THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF QUANTUM PHYSICS Explained in One Video

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 190

  • @abuabdurrahman8719
    @abuabdurrahman8719 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    I am new to this platform from Nigeria, quietly and also new to the mathematical aspect of Quantum mechanics, in the brief the summary is very interesting to whoever wants to study the new way of introducing and advancing of classical mechanics

  • @billbissenas2973
    @billbissenas2973 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The first three decades of the 20th century were the golden age of physics.

  • @hunterarmstrong4451
    @hunterarmstrong4451 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The ai flows nicely, but a real voice would be a nice touch. Read them before you go to bed. Morgan Freeman says the best quality is when your vocal cords are relaxed

  • @nameless-yd6ko
    @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Learning the 'history' of quantum physics is a far cry from understanding what it is about!
    "Only a Mystical state of mind can even begin to probe the meaning of quantum mechanics!" - Richard Feynman

  • @SabaDhutt
    @SabaDhutt 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I’ve been looking for a video that explains advancements/discoveries in Quantum mechanics in Chronological order. Liked and subscribed. Thank you.

  • @michaelblankenau6598
    @michaelblankenau6598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Beautifully produced and very informative. Congratulations on making these concepts accessible to the layman .

  • @alexandregagnon4132
    @alexandregagnon4132 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I just feel that the over produced visual content doesn't seem to reflect the theories represented. This distraction can make some viewers feel that their points are inaccurate

    • @carlafa3
      @carlafa3 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I respectfully disagree‼Just listen to the words and enjoy the light show = no confusion‼

  • @brainpain5260
    @brainpain5260 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    At 18:33 you show the hydrogen atom with one proton and one nuetron. This is incorrect. Well done all in all though. I've been studying Quantum Mechanics for 40 years and this is an excellent summary with surprising accuracy. I am assuming this is intended novices since theres a lot of images and no equations. Thanks for stimulating the public.

    • @81giorikas
      @81giorikas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tell me different types of detectors in the double slit experiment.
      Also bucky balls is not the limit.

    • @Leadership_matters
      @Leadership_matters หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Are you saying all hydrogen atoms have no neutrons or just the isotope Bohr used?

    • @brainpain5260
      @brainpain5260 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Leadership_matters I'm pointing out that Dueterium is an odd choice to represent the Hydrogen atom. I'm wondering if the creator of these videos understands the science half as well as they understand how to produce visually entertaining images.

  • @mathias4851
    @mathias4851 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Great video.

  • @carlafa3
    @carlafa3 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Thank you, this was really well done and clarified a really difficult subject‼

  • @BlackSheepScreaming
    @BlackSheepScreaming 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Whoooaaa ! New masterpiece !
    Thank you so much ! 🙏😊

  • @lightlegion_
    @lightlegion_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Keep on creating; you’re doing an excellent job!

  • @JohnJohnny-z2y
    @JohnJohnny-z2y 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The david bowie theory is very missunderstude princess professor john can explain it in a stunning way

  • @SeersChannel
    @SeersChannel หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great work but was expecting something on string theory towards the end since it seems to be answering some of the outtro questions.

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    the moon is there when i am not looking it at, because someone else is looking at it.. so its always there because there is always someone looking at it...even if its a mosquito...

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I think you misunderstand the point. Take ALL that life away and then ask, is the moon there. Personally, I feel it's a dumb question asked only by physicist that don't understand what an observer actually is. Every atom can be an observer, if it absorbs a photon or interacts with another particle in anyway its an observer. If we take that away, then no the moon wouldn't be there because all other particles in the universe would no exist.

    • @donaldwhittaker7987
      @donaldwhittaker7987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Even if nobody is observing a thing the thing can still be there. An object does not require an observer to exist. To suggest otherwise is absurd.

    • @justinrogers1807
      @justinrogers1807 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Everyday is a full moon people don't understand shadows and atmosphere

    • @v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096
      @v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If the moon wasn't there when nobody looked, the tides would swell the poles.

    • @susanwerb7962
      @susanwerb7962 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@donaldwhittaker7987 not at all. It's consciousness theory. Self can observe self. The universe is both creator and observer (perceiver, measurer)

  • @Steve-v8t3t
    @Steve-v8t3t หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The AI voice doesn’t bother me at all. Clear, concise, and effective at stating the science. The people freaking out over a voice are definitely not scientists.

