Eternal President Kim il Sung bare In mind that the comment was 4 years ago , the article you read and the quick effective resources available on this topic now were most likely not available to him 😌
I had one of the best grades of my class in a test that i was unable to watch any lesson In nine minutes i learned more than in hours of my teacher My approval in moderm macroeconomics II, as well as my mental healthy in this semester I own to you THANK YOU RANDON INDIAN GUY IN TH-cam If someday you ended in Uberlandia-Brazil, remember me to pay a coffe to you
Omg you are so amazing! Your videos are so useful to me & I really cannot emphasise enough of how happy I am that you have uploaded this video. My exams are in two months on global economy & I've been using your video since November 2014. You're the best!
Ngl, i didnt understand the relationships of the actual topic till 8:00 and then in last minute everythinggg started making sense! THANKYOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR VIDEOS THEY ARE A LIFESAVER DAL!!!
I have been watching your videos for the past 2 years. I am so thankful for the content that you've put here. Thanks a lot. You make economics lovable and easy to understand. Really can't thank you enough 🙏🏻
If the PED of imports was 0.6 and PED of exports was 0.6 then that adds to more than 1 so the devaluation should work but both are inelastic so surely the deficit would worsen?
My problem with this theory is that if PED(x) and PED(m) are, say, 0.6 (i.e both inelastic), total elasticity in that equation is greater than 1. What happens in this case?
the sum of two elasticities has to be greater than 1 if so the elasticity of net elasticity of demand will be elastic and TR will increase. So if independently both elasticities are less than one but add up to be more than one, then the next elasticity of exports and imports, i.e. X-M, is going to be elastic.
Hopefully you can get back to me, You mention the SUM of exports and imports and then go on to say NET EXPORTS - that is the subtraction of import expenditure from export revenue. That is a contradiction, I'm slightly confused on that. I would really appreciate an explanation of this. Thanks
I'd like to understand how the depreciation of the domestic currency can cause total revenue to fall. While its easy for me to understand that with inelastic demand a falling price results in falling revenue, when that falling price is the result of a depreciating currency, how does that effect the revenue received by the domestic producer? They are still asking the same price in their currency, are they not? Just a little unclear
+Brian Gibson The price charged will remain the same yes but if foreign currency is collected which then needs to be converted, less will be earned in terms of revenue. This is very common in the real world
+EconplusDal Thanks for responding. I was under the impression that the foreign party that is purchasing the goods is actually converting their currency to our currency then purchases it for the quoted price in the domestic currency. I thought this would actually increase revenue because the price to foreign firms falls increasing their demand, while my price is unchanged in my currency. My train of thought is summarized by saying if I sell a product for 5 dollars and collect 10 units of foreign currency which equals 5 dollars, I've still made 5 dollars. Then the dollar weakens and I sell the same product for 5 dollars, collect 8 units of foreign currency (which now now equals $5) I have still made 5 dollars. Sorry for the length of this.reply. Where am I going wrong? Do you have any videos that might address this?
+Brian Gibson In your example, if the $ weakens and you continue to charge $5 in a foreign currency, the relative price of your good will decrease. Therefore, you may sell a greater quantity of your good (as a fall in price leads to an extension in demand) and increase your revenue.
The depreciating domestic currency cause a reduction in the net price of a domestic product in the foreign market. However due to inelastic net exports, the net reduction in price leads to a reduction in revenue earned in export markets.
Isn't it unrealistic for the J curve to come through the x-axis and go into surplus in that period of time? Surely a weaker currency alone would not be enough to cure the problem of a current account deficit regardless of how long it takes?
Ardi Janjeva Depends on the country and how important the exchange rate is in determining its trade position. Sure there are lots of other factors that could also do it, but for some countries a weaker currency on its own can well rectify a current account deficit particularly if it was a strong currency that led to it in the first place
***** I see. Are there any countries that you could use as examples to prove that this can be the case, where the economy is heavily reliant on exchange rates determining the structure of the economy as a whole?
