This series is a great example of why Roderick is one of the great American explicators of modernist/post-modernist philosophy. For everyone complaining that this initial lecture is too relaxed in its pace and doesn't cut to the point; give him time. By the time he gets to his perspectives on Derrida and Baudrillard, you'll wish he had 8 hours per lecture. One of the great teachers of the 20th century, R.I.Power Rick.
🌵LOST🤮CAUSE🌵 I’ve been watching and rewatching these lectures for years now. I’m so glad he left these as a legacy. What a great human being “and a real character.” RIP
@Qimodis A pure negation that attaches we know not where. An 'impolite particle' with a negative valence, the shortest sentence a man can write and still convey meaning, however little. You have achieved quite a lot less than 'Qimodis wuz 'ere.' You make no point, no pun intended.
Hi. Here's one for you: if you want hope, you have to be prepared to die for it. If you place your hope in the hopeless, you will be wasting your life. So, it pays to study the world, ideology, science and culture as deeply as you can. Don't get derailed by the immediate. Understand how capitalist, class society is in a state of inner contradiction and can't last for ever.
I'm so glad I found this man's lectures. I can tell right away he's one of the greats. I take it he's gone now. Boy wouldn't it be amazing to have had a prof like this in school. I would have followed him home every night or bought him dinner so we could talk.
Thanks for making the video material accessible. The man had a great sense of humor, both feet on the ground and a gift for separating the wheat from the chaff. Above all, he was a great teacher!
I have no idea where my comments are going Keith and I can't quite recall what they were. More sententious prate, is my best guess. I apologise for being so self-indulgent. Sarcasm is not the lowest form of wit; laughing when someone bumps their head is, and that is ancient and ancestral and doesn't count. I was not careful enough and that equates to not respectful. Seems to me we're very similar in our outlook, seems like we've no real argument. Here's to you
What an awesome man- how he disseminates ideas are so awesome. I started with Baudrillard and now I am binge watching and will continue to rewatch these lectures... Thank you so much for the upload!!
I am re-watching this series once a year at minimum. Always with a new thought. Now I see how Neuromancer is a delicious paradox. Poet wrote about the highly instrumental future. This is why Neuromancer will always be a special book. There is no school to teach you how to write Gibson :)
He's like what I want Texas Rangers to be like. "Listen here slick. You'd better show some respect to the working Proletariat or else you've got a goddamned problem on your hands."
i would love to hear what rick has to say about our lives now considering the internet and social media have increased our information-overload tenfold.
It's double edged. I've learned a huge amount from the Internet. But it saps real world action. It is now full of material stemming from the establishment designed to divide us into increasingly smaller and more manageable alienated groups.
This guy is like Zizek only in that he's a philosopher that makes philosophy seem less pretentious and he's a Marxist. The way the two guys look at the world is very different, not in an opposing way, but quite different. I just felt I should say this because I love both philosophers and I think it trivialises their work by saying they're similar.
@Qimodis Of course it can seem pretentious, maybe a phrasing that wouldn't irritate you is saying that they have made it more accessible to people with no philosophy background or ones that come from a lower class with less time to fully delve into these topics. For a lower middle class factory worker, philosophy could totally be pretentious no?
I'd say Rodgers is closer to Marxism than Zisek. Rodgers appears to have been pole axed by the bringing down of the Soviet Union, like many left intellectuals. But a genuine guy.
To anyone reading the comments: The big difference between Rick Roderick and Slavoj Zizek as PUBLIC SPEAKERS is that Rick's intention is to inform people about ideas whereas Zizek is more interested in entertain the crowd and/or moving them into action. Philosophically, Zizek is at pains to open up philosophical discussion back to historical development but also to intervene in the problems of today. Rick Roderick seems to share the same concerns but compared to Zizek's work his approach lacks psychoanalytic and structuralist element to it. Also less sex jokes and discussions about Christianity.
