THE DЕАDLIEST civil airship accident: Forgotten British Giant R.101

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ค. 2024
  • Watch my exclusive video about the Soviet "Ghost Plane" Incident: nebula.tv/videos/paperskies-w...
    Get Nebula using my link for 40% off an annual subscription : go.nebula.tv/paperskies
    Watch More Paper Skies Videos & Support The Channel: nebula.tv/paperskies
    Support NEW EPISODES on Patreon: / paperskies
    The crash of the British airship R101 is not as well known as the famous Zeppelin Hindenburg Disaster. Nonetheless, the R.101 disaster still remains the biggest tragedy in history among commercial airships.
    On October 4th, 1930, the giant airship R-101 set to fly from London to India. At that time, it was the largest and arguably most luxurious airship in the history of aviation. The R-101 was the first link in the British Empire's ambitious plan to create a worldwide network of air routes and build a fleet of giant airships. Just like British dreadnoughts ruled the seas, British airships were meant to rule the skies. But the crash of R-101 put an end to Britain's ambitious Imperial plans.
    Chapters:
    00:00 - R.101
    01:40 - Air Giants
    03:48 - Socialist vs Capitalist
    05:55 - Intestines
    08:33 - Hydrogen
    10:35 - Diesel
    12:24 - Luxury
    15:30 - 14 Meters
    18:55 - First and Last
    22:04 - Curse
    Audiobook - Fatal Flight: The True Story of Britain's Last Great Airship is written by Bill Hammack • Fatal Flight audiobook...
    (This is NOT an affiliate link. I am not getting paid or encouraged by the author by any means)
    Credits:
    Britain's Giant Airship: R.101 by engineerguy (Creative Commons CC) • Britain's Giant Airshi...
    Airship Heritage Trust - www.airshipsonline.com
    Paper Skies - amazing stories about famous airplanes, historical events, or exceptional people that have changed the world of aviation or turned out to be unfairly forgotten.
    Click to Subscribe: / @paperskiesaviation
    Select imagery/video supplied by:
    Getty Images: www.gettyimages.com/
    AP Archive: www.aparchive.com/
    Music: www.epidemicsound.com
    All content on Paper Skies is presented in historical context for educational purposes.
    #aviation #history #airship

ความคิดเห็น • 999

  • @bombtwenty3867
    @bombtwenty3867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1200

    It's strange that under friendly conditions, these ships had a habit of burning, but during WWI, the RAF had difficulty at first bringing raiding Zeppelins down

    • @stejer211
      @stejer211 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      It must be a conspiracy!

    • @randomuser2461
      @randomuser2461 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@stejer211 Probably was.

    • @MrChainsawAardvark
      @MrChainsawAardvark 2 ปีที่แล้ว +330

      Relative to the size of the thing, the machine-guns make very small holes, and the rate of gas escape is not particularly fast. Furthermore, inside the gasbag, there isn't enough oxygen to support combustion - and even with a leak, it takes a while to get a proper mix for a conflagration. Combined with some safety release valves - well flammability is not much more of a concern than a 747 with thousands of gallons of jet fuel. Everything else about the airship though - is a lot more fragile.

    • @mikekemp9877
      @mikekemp9877 2 ปีที่แล้ว +128

      the hidenburg according to a history show i watched was quite safe as regards the gas bags.its downfall was a new paint they used on the fuselage.one spark either at docking or lightning caused it to go up with the bags then exploding.they did a reenactment with a scale model and exact spec paint.it was frightening to see how fast it went up! and from a tiny spark! much like the cladding used on the grenfell tower in london recently that turned it into a death trap!

    • @_NguyenHoangLong-kg6ko
      @_NguyenHoangLong-kg6ko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      Bullets unlike ones in American Movie, dont ignite or create spark when come into contact with metal let alone gasbag made of intestine, the size of the bullet is also small so holes on the gasbag probably wasnt fatal.

  • @osirisandilio
    @osirisandilio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +909

    Smoking, Asbestos and Hydrogen, sounds like a dream flight

    • @testaccount4191
      @testaccount4191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      don't forget fine dining

    • @davidhollenshead4892
      @davidhollenshead4892 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      The type of lighters used in the German smoking rooms was similar to those on autos, so they couldn't ignite the tobacco but they could get it to smolder.
      So smoking wasn't the big fire danger, but lightning was...

    • @Tuberuser187
      @Tuberuser187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@davidhollenshead4892 You don't even need something smoldering to make Hydrogen ignite, just something hot or the tiniest, weakest static spark that would need very sensitive detectors to measure. It also always *will* absolutely leak, especially with the tech of the day because it will slip between the actual atoms of anything containing let alone the sealants and materials back then.
      There are reasons things like Hydrogen are not used much as fuels outside of things like fuel cells in space flight, its a nightmare fuel, literally.

    • @slome815
      @slome815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      ​@@Tuberuser187 Thats not exactly right, hydrogen in space flight is not rare at all. The centaur upper stage has been using it since the 50's, The saturn 5 used it for all it's stages except the first stage. The space shuttle used it for it's main engines, and SLS will use it.
      If you want to look at nightmare fuels, just look at all the hypergolic fuels used in space flight or the lovely toxic fuels like the hydrazine used for the EPU in F16's.
      It's also not as easily ignited as you say, while a air/hydrogen mixture does indeed ignite very easily, pure hydrogen (like in the gas bags) will not ignite, nor will low concentrations, (you need at least 20% hydrogen in air for it to ignite, compared to the 2% of propane or lpg for example). This is one of the reason why they were almost impossible to set on fire by fighter planes during WW1, at least until the invention of incendiary bullets. They would sometimes crash land because of the sheer amount of holes shot in them, but thats about it.
      It's also notable that there are way more airships that crashed because of wind or storm then there are that went up in flames. If you want to look at a succesfull airship you don't have to look further then the the Graf Zeppeling, it flew almost 2 million km and was in the air for 700 days. It was in service from 1928, and was only retired after the Hindenburg disaster. By that time air travel was also becoming a better option even for long distance flights.
      Hydrogen is also not nearly as likely to leak through materials as helium is, while hydrogen is a smaller atom then helium, hydrogen gas is a diatomic molecule (H2), while helium is just atomic (helium does not form He2, it's just He atoms moving about).
      Leakage was never a problem during normal operation on a airship, since it was acually necessary to vent hydrogen to compensate increased buoyancy from fuel consumption.

    • @Tuberuser187
      @Tuberuser187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@slome815 I said it was rare "outside spaceflight", not rare in space flight.