    • @TheZombiehouseful
      @TheZombiehouseful หลายเดือนก่อน

      True

    • @justinunion7586
      @justinunion7586 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Honestly I didn’t even notice. We’ve made great strides in the last 3 years with A.I voice synthesis.

    • @robertopacheco2943
      @robertopacheco2943 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Steve-v8t3t
      As somebosy said once: "don t look the teeth of a given horse" me, being from the third world i even didnt notice the AI voice and i don t care, and I am grateful for so good video.

  • @chrisfernandez8453
    @chrisfernandez8453 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks!

  • @MacarthurLouissaint-rz7tl
    @MacarthurLouissaint-rz7tl หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hey buddy you might want to do a video about dr chris mcginty founder of the mcginty equation he talks about Ai holographic quantum computing and zero point energy and wormholes and Healthcare.

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    that's because light has to travel through air - oxygen that changes it forms to wave like in water because the air is a thin field of HO2=water a thin layer of water..or humidity=water...

    • @susanwerb7962
      @susanwerb7962 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Light doesn't travel, it's reflected

  • @PeterParker-gt3xl
    @PeterParker-gt3xl 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Recommend listen to Prof. Sean Caroll lectures on QM. if one has no attention deficit.

  • @rubenpalma4045
    @rubenpalma4045 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks. Great explanation.

  • @JohnJohnny-z2y
    @JohnJohnny-z2y 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    If i could travel about amillion times faster than lighti id be prity fast but very slow depending onhow far my understanding was in front or behind me prof john bye

  • @nameless-yd6ko
    @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "If a tree falls in the forest, and there are none to hear (goes the old Zen koan), does it make a sound?" I say NOT! It makes a SILENT shockwave. The silence of the shockwave can be demonstrated in a similar experiment to the one we performed with light. These silent shockwaves must act upon, stimulate, the eardrum, or similar membrane, and be translated in the old reliable brain as sound. The world around your ears is quieter than the emptiest reaches of deep space. Absolute silence. The place where all sound exists, (thank you Beethoven!), is, again, in the head. As the perceiver and translator of signals from the ear drum, the brain creates a concept of sound and attributes appropriate meaning to it, then stores the data. Outside your head... silence. Darkness.
    Likewise for all of those Original Senses. There are no deliciously aromatic clouds of fragrances hovering over a summer garden. There are bits of "random programming" (the stuff from which atoms are "made/discerned") that stimulates our olfactory sense. After filtering the information through our whole life history, making various modifications, lots of computing (albeit in a very short amount of time), correlating memories like a "line-up" at the Brain-land Police Station. We then "perceive" an odor, a perfume in the air all around. Ah, lilacs! Sorry, all in the mind. Without, there is "potential", within, a deliciously fragrant garden.

  • @JohnJohnny-z2y
    @JohnJohnny-z2y 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It could happen but it dont but it will prof john

  • @jasonhollister7497
    @jasonhollister7497 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    ........................."Beatifull PRODUED"OLD SCHOOL" "GOLDEN" "AGE' of Quentum Physics & "History" & "CODE"!!

  • @changethisonceamonth7516
    @changethisonceamonth7516 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I enjoy these videos as they are at a higher level. Not too deep but interesting.
    I cannot watch a practical physics video explaining, for example, F=MA . It triggers a feeling of being back in school and that I have to engage my brain.

  • @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment
    @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    (EDIT answer at end)Question? If I could build a long pole stretching from earth to the sun for example (you must obviously suspend some belief for this thought experiment) and place a few in a rack each one representing a letter with one person on one side on earth and another on the other end on the sun couldn't I break the rule of the speed of light/information by passing messages by just pressing on a pole moving it on the other end almost instantly therefore passing a almost instant message while a message at lightspeed would take 8 minutes to travel the same distance. Wouldn't I be breaking a law of physics?
    EDIT: THIS IS THE ANSWER IN THE SIMPLEST TERMS I CAN THINK OF.....The force applied to a object travels through the object at the speed of sound when the force applied is at or below ~343 m/s^2! If the force applied is faster than the speed of sound (~343 m/s^2) then it travels through the object you're applying the force to at the speed of the force applied. So apparently the other end of the pole wouldn't move until the speed of sound made it's way from the point of applied pressure to the end or the fastest you could possibly move it ,C or the speed of light, would travel through the object at lightspeed. So the fastest the other end would move would be the same as light. It's seems counter to logic to me but that's the answer.

