The way Michael was able to give us 40 years of music and different vocal styles and textures but still stay true to his unique sound. Freddie was inspired by classical musical music I can tell. Both are unique and strong.
Freddie's voice was far more powerful then Michael's voice especially in the 80's. Both of of them had beautiful voices, and unique sounds, you knew who you were listening to when you hear a song by either.
@@ZENOBlAmusic disagree.. of course I’ll always put respect on Freddie’s name because he had a great range and was a dynamic musical performer. Queen isn’t my favourite rock band though. Nirvana is. And I find even Kurt Cobain’s voice to be more distinctive. This a subjective thing, we should each just enjoy the artists we prefer without getting into these debates..they really go nowhere.
@@Credin84 These desperate Mercury fans trying to seek relevance under literally every comment section. Listen and listen carefully once and for all. Freddie Mercury is in no way, shape or form the greatest male vocalist of all time. Not by technique. Not by range. And most definitely not by versatility. Lmfao. Poor old rock singer. That's the only genre he conquered. His pathetic mere attempt at Opera was a joke. And Queen's attempt at a disco album, "Hot Space" was a global commercial failure. Their own fans disowned Mercury after that record. Learn the difference between singing in a genre and proving yourself in that genre. Michael Jackson has a 4 Octave Range and could easily reach 5 octaves. Michael Jackson proved himself in every genre of music from pop, rock, r&b, disco, funk, new jack swing, hard-rock, soul, you name it. Michael Jackson is a child prodigy. Michael Jackson has been singing "soul" songs since he was 5 years old. Mercury is in every way shape and form, the most overrated male vocalist of all time. For the 0 intellect bots, who say he commanded the stage. Yea, running around topless with a microphone stand, is not what you call commanding the stage. What a joke. I could name a hundred singers better than Mercury. Steve Perry alone takes it by miles. Robert Plant, Luther Vandross etc. you name em. Go back to your Queen hole and worship Mercury. P.S, It is a global known fact that Mercury was a sex, alcohol and coke addict who shared his bed with men. THAT IS FACTS!🎯💯💯💯
There's no comparison for me... Freddie is my favourite singer, there is no one else that comes even close to his talent and musicality in my opinion ❤️💕
Freddie learned singing by himself, he never took lessons. The only lessons he got was for playing Piano. Anything else is just himself. Michael of course is trained and is very professional when it comes to Singing. His Vibrato is very clean and perfect. Examples for how professional he is are just that he never over shoots his voice or does any extra crazy non professional stuff that Freddie loves to do (ESPECIALLY Live). In Freddie's voice I feel more freedom because it is raw and not perfect, not even on Studio, yet he creates masterpieces like for example Bohemian Rhapsody with that voice. Of course I absolutely Love MJ, can't talk enough on how he literally already makes music by just his Vocal tracks, and his beatboxing and all that stuff, but when he started in 1996 to lip sync at Live shows it did make me pretty sad. I forgot some of the reasonings, but one of them was he didn't feel good, and Freddie on the other hand goes sick to concerts and does incredible stuff. Also in studio, after Freddie officially had Aids, on studio he sounds incredible, and then there is the Show Must Go On, the story behind that is just absolutely incredible, my guy was literally dying there in front of the mic but his vocals to that song are too insane and really strong, especially the belting high notes in there, the whole story of that song is just mind blowing. Freddie also has a bigger vocal range, F2-F#6. Michaels is F#2-C#6. In The Jacksons song Different Kind of Lady at the end of the song, if it was Michael harmonizing in the back and if these notes were actually F#6s then it would be F#2-F#6. But here is the thing, I believe that actually Michael could go even higher than his official Vocal range which goes up to C#6 I think he could go higher than Freddie simply because Michael hits these high note with ease since his voice is a little high in general. So the thing about this is Michaels professionalism. He didn't need it for himself and he was too professional to even try. While Freddie just did it because he can. Freddie also might go up to A6, G6 or C7. But the shows at where he hit these are really bad recordings which is why it isn't official if these are the actual notes. But at least Freddie played around with his voice like that. While Michael was just stuck to being professional because thats how he learned singing. I don't prefer either of them I really love love them both. When it comes to live shows though, I have to give it to Freddie, because he absolutely despised lip syncing always wanted to perform and sing even if he was sick. He could control crowds like no other. And while Michael does absolutely amazing unique Choreographs and stuff, I think as much as Freddie runs around, does his own moves, does pushups on stage and all that random stuff he does, it is pretty comparable in terms of singing while doing so much movement on stage. Queen in general always made their live shows better than their studio songs, which song wise with Michael this wasn't always the case. But great Video. Have you heard the songs they have sung together yet? if not check out ''There Must Be More to Life Than This '' and ''State of Shock'' sung by MJ and Freddie. They planned one more song called Victory but they never got around to finish it, there is a demo recording somewhere somewhere but it was never public. And yes the name ''Victory'' of Michaels Victory Tour came from Michaels and Freddie's song Victory. if Freddie didn't die so soon we might have had a Freddie and Michael album.