  • @smiffy1947
    @smiffy1947 3 ปีที่แล้ว +686

    This is family history for me - the Chief Coxswain George ‘Sky’ Hunt was my great uncle and he died when, having actually escaped from the wreck, he went back into the inferno to try to rescue his best friend. I represented the family at the 85th anniversary commemoration of the disaster at the mass grave and memorial to the victims in Cardington, Bedfordshire, not far from the huge sheds where R100 and R101 were built.

    • @mycroft1905
      @mycroft1905 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      R100 was constructed at Howden, the former RNAS airship station near York.

    • @smiffy1947
      @smiffy1947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@mycroft1905 Of course she was - I stand corrected.

    • @mboyer68
      @mboyer68 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      What an honor to represent your brave Great Uncle! Cheers from the US!

    • @voornaam3191
      @voornaam3191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That weird word Cockswain always makes me smile. You daring Brits, you have the guts to use these naughty words, for it is tradition.

    • @smiffy1947
      @smiffy1947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@voornaam3191 Except that the pronunciation of Coxswain is “Cox’n” in the same way that Boatswain is pronounced “Bosun” - two words of naval origin that have no other connotation, daring or otherwise!

  • @afterburner94
    @afterburner94 2 ปีที่แล้ว +509

    Just gonna throw this out there : the visuals in this video are absolutely mind blowing. Aside from archival footage, the whole blueprints and 3D models used are really serving the narrative of the documentary. Absolutely zero regrets to be a subscriber. Amazing story telling, voice over, use of visuals and editing skills. Hats-off sir.
    Cherry on top is the shout out to Bill Hammock, The Engineering Guy at the end.

    • @millomweb
      @millomweb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I will add my comment here. This is a great video but the images interfere with the smooth running of the audio - having to pause frequently to properly view images interrupts the audio.
      Possibly bizarrely, I have knowledge of Walney where the Mayfly 'didn't' - I believe a gust of wind blew the ship sideways as it was emerging from the building causing the collapsible side of the ship to fail on impact with the doorway of the building. As for Cardington - the 2 sheds are still there and have been sporadically maintained - with the framework cleaned off with angle grinders sending sparks fair distances into a nearby car park damaging car paint. The car park belongs to the DVSA and the buildings are where books and guides on driving are written - including The Highway Code !

    • @skysunknownheroes
      @skysunknownheroes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yup the quality of his videos are great!
      tho, a fair warning, enjoy it while it lasts, sooner or later this channel would probably bombard the viewers with Nebula subscriptions to everyone and their mom

    • @jimdavison4077
      @jimdavison4077 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, now that you mention it this channels videos use of archival footage and not CGI from video games and such makes it so much more enjoyable. Nothing more annoying in a history video that a bunch of artificial images showing the creator was to lazy to piece together the mountain of stock archive footage.

  • @joshuahedges8806
    @joshuahedges8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    The fact that the R. 101 and the Hindenburg had the same metal sure was a twist for me.

    • @stevemastnick5034
      @stevemastnick5034 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just learned that a few years ago. Both the R101 and the Hindenburg were magnificently beautiful ships.

    • @elroyscout
      @elroyscout 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      At that point, you conclude that the metal is clearly cursed and/or has angered Zeus in some way.

  • @jobbiejew
    @jobbiejew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    Your channel is one of TH-cam’s hidden gems. Very interesting content.

  • @panachevitz
    @panachevitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    Iron Maiden (Bruce Dickenson) wrote a 20 minute masterpiece about the R101's last day, called "Empire of the Clouds." It's an amazing song, and if Bruce's cancer treatment hadn't been as effective as it was, it might have been the last Iron Maiden song ever written.
    The Engineering Guy channel (professor of engineering) also wrote a book about the R101 and did several presentations on the airship as well.

    • @ackelcurns4814
      @ackelcurns4814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      i love that song! it does a great job of telling the life story of the R.101! it's such a great song to listento!

    • @Lehr-km5be
      @Lehr-km5be 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Amazing song, in my opinion the very best done by Iron Maiden ever. Simply love it!

    • @chatteyj
      @chatteyj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did Led Zepplin do a song about it?

    • @Nausica112
      @Nausica112 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      my favorite on that album!!!

    • @tomyrody4412
      @tomyrody4412 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The whole intro is beautiful, it reminds me of the title screen of many JRPGS

  • @umvhu
    @umvhu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    The R100 design team included Barnes Wallis, the R101 essentially used an enlarged R100 frame and Barnes Wallis had doubts about it's strength and when the 14 metres was added he again expressed his concerns.
    When R101 departed Cardington the altitude was about 25m ASL, just to the South East is Hammer Hill about 4km at about 80m ASL, R101's lift was so poor it failed to clear the hill. A gondola gouged the hill and the furrow was still visible in 1981 when I visited the site.

    • @brober
      @brober 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Wow. Truly a led zeppelin.

    • @eleventy-seven
      @eleventy-seven 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Also the R100 used Aluminum in it's frame and the R101 because of it's unusual design change used cheaper but heavier alloy with steel and aluminum compounding the weight problems. The maker of this video is being polite. Almost all of the problems were the same as all projects when politician's make unreasonable demands and override sound engineering practices with changes along the way. The 100 was a success but was hidden away to prevent the failed 101 from more embarrassment. At least those who were at fault paid the ultimate price by being aboard her. There are many sources of info regarding this debacle. It reminds me of the F-35 as far as political will overriding common sense.

    • @ZGryphon
      @ZGryphon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Nevil Norway, Wallis's deputy who took over as chief engineer of R100 when Wallis left the project--and who would go on to fame under a pen name as the novelist Nevil Shute--spends a fair number of column inches on the R100 project, and the political mess that was R101, in his memoir _Slide Rule._ He, too, had grave reservations about the corners being cut by the R101 team, but they were ignored when he tried to raise them to the Air Ministry, because he was, after all, working for the competition.

    • @johnwolf2829
      @johnwolf2829 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@ZGryphon Socialists never respond well to criticism.
      Not then, not now.
      Honestly, there are land mines can can handle more pressure, and do less damage than those people.

    • @hernanposnansky4830
      @hernanposnansky4830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes
      Nevil Shute Norway wrote an accurate account of the development of both Airships. Unfortunately his book Slide Rule as you said ,is hard to find.
      But very informative about the Industry at the time and technically correct, as he was himself involved with the stress analysis of the 100 which he describes in detail, A good book for engineers.

