For me I'd add 'Tone' to the list. I'll forgive a movie's many sins if it makes me feel a certain way consistently, even if the story takes a back seat.
@@josuepena269 All Wes Anderson movies, Uncut Gems, 2001 a space odyssey. I agree story is king, but tone is one of most important things for me as well.
@@josuepena269 perhaps david lynch films? Eraserhead is a big one for me in relation to this - the tone felt perfect although the story was basically nonsensical. I know it depicts a nightmare or feelings of anxiety but I'd like to hear your opinions on this
Script writing and storytelling are the same thing but that makes story 3 out of 7 of the things you mentioned so I'd say it's the most important thing of the most important things
"Art is a human activity consisting in this, that one man consciously, by means of certain external signs, hands on to others feelings he has lived through, and that other people are infected by these feelings, and also experience them." - Leo Tolstoy
For me the depth in characters or how beautifully they are written - their strength, vulnerabilities, flaws , motivations I mean 3- dimensional characters how raw and realistic they are - is another point which makes a movie.great
This is true. This is also why marketing plays a role in how a film is remembered. A slower paced mystery or suspense film shouldn't be advertised as a bustling action flick.
@@embeddedsanctuary4348marketing isn't the movie when people look back on movies their focus isn't going to be on the marketing they might acknowledge some of the marketing like a trailer and stuff but the majority of their critique on the movie will be on ahem the movie itself lol
I like 'aha' moments eg when a character realises how to do something or understand something, in movies such as 'the dambusters' , 'the magic box', 'close encounters...', 'rain man', 'UFO' etc.
Definitely agree with these points. For me beautiful visuals certainly help. Story not being too predictable. Filmmaker makes a film out of passion for the subject rather than just because they are a famous filmmaker. Why is it soo many filmmakers who start out great produce terrible films later in their careers? Why do they lose their spark?
Great analysis. I think first of all a story worth telling, good actors, no plotholes, no fluff, no unnecessary scenes that add nothing, no political agenda, good music that doesnt have to play in ever scene, good lighting - not like the dark lighting modern movies choose, a limited dynamic range in sound that doesnt have me mixing the movie because the scenes with whispering vs explosions/gunshots are annoying, no cliches and no predictability, also copying stories from the 40/50s is boring, i want a original, nice cinematography, no shaky cameras or cutting the scenes every half a second, long shots are way more immersive, no „stupid“ character that behave without rational, a „chamber“ movie with limited scenes is way better than having the characters fly across half the world every 10 minutes in the movie as it adds nothing, scripts that let the actors speak in a natural way and not in a way that ruins the immersion because its so stilted, having attractive actors is a bonus - if all the rest of the cinematography is beautiful then so should the actors be - movies are watched for the visual pleasure. Explosions/effects and cgi mostly dont add anything to the story and have been seen many times - they add no excitement. And finaly an actual ending - open endings suck and are lazy screenwriting.
I think what makes a movie great is if it makes you feel something or challenges you like makes you think of something in a new light. Usually that's what makes them classics or good movies because you remember how you felt when you watched it for the first time.
You obviously don't have nuance as a person which makes you fit right in With the majority of the rest of today's population. There are technical aspects of movies that are objective in quality.. Avengers endgame is objectively a better made film than 1990's Captain Annerica in just about every aspect.. From the film making to the acting... Disputing that would be just plain silly... But, as an individual you might still enjoy that Captain America movie more than Avengers endgame.. And sometimes there is no real explanation as to why other than you just simply Enjoy that Captain America film better. For whatever reason it has more rewatchability for you.. And nobody has the ability or right to tell you you're wrong. . Because you're not wrong. Because enjoyment of art is entirely and 100% subjective. Despite there clearly being objectivity in the quality of each film from a technical filmmaking standpoint
@@InShaneMedia your argument starts of with a personal attack which is always a bad start, and then you convolute and add to what I said. I said art was objective, I never said people's enjoyment of art was objective. You need to read things before responding to them.
Ive watched hundreds of film, but my most favorite is Paranormal activity (the first). I know theres lots of better film, but PA gave the most influence on me. Simply because until this very second it made me couldn't sleep with lights off alone. Great movie doesnt have to be well written and beautiful.
