This is one of the few situations where I will suggest that the _not_ father remaining contact with the children. Why? Because when they get a little bit older, I guarantee they will pick him over their mother. Especially the oldest one who walked in on her and her a fair partner in the first place. You can't undo that kind of damage.
My wife immediately agreed on DNA tests on our children as soon as they were born, due to will purposes. I wondered why she agreed to it without any hint of disgust or shock. She told me a story of her cousin (M), who found out his wife cheated on him, and his four kids were not his. It absolutely destroyed him. My wife was the one who comforted him, and helped him get back on his feet. I met the cousin at our wedding, who whispered in my ear to take care of this angel of a woman, or he would break me. I never realized what he meant until she told me the story. 30 years married, still as happy as ever. The cousin remarried, and is now living a peaceful life with his new wife and his two boys (yes, he did get them tested, they are his)
I truly wish outcomes like this were possible, however with the ages of the children, most judges lean towards what’s best for them not the supposed father. It would be very hard, after over a decade of parenting for the oldest child, for the judge not to have him continue paying child support after the divorce “for the benefit of the children”. If we want to have this type of story cease to exist, we should have paternity/DNA tests done at birth. Paternity fraud would no longer be a problem. If this is too “drastic” for conspiracy theorists, at least make paternity fraud a major felony across the country (without a statute of limitations). This would at least help deter some spouses from trying paternity fraud as a gambit. To all those who think these comments are too harsh, remember, the only person that knows the child is positively theirs at birth is the mother. All the rest of us are dependent upon “trust”, period.
I would have absolutely no problem doing a paternity test at birth because I know all my children are my husbands. All our children even look like a combination of us with the exception of two, our one daughter looks just like my husband and our one son looks just like me. The only women that would ever have a problem with doing a paternity test at birth are the ones that aren’t sure if their husband/boyfriend is the father.
I say in this day, I feel all men whether married or single a DNA test should be done. There are too many of these cases where the women are pregnant while married. It sickening that there is no protection for the men in these situations. Women like these are becoming more the norm.
I think that one of the children actually walked in on the affair was a contributing factor to her losing. Even if the wife wants to claim that the house is an unsuitable environment, it's only because of her because multiple witnesses can corroborate that she was in bed with another man.
And this is why mandatory DNA testing at birth should be forced into law.
The fact this happened while family was present meaning she can’t turn any relatives against OP
I was him. I would wait till after the divorce’s final before sending her employer anything
i bet op soon to be ex wife is going to regret cheating on op when she lose everything
This woman is evil in its purest form.
This is one of the few situations where I will suggest that the _not_ father remaining contact with the children. Why? Because when they get a little bit older, I guarantee they will pick him over their mother. Especially the oldest one who walked in on her and her a fair partner in the first place. You can't undo that kind of damage.
My wife immediately agreed on DNA tests on our children as soon as they were born, due to will purposes. I wondered why she agreed to it without any hint of disgust or shock. She told me a story of her cousin (M), who found out his wife cheated on him, and his four kids were not his. It absolutely destroyed him. My wife was the one who comforted him, and helped him get back on his feet.
I met the cousin at our wedding, who whispered in my ear to take care of this angel of a woman, or he would break me. I never realized what he meant until she told me the story. 30 years married, still as happy as ever. The cousin remarried, and is now living a peaceful life with his new wife and his two boys (yes, he did get them tested, they are his)
I truly wish outcomes like this were possible, however with the ages of the children, most judges lean towards what’s best for them not the supposed father. It would be very hard, after over a decade of parenting for the oldest child, for the judge not to have him continue paying child support after the divorce “for the benefit of the children”. If we want to have this type of story cease to exist, we should have paternity/DNA tests done at birth. Paternity fraud would no longer be a problem. If this is too “drastic” for conspiracy theorists, at least make paternity fraud a major felony across the country (without a statute of limitations). This would at least help deter some spouses from trying paternity fraud as a gambit. To all those who think these comments are too harsh, remember, the only person that knows the child is positively theirs at birth is the mother. All the rest of us are dependent upon “trust”, period.
I now encourage every man to get a paternity test and woman to do so as well if they really want to support men.
I would have absolutely no problem doing a paternity test at birth because I know all my children are my husbands. All our children even look like a combination of us with the exception of two, our one daughter looks just like my husband and our one son looks just like me. The only women that would ever have a problem with doing a paternity test at birth are the ones that aren’t sure if their husband/boyfriend is the father.
I say in this day, I feel all men whether married or single a DNA test should be done. There are too many of these cases where the women are pregnant while married. It sickening that there is no protection for the men in these situations. Women like these are becoming more the norm.
I think that one of the children actually walked in on the affair was a contributing factor to her losing. Even if the wife wants to claim that the house is an unsuitable environment, it's only because of her because multiple witnesses can corroborate that she was in bed with another man.
Glad op dna and soon tobe ex wife and the lover
Regret everything
Happy.now divorce later
Karma