Continuous-cover forestry - a modern version of old-fashioned forestry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @davidmijoc1249
    @davidmijoc1249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great video!

  • @Logjam5
    @Logjam5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Selective harvesting, shelter-wood and gap felling processes yield less profits on the on set, however the necessary silvicuture costs associated with clear-cutting: seed collection, seedling development, block site prep, tree planting , etc are significant. The discussed alternate harvest processes rely primarily on natural regeneration, and these process would save considerably for sustainability of the stands.
    Like your TH-cam channel; I can only understand the episodes containing English caption's, unfortunately :)

    • @jussilahteenmaki3475
      @jussilahteenmaki3475 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not to forget the price difference between timber and pulpwood. Usually the selective cutting kind of methods are producing bigger % of timber than pulpwood the rotation time of a clear cut area.
      Väldigt bra video!

    • @alanbrooke144
      @alanbrooke144 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The other consideration to consider is that under a clear cut system, all the profit comes at once, while under CCF the individual payments are less but profits are regularly spread over a longer time frame.

  • @glps6167
    @glps6167 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too much emphasis on the economics of selective cutting forests, not enough emphasis on the ecological aspects. I was concerned to see tree harvesters utilized in selective cutting forests; no word being said on their impact on forest soil.

    • @dengueberries
      @dengueberries 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah I'd love to see the ecological impact comparison instead of monetary points