Ibn Taymiyya said: "People know that there has been, between the Hanbalis and Ash‘aris, much alienation and animosity. I was of those who strove my utmost to reconcile the hearts of the Muslims and sought to unify their ranks, in emulation of the [divine] command to hold fast to the Rope of Allah. I removed much of the alienation which existed in the hearts and clarified that al-Ash‘ari was one of the noblest of the discursive theologians (mutakallimun) to have ascribed themselves to Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him" (Majmu Fatawa) Ibn Qudamah joined the army of Sultan Saladin, the Ash'ari, to fight against the crusaders. If Ibn taymiyya and ibn qudama were able to strive for muslim unity, why cant you? The ummah today is in a worse Situation than back then! May Allah guide us all.
Ibn Taymiyyah worked with Asharis to fight shias who sneak in bida with sufism. Also Saudis and Salafis aid many forgieners, they took in millions of refugees from yemen, syria, Palestine, rohinngya etc and give dawa at hajj. But we have to unite on truth as hadiths say we can't unite on falsehood & us being the last ummah can be linked to that i imagine.
2 words for you : Stop laying. + Al ashari repented and died as a salafi ,he even wrote his famous book exposing ahlu lkalaam.Also,what you've said about ibnu taimia and ibnu qudama make no sense,and even if we agree that it happened as you claim for the sake of argument,it still doesn't stand as a proof to support your ignorance for many many reasons..Go learn how to study Islam and stop barking against it's scholars (know your place better for you)..
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Ibn Taymiyya did believe in unity with asharis. So was he misguided? The hadith that the ummah doesnt unite on falsehood means that whatever the ummah agrees upon is true, not that we cant have unity with different sects.
@@brownlaytte317 Salafis didnt exist prior to Ibn Abdul-wahhab. Not even Ibn Taymiyya was a salafi. He was a hanbali sufi Who followed the qadiri tariqa. And you are the ones Who Bark against the ten thousands of scholars Who were asharis and sufis.
Talking too much is not good. Let the scholars share their studies. It does not fit us to talk about matters we don't know about. Even scholars don't want to talk. The most what they say is Allahu 'Alam, because they fear Allah and don't want to make errors. That's the light they shine. May Allah bless our scholars and grant them success in spreading the truth!
When a great scholar "Mohaddith ul asr" as stated by the scholars of Islam give his advise and some fools still dare to open their big mouths even thou they don't even know how to do wodo properly,then every logical person understand why the Muslim Ummah has gone down like this.
Assalamo aleykom. It is seems you don't know the reality about about this "great scholar"...... Albani spreading jahiliyya practice : he said that a woman can breastfeed a stranger man directly from her body..... astaghfiro Allah ! in Arabic, his fatwa : th-cam.com/video/V_-smHaohFI/w-d-xo.html
@Eraf Mohammodiy Assalamo aleykom, mu dear brother. I love you in God. Would you accept that a Muslim lady gives her breast to a stranger, as recommanded by this "great scholar" ? Are you really interested by the teachig of our noble religion ?
@Eraf Mohammodiy "And whatever the Messenger has given you - take; and what he has forbidden you - refrain from. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is severe in penalty." (Surat Al-Hashr : 7) In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims. It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state.in Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206: Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman: The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state." So it is very clear that we must not stray with deviant groups like Neo-Salafis and Ahbash.
@@boras3547 you're must've been followers muhammad needs hijab, watch throne in the throat youtube channel, they expose hijab lies againts Albani Rahimahullah
Ibn Taymiyyah states [Majmū ‘l-Fatāwā 3/227-229]: “People know there was alienation and animosity between the Hanbalīs and the Asharīs. I was of those who strived to reconcile the Muslims’ hearts and unify them, in emulation of the command to hold fast to Allāh’s Rope. I removed most of the alienation that existed in the hearts. I clarified that al-Asharī was one of the most noble of the speculative theologians (Mutakallimūn) [...] And when I publicised the words of al-Asharī and the Hanbalīs saw it, they said, “This is better than the words of Shaykh al-Muwaffaq [Ibn Qudāmah]!” The Muslims rejoiced at the unification of the ranks. I publicized what Ibn Asākir stated in his virtues (Manāqib) [of al-Ash’arī] that “the Hanbalīs and the Asharīs were united until the time of al-Qushayrī”, for when the [well-known] controversy (Fitnah) took place in Baghdad, it caused disunity, and it is known that every group has followers who are [both] upright and astray.” How far away these "Salafis" are from Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya! The scholars of Ahl al-Hadith/Atharis always united with Asharis when it was necessary to defend muslim countries and community. Like Ibn Qudamah who entered Saladin Ayyubis army to fight the crusaders.
Assalamao aleykom. Sufis like Salahuddin were great people. They fighted to give freedom to the people. Ans we can compare with how salafo-wahabis are complices of colonialism. th-cam.com/video/h7fF0y4lCqI/w-d-xo.html
@@boras3547 Salahudin executed sufis. you psudeo Sunni sufi s who follwo shi'as with bida like mawlid teach shirk while Tawhid is linked to security in Quran 24 :55!, it is you who help colonies
A big issue is the lack of a Khalifa. The abolishment of the khalifa in a sense could be classified as bidah as it is something that existed since the Prophet PBUH. It was possible to have unity under the Khalifa as it represented the Muslims and would be responsible to ensure that the truth was enforced and Muslims didn't deviate and separate. Unfortunately the creation of sects is inevitable
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers. - funny you call Madkhalis ahl bida when Quran 49 :11 says don't give nicknames & you can't show their errors, & you accuse of taghoot loving but you support late secular Uthmanis.
Allah has tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55... We have to implement Tawhid and Quran 13 :11 says Allah doesn't change our condition until we change ourselves, so we have to return to our din Islam and unite on it and teach it.
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers. No I was asking for verifiable proof, just remember you get sins when you lie, and you lied on tafsir, defender secular Uthmanis so who really likes taughut, and acted ignorant of the Istiwa of Allah which is basic Islam, you have alot to learn before speaking on it, go learn sunna over jahmi psuedo Ashari bida and dont waste time like you done before.
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers. Where did you provide evidence? So you lie again? The more you sin the more you show only you really follow taughut.
He himself never made extravagant claims about his self or his abilities like many others, he (may Allah SWT reward him) never gave himself grand titles like sooo many people do today, he was humble and excellent in character, if you observed him you saw the sunnah manifesting itself from his actions words and deeds. He was a scholar who contributed a great deal of Khair but he was not free from errors. Was he a mujaddid? Only Allah SWT knows this. May Allah reward our dear sheikh.
Assalamo aleykom. In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims. It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state.in Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206: Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman: The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
The Sheikh's reply does not answer the question IMO. Was Salhudin not Ashari & the Muslims (so called Sunnis at least) United behind him & were not the Afghan Mujahideen who defeated the Russians not Deobandi. Sometimes you have to unite with others whom call themselves Sunni, to protect your existence.🤷🏾♂️🤔
says john smith..sorry..but those khawaarij have existed long before even your jahmiyyah kind...there are THOUSANDS of soofi taariqat worldwide and the most IRONIC part of it all is each soofi "master" of each taariqa claims his taariqa is the way to Allaah azza wa jal and all others are no good.. repent and stick to the authentic sunnah
You are a Jahil and talk nonsense. Show me one Qadiri shaykh, who says that other Tariqas are astray. Show me one Shadili shaykh who says this! Show me one Naqshibandi Shaykh saying this! Btw your Scholars like Ibn Qudamah, Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Qayyim, Dhahabi etc. were all in favor of sufism and practiced it themself.
lalala lölölö *Hanfi and Shafi fought, they killed each other.. Now days Deobandi Sufi Naqshabandi Hanfi and Barelwi Hanfi are fighting, they are not ready to pray behind Deobandi Naqshabandi Hanfi... LOL*
Allah preserved fiqh through the fuqaha, and Ihsan through the sufies, Hadith through Muhaditheen, Tafsir through mufassarin and Aqida through sunni mutakilmeen (schlolars of aqida) the Asharis and Maturidis. The Asharis confronted the heretics and smashed their arguments, upheld and defended the Aqida of Rasul Allah (PBUH) and Sahabas. Ibn Hajar Haytami Al Makki says, "know that Ahusunnah wal Jama'ah are Ash'aris and Maturidis" All major scholars were either ash'ari or Maturidi in Aqida.
You both are stray and leading astray. All scholars (including Hanbalis) agree that Sufism is from the Sunnah. Imam Dhahabi says about his teacher Al-Musali: "He was devout, good, a Sufi (mutasawwif) and someone who abstained from what is unlawful." Ibn Taymiyya writes: "some people criticised Sufiyya and Tasawwuf and they said they were innovators, out of the Sunnah, but the truth is they are striving in Allah's obedience" (Majmu Fatawa) Ibn Qayyim: "We can witness the greatness of the People of Sufism, in the eyes of the earliest generations of Muslims" (Manazil as-Sa'ireen) Imam Shafi'i says: "Be both) a faqih and a sufi: do not be only one of them" (Diwan al-Shafi'I)
Very common mistake. Just because you practice Tasawwuf doesn't mean you are a Sufi. Perhaps linguistically, but it does not put you in a sect. Without Tasawwuf, there is no Islam, and this is a fact. There has to be some level of spirituality. However, to place of the Sufiyyah in one group...Laa! How is this so? Just because one wishes to practice Tasawwuf to a greater extent does not mean he wishes to do it in a manner that puts him out from the folds of Islam. Yes, there is going to be a Mubtadi', or many of them, but not all Sufiyyah are so. It is wrong to class all of them as one, as you cannot class all blacks as criminals because a large percentage of them have committed crime, hypothetically speaking. As to how one should practice Tasawwuf, Allah has given us that in Qur'an and Sunnah, no doubt, and to follow other than that and to make up things, to innovate for the sake of 'spirituality' is but a load of garbage, and there our entire 'Aqeedah would differ. In Muhammad (SAW) Sunnah, and in the Qur'an, there are more than enough Du'aa and Dhikr to make, so many ways to be closer to Allah, just as how he has given us five Salawaat, each with their specific ways to pray it, not left us to worship him as we will. Let's be content with the Qur'an and Sunnah, for no doubt in it is the best of guidance, and to deny that is nothing but blasphemous actions, may Allah guide us all.
