i guess im asking randomly but does someone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account?? I stupidly lost the password. I would love any tips you can give me.
@Henrik Alexis thanks so much for your reply. I found the site thru google and Im waiting for the hacking stuff now. I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
We had this feature in After Effects CS6 in 2012. So we've been waiting for it to be reintroduced for over 9 years. The rendering works, according to your information in the Reder Queue of After Effects. If you look at the last After Effects versions up to the 2021 version, only a very limited codec use is possible in this render queue. The more important codecs are reached via the media encoder, so the whole thing is a cheat pack. Unfortunately, ADOBE has still not managed to interpret the DNxHR 444 codec correctly with the new AE 2021, so that gama shifts occur in the workflow. That's not great for me yet, I hope for AE 2022.
The original "multi-frame" was running multiple instances of AE, which i think was coincidentally not as efficient... Also, why not use ProRes4444? It's been a minute since I've done side my side codec tests, but I feel like ProRes is a good 2nd option for you...
@@LearnHowToEditStuff Large productions that many different artists work on are more often made with MXF containers and, for example, the DNxHR 444 codec. In addition, TV stations like to work with MXF XDcam HD, these things are not supported as well. The renderer of CS6 has always been faster on professional workstations than what has come from ADOBE up to now (without beta). ADOBE is more specialized in laptops and I-MACs. I mean machines with dual processors and 4x graphics cards, in which DaVinci renders with multiple real-time.
Large productions have their own workflows and usually use render farms that output image sequences. And usually one would export a master file and do any deliverables with that instead of trying to export them directly.
"Time is money" is the reason some of us including me have stuck to CC 2014 for so long due to being the last version with built-in multicore rendering. So great they are adding it back finally but it should have never disappeared to begin with. Oh well patience has been rewarded and the newer versions have added so little vs how much they've taken out with multicore processing rendering so it's always been the easiest call to hold off from upgrading especially if rendering videos daily, finally I will be able to upgrade though. :P EDIT: Does seem a bit unoptimized still though judging from those results. Using CC2014 with multicore processing vs CC2015 - CC2020 usually at the very least gives some quadruple improvements, sometimes a bit more but yea around 20 - 25 mins vs ~1 hr or something for music video template I use.
@@melomaniakjm I haven't encountered any plugins I've needed that didn't work with CC2014 and upgrading would be my very very last resort. On the opposite side, I'd say content creators have switched too lightly towards newer CC versions so Adobe have gotten away with it for too miniscule changes. Should have put down the foot harder to force Adobe to do something about it sooner. The new function what I've seen so far cannot compare to the old multicore rendering performance so I'm not personally ready to switch yet.
2X(or more) speed on rather complicated projects I was finding, but for general mograph type stuff i was seeing 4x or higher. I think multi-frame rendering is REALLY gonna be something when it get integrated into previewing in After Effects.
I have a 3960X and with MFR on the Adobe Test- Project rendered around 3 x faster directly in After Effects (CPU at 100%) ...But when I tried Media Encoder I gor even faster results without MFR!!!!🤭 ...and the CPU went in Media Encoder never over 30%🤭 ...I guess there are still some Problems with MFR 🙄
My guess is that all the effects they've been moving to the GPU over the years has made it so it's not as directly related to core count. An indicator of this, is that they're not calling it the old name, "multi-processing," and have instead opted to call it the more generic, "multi-frame rendering," because it likely uses multiple threads to queue up frames on the GPU and CPU resources that usually go unused.
@@GuyVanBogart Don't think the frames are really queued up between GPU and CPU because my 24 CPU cores worked in the Adobe MFR test project all the time at 100% and the GPU only from time to time (only when a GPU Effects is applied?), was mostly at 0-10% and never went over 40%.
Nice feature...greatly needed! But did you know that if you import AE seq in Premiere and then render it eighter in Premiere or Media Encoder (from Premiere), u already have 3x faster render :) No need of RenderGarden or BGRenderer :) Plus you'll have a spare processor power - CPU utilization is in 30-60% :)
So groundbreaking and mind blowing to make your software do something it should have been doing for the past decade...and this is only a 2x speedup when there's always at least 75% cpu headroom when rendering. I think I remember that it used to do this until Adobe took it away for some reason. I can't say I'm not a little pissed that I've needed to do workarounds with multiple instances of AE and use unreliable render farm software. If Adobe wants to impress me they can refund thousands of dollars I've spent over the years losing valuable work time waiting for renders when they could have been on this issue years ago. And they can also work on AE chewing through all 128 gb of my ram every few minutes.
@@LearnHowToEditStuff haha it just really irritated me to see a big deal made out of something that should be no big deal. That's not your fault, is Adobe's fault. Making your software use more cpu power isn't a monumental achievement... That's all I'm saying.
when is this going to be the normal after effects release and it works??? is this going to be available soon or is this going on for over a year in "beta"
Well it's about time and it's not even here for RAM preview and still i n Beta for export...so not so excited for something that was there and removed in 2014...took adobe 7 years to just start reintroducing this feature...