    • @IvanLeeRossperry
      @IvanLeeRossperry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good question, that's a bit more of a loophole, you can think of it this way, the pole does not move at the speed of light, instead the entire length of the pole is a singular object, only moving back and forth an inch or so. If you start running at one end of a train while the train moves one inch forward, the train does not move faster than you, because it moved as a whole that covers a much larger distance that outdoes however much faster you are moving. But, on the other hand, you would by technicality be transferring information over distance faster than the speed of light over distance

    • @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment
      @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @IvanLeeRossperry yeah it's not the speed of light I'm referring to technically it's the speed of information. From my understanding information is limited by the speed of light and information itself cannot travel faster than C. Unless I'm wrong about that.

    • @IvanLeeRossperry
      @IvanLeeRossperry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, you're right, but it's the experiment that wouldn't work, the information is as long as the pole, as if you move one end, there is zero delay, the only delay would be in the information from the end of the pole to the person at it,.
      For it to be fair, you would need a beam of light just as long as the pole to properly race the information, in which the light would win.

    • @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment
      @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @IvanLeeRossperry yeah that's what I was thinking since it's one continuous piece of matter so the information transfer doesn't apply. I've been thinking of work arounds tho. They get pretty complicated tho so I'm not going to lay them out here but yeah it's different.

    • @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment
      @Kuwaitisnot_adeployment 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@IvanLeeRossperry hey I came back to tell you something pretty weird I discovered. I still can't fully accept this but apparently the force applied to a object travels through the object at the speed of sound when the force applied is below ~343 m/s^2! So apparently the other end of the pole wouldn't move until the speed of sound made it's way from the point of applied pressure to the end. It's seems counter to logic to me but apparently that's the answer. I'm going to go research it some more to try and grasp the concept fully but figured I'd come tell you since you took the time to reply to me. Happy thanksgiving if you're an American unless you're a Indian then my condolences.✌🏻✌🏽✌🏿

  • @dukeon
    @dukeon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Why do people put up with robotic AI narration that mangles many names and drones on monotonously? Don’t be complicit in your own demise - say NO to AI 🤖.

  • @Williamb612
    @Williamb612 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The irony is whether we have quantum physics correct or not makes no difference. The truth of what it is and how it works is limited by our brain's capability of understanding. the Quantum world is , no matter whether we understand it or not

  • @tomanson1098
    @tomanson1098 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    Drop the AI voice and read it yourself. Was interested until I realized it was AI a few minutes in. Now, not interested. Do your own work.

    • @dukeon
      @dukeon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Definitely!!

    • @todever
      @todever 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      AI sucks. Just let someone read it

    • @henrikeriksson7316
      @henrikeriksson7316 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Agree

    • @yoshimitsu8643
      @yoshimitsu8643 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Your stance reflects a cognitive bias a preconceived judgment about AI that assumes its output is inherently flawed. This overlooks the possibility that significant effort was made, with AI merely used for refinement. Ironically, you may have unknowingly relied on AI in other contexts without question, highlighting selective skepticism. The issue lies not in AI itself but in the rigidity of this perspective

    • @todever
      @todever 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @yoshimitsu8643 No, my stance is that AI voice is annoying to listen to. But if you enjoy it then more power to you

  • @David_Lloyd-Jones
    @David_Lloyd-Jones หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    DeBroglie is pronounced "de broy."

    • @nameless-yd6ko
      @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We hear the 'g' when Google pronounces it.

  • @stevenherbert4779
    @stevenherbert4779 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm confused - Somehow I'm watching "The Entire History of Quantum Physics Explained in One Video" posted 10d ago on TH-cam by Big Scientific Questions on the Big Screen but can't find it on their page with my phone 🤔

  • @dondattaford5593
    @dondattaford5593 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We don't know all of the various ways the quantum world reveals itself

  • @yoshimitsu8643
    @yoshimitsu8643 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In the beginning there was nothing
    Then there was a point
    But you couldn’t pinpoint the point bcz of quantum physics

  • @wmstuckey
    @wmstuckey หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is the Stern-Gerlach experiment? You could have introduced spin in 1922, well before the Dirac equation and Pauli exclusion principle.

  • @niravparmar7856
    @niravparmar7856 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine watching these animations after smoking weed

    • @doncahooti
      @doncahooti หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm gonna hafta imagine seeing them without having done so . .
      .. but wait a stoned minute ; "Einstein discovered light was a particle " ? ?