Al Albani and psudo salafi are misguided. Sayyidina Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (68 AH) Ibn Abbas and the Companions of the Prophet, sallahu alayhi wa salam: Concerning the verse, “The day that a Shin will be laid bare,” (Quran 68:42) Ibn Abbas interpreted the “shin” to mean “severity.” Commenting on this verse, Imam al Tabari said, “A group of the Prophet’s companions and their disciples, and the people of figurative interpretation have said, ‘He will uncover a severe matter.’ And among those who interpreted the shin to mean ‘severity’ from the Imams of Quranic exegesis are Mujahid, Said Bin Jubayr, Qataba and others. Allah be He exalted said, ‘And the sky we built with hands. And it is We who give expanse.’ (Quran 51:47). Ibn Abbas said concerning it: “With strength.” (Tafsir al Tabari) That is, “We built it with strength.” -- { يَوْمَ يُكْشَفُ عَن سَاقٍ وَيُدْعَوْنَ إِلَى ٱلسُّجُودِ فَلاَ يَسْتَطِيعُونَ } “On a day when shin shall be exposed, they shall be ordered to prostrate, but be unable” (Qur’an 68:42) It shows that the great Sahabi, Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas actually made ta’wil (figurative interpretation) of this word. It is also a rebuttal to those who disputed its authenticity. Ta’wil of ‘Saaq’ from Ibn Abbas: Read Here -- "...The Holy Prophet(s) said: May Allah grant him (Ibn Abbas) deep understanding of religion." [Sahih Muslim Book :031, Hadith No.6055] Sa`ad ibn Abi Waqqas said, Ibn Abbas would speak and Umar would not disregard what he had to say.” -- Ibn Abbas said, “I am of those well grounded in knowledge, who know the meaning (of the allegorical verses).” [Imam Suyuti, Itqan, Vol: 2, page, 4] To the fake hanbalis- Ibn al-Jawzi: “You have made this madhhab such a shameful disgrace that when it is said, “Humbali,” it is understood that he is someone who likens GOD to His creation. You have then made your way to be that of bigotry and intolerance, showing fanatical support for Yazid ibn Muawiyyah, when you well know that the founder of the madhab permitted cursing him”. (Ibn al Jawzi rejected and repudiated Yazid for his behavior) And, Abu Muhammed Tamimi used to say about one of your imams that: “[he] has disgraced the madhhab in a terrible way and it will not be cleansed until the day of resurrection.” [Daf` Shubah al-Tashbih bi Akuff al-Tanzih]
if there is evidence something should be interpreted then thats different but if none its taken at Face Value like seeing Allah's Face in Heaven or Seeing Allah in judgement day! Surah Qiyama says we wll see Allah! also
“When the people of Paradise enter Paradise, Allah - may He be blessed and exalted - will say: ‘Do you want anything more?’ They will say: Have You not made our faces bright? Have You not admitted us to Paradise and saved us from Hell?’ Then the veil will be removed and they will not be given anything more beloved to them than looking at their Lord, may He be glorified and exalted.” Narrated by Muslim.
The Salaf took thing on their Thahir meaning unless their is proof from Quran and Sunnah! ***read this Abdur Rahman dot org , Foundations of the Sunnah (Usool-us-Sunnah) - Imam Ahmad - English Text **CHAPTER THREE SOME SAYINGS FROM THE SALAF CONCERNING ALLAAH’S ATTRIBUTES AND THEIR IJMAA’ (CONSENSUS) CONCERNING THE FALSEHOOD OF TA’WEEL - A REFUTATION OF THE ASH’ARIYYAH 133** Al-Awzaa’ee (d.157H) said, “I asked az-Zuhree and Makhool about the aayaat pertaining to the Sifaat (Attributes of Allaah), so they said, ‘Leave them as they are.” 134 lmaam Ahmad (d. 2.41] said, “These ahaadeeth should he left as they are ... ‘We affirm them and we do not make any similitude for them. This is what has been agreed upon by the scholars.” 136 Nu’aym ibn Hammaad (d. 228H) said, “Whoever makes tashbeeh (resemblance) of Allaah to his creation has committed kufr (disbelief). And whoever denies what Allaah has described Himself with has also committed kufr. Indeed, all that Allaah has described Himself with, or what His Messenger has described Him with - then there is no tashbeeh in it at all.” 137 **CHAPTER FOUR AFFIRMING THE SIFAAT WITH THEIR DHAAHIR (APPARENT) AND HAQEEQI (REAL) MEANING AND A REFUTATION THAT THE WAY OF THE SALAF WAS ALLEGEDLY TAFWEEDH 157 - A REFUTATION OF THE MUFAWWIDAH*** The Most Merciful has ascended over the Throne Soorah Taa-Haa (20):5 Muhammad ibn Yoosuf (one of the teachers of Imaam Bukhaaree) said, “The one who says that Allah is not over (‘aLa) His Throne is a kaafir. And the one who thinks that Allaah did not speak to Moses is a kaafir.” Khalq Af’aalul-’lbaad of Imaam al-Bukhaaree, no. 66. Imaam al-Bukhaaree (d. 256H) said, “Mujaahid (d. 104H) said about Istiwaa: ‘Rising over the Throne.” 161 Ibn Jareer at-Tabaree (d. 310H) said concerning the saying of Allaah, the Most High: “The Most Merciful made Istiwaa over the Throne.” 162 meaning: ‘Rising above and Ascending. 163 Al-Khattaabee (d. 388H) said, “The madhhab of the Salaf (the Pious Predecessors) with regard to the Sifaat (Attributes of Allah) is to affirm them as they are ‘alaa dhaahir (with their apparent meaning), negating any tashbeeh (resemblance) to them, not takyeef (asking how they are).” 169
Allah says - translation of the meaning- : {The Most Gracious Rose (Istawa) above the Throne} [20:5] Ibn Jarir At-Tabari (d. 310 H.) said: “and His saying {Adh-Dhahir}, He is saying: And He is dhahir over everything below Him, and He is High above everything, nothing is higher than Him. {Al-Batin} He is saying: and He is the batin of everything, nothing is nearer to anything than Him, as He said: {And We are nearer to him than his jugular vein} [50:16].” (2) - Hadith of the slave girl: Mu’awiyah as-Sahmi reported: «I had some sheep which I kept between Uhud and Juwaniyyah with a slave girl... I said, "Messenger of Allah! Shall I free her (as an expiation of my sin.) He said ”Call her over.“ When I did, he asked her: **”Where is Allah? She said: "fi as-sama (above the Heavens)" ** Then he asked her, ”Who am I ?“ She said: "The Messenger of Allah -Sallallahu alahi wa Sallam-". Thereupon, the **Messenger of Allah - Sallallahu alahi wa Sallam- ordered me, ”Free her for she is a believer.“** [Saheeh Muslim] 1. Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq (radhi allahu anhu): Abdullah Ibn Umar -May Allah be pleased with him- reported: “When the Messenger of Allah - Sallallahu Alaihi wa-Sallam- passed away, Abu Bakr - May Allah be pleased with him- ascended the minbar, praised Allah and said: «O people ! if Muhammad was your god whom you worship then your god has died, and if your God is the one above the heaven (fis-sama') then your God did not die. Then he recited: {Muhammad is not but a messenger. (Other) messengers have passed on before him. So if he was to die or be killed, would you turn back on your heels (to unbelief)?…} [3:144]’ until he completed the ayah.» (1) Its isnad (chain) is hasan. 2. Abdullah Ibn Masud -May Allah be pleased with him- said: «Between the lowest heaven and the one after it is the distance of five hundred years, and between every two heavens is the distance of five hundred years, and between the seventh heaven and the Kursi is the distance of five hundred years, and between the Kursi and the water is the distance of five hundred years, and the Throne (Arsh) is above the water, Allah the Almighty is above the Throne (fawqa Al-Arsh). And nothing is hidden from Allah of your deeds.» And in another narration «He knows what you are upon». Its grading is: hasan. (2)
3. Abu Hanifah An-Nu`man (d. 150 H.) : At-Tahawi said in “Al-Aqeedah At-Tahawiyah”, in which he wrote the beliefs of Imam Abu Hanifah and his two companions: Abu Yusuf and Muhammad bin Al-Hasan : “And the Throne and Kursi.are true, and He is independent from the Throne and what is beneath it, He encompasses everything (? Is above it.” His saying: “And Is Above it” meaning: “He is above everything” is affirmation of the elevation of Allah Azza wa Jal above all of creation, including the Throne. And his saying in another section of the book: “Nor is He contained by the six directions as all created things are.” Is a negation of the creations’ encompassing of Allah -Azza wa Jal- , for the “He is not contained by the six directions” that is creation, He is above the six directions and all creation. This is a reply to the Hulooliyah and Jahmiyyah who said that Allah is in His creation, and that He is everywhere - Exalted is Allah above that-. It was also narrated in al Fiqh Al-Akbar that Imam Abu Hanifah said: “Whoever says: ‘I do not know if Allah is above the heaven or on earth’, then he has disbelieved, Allah Ta`ala said: {The Most Gracious over the Throne Istawa (Rose)}; If he then says: ‘I do say this ayah but I don’t know if the Throne is above the heaven or on earth’ then he has disbelieved too.” (3) And that is because in both statements he is doubting Allah’s elevation, him not knowing if Allah is above His creation or not. And in it is also the belief in the possibility of Allah being inside His creation -Exalted is Allah above that- . So by that he is denying the Islamic texts, and believing in the permissibility of Allah residing in His creation, and both (4) are kufr (disbelief).
Assalamo aleykom. I love all of you in God. In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims. It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state.in Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206: Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman: The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
@@boras3547 neo salafis? Salafi dawah is the dawah based on Quran and Sunnah and linked to Hanbalis and Imam Ahmad was upon the truth when he was in the minority and he was called the jammat and compared to abu Bakr.