That's easy! A film's greatness is determined by how much I like it! That's it! A film's greatness is a matter of opinion. While most people like therefore consider a flick like, say, "Pulp Fiction", great, there are some people who don't like it therefore think it's a terrible flick. But just because someone refuses to call "Pulp Fiction" a great film therefore doesn't like it, it doesn't mean that they should be bullied for speaking their mind against the general consensus. There is no place for snobbery in art, cinema included. People should like whatever they want and classify things in anyway they want, too and should not be disrespected for doing so. I for one am getting extremely sick of cinematic dogma that goes around. Again, "greatness" is different in each person's opinion, and, to me, it is inseparable from intense pleasure. There is absolutely no reason why I would call something "great" if I hate it. That would be self-deprecating and frankly self-contradictory. If I hate something or someone, they are bad to me. This also applies to film.
All movie opinions are subjective, what one person likes another person dislikes, no one is right or wrong about their opinions of certain movies, so if one person considers a movie a classic but another doesn't it does not mean either person is right or wrong it's all in the eye of the beholder.
That's like saying since some people like to rape, and some don't, no one is right in saying if rape is good or bad. I think like with most things in a democracy, the majority should own the credibility to create definitions, determine what is good and bad. Individuals can still have their beliefs but majority often times speaks the best truth we have available, you can't expect to innovate at all without considering majority opinion. This is to point out that the term subjective is useless, it serves no purpose but to just make you feel good about your decisions and beliefs as an individual.
@@SHDEdits But all movie opinions are subjective because it's up to the individual if they like or dislike a certain movie, I don't care if a movie get's praise by the majority if I don't personally like it doesn't mean I'm wrong it just doesn't speak to me and vice versa if the majority dislikes a movie and I like it doesn't mean I'm wrong again. It's all to do with personal tastes and what movie speaks to us and how much we enjoy a movie. Howard the Duck (1986) is mostly disliked by the majority but I love it, doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just speaks to me.
@@SHDEdits Well are you right or wrong for liking or disliking a certain food. It's all to do with tastes, statistics are just numbers, it doesn't speak for the individual person.
I am form India and i want to become a script writer. But i started to watch world movies when i was 17 untill that i mainly watched local movies which were not too good. I started to think about script writing as a career only after watching some great international movies. Many people say that film making talent is inborn but i am not like that. So can i pursue my dream
I loved this video, I also agree with all that was listed for a great film. I particularly think that an actor who’s got a full understanding and full Emerson into their character along with the precise direction form their filmmaker will take the film over the top and make it one of the greatest films made. This is, I believe in my humble opinion one of the key ingredients to making movie magic !
They should feel way more pressure to produce quality. Increasing number of films nowadays have more to do with identity politics and other such nonsense than creative storytelling.
@@k0rppi259 That appears to be a common theme these days. How long will it last I don't know. I think it's great that filmmaking resources are more available to people, however this means a higher volume of garbage to sift through.
@@k0rppi259 Everyone says this but it is just not true that identity politics are taking over entertainment. Name me 5 movies that do. I'm sure you'll be able to, I'm just wondering what movies you'll name.
@@visualsforyou7120 I didn't say identity politics is taking over entertainment, I said the amount of it is increasing at the cost of quality storytelling. I'm sure there will never be a time when every movie is about social justice, but I am concerned about the trend. I'm hesitant to just produce a random list of movies, because I don't think you really understood what I was saying. I didn't mean to say that every movie nowadays is filled with SJW rhetoric, but the trend is towards that. The movie studios are more concerned about the political views of their writers, directors and actors than their skill in their profession and to me that is not a promising sign for the future. It doesn't matter how socially conscious writing staff you have if they can't produce quality entertainment or even tell a coherent story. I should clarify that I'm not against equality and all that, I just think filmmakers should concentrate on the actual movie and the story they want to tell, instead of thinking how they can make sure their cast and crew represents all the racial and sexual minorities of USA. Look at Nomadland, Star Wars and the new 007 movie. None are that bad and none are exactly filled with the SJW message, but the driving force behind these movies was social justice, not storytelling and you can see that in the finished product. Look at Marvel superhero movies and all the numerous remakes of sci-fi and fantasy classics that are replacing beloved, established, well thought-out characters with soulless cardboard cutouts of actual people and feminist power fantasies. Look at Enola Holmes, completely pointless movie that would never have been made if not for the social justice movement fanning the flames of hatred and resentment toward anyone that's white, male and straight. What I'm concerned about is the message this sends, which is that you can attain success by signaling certain political views even if you have no skills at what you do. Do you honestly think this mindset doesn't translate into more progressive, yet less talented people being hired to make movies?