I see what you're saying, but you might consider Rick's first Teaching Company lecture series: Philosophy and Human Values, in which Rick gets deliciously political and discusses Christianity at length--even going so far as to devote an entire lecture to Kierkegaard.
Keith Pieterse Anyone who reaches the status of a celebrity should be considered, by definition, overrated. But Zizek is a legitimately insightful philosopher and social critic. Just read his more philosophical works, like Sublime Object.
Right! Can I please get Southern effeminate male voice for my Google maps voiceover. Like a Todd Chrisley, "Danggit, now ya gotta make a u-turn cause ya don't listen...I swear y'all don't know whether to scratch your watch or wind your ass"
What if Roderick’s distaste with communism is just a cultural symptom as well. And if we’re being meta what if my pointing that out is a symptom of something else within me.
To Rick and many others from the south of the US I must offer my humble apologies. From here in Australia it is easy to surmise that that part of the US is a wasteland populated by historical sins that stubbornly resist modernity and devoid of intellectual inquiry. So sorry. What a great stimulating mind. I will sure be revisiting these lectures.
He was born & raised in West Texas. Unfortunately, he never received tenure at the Carolina institute he taught for so long, very hurtful. But his students & The Teaching Company, knew differently.
RR offers a coherent thesis which he conveys well, to see his understanding accessible. What he there understands and conveys, works for me. I think we then need to distinguish between religion and god. Religion is subject to the suspicion he speaks to. However, just as the masters of suspicion have come to their respective theses as Foucault might describe, or Neitzche or Heidegger might exemplify; just so have earlier thinkers and workers of language won through to theses fulcrumming in the won to idea of god. In the movement from that latter creation of theses, to the exploitation of such theses to mediate religion and all attaching to religion, the integrity of original creation is distorted and ultimately lost. That underlying truth is found again in people of faith that RR can praise. MLK rather exemplifying how subscription to a god-centred frame of reference, can see the contemporary grappled with, where the individual of faith (if akin to MLK) ontologically works through what the inventors of the god-thesis worked through to create that thesis origonally. I see RR as likely to not reject this distinction.
Does anyone know what Rick did in the years 1993-2002? He was apparently fired from Duke in 1993, and then nothing is known about him except that he died in 2002...
i believe his contract was up fter 8 years and was denied tenure for various reasons as many don't get tenure and move on. he simply fulfilled his contract and moved on to other places. please correct me if i am wrong. also he was involved in some student protests which may have ticked off the admins. of course i have just read some of this stuff scattered online. i don't know for sure any specifics.
When Rick talks about why people hated Clinton I finally understood what happend to me when Obama became president in 2008 for the first time. I was full of hope that something would change in the world, for the world, for me, but nothing has changed, and I was pissed. I never understood really that I was pissed for the lack of change because the hope portrayed by his “Yes we can” catchphrase turned out to be nothing more than a catchphrase. And I never blamed him for it because I already understood back then what it was and how it worked.
This is more referring to the last video in the series on Baudrillard and postmodernism but I wonder what Rick would have thought about Occulus Rift if he was still around or even a tv show like True Life: I am Amish or something like that. Regrding the latter, would the people living an amish life be equally as immersed in the hyper-real as urban dwelling young adults like myself/ ourselves?
With Facebook (oculus) and Microsoft (and probably many more corporations in the coming years) meshing into ‘Meta’’s metaverse, we’re right on track towards this virtual hyper-reality. I’m young and will probably see the 22nd century.. but I’m not so sure I’d even want to :/
@@hunter-pq1de yep i feel exactly the same, however I am likely older than you. I have a 14 year old, so I am concerned for his (and your) futures. It's getting closer to a version of the matrix.
it's really weird how this lecture isn't on audible despite it being part of the great courses series which audible has... maybe because he's talking about post-modernism and thats a touchy subject these days?
@@408sophon i'd never heard of Mark Fisher (not a huge You Tuber, but just listened to his video, ''The Slow Cancellation of the Future'' and found he's a man after my own heart. Thanks for the intro. I think Rick would not disagree with him either.