@@boras3547 jamma doesn't mean majority, jamma means groups. you either don't know Arabic or lost. Uthmani/Ottomons were Ashari at 1st & due to bida of Tawil left door open for cult batiniya sufiya shia & even infiltrations by masonry young turks who are said to be crypto judeos, fit in due to all bida & lying on Islam. they even allowed being a h()m(). Which is why teaching all 4 mathabs are salafi as Sheikh Albani Rahimahullah compiled their sayings in his book Prophets's Prayer is important - it creates what Islam being a preserved religion is meant to do unite on clear transparent proof as the Prophet peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you. they Young T pushed oppression on Hashemites modern Jordan who were tricked by the judeo masons outside of Turk, the ones in uk with promise of Palestine. Rothschild banking family owns the israeli occupation and they had a banking synasty in uk and in else where. both the rothschild and the young t have a common father in crypto judeo dajjal , an actual dajjal who said he was a messiah in sabatei zevi! So the civil war with Uthmani Ottomons took place in ww1, uk backed Jordan hashemites of west Arabia were tricked out of the Palestine Land and Saudis of East Arabia protected Mecca and Medina from Hashemites of Jordan betrayed by uk. Nonetheless I pray turks and indian sufis return to the Tawhid and Sunnah!
@@boras3547 Also watch this : Refuting the "Hadith of Najd" argument against Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab Najd during Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum's time lke with Salim bin Abdullah bin Umar was iraq. theres a place in USa named mecca, do we do hajj there no! Also Ibn Abdul Wahab is from tamimi tribe which is said to be hardest on dajjal, lastly his books are available teaching basic Tawhid and the proofs of him reviving the sunnah like Sheikh Albani is right there! Tawhid is linked to safety - Quran 24,55. sufi & shia went way of Quran 9,31 rabbis & priests grave worship & mawlid bida like christmas. Shirk leads to colonies in hadiths like in sufi lands imitating shias. bida divides umma who reunited on secularism like christians. Islam is perfect, honor Islam, by not mixing in bida, Follow sunna ilm & you will get victory and unity! Start with Tawhid! Also Prophet peace & blessings on him said my ummah will divide into 73 sects all in the hell fire except 1, those who are upon what me and my companions are upon! Also there will always be a group in my ummah open and victorious on the truth. This is Manhaj Salafi, Ahlul Hadith same mathhab of the 4 imams who all said return to the Prophet peace and blessings on him and all imams should teach this. guys watch this video by Sheikh Albani : The Term 'Wahhaabi' And The Reason For Its Propagation By The Ottoman Empire - british feared Salafi revival in india through Saudis so they pushed ottomons to fight them while funding sufi preistly division. clarify a few key points, call ppl to the scholars small simple books it makes all the difference. Make the dawa easy for you and others! why are ppl lying about Islam and the scholars including deviant Sufis Yasir ikwani Qadhi, clearing the name of scholars is among the greatest ways to clarifying Islam! Modern terrorism goes back to shia marxist sayyed qutub whose stamp is in Iran, and used for the 79 cia revolt where the original jet bombers who took in exiled al queda are. then shia agents like chalabi lied on iraq wmds with israelis, shiasm returning to their judeo roots. kawarij are not Sunnis but linked to shias and sufis and others!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 In the famous book "Al Aqeeda Attahawya", Imam Tahway exposed the Aqeed of the Salaf Salih : Allah without limits, nor corners, nor body and not concerned by the six directions «تـعـالى - أي الله - عن الحدود والغــــــــايـــــــات والأركان والأعضـاء والأدوات لا تحـويــــــه الجهــــــاتُ السـِتُّ كسائر المبتَدَعات »
If you look at the history of Islam, victories were given to Muslims who were either Ashari or Maturidi ( to give an example Mehmet of the Ottoman empire who was a maturidi and a Sufi who conquered Constantinople and also Salahuddin (most likely Ashari since most of shafis are)...I think this modern salafi movement is the disease in the ummah since its arrival, Islam as a force has gone downhill. Please name me a Salafi Leader or army that has conquered anything??? I'll wait........
Ok...the salaf are the sahaba down to the umayyad to some of abbasid down to the latest one salafi saudis who driven the ahlus bid'a was shirk regime (soofi ashharee) who told you that salahuddin al ayyobi is soofi or ashari?
@@yasserzain1521 this is absolute rubbish. Ashari and maturidi have always been the majority amongst the Muslims. Salafis/wahabis are about 2 hundred years old and are still the minority. Saudis drove out the ahlul bidah? Do you mean they revolted against the Ottomans who conquered so much land for Islam. What happened after they 'drove out the ahlul bidah'? Oh yeah, the Muslims lands had lines drew through it.. Like I said pseudo salafis are a fitna to this ummah.
@@SajidAli-ip7ov the most followed and influential Muslim country is saudi..yeah you belong to the majority of 72 sects where to be thrown in jahannam as prophet SAW said.
@@yasserzain1521 how is Saudi the most followed and influencial? It's only influencial because of petrol dollars, by which they can print copies of literature and send it out to the Muslim world. How do you know I'm going to jahannam? Are you judging in matters only Allah judges in? That's the problem with you salafis, you have no mercy in your hearts and are quick to throw people in jahannam and place yourselves in Jannah. How deluded.
Saying Ashari and Maturidi is misguided is saying 95% of Sunni Muslims are misguided. I agree with many of the Wahhabi teachings such as their opposition to seeking mediators to Allah, but saying Ashari or Maturidi creed is misguided and going to hell itself is misguided. I think Salafi creed is excess in anthropomorphism. Remember both Ibn Taimiyyah (Salafi founder) and Ibn Hajar al Asqalani (an Ash'ari) had great respect for each other even though they differed in many of their opinions. Then how can we call each other kafir?
The prophet said all groups are going to hell except for ONE so that means very clearly that not all groups were muslims only the one that made it to jannah were Muslims....... The others called themselves muslims but had problems which lead them to jahannam..... So the sheikh here is not saying that we are all one(sufis and shias and maturidees) because we all know that sufis are veey different from sunnis and shias are very different from maturidees and so on.... Most groups that have come up have very major problems and are unexpectable As for asharis... Imam nawawi was one and some other great scholars were..... We unite with the ones whose differences are not unexpectable according to the quran and sunnah
The Prophet (saw) did not say that the other 72 sect are in hell forever. He just said they are in hell. Some muslims will enter hell and then come back to jannah. So even shias etc can be muslims. Many great scholars were ash'aris, maturidis or sufis. Ibn taymiyya and ibn qayyim were sufis. Muhammad al fatih Who conquered constantinople was a maturidi.
@@hsdjsdshdhsdnsmsd6247 there are 2 types of sufism, one that does zuhud in dunya and thats ok, but others did so much zuhud they didn't learn the din, and reunited on ignorance and imam extremism and even jinn usage. imam extremism likely led to their shirk as this was the foundation of shirk in Nuh the first MEssenger Alehas Salam's time. and sufis also imitated many shia bidas like mawlid and grave worship, and holy spirit type inspiration and bidas. sufis and shias are the preists and rabbis of the ummah with theri bida and their christmas style mawlid taking centuries to form like christmas shirk is very clear indication of that and betrayal of the sunnah of the Prophet peace and blessings on him's comman on his death bed don't go to extreme with me and mix masjids with graves like the ahlul kitab did.
@@hsdjsdshdhsdnsmsd6247 Ibn Taymiyyah & Ibn Qayyum were Hanbalis though and salafi, not modern sufis who use ABu Hanifah for fiqh and reject Imam Ashari who became an Ashari at the end of his life and wrote al ibanah!
@@Abu__Maryam yes there was a small things that they agree with a sharia like the attributes of allah the aqiidah Example imaamu Nawawi he made a (Ta’wil) in attributes of allah But before he death he repented and said I was I wrong He was a salafi رحمه الله He just made a ijtihad And a prophet scw said in a saheeh hadeeth On the authority of Amr ibn al-Aas - may God be pleased with him - that he heard the Messenger of God - may God’s prayers and peace be upon him - say: “If the ruler makes a judgment, then he strives hard and then becomes correct, then he is rewarded two reward and if he rules, then he strives hard, and then makes a mistake, he also will rewarded but one reward
A self-made "muhaddith". A Teach-Yourself "scholar". A "no-teacher" muhaddith. In spite of the consensus of Hadith Scholars, he has the gut to categorized the Hadiths of Imam Bukhari as "sahih" and "weak" - better than authentic scholars of Islam. When in fact he himself is a "fabricated" muhaddith. He is one of the creators of the "salafi" sect, the greatest fitna in modern history of Islam. Is he a Sheik-ul Hadith? A hafiz? God knows really how many hadith he knows by heart.
So you say he is self taught? Laa Ba's. Most would agree that the *general* case is one should study formally. And then there are exceptions. But the problem is when people neglect his qualifications. When it comes to his Qur'an recitation, anyone who knows Tajweed could see he has a good foundation. Memorywise, from his lectures alone. As for aHadith, his qualifications so as to where he studied and how he studied does not matter. Not that you or I, or any other layman could dream of achieving what he did in his 30+ years of serious studies throughout the Middle East. But the fact of the matter is, yes, he was kicked from Madinah University(political matters), but years later, they acknowledged him, awarded him, and offered to hire him as the *Professor of Higher Education* in the University. Technically speaking, Madinah University acknowledged him to be qualified on that level, so to say he has no qualifications is nothing more than the words of either a fool, and arrogant hater, or an ignoramus. Speak only of that which will benefit you, and only that which you have knowledge of, Akhi.
On a side not, he didn't even differ in the grading of more than 10 aHadith from Saheeh al Bukhari, and if I'm correct pertaining to the exact number, 6 aHadith. For starters, many other scholars before him did the same thing, so to say he is unprecedented in that matter would be a lie. From among them are the names of Daruqutni, Hafidh ibn Hajar, and many others. Imaam ash-Shaafi'i is quoted to have said, 'Allah has chosen to allow no book perfection other than the Qur'an'. So it is blasphemous to say that Saheeh al-Bukhari is perfect, and Imaam al Bukhari, as great and noble was he, was only a man, flawed and imperfect. It is for such reasons we take from Imaam Muslim, Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, Ahmad, Shaafi'i, and a great deal of other Muhadditheen as well. Shaykh al Albaani did it in a respectful manner, and as he said, was only to be a part of the process in the perfection of such a great work. He held no ill will to Bukhari in doing so; rather, the very opposite!