@k0rppi My opinions on the movies you mentioned: - I've never understood how people have seen anything relating to social justice in the new Star Wars movies. You have to seriously be looking out for it to find anything. What, Rey is a woman? I get that she's sort of a bland character and is basically a worse Luke Skywalker but her being female has nothing to do with that. Plenty of characters in the new Star Wars movies were underdeveloped and it's not like Star Wars has ever been a goldmine for amazing writing. A character being a woman while having insane amounts of power in a universe where characters have insane amounts of power doesn't imply there's some social justice undertones. - I don't think Nomadland was ever meant to have a strict plot. You're saying social justice is what made it have less of a plot when it's pretty clear they were going for a more documentary-esque feel in the first place. Throughout the movie Fern just goes from job to job and meets random people and it's clear a more loose plot is what they were going for from a filmmaking standpoint. Nomadland is also supposed to be a much more real, thought-provoking movie than Star Wars or No Time to Die. Of course it was going to have commentary on the economy when it's main character is going through a financial crisis. To me its commentary did not detract from the movie whatsoever and it made _perfect_ sense for it to be there. It didn't feel pandering in any way either. Everything Fern said sounded like something Fern would genuinely believe. - I don't see how there is anything relating to social justice in the new Bond either. What, there's a woman who can shoot a gun and is physically capable? Woooah, how insane that a character is able to do well in combat and be snarky in a _Bond_ movie. If it was a white man instead of a black woman who had the same personality shown in the trailers, literally no one would be complaining. The fact the new 007 is a black woman is not relevant at all yet everyone is still whining about it. I haven't seen the movie yet but I heard from a pretty known critic that James Bond even gets the title of 007 back. People seriously just spread a lie about the character replacing James Bond when there was no proof of it at all, and, surprise surpise, it ended up not happening. Also I just want to make sure, you've seen No Time to Die as of the time you said that, right? It's not out in some countries so I want to make sure. This is also coming from a straight white male, the group apparently recieving so much hate from movies. In my opinion you have to be really sensitive to watch these movies and feel attacked in any way.
It has become obvious to me that people who say this just don't watch many movies. There are an abundance of special movies with outstanding filmmaking coming out _every_ year. You just have to look past some of the most popular movies since a lot can be pretty generic. Even then, we still get artistic blockbusters like this year's Dune.
Special effects are not a proof of a good or bad film. They are a tool to create a world. When they are used well, they can be astonishing and memorable for all the right reasons (Jurassic Park). When not they can be an overblown mess (Ready Player One).
Not a rarity though there's not a large amount like before. Also it depends on what kind of cinema you’re viewing. South Korea is one country that consistently produces quality cinema in these times.
Hey I have found your channel really helpful. But I find your plugs for your sponsors really annoying. Could you just put them at the very end of the video so we don't have to watch them?
The first 1000 people to use this link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare: skl.sh/indepthcine09211
For me I'd add 'Tone' to the list. I'll forgive a movie's many sins if it makes me feel a certain way consistently, even if the story takes a back seat.
Could you give some examples, I've always heard story is king and have tended to agree with that
@@josuepena269 I think Days of Heaven by Tarrence Malick is a good one.
@@josuepena269 All Wes Anderson movies, Uncut Gems, 2001 a space odyssey. I agree story is king, but tone is one of most important things for me as well.
@@josuepena269 perhaps david lynch films? Eraserhead is a big one for me in relation to this - the tone felt perfect although the story was basically nonsensical. I know it depicts a nightmare or feelings of anxiety but I'd like to hear your opinions on this
@@josuepena269in the mood for Love........Wong kar wai
I love these videos. They are so calming, yet entertainming and informative at the same time!