Ardi Janjeva Japan is a very good example, China too. Japan has experienced the J curve effect in recent times - the best recent example I can give you
Surely if ped for exports < 1 and ped for imports < 1, the deficit will widen, even if the sum is greater than 1. Export revenues will fall as the % increase in volumes is lower than % fall in price. likewise import expenditure will increase as the rise in price is greater than the fall in volumes. Do the maths. What am I missing?
export revenue never falls. as the money is converted back into the currency, export revenue will always rise. The condition holds if the export revenue grows higher than the increase in import expenditure. Sorry for such a late reply, I'm sure you've mastered it over the last 3 years!
legend. i learnt these two concepts in 9 minutes with you and couldn't learn them in 9 months with a teacher at school.
Eternal President Kim il Sung bare In mind that the comment was 4 years ago , the article you read and the quick effective resources available on this topic now were most likely not available to him 😌
@@TMIKEZY 7 now…yikes. Time flies
@@EternalShadow1667 8 now
😂😂
@@elimoore6591 9 now and just done 2024 paper 1
I had one of the best grades of my class in a test that i was unable to watch any lesson
In nine minutes i learned more than in hours of my teacher
My approval in moderm macroeconomics II, as well as my mental healthy in this semester I own to you
THANK YOU RANDON INDIAN GUY IN TH-cam
If someday you ended in Uberlandia-Brazil, remember me to pay a coffe to you
You could offer beer at least :p
Aah why couldn't you have been my teacher... you're great at explaining things.
Omg you are so amazing! Your videos are so useful to me & I really cannot emphasise enough of how happy I am that you have uploaded this video. My exams are in two months on global economy & I've been using your video since November 2014. You're the best!
This is a brilliant video! Very concise, great teaching.
Ngl, i didnt understand the relationships of the actual topic till 8:00 and then in last minute everythinggg started making sense! THANKYOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR VIDEOS THEY ARE A LIFESAVER DAL!!!
Thanks again - for simplifying concepts nicely!
Wanted to give my regards, thank you so much, I am a university student learning these concepts and you simplified the concept so well! Thumbs up:)!
Thank you Sir, you made it more comprehensive.
I have my As level exams tomorrow and I was still confused sigh,THANK YOUUUUU❤️❤️
I have been watching your videos for the past 2 years. I am so thankful for the content that you've put here. Thanks a lot.
You make economics lovable and easy to understand. Really can't thank you enough 🙏🏻
Very well explained. Thanks!
Thank you my boy, helping with the economics part of the CFA curriculum!!
best video on the channel. hands down.
great explanation, great video!
you are saving my life right now
Dude, thank you. This helped so much!
Very well explained thank you so much
Amazing! God bless you!
This guy is an absolute master
Great help, thanks!
Amazing video. Thanks.
You're amazing!
Thanks for this !
You're incredible
A question. How to derive the Marshall Lerner condition for improving the trade balance through devaluation?
I paid $400 for my cfa prep and you explained it better
Just want to say thanks!
Best explanation ❤️
My economics exam is tmr and I'm watching this the night before ... Thanks by the way, your video helped me a lot @EconplusDal
+Denon Merlo How did it go? IB?
+Jeffrey Li It wasn't that bad, Marshall Lerner condition didn't come up tho xD
@@AvrilSk8erboi27 got my exam tomm. I just hope this comes up for me :D
same g
@@samuela775 Lol, that was 7 yrs ago man. I've finished both highschool and college. Currently working now, time really does fly.
Learnt it very well from the video and Salvatore got me all confused with its matter
you're a saint
If the PED of imports was 0.6 and PED of exports was 0.6 then that adds to more than 1 so the devaluation should work but both are inelastic so surely the deficit would worsen?
No it wont but the rate at which it improves is slower.In the mean time unemployment and inflationary pressure would worsen the countrys situation
this guy is why i love economics!
thank you so much!
this man is my hero.
last minute exchange rate revision?
th-cam.com/video/CU4g581MaOU/w-d-xo.html
Here is a loop of the 'oh, yes meme'
how does the price go down in net exports?
You're amazing
Great video
Any chance of you doing some labour economics stuff?
mate you saved my ass, well explained video
You are a savior😍
legand thank you so much helped me out so much
Youre a legend
I love you sir!
Thank you so much
man i love you
I'm getting an A because of you
My problem with this theory is that if PED(x) and PED(m) are, say, 0.6 (i.e both inelastic), total elasticity in that equation is greater than 1. What happens in this case?
the sum of two elasticities has to be greater than 1 if so the elasticity of net elasticity of demand will be elastic and TR will increase.
So if independently both elasticities are less than one but add up to be more than one, then the next elasticity of exports and imports, i.e. X-M, is going to be elastic.