I'm early so I'll just drop a recommendation for you to react to Jazmine Sullivan's girl like me from okay now listen session, Please Love this reaction btw. and happy New year
Great reaction. Both are legends for far more then their voices, I think that is something people sometimes don't understand, it is really a whole package. I suggest you heck out Barcelona - Freddie Mercury & Montserrat Caballe, he made an album with a opera singer. Michael had far more vocal training then Freddie, and yet by the time of Michael's History tour he was doing full out lip synching tours. Freddie Mercury at an older age could still sing live and tour. Freddie Mercury's voice was amazing in his final years. From my perspective, I think that Michael Jackson might have been more concerned with entertainment and dancing then with his singing. Which is why I think it is important to realize, that both of these artists were not just singers. Singing is only the end product and something that people can easily judge, or it is something most people notice first. That is a huge part of the general appeal of these artists. Of course they have different styles, on top of that they had different voice types as well, Michael Jackson was a Lyric Tenor and Freddie Mercury was a Spinto Tenor, so their voices had different qualities. It is like apples and oranges.
One of the biggest forks in the road when it comes to comparing these two in this way is the fact that Freddie Mercury was the frontman of a band and Michael Jackson was a solo artist. This distinction is important because Michael Jackson being the ''main attraction'' means that he didn't have to share any of the spotlight with three or four other bandmates, while Freddie did. For this reason Freddie's isolated vocal performances will always be left sounding a bit more empty in comparisons like this because his lines aren't as elaborate and he doesn't use as many backup vocalists, whereas Michael's songs are all quite a bit more vocal-oriented than Queen's. Both of these guys are absolute legends and always will be.
What are you talking about. MJ started off being a front man at 5. As for professional training, MJ was trained in his home with his mom, dad and brothers...they both great. But MJ came "RAW!"...from the streets to the King of Pop on pure talent...
My friend you must to START to react Queen songs ! Lets start with Queen - Somebody To Love - HD Live - 1981 Montreal . Thank you for your all work.We love you
Off topic, I’ve seen some posts lately from a “Just the Voice Backup!”. I haven’t watched any of them but they are your old reaction videos. Was wondering if it was you or someone impersonating you for views. Anyway, love Freddie, Michael, and this video. Thanks!
Freddie Mercury was the best. He was also the one who wore "one sequined glove" first. Freddie Mercury wore one glove in 1975 in the video "Liar." Michael liked the one glove look of Freddy so he copied it in the 80s. Michael Jackson also was not the first to do the Moonwalk. The first was Bill Bailey at the Apollo in 1955 and the second was Jeffrey Daniel in 1982 who taught it to Michael Jackson.
This wasn't a really good video to react to, it felt slightly one sided. They didn't really give Michael Jackson's voice justice but they had put more effort on Freddie's part, regardless, my opinion is that I think Michael is slightly better...His voice is extremely strong even though he's really soft spoken in shy. He has good stamina and I believe that Michael never took vocal lessons when he started the Jackson 5. If I remember correctly, at 5 years old he didn't have any vocal training, just like he didn't have any training for dancing. Michael has this amazing grit and in his voice overall you can hear more power, emotion, and passion. It's slightly annoying on how people like to underestimate his voice. People haven't just heard some of his rare or unnoticed songs. People claim that Michaels singing voice is soft compare to Freddie's but that is not at all the case. MJ's voice is actually more powerful, and no matter what anyone's opinion is they have to agree on that. Michael's voice fits in the rock and roll and rock genre, his grit and aggressive screams are out of this world. If you listen to come together, dirty diana, and so on...I think most would agree that Michaels voice was made for rock and roll. But yeah, I just think Michael is better overall. His voice has something that Freddie doesn't.