The script , writing , actors , cinematography, the storytelling, the film layout, and the movie director
Also the score and the editing of a film
Wow no way
Script writing and storytelling are the same thing but that makes story 3 out of 7 of the things you mentioned so I'd say it's the most important thing of the most important things
"Art is a human activity consisting in this, that one man consciously, by means of certain external signs, hands on to others feelings he has lived through, and that other people are infected by these feelings, and also experience them." - Leo Tolstoy
For me the depth in characters or how beautifully they are written - their strength, vulnerabilities, flaws , motivations I mean 3- dimensional characters how raw and realistic they are - is another point which makes a movie.great
It's also knowing what the audience wants, for example action films doesn't need to have great actors but rather actors who are convincing on screen.
This is true. This is also why marketing plays a role in how a film is remembered. A slower paced mystery or suspense film shouldn't be advertised as a bustling action flick.
So basically his point about casting
@@embeddedsanctuary4348marketing isn't the movie when people look back on movies their focus isn't going to be on the marketing they might acknowledge some of the marketing like a trailer and stuff but the majority of their critique on the movie will be on ahem the movie itself lol
Loved it, so great I stumbled upon this channel. Can't wait to use these videos when I teach my film class.
I like 'aha' moments eg when a character realises how to do something or understand something, in movies such as 'the dambusters' , 'the magic box', 'close encounters...', 'rain man', 'UFO' etc.
Definitely agree with these points. For me beautiful visuals certainly help. Story not being too predictable. Filmmaker makes a film out of passion for the subject rather than just because they are a famous filmmaker. Why is it soo many filmmakers who start out great produce terrible films later in their careers? Why do they lose their spark?
Great analysis. I think first of all a story worth telling, good actors, no plotholes, no fluff, no unnecessary scenes that add nothing, no political agenda, good music that doesnt have to play in ever scene, good lighting - not like the dark lighting modern movies choose, a limited dynamic range in sound that doesnt have me mixing the movie because the scenes with whispering vs explosions/gunshots are annoying, no cliches and no predictability, also copying stories from the 40/50s is boring, i want a original, nice cinematography, no shaky cameras or cutting the scenes every half a second, long shots are way more immersive, no „stupid“ character that behave without rational, a „chamber“ movie with limited scenes is way better than having the characters fly across half the world every 10 minutes in the movie as it adds nothing, scripts that let the actors speak in a natural way and not in a way that ruins the immersion because its so stilted, having attractive actors is a bonus - if all the rest of the cinematography is beautiful then so should the actors be - movies are watched for the visual pleasure. Explosions/effects and cgi mostly dont add anything to the story and have been seen many times - they add no excitement. And finaly an actual ending - open endings suck and are lazy screenwriting.
Sick video dude, I love your work! Keep it up dude, always strive ‼️‼️
I think what makes a movie great is if it makes you feel something or challenges you like makes you think of something in a new light. Usually that's what makes them classics or good movies because you remember how you felt when you watched it for the first time.
I love how this video starts with 'art is subjective' but continues to disprove that statement by explaining what makes good art!
You obviously don't have nuance as a person which makes you fit right in With the majority of the rest of today's population.
There are technical aspects of movies that are objective in quality.. Avengers endgame is objectively a better made film than 1990's Captain Annerica in just about every aspect.. From the film making to the acting... Disputing that would be just plain silly...
But, as an individual you might still enjoy that Captain America movie more than Avengers endgame.. And sometimes there is no real explanation as to why other than you just simply Enjoy that Captain America film better. For whatever reason it has more rewatchability for you..
And nobody has the ability or right to tell you you're wrong. . Because you're not wrong.
Because enjoyment of art is entirely and 100% subjective.
Despite there clearly being objectivity in the quality of each film from a technical filmmaking standpoint
@@InShaneMedia your argument starts of with a personal attack which is always a bad start, and then you convolute and add to what I said. I said art was objective, I never said people's enjoyment of art was objective. You need to read things before responding to them.
I think a great movie needs only one thing:
It has to be an absurd story, but it has to be believable somehow.
Ive watched hundreds of film, but my most favorite is Paranormal activity (the first). I know theres lots of better film, but PA gave the most influence on me. Simply because until this very second it made me couldn't sleep with lights off alone.
Great movie doesnt have to be well written and beautiful.
Like the new logo my man! 👌🏾
Amazing vid!
That's easy! A film's greatness is determined by how much I like it! That's it! A film's greatness is a matter of opinion.
