Hi,Sravanthi Thank You for Your Comment !!! Keep Support Our Channel !!!! Thank you so much for visiting our channel , Your comment will help us to provide better content for our subscribers👍. Please don't forget to Subscribe our channel, hit bell icon 🔔 for more Knowledgeable Updates. If you are looking for a fresher's Job | Gap after education looking for an IT Job | Looking for a Good Package Job in IT then Harsha Trainings is Right Place. 🤙Talk to our Experts to get Complete Details : +91-9652532753 | +91-9885312299 | +91-8121092753
Hi Thanks for explaining in detail with example. But i have 1 question - what will be the relation between spinoff shape and locking on parent and child case. If i have use spinoff shape in parent case, then how child case behaves. which type of locking it will have. Ex - 2 user are working, User1 on parent case and User2 in child case.
In a scenario where two users, User1 and User2, are simultaneously working on a parent case and its spinoff (child) case respectively, the behavior regarding locking depends on the specific implementation of the case management system. Here are some possibilities: 1. **Independent Locking**: The parent and child cases have independent locking mechanisms. This means that User1 can lock the parent case for editing, while User2 can lock the child case separately. Each user can work on their respective cases without interfering with each other's changes. 2. **Lock Inheritance**: The child case inherits the locking status from the parent case. If User1 locks the parent case for editing, the child case automatically becomes locked as well. This prevents User2 from making changes to the child case while User1 is editing the parent case. 3. **Partial Locking**: The system allows concurrent editing of certain parts of the parent and child cases while preventing conflicting changes. For example, User1 may be editing one section of the parent case, while User2 edits a different section of the child case. However, if User1 and User2 attempt to edit the same section simultaneously, the system may implement a locking mechanism to prevent conflicts. 4. **No Locking**: The system might not enforce any locking at all, allowing both User1 and User2 to make changes to their respective cases simultaneously without restrictions. However, this approach can potentially lead to conflicts if both users modify the same data concurrently. The specific locking mechanism implemented would depend on factors such as the requirements of the system, the desired level of concurrency, and considerations for data consistency and integrity. It's essential for the case management system to handle locking in a way that prevents data corruption or loss due to concurrent edits by multiple users.
Hi Shivam, We can cheive Parallel processing by using parent and child cases. For your information split join or splin off or slipt foreach, none of these are parallel processing at all... Harsha Trainings is one of the leading and Placement Consultant Provided training with qualified trainers on PEGA,DEVOPS, PowerBI,JAVA,DATA SCIENCE, MULESOFT ,Spring&Microservices,OracleFinance,Appian,Core&Advance java,Django,Communication&Varbal and other various leading software technologies…. For those who have gap after education, we have job placement assurance courses... Subscribe to our channel to learn best of best in technology... For training call us on 9652532753, 9885312299
@@HarshaTrainingsacademy There is a process flow with few assignments and a Subprocess in between with Spinoff enabled. Inside the subprocess we have an assignment which is assigned to Operator 2. The main process assignment is assigned to Operator 1. If both operators try to open the case at the same time. What will happen? (The case has default locking enabled.)
Finally waiting for this Topic from a longtime
You're very welcome!
What is the answer for twitter question.. whether two operators can try to work on two different assignments at a time?
Hi,Sravanthi Thank You for Your Comment !!! Keep Support Our Channel !!!!
Thank you so much for visiting our channel , Your comment will help us to provide better content for our subscribers👍.
Please don't forget to Subscribe our channel, hit bell icon 🔔 for more Knowledgeable Updates. If you are looking for a fresher's Job | Gap after education looking for an IT Job | Looking for a Good Package Job in IT then Harsha Trainings is Right Place. 🤙Talk to our Experts to get Complete Details : +91-9652532753 | +91-9885312299 | +91-8121092753
Hi Thanks for explaining in detail with example.
But i have 1 question - what will be the relation between spinoff shape and locking on parent and child case.
If i have use spinoff shape in parent case, then how child case behaves. which type of locking it will have.
Ex - 2 user are working, User1 on parent case and User2 in child case.
In a scenario where two users, User1 and User2, are simultaneously working on a parent case and its spinoff (child) case respectively, the behavior regarding locking depends on the specific implementation of the case management system. Here are some possibilities:
1. **Independent Locking**: The parent and child cases have independent locking mechanisms. This means that User1 can lock the parent case for editing, while User2 can lock the child case separately. Each user can work on their respective cases without interfering with each other's changes.
2. **Lock Inheritance**: The child case inherits the locking status from the parent case. If User1 locks the parent case for editing, the child case automatically becomes locked as well. This prevents User2 from making changes to the child case while User1 is editing the parent case.
3. **Partial Locking**: The system allows concurrent editing of certain parts of the parent and child cases while preventing conflicting changes. For example, User1 may be editing one section of the parent case, while User2 edits a different section of the child case. However, if User1 and User2 attempt to edit the same section simultaneously, the system may implement a locking mechanism to prevent conflicts.
4. **No Locking**: The system might not enforce any locking at all, allowing both User1 and User2 to make changes to their respective cases simultaneously without restrictions. However, this approach can potentially lead to conflicts if both users modify the same data concurrently.
The specific locking mechanism implemented would depend on factors such as the requirements of the system, the desired level of concurrency, and considerations for data consistency and integrity. It's essential for the case management system to handle locking in a way that prevents data corruption or loss due to concurrent edits by multiple users.
Will split joins be synchronous then?
Yes Synchronous
How we can achieve the functionality of parallel process with out using split, split for each and spin off -this is the interview question
Hi Shivam, We can cheive Parallel processing by using parent and child cases. For your information split join or splin off or slipt foreach, none of these are parallel processing at all...
Harsha Trainings is one of the leading and Placement Consultant Provided training with qualified trainers on PEGA,DEVOPS, PowerBI,JAVA,DATA SCIENCE, MULESOFT ,Spring&Microservices,OracleFinance,Appian,Core&Advance java,Django,Communication&Varbal and other various leading software technologies….
For those who have gap after education, we have job placement assurance courses...
Subscribe to our channel to learn best of best in technology... For training call us on 9652532753, 9885312299
What is the answer of the twitter question? I got that question in an interview.
Please reply.
Could you please post the question here,,, i do not remeber
@@HarshaTrainingsacademy There is a process flow with few assignments and a Subprocess in between with Spinoff enabled. Inside the subprocess we have an assignment which is assigned to Operator 2. The main process assignment is assigned to Operator 1.
If both operators try to open the case at the same time. What will happen? (The case has default locking enabled.)
@@RohanKumar-km8oq Did you found the answer to above question?
As per my understanding if operator 1 has already opened it, operator 2 won't be able to open it. As single WO is getting routed to operator 2
@@HarshaTrainingsacademyCan you please help us with the answer