Though both were probably the most theatrical on-stage performers in ALL of history, Michael's were more dance-based and rehearsed while Freddie's were more vocal-based and improvised. This is most clearly seen with what they ventured into later on in their careers. Michael lip-synced more to focus on the choreography, while Freddie took up opera. What I will say is Baby Mike was sustaining them Bb5s in belt. Both kings/queens of background vocals and sheer musicality.
MJ got better vocals & a way wider range plus he was more versatile He’s The Greatest Singer Of All Time FOREVER!👑✨💯(They could’ve picked way better songs than this tho for MJ vocal wise)
Freddie's Vocal range is officially bigger, but I believe Michael could go higher than Freddie just because he had a high voice in general. More versatile in what way? Freddie sang in more genres than Michael and Freddie failed absolutely non of them. And they could've picked better songs for both of em, they always go for the popular stuff.
@@Milkers777 You're*. You are just like the people that call MJ a pedo do you realize that? I speak facts here and you come back with absolutely nothing but insults just because you can't agree with reality. Freddie's Vocal range is F2-F#6 and Michael's is F#2-C-6. Freddie sang Rock, Blues, Rhythm and blues, Speed Metal, Gospel, Middle Eastern, Opera, Pop, Medieval, Progressive, Country, Disstrack, Ragtime, Acoustic, Ballads, Funk, Rockabilly, Soul Rock, Disco, Heavy Metal, Orchestral, Cultural and Dance. Now come back with a valid argument as to where my points are wrong kid.
@@Milkers777 You are an embarrassment for Michael Jackson fans. Ben ben just answered statements that you have claimed, that are not true in reality. He did not even involve his opinion into this nor did he state who he favors, he just said how it is. Freddie sang in more genres than Michael which makes him more versatile and his range on paper is bigger or as you said wider than Michaels. While he also mentions that he thinks Michael can sing higher than Freddie but had never actually done it. The Delusional and wrong one is you.
@@ben1ben Um! it is not that deep first off MJ was & will always be Innocent also Freddie is highly overrated he is not discussed amongst the greatest vocalist like MJ always is tbh and i tried being nice but here we go...These desperate Mercury fans trying to seek relevance under literally every comment section. Listen and listen carefully once and for all. Freddie Mercury is in no way, shape or form the greatest male vocalist of all time. Not by technique. Not by range. And most definitely not by versatility. Lmfao. Poor old rock singer. That's the only genre he conquered. His pathetic mere attempt at Opera was a joke. And Queen's attempt at a disco album, "Hot Space" was a global commercial failure. Their own fans disowned Mercury after that record. Learn the difference between singing in a genre and proving yourself in that genre. Michael Jackson has a 4 Octave Range and could easily reach 5 octaves. Michael Jackson proved himself in every genre of music from pop, rock, r&b, disco, funk, new jack swing, hard-rock, soul, you name it. Michael Jackson is a child prodigy. Michael Jackson has been singing "soul" songs since he was 5 years old. Mercury is in every way shape and form, the most overrated male vocalist of all time. For the 0 intellect bots, who say he commanded the stage. Yea, running around topless with a microphone stand, is not what you call commanding the stage. What a joke. I could name a hundred singers better than Mercury. Steve Perry alone takes it by miles. Robert Plant, Luther Vandross etc. you name em. Go back to your Queen hole and worship Mercury. P.S, It is a global known fact that Mercury was a sex, alcohol and coke addict who shared his bed with men. THAT IS FACTS!🎯💯💯💯
Happy New Year! 🎉
Michael Jackson’s vibrato is just unreal 🤦🏾♀️
The way Michael was able to give us 40 years of music and different vocal styles and textures but still stay true to his unique sound. Freddie was inspired by classical musical music I can tell. Both are unique and strong.
I wonder what more Freddie Mercury and Queen could have accomplished if he hadn't died so young.
Mike had this crazy power in his voice that’s just 🔥
While Freddie’s voice is beautiful, Mike’s is distinctive, his style is absolutely unique.
