I’m very enthusiastic about this topic. Furthermore, I’m also enjoying your sophisticated content. G’day and keep uploading more videos about contour integral.
As an engineer I see it in a different manner, In the integral of this product F(z). dz rotates then the answer is zero and if it does not then over one revolution the integral is a constant multiplied by 2 pi. If F(z) has many poles the say one being K/ (z-a) then the integrating around the pole a the product K dz/(z-a) does not rotate and it has a value while while going around point a all the other integrals will be insignificant, Then the procedure is repeated around pole, b and pole c where by the total summation is 2pi( summation of the residues) If the denominator 1/(z-a)^n is has n not equal to 1 then dz/ ( z-a) ^n rotates and the integral is zero, It is all a case of watching whether the integral rotates of whether it does not rotate. and it will be a linear integral related to the circumference of the circle,.
You: that's me ! (Be sure and also be relax, I didn't think it's Joker! 😀😀) When I watching your video, I just enjoyed (it's me🤓, when I'm watching your videos 🤓) Thank you so much
The concept and proof of the residue theory is trivial to understand It's difficult to execute. That's how I found your video. I think math people don't understand the difficulty for the rest of us. There isn't a direct line from proof -> execution for the majority of ppl
But how you get on how to calculate the residue? It's kind of magic this "definition" of the bik... Do you have any idea on how Cauchy figure it out that bik it's a residue and how it was calculated?
Extraordinary explanation. This video should be the first result When searching for residue theorem
Wow , perfect, neat, concise and very simply written. Non comment, awesome. Thanks a lot.
Very useful and concise presentation to proof the Cauchy Residue thrown utilizing Laurent series.
I’m very enthusiastic about this topic. Furthermore, I’m also enjoying your sophisticated content. G’day and keep uploading more videos about contour integral.
Great stuff. Complex analysis is crazy!!!
As an engineer I see it in a different manner,
In the integral of this product F(z). dz rotates then the answer is zero and if it does not then over one revolution the integral is a constant multiplied by 2 pi.
If F(z) has many poles the say one being
K/ (z-a) then the integrating around the pole a the product K dz/(z-a) does not rotate and it has a value while while going around point a all the other integrals will be insignificant,
Then the procedure is repeated around pole, b and pole c where by the total summation is
2pi( summation of the residues)
If the denominator 1/(z-a)^n is has n not equal to 1 then dz/ ( z-a) ^n rotates and the integral is zero,
It is all a case of watching whether the integral rotates of whether it does not rotate. and it will be a linear integral related to the circumference of the circle,.
You: that's me ! (Be sure and also be relax, I didn't think it's Joker! 😀😀)
When I watching your video, I just enjoyed (it's me🤓, when I'm watching your videos 🤓)
Thank you so much
The concept and proof of the residue theory is trivial to understand
It's difficult to execute. That's how I found your video. I think math people don't understand the difficulty for the rest of us. There isn't a direct line from proof -> execution for the majority of ppl
But how you get on how to calculate the residue? It's kind of magic this "definition" of the bik...
Do you have any idea on how Cauchy figure it out that bik it's a residue and how it was calculated?
Its the residue as its the only part of the Laurent series of f(z) left over after you integrate around the pole.
Great video 🙂
Hello Dear *QN³*
Please make a video about *Laurent Series* .
Thank you so much
❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