THANK YOU!!!
Amazing
legend
Hannah El Sabbagh o
Is this equation ignoring the negative sign of PEDx and PEDm?
Love you xx
Nice
thanks!!!!
i love you bro
Great work man, so great that it might save my as$ tomorrow
how about the graph for appreciation？？？？？
Dal The Man!
holy legend
Goat
can you please make Econ for uni videos
PLEASE
To show the J curve for the UK the curve should always be below the time axis. Think like an economist! ;)
Because we are always in a deficit😉
Hopefully you can get back to me, You mention the SUM of exports and imports and then go on to say NET EXPORTS - that is the subtraction of import expenditure from export revenue. That is a contradiction, I'm slightly confused on that.
I would really appreciate an explanation of this. Thanks
Joshua Klinger It is the sum of the elasticities that determines the final effect on net exports. This may clear it up
what if the elasticity of net exports is unitly elastic?
No effect on current account deficit
Thank you Rishi Sunak!
low key econplusdal is kinda hot
I'd like to understand how the depreciation of the domestic currency can cause total revenue to fall. While its easy for me to understand that with inelastic demand a falling price results in falling revenue, when that falling price is the result of a depreciating currency, how does that effect the revenue received by the domestic producer? They are still asking the same price in their currency, are they not? Just a little unclear
+Brian Gibson The price charged will remain the same yes but if foreign currency is collected which then needs to be converted, less will be earned in terms of revenue. This is very common in the real world
+EconplusDal Thanks for responding. I was under the impression that the foreign party that is purchasing the goods is actually converting their currency to our currency then purchases it for the quoted price in the domestic currency. I thought this would actually increase revenue because the price to foreign firms falls increasing their demand, while my price is unchanged in my currency. My train of thought is summarized by saying if I sell a product for 5 dollars and collect 10 units of foreign currency which equals 5 dollars, I've still made 5 dollars. Then the dollar weakens and I sell the same product for 5 dollars, collect 8 units of foreign currency (which now now equals $5) I have still made 5 dollars. Sorry for the length of this.reply. Where am I going wrong? Do you have any videos that might address this?
+Brian Gibson In your example, if the $ weakens and you continue to charge $5 in a foreign currency, the relative price of your good will decrease. Therefore, you may sell a greater quantity of your good (as a fall in price leads to an extension in demand) and increase your revenue.
thank you Brian that's what i was bloody thinking it was confusing the hell out of me
The depreciating domestic currency cause a reduction in the net price of a domestic product in the foreign market. However due to inelastic net exports, the net reduction in price leads to a reduction in revenue earned in export markets.
J is inside the narrow chin with a horizontal thin line block over it
What a beautiful man
Isn't it unrealistic for the J curve to come through the x-axis and go into surplus in that period of time? Surely a weaker currency alone would not be enough to cure the problem of a current account deficit regardless of how long it takes?
Ardi Janjeva Depends on the country and how important the exchange rate is in determining its trade position. Sure there are lots of other factors that could also do it, but for some countries a weaker currency on its own can well rectify a current account deficit particularly if it was a strong currency that led to it in the first place
***** I see. Are there any countries that you could use as examples to prove that this can be the case, where the economy is heavily reliant on exchange rates determining the structure of the economy as a whole?
Ardi Janjeva Japan is a very good example, China too. Japan has experienced the J curve effect in recent times - the best recent example I can give you
what's WIDEC ?
Weak Currency, Imports, Dear, Exports, Cheap
Weaker (Currency). Imports Dearer (more expensive). Exports Cheaper
my g
EOIS is magic
Surely if ped for exports < 1 and ped for imports < 1, the deficit will widen, even if the sum is greater than 1. Export revenues will fall as the % increase in volumes is lower than % fall in price. likewise import expenditure will increase as the rise in price is greater than the fall in volumes. Do the maths. What am I missing?
export revenue never falls. as the money is converted back into the currency, export revenue will always rise. The condition holds if the export revenue grows higher than the increase in import expenditure. Sorry for such a late reply, I'm sure you've mastered it over the last 3 years!
The condition isn't an equation, it's an inequality...
🤩
I'll rate you if you do that
🙃
freshie
It was long. It could be explained within 3 minutes
vikkstar > economics
extremely helpful ,thanks!!!!