  • @johanperez1689
    @johanperez1689 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    47:34 indicating how masterfully things do not just happen, and what's beautiful is how the closer you look at how the quantum mechanics field explains the true fabric of reality. Intelligent design would be absurd to deny. The probability of everything having to be perfectly held together and subscribing to proven erroneous ideology like darwinism Is truly having faith. I'll tell you what open up a new deck of cards and shuffle them well. Then throw that deck of cards into the air. The probability of that deck of cards landing in perfect order is what you would call absurd. Just as likely it is absurd to believe everything that exist just randomly came together in perfect order. I mean we're talking about constantly hitting the lottery for 90 days straight without failing. From a supposed big bang happening to start the show.

  • @jerrycates3539
    @jerrycates3539 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Terrible music at times makes it hard to understand narrator’s words. A big distraction. Please ditch the music.

  • @raphaelflores9496
    @raphaelflores9496 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the Quantum Mechanics of Soul?

    • @davedsilva
      @davedsilva 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Spiritual Mechanics. I'm writing a paper on it.

    • @nameless-yd6ko
      @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      There is none!
      A Soul is Consciousness!
      This is Reality as I see it;
      1) All that exists is One Consciousness/Mind ('God' if you like...).
      Beyond this not anything else exists.
      2) We are all unique momentary Perspectives (Souls) comprising the One Consciousness.
      3) That which we, collectively, 'perceive/reflect' (are Conscious of) is Mind/Memory/concepts (the little bit before us at the moment).
      "God cannot know himself but by me!" - Meister Eckhart

  • @joepaparapper
    @joepaparapper หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    bro im watching ts at 6am i dont fucking know 🙏

  • @Chandu0439
    @Chandu0439 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brain faded😮

  • @user-ys9to2ie7k
    @user-ys9to2ie7k 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The only way this video could service any practicality is by turning down the volume and listening to Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon. Listening to the lyrics would give you far more insight to the world around us ¿`_

  • @MrJamshedakhtar
    @MrJamshedakhtar 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    cordless electricity

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the atoms exist, because energy light was there before time began to exist...light might have created time but time didn't create light or did it???

    • @nameless-yd6ko
      @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nothing exists without the illusion of time. It takes time to exist!
      And 'time' is an illusion! ;)

  • @DavidMoyer-mg3uq
    @DavidMoyer-mg3uq หลายเดือนก่อน

    :-: Atom Army :-:

  • @johndunn5272
    @johndunn5272 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Exciting presentation

  • @furpiginfidel7681
    @furpiginfidel7681 11 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Go home universe, you're drunk 😂

  • @theWinterWalker
    @theWinterWalker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I hate to say it, i love your content but I can't with the AI voice, your first videos were everything. Now it just feels fake.
    Sad to go bc you have a gift.

  • @akashicrecords9
    @akashicrecords9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think we need to more investgation

  • @bertbosman1955
    @bertbosman1955 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please silence the someetimes loud, superfluous and superdistracting music and I'll try to watch this fantastic video again.

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    🎉

  • @Kyle-bg7ji
    @Kyle-bg7ji 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Correction, God created all mathmatical equasions, men just discover them.

  • @stevenherbert4779
    @stevenherbert4779 หลายเดือนก่อน

    About 45 minutes into it they start playing Music behind the Narrator? Could not understand him and cut off the Sound.

  • @Tensorclock-z6k
    @Tensorclock-z6k 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bots sure know all about the universe

  • @prodipbiswas682
    @prodipbiswas682 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Good imagination

  • @AndréIsakWøien
    @AndréIsakWøien 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Draax = Diracs.

  • @Steve-v8t3t
    @Steve-v8t3t หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The music however is annoying

  • @challahsmith3257
    @challahsmith3257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nuclear energy

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank - you . ( 2024 / Dec / 15 )

  • @Contentious
    @Contentious 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

  • @ClaudeEnckels
    @ClaudeEnckels 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @eduardoribeiro383
    @eduardoribeiro383 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice video but the AI narration is unbearable.

  • @MisbahulMunir-p1o
    @MisbahulMunir-p1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jika kalian merubah sistem /konsep?,, yg ada komplek teros meneros, seperti manusia purba ⚡🌟🇲🇨☢️🇷🇺💥💯💯💯

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    red is unification easier to detect because it is in clusters ...

