Most helpful! Thank you! None of my supervisors have been this straightforward about such data analysis. Thank goodness for this sort of thing on TH-cam!
This video is absolutely excellent. Enormous use-value for example, for dissertation stage students/new researchers, and for those working with them. It's the first bit of educational material I'd have them watch/give them. And I think it would also be, looking back the most important one. It's the what's in it, the way you've ordered the video, the length, and the clear pace and delivery style. I'm so glad that I found this one, and thanks Dr. Schultz, I owe you one.
Your lovely accent keeps us 'mericans attentive, and you do not put irritating music behind your presentation. This is a GREAT presentation. Thank you.
Very informative and concise. Thank you Dr Schultz! Just for information, I transcribed fifteen interviews, of approximately twenty minutes duration, into Microsoft Excel. I parsed each quote into isolated specific constructs based on their underlying meaning. I then coded each line separately using your bottoms up method. It resulted in 350 individual separate lines and one hundred and seven separate codes. I maintained trace-ability from the original interviewee by adding an alpha-numeric identifier. Using excel allows me to filter, focus and sort the data easily. It also provides ease of analysis of original data. While the transcription process is manual and exhausting, it has the benefit of being exhaustive and complete. Thanks again for sharing.
Thank you for sharing your process! I created tables for each interviewee in Word with columns for passage summaries, codes, subthemes, and themes. Once I have completed all 10 tables, I'm going to copy and paste them into excel so that I can sort by themes and synthesize from there. It is tedious but I really feel like this is the exciting part of the doctoral study process!
you are an absolutely fantastic professor. your students should consider themselves lucky. im workin on my IRB protocol for a graduate psychological research proposal and these videos have been a life saver
thank you thank you Sir for the generosity of your spirit in sharing this video......it complements constant comparative method and theoretical sampling in grounded theory....my gratitude to you Sir........
Wow, i am ending my masters degree in social work, with the subject integration. I had lots of difficulties finding out how to analyse qualitative data. Although i read the book: "interview" by Steiner Kvale and Svend Brinkmann - it was to unstructured. Awesome learning, going to use this strategy (inductive). Thanks :)
Very precise and systematic. this has saved my considerable time and I was lucky to view the vedio before the analyses of my qualitative data for my master thesis.
One step missing in this hybrid approach seems to be deciphering the sub themes. When you start with themes from theory, I think it makes sense to - based on quotes within the themes - find sub themes that seem to matter for your research questions.
Thanks much, Dr. Shulz! Your videos are very helpful esp for us beginners doing research. Hope you can refer a site or a link or a video for an actual example of interview papers / qualitative research...but your videos are already a big help. Your effort on summarizing key steps and principles to remember is truly appreciated. :) Again, thanks! AHA Moments 11/4/17 ( Analyzing Your Interview/ University of Southampton)
I've been trying to understand this on my own for about 3 years, I've finally found that I was doing wrong with my interviews: not even establishing what approach I'd be using! Some of my questions were based on a deductive approach, and some in an inductive approach! In the end, my potential customers were not understanding what I've been asking them! (I'm using this for market research and user experience research)
Good video. But can anyone tell me why you compare new themes to old themes? Like, what is the purpose of that? To ensure there is no redundancy or do you get rid of old themes? Thank you. I'm very new to this topic.
I found this very helpful, thank you! However, I'm finding myself not knowing whether to choose qualitative content analysis or thematic analysis. I've done interviews, and transcribed those. The thing is, the participants are all non-native Swedish speakers which makes it a "long journey" to get to the core of what they're trying to say. This makes me think I should use thematic analysis. Does anyone have an idea? And for me it wasn't quite clear which of these two methods were described in this video?
I am looking for someone who is professional in discourse analysis, if there is, can I keep in touch with him/her please. I need to help very necessary
Most helpful! Thank you! None of my supervisors have been this straightforward about such data analysis. Thank goodness for this sort of thing on TH-cam!
Seriously!
This video is absolutely excellent. Enormous use-value for example, for dissertation stage students/new researchers, and for those working with them. It's the first bit of educational material I'd have them watch/give them. And I think it would also be, looking back the most important one. It's the what's in it, the way you've ordered the video, the length, and the clear pace and delivery style. I'm so glad that I found this one, and thanks Dr. Schultz, I owe you one.
Your lovely accent keeps us 'mericans attentive, and you do not put irritating music behind your presentation. This is a GREAT presentation. Thank you.
Than you Prof. Schulz. This was really helpful. It is like squeezing a whole book in an 11-minute video.
Very informative and concise. Thank you Dr Schultz! Just for information, I transcribed fifteen interviews, of approximately twenty minutes duration, into Microsoft Excel. I parsed each quote into isolated specific constructs based on their underlying meaning. I then coded each line separately using your bottoms up method. It resulted in 350 individual separate lines and one hundred and seven separate codes. I maintained trace-ability from the original interviewee by adding an alpha-numeric identifier. Using excel allows me to filter, focus and sort the data easily. It also provides ease of analysis of original data. While the transcription process is manual and exhausting, it has the benefit of being exhaustive and complete. Thanks again for sharing.
Thank you for sharing your process! I created tables for each interviewee in Word with columns for passage summaries, codes, subthemes, and themes. Once I have completed all 10 tables, I'm going to copy and paste them into excel so that I can sort by themes and synthesize from there. It is tedious but I really feel like this is the exciting part of the doctoral study process!