Freddie's voice was far more powerful then Michael's voice especially in the 80's. Both of of them had beautiful voices, and unique sounds, you knew who you were listening to when you hear a song by either.
@@ZENOBlAmusic disagree.. of course I’ll always put respect on Freddie’s name because he had a great range and was a dynamic musical performer.
Queen isn’t my favourite rock band though. Nirvana is. And I find even Kurt Cobain’s voice to be more distinctive.
This a subjective thing, we should each just enjoy the artists we prefer without getting into these debates..they really go nowhere.
@@ZENOBlAmusic Michael Jackson’s power in the Bad Era is unmatched sorry
WTF? Freddie's not distinctive? What are you smoking?
And Freddie's wasn't distinctive?
Both legends
Great reaction video. Please do more MJ reaction videos I always looked forward to your MJ reactions and commentary. 👊🏿
They didn’t really do Mikes voice justice in this even tho he was still great. I wish they would’ve played the bridge of thriller or Earth song
Or songs like Stranger In Moscow,You Are Not Alone or even She’s Out Of My Life👑🌟
@@Milkers777 Definitely "Stranger In Moscow"
They didn't even get the hardest songs from Queen, MJ couldn't sing "In my defense", MJ was a genious and a better artist, but voice? MJ had no chance
@@Credin84 These desperate Mercury fans trying to seek relevance under literally every comment section. Listen and listen carefully once and for all. Freddie Mercury is in no way, shape or form the greatest male vocalist of all time. Not by technique. Not by range. And most definitely not by versatility. Lmfao. Poor old rock singer. That's the only genre he conquered. His pathetic mere attempt at Opera was a joke. And Queen's attempt at a disco album, "Hot Space" was a global commercial failure. Their own fans disowned Mercury after that record. Learn the difference between singing in a genre and proving yourself in that genre. Michael Jackson has a 4 Octave Range and could easily reach 5 octaves. Michael Jackson proved himself in every genre of music from pop, rock, r&b, disco, funk, new jack swing, hard-rock, soul, you name it. Michael Jackson is a child prodigy. Michael Jackson has been singing "soul" songs since he was 5 years old.
Mercury is in every way shape and form, the most overrated male vocalist of all time. For the 0 intellect bots, who say he commanded the stage. Yea, running around topless with a microphone stand, is not what you call commanding the stage. What a joke. I could name a hundred singers better than Mercury. Steve Perry alone takes it by miles. Robert Plant, Luther Vandross etc. you name em. Go back to your Queen hole and worship Mercury.
P.S, It is a global known fact that Mercury was a sex, alcohol and coke addict who shared his bed with men. THAT IS FACTS!🎯💯💯💯
@@Credin84 this is such a bad take
Now you know YOU HAVE to do part 2! I love acapella 🔥💕
I like Freddie’s voice and technique more personally.
MICHAEL JACKSON IS THE KING 💕
And Freddy Mercury is QUEEN!!! 😋😁🥰 How about that?!?! Two of the greatest of all time and two of my personal favorites.
@@jenniferhood2441 The King Always Remains Supreme MJ Is The Greatest Ever Forever!🙇🏽♂👑💝✨💯
@@Milkers777 There's no way of definitely determining who is better. You just prefer MJ.
@@lucaswallo8127 How about actual facts… MJ is the most successful entertainer in music history
Freddie! He was able to sing every genre of the music
LOVED your reaction as always! What an honor 🤩
Freddie all the way!
Michael Jackson is just on a whole different level, there is not anyone that can ever come close to him!
We love you MJ
Shine & shine on forever King
There's no comparison for me... Freddie is my favourite singer, there is no one else that comes even close to his talent and musicality in my opinion ❤️💕
So much feel for rythm when MJ sings.. i feel the rythm even without the music
Michael Jackson breathy voice is sooo underrated.