@@@mukhtarally9667 - As I said, the concensus among Islamic scholars (Muhaddiths and Others) is that all the hadiths in Sahih al Bukhari are "Sahih". This is a fact. Is Albani using his own self -made methodology or is it following a certain acknowledged methodology? God knows. He does not have any formal education. Most of his time has been spent in the Library in Damascus doing self "research". To acknowledge, say a Doctor, he has to produce his certificates/degrees. Will you go to such a doctor with no degree, with no recognition? Certainly not. Can Al-Bani produce his Sanad that goes up to the Prophet? No. Then on what basis we call his a Scholar of Hadith? An Authoritative Scholar? Just because he has written some books? Regarding his return to Saudi Arabia after his ban (not a political issue but due to his lack of respect for the Prophet (SAW)) you should know his relation with Baaz, another proponent of the Salafi Sect. Albani has misled the Ummah to such an extent that he has created one of the greatest fitnah - the Salafi Sect - in the muslim community. One of his greatest blunder in Islam is his -8-rakaats tarawih. - and we call his a "scholar" !!!
@@abdoolrasheed7842 The first statement you make you make is false, and you really should back up your claim with some proof. There is no consensus that *all* of the aHadith in Jaami' Saheeh Al-Bukhari are Saheeh, as it is a compilation book of Hadeeth put together by a man. If it were not for that, Haafidh ibn Hajar and others would not have criticized certain aHaadeeth in it. One can say that it is the *most* authentic book after the Quran, but not that it is *completely* authentic. As to whether he followed a certain methodology, that he did, and many scholars of aHaadeeth used Hikmah and knowledge to determine the authenticity of a Hadeeth on their own. And thus, while Abu Dawood may grade a Hadeeth as Sahih or Hasan, Ibn Maajah may grade it as Da'if. Nevertheless, if you did not know his methodology, why speak of it, or even for that matter, bring it up unless you wish to learn of it? To proceed. While the benefits of formal studies are many, they are not always necessary. It might depend on the time, place, environment, the individual, ect. If one holds the discipline and the resources at hand, then why not spread the knowledge you have? Yet, at the same time, where did you derive that he has *no* formal education? While it is true that I do not know of much of his formal studies, I do know that Ijaazaat fall under that category, and Ijaazaat he had. And the concept of being self-taught is actually not that foreign, considering that most of the work of a MA or PhD is like that. It is research, finding sources by yourself, doing the work by *yourself*. If you look at the lives of our righteous predecessors, and the 'Ulamaa of the past, many of them did not study formally, especially pointing out that there were not many areas for so-called formal studying. They might read, do their research, learn from a teacher here, then from there, from one country to a next, from one region to another. And on the fact of him being a scholar, regardless of who calls him a scholar, he never did so himself, rather, a *student* of knowledge. As you completely neglected my statement earlier, he *was* considered qualified, as the Islamic University of Madinah deemed him so, as well as others. If you would use that they kicked him out, then why not use the issue of them later on requesting him be the Professor of Higher Education? And on a side note, he *was* praised greatly by prominent Saudi scholars of Hadeeth such as Shaykh Al-Uthaymeen and others. As to lack of respect 'respect' is a relative term, and you have ye to produce what you mean by that. Unfortunately, I do not know what affair you speak of between him an Shaykh Ibn Baaz - please do inform me. Lastly, if you call the concept of Taraweeh being 8 raka'aat 'one of his greatest blunders in Islam', then I do not know what is minor and major anymore. It has been a controversial issue in Islam, so why use that of all things? Especially considering this Hadeeth... Volume 2, Book 21, Number 248 Jzk.
@@Epic Brah - The infernal trio, the devilish trio of the salafi Sect : Albani-Baaz-Uthaymeen. Here is his relation with Baaz.. (i) One thing is sure: there is no consensus among the modern scholars that Albani is a recognised Muhaddith. That he holds any authority in Hadith except among the Salafi Sect/Ahle Hadith Sect. (2) All of the Ulama of the past have got knowledge through recognised Teachers, many of whom were the compagnions of Sahabas. eg. The Hanafi fiqh is basically the teachings of Ibn Masud (R.A) and Ali (R.A)since both were settled in Kufa. All the 4 Imams had extensive training under the hands of Companions of Sahabas and/or prominent teachers of their time (This formal education of their time) - The Scholars of Hadith (Imam Safei/Imam Hambal/Imam Bukhari etc ) had close relationship with prominent pupils of Imam Abu Hanifa - so to say that these Scholars did not follow the Teach-Yourself methodology like Albani. Imam Bukhari would discuss hadith with his contemporaries like Imam Hambal (RA) , Yahya ibn Ma'in etc ... before including in his collection. (3) In spite of whatever hadith you quote, the Ummah has performed 20 rakaats of Taraawih until the emergence of the Ahle Hadith/Salafi Sect and their like. You think that these hadiths did not arrive to these prominent Scholars - then you are misquided. Even , inspite of so many difference with the Wahabi, 20 rakaats Taraawih are performed in the Masjid-e-Haram/Masjid-e-Nabawi (SAW). Sincere wish- Do not be like the Blind men and the Elephant www.allaboutphilosophy.org/blind-men-and-the-elephant.htm
Allah has punished the salafies/wahabies for deviating from the jama'h, look how the salafies have divided into subgroups and are now doing takfir on each other. Repent and return to Ahlussunnah Wal Jaam'ah.
God knows best. Defend Never Saudi goverment, but defend Islam, Mecca and Medina. Now they (the Saudis) built tall buildings in front of Muharram Mecca and Medina. Signs of the Judgment Day as the truthful M,uhammed ibn Abdullah said. ANDERSSON
ahmet03 You should know what Salaf means before puting yourself into shame. Salaf means "those before us". So it refers to the way of the sahaba of the messenger and the messenger Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam of Allah. And if this means that salaf stands for the way of the Sunnah of the Messenger then I am a salaf and I am proud to be a salaf. Unlike what you think and the media that brainwashed you. And remind yourself about the Hadith that the true Muslims. Those on the way of the Messenger of Allah will be very little in number. Maybe we are talking about just a thousand people or little bit more. And indeed, those who are not on the straight way, we have to warn about them and send them the message.
hbk711x Did you actually says that Saudis, who are the biggest puppets of Israel defend Al-Aqsa against zionists? Saudis unite with America, instead of uniting with palestine and other muslims!
Saudi government are the most evil people in the world. they destroy historical buildings of sahaba (ra) to make money, they throw Palestine and Syria under the bus to get America as their ally. saudi princes can murder, steal and do drugs but get no punishment because saudi arabia only practices shariah on poor people. Mecca and Medina were thousand years under the control of Sunnis (Maturidis/Asharis) and the Ummah did much better than today.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 91 | คู่เอก "คมอาวุธ vs อเล็กเซย์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V0RkEfYFsgM/mqdefault.jpg)
Ibn Taymiyya said: "People know that there has been, between the Hanbalis and Ash‘aris, much alienation and animosity. I was of those who strove my utmost to reconcile the hearts of the Muslims and sought to unify their ranks, in emulation of the [divine] command to hold fast to the Rope of Allah. I removed much of the alienation which existed in the hearts and clarified that al-Ash‘ari was one of the noblest of the discursive theologians (mutakallimun) to have ascribed themselves to Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him" (Majmu Fatawa)
Ibn Qudamah joined the army of Sultan Saladin, the Ash'ari, to fight against the crusaders.
If Ibn taymiyya and ibn qudama were able to strive for muslim unity, why cant you? The ummah today is in a worse Situation than back then! May Allah guide us all.
Ibn Taymiyyah worked with Asharis to fight shias who sneak in bida with sufism. Also Saudis and Salafis aid many forgieners, they took in millions of refugees from yemen, syria, Palestine, rohinngya etc and give dawa at hajj. But we have to unite on truth as hadiths say we can't unite on falsehood & us being the last ummah can be linked to that i imagine.
As Salaamu Alaikum Haqq May Allah Reward You Allahuma Ameen
2 words for you : Stop laying.
+ Al ashari repented and died as a salafi ,he even wrote his famous book exposing ahlu lkalaam.Also,what you've said about ibnu taimia and ibnu qudama make no sense,and even if we agree that it happened as you claim for the sake of argument,it still doesn't stand as a proof to support your ignorance for many many reasons..Go learn how to study Islam and stop barking against it's scholars (know your place better for you)..
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Ibn Taymiyya did believe in unity with asharis. So was he misguided? The hadith that the ummah doesnt unite on falsehood means that whatever the ummah agrees upon is true, not that we cant have unity with different sects.
@@brownlaytte317 Salafis didnt exist prior to Ibn Abdul-wahhab. Not even Ibn Taymiyya was a salafi. He was a hanbali sufi Who followed the qadiri tariqa. And you are the ones Who Bark against the ten thousands of scholars Who were asharis and sufis.
Talking too much is not good. Let the scholars share their studies. It does not fit us to talk about matters we don't know about. Even scholars don't want to talk. The most what they say is Allahu 'Alam, because they fear Allah and don't want to make errors. That's the light they shine.
May Allah bless our scholars and grant them success in spreading the truth!
Baraka Allah fik. Allahumma Salli ala Muhammad. th-cam.com/video/cfscYp7DJAI/w-d-xo.html
When a great scholar "Mohaddith ul asr" as stated by the scholars of Islam give his advise and some fools still dare to open their big mouths even thou they don't even know how to do wodo properly,then every logical person understand why the Muslim Ummah has gone down like this.
Assalamo aleykom. It is seems you don't know the reality about about this "great scholar"......