Dr. John, thank you so much for your presentation; it's really helpful.
you are an absolutely fantastic professor. your students should consider themselves lucky. im workin on my IRB protocol for a graduate psychological research proposal and these videos have been a life saver
thank you thank you Sir for the generosity of your spirit in sharing this video......it complements constant comparative method and theoretical sampling in grounded theory....my gratitude to you Sir........
Wow, i am ending my masters degree in social work, with the subject integration. I had lots of difficulties finding out how to analyse qualitative data. Although i read the book: "interview" by Steiner Kvale and Svend Brinkmann - it was to unstructured. Awesome learning, going to use this strategy (inductive). Thanks :)
Thank you so much for this video. I have been struggling analyzing my data for my PhD thesis and this video was very helpful.
Very precise and systematic. this has saved my considerable time and I was lucky to view the vedio before the analyses of my qualitative data for my master thesis.
This video is incredibly helpful and accessible to me as a beginner, thank you very much.
Thank you for that. Very handy for my own research. Nice to have a qual analysis 101!
This has been tremendously helpful for my chapter 4! Thank you for a quick, yet substantial lesson!
Excellent, got some good ideas for summarising data analysis - thanks.
Thank you Dr Schulz! What a great, well-paced, and concise video- so helpful for writing my interview-based dissertation!
Excellent! Clear, easy to understand! Many thanks.
Thanks very clear and concise instruction.
Agree you guide us step by step slowly and clearly. Thank you for understanding us.
Thank you so much, I was in a mess before I watch this video
This tutorials is very good and i will recommend it to all who needs help. thank very much God bless you
I like your videos , simple and easy to understand. Please can you do a video on panel data analysis?
Thank you for the amazing and informative lecture.
it has really helped me in understanding what is involved in content analysis. Thanks for the lecturer
Thank you. I very much appreciate this. It is so clear and helpful.
I agree with the other comments, thank you so much for this very helpful video. Just one thing, Stage 5 of deductive/inductive approach is missing
One step missing in this hybrid approach seems to be deciphering the sub themes. When you start with themes from theory, I think it makes sense to - based on quotes within the themes - find sub themes that seem to matter for your research questions.
Well explanation, great professor
Thanks much, Dr. Shulz! Your videos are very helpful esp for us beginners doing research. Hope you can refer a site or a link or a video for an actual example of interview papers / qualitative research...but your videos are already a big help. Your effort on summarizing key steps and principles to remember is truly appreciated. :) Again, thanks! AHA Moments 11/4/17 ( Analyzing Your Interview/ University of Southampton)
This has been very helpful. Much appreciated
Excellent. Thank you!
This was awesome Dr. It helped me a lot. Well done.
great, many thanks. Is there any publication of Dr. Schultz to cite this in the paper?
Great information
Thank you very much for the so many good ideas!
Most helpful video ever. Thank you so so much!
amazing i will use it in my disertation and i will cite you and your website, thank you very much
Thank you so much for such an informative video.
I've been trying to understand this on my own for about 3 years, I've finally found that I was doing wrong with my interviews: not even establishing what approach I'd be using! Some of my questions were based on a deductive approach, and some in an inductive approach! In the end, my potential customers were not understanding what I've been asking them! (I'm using this for market research and user experience research)
Cracking video!
This was incredibly helpful and clear. Thank you for posting.
Thank you!
Do you code each interview separately or do you code each response for a question for all participants together?
Great question? Did you ever find an answer elsewhere?
MMMC Nope but I coded each interview separately for my thesis
Extremely helpful!
Thank you for this clear explanation.
Thank you. Very well explained.
Outstanding. Thank you
Here I found a nice strategy to analyse qualitative data
Thank you for your thoughts, This is really helpful.
what happened to stage 5 of the deductive strategy?
Thank You very much Dr. Schulz.
Good video. But can anyone tell me why you compare new themes to old themes? Like, what is the purpose of that? To ensure there is no redundancy or do you get rid of old themes? Thank you. I'm very new to this topic.
Much appreciated
Thank you ... clearly articulated...
Thank you, very clear explanation!
thank you for your brief lecture
Fantastic, thank you!
Very helpful for me, thank you so much
This is very helpful. Thank you so much
The video is good and helpful. Thanks
Very useful, thank you for this video, from the very long-distance (Laos).
Thank you very much for the video.
Interesting thanks so much prof.
If you have interviewees from different categories like teachers, students and parents should you anaylse their interviews together or separately?
You just really helped me...thank you!
great and very useful thanks
I found this really helpful, thank you.
excellent.
Awesome!
A really useful video.
sub-codes equals to sub-themes?
Did I miss stage 5 to stage 6?
I found this very helpful, thank you! However, I'm finding myself not knowing whether to choose qualitative content analysis or thematic analysis. I've done interviews, and transcribed those. The thing is, the participants are all non-native Swedish speakers which makes it a "long journey" to get to the core of what they're trying to say. This makes me think I should use thematic analysis. Does anyone have an idea?
And for me it wasn't quite clear which of these two methods were described in this video?
VERY HELPFUL
Yes very helpful! thank you
Thank you that was brilliant
very helpful, thank you
very helpful, thank you
very useful for my dissertation
put the speed at 1.25x it helps
*commonalities 1:29? In anycase a really useful video!
very useful
I am looking for someone who is professional in discourse analysis, if there is, can I keep in touch with him/her please. I need to help very necessary
nyc lecture
Amazing video, but you skipped stage 5 in the combination approach.
Excellent. Thank you very much.