Trading Less Tolerant Iron Condors

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @inputexpert
    @inputexpert 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Tom and Tony . You need to have the research team take your 2023 trades (real data) and show what works and not. eg, What are winners, why, losers, why. Show us, practice what you preach. Like Tradevue or Tradezilla.

  • @PEOdysseus
    @PEOdysseus 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    it would be nice if you guys put in a visual of the iron condors and other trades more often please.

  • @buzzman17
    @buzzman17 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this video! I've begun trading 0dte spx iron condors only very recently and any time I have tried to close out to protect against a loss, if I had just let the trade go to end of day I would have been positive. I know it's different than 45 day iron condors, but the point you make about already having bought the wings for protection really clicked with me.

  • @davidkostic4353
    @davidkostic4353 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry novice here. Does no stop loss basically mean you should basically just do a strangle instead of an Iron Condor?

    • @me4901
      @me4901 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No a stop loss is very different from not having the corresponding options.

  • @williamklein6749
    @williamklein6749 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So is the no-stop loss using a 21 day close/roll?

    • @Rockingstars
      @Rockingstars 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      correct

  • @manjubn7211
    @manjubn7211 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    bruhat pen drive factory open maadi?

  • @timothydoubek8107
    @timothydoubek8107 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks for this one, who would have any friends left after Mony Hall-ing them publicly?

  • @AAmtb
    @AAmtb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If you look at your p/l chart (one that accounts for greeks), if the stock moves even a tiny bit with 40 dte you're at a loss. Kind of weird anyone would set a stop loss bc I'd be hit sooner and often.

    • @balintvarga5146
      @balintvarga5146 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A symmetrical IC is roughly delta neutral at the start, so I think the main reason is not letting mean reversion play out. e.g. a stock goes up 5% between 45dte and 21dte, you stop out, and then a correction happens after 21dte AND you lose out on a faster theta decay too, and these combined can mess up the stop loss strategy.

  • @benperrone511
    @benperrone511 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe someone can help me out here: With a ( for example) 30 (delta) -10 ) how is that set up? Am I looking for a price at the .30 delta and taking it .10 delta's wide? $10 wide? little insight on this would be great.

  • @altair_204
    @altair_204 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most likely stop losses are hurting because due to the slow overall theta decay in ICs, it means you will be at a loss between the breakeven points, and not far from the middle point for pretty long through 45 - 21 DTE cycle

    • @r.alexander9075
      @r.alexander9075 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They have shown (although in very limited capacity because it doesnt align with their values) that including both a stop-loss AND a profit-take was the best strategy, in some of the shorter trades (1DTE,0DTE)

  • @tyman2007
    @tyman2007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Can you guys run the same research on ODTE iron condors and or credit spreads ? Great research.

    • @chrisbasnett
      @chrisbasnett 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Trade iron flys in 0DTE.. take profit at 25 percent of max profit. Buy the wings wherever the following days expected move. Been working great recently

    • @GoldenAura32
      @GoldenAura32 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chrisbasnettill have to give this a try

  • @michaelwelch103
    @michaelwelch103 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have moved away from spreads trades, I had a 75 percent win rate and had a net loss.

    • @freeagent.87
      @freeagent.87 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      same, one loser wipes out so many winners with these

  • @elliottmg1
    @elliottmg1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im out at 2x times the credit. Stop losses are tricky

  • @terrymoss758
    @terrymoss758 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m a true novice, but this basically comes down to trusting the statistical models that you bet with in the beginning.

    • @GoldenAura32
      @GoldenAura32 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Correct. If you enter the trade with even a slight advantage, over time you will win.

  • @djayjp
    @djayjp หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stop losses are for losers lol. Buying protection 👌

  • @dinosgura
    @dinosgura 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    On an Iron Condor on NQ, last november, i lost also my pants.

    • @benchiudean8254
      @benchiudean8254 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same

    • @diegokru
      @diegokru 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I guess it was too wide or size too big.

    • @whatsup4807
      @whatsup4807 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PUNTING on this strategy = Not 100% be the winner with 0% loss.

    • @me4901
      @me4901 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If you lost your pants then you had too big a size. You KNOW the max loss in a Iron Condor.

    • @dinosgura
      @dinosgura 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@me4901 correct, i undervalued the upside potential, especially during the seasonality.😔

  • @randyhibshman3682
    @randyhibshman3682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    for even the best PNLs shown here (about 2% ROIC) it’s a wonder anyone wants to sell 45 DTE iron condors in the SP 500.

    • @Dadvestor
      @Dadvestor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What do you recommend? Also I’m not sure but I don’t think average PL / BPR is ROC.

    • @randyhibshman3682
      @randyhibshman3682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Dadvestor I like 14 DTE short vertical spreads in SPX and RUT, using technical analysis to guide whether bearish or bullish. I only add the complementary spread for an IC to help mitigate losers. I have revised “ROC” to return on invested capital (ROIC). If PNL is analogous to “return” and BPR is analogous to “invested capital,” then I ask you to explain why PNL/BP is different from ROIC.

    • @Dadvestor
      @Dadvestor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@randyhibshman3682 thanks for sharing that, I do something similar. What is a ballpark ROIC for you? I don’t know exactly why but I don’t think 2% is really what you would expect and my results running their strategy is higher than 2%

    • @TokisanGames
      @TokisanGames 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Given that there are 12 monthly expirations, we're looking at 12x the shown 1.1-4.3% P&L/BPR, compounded. Say that averages 2%, then it's 1.02^12 = 26% annual ROIC.

    • @randyhibshman3682
      @randyhibshman3682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TokisanGames I also looked at compounding. I think it is generous to say that a 45 DTE trade compounds 12 times per year. I think compounding 8 times per year (365 / 45) is a better estimate for achieving closer to the full 2% profit. Compounding 12 times per year would probably be taking 50% of max profit. At 2% return per trade cycle, compounded 8 times per year, 1.02^8 = 1.17, which is on par with the total return of just selling 30 delta covered calls in SPY, assuming 8-10% appreciation in the underlying. It’s good but not great.