  • @davidmcintyre8145
    @davidmcintyre8145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +201

    The Iron Maiden song"Empire of the Clouds"is a moving and powerful telling of the story of this airship

    • @BrettonFerguson
      @BrettonFerguson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Let me guess: "Empire of the clooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuououououds!" (Repeat 12 minutes)

    • @hammondpickle
      @hammondpickle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@BrettonFerguson Oddly enough it's not. I'm not a fan of Maiden but my wife is and plays me the song quite often when she's drunk (she likes it). It's basically roughly five minutes of singing followed by about ten minutes of guitar solos, drum solos, and guitar solos. I've not stayed awake long enough to find out what happens after that.

    • @joro5748
      @joro5748 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Thank you for the hint! I just checked the lyrics. A great combination of facts and poetry. Next, I'll listen to the song.

    • @TheAllAroundMan
      @TheAllAroundMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@BrettonFerguson it's actually 18 minutes

    • @DagarCoH
      @DagarCoH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@BrettonFerguson Let me add that apparently, you have no idea who Iron Maiden are and what kind of songs they make. It's a good song, even for non metal fans.

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +255

    Although airships were inherently dangerous, (given the available technology of the era) I'd love to have had the opportunity to see one, even travelled on one - perhaps the R100 rather than the R101.
    RIP to everyone who died in all airship accidents - true pioneers.

    • @datadavis
      @datadavis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      What's not safe about flying on thousands of cattle intestines glued together holding hydrogen gas?

    • @georgethompson1460
      @georgethompson1460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@datadavis about as safe as relying on thin canvas sheets to keep you aloft.

    • @Lucius1958
      @Lucius1958 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My father was about 10 years old when he saw the R100 arrive in Montreal: we had some photos of it in a family album.
      As for myself, I saw one of the Goodyear blimps at Johnnycake Field in CT; that was impressive enough in itself.

    • @arnbo88
      @arnbo88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Try www.zeppelin.nt-de . This modern age short (75m) rigid airship uses a carbon fiber/ aluminium air frame along with helium filled gas bags. Short 45 minute flights over southern Germany are 380 Euros. Not quite the same design as 100 years ago but much safer. I doubt that we will ever see long range airships again but rather only joyrides in blimps and balloons. A modern aircraft can fly non-stop 14,500 km in 17.5 hours and cost $1000 USD return. Our ancestors could only dream of international travel like this.

    • @flybobbie1449
      @flybobbie1449 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Still not safe, we had Virgin airships for a few years at Halfpenny Green airfield. One day one tried to land, then a short storm dumped snow on it. They decided to fly on to next stop, but it crashed on Clent Hills.

  • @XPLAlN
    @XPLAlN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I gave up my job at the helium factory. I won't be talked to in that tone.

  • @peterbrazier7107
    @peterbrazier7107 2 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    The Tragedy is that R100 got scrapped and there was no problems with it.

    • @hurri7720
      @hurri7720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      There were problems and it didn't compete even with smaller German airships.

    • @hernanposnansky4830
      @hernanposnansky4830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Peter Brazier
      The R 100 completed a successful flight to Canada and back as described by Nevil S Norway

    • @hurri7720
      @hurri7720 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hernanposnansky4830 , True, and almost surprising, isn't it.
      But it was too litle and much too late. Nothing to weep about, the time of the airships was approaching it's end.
      No need to claim the British was any good at it either.

    • @hurri7720
      @hurri7720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hernanposnansky4830 , Nevil was too involved to be honest, try instead the Wikipedia.
      "The end of the British airships
      The tale of the design of R100 and its claimed superiority to R101 is told in Shute's Slide Rule: Autobiography of an Engineer, first published in 1954. Although flawed and not quite as overwhelmingly superior as Nevil Shute Norway implied, R100 represented the best that conventional airship technology in Britain had to offer at the time.[citation needed] R101 suffered in comparison partly because of its many groundbreaking but ultimately dubious innovations, and also because of the weight of its diesel engines. In lifting efficiency, both dirigibles were inferior to the smaller LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin.".

    • @spaceranger3728
      @spaceranger3728 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hurri7720
      I thought it was interesting how, in Slide Rule, the engineers seemed more concerned about fire hazard of the aviation gasoline that was needed to power the engines than they were of the hydrogen.

  • @stejer211
    @stejer211 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Incredible accurate and great footage as well!
    Please keep up this quality, even if it takes longer to produce.
    We don't need another 'Dark Skies' on TH-cam...

    • @TheCommissarIsDead
      @TheCommissarIsDead 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Question,what’s wrong with dark skies? I haven’t watched that group of channels in a while

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@TheCommissarIsDead They've made some errors in videos over the last few years, and one error on a niche subject is all it takes for people to turn on you. Plus, I've seen people complaining about 'errors' when a Dark channel simply failed to repeat a popular myth. Sadly, that's an all too common problem.
      There was also a spate of people complaining about the use of royalty free or cheap footage related to rare and old vehicles on the Dark channels. People tend to forget tht finding good footage can be hard and sometimes expensive. We're watching TH-camrs - not multi-million dollar productions... but some people seem to forget that.
      More recently, some script flourishes have also led to accusations of AI usage in script writing or translation, which is apparently, unacceptable for some people. To each, their own, I suppose.

    • @stejer211
      @stejer211 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aymonfoxc1442 Several factual errors per video, each video again, year after year. 'Dark' channels are worthless.

  • @Foxbat320
    @Foxbat320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Important to remember that R100 designed by Barns (bouncing bomb) Wallace never had an accident but was scraped due to the the R101 tragedy.

    • @legitbeans9078
      @legitbeans9078 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I hate when things get scarped

  • @helenprole2960
    @helenprole2960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Amazing video! A video on the harrier (callsign ZA176) that landed on a cargo ship (Alraigo incident) would make my dreams come true! And expect to see me here on every video! Keep up the outstanding work!

    • @PaperSkiesAviation
      @PaperSkiesAviation  3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Thank you, Helen! Glad you liked it!
      Alraigo incident is now in my list. And I wonder why it wasn't there yet. Great story! Thx for reminding.

    • @testaccount4191
      @testaccount4191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That poor pilot got screwed afterwords

  • @na3044
    @na3044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Thanks for the recognition of the magnificent L59 (LZ-104) and Captain Bockholt.
    Things like the rings without wires had been tried by Schütte-Lanz in Germany in 1916-1918, and while some things there innovated were quickly adapted by the builders others did not.

  • @futurepig
    @futurepig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    It takes a lot of guts to fly an airship...