We used to have this in both preview and final render mode back in CS6. I never "upgraded" since CS6 for this exact reason. When you have up to 32x cores available, there is no competition between CS6 and CC. A shot that would take 10 minutes to render in CC, renders in under a minute in CS6. Adobe is idiotic for willfully depriving its customers of this feature for this long.
bro please make a video on priemier pro vs davinciv resolve vs final cut pro and after effects vs davinci resolve fusion vs pro motion and audition vs resolve audio page vs final cut pro please please please.........
![I Replaced ALL my ADOBE APPS with these [free or cheaper] Alternatives!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5EfqHg49kMk/mqdefault.jpg)
![I Replaced ALL my ADOBE APPS with these [free or cheaper] Alternatives!](/img/tr.png)
sub to him right now! and great news!
This guy gets it.
i guess im asking randomly but does someone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account??
I stupidly lost the password. I would love any tips you can give me.
@Dexter Kash instablaster :)
@Henrik Alexis thanks so much for your reply. I found the site thru google and Im waiting for the hacking stuff now.
I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Henrik Alexis It worked and I finally got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
Thank you so much you saved my ass :D
We had this feature in After Effects CS6 in 2012. So we've been waiting for it to be reintroduced for over 9 years.
The rendering works, according to your information in the Reder Queue of After Effects.
If you look at the last After Effects versions up to the 2021 version, only a very limited codec use is possible in this render queue.
The more important codecs are reached via the media encoder, so the whole thing is a cheat pack. Unfortunately,
ADOBE has still not managed to interpret the DNxHR 444 codec correctly with the new AE 2021,
so that gama shifts occur in the workflow.
That's not great for me yet, I hope for AE 2022.
The original "multi-frame" was running multiple instances of AE, which i think was coincidentally not as efficient... Also, why not use ProRes4444? It's been a minute since I've done side my side codec tests, but I feel like ProRes is a good 2nd option for you...
@@LearnHowToEditStuff Large productions that many different artists
work on are more often made with MXF containers and,
for example, the DNxHR 444 codec.
In addition, TV stations like to work with MXF XDcam HD, these things are not supported as well.
The renderer of CS6 has always been faster on professional workstations than what has come from ADOBE up to now (without beta).
ADOBE is more specialized in laptops and I-MACs.
I mean machines with dual processors and 4x graphics cards,
in which DaVinci renders with multiple real-time.
Large productions have their own workflows and usually use render farms that output image sequences. And usually one would export a master file and do any deliverables with that instead of trying to export them directly.
@@LearnHowToEditStuff The original "Multi-Frame"
Here you could have several files of a file chain rendered on one machine
@@Terjay It doesn't matter whether it is a large or small production, if ADOBE codec interprets incorrectly, this leads to errors and problems.
"Time is money" is the reason some of us including me have stuck to CC 2014 for so long due to being the last version with built-in multicore rendering. So great they are adding it back finally but it should have never disappeared to begin with. Oh well patience has been rewarded and the newer versions have added so little vs how much they've taken out with multicore processing rendering so it's always been the easiest call to hold off from upgrading especially if rendering videos daily, finally I will be able to upgrade though. :P EDIT: Does seem a bit unoptimized still though judging from those results. Using CC2014 with multicore processing vs CC2015 - CC2020 usually at the very least gives some quadruple improvements, sometimes a bit more but yea around 20 - 25 mins vs ~1 hr or something for music video template I use.
Yes but you can't stay with CC2014. Lots of plugins don't work.
@@melomaniakjm I haven't encountered any plugins I've needed that didn't work with CC2014 and upgrading would be my very very last resort. On the opposite side, I'd say content creators have switched too lightly towards newer CC versions so Adobe have gotten away with it for too miniscule changes. Should have put down the foot harder to force Adobe to do something about it sooner. The new function what I've seen so far cannot compare to the old multicore rendering performance so I'm not personally ready to switch yet.
2X speed up on a 3950X? Don't get me wrong, cutting your time in half is impressive , but you'd think with that many cores it'd be more.
2X(or more) speed on rather complicated projects I was finding, but for general mograph type stuff i was seeing 4x or higher. I think multi-frame rendering is REALLY gonna be something when it get integrated into previewing in After Effects.
I have a 3960X and with MFR on the Adobe Test- Project rendered around 3 x faster directly in After Effects (CPU at 100%) ...But when I tried Media Encoder I gor even faster results without MFR!!!!🤭 ...and the CPU went in Media Encoder never over 30%🤭 ...I guess there are still some Problems with MFR 🙄
My guess is that all the effects they've been moving to the GPU over the years has made it so it's not as directly related to core count. An indicator of this, is that they're not calling it the old name, "multi-processing," and have instead opted to call it the more generic, "multi-frame rendering," because it likely uses multiple threads to queue up frames on the GPU and CPU resources that usually go unused.
@@GuyVanBogart Don't think the frames are really queued up between GPU and CPU because my 24 CPU cores worked in the Adobe MFR test project all the time at 100% and the GPU only from time to time (only when a GPU Effects is applied?), was mostly at 0-10% and never went over 40%.
Good to see your face again! I have been out of it but now that I have a beast pc I am back at trying to learn !