While most people like therefore consider a flick like, say, "Pulp Fiction", great, there are some people who don't like it therefore think it's a terrible flick. But just because someone refuses to call "Pulp Fiction" a great film therefore doesn't like it, it doesn't mean that they should be bullied for speaking their mind against the general consensus.
There is no place for snobbery in art, cinema included. People should like whatever they want and classify things in anyway they want, too and should not be disrespected for doing so. I for one am getting extremely sick of cinematic dogma that goes around.
Again, "greatness" is different in each person's opinion, and, to me, it is inseparable from intense pleasure. There is absolutely no reason why I would call something "great" if I hate it. That would be self-deprecating and frankly self-contradictory. If I hate something or someone, they are bad to me. This also applies to film.
All movie opinions are subjective, what one person likes another person dislikes, no one is right or wrong about their opinions of certain movies, so if one person considers a movie a classic but another doesn't it does not mean either person is right or wrong it's all in the eye of the beholder.
Your argument is parly true.
That's like saying since some people like to rape, and some don't, no one is right in saying if rape is good or bad. I think like with most things in a democracy, the majority should own the credibility to create definitions, determine what is good and bad. Individuals can still have their beliefs but majority often times speaks the best truth we have available, you can't expect to innovate at all without considering majority opinion. This is to point out that the term subjective is useless, it serves no purpose but to just make you feel good about your decisions and beliefs as an individual.
@@SHDEdits But all movie opinions are subjective because it's up to the individual if they like or dislike a certain movie, I don't care if a movie get's praise by the majority if I don't personally like it doesn't mean I'm wrong it just doesn't speak to me and vice versa if the majority dislikes a movie and I like it doesn't mean I'm wrong again. It's all to do with personal tastes and what movie speaks to us and how much we enjoy a movie. Howard the Duck (1986) is mostly disliked by the majority but I love it, doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just speaks to me.
@@robertobuatti7226 You're basically saying that statistics have no way of validating the truth. Which isn't true.
@@SHDEdits Well are you right or wrong for liking or disliking a certain food. It's all to do with tastes, statistics are just numbers, it doesn't speak for the individual person.
"To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script." - Alfred Hitchcock
Love your stuff dude
I am form India and i want to become a script writer. But i started to watch world movies when i was 17 untill that i mainly watched local movies which were not too good. I started to think about script writing as a career only after watching some great international movies. Many people say that film making talent is inborn but i am not like that. So can i pursue my dream
There's no such thing as inborn talent, just work happily and passionately and you will see the results sooner or later. All the best.
@@srinivassridhar5151 Thanks bro♥
What do you think of RRR?
Great video, thanks
Gave me chills.
In India an item song in the club or selmon boy can make a movie hit
We’re talking bout great movies….not superhits
If you like it, its a great movie to you. We need to stop getting so caught up in what the masses think when it comes to “self” entertainment!
I loved this video, I also agree with all that was listed for a great film. I particularly think that an actor who’s got a full understanding and full Emerson into their character along with the precise direction form their filmmaker will take the film over the top and make it one of the greatest films made. This is, I believe in my humble opinion one of the key ingredients to making movie magic !
Love Roger Ebert headbombs :D
Absolutely no pressure to upcoming filmmakers...
They should feel way more pressure to produce quality. Increasing number of films nowadays have more to do with identity politics and other such nonsense than creative storytelling.
@@k0rppi259 That appears to be a common theme these days. How long will it last I don't know. I think it's great that filmmaking resources are more available to people, however this means a higher volume of garbage to sift through.
@@k0rppi259 Everyone says this but it is just not true that identity politics are taking over entertainment. Name me 5 movies that do. I'm sure you'll be able to, I'm just wondering what movies you'll name.
@@visualsforyou7120 I didn't say identity politics is taking over entertainment, I said the amount of it is increasing at the cost of quality storytelling. I'm sure there will never be a time when every movie is about social justice, but I am concerned about the trend. I'm hesitant to just produce a random list of movies, because I don't think you really understood what I was saying. I didn't mean to say that every movie nowadays is filled with SJW rhetoric, but the trend is towards that. The movie studios are more concerned about the political views of their writers, directors and actors than their skill in their profession and to me that is not a promising sign for the future. It doesn't matter how socially conscious writing staff you have if they can't produce quality entertainment or even tell a coherent story. I should clarify that I'm not against equality and all that, I just think filmmakers should concentrate on the actual movie and the story they want to tell, instead of thinking how they can make sure their cast and crew represents all the racial and sexual minorities of USA.
