Modern Java in Action

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มี.ค. 2024
  • Let's write a GitHub Crawler and let's throw in everything Java (21) has to offer:
    ◦ virtual threads and structured concurrency,
    ◦ pattern matching and data-oriented programming,
    ◦ type inference, records, and sealed types,
    ◦ text blocks and template strings,
    ◦ a modern HTTP client and improved collections,
    ◦ modules and OS-specific binaries.
    The end result will look very different from just a few years ago, let alone 10. This is not your dad's Java!
    Presented by Nicolai Parlog (Oracle)
    Recorded at Jfokus 2024 ➱ www.jfokus.se
    ◦ Inside.java ➱ inside.java
    ◦ Dev.java ➱ dev.java
    Tags: #Java #JDK #OpenJDK
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 70

  • @TheBigLou13
    @TheBigLou13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    20:00 I would be interested in a dedicated video to these reflection capabilities.
    Great talk/presentation, showing a lot of the new features in a connected way while also giving some additional information about them and their usages/options/capabilites/benefits!

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That dedicated video is not a bad idea, I'll put it on the list. 😊 If you want to look into it yourself, check out Class::getRecordComponents: docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/Class.html#getRecordComponents()

  • @ihor_biedin
    @ihor_biedin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great video! Thanks, Nicolai!

  • @c00ckiez
    @c00ckiez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Banger video, love coding sessions like this. Keep it up!

  • @javaRelated
    @javaRelated 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thanks Nicolai, Great Talk as expected.

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you!

  • @asd-xr9ii
    @asd-xr9ii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great, thanks!

  • @jfkwasnoscope
    @jfkwasnoscope 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good talk Nicolai, love the frequent uploads on the channel.

  • @andmal8
    @andmal8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you!

  • @nuclearscissors
    @nuclearscissors 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great talk! Loved the structured concurrency bit, pattern matching (blew my mind a few times in the talk with how awesome the code looks with it), string templates and other new features overall. Java 21 has really upped it's game in terms of neat tricks that make the life easier.

  • @edgardcz
    @edgardcz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    KUDOS! Awesome presentation! and remarkable job from the Java team!
    Please guys, bring the null check with ? and something similar to elvis operator to the lenguage!

  • @hoo5886
    @hoo5886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    awesome

  • @prdoyle
    @prdoyle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    30:42 - RIP string templates

  • @muzzletov
    @muzzletov 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i used ktor for that exact purpose. i feel like, oracle took a lot of inspiration from kotlin.

  • @ambrozykleks626
    @ambrozykleks626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good job, friend

  • @DamLee88
    @DamLee88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great!

  • @badpotato
    @badpotato 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice viewo

  • @prdoyle
    @prdoyle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great talk!
    Editor - looking at Nicolai is cool and all, but you need to keep showing the code or we can't follow along.

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree! But the video was edited live at Jfokus (for their live stream) as you see it here and we don't have access to the original source files to re-edit. 🫤

  • @dmitriimoldavanov4701
    @dmitriimoldavanov4701 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    36:04 Pretty.pageList -> what if page is null? Should we put additional check for that?

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can just add a `case null ->` to the switch if you want to handle that case. Otherwise the switch will throw a NullPointerException.

  • @octaviantheodor
    @octaviantheodor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super lovely, thanks! But "abusive," indeed :) Imagine handling a new type of GH page... How many switch-es were there?

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's not the abusive part, though. 😉 If every switch were instead a method on `Page`, adding a new type of pages requires you to implement all operations. If `Page` used the visitor pattern, adding a new type of pages requires you to update all visitors (i.e. operations). Here, adding a new type of pages requires you to update all switches (i.e. operations). There's no escape from this (unless you want some operations to execute a default action for all new types that are ever added).

    • @octaviantheodor
      @octaviantheodor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fair enough :)

  • @BrazenNL
    @BrazenNL 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    12:10 `git eradicate`?

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll have to look up the exact alias, but what it does is revert all changes and delete all untracked files.

    • @BrazenNL
      @BrazenNL 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@nipafx Oh, right, an alias. 🤦

  • @iogilarb
    @iogilarb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haa... Java

  • @NineInchTyrone
    @NineInchTyrone หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is Java modern COBOL ?