Albani spreading jahiliyya practice : he said that a woman can breastfeed a stranger man directly from her body..... astaghfiro Allah ! in Arabic, his fatwa :
th-cam.com/video/V_-smHaohFI/w-d-xo.html
@Eraf Mohammodiy Assalamo aleykom, mu dear brother. I love you in God. Would you accept that a Muslim lady gives her breast to a stranger, as recommanded by this "great scholar" ? Are you really interested by the teachig of our noble religion ?
@Eraf Mohammodiy "And whatever the Messenger has given you - take; and what he has forbidden you - refrain from. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is severe in penalty." (Surat Al-Hashr : 7)
In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims.
It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state.in Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206:
Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman:
The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
So it is very clear that we must not stray with deviant groups like Neo-Salafis and Ahbash.
@Eraf Mohammodiy حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ يَزِيدَ بْنِ، جَابِرٍ حَدَّثَنِي بُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ الْحَضْرَمِيُّ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَبَا إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيَّ، يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ حُذَيْفَةَ بْنَ الْيَمَانِ، يَقُولُ كَانَ النَّاسُ يَسْأَلُونَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَنِ الْخَيْرِ وَكُنْتُ أَسْأَلُهُ عَنِ الشَّرِّ مَخَافَةَ أَنْ يُدْرِكَنِي فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا فِي جَاهِلِيَّةٍ وَشَرٍّ فَجَاءَنَا اللَّهُ بِهَذَا الْخَيْرِ فَهَلْ بَعْدَ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ " نَعَمْ " فَقُلْتُ هَلْ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ مِنْ خَيْرٍ قَالَ " نَعَمْ وَفِيهِ دَخَنٌ " . قُلْتُ وَمَا دَخَنُهُ قَالَ " قَوْمٌ يَسْتَنُّونَ بِغَيْرِ سُنَّتِي وَيَهْدُونَ بِغَيْرِ هَدْيِي تَعْرِفُ مِنْهُمْ وَتُنْكِرُ " . فَقُلْتُ هَلْ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ مِنْ شَرٍّ قَالَ " نَعَمْ دُعَاةٌ عَلَى أَبْوَابِ جَهَنَّمَ مَنْ أَجَابَهُمْ إِلَيْهَا قَذَفُوهُ فِيهَا " . فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صِفْهُمْ لَنَا . قَالَ " نَعَمْ قَوْمٌ مِنْ جِلْدَتِنَا وَيَتَكَلَّمُونَ بِأَلْسِنَتِنَا " . قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ فَمَا تَرَى إِنْ أَدْرَكَنِي ذَلِكَ قَالَ " تَلْزَمُ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِمَامَهُمْ " . فَقُلْتُ فَإِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ لَهُمْ جَمَاعَةٌ وَلاَ إِمَامٌ قَالَ " فَاعْتَزِلْ تِلْكَ الْفِرَقَ كُلَّهَا وَلَوْ أَنْ تَعَضَّ عَلَى أَصْلِ شَجَرَةٍ حَتَّى يُدْرِكَكَ الْمَوْتُ وَأَنْتَ عَلَى ذَلِكَ " . (صحيح مسلم 1847 / باب الأَمْرِ بِلُزُومِ الْجَمَاعَةِ عِنْدَ ظُهُورِ الْفِتَنِ وَتَحْذِيرِ الدُّعَاةِ إِلَى الْكُفْرِ)
@@boras3547 you're must've been followers muhammad needs hijab, watch throne in the throat youtube channel, they expose hijab lies againts Albani Rahimahullah
Ibn Taymiyyah states [Majmū ‘l-Fatāwā 3/227-229]:
“People know there was alienation and animosity between the Hanbalīs and the Asharīs. I was of those who strived to reconcile the Muslims’ hearts and unify them, in emulation of the command to hold fast to Allāh’s Rope. I removed most of the alienation that existed in the hearts. I clarified that al-Asharī was one of the most noble of the speculative theologians (Mutakallimūn) [...]
And when I publicised the words of al-Asharī and the Hanbalīs saw it, they said, “This is better than the words of Shaykh al-Muwaffaq [Ibn Qudāmah]!” The Muslims rejoiced at the unification of the ranks.
I publicized what Ibn Asākir stated in his virtues (Manāqib) [of al-Ash’arī] that “the Hanbalīs and the Asharīs were united until the time of al-Qushayrī”, for when the [well-known] controversy (Fitnah) took place in Baghdad, it caused disunity, and it is known that every group has followers who are [both] upright and astray.”
How far away these "Salafis" are from Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya! The scholars of Ahl al-Hadith/Atharis always united with Asharis when it was necessary to defend muslim countries and community. Like Ibn Qudamah who entered Saladin Ayyubis army to fight the crusaders.
sheykh al yaqoubi is from ahle al bayte and is ashari in aqeedah and sufi master...
@@tazboy1934 yaqoubi has made up shirk bida like saying Creation is All Seeing like Allah, stop the gufi sufi lies!
@@tazboy1934 your sufism is like how christians sainthood works shame on you!
Assalamao aleykom. Sufis like Salahuddin were great people. They fighted to give freedom to the people. Ans we can compare with how salafo-wahabis are complices of colonialism. th-cam.com/video/h7fF0y4lCqI/w-d-xo.html
@@boras3547 Salahudin executed sufis.
you psudeo Sunni sufi s who follwo shi'as with bida like mawlid teach shirk while Tawhid is linked to security in Quran 24 :55!, it is you who help colonies
A big issue is the lack of a Khalifa. The abolishment of the khalifa in a sense could be classified as bidah as it is something that existed since the Prophet PBUH. It was possible to have unity under the Khalifa as it represented the Muslims and would be responsible to ensure that the truth was enforced and Muslims didn't deviate and separate. Unfortunately the creation of sects is inevitable
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers.
- funny you call Madkhalis ahl bida when Quran 49 :11 says don't give nicknames & you can't show their errors, & you accuse of taghoot loving but you support late secular Uthmanis.
Allah has tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55...
We have to implement Tawhid and Quran 13 :11 says Allah doesn't change our condition until we change ourselves, so we have to return to our din Islam and unite on it and teach it.
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers.
No I was asking for verifiable proof, just remember you get sins when you lie, and you lied on tafsir, defender secular Uthmanis so who really likes taughut, and acted ignorant of the Istiwa of Allah which is basic Islam, you have alot to learn before speaking on it, go learn sunna over jahmi psuedo Ashari bida and dont waste time like you done before.
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers.
Where did you provide evidence?
So you lie again?
The more you sin the more you show only you really follow taughut.
A mujaddid of the 20th century.
Self-made "mijaddid" - a joke.
He himself never made extravagant claims about his self or his abilities like many others, he (may Allah SWT reward him) never gave himself grand titles like sooo many people do today, he was humble and excellent in character, if you observed him you saw the sunnah manifesting itself from his actions words and deeds. He was a scholar who contributed a great deal of Khair but he was not free from errors. Was he a mujaddid? Only Allah SWT knows this. May Allah reward our dear sheikh.
@@eesaabuusaamah7756 correct 👍
I dont think so. A mujaddid would unite the ummah, not divide it.
Assalamo aleykom. In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims.
It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state.in Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206:
Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman:
The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
The Sheikh's reply does not answer the question IMO. Was Salhudin not Ashari & the Muslims (so called Sunnis at least) United behind him & were not the Afghan Mujahideen who defeated the Russians not Deobandi. Sometimes you have to unite with others whom call themselves Sunni, to protect your existence.🤷🏾♂️🤔
says john smith..sorry..but those khawaarij have existed long before even your jahmiyyah kind...there are THOUSANDS of soofi taariqat worldwide and the most IRONIC part of it all is each soofi "master" of each taariqa claims his taariqa is the way to Allaah azza wa jal and all others are no good..
repent and stick to the authentic sunnah
You are a Jahil and talk nonsense. Show me one Qadiri shaykh, who says that other Tariqas are astray. Show me one Shadili shaykh who says this! Show me one Naqshibandi Shaykh saying this!
Btw your Scholars like Ibn Qudamah, Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Qayyim, Dhahabi etc. were all in favor of sufism and practiced it themself.
lalala lölölö
*Hanfi and Shafi fought, they killed each other.. Now days Deobandi Sufi Naqshabandi Hanfi and Barelwi Hanfi are fighting, they are not ready to pray behind Deobandi Naqshabandi Hanfi... LOL*
M K
The najdi movement is to blame for much of the disunity in the ummah, if you don't comprehend this, you're lost!
@@MK-ml1qd Are salafis united? Why do IS and Al Nusra fight each other? Why do some salafis call Albani Murji'i?
Nonsense. Most Naqshbandi, Shadili, Qadiri shaykhs recognize each other as right guided.
Allah preserved fiqh through the fuqaha, and Ihsan through the sufies, Hadith through Muhaditheen, Tafsir through mufassarin and Aqida through sunni mutakilmeen (schlolars of aqida) the Asharis and Maturidis. The Asharis confronted the heretics and smashed their arguments, upheld and defended the Aqida of Rasul Allah (PBUH) and Sahabas. Ibn Hajar Haytami Al Makki says, "know that Ahusunnah wal Jama'ah are Ash'aris and Maturidis"
All major scholars were either ash'ari or Maturidi in Aqida.
You both are stray and leading astray. All scholars (including Hanbalis) agree that Sufism is from the Sunnah.
Imam Dhahabi says about his teacher Al-Musali: "He was devout, good, a Sufi (mutasawwif) and someone who abstained from what is unlawful."
Ibn Taymiyya writes: "some people criticised Sufiyya and Tasawwuf and they said they were innovators, out of the Sunnah, but the truth is they are striving in Allah's obedience" (Majmu Fatawa)
Ibn Qayyim: "We can witness the greatness of the People of Sufism, in the eyes of the earliest generations of Muslims" (Manazil as-Sa'ireen)
Imam Shafi'i says: "Be both) a faqih and a sufi: do not be only one of them" (Diwan al-Shafi'I)
Which scholars agree sufism is from the sunnah? Are grave worshippers from the Sunnah?
And AlBani was " fuqah", "Muhadith", "mufassir'', "mutakil" - 4-in-1 , what a joke for this "Teach Yourself" "Scholar".