I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated
Nothing can keep up with Rick Roderick, but if you also like Podcasts I can recommend “Very Bad Wizards”, which is actually by a philosopher and a psychologist.
it's two completely different approaches. You must consider Zizek has the psychoanalytic insight far more developed than that of Rick. Also, Zizek is still alive and has witnessed lots of changes.
40:12 Dante passed through the gate to hell and came upon (and did NOT write) the phrase, "Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate", most frequently translated as "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here".
Lol just because an author wrote doesn't mean they think it. The opposite may eu just as true. What is written above the door of Plato's academy? Plato used Socrates as a mouth piece as did Shakespeare the fool. Esoteric reading is a hermeneutic contrary to this video.
So how can one understand the self with the complexities of society in some ways dictating the meaning of self??? Or is it that we find meaning in self through the complexities of society? If I make sense at all
Re: William Ellis post. The Charles Anderson course is available from the University of Wisconsin section of iTunes U: deimos3.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/Browse/wisc-public.1994055437
@4:29 Rick misrepresents Tarski here. Tarski was really concerned with mathematical truth (formal languages more generally), not metaphysical truth. All Tarski was saying is that in mathematics truth is always relative to axioms. This has nothing to do with real world facts and metaphysical notions of truth. It is only to the extent Tarski was implying all is mathematics that Tarski was wrong.
The modern suspicion levied at religious or spiritual rhetoric gains a lot of steam, in the mind of the accuser, from the projection of the repressed junk of the accuser himself.
Mr. Roderick seems to warm to his subject in a very leisurely manner. Listened to the first 15 minutes of this, and felt that he had shared virtually nothing to shed light on his topic of "The Self Under Siege." I think it's really the LISTENER/VIEWER under siege, in a kind of boredom game--who can hold out the longest to engage with the elusive subject?
+Seneca Just wait til you get to the part he says "There's just too much information. Too much of it." Still trying to polish this stone in the rough. At Marcuse so far.
You really have to be into what he has to say about the subject rather than him actually presenting the subject in any holistic way. I noticed it too but since I'm on the same page he is I enjoy these lectures immensely. He really is kind of a West Texas hick and an outsider who embraced many of the postmodern thinkers. Maybe the only one in West Texas to do this. lol RIP Rick.
@@sealedindictment if by quasi communism you mean that our so-called free economy is actually a chaotic maze of highly centralised, rigidly hierarchical planned economies then i would agree. So ironic that Capitalism presents itself as wholly distinct from Communism.
Pat Buchanan wants to return to slavery? I like listening to this guy but he's turning me off with some of his ridiculous statements. And in an earlier lecture he thought Jessie Jackson was a great guy. Maybe Jessie is an OK guy personally, but what's his philosophy? : use his connection to an historic figure to shake down corporations and profit from racial tensions.
Rick is fos in many ways. He's a real human being with all the failings of real humans. There used to be a fair number of real humans at one time believe it or not. (Don't believe it)
I am sure that is a joke. We all know Buchanan tells the truth about race and this is forbidden, so we joke about him. He was virtue signaling with Jesse Jackson. Nobody intelligent takes Jesse seriously.
@19:00 this is a terrible framing. Workers in the global south do not _necessarily_ need to sell US consumers anything, that's the myth or mercantilism or "export led growth". Whatever goods people in the global south can produce they can better use for themselves, the only reason they need to export is to pay for critical imports, so they only "need" to sell their domestic surplus. And even then, that is only to keep their FOREX rate stable, if they cannot export enough then they can tolerate pass-through inflation indefinitely, it is disruptive, but need not degrade their standard of living, and can over time increase their output so they later do have sufficient surplus to export to pay for their imports, now without the pass-through inflation. Also, finally, the developed nations can always _choose_ to provide free aid, so the critical imports needed are not being held to ransom against that poorer nation's lower domestic output rate. That's called treating people in other countries like our global brothers and sisters. Why would you not want to help them?