    • @na3044
      @na3044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Enter the Imperial German Navy Airship Detachement: "I have an idea, let's leave the parachutes and the reserve fuel at home and go bomb London!"
      The DELAG operated civillian passenger-ships before ww1, and the germans frequently used them for recon and bombing missions. And that was 15 years before R-101. They housed the ships in gigantic halls, some of which were actually able to be rotated into the wind.

    • @futurepig
      @futurepig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@na3044 I suspect you missed my point

    • @na3044
      @na3044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@futurepig Well damn, I guess you're right. takes a lot of the other kind as well though

    • @futurepig
      @futurepig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@na3044 I was just being silly. Of course, it also takes courage. And cow intestines.

    • @na3044
      @na3044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@futurepig Sorry, english idioms are hard.

  • @Rick-ve5lx
    @Rick-ve5lx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    When my dad was a small boy he saw R101 at no great height on a test flight over Coventry. He remembered waving at the crew in the control car who saw him and they waved back. He was later taken to Cardington by his grandfather (by motorcycle) and saw R101 on the mooring mast. His lifelong interest in aviation began at this point and he subsequently flew fighter jets.

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's a nice anecdote.

  • @MrVorpalsword
    @MrVorpalsword 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    What a beautiful little film .... lovely historical clips and great new drawings ... VERY informative - well done, and thank you Paper Skies.

  • @david5uper529
    @david5uper529 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have watched literally hundreds of documentaries about the Hindenburg, not once was I ever told that it was made, at least in part, from a British crashed air ship. Amazing research. Sterling video. Thank you

  • @jonskowitz
    @jonskowitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Also: USS Akron and USS Macon were awesome! The loss of both ships had more to do with poor operational planning and Navy brass not fully grasping the limitations of airships than any design flaw (though I will concede that the tail framework of both airships was substandard).

  • @nor0845
    @nor0845 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Interesting vid thanks for posting.
    Another British Airship that deserves a mention is the R34 which made the first ever East-West transatlantic flight and also return flight.

    • @hurri7720
      @hurri7720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wonder what you mean with the "first ever". I believe what you want to say is that it was the first.
      Germany had a regular transatlantic passenger traffic for many years.
      "Hindenburg, which began passenger flights in 1936 and made 36 Atlantic crossings."
      "In the summer of 1931 a South Atlantic route was introduced, from Frankfurt and Friedrichshafen to Recife and Rio de Janeiro. Between 1931 and 1937 the Graf Zeppelin crossed the South Atlantic 136 times."

    • @sirjames26
      @sirjames26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You failed to mention that happened in 1919 just a few days after the first nonstop trans Atlantic flight from Newfoundland by Alcock and Brown. The 1919 R34 flight had 22 RN people on board. That flight started near Edinburgh and as you correctly said they flew back again a few days later.

    • @nor0845
      @nor0845 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sirjames26 I didn’t ‘fail’ to mention anything, the subject is airships. I only mentioned the R34 as I thought it may be of interest given the subject of the vid.

  • @brianjones2899
    @brianjones2899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The engineer guy audio book over 6 or so hours is absolutely brilliant on a human level and technical. It was free from his site when I listened to it 3 years ago.

  • @DividedByZeero
    @DividedByZeero 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Finally, some light on one of the most forgotten yet one of my favorite airships

  • @chloeforman
    @chloeforman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    R101 was part of a competition in Airship designed envisioned by Prime Minister Ramsey MacDonald. The other design, the R100, was build by Private Companies. Among those who helped build the R100 was a young Nevil Shute Norway, better known as Nevil Shute, author of the 1957 Nuclear War book On The Beach

  • @sixstringedthing
    @sixstringedthing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I watched a video the other day about tower crane operators. I'm trying to decide which would be a more intimidating way to start your workday; climbing 100 meters up a rickety ladder inside a swaying metal tower to get to the crane cab, or climbing 3 meters down a vibrating ladder 500M above the ground to get into the engine cab with the roaring diesel. I suppose it doesn't really matter... it's not the height of the fall that's the problem, it's the sudden stop at the end. As an electrician I'm not unfamiliar with working at heights, but yeah... no thanks!
    In terms of critique: well researched, wonderfully produced, and your accent is a pleasant change from the British/American voiceovers, very pleasing to hear. Thanks for the videos!
    Edit: And thank you for the audiobook link too! :D

    • @K.A.T.W.M
      @K.A.T.W.M 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m a tower crane operator and I’d never EVER climb down a three meter vibrating ladder into a cramped Diesel engine.

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is already an outstanding channel - you've really hit the ground running.
    I only discovered your channel a day or two ago and I've already been spreading the word.
    I look forward to seeing whatever you come up with next.

  • @ianababenkova2969
    @ianababenkova2969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Interesting would be to experience a flight on such giant. Successful flight :) thank you for your video. 👏👏👏

  • @krashd
    @krashd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    21:20 We do still build airships, we are one of the few nations that do. There was that arse-shaped airship we were building for the US Navy, the US have since pulled out of the program but the company building it are going ahead and you sometimes see it flying around when it's not slowly crashing into things.
    It's called the Hybrid Air Vehicles Airlander 10.

    • @datadavis
      @datadavis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good luck.

    • @naturewalks661
      @naturewalks661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not slowly crashing into things, fucking lmao.

    • @sixstringedthing
      @sixstringedthing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      "Despite the US Navy cancelling their contract, we are confident of commercial success for this design... as soon as we can get it to stop slowly crashing into things".
      The marketing department has their work cut out for them it seems.

  • @kitbag9033
    @kitbag9033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is the third film of yours I've seen. I have to say your delivery, illustrations and occasional flashes of humor/irony have made it a hugely enjoyable and satisfying experience. Subbed

  • @specificnormalperson1972
    @specificnormalperson1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    1930: what is airship look like in future?
    2021: where is future airship?

    • @davidhollenshead4892
      @davidhollenshead4892 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Airships are making a comeback, due to their ability to fly across the world and deliver heavy cargo, to remain in the sky for months for unmanned survalence, and for carrying heavy loads in & out of remote locations.
      Expect them to have:
      Diesel Electric Gensets powering multiple Propellers,
      Variable Buoyancy Systems that don't require venting Lifting Gas,
      Either lifting bags of Helium or lifting bags of Hydrogen inside Lifting Gas Bags of Helium,
      To produce some lift aerodynamically as a lifting body,
      and a fly-by-wire system that controls the multiple fans like electric thrusters on large ships...
      Given the costs of heavy Cargo Aircraft, and even greater costs of Sky Cranes modern airships will economical, once someone spends the funds needed to build & certify modern designs...