@@@jagenaught - a brainwashed salafi
Very common mistake. Just because you practice Tasawwuf doesn't mean you are a Sufi. Perhaps linguistically, but it does not put you in a sect. Without Tasawwuf, there is no Islam, and this is a fact. There has to be some level of spirituality.
However, to place of the Sufiyyah in one group...Laa! How is this so? Just because one wishes to practice Tasawwuf to a greater extent does not mean he wishes to do it in a manner that puts him out from the folds of Islam. Yes, there is going to be a Mubtadi', or many of them, but not all Sufiyyah are so. It is wrong to class all of them as one, as you cannot class all blacks as criminals because a large percentage of them have committed crime, hypothetically speaking.
As to how one should practice Tasawwuf, Allah has given us that in Qur'an and Sunnah, no doubt, and to follow other than that and to make up things, to innovate for the sake of 'spirituality' is but a load of garbage, and there our entire 'Aqeedah would differ.
In Muhammad (SAW) Sunnah, and in the Qur'an, there are more than enough Du'aa and Dhikr to make, so many ways to be closer to Allah, just as how he has given us five Salawaat, each with their specific ways to pray it, not left us to worship him as we will.
Let's be content with the Qur'an and Sunnah, for no doubt in it is the best of guidance, and to deny that is nothing but blasphemous actions, may Allah guide us all.
Who can say that asharis and sufis are not beleivers ? If they are, than the one who says it is not.
Al Albani and psudo salafi are misguided.
Sayyidina Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (68 AH)
Ibn Abbas and the Companions of the Prophet, sallahu alayhi wa salam:
Concerning the verse, “The day that a Shin will be laid bare,” (Quran 68:42)
Ibn Abbas interpreted the “shin” to mean “severity.” Commenting on this verse, Imam al Tabari said, “A group of the Prophet’s companions and their disciples, and the people of figurative interpretation have said, ‘He will uncover a severe matter.’ And among those who interpreted the shin to mean ‘severity’ from the Imams of Quranic exegesis are Mujahid, Said Bin Jubayr, Qataba and others. Allah be He exalted said, ‘And the sky we built with hands. And it is We who give expanse.’ (Quran 51:47).
Ibn Abbas said concerning it: “With strength.” (Tafsir al Tabari) That is, “We built it with strength.”
--
{ يَوْمَ يُكْشَفُ عَن سَاقٍ وَيُدْعَوْنَ إِلَى ٱلسُّجُودِ فَلاَ يَسْتَطِيعُونَ }
“On a day when shin shall be exposed, they shall be ordered to prostrate, but be unable” (Qur’an 68:42)
It shows that the great Sahabi, Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas actually made ta’wil (figurative interpretation) of this word. It is also a rebuttal to those who disputed its authenticity.
Ta’wil of ‘Saaq’ from Ibn Abbas: Read Here
--
"...The Holy Prophet(s) said: May Allah grant him (Ibn Abbas) deep understanding of religion."
[Sahih Muslim Book :031, Hadith No.6055]
Sa`ad ibn Abi Waqqas said, Ibn Abbas would speak and Umar would not disregard what he had to say.”
--
Ibn Abbas said, “I am of those well grounded in knowledge, who know the meaning (of the allegorical verses).” [Imam Suyuti, Itqan, Vol: 2, page, 4]
To the fake hanbalis-
Ibn al-Jawzi: “You have made this madhhab such a shameful disgrace that when it is said, “Humbali,” it is understood that he is someone who likens GOD to His creation.
You have then made your way to be that of bigotry and intolerance, showing fanatical support for Yazid ibn Muawiyyah, when you well know that the founder of the madhab permitted cursing him”.
(Ibn al Jawzi rejected and repudiated Yazid for his behavior)
And, Abu Muhammed Tamimi used to say about one of your imams that:
“[he] has disgraced the madhhab in a terrible way and it will not be cleansed until the day of resurrection.” [Daf` Shubah al-Tashbih bi Akuff al-Tanzih]
if there is evidence something should be interpreted then thats different but if none its taken at Face Value like seeing Allah's Face in Heaven or Seeing Allah in judgement day! Surah Qiyama says we wll see Allah! also
“When the people of Paradise enter Paradise, Allah - may He be blessed and exalted - will say: ‘Do you want anything more?’ They will say: Have You not made our faces bright? Have You not admitted us to Paradise and saved us from Hell?’ Then the veil will be removed and they will not be given anything more beloved to them than looking at their Lord, may He be glorified and exalted.” Narrated by Muslim.
The Salaf took thing on their Thahir meaning unless their is proof from Quran and Sunnah!
***read this Abdur Rahman dot org , Foundations of the Sunnah (Usool-us-Sunnah) - Imam Ahmad - English Text
**CHAPTER THREE
SOME SAYINGS FROM THE SALAF CONCERNING
ALLAAH’S ATTRIBUTES AND THEIR IJMAA’ (CONSENSUS)
CONCERNING THE FALSEHOOD OF TA’WEEL - A
REFUTATION OF THE ASH’ARIYYAH 133**
Al-Awzaa’ee (d.157H) said, “I asked az-Zuhree and Makhool
about the aayaat pertaining to the Sifaat (Attributes of Allaah),
so they said, ‘Leave them as they are.” 134
lmaam Ahmad (d. 2.41] said, “These ahaadeeth should he
left as they are ... ‘We affirm them and we do not make any
similitude for them. This is what has been agreed upon by the
scholars.” 136
Nu’aym ibn Hammaad (d. 228H) said, “Whoever makes
tashbeeh (resemblance) of Allaah to his creation has committed
kufr (disbelief). And whoever denies what Allaah has described
Himself with has also committed kufr. Indeed, all that Allaah
has described Himself with, or what His Messenger has
described Him with - then there is no tashbeeh in it at all.” 137
**CHAPTER FOUR
AFFIRMING THE SIFAAT WITH THEIR DHAAHIR
(APPARENT) AND HAQEEQI (REAL) MEANING AND A
REFUTATION THAT THE WAY OF THE SALAF WAS
ALLEGEDLY TAFWEEDH 157 - A REFUTATION OF THE
MUFAWWIDAH***
The Most Merciful has ascended over the Throne
Soorah Taa-Haa (20):5
Muhammad ibn Yoosuf (one of the teachers of Imaam Bukhaaree) said,
“The one who says that Allah is not over (‘aLa) His Throne is a kaafir.
And the one who thinks that Allaah did not speak to Moses is a kaafir.”
Khalq Af’aalul-’lbaad of Imaam al-Bukhaaree, no. 66.
Imaam al-Bukhaaree (d. 256H) said, “Mujaahid (d. 104H) said
about Istiwaa: ‘Rising over the Throne.” 161
Ibn Jareer at-Tabaree (d. 310H) said concerning the saying of
Allaah, the Most High:
“The Most Merciful made Istiwaa over the Throne.” 162
meaning: ‘Rising above and Ascending. 163
Al-Khattaabee (d. 388H) said, “The madhhab of the Salaf (the
Pious Predecessors) with regard to the Sifaat (Attributes of
Allah) is to affirm them as they are ‘alaa dhaahir (with their
apparent meaning), negating any tashbeeh (resemblance) to
them, not takyeef (asking how they are).” 169
Allah says - translation of the meaning- :
{The Most Gracious Rose (Istawa) above the Throne} [20:5]
Ibn Jarir At-Tabari (d. 310 H.) said: “and His saying {Adh-Dhahir}, He is saying: And He is dhahir over everything below Him, and He is High above everything, nothing is higher than Him. {Al-Batin} He is saying: and He is the batin of everything, nothing is nearer to anything than Him, as He said: {And We are nearer to him than his jugular vein} [50:16].” (2)
- Hadith of the slave girl:
Mu’awiyah as-Sahmi reported: «I had some sheep which I kept between Uhud and Juwaniyyah with a slave girl... I said, "Messenger of Allah! Shall I free her (as an expiation of my sin.) He said ”Call her over.“
When I did, he asked her: **”Where is Allah? She said: "fi as-sama (above the Heavens)"
**
Then he asked her, ”Who am I ?“ She said: "The Messenger of Allah -Sallallahu alahi wa Sallam-".
Thereupon, the **Messenger of Allah - Sallallahu alahi wa Sallam- ordered me, ”Free her for she is a believer.“** [Saheeh Muslim]
1. Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq (radhi allahu anhu):
Abdullah Ibn Umar -May Allah be pleased with him- reported: “When the Messenger of Allah - Sallallahu Alaihi wa-Sallam- passed away, Abu Bakr - May Allah be pleased with him- ascended the minbar, praised Allah and said: «O people ! if Muhammad was your god whom you worship then your god has died, and if your God is the one above the heaven (fis-sama') then your God did not die. Then he recited: {Muhammad is not but a messenger. (Other) messengers have passed on before him. So if he was to die or be killed, would you turn back on your heels (to unbelief)?…} [3:144]’ until he completed the ayah.» (1) Its isnad (chain) is hasan.
2. Abdullah Ibn Masud -May Allah be pleased with him- said: «Between the lowest heaven and the one after it is the distance of five hundred years, and between every two heavens is the distance of five hundred years, and between the seventh heaven and the Kursi is the distance of five hundred years, and between the Kursi and the water is the distance of five hundred years, and the Throne (Arsh) is above the water, Allah the Almighty is above the Throne (fawqa Al-Arsh). And nothing is hidden from Allah of your deeds.» And in another narration «He knows what you are upon». Its grading is: hasan. (2)
3. Abu Hanifah An-Nu`man (d. 150 H.) :
At-Tahawi said in “Al-Aqeedah At-Tahawiyah”, in which he wrote the beliefs of Imam Abu Hanifah and his two companions: Abu Yusuf and Muhammad bin Al-Hasan :
“And the Throne and Kursi.are true, and He is independent from the Throne and what is beneath it, He encompasses everything (? Is above it.”
His saying: “And Is Above it” meaning: “He is above everything” is affirmation of the elevation of Allah Azza wa Jal above all of creation, including the Throne.