finally, hope you could do more mj
Two of greatest of all time
Freddie learned singing by himself, he never took lessons. The only lessons he got was for playing Piano. Anything else is just himself. Michael of course is trained and is very professional when it comes to Singing. His Vibrato is very clean and perfect. Examples for how professional he is are just that he never over shoots his voice or does any extra crazy non professional stuff that Freddie loves to do (ESPECIALLY Live). In Freddie's voice I feel more freedom because it is raw and not perfect, not even on Studio, yet he creates masterpieces like for example Bohemian Rhapsody with that voice. Of course I absolutely Love MJ, can't talk enough on how he literally already makes music by just his Vocal tracks, and his beatboxing and all that stuff, but when he started in 1996 to lip sync at Live shows it did make me pretty sad. I forgot some of the reasonings, but one of them was he didn't feel good, and Freddie on the other hand goes sick to concerts and does incredible stuff. Also in studio, after Freddie officially had Aids, on studio he sounds incredible, and then there is the Show Must Go On, the story behind that is just absolutely incredible, my guy was literally dying there in front of the mic but his vocals to that song are too insane and really strong, especially the belting high notes in there, the whole story of that song is just mind blowing. Freddie also has a bigger vocal range, F2-F#6. Michaels is F#2-C#6. In The Jacksons song Different Kind of Lady at the end of the song, if it was Michael harmonizing in the back and if these notes were actually F#6s then it would be F#2-F#6. But here is the thing, I believe that actually Michael could go even higher than his official Vocal range which goes up to C#6 I think he could go higher than Freddie simply because Michael hits these high note with ease since his voice is a little high in general. So the thing about this is Michaels professionalism. He didn't need it for himself and he was too professional to even try. While Freddie just did it because he can. Freddie also might go up to A6, G6 or C7. But the shows at where he hit these are really bad recordings which is why it isn't official if these are the actual notes. But at least Freddie played around with his voice like that. While Michael was just stuck to being professional because thats how he learned singing. I don't prefer either of them I really love love them both. When it comes to live shows though, I have to give it to Freddie, because he absolutely despised lip syncing always wanted to perform and sing even if he was sick. He could control crowds like no other. And while Michael does absolutely amazing unique Choreographs and stuff, I think as much as Freddie runs around, does his own moves, does pushups on stage and all that random stuff he does, it is pretty comparable in terms of singing while doing so much movement on stage. Queen in general always made their live shows better than their studio songs, which song wise with Michael this wasn't always the case. But great Video. Have you heard the songs they have sung together yet? if not check out ''There Must Be More to Life Than This '' and ''State of Shock'' sung by MJ and Freddie. They planned one more song called Victory but they never got around to finish it, there is a demo recording somewhere somewhere but it was never public. And yes the name ''Victory'' of Michaels Victory Tour came from Michaels and Freddie's song Victory. if Freddie didn't die so soon we might have had a Freddie and Michael album.
MJ>Freddie
@@Milkers777 your opinion
@@ben1ben FACT!
@@ben1ben The correct opinion. MJs the greatest.
Michael sang live at his 2001 Anniversary concert in NYC and was absolutely amazing.
I'm early so I'll just drop a recommendation for you to react to Jazmine Sullivan's girl like me from okay now listen session, Please
Love this reaction btw.
and happy New year
Love both these fantastic talented guys but MJ 👌🏻❤️
Michael Jackson all the way
Great reaction. Both are legends for far more then their voices, I think that is something people sometimes don't understand, it is really a whole package. I suggest you heck out Barcelona - Freddie Mercury & Montserrat Caballe, he made an album with a opera singer. Michael had far more vocal training then Freddie, and yet by the time of Michael's History tour he was doing full out lip synching tours. Freddie Mercury at an older age could still sing live and tour. Freddie Mercury's voice was amazing in his final years. From my perspective, I think that Michael Jackson might have been more concerned with entertainment and dancing then with his singing. Which is why I think it is important to realize, that both of these artists were not just singers. Singing is only the end product and something that people can easily judge, or it is something most people notice first. That is a huge part of the general appeal of these artists. Of course they have different styles, on top of that they had different voice types as well, Michael Jackson was a Lyric Tenor and Freddie Mercury was a Spinto Tenor, so their voices had different qualities. It is like apples and oranges.
MERCURY KING ROCK
We need part 2
One of the biggest forks in the road when it comes to comparing these two in this way is the fact that Freddie Mercury was the frontman of a band and Michael Jackson was a solo artist. This distinction is important because Michael Jackson being the ''main attraction'' means that he didn't have to share any of the spotlight with three or four other bandmates, while Freddie did. For this reason Freddie's isolated vocal performances will always be left sounding a bit more empty in comparisons like this because his lines aren't as elaborate and he doesn't use as many backup vocalists, whereas Michael's songs are all quite a bit more vocal-oriented than Queen's. Both of these guys are absolute legends and always will be.