    • @chillinthefeelin943
      @chillinthefeelin943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@davidhollenshead4892 I sure hope so... I wish to see an airship during my lifetime, that similar to the Hindenburg's majesty.

    • @Lucius1958
      @Lucius1958 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidhollenshead4892 The combo hydrogen/helium gasbags sound interesting: what would be the minimum amount of helium required to insulate the hydrogen?

    • @cinegraphics
      @cinegraphics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      2021: Everyone hiding from a virus.

    • @chatteyj
      @chatteyj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Bill the Welding Sloth We need helium to make funny high pitch sounds at parties, theres no room to be wasting it on air travel.

  • @72tadrian65
    @72tadrian65 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your illustrations are beautiful and very well detailed! The way you explain how this tech worked is amazing.

  • @peterhowell7657
    @peterhowell7657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Nevil Shute's autobiography 'Slide Rule' has a lot about the design of R100, and the politics between the two. Well worth a read if interested in this story.

    • @TertiaryBrewing
      @TertiaryBrewing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Really good book that, definitely worth reading if you have any interest in inter-war aviation

    • @SuperHeatherMorris
      @SuperHeatherMorris 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Very much recommended.

    • @45641560456405640563
      @45641560456405640563 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Y
      The book came to mind as soon as I saw the video but the name of it - and the author- escaped me. Read it many years ago and it wasn't bad. 👍

    • @georgew2014
      @georgew2014 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The novel The Airshipmen, by David Dennington, is a fictionalized account of the R101. The focus is on the personalities involved, like Schute, Lord Thomson, and Major Scott. But the politics are just below the surface.

  • @AlanTheBeast100
    @AlanTheBeast100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    If you can find the Neville Shute book, "Slide Rule" it is very much a great read about the R.100/101project.

    • @nafs53
      @nafs53 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think Neville Shute actually worked at Cardington on the R101.

    • @AlanTheBeast100
      @AlanTheBeast100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nafs53 I believe so since the book is his personal life story (in parts) and the detail in there on the airship side could only come from an insider. I haven't found the book yet - buried in the downstairs guest room somewhere....

    • @firstlast4413
      @firstlast4413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nafs53 You have got it backwards; Nevil Shute Norway (his actual name, as an aeronautical engineer) helped design the R-100, not the R-101. 'Slide Rule' is a fabulous book, and pulls no punches about the incompetence and political BS in the the government airship program which were responsible for the disaster to the R-101.

    • @hernanposnansky4830
      @hernanposnansky4830 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nick Shaw
      No he did not .
      His work was building the R-100 as stress engineer and later as chief engineer

    • @georgew2014
      @georgew2014 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nafs53 Schute worked on the R100. The two teams received updates on each other's work, which is how Schute knew that the R101 had serious flaws.

  • @cr6925
    @cr6925 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Fantastic work. Lots of very interesting details I just hadn't known before. Excellently put together. Please make more. Your channel is an absolute hidden goldmine! 😊

  • @horusfalcon
    @horusfalcon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a well researched and well-composed presentation. Thank you for uploading this.

  • @alexwest2573
    @alexwest2573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Airships are so cool, I have a blow up model of the Goodyear blimp hanging in living room, had it for like 10 years

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Surely you've had the entire house for ten years and not just the living room?

    • @alexwest2573
      @alexwest2573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@krashd well I like to take my old living room with me when I move, makes decorating easier lmao

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alexwest2573 RC enthusiasts always have planes, some have helicopters, but I'd love an RC blimp. Considering you can buy a tank of helium for birthday balloons and even buy hydrogen in some places it would be a costly but fun hobby.

    • @alexwest2573
      @alexwest2573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@krashd a rc blimp does sound really cool, I could never get the hang of rc helicopters, I used to really like the big styrofoam gliders they use to sell, I had a blast with those and the rockets they sold at the hobby shops that had parachutes, I lost one on the top of a church one time because the wind grabbed it while floating down

    • @meetoo594
      @meetoo594 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@krashd You can buy RC blimps, they are actually really cool. A mate of mine used to have one that just floated around his living room and you could steer the thing around (very slowly) with a little infrared controller. It was great fun trying to land it on top of things or steer it between chairs etc because it was so unwieldy to accurately control. Very relaxing toy. It was about 3ft long and looked like a Zeppelin. Cost around £150 back in the 90`s.

  • @daweshorizon
    @daweshorizon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Incredibly, the huge hangars where these amazing airships were made are still in existence at Cardington, Bedfordshire. Take a look! Love and peace.

  • @SuprAtheAceofSpades
    @SuprAtheAceofSpades 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've watched all of your videos and I love the presentation, factual tid-bits and choice of music and footage. You put great passion into them and it shows. Subscribed, keep them coming.

  • @jimdaw65
    @jimdaw65 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your videos are better that the ones I see on my TV. You don't take all the science out (because it's "boring") and you don't replace research by actors, staring moodily through a rain-streaked window :-) You also have a wonderful narration-voice. Oh, and you don't pad them out to 60 minutes by telling us the life-story of every single passenger on board, so well done you.

  • @planescaped
    @planescaped 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    As a kid I used to always wonder why airships went extinct, as they were such neat technology.
    Then as I got older I learned that they were never safe... though that said, I'm sure that with modern tech they could be made significantly safer, there's just little incentive or reason to make one other than as a luxury transport.

    • @arahman56
      @arahman56 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Its the economics that stands in the way, can't really make an airship that's both safe and economical enough to hit a midpoint between cruise ships and airplanes.

    • @lemondeepfried
      @lemondeepfried 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Modern airships are extremely safe, and small ones are still built. They just aren't built on anything approaching the scale of these behemoths for economic reasons. No one wants the combination of both higher cost and slower cruising speeds for any sort of commercial application.