  • @LouiseRidgeway
    @LouiseRidgeway หลายเดือนก่อน

    None of this has any affect on my life, so why do i watch it.Because its interesting.Cant help but wonder what aliens call these things.we call the atoms .Guess thay would have another name for them. Thats interesting to me

    • @AdLuX222
      @AdLuX222 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This IS life.

  • @daevkeli1013
    @daevkeli1013 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Schroedinger’s Cat is treated to a little too much visual licence.

  • @damianalex4994
    @damianalex4994 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Terrible video, there's no history. It's just a list of events...
    Someone else in the comments said that it is read by AI and that you should read it by yourself. Sadly it has been generated by AI as well and it's quite obvious how you did it, thanks to the intdoduction: you asked for the core points in the developement of quantum mechanics and then asked about those one by one. You clearly have no idea about anything regarding the field.
    You put zero effort in this creation and it shows, I just write my comment in hope you read it and understand that science communication requires to study. Knowing nothing about a topic shows, in a quite sad way.
    Remember, science is much more interesting than a stupid list, something that an AI could never understand.

  • @jkonrad
    @jkonrad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Think this is AI generated and narrated but it’s pretty good nonetheless.

  • @helendunn9905
    @helendunn9905 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Completely misinterpreted and misrepresented the Schrodinger's Cat history and concept. Please fix and stop repeating the error. 😢❤

  • @ก.ไก่สระอี
    @ก.ไก่สระอี 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    กี่ดูแบบนี้

  • @dissaid
    @dissaid หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👍

  • @gregbrown9792
    @gregbrown9792 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How can you tell that it's a ai voice? I can't.

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    see blue like the sky is created by distance not by clusters of photons

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the universe does not require an observer to exist, because it was there ' long before any absorber existed that we know off...light was there before the first photon... that is energy that = matter...

    • @susanwerb7962
      @susanwerb7962 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's actually the proof of god...the universe observing itself

    • @anatoliykaraush8847
      @anatoliykaraush8847 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EXPLANATION: MATRIX, TIME, SPEED OF LIGHT, QUANTUM UNCERTAINTY, ELECTRIC POWER, RADIO WAVES, CURVATURE OF SPACE, DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY, GOD, SOUL
      Our world is an encoded information program
      A quantum computer is no longer science fiction, but a reality. The next step is to create a quantum printer.
      According to the theory of modeling, our world is a holographic three-dimensional matrix of pixels. The size of a pixel is equal to the minimum Planck length
      The Planck length is a unit of length in the Planck system of units, equal in the International System of Units (SI) to approximately 1.6⋅10-35 meters. The Planck length is a natural unit of length, since it contains only fundamental constants: the speed of light, the Planck constant, and the gravitational constant.
      The approximate radius of the observable Universe (14.3 billion parsecs or 4.4⋅1026 m) is 27⋅1060 Planck lengths.
      To within π, the Planck mass is equal to the mass of a black hole whose Schwarzschild radius is equal to its Compton wavelength. The radius of such a black hole would be of the same order of magnitude as the Planck length.
      The Planck length (and the Planck time associated with it) define the scale at which modern physical theories cease to work: the geometry of space-time predicted by general relativity ceases to make sense at the Planck length. These scales preserve a yet-to-be-discovered theory combining general relativity and quantum mechanics that can most fully describe the laws of physics. For this reason, modern descriptions of the development of the Universe begin only when the Universe was 1.616 • 10-35 meters in size.
      Time: t = Ch t- time (1 sec) C- speed of light h - Planck length
      The movement of light is the alternating switching (exposure) and switching off (fading) of pixels according to the amplitude of the sinusoidal wave of the spectral frequency period.
      In one second, the frequency of alternating switching of alternating pixels is 300,000 kilometers - according to a given qubit code program. The speed of light in a vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 m / s. The pixels of the matrix form atoms, molecules and the entire surrounding world. The entire subsequent program of actions and forms of living nature is embedded in DNA. Based on this constant, light formally moves uniformly, regardless of the direction of parallel movement and the speed of its movement, another object. If, by coding, modulation and detection, the pixel grid (matrix) changes with a certain step, much smaller or larger than the Planck length of about 1.6⋅10-35 meters, there will be movement into the future, the past, or going beyond the pixel matrix. Quantum dualism in the Young double-slit experiment is also explained by switching photons at a given frequency of the past and future. The photon does not move anywhere. The illusion of movement is formed by switching pixels that create a photon in the form of a spectrum of frequencies of different colors by the amplitude of the sinusoidal period and passes through both slots in the on and off state. The