![Rick Roderick on Heidegger - The Rejection of Humanism [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sDqDJJcJAOg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Rick Roderick on Heidegger - The Rejection of Humanism [full length]](/img/tr.png)
![Rick Roderick on Marcuse - One-Dimensional Man [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WNAKr1TQ0xc/mqdefault.jpg)
This series is a great example of why Roderick is one of the great American explicators of modernist/post-modernist philosophy. For everyone complaining that this initial lecture is too relaxed in its pace and doesn't cut to the point; give him time. By the time he gets to his perspectives on Derrida and Baudrillard, you'll wish he had 8 hours per lecture. One of the great teachers of the 20th century, R.I.Power Rick.
🌵LOST🤮CAUSE🌵 I’ve been watching and rewatching these lectures for years now. I’m so glad he left these as a legacy. What a great human being “and a real character.” RIP
God, 8hr Roderick lectures would be a dream come true
@Qimodis A pure negation that attaches we know not where. An 'impolite particle' with a negative valence, the shortest sentence a man can write and still convey meaning, however little. You have achieved quite a lot less than 'Qimodis wuz 'ere.' You make no point, no pun intended.
I really do wish he had 8 hours per lecture
this series helped me through some shit
Agreed completely! I wish each lecture were way longer!
RIP Rick. You’ll never die you are immortal with this. ♥
I just went hiking while listening to these lectures ( one more time). Thank you Professor Roderick.
These lectures have only become more relevant over time. In fact, I would go so far as to say th at they are more relevant now than ever
The guy called everything we see now in 2023
Absolutely.
I enjoying watching his series a few times a year. Clears my head. Truly amazing.
Yes, although his I do have to cringe and bear it when it gets to bits like his description of Ghandi or MLK as great modern philosophers.
A great example of a philisopher. This lecture is as though he's reading my own existential crisis back to me.
I've watched this lecture about 50 times. How he closes, the despair and the disappointment..gets me everytime
That's like 2500 hours of your life. Must be a true philosopher . You ain't dishwashing for that "shit" they call cone
Money.
@@robertvillegas1329 lol true Rick fan more like it. Turned off more Neitzsche lectures than light switches in my time
Hi. Here's one for you: if you want hope, you have to be prepared to die for it. If you place your hope in the hopeless, you will be wasting your life. So, it pays to study the world, ideology, science and culture as deeply as you can. Don't get derailed by the immediate. Understand how capitalist, class society is in a state of inner contradiction and can't last for ever.
@@robertvillegas1329293 hours
Rest in peace. Great philosopher and teacher.
Well put! Seconded.
Thirded.
Fifthist!
I'm so glad I found this man's lectures. I can tell right away he's one of the greats. I take it he's gone now. Boy wouldn't it be amazing to have had a prof like this in school. I would have followed him home every night or bought him dinner so we could talk.
I was lucky to have one like this and I still treasure that course. Rick was a master.
@@penuts17 I just found him. Great!!!!!
He has been called the 'Bill Hicks of Philosophy'. I love Bill Hicks, but I think Bill was the 'Rick Roderick of Comedy'.
Eric Burns Bill Hicks is no where near on the level of Rick Roderick
Truly great mind, fine fine professor and teacher. I'm am so grateful for everybody connected to "The Partially Examined Life". Sincere regards.
I keep coming back to him for optimism, information, and motivation . God bless his memory.
Thanks for making the video material accessible. The man had a great sense of humor, both feet on the ground and a gift for separating the wheat from the chaff. Above all, he was a great teacher!
I have no idea where my comments are going Keith and I can't quite recall what they were. More sententious prate, is my best guess. I apologise for being so self-indulgent. Sarcasm is not the lowest form of wit; laughing when someone bumps their head is, and that is ancient and ancestral and doesn't count. I was not careful enough and that equates to not respectful. Seems to me we're very similar in our outlook, seems like we've no real argument. Here's to you
Someone described his lectures as a piece of good music. You keep coming back.