    • @pepebeezon772
      @pepebeezon772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even then it can't compete with helicopters

    • @badbeardbill9956
      @badbeardbill9956 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They’re plenty safe. Especially when well designed and operated. That was never the issue - even after the Hindenburg disaster a second Hindenburg-class airship was built and a third was under construction when WWII broke out. What actually killed airships, or more accurately accelerated their death, was WWII. During the war the Zeppelins were scrapped for material. Meanwhile, you had some countries building hundreds of thousands of aircraft during the war, and producing a similar number of pilots. In the immediate post war world, the sheer number of transport aircraft, airfields, and experienced pilots and ground crew globally made any alternative a non starter. Even the great ocean liners, which had experienced problems in the Depression, would begin to be drastically outcompeted by conventional airplanes. Airships could have potentially become a larger industry though aircraft would have eventually taken over regardless. The immediate post WWI era actually saw a great opportunity for airship travel in Europe, and the Zeppelin company was building passenger airships. However, when the Treaty of Versailles came into effect they had to hand them over to Entente militaries, and wouldn’t get to build another Zeppelin for years. They did try though, and for a short time there was trans-Atlantic Zeppelin service. The Hindenburg and the Graf Zeppelin airships made a number of flights across the Atlantic. Yes, the Hindenburg disaster was not its maiden flight.

  • @elliottw1
    @elliottw1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This story was very personal for me too. I inherited several pieces of the airship Akron which encountered a similar fate. Thank you for telling the story.

  • @zulubeatz1
    @zulubeatz1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video wins my most interesting Historical youtube film award. The Narrator is excellent and the film and plan material used is Jaw dropping. Thank you Paper Skies.

  • @rogerb5615
    @rogerb5615 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ 18:20 ... one of those emails in my spambox promising to enlarge my airship. The best line of the week. Thanks, mate!

  • @MRWALKER500000
    @MRWALKER500000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Built very near to were i live in howden. Think my great great grandparents were involved in the construction. Nothing much left of it now, although you can still seen the remains of the sidings at howden Station that used to branch off to the airship complex

  • @christopping5876
    @christopping5876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fantastic documentary with amazing video footage. Two very interesting books on the subject I read many years ago were "The Millionth Chance" by James Leasor (R101 bias) and "Slide Rule" an autobiography of Neville Shute , who was also a design engineer on the R100 project.

  • @zulubeatz1
    @zulubeatz1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    New favorite channel. This is so well done and presented.

  • @admirald2680
    @admirald2680 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderful video, well done Bill 👏

  • @mustang5132
    @mustang5132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Your thumbnails are some of the best I’ve ever seen. Great thumbnail for a great video!

  • @timfortune9
    @timfortune9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "To ride the storm to an Empire of the Clouds. To ride the storm, they climbed aboard their silver ghost. To ride the storm to a kingdom that will come. To ride the storm and damn the rest oblivion. Royalty and dignitaries, brandy and cigars, gray lady giant of the skies, you hold them in your arms. The millionth chance they laughed to take down His Majesty's craft. To India they say, magic carpet float away. An October fateful day..." - Iron Maiden "Empire of the Clouds"

  • @JesusBehindtheWheel
    @JesusBehindtheWheel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I LOVE THIS CHANNEL. Fascinating history. Thank you. That was a mind blowing fact!

  • @MrJacksonBollock
    @MrJacksonBollock 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely brilliant video.
    Hugely underated channel.

  • @christopherr.2137
    @christopherr.2137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I had never heard the reasoning behind the choice of hydrogen over helium was based on lifting capability I have always heard it framed as US would not sell other nations like German Helium because they considered it a vital military resource. I am so happy I have found your corner of TH-cam great channel which I doubt will remain "little" much longer Well Done

    • @Simon_Nonymous
      @Simon_Nonymous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hydrogen was also ever so cheap to produce in the volumes needed - this would have been a good addition to the video - helium really was not an option.

    • @tkmiller_author
      @tkmiller_author 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Helium act of 1925 forbid the export of helium but yes, at any road, hydrogen gave more lift. That said, helium might have been safer. 😊

    • @jimdaw65
      @jimdaw65 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A chemist writes: Hydrogen is diatomic, whereas helium is monatomic. What that means, in practical terms, is that the helium "molecule" is half the size of hydrogen, and is therefore much more likely to leak. For the scientists among us, 31 picometres vs 53. The other reasons stated still apply, by the way; I'm not trying to start an argument :-)

  • @andrewwenzel3600
    @andrewwenzel3600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The two hangars at Cardington are a sight to see, I drive past them frequently and can only imagine what those bohemoths must have looked like. Those hangars are HUGE!

  • @bunion8579
    @bunion8579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is one of the best and most informative videos on airships I've seen. Explains perfectly why in the day they went with hydrogen over helium. Thanks for posting this.

  • @balljointfd3s
    @balljointfd3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just found your channel and have been binge watching your videos. You are a amazing story teller and I cannot fathom why you only have 70Kish Subs! Keep it up! This is amazing content!

  • @WindowsXPMapping1
    @WindowsXPMapping1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Hindenburg: I am the most tragic airship disaster in history
    R-101: hold my engine...
    oh... sh-t

    • @die1mayer
      @die1mayer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hindenburg was a amazing machine which performed 63 successful flights with a flight distance of 335,000 km, it was a tragedy because its destruction was caused by crew error and the German Zeppelin Transport Company was moving towards profitability with Graf Zeppelin and Hindenburg.
      The R-101 was a piece of shit which couldn't even survive its first flight, a deeply flawed machine.

    • @ZaHandle
      @ZaHandle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@die1mayer Zeppelin transport company has more in common with modern computers than their zeppelins does

    • @die1mayer
      @die1mayer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@ZaHandle Imperial Airships have more in common with Chinese Knock-Offs.

    • @Logovanni
      @Logovanni 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@die1mayer unsurprising attitude coming from
      Someone displaying a reichsadler.

    • @callumwilliams1449
      @callumwilliams1449 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@die1mayer A deeply flawed machine describes the entirety of airships and the tragedy is the loss of life, not the loss of the airship and the loss of profits for the company, what the hell?
      You're pretending the Hindenburg was anything other than that because it made 63 flights? Just over a year since it's first flight it was destroyed and kill over half on board. The Hindenburg and all airships like it were disasters.

  • @danamcdonnell9064
    @danamcdonnell9064 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As usual with Paper Skies, informative and entertaining, outlining a tragedy with lessons that are still valuable today. I have to admit that I did have to stop the video to laugh when he mentioned that the British did not employ an email in their spam folder telling them how to enlarge their airship though!

  • @kewl851
    @kewl851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    yall, the picture and explanation of the airships in the sky mixed w airplanes is wild. a fabulous reminder that truth is stranger than fiction. I wish for my fellow Americans that they will see this...for more reason than one...

    • @owenkegg5608
      @owenkegg5608 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As opposed to USA Norwegians?

    • @kewl851
      @kewl851 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@owenkegg5608 ok, I just realized I said that haha

  • @kenth151
    @kenth151 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy does a great job of getting into the details. Second video of his I have watched and have learned so much.

