This video is part of the University of Southampton, Southampton Education School, Digital Media Resources www.southampton.ac.uk/education www.southampton.ac.uk/~sesvideo/
Most helpful! Thank you! None of my supervisors have been this straightforward about such data analysis. Thank goodness for this sort of thing on TH-cam!
This video is absolutely excellent. Enormous use-value for example, for dissertation stage students/new researchers, and for those working with them. It's the first bit of educational material I'd have them watch/give them. And I think it would also be, looking back the most important one. It's the what's in it, the way you've ordered the video, the length, and the clear pace and delivery style. I'm so glad that I found this one, and thanks Dr. Schultz, I owe you one.
Your lovely accent keeps us 'mericans attentive, and you do not put irritating music behind your presentation. This is a GREAT presentation. Thank you.
you are an absolutely fantastic professor. your students should consider themselves lucky. im workin on my IRB protocol for a graduate psychological research proposal and these videos have been a life saver
thank you thank you Sir for the generosity of your spirit in sharing this video......it complements constant comparative method and theoretical sampling in grounded theory....my gratitude to you Sir........
Wow, i am ending my masters degree in social work, with the subject integration. I had lots of difficulties finding out how to analyse qualitative data. Although i read the book: "interview" by Steiner Kvale and Svend Brinkmann - it was to unstructured. Awesome learning, going to use this strategy (inductive). Thanks :)
Very informative and concise. Thank you Dr Schultz! Just for information, I transcribed fifteen interviews, of approximately twenty minutes duration, into Microsoft Excel. I parsed each quote into isolated specific constructs based on their underlying meaning. I then coded each line separately using your bottoms up method. It resulted in 350 individual separate lines and one hundred and seven separate codes. I maintained trace-ability from the original interviewee by adding an alpha-numeric identifier. Using excel allows me to filter, focus and sort the data easily. It also provides ease of analysis of original data. While the transcription process is manual and exhausting, it has the benefit of being exhaustive and complete. Thanks again for sharing.
Thank you for sharing your process! I created tables for each interviewee in Word with columns for passage summaries, codes, subthemes, and themes. Once I have completed all 10 tables, I'm going to copy and paste them into excel so that I can sort by themes and synthesize from there. It is tedious but I really feel like this is the exciting part of the doctoral study process!
Very precise and systematic. this has saved my considerable time and I was lucky to view the vedio before the analyses of my qualitative data for my master thesis.
Thanks much, Dr. Shulz! Your videos are very helpful esp for us beginners doing research. Hope you can refer a site or a link or a video for an actual example of interview papers / qualitative research...but your videos are already a big help. Your effort on summarizing key steps and principles to remember is truly appreciated. :) Again, thanks! AHA Moments 11/4/17 ( Analyzing Your Interview/ University of Southampton)
I've been trying to understand this on my own for about 3 years, I've finally found that I was doing wrong with my interviews: not even establishing what approach I'd be using! Some of my questions were based on a deductive approach, and some in an inductive approach! In the end, my potential customers were not understanding what I've been asking them! (I'm using this for market research and user experience research)
I found this very helpful, thank you! However, I'm finding myself not knowing whether to choose qualitative content analysis or thematic analysis. I've done interviews, and transcribed those. The thing is, the participants are all non-native Swedish speakers which makes it a "long journey" to get to the core of what they're trying to say. This makes me think I should use thematic analysis. Does anyone have an idea? And for me it wasn't quite clear which of these two methods were described in this video?
One step missing in this hybrid approach seems to be deciphering the sub themes. When you start with themes from theory, I think it makes sense to - based on quotes within the themes - find sub themes that seem to matter for your research questions.
Good video. But can anyone tell me why you compare new themes to old themes? Like, what is the purpose of that? To ensure there is no redundancy or do you get rid of old themes? Thank you. I'm very new to this topic.
I am looking for someone who is professional in discourse analysis, if there is, can I keep in touch with him/her please. I need to help very necessary
Most helpful! Thank you! None of my supervisors have been this straightforward about such data analysis. Thank goodness for this sort of thing on TH-cam!
Seriously!
Than you Prof. Schulz. This was really helpful. It is like squeezing a whole book in an 11-minute video.
This video is absolutely excellent. Enormous use-value for example, for dissertation stage students/new researchers, and for those working with them. It's the first bit of educational material I'd have them watch/give them. And I think it would also be, looking back the most important one. It's the what's in it, the way you've ordered the video, the length, and the clear pace and delivery style. I'm so glad that I found this one, and thanks Dr. Schultz, I owe you one.
Your lovely accent keeps us 'mericans attentive, and you do not put irritating music behind your presentation. This is a GREAT presentation. Thank you.
Dr. John, thank you so much for your presentation; it's really helpful.
you are an absolutely fantastic professor. your students should consider themselves lucky. im workin on my IRB protocol for a graduate psychological research proposal and these videos have been a life saver
Thank you so much for this video. I have been struggling analyzing my data for my PhD thesis and this video was very helpful.
This video is incredibly helpful and accessible to me as a beginner, thank you very much.
thank you thank you Sir for the generosity of your spirit in sharing this video......it complements constant comparative method and theoretical sampling in grounded theory....my gratitude to you Sir........