And his saying in another section of the book: “Nor is He contained by the six directions as all created things are.” Is a negation of the creations’ encompassing of Allah -Azza wa Jal- , for the “He is not contained by the six directions” that is creation, He is above the six directions and all creation. This is a reply to the Hulooliyah and Jahmiyyah who said that Allah is in His creation, and that He is everywhere - Exalted is Allah above that-.
It was also narrated in al Fiqh Al-Akbar that Imam Abu Hanifah said: “Whoever says: ‘I do not know if Allah is above the heaven or on earth’, then he has disbelieved, Allah Ta`ala said: {The Most Gracious over the Throne Istawa (Rose)}; If he then says: ‘I do say this ayah but I don’t know if the Throne is above the heaven or on earth’ then he has disbelieved too.” (3)
And that is because in both statements he is doubting Allah’s elevation, him not knowing if Allah is above His creation or not. And in it is also the belief in the possibility of Allah being inside His creation -Exalted is Allah above that- . So by that he is denying the Islamic texts, and believing in the permissibility of Allah residing in His creation, and both (4) are kufr (disbelief).
Assalamo aleykom. I love all of you in God. In Sahih Muslim [1847, chapter of obligation to stay with the majority (Jamaa) in period of fitna], the Prophet warns us about the predicators that invite people to hell and that we must stick to the majority of the Muslims.
It has been narrated on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: People used to ask the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said: Messenger of Allah, we were in the midst of ignorance and evil, and then God brought us this good (time through Islam). Is there any bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. I asked: Will there be a good time again after that bad time? He said: Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil. I asked: What will be the evil hidden therein? He said: (That time will witness the rise of) the people who will adopt ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know good points as well as bad points. I asked: Will there be a bad time after this good one? He said: Yes. (A time will come) when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whoso responds to their call they will throw them into the fire. I said: Messenger of Allah, describe them for us. He said: All right. They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language. I said: Messenger of Allah, what do you suggest if I happen to live in that time? He said: You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader. I said: If they have no (such thing as the) main body and have no leader? He said: Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees until death comes to you and you are in this state.in Bukhari : Volume 9, Book 88, Number 206:
Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman:
The people used to ask Allah's Apostle about the good but I used to ask him about the evil lest I should be overtaken by them. So I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (i.e., Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted (not pure.)'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "(There will be) some people who will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of some others." I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, (there will be) some people calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
So, we have to stay with the Jamaa and not stray away with marginal groups, like neo-salafis and Ahbach. Allahumma Salli ala Muhammad.
@@boras3547 neo salafis? Salafi dawah is the dawah based on Quran and Sunnah and linked to Hanbalis and Imam Ahmad was upon the truth when he was in the minority and he was called the jammat and compared to abu Bakr.
@@boras3547 jamma doesn't mean majority, jamma means groups. you either don't know Arabic or lost.
Uthmani/Ottomons were Ashari at 1st & due to bida of Tawil left door open for cult batiniya sufiya shia & even infiltrations by masonry young turks who are said to be crypto judeos, fit in due to all bida & lying on Islam. they even allowed being a h()m(). Which is why teaching all 4 mathabs are salafi as Sheikh Albani Rahimahullah compiled their sayings in his book Prophets's Prayer is important - it creates what Islam being a preserved religion is meant to do unite on clear transparent proof as the Prophet peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you. they Young T pushed oppression on Hashemites modern Jordan who were tricked by the judeo masons outside of Turk, the ones in uk with promise of Palestine. Rothschild banking family owns the israeli occupation and they had a banking synasty in uk and in else where. both the rothschild and the young t have a common father in crypto judeo dajjal , an actual dajjal who said he was a messiah in sabatei zevi!
So the civil war with Uthmani Ottomons took place in ww1, uk backed Jordan hashemites of west Arabia were tricked out of the Palestine Land and Saudis of East Arabia protected Mecca and Medina from Hashemites of Jordan betrayed by uk.
Nonetheless I pray turks and indian sufis return to the Tawhid and Sunnah!
@@boras3547 Also watch this : Refuting the "Hadith of Najd" argument against Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab
Najd during Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum's time lke with Salim bin Abdullah bin Umar was iraq. theres a place in USa named mecca, do we do hajj there no! Also Ibn Abdul Wahab is from tamimi tribe which is said to be hardest on dajjal, lastly his books are available teaching basic Tawhid and the proofs of him reviving the sunnah like Sheikh Albani is right there!
Tawhid is linked to safety - Quran 24,55. sufi & shia went way of Quran 9,31 rabbis & priests grave worship & mawlid bida like christmas. Shirk leads to colonies in hadiths like in sufi lands imitating shias. bida divides umma who reunited on secularism like christians. Islam is perfect, honor Islam, by not mixing in bida, Follow sunna ilm & you will get victory and unity! Start with Tawhid!
Also Prophet peace & blessings on him said my ummah will divide into 73 sects all in the hell fire except 1, those who are upon what me and my companions are upon! Also there will always be a group in my ummah open and victorious on the truth.
This is Manhaj Salafi, Ahlul Hadith same mathhab of the 4 imams who all said return to the Prophet peace and blessings on him and all imams should teach this.
guys watch this video by Sheikh Albani : The Term 'Wahhaabi' And The Reason For Its Propagation By The Ottoman Empire
-
british feared Salafi revival in india through Saudis so they pushed ottomons to fight them while funding sufi preistly division. clarify a few key points, call ppl to the scholars small simple books it makes all the difference. Make the dawa easy for you and others! why are ppl lying about Islam and the scholars including deviant Sufis Yasir ikwani Qadhi, clearing the name of scholars is among the greatest ways to clarifying Islam! Modern terrorism goes back to shia marxist sayyed qutub whose stamp is in Iran, and used for the 79 cia revolt where the original jet bombers who took in exiled al queda are. then shia agents like chalabi lied on iraq wmds with israelis, shiasm returning to their judeo roots. kawarij are not Sunnis but linked to shias and sufis and others!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 In the famous book "Al Aqeeda Attahawya", Imam Tahway exposed the Aqeed of the Salaf Salih : Allah without limits, nor corners, nor body and not concerned by the six directions «تـعـالى - أي الله - عن الحدود والغــــــــايـــــــات والأركان والأعضـاء والأدوات لا تحـويــــــه الجهــــــاتُ السـِتُّ كسائر المبتَدَعات »
If you look at the history of Islam, victories were given to Muslims who were either Ashari or Maturidi ( to give an example Mehmet of the Ottoman empire who was a maturidi and a Sufi who conquered Constantinople and also Salahuddin (most likely Ashari since most of shafis are)...I think this modern salafi movement is the disease in the ummah since its arrival, Islam as a force has gone downhill. Please name me a Salafi Leader or army that has conquered anything??? I'll wait........
Ok...the salaf are the sahaba down to the umayyad to some of abbasid down to the latest one salafi saudis who driven the ahlus bid'a was shirk regime (soofi ashharee) who told you that salahuddin al ayyobi is soofi or ashari?
@@yasserzain1521 this is absolute rubbish. Ashari and maturidi have always been the majority amongst the Muslims. Salafis/wahabis are about 2 hundred years old and are still the minority.
Saudis drove out the ahlul bidah? Do you mean they revolted against the Ottomans who conquered so much land for Islam. What happened after they 'drove out the ahlul bidah'? Oh yeah, the Muslims lands had lines drew through it.. Like I said pseudo salafis are a fitna to this ummah.
@@SajidAli-ip7ov the most followed and influential Muslim country is saudi..yeah you belong to the majority of 72 sects where to be thrown in jahannam as prophet SAW said.
@@yasserzain1521 how is Saudi the most followed and influencial? It's only influencial because of petrol dollars, by which they can print copies of literature and send it out to the Muslim world. How do you know I'm going to jahannam? Are you judging in matters only Allah judges in? That's the problem with you salafis, you have no mercy in your hearts and are quick to throw people in jahannam and place yourselves in Jannah. How deluded.
Saying Ashari and Maturidi is misguided is saying 95% of Sunni Muslims are misguided. I agree with many of the Wahhabi teachings such as their opposition to seeking mediators to Allah, but saying Ashari or Maturidi creed is misguided and going to hell itself is misguided. I think Salafi creed is excess in anthropomorphism. Remember both Ibn Taimiyyah (Salafi founder) and Ibn Hajar al Asqalani (an Ash'ari) had great respect for each other even though they differed in many of their opinions. Then how can we call each other kafir?
The prophet said all groups are going to hell except for ONE so that means very clearly that not all groups were muslims only the one that made it to jannah were Muslims....... The others called themselves muslims but had problems which lead them to jahannam..... So the sheikh here is not saying that we are all one(sufis and shias and maturidees) because we all know that sufis are veey different from sunnis and shias are very different from maturidees and so on.... Most groups that have come up have very major problems and are unexpectable
As for asharis... Imam nawawi was one and some other great scholars were..... We unite with the ones whose differences are not unexpectable according to the quran and sunnah
The Prophet (saw) did not say that the other 72 sect are in hell forever. He just said they are in hell. Some muslims will enter hell and then come back to jannah. So even shias etc can be muslims.
Many great scholars were ash'aris, maturidis or sufis. Ibn taymiyya and ibn qayyim were sufis. Muhammad al fatih Who conquered constantinople was a maturidi.
@@hsdjsdshdhsdnsmsd6247 there are 2 types of sufism, one that does zuhud in dunya and thats ok, but others did so much zuhud they didn't learn the din, and reunited on ignorance and imam extremism and even jinn usage. imam extremism likely led to their shirk as this was the foundation of shirk in Nuh the first MEssenger Alehas Salam's time. and sufis also imitated many shia bidas like mawlid and grave worship, and holy spirit type inspiration and bidas. sufis and shias are the preists and rabbis of the ummah with theri bida and their christmas style mawlid taking centuries to form like christmas shirk is very clear indication of that and betrayal of the sunnah of the Prophet peace and blessings on him's comman on his death bed don't go to extreme with me and mix masjids with graves like the ahlul kitab did.