  • @Sideshownicful
    @Sideshownicful 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    21:30 There is a single reason that lead to the R101 crash: Government meddling. If the designers of the R101 had been given the time to test the ship instead of being pushed to do a mission they could not accomplish, this may not have happened.

  • @lexington505
    @lexington505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Helium also wasn't available, as the US had a monopoly on its production (as a byproduct of natural gas production) and Congress banned its export under the Helium Act (1925) in order to ensure, among other things, adequate supply for US navy airships. In the 1920s and 1930s the navy experimented with rigid airships for long range reconnaissance, and during World War II large numbers of nonrigid airships (blimps) were used for anti submarine patrols on both coasts.

  • @angelachouinard4581
    @angelachouinard4581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like that you included that part about where the scrap went to. There was a whole after story of psychic events around the R- 101 that involved Arthur Conan Doyle and several other well known people. I saw your video last night about the Yu- 104 crash and after only a few minutes I subscribed. Your work work is fascinating, really detailed and professional. I enjoyed very much so far and will now catch up on all. Thanks

  • @hillarysemails1615
    @hillarysemails1615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Magnificent and entertaining instructional video.
    We so often hear about German and US Navy airships. These British airships are often overlooked.
    Thank you for all of the hard work that you lovingly put into these wonderful vids.

  • @tomg5187
    @tomg5187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know about this from the Dr Who 8th doctor audio series from big finish, “Storm Warning”. It’s good to remember these things. Thank you.

  • @Fsrjtyttzma
    @Fsrjtyttzma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can only imagine in horror when the first German Zeppelin air attack happened in Hull 1915. Unseen it slipped in during nightfall and dropped bombs which was to be the first aerial attack on British soil. People must have been in utter panic.

  • @securityrobot
    @securityrobot 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    An excellent programme, packed with detail. Fascinating stuff.

  • @adriendecroy7254
    @adriendecroy7254 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great production, very interesting to get the extra tid-bits like how the engineers fared tending the engines, and the cost and process of making the hydrogen bags. Well done!

  • @chrismoule7242
    @chrismoule7242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is a well-researched and presented story. I remember a succinct and similar article about this in the Airfix magazine in the early-to-mid 1960s. This contractual and constructional debacle was one of the main things to convince me that Government-led projects were always doomed to be either technological failures or well over budget, or both. I have seen nothing in the UK since to change my mind.

  • @profpep
    @profpep 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for another great video. A book also worth reading is Nevil Shute's autobiography 'Slide Rule'. He was a 'computer', (a human calculator), for the R100 project, under Barnes Wallis, whose 'geodetic' contruction was used in its design. He had a lot to say about the failure of R101, especially the way the designers were boxed in by political decisions.

    • @nilsnilsnilsify
      @nilsnilsnilsify 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agreed, that was a great book. Mr. Shute definitely had strong ideas about the role of private industry vs. government. Also just a great engineer's story.

  • @Zatsuiki
    @Zatsuiki 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh wow. You're really pumping out videos quickly! You're doing great work and I'm sure your channel is going to explode even more than it already did in its (apparently) short life.

  • @estern001
    @estern001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! The same metal in two crashes. With receipts. Thank you, sir!

  • @RichieWellock
    @RichieWellock 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    im loving this content, thanx very enjoyable .. (Comet ? , avro Tudor ? next ) ive been to the abandoned avro plant recent in my video. shame it got shut down

    • @PaperSkiesAviation
      @PaperSkiesAviation  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I know. It's always very sad when air plants are closing and dying. Especially those that have a long history.
      To be honest, I wasn't aware about Avro Tudor. I do have Avro Canada Arrow in my list, though. But you gave me something I can search and read about now. Will see, may be I can make a story out of that.
      Thank you, Richie!

    • @RichieWellock
      @RichieWellock 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tudor very unknown but it preceded the comet , started as a prop plane on the same development of the Lancaster bomber, the Tudor would have overtaken the comet except the tragedy of a crash that killed its very famous designer Mr Roy Chadwick C.B.E its a interesting sorry. Ive watched the avro Arrow . brill

    • @The_Modeling_Underdog
      @The_Modeling_Underdog 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RichieWellock Agreed on the Tudor. Would make for an excellent video, indeed. Those aerodynamic forces. Cheers.

  • @johnjephcote7636
    @johnjephcote7636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Read 'The Millionth Chance' by James Leasor. The best account I have ever read on this subject. He wrote it in the 1950s when many of the people involved in the project were still alive and even working.

  • @adamfrazer5150
    @adamfrazer5150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @1:33 don't think I've ever seen this footage until now- actually took me a few moments before I knew what I was looking at, very cool 👍🍻

  • @noahschneider400
    @noahschneider400 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the first time I've seen this channel. Got to say I really like your style of storytelling and explaining the info

  • @robertdragoff6909
    @robertdragoff6909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That coincidence between the R101 and the Hindenburg is second only to the eerie Lincoln/ Kennedy one.

    • @SuperHeatherMorris
      @SuperHeatherMorris 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not sure there is much coincidence between the two, other than they both ended up on the ground. The R101 flew, out of control, into the ground, the Hindenburg caught fire and then sank to the ground.

    • @steve-ph9yg
      @steve-ph9yg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only coincidence I see is the hydrogen caught fire and exploded in both of them for different reasons.

    • @SuperHeatherMorris
      @SuperHeatherMorris 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@steve-ph9yg Just a technical point, the hydrogen burned, it did not explode. You will only get a hydrogen explosion if it is fully mixed with air (well, oxygen really) before it is ignited.

  • @167curly
    @167curly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a young woman, my mother saw the R101 flying over London on its last flight.

  • @billynomates920
    @billynomates920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    forgot about R101 - thanks for the reminder and great video!

  • @halepauhana153
    @halepauhana153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, I love the history of the airships. Look for Nevil Shute's "Slide Rule", an account of when he was an engineer working on the building of the R-100, he rode on it to Canada and back. Incredible history!