If they keep evolving like this, I believe there will be AI Ae in the future
The same idea, so when do your next video come out
AI effects
I’m excited for multi-frame rendering. I’ll try it out 😁
2021 Will be great for editors 😍🥰
how do you update ? im sorry!
Good news everyone!
so in the AE render queue - which spits out HUGE files OMFG.
i need to find out how to get decent file size from the renderer within AE.
Use media encoder! You can export to an H.264 file!
@@LearnHowToEditStuff yes, but does that use the multi processing feature or ?
Nice feature...greatly needed! But did you know that if you import AE seq in Premiere and then render it eighter in Premiere or Media Encoder (from Premiere), u already have 3x faster render :) No need of RenderGarden or BGRenderer :) Plus you'll have a spare processor power - CPU utilization is in 30-60% :)
hello! am from rwanda, you're great! I appreciate.
You should be viewing each logical core in task manager. To see how it’s really working.
they're already doing great with Adobe sensei in photoshop. it's only a matter of time (maybe months) before we see AI assisted tools in AE
you seem chill
Thanks brother..👍🏻
Hell yea! Great content as always
So groundbreaking and mind blowing to make your software do something it should have been doing for the past decade...and this is only a 2x speedup when there's always at least 75% cpu headroom when rendering. I think I remember that it used to do this until Adobe took it away for some reason. I can't say I'm not a little pissed that I've needed to do workarounds with multiple instances of AE and use unreliable render farm software. If Adobe wants to impress me they can refund thousands of dollars I've spent over the years losing valuable work time waiting for renders when they could have been on this issue years ago. And they can also work on AE chewing through all 128 gb of my ram every few minutes.
... who hurt you ... Mike, this is a safe space.
@@LearnHowToEditStuff haha it just really irritated me to see a big deal made out of something that should be no big deal. That's not your fault, is Adobe's fault. Making your software use more cpu power isn't a monumental achievement... That's all I'm saying.
One day you will hit 1 million
3:28 CPU Usage is still pretty low, compared to 3D Rendering in C4D etc.
OH MAAAAN!!! WHERE DID YOU GET THOSE PILLOWS!!!!!!
Wow
when is this going to be the normal after effects release and it works??? is this going to be available soon or is this going on for over a year in "beta"
I’m using it in beta daily and I love it!
Hi sir
I bought new laptop i9,32gb ram,rtx4090 is it good system to run after effects because i am face lag while preview
there goes your coffee break :/
i have no idea what a multi frame rendering is :-(
Instead of rendering a frame at a time, it renders multiple frames.
Bro I can’t see multi frame rendering option in my software (ae2019)
your brain is absolutely using multi-frame rendering to talk this fast
I'm using 4GB RAM 😭😭😭
Is this feature available in Ae 2021?
What project do you have posted on the wall behind you?
Thank you!
All my effects say "This effect may slow down Preview and Export as it is not optimized for Multi-Frame Rendering." Anyone know how i could fix that?
Well it's about time and it's not even here for RAM preview and still i n Beta for export...so not so excited for something that was there and removed in 2014...took adobe 7 years to just start reintroducing this feature...
Wow That's cool
if you have 2 processors? will it use all cores?
And there are already 3rd party plugins for multi frame rendering. What we need is mutl RAM preview!!!
Its october 2021, have this feature been released officially yet?
yes
i lost my edit :’)
What's the best after effects rendering settings without using Adobe encoder?
Great video.
Render garden :-)?
Waiting for GPU Rending like premiere has
PLUS render queue does not even have option to export to H264! You need after codecs plugin, another 89$. Wonder why Adobe isn't giving AE more love.
Low specs can use??
trying to learn affer effects
How to use this?
We used to have this in both preview and final render mode back in CS6. I never "upgraded" since CS6 for this exact reason. When you have up to 32x cores available, there is no competition between CS6 and CC. A shot that would take 10 minutes to render in CC, renders in under a minute in CS6. Adobe is idiotic for willfully depriving its customers of this feature for this long.
bro please make a video on priemier pro vs davinciv resolve vs final cut pro
and after effects vs davinci resolve fusion vs pro motion
and audition vs resolve audio page vs final cut pro
please please please.........
I don't have a Mac so I cant do FCPX :P
@@LearnHowToEditStuff then you just make the comparison of premier pro vs davinci resolvex and after effects vs davinci resolve fusion page
W A N K E R thumbnail... will use that shit as a shooting target
Try to compare with ae 19 year. New multi frame rendering is slower that ae 19. So, they just made program slower and then fixed this
i love this fuckin guy
That pillow though... That's ultimate clout.
thxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
early gang
Early bird gets the ... early access to AE public beta.
Notiansans plz tell me can I make that Like button blue.
SMASH IT.
@@LearnHowToEditStuff but it will get hurt.🥺
How about softly pressing it?
Fanks Ian
HUGE DOESN'T EVEN DESCRIBE IT
Would be great if it would actually finish a render :-|
PP and AE are BS (no GPU support for effects playback)
Hi can you do a tutorial on @jonyrinko on TIKTOK
i fkn love u
why try so hard to be clever? just give the info without all the childish nonsense