’ (up to a point not being recognized as such) over time?
Those are the answers jwst are helping us to understand :)
Great questions. I always wondered what would happen if we discovered a galaxy older than we predicted the universe was? We say the universe is 13.7 billion years old. What if we discovered a 15 billion year old galaxy? What does that change? Lol
Stay wonderful, Anton, and thank you.
Does the 20+ red-shift (increasing) data potentially suggest that the universe formed earlier than our current hypothesis? IE, the deeper we can see, the deeper it seems to go?
No, cosmic background radiation has redshift of 1089, so 20 is a very small number.
@@olasek7972 Thanks. I think my understanding of this subject is far too basic to even pose rational questions to Anton. lol
Once again, the most informative, un-hyped, unbiased video yet!
im dying to find out what the secret stuff they were looking at - the first couple of weeks. they had a few weeks where they were pointed at stuff not for public display.
So
A) Galaxy’s formed much earlier then expected,
B) the Universe is actually older then there last calculation of 13.8 Billion years ( I recall one book in the early 80s had 25billion )
C) The redshift that denotes the **current** distance does not denote the age of the object, merely its distance.
During the formation of the universe there was a single moment where the universe expanded faster than the speed of light.
It ripped space itself apart so violently that it broke causality, which is the reason of things being 93 billion light years away right now instead of 13.8 billion light years.
In our reality (cuz causality cannot break anymore) nothing we see exceeded the speed of light because instead of it having traveled faster; we see more redshift.
I wonder if this will ever point to finding out we may be too far away from the "origin" of the universe, if the unobservable universe is actually many times larger than the observable universe.
if you’re talking about a point in space where everything in the universe “blew up”, there is no such thing.
rather, ALL of matter/energy AND space were compressed into a single point.
another way of looking at it is, imagine space being represented by the surface of a balloon. the stars/galaxies represented by dots on that balloon’s surface. as the balloon keeps getting bigger, those dots on the surface keep getting further away from each other.
space is like the surface of that balloon.
good point.
Great info! The great puzzle is why it is that the further back we look, the more we see highly developed galaxies with relatively heavy elements. Almost as if it all was created intact and in process…
I am eagerly awaiting the first signs of civilisation(s) beyond our own with this telescope
Anton...ti klasniy TH-camr!!! Spasibo za videos!! Ya ochen mnoga panimayu tiper!!!
I don't want to sound sarcastic; but with more advanced instruments, the more we realised that the universe is not as simple as we tought or tought we knew before.
Anton,
I couldn't imagine your horror. My prayers go out to you and yours, my friend.
On a different note, love your channel.
We keep looking farther and farther back, and instead of verifying the predictions of the big bang model, we keep seeing galaxies just like the ones nearby. What do you call a model that consistently makes wrong predictions?
Scientific.
I'm more spiritual.
The is no end.
big bang isn't getting disproven at all tho anywhere. like 97% of scientists agree big bang happened 14 billion years ago that "created" time and space how we understand it.
@@crabguy34 the best model that doesn't fit the data... 🤣
They're not "just like the ones nearby" -- they're considerably smaller by several orders of magnitude, denser, and hotter, with more gas, much larger stars, and a different mix of chemistry. What you're saying is like looking at da Vinci's painting of the Mona Lisa and the prehistoric cave art in Lascaux, France, and saying they're identical because they're both painted. Look deeper than that.
I think that longer wavelengths will enable us to see even further and with every new observation we will find early galaxies that appear older than we expected. Remember my words.
Your words I WILL remember as well as Arp's words