Look at Nomadland, Star Wars and the new 007 movie. None are that bad and none are exactly filled with the SJW message, but the driving force behind these movies was social justice, not storytelling and you can see that in the finished product. Look at Marvel superhero movies and all the numerous remakes of sci-fi and fantasy classics that are replacing beloved, established, well thought-out characters with soulless cardboard cutouts of actual people and feminist power fantasies. Look at Enola Holmes, completely pointless movie that would never have been made if not for the social justice movement fanning the flames of hatred and resentment toward anyone that's white, male and straight. What I'm concerned about is the message this sends, which is that you can attain success by signaling certain political views even if you have no skills at what you do. Do you honestly think this mindset doesn't translate into more progressive, yet less talented people being hired to make movies?
@k0rppi
My opinions on the movies you mentioned:
- I've never understood how people have seen anything relating to social justice in the new Star Wars movies. You have to seriously be looking out for it to find anything. What, Rey is a woman? I get that she's sort of a bland character and is basically a worse Luke Skywalker but her being female has nothing to do with that. Plenty of characters in the new Star Wars movies were underdeveloped and it's not like Star Wars has ever been a goldmine for amazing writing. A character being a woman while having insane amounts of power in a universe where characters have insane amounts of power doesn't imply there's some social justice undertones.
- I don't think Nomadland was ever meant to have a strict plot. You're saying social justice is what made it have less of a plot when it's pretty clear they were going for a more documentary-esque feel in the first place. Throughout the movie Fern just goes from job to job and meets random people and it's clear a more loose plot is what they were going for from a filmmaking standpoint. Nomadland is also supposed to be a much more real, thought-provoking movie than Star Wars or No Time to Die. Of course it was going to have commentary on the economy when it's main character is going through a financial crisis. To me its commentary did not detract from the movie whatsoever and it made _perfect_ sense for it to be there. It didn't feel pandering in any way either. Everything Fern said sounded like something Fern would genuinely believe.
- I don't see how there is anything relating to social justice in the new Bond either. What, there's a woman who can shoot a gun and is physically capable? Woooah, how insane that a character is able to do well in combat and be snarky in a _Bond_ movie. If it was a white man instead of a black woman who had the same personality shown in the trailers, literally no one would be complaining. The fact the new 007 is a black woman is not relevant at all yet everyone is still whining about it. I haven't seen the movie yet but I heard from a pretty known critic that James Bond even gets the title of 007 back. People seriously just spread a lie about the character replacing James Bond when there was no proof of it at all, and, surprise surpise, it ended up not happening. Also I just want to make sure, you've seen No Time to Die as of the time you said that, right? It's not out in some countries so I want to make sure.
This is also coming from a straight white male, the group apparently recieving so much hate from movies. In my opinion you have to be really sensitive to watch these movies and feel attacked in any way.
I think a great movie is when the story keeps moving along and the filmmaking doesn't look aged.
I watched asteroid city and i dont know how i feel about it
most watched channel preparing my second short film
great movies are rare at our days!!! to much special effects and less specialities from actors !!!
Squid Games
@@UnchartedWorlds Squid Game is a TV Show.
It has become obvious to me that people who say this just don't watch many movies. There are an abundance of special movies with outstanding filmmaking coming out _every_ year. You just have to look past some of the most popular movies since a lot can be pretty generic. Even then, we still get artistic blockbusters like this year's Dune.
Special effects are not a proof of a good or bad film. They are a tool to create a world. When they are used well, they can be astonishing and memorable for all the right reasons (Jurassic Park). When not they can be an overblown mess (Ready Player One).
Not a rarity though there's not a large amount like before. Also it depends on what kind of cinema you’re viewing. South Korea is one country that consistently produces quality cinema in these times.
Maybe it is authenticity.
art is not subjective - if it was no one could share it. it’s the universal not the particular.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Stories make the movies great.
Are you south african
Story and not having the technical side deter the audience from the story makes a great film.
Hey I have found your channel really helpful. But I find your plugs for your sponsors really annoying. Could you just put them at the very end of the video so we don't have to watch them?