"It's hard to imagine Billy Graham being crucified. Although, I've suggested it on occasion." hahah priceless!
Really great thinkers are timeless. Prof Rick still on point decades later
I discovered this guy a couple of days ago and I'm becoming a huge fan.
What an awesome man- how he disseminates ideas are so awesome. I started with Baudrillard and now I am binge watching and will continue to rewatch these lectures... Thank you so much for the upload!!
I am re-watching this series once a year at minimum. Always with a new thought. Now I see how Neuromancer is a delicious paradox. Poet wrote about the highly instrumental future. This is why Neuromancer will always be a special book. There is no school to teach you how to write Gibson :)
I enjoy the west Texas drawl. Not what we normally associate with philosophy professors with a Marxist bent. He is very good.
He's like what I want Texas Rangers to be like. "Listen here slick. You'd better show some respect to the working Proletariat or else you've got a goddamned problem on your hands."
Best lecturer on Earth
I lLOVE this man! He needs to be ressurected, Cloned, Inthroned! What a wonderful great man!
Resurrected, cloned, placed into an artificial body and spread across the planet to teach our kids about whats going on?
"replicated, xeroxed!"
i would love to hear what rick has to say about our lives now considering the internet and social media have increased our information-overload tenfold.
His discussion on Beudrillard (sp?) is very eerily predictive of our current world - almost like he alone could see our future.
It's double edged. I've learned a huge amount from the Internet. But it saps real world action. It is now full of material stemming from the establishment designed to divide us into increasingly smaller and more manageable alienated groups.
This is an excellent series! I look forward to binge watching every video this channel has to present.
When he said "spurng gluglak gergleeee"... I felt that.
This guy is like Zizek only in that he's a philosopher that makes philosophy seem less pretentious and he's a Marxist. The way the two guys look at the world is very different, not in an opposing way, but quite different.
I just felt I should say this because I love both philosophers and I think it trivialises their work by saying they're similar.
@Qimodis Of course it can seem pretentious, maybe a phrasing that wouldn't irritate you is saying that they have made it more accessible to people with no philosophy background or ones that come from a lower class with less time to fully delve into these topics.
For a lower middle class factory worker, philosophy could totally be pretentious no?
@Qimodis Here's Qimodis with his timid little digs once more. How about you give us your reasoning? That should be good.
I'd say Rodgers is closer to Marxism than Zisek. Rodgers appears to have been pole axed by the bringing down of the Soviet Union, like many left intellectuals. But a genuine guy.
@@nutz9446not if they read what's relevant.
Paul Ricoeurs hermenutics of suspicion with US-examples. Eloquent in a special way, funny and thougth-provoking!!!
Thank you for everything you post.
Impeccable timestamps, thank you a lot
To anyone reading the comments:
The big difference between Rick Roderick and Slavoj Zizek as PUBLIC SPEAKERS is that Rick's intention is to inform people about ideas whereas Zizek is more interested in entertain the crowd and/or moving them into action.
Philosophically, Zizek is at pains to open up philosophical discussion back to historical development but also to intervene in the problems of today. Rick Roderick seems to share the same concerns but compared to Zizek's work his approach lacks psychoanalytic and structuralist element to it. Also less sex jokes and discussions about Christianity.
I see what you're saying, but you might consider Rick's first Teaching Company lecture series: Philosophy and Human Values, in which Rick gets deliciously political and discusses Christianity at length--even going so far as to devote an entire lecture to Kierkegaard.
RR is a master entertainer, what the heck are you talking about?
Let me get a party where Rick Roderick and Bill Hicks are the guests of honor!
"Everytime I want to leave "philosophy" and get back to "real life" =, they keep pulling me back in!"- Sylvio
Thank you, this is wonderful.
Thank you for posting these
He didn't die, he went into disguise as Zizek
Erik V Prang: Zizek is overrated.
@@Keithlfpieterse fuck are you talking about??