What are you talking about. MJ started off being a front man at 5. As for professional training, MJ was trained in his home with his mom, dad and brothers...they both great. But MJ came "RAW!"...from the streets to the King of Pop on pure talent...
Freddie ist und bleibt der beste🥰
A lot of the differences can be on simple things like the microphone they used and reverb
My friend you must to START to react Queen songs ! Lets start with Queen - Somebody To Love - HD Live - 1981 Montreal .
Thank you for your all work.We love you
Freddie never took singing lessons, he was absolutely untrained and he taught himself by listening to the great opera singers.
So does MJ
Off topic, I’ve seen some posts lately from a “Just the Voice Backup!”. I haven’t watched any of them but they are your old reaction videos. Was wondering if it was you or someone impersonating you for views. Anyway, love Freddie, Michael, and this video. Thanks!
Micheal.
MJ 👑 of MUSIC.
Go Michael
Freddie all the way
I appreciate Freddie Mercury effort into his voice but Mj was a vocal delivery genius and his lyrics where 🔥
Freddie is insane but you see mike....
I just feel like Mike pours his heart out into every note he sings.
MJ👑....Is.....the best in the world....in the space👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
First!
Welcome!
2 amazing icon legends
MiCHAEL.JACKSON.!!
Michael 😍💞
Freddie Mercury was the best. He was also the one who wore "one sequined glove" first. Freddie Mercury wore one glove in 1975 in the video "Liar." Michael liked the one glove look of Freddy so he copied it in the 80s. Michael Jackson also was not the first to do the Moonwalk. The first was Bill Bailey at the Apollo in 1955 and the second was Jeffrey Daniel in 1982 who taught it to Michael Jackson.
Both legends, but Freddie easily.
i must say "Happy New Year!"
mj is the king of kings forever
Do the second part!
Please do part 2
Both are legendary!!! Freddie is #1 to me!
Just happy Freddy sang Queen songs and MJ his songs lol.. such different styles that it's hard to compare them
Can you react to Mariah Carey vs Beyonce who runs and riffs
Can you react to Leandrea Jonson Memphis 2017
i find freddie’s vibrato a little unsteady, and i prefer mj’s tone
Little Micheal Jackson would have beat him
Def not
A lot of the Queen harmonies was often the whole band (well 3 of them) singing!
only micheal ❤❤❤❤❤
This wasn't a really good video to react to, it felt slightly one sided. They didn't really give Michael Jackson's voice justice but they had put more effort on Freddie's part, regardless, my opinion is that I think Michael is slightly better...His voice is extremely strong even though he's really soft spoken in shy. He has good stamina and I believe that Michael never took vocal lessons when he started the Jackson 5. If I remember correctly, at 5 years old he didn't have any vocal training, just like he didn't have any training for dancing. Michael has this amazing grit and in his voice overall you can hear more power, emotion, and passion. It's slightly annoying on how people like to underestimate his voice. People haven't just heard some of his rare or unnoticed songs. People claim that Michaels singing voice is soft compare to Freddie's but that is not at all the case. MJ's voice is actually more powerful, and no matter what anyone's opinion is they have to agree on that. Michael's voice fits in the rock and roll and rock genre, his grit and aggressive screams are out of this world. If you listen to come together, dirty diana, and so on...I think most would agree that Michaels voice was made for rock and roll. But yeah, I just think Michael is better overall. His voice has something that Freddie doesn't.
Where have you been?
Please react to MJ Chicago please
No comparison for me, they are both great! No classical training for Freddie, he's an all around phenomenon!!💖💖
MJ nota 10
Though both were probably the most theatrical on-stage performers in ALL of history, Michael's were more dance-based and rehearsed while Freddie's were more vocal-based and improvised. This is most clearly seen with what they ventured into later on in their careers. Michael lip-synced more to focus on the choreography, while Freddie took up opera. What I will say is Baby Mike was sustaining them Bb5s in belt. Both kings/queens of background vocals and sheer musicality.