Wow, i am ending my masters degree in social work, with the subject integration. I had lots of difficulties finding out how to analyse qualitative data. Although i read the book: "interview" by Steiner Kvale and Svend Brinkmann - it was to unstructured. Awesome learning, going to use this strategy (inductive). Thanks :)
Very informative and concise. Thank you Dr Schultz! Just for information, I transcribed fifteen interviews, of approximately twenty minutes duration, into Microsoft Excel. I parsed each quote into isolated specific constructs based on their underlying meaning. I then coded each line separately using your bottoms up method. It resulted in 350 individual separate lines and one hundred and seven separate codes. I maintained trace-ability from the original interviewee by adding an alpha-numeric identifier. Using excel allows me to filter, focus and sort the data easily. It also provides ease of analysis of original data. While the transcription process is manual and exhausting, it has the benefit of being exhaustive and complete. Thanks again for sharing.
Thank you for sharing your process! I created tables for each interviewee in Word with columns for passage summaries, codes, subthemes, and themes. Once I have completed all 10 tables, I'm going to copy and paste them into excel so that I can sort by themes and synthesize from there. It is tedious but I really feel like this is the exciting part of the doctoral study process!
This has been tremendously helpful for my chapter 4! Thank you for a quick, yet substantial lesson!
Thank you for that. Very handy for my own research. Nice to have a qual analysis 101!
Thank you Dr Schulz! What a great, well-paced, and concise video- so helpful for writing my interview-based dissertation!
Very precise and systematic. this has saved my considerable time and I was lucky to view the vedio before the analyses of my qualitative data for my master thesis.
Thank you so much, I was in a mess before I watch this video
Thank you. I very much appreciate this. It is so clear and helpful.
Excellent, got some good ideas for summarising data analysis - thanks.
This tutorials is very good and i will recommend it to all who needs help. thank very much God bless you
Excellent! Clear, easy to understand! Many thanks.
Thanks much, Dr. Shulz! Your videos are very helpful esp for us beginners doing research. Hope you can refer a site or a link or a video for an actual example of interview papers / qualitative research...but your videos are already a big help. Your effort on summarizing key steps and principles to remember is truly appreciated. :) Again, thanks! AHA Moments 11/4/17 ( Analyzing Your Interview/ University of Southampton)
it has really helped me in understanding what is involved in content analysis. Thanks for the lecturer
Thank you for the amazing and informative lecture.
This has been very helpful. Much appreciated
Thanks very clear and concise instruction.
This was incredibly helpful and clear. Thank you for posting.
This was awesome Dr. It helped me a lot. Well done.
Well explanation, great professor
Excellent. Thank you!
Agree you guide us step by step slowly and clearly. Thank you for understanding us.
Amazingly helpful! Thank you :)
Thank you very much for the so many good ideas!
Thank you for your thoughts, This is really helpful.
Most helpful video ever. Thank you so so much!
Thank you for this clear explanation.
Thank you, very clear explanation!
Thank you so much for such an informative video.
I've been trying to understand this on my own for about 3 years, I've finally found that I was doing wrong with my interviews: not even establishing what approach I'd be using! Some of my questions were based on a deductive approach, and some in an inductive approach! In the end, my potential customers were not understanding what I've been asking them! (I'm using this for market research and user experience research)
Thank You very much Dr. Schulz.
I found this really helpful, thank you.
amazing i will use it in my disertation and i will cite you and your website, thank you very much
This is very helpful. Thank you so much
Great information
You just really helped me...thank you!
Thank you ... clearly articulated...
Thank you. Very well explained.
I like your videos , simple and easy to understand. Please can you do a video on panel data analysis?
Extremely helpful!
Excellent. Thank you very much.
Very useful, thank you for this video, from the very long-distance (Laos).
The video is good and helpful. Thanks
Very helpful for me, thank you so much
Fantastic, thank you!
thank you for your brief lecture
Outstanding. Thank you
Here I found a nice strategy to analyse qualitative data
Thank you very much for the video.
A really useful video.
Interesting thanks so much prof.
I found this very helpful, thank you! However, I'm finding myself not knowing whether to choose qualitative content analysis or thematic analysis. I've done interviews, and transcribed those. The thing is, the participants are all non-native Swedish speakers which makes it a "long journey" to get to the core of what they're trying to say. This makes me think I should use thematic analysis. Does anyone have an idea?
And for me it wasn't quite clear which of these two methods were described in this video?
Yes very helpful! thank you
If you have interviewees from different categories like teachers, students and parents should you anaylse their interviews together or separately?
Thank you that was brilliant
put the speed at 1.25x it helps
very helpful, thank you
Thank you!
great and very useful thanks
great, many thanks. Is there any publication of Dr. Schultz to cite this in the paper?
very helpful, thank you
I agree with the other comments, thank you so much for this very helpful video. Just one thing, Stage 5 of deductive/inductive approach is missing
One step missing in this hybrid approach seems to be deciphering the sub themes. When you start with themes from theory, I think it makes sense to - based on quotes within the themes - find sub themes that seem to matter for your research questions.
Much appreciated
Awesome!
what happened to stage 5 of the deductive strategy?
Good video. But can anyone tell me why you compare new themes to old themes? Like, what is the purpose of that? To ensure there is no redundancy or do you get rid of old themes? Thank you. I'm very new to this topic.
very useful for my dissertation
VERY HELPFUL
awesome thanks
excellent.
very useful
*commonalities 1:29? In anycase a really useful video!
Do you code each interview separately or do you code each response for a question for all participants together?
Great question? Did you ever find an answer elsewhere?
MMMC Nope but I coded each interview separately for my thesis
sub-codes equals to sub-themes?
nyc lecture
I am looking for someone who is professional in discourse analysis, if there is, can I keep in touch with him/her please. I need to help very necessary
I dont know why inductive seemed the same as deductive to me
Amazing video, but you skipped stage 5 in the combination approach.
Did I miss stage 5 to stage 6?