  • @aeroearth
    @aeroearth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The successful R100 airship was built by the Vickers Co. at Howden, Yorks. The Chief Designer was one very young (23 years old I believe) brilliant Engineer called Barnes Wallis, who went on to design many other things including the Vickers Wellington Bomber, the Dambusters bouncing bomb and the Tallboy earthquake bomb. Chief Stressman or "Calculator" with his two Assistants (who did all their calculations on slide rules in those days) was one Neville Shute Norway. Later to become co founder and Managing Director of the Airspeed Aircraft Co. Then famous author under the name of Neville Shute.
    In Neville Shute Norway's autobiography "Slide Rule" Neville describes how ALL the design decisions of the R100 HAD to be vetted by the Air MInistry. However ALL the design decisions of the failed R101 were vetted by the Air Ministry for the same Minster responsible for its design. This was a "socialist" government, lets not forget.
    The R100 was very successful and made its maiden voyage across the Atlantic to Toronto, Canada and back to Cardington. After the R101 failure it could also have successfully made the voyage to India too, but the Labour Government of the day vetoed that of course and as a symbol of a successful "capitalist" venture vs. a failed "socialist" one, had it scrapped.
    The Airship shed at Howden was dismantled and transported by road to Cardington where it was reassembled next to the failed R101 shed and the two hangers are still there today.

    • @richardstuart325
      @richardstuart325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Slide Rule" is a superb book, with a very perceptive description of the events and decisions leading to the R101's disastrous end.

    • @Simon_Nonymous
      @Simon_Nonymous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As soon as anyone says "this was of course due to socialism" you can, if you wish, disregard anything they say from then on as they might just have a political agenda, let alone debate whether the Labour government of that time could actually be called socialist, with a big S, or even a little one. . Let's just put it this way - how many capitalist/fascist/non-socialist countries made a success out of airships for intercontinental travel in the 20s and 30s. I will buy you a pint of beer for each one who did.

    • @aeroearth
      @aeroearth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Simon_Nonymous Comrade Simon Nonymous! Ah yes mark of a true communist! NOWHERE did I say "this was of course due to socialism" Most regrettably I have come to expect that of communists/socialists or whatever they choose to currently call themselves. Misquote people and then "cancel" people opposed to their murderous ideology, as indeed history proves to be true.
      I am curious. Do the communists pay you to post such misleading comments or do you do it out of a misguided sense of ideology?

    • @SAHBfan
      @SAHBfan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just a minor point, if anyone cares, Barnes Wallis did NOT design the Wellington bomber, despite this misconception being repeated in many publications and sources. His geodetic construction technique was used in five Vickers aircraft designs, I believe, but the actual aircraft designer was Reginald 'Rex' Pearson.

    • @davidstroup100
      @davidstroup100 ปีที่แล้ว

      BRAVO! Nevil Shute's "Slide Rule" is a must for historians covering this subject. ...a first person account of the "conservative" and successful completion of the contract. R-100 was not perfect, but compaired to its' politically driven rival, and following efforts.... History may not repeat itself, but it does rhyme. 👍

  • @devingraves8044
    @devingraves8044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Blew mind when I found out that metal from this airship was used for the Hindenburg construction

  • @Steve-GM0HUU
    @Steve-GM0HUU 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative - thank you.👍 Quality video, you have got yourself another subscriber.

  • @devikwolf
    @devikwolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, and cool to see the mention of Bill Hammack! One of my favorite engineering communicators!

  • @decimated550
    @decimated550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:51 wow epic scene of 4 airships taking off at once! in a brief period when airships had more payload than airplanes.

    • @owenkegg5608
      @owenkegg5608 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are 5 airships taking off in that clip lol.

  • @bcfairlie1
    @bcfairlie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is a great video. Although I am very familiar with the history of R101, I loved seeing all this footage. I have been fascinated by rigid Airships since I was a little boy. Not one of my fellow school students or friends could ever understand why. I feel that the even greater tragedy was having the R100 dismantled. So much potential lost to cheap politics.

  • @thecodex0994
    @thecodex0994 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the second video of yours ive come across i love the animation you've added to them

  • @pattywolford
    @pattywolford 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent! The pilots’ working space and the passenger boarding system! New subscribed

  • @surprisedchar2458
    @surprisedchar2458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Seems like combining large vehicles and the term “maiden voyage” is something of a curse for the Brits.

    • @KebabMusicLtd
      @KebabMusicLtd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not necessarily... Being an island race we greatly relied on our sea power and over the centuries there have been many great ships that flew the British flag and lasted long beyond their maiden voyage (including the Cutty Sark, HMS Defiance, The Mayflower, The Dogs Hind Quarters etc)
      We cetainly aren't the only country to lose an airship or a ship at sea. Indeed, the Titanic was an American owned ship (IMM)

    • @suburbia2050
      @suburbia2050 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KebabMusicLtd What?! No it wasn't, it was owned by White Star Line

  • @hanslebrutal4693
    @hanslebrutal4693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    RIP the AN-225...

  • @ammerudgrenda
    @ammerudgrenda ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for great presentation!

  • @Ravenfort
    @Ravenfort 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quite new sub here. I really like the quality of your channel. Thanks for the videos

  • @arthurdavies7407
    @arthurdavies7407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    cursed metal

  • @BarisHalac
    @BarisHalac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Empire of the clouds..

    • @davekp6773
      @davekp6773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bruce Dickinson’s masterpiece.

  • @christopherbatty3837
    @christopherbatty3837 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well presented & good source material.
    Additional reading: "The Millionth Chance" by Lessor. "The Airmen Who Would Not Die". And Sir Peter Masefield's excellent tome.

  • @peterlarkin762
    @peterlarkin762 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Never knew dudes worked in airship's engine bays. Brave (and deaf) engineers. Amazing paper Skies doesn't have more subscribers, quality stuff.

  • @KarlBunker
    @KarlBunker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How *NOT* to conduct a test flight of an experimental aircraft: Load it up with lots of government and industry VIPs and set off for a destination thousands of miles away. 🙄

    • @owenkegg5608
      @owenkegg5608 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      An X craft BUILT ENTIRELY BY THE GOVERNMENT. Truly horrifying.

  • @ConsumerWatchdogUK
    @ConsumerWatchdogUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When somebody tells you "this was made by the government" that should be all the warning you need.

    • @goawayleavemealone2880
      @goawayleavemealone2880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed.

    • @callummckeown4815
      @callummckeown4815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are numerous instances where private companies have designed and built something that turned out to be a disaster.

    • @ConsumerWatchdogUK
      @ConsumerWatchdogUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@callummckeown4815 So what?

  • @paulmk2290
    @paulmk2290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video with plenty of footage that I haven't seen before. I live near Cardington and have been inside one of the hangars, they are massive. I always look for the progress of the Hybrid Air Vehicles' blimp that is being built inside the same hanger, but the first production model is still a long way off, I believe. Helium this time around.

  • @adrianbabino8580
    @adrianbabino8580 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing story. Thank You very much!!