No. Obi-tori-gaeshi is a completely different technique where you grab the leg and belt and rotate towards the belt-hand side (clockwise if you're right-handed) while lifting the leg. Obi-tori-gaeshi is te-waza. The technique in this video is hikkomi gaeshi; it is ma-sutemi-waza. It has two variants, both of which are demonstrated here by Jane Bridge: one where you roll backwards and one where you twist underneath. Watch this if you don't believe me: th-cam.com/video/VhH3rXs6cdE/w-d-xo.html
@libertarian_ramblings the Coton website does in fact show what you are describing, Obi -Tori Gaeshi as a standing te waza technique, and Hikkikomi Gaeshi as a ma-tsutemi technique. I think it has been an effect of time and change in the kodokan which has lead to the confusion. Sumi-gaeshi in my opinion is part of the confusion because of the angle of entering. It’s 45° from the Ike’s corner, rather than facing.
The 2 person speaking at the back is disrespectful when sensei is teaching
Hikkomi gaeshi
Hikikomi-gaeshi = Tachi-Waza. Obi-tori-gaeshi pour le Ne Waza. Nous nous basons sur monsieur Katanishi pour le nom.
No. Obi-tori-gaeshi is a completely different technique where you grab the leg and belt and rotate towards the belt-hand side (clockwise if you're right-handed) while lifting the leg. Obi-tori-gaeshi is te-waza. The technique in this video is hikkomi gaeshi; it is ma-sutemi-waza. It has two variants, both of which are demonstrated here by Jane Bridge: one where you roll backwards and one where you twist underneath. Watch this if you don't believe me: th-cam.com/video/VhH3rXs6cdE/w-d-xo.html
@libertarian_ramblings the Coton website does in fact show what you are describing, Obi -Tori Gaeshi as a standing te waza technique, and Hikkikomi Gaeshi as a ma-tsutemi technique. I think it has been an effect of time and change in the kodokan which has lead to the confusion. Sumi-gaeshi in my opinion is part of the confusion because of the angle of entering. It’s 45° from the Ike’s corner, rather than facing.
show