@@hsdjsdshdhsdnsmsd6247 Ibn Taymiyyah & Ibn Qayyum were Hanbalis though and salafi, not modern sufis who use ABu Hanifah for fiqh and reject Imam Ashari who became an Ashari at the end of his life and wrote al ibanah!
Wallahi! saying that Ibn Hajar and An-Nawawi are Ashariah is baseless thing
@@Abu__Maryam yes there was a small things that they agree with a sharia like the attributes of allah the aqiidah
Example imaamu Nawawi he made a (Ta’wil) in attributes of allah
But before he death he repented and said I was I wrong
He was a salafi رحمه الله He just made a ijtihad
And a prophet scw said in a saheeh hadeeth
On the authority of Amr ibn al-Aas - may God be pleased with him - that he heard the Messenger of God - may God’s prayers and peace be upon him - say: “If the ruler makes a judgment, then he strives hard and then becomes correct, then he is rewarded two reward and if he rules, then he strives hard, and then makes a mistake, he also will rewarded but one reward
A self-made "muhaddith". A Teach-Yourself "scholar". A "no-teacher" muhaddith. In spite of the consensus of Hadith Scholars, he has the gut to categorized the Hadiths of Imam Bukhari as "sahih" and "weak" - better than authentic scholars of Islam. When in fact he himself is a "fabricated" muhaddith. He is one of the creators of the "salafi" sect, the greatest fitna in modern history of Islam. Is he a Sheik-ul Hadith? A hafiz? God knows really how many hadith he knows by heart.
So you say he is self taught? Laa Ba's. Most would agree that the *general* case is one should study formally. And then there are exceptions.
But the problem is when people neglect his qualifications. When it comes to his Qur'an recitation, anyone who knows Tajweed could see he has a good foundation. Memorywise, from his lectures alone.
As for aHadith, his qualifications so as to where he studied and how he studied does not matter. Not that you or I, or any other layman could dream of achieving what he did in his 30+ years of serious studies throughout the Middle East. But the fact of the matter is, yes, he was kicked from Madinah University(political matters), but years later, they acknowledged him, awarded him, and offered to hire him as the *Professor of Higher Education* in the University. Technically speaking, Madinah University acknowledged him to be qualified on that level, so to say he has no qualifications is nothing more than the words of either a fool, and arrogant hater, or an ignoramus.
Speak only of that which will benefit you, and only that which you have knowledge of, Akhi.
On a side not, he didn't even differ in the grading of more than 10 aHadith from Saheeh al Bukhari, and if I'm correct pertaining to the exact number, 6 aHadith.
For starters, many other scholars before him did the same thing, so to say he is unprecedented in that matter would be a lie. From among them are the names of Daruqutni, Hafidh ibn Hajar, and many others.
Imaam ash-Shaafi'i is quoted to have said, 'Allah has chosen to allow no book perfection other than the Qur'an'. So it is blasphemous to say that Saheeh al-Bukhari is perfect, and Imaam al Bukhari, as great and noble was he, was only a man, flawed and imperfect. It is for such reasons we take from Imaam Muslim, Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, Ahmad, Shaafi'i, and a great deal of other Muhadditheen as well.
Shaykh al Albaani did it in a respectful manner, and as he said, was only to be a part of the process in the perfection of such a great work. He held no ill will to Bukhari in doing so; rather, the very opposite!
@@@mukhtarally9667 - As I said, the concensus among Islamic scholars (Muhaddiths and Others) is that all the hadiths in Sahih al Bukhari are "Sahih". This is a fact. Is Albani using his own self -made methodology or is it following a certain acknowledged methodology? God knows. He does not have any formal education. Most of his time has been spent in the Library in Damascus doing self "research". To acknowledge, say a Doctor, he has to produce his certificates/degrees. Will you go to such a doctor with no degree, with no recognition? Certainly not. Can Al-Bani produce his Sanad that goes up to the Prophet? No. Then on what basis we call his a Scholar of Hadith? An Authoritative Scholar? Just because he has written some books? Regarding his return to Saudi Arabia after his ban (not a political issue but due to his lack of respect for the Prophet (SAW)) you should know his relation with Baaz, another proponent of the Salafi Sect. Albani has misled the Ummah to such an extent that he has created one of the greatest fitnah - the Salafi Sect - in the muslim community. One of his greatest blunder in Islam is his -8-rakaats tarawih. - and we call his a "scholar" !!!
@@abdoolrasheed7842 The first statement you make you make is false, and you really should back up your claim with some proof. There is no consensus that *all* of the aHadith in Jaami' Saheeh Al-Bukhari are Saheeh, as it is a compilation book of Hadeeth put together by a man. If it were not for that, Haafidh ibn Hajar and others would not have criticized certain aHaadeeth in it. One can say that it is the *most* authentic book after the Quran, but not that it is *completely* authentic.
As to whether he followed a certain methodology, that he did, and many scholars of aHaadeeth used Hikmah and knowledge to determine the authenticity of a Hadeeth on their own. And thus, while Abu Dawood may grade a Hadeeth as Sahih or Hasan, Ibn Maajah may grade it as Da'if. Nevertheless, if you did not know his methodology, why speak of it, or even for that matter, bring it up unless you wish to learn of it?
To proceed. While the benefits of formal studies are many, they are not always necessary. It might depend on the time, place, environment, the individual, ect. If one holds the discipline and the resources at hand, then why not spread the knowledge you have? Yet, at the same time, where did you derive that he has *no* formal education? While it is true that I do not know of much of his formal studies, I do know that Ijaazaat fall under that category, and Ijaazaat he had. And the concept of being self-taught is actually not that foreign, considering that most of the work of a MA or PhD is like that. It is research, finding sources by yourself, doing the work by *yourself*.
If you look at the lives of our righteous predecessors, and the 'Ulamaa of the past, many of them did not study formally, especially pointing out that there were not many areas for so-called formal studying. They might read, do their research, learn from a teacher here, then from there, from one country to a next, from one region to another. And on the fact of him being a scholar, regardless of who calls him a scholar, he never did so himself, rather, a *student* of knowledge.
As you completely neglected my statement earlier, he *was* considered qualified, as the Islamic University of Madinah deemed him so, as well as others. If you would use that they kicked him out, then why not use the issue of them later on requesting him be the Professor of Higher Education? And on a side note, he *was* praised greatly by prominent Saudi scholars of Hadeeth such as Shaykh Al-Uthaymeen and others.
As to lack of respect 'respect' is a relative term, and you have ye to produce what you mean by that. Unfortunately, I do not know what affair you speak of between him an Shaykh Ibn Baaz - please do inform me.
Lastly, if you call the concept of Taraweeh being 8 raka'aat 'one of his greatest blunders in Islam', then I do not know what is minor and major anymore. It has been a controversial issue in Islam, so why use that of all things? Especially considering this Hadeeth...
Volume 2, Book 21, Number 248
Jzk.
@@Epic Brah - The infernal trio, the devilish trio of the salafi Sect : Albani-Baaz-Uthaymeen. Here is his relation with Baaz.. (i) One thing is sure: there is no consensus among the modern scholars that Albani is a recognised Muhaddith. That he holds any authority in Hadith except among the Salafi Sect/Ahle Hadith Sect. (2) All of the Ulama of the past have got knowledge through recognised Teachers, many of whom were the compagnions of Sahabas. eg. The Hanafi fiqh is basically the teachings of Ibn Masud (R.A) and Ali (R.A)since both were settled in Kufa. All the 4 Imams had extensive training under the hands of Companions of Sahabas and/or prominent teachers of their time (This formal education of their time) - The Scholars of Hadith (Imam Safei/Imam Hambal/Imam Bukhari etc ) had close relationship with prominent pupils of Imam Abu Hanifa - so to say that these Scholars did not follow the Teach-Yourself methodology like Albani. Imam Bukhari would discuss hadith with his contemporaries like Imam Hambal (RA) , Yahya ibn Ma'in etc ... before including in his collection. (3) In spite of whatever hadith you quote, the Ummah has performed 20 rakaats of Taraawih until the emergence of the Ahle Hadith/Salafi Sect and their like. You think that these hadiths did not arrive to these prominent Scholars - then you are misquided. Even , inspite of so many difference with the Wahabi, 20 rakaats Taraawih are performed in the Masjid-e-Haram/Masjid-e-Nabawi (SAW). Sincere wish- Do not be like the Blind men and the Elephant www.allaboutphilosophy.org/blind-men-and-the-elephant.htm
Allah has punished the salafies/wahabies for deviating from the jama'h, look how the salafies have divided into subgroups and are now doing takfir on each other. Repent and return to Ahlussunnah Wal Jaam'ah.
God knows best. Defend Never Saudi goverment, but defend Islam, Mecca and Medina. Now they (the Saudis) built tall buildings in front of Muharram Mecca and Medina. Signs of the Judgment Day as the truthful M,uhammed ibn Abdullah said. ANDERSSON
ahmet03
You should know what Salaf means before puting yourself into shame.
Salaf means "those before us". So it refers to the way of the sahaba of the messenger and the messenger Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam of Allah.
And if this means that salaf stands for the way of the Sunnah of the Messenger then I am a salaf and I am proud to be a salaf. Unlike what you think and the media that brainwashed you.
And remind yourself about the Hadith that the true Muslims. Those on the way of the Messenger of Allah will be very little in number. Maybe we are talking about just a thousand people or little bit more. And indeed, those who are not on the straight way, we have to warn about them and send them the message.
hbk711x Did you actually says that Saudis, who are the biggest puppets of Israel defend Al-Aqsa against zionists? Saudis unite with America, instead of uniting with palestine and other muslims!
Saudi government are the most evil people in the world. they destroy historical buildings of sahaba (ra) to make money, they throw Palestine and Syria under the bus to get America as their ally. saudi princes can murder, steal and do drugs but get no punishment because saudi arabia only practices shariah on poor people.
Mecca and Medina were thousand years under the control of Sunnis (Maturidis/Asharis) and the Ummah did much better than today.
Not salafis salafis are ahlul sunnah say sufis ,salafu salih is ahlul sunnah wal jamaa