Would You Rather Be Queen Of Rock Or King Of Pop? I Cant Choose
A Rap God, even better
Ahh i see your point aswell
Freddie usually sing apella
MJ was fan mercury
Mj goat
Michael siempre peleando no por su raza peleando contra el mundo 🌎 no importa el color
Feel like Freddy's voice is better with the music...
MJ got better vocals & a way wider range plus he was more versatile He’s The Greatest Singer Of All Time FOREVER!👑✨💯(They could’ve picked way better songs than this tho for MJ vocal wise)
Freddie's Vocal range is officially bigger, but I believe Michael could go higher than Freddie just because he had a high voice in general. More versatile in what way? Freddie sang in more genres than Michael and Freddie failed absolutely non of them. And they could've picked better songs for both of em, they always go for the popular stuff.
@@ben1ben WRONG! Your Delusional🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@Milkers777 You're*. You are just like the people that call MJ a pedo do you realize that? I speak facts here and you come back with absolutely nothing but insults just because you can't agree with reality. Freddie's Vocal range is F2-F#6 and Michael's is F#2-C-6. Freddie sang Rock, Blues, Rhythm and blues, Speed Metal, Gospel, Middle Eastern, Opera, Pop, Medieval, Progressive, Country, Disstrack, Ragtime, Acoustic, Ballads, Funk, Rockabilly, Soul Rock, Disco, Heavy Metal, Orchestral, Cultural and Dance. Now come back with a valid argument as to where my points are wrong kid.
@@Milkers777 You are an embarrassment for Michael Jackson fans. Ben ben just answered statements that you have claimed, that are not true in reality. He did not even involve his opinion into this nor did he state who he favors, he just said how it is. Freddie sang in more genres than Michael which makes him more versatile and his range on paper is bigger or as you said wider than Michaels. While he also mentions that he thinks Michael can sing higher than Freddie but had never actually done it. The Delusional and wrong one is you.
@@ben1ben Um! it is not that deep first off MJ was & will always be Innocent also Freddie is highly overrated he is not discussed amongst the greatest vocalist like MJ always is tbh and i tried being nice but here we go...These desperate Mercury fans trying to seek relevance under literally every comment section. Listen and listen carefully once and for all. Freddie Mercury is in no way, shape or form the greatest male vocalist of all time. Not by technique. Not by range. And most definitely not by versatility. Lmfao. Poor old rock singer. That's the only genre he conquered. His pathetic mere attempt at Opera was a joke. And Queen's attempt at a disco album, "Hot Space" was a global commercial failure. Their own fans disowned Mercury after that record. Learn the difference between singing in a genre and proving yourself in that genre. Michael Jackson has a 4 Octave Range and could easily reach 5 octaves. Michael Jackson proved himself in every genre of music from pop, rock, r&b, disco, funk, new jack swing, hard-rock, soul, you name it. Michael Jackson is a child prodigy. Michael Jackson has been singing "soul" songs since he was 5 years old.
Mercury is in every way shape and form, the most overrated male vocalist of all time. For the 0 intellect bots, who say he commanded the stage. Yea, running around topless with a microphone stand, is not what you call commanding the stage. What a joke. I could name a hundred singers better than Mercury. Steve Perry alone takes it by miles. Robert Plant, Luther Vandross etc. you name em. Go back to your Queen hole and worship Mercury.
P.S, It is a global known fact that Mercury was a sex, alcohol and coke addict who shared his bed with men. THAT IS FACTS!🎯💯💯💯
MJ I'd more soul and Freddy is more classical
Freddie Mercury wasn't vocally trained
Michael easy , especially raw vocals. Freddie doesn’t sing better than mike or sound better acapella
Freddie's vocals are very overrated. I don't fine them very pleasant to listen to.
Same! I agree very mediocre vocals MJ is The Greatest Singer/Vocalist Of All Time! The Top 3 Of All Time Are MJ,Whitney & Luther Vandross🌟
Same
I find MJ very overrated, an average singer at best.
@@jpw6893 Your just a hater dawg nobody cares what u think lol!🤡🤡
@@Milkers777 I don't care what you think. I don't care if you don't care if I think MJ is below average.
You're just biased because you're a super fan of MJ, if you dig deeper on Queen catalog you"ll see MJ was an average singer
Lol ok.
I don’t see him biased, he reacted fairly and good.