  • @rahulvijay1781
    @rahulvijay1781 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have 1yr of experience as a java developer..after i see this video makes me think i am a joke 🤡

    • @nipafx
      @nipafx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Don't think that. A year of experience is a great point to be productive and to really start to understand the language and its ecosystem. Stick with it! And keep in mind that the talk was prepared and rehearsed with the express goal to make the code look good.

    • @JamesStansell
      @JamesStansell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Everyone has to start somewhere! One thing about programming is that there is always more to learn ⭐

    • @rahulvijay1781
      @rahulvijay1781 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thankyou guys it means a lot ♥️

    • @thiagogeisler8715
      @thiagogeisler8715 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nipafx Hello, Nicolai. You could consider taking the JAVA team to open a project to research a deterministic memory management system to be used by developers who need low memory consumption and develop real-time systems. I have seen some languages ​​that have adopted deterministic memory management, such as MOJO, Rust, Swift, and NIM. Nim, for example, adopts a system called ORC. It's just that some of us didn't want to have to leave this wonderful JAVA ecosystem for any other language, not even temporarily to make system-level applications.

    • @silentprotagonist3786
      @silentprotagonist3786 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nipafx I just started learning Java seriously a week ago and this lowkey gives me hope 😹

  • @jfkwasnoscope
    @jfkwasnoscope 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The string interpolation is still super ugly and should be replaced and yes I read the explanation for this incredibly unpractical and ugly design in the jep. It's not just a "small amount of convenience" that we're missing out on.

  • @AnimatedV
    @AnimatedV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These highly professional people have no concept of quality screencasts, do they? The wastage of time in Java community is like no other. Untangling complexities too remains elusive.

  • @krellin
    @krellin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    records immutable = bad
    copyOf just to make immutable list = bad
    we had better solutions for all of this long time ago

    • @avalagum7957
      @avalagum7957 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Could you please tell us what, you think, is better?

    • @krellin
      @krellin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@avalagum7957 sure, records forcing you immutability is bad because for most it means boilerplate code, shit performance (no resue from cpu caches after you mutate) lots of garbage (which is less of a problem, cos gcs are very good these days)...
      what they should have done is give you options, if you want immutable declare your fields as val or var like kotlin...
      immutability is very niche technique that mostly library devs should use not general public... good example is string, more good examples? hard to come by

    • @krellin
      @krellin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@avalagum7957 copyOF sucks, because it actually will copy unless underlying was immutable already... instead kotlin solved it better yet again... List = Immutable version, no mutator methods, MutalbeList = MutableVersion....
      You can simply return List even though underlying is mutable (so you do a free downcast)... and if a developer goes out of his way to cast it back to mutable and mutate it then its his problem...
      Again they are lazy and dont do the work even though jetbrains showed them years ago how its done properly.

    • @krellin
      @krellin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@avalagum7957 if records were some sort of C type data structures packed in memory i would understand immutability, because you cannot predict length of some fields to count pointers... but all it does is forces you to use immutable pojos... why tf would you force it, i dont know...
      My only guess is laziness + since they are in the a cloud provider club, they do not want you to write efficient software that does more with less...
      This code looks like shit, and i didnt watch further.
      As a java dev it pisses me off that they make short sighted decisions to hit their 6 month schedule, even when good tested solutions to these problems are already out there for many years.

    • @cosmowanda6460
      @cosmowanda6460 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@krellinyou're right, records force immutability. But isn't that what they were created for?
      If you want to modify your classes everytime, then records are clearly not what you should use.
      If the jvm works like any other language though, anything that's immutable should help the compiler make more optimization.
      val and var isn't the good example you think it is. They could have used literally any other names that didn't look so identical.
      If I remember Kotlin correctly, its concept of immutability is also similar to java in that the reference is still mutable. So val in Kotlin, is really just final in java.

  • @hersh2
    @hersh2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    why intellij? eclipse is better for java

    • @Quillraven
      @Quillraven 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😂😂😂

    • @bboykilo
      @bboykilo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😆😆Hell nahh

    • @silentprotagonist3786
      @silentprotagonist3786 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The choice of IDE doesn't matter bro

    • @meilyn22
      @meilyn22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Eclipse is better than Intellij? You must be from another planet to believe that.

    • @hersh2
      @hersh2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@meilyn22 no, why? i like the workspace concept in eclipse more. also the content assist and hovers are much better. also intellij is not building incrementally, making it slow if i run the program. because it then starts compiling. when i delete a method, the other class which is not open and where the usage of the method is, will not be marked red in the file explorer. this is really unacceptable. intellij is for beginners imo.