Keith Pieterse Anyone who reaches the status of a celebrity should be considered, by definition, overrated. But Zizek is a legitimately insightful philosopher and social critic. Just read his more philosophical works, like Sublime Object.
@@timhorton2486 He isn't overrated because his fame had more to do with his provocations and charisma than the actual content of his books.
@@Keithlfpieterse Read his books?
Thanks for posting this!
Anybody know how to quantify how dope this dudes suspenders are?
7
On a scale from 7 to 7.
yup
11 obviously
Quantify it as "Peak West Texan."
Came for the philosophy, stayed for the accent
Right! Can I please get Southern effeminate male voice for my Google maps voiceover. Like a Todd Chrisley, "Danggit, now ya gotta make a u-turn cause ya don't listen...I swear y'all don't know whether to scratch your watch or wind your ass"
i wish i could have a drink with Rick and talk about life
Well you can’t, but you can talk to us freaks on here..
@@nightoftheworld /r/acidmarxism is where I go for that
"God didn't really answer him; he just got pissed off." Hilarious!
When I saw masters of suspicion as the title I expected a metal guitar riff to open the video :P
I did the same thing!!! How did you know?!? Get out of my head!!!
Sorry. Sometimes I get a little... Paranoid.
I love how he says damn. “Whether we have free will or not, maybe we don’t give a day-um!”
I love him jabbing at sam Harris but 30 years ago lol
Ive watched this so much its so enjoyable
What if Roderick’s distaste with communism is just a cultural symptom as well. And if we’re being meta what if my pointing that out is a symptom of something else within me.
Likely, I'm sure he would welcome the critique though given his Socratic style. He knew he wasn't perfect.
To Rick and many others from the south of the US I must offer my humble apologies. From here in Australia it is easy to surmise that that part of the US is a wasteland populated by historical sins that stubbornly resist modernity and devoid of intellectual inquiry. So sorry.
What a great stimulating mind. I will sure be revisiting these lectures.
He was born & raised in West Texas. Unfortunately, he never received tenure at the Carolina institute he taught for so long, very hurtful. But his students & The Teaching Company, knew differently.
Thank you
Very interesting, although he clearly doesn't understand Christian Theology. I still appreciate his knowledge and explanations.
RR offers a coherent thesis which he conveys well, to see his understanding accessible. What he there understands and conveys, works for me.
I think we then need to distinguish between religion and god. Religion is subject to the suspicion he speaks to. However, just as the masters of suspicion have come to their respective theses as Foucault might describe, or Neitzche or Heidegger might exemplify; just so have earlier thinkers and workers of language won through to theses fulcrumming in the won to idea of god. In the movement from that latter creation of theses, to the exploitation of such theses to mediate religion and all attaching to religion, the integrity of original creation is distorted and ultimately lost.
That underlying truth is found again in people of faith that RR can praise. MLK rather exemplifying how subscription to a god-centred frame of reference, can see the contemporary grappled with, where the individual of faith (if akin to MLK) ontologically works through what the inventors of the god-thesis worked through to create that thesis origonally.
I see RR as likely to not reject this distinction.
He has a great since of humor.
A great course!
Does anyone know what Rick did in the years 1993-2002? He was apparently fired from Duke in 1993, and then nothing is known about him except that he died in 2002...
i would literally pay 1,000$ to read that unfinished autobiography. i've spent hours and hours pouring over all these videos. great stuff!
Why was he fired from Duke?
i believe his contract was up fter 8 years and was denied tenure for various reasons as many don't get tenure and move on. he simply fulfilled his contract and moved on to other places. please correct me if i am wrong. also he was involved in some student protests which may have ticked off the admins. of course i have just read some of this stuff scattered online. i don't know for sure any specifics.
john doe I would too. We should crowd fund a biopic of him. Amazing man.
When Rick talks about why people hated Clinton I finally understood what happend to me when Obama became president in 2008 for the first time. I was full of hope that something would change in the world, for the world, for me, but nothing has changed, and I was pissed. I never understood really that I was pissed for the lack of change because the hope portrayed by his “Yes we can” catchphrase turned out to be nothing more than a catchphrase. And I never blamed him for it because I already understood back then what it was and how it worked.
A Texas Marxist?! I’m in heaven.
This is more referring to the last video in the series on Baudrillard and postmodernism but I wonder what Rick would have thought about Occulus Rift if he was still around or even a tv show like True Life: I am Amish or something like that. Regrding the latter, would the people living an amish life be equally as immersed in the hyper-real as urban dwelling young adults like myself/ ourselves?
he addresses virtual reality many times in these lectures and in great detail.
With Facebook (oculus) and Microsoft (and probably many more corporations in the coming years) meshing into ‘Meta’’s metaverse, we’re right on track towards this virtual hyper-reality. I’m young and will probably see the 22nd century.. but I’m not so sure I’d even want to :/
@@hunter-pq1de yep i feel exactly the same, however I am likely older than you. I have a 14 year old, so I am concerned for his (and your) futures. It's getting closer to a version of the matrix.
And now with AI! He was truly prophetic
What is real about the hyper real?
it's really weird how this lecture isn't on audible despite it being part of the great courses series which audible has... maybe because he's talking about post-modernism and thats a touchy subject these days?
At 25:54 lol. Love this guy. RIP.
No one can say communism is stupid because we've never tried it but the move towards it had the monopolists on the run for a while.
Makes me wonder what Rick would have thought of Mark Fisher
@@408sophon i'd never heard of Mark Fisher (not a huge You Tuber, but just listened to his video, ''The Slow Cancellation of the Future'' and found he's a man after my own heart. Thanks for the intro. I think Rick would not disagree with him either.
Seth Galifianakis is really out there setting himself apart from his brother
I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated
Nothing can keep up with Rick Roderick, but if you also like Podcasts I can recommend “Very Bad Wizards”, which is actually by a philosopher and a psychologist.
it's two completely different approaches. You must consider Zizek has the psychoanalytic insight far more developed than that of Rick. Also, Zizek is still alive and has witnessed lots of changes.
40:12 Dante passed through the gate to hell and came upon (and did NOT write) the phrase, "Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate", most frequently translated as "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here".
41:26
Lol just because an author wrote doesn't mean they think it. The opposite may eu just as true. What is written above the door of Plato's academy? Plato used Socrates as a mouth piece as did Shakespeare the fool. Esoteric reading is a hermeneutic contrary to this video.
Yeah, lol. I was confused as hell, I mean, wth is he on about? That's not the epithet!
Any Unists come here after Nick's recent vid?
Thanks so much :-)
Nice ending to lecture 1/8
love how rick roderick shots down richard rorty
'Son, I've got a saddle older than Foucault.'
Why didn't I knew about this teacher long ago? Same think with zizek...
So how can one understand the self with the complexities of society in some ways dictating the meaning of self??? Or is it that we find meaning in self through the complexities of society? If I make sense at all
“Self” is a set of relational aspects, not an objective being.
7:00 "It happens in poo hauls"
A surprising remark about communism. I was pretty sure he'd defend the idea (but certainly not the project) of it.
Anyone asked before why the spelling of the siege is wrong in the playlist title?
is this Zizek's cousin?
7:14 You know, I do say that from time to time.
Genius
Dixie Žižek! :)
2022… we are in full simulation mode. VR etc…. Not enjoying it.
I like his deep breaths after each sentence. I imagine he loves to eat.
28:40, 36:46, 43:45
All this shit he's talking about here is 12x worse than it was in 2004 when he died.
‘The teaching company’?
Re: William Ellis post. The Charles Anderson course is available from the University of Wisconsin section of iTunes U: deimos3.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/Browse/wisc-public.1994055437
Damn, Zach Galifianakis' brother is well read.
@30:30 - hate everyone but they Love Jesus / Love God. That's actually covered in The Bible, verse "1 John 4:20". Calls them liars!
22:00 Rambling man. Hopes he pulls it back together again.
I like his version of it's raining today
@4:29 Rick misrepresents Tarski here. Tarski was really concerned with mathematical truth (formal languages more generally), not metaphysical truth. All Tarski was saying is that in mathematics truth is always relative to axioms. This has nothing to do with real world facts and metaphysical notions of truth. It is only to the extent Tarski was implying all is mathematics that Tarski was wrong.
He couldn't help himself could he? 7:15
I wonder what Rick would think about chatGPT. 😂
The modern suspicion levied at religious or spiritual rhetoric gains a lot of steam, in the mind of the accuser, from the projection of the repressed junk of the accuser himself.
The Teaching co. was too notch with Rick Roderick, now a days it sucks.
Self... I don't buy it. And you say to me "Self"... I say "Yeah, whose!?". Heh. Pfft. Yeah, "Self". I got bigger fish to fry...
"I DON'T CARE" because all roads lead to materialism ; since tradion superceded historical roots and the volk.
Clark James Jackson Brenda Hall Nancy
Mr. Roderick seems to warm to his subject in a very leisurely manner. Listened to the first 15 minutes of this, and felt that he had shared virtually nothing to shed light on his topic of "The Self Under Siege." I think it's really the LISTENER/VIEWER under siege, in a kind of boredom game--who can hold out the longest to engage with the elusive subject?
+Seneca Just wait til you get to the part he says "There's just too much information. Too much of it."
Still trying to polish this stone in the rough. At Marcuse so far.
You really have to be into what he has to say about the subject rather than him actually presenting the subject in any holistic way. I noticed it too but since I'm on the same page he is I enjoy these lectures immensely. He really is kind of a West Texas hick and an outsider who embraced many of the postmodern thinkers. Maybe the only one in West Texas to do this. lol RIP Rick.
"communism is stupid" lmao OK rick
jamalocaust Capitalism is a type of quasi communism which leads society to a consumerism conformity
@@sealedindictment if by quasi communism you mean that our so-called free economy is actually a chaotic maze of highly centralised, rigidly hierarchical planned economies then i would agree. So ironic that Capitalism presents itself as wholly distinct from Communism.
Ben Redmond well said
listen to this with lofi in the back. thank me later :)
Pat Buchanan wants to return to slavery? I like listening to this guy but he's turning me off with some of his ridiculous statements. And in an earlier lecture he thought Jessie Jackson was a great guy. Maybe Jessie is an OK guy personally, but what's his philosophy? : use his connection to an historic figure to shake down corporations and profit from racial tensions.
+Tim M The power structures need shaking down - they damn well shake us down everyday of our lives. Give some shit back.
I think the Buchanan statement was a joke.
Everything I've read from Pat Buchanan suggests that he wouldn't have a problem with some form of slavery for non-whites/poor people.
Rick is fos in many ways. He's a real human being with all the failings of real humans. There used to be a fair number of real humans at one time believe it or not. (Don't believe it)
I am sure that is a joke. We all know Buchanan tells the truth about race and this is forbidden, so we joke about him. He was virtue signaling with Jesse Jackson. Nobody intelligent takes Jesse seriously.
@19:00 this is a terrible framing. Workers in the global south do not _necessarily_ need to sell US consumers anything, that's the myth or mercantilism or "export led growth". Whatever goods people in the global south can produce they can better use for themselves, the only reason they need to export is to pay for critical imports, so they only "need" to sell their domestic surplus. And even then, that is only to keep their FOREX rate stable, if they cannot export enough then they can tolerate pass-through inflation indefinitely, it is disruptive, but need not degrade their standard of living, and can over time increase their output so they later do have sufficient surplus to export to pay for their imports, now without the pass-through inflation. Also, finally, the developed nations can always _choose_ to provide free aid, so the critical imports needed are not being held to ransom against that poorer nation's lower domestic output rate. That's called treating people in other countries like our global brothers and sisters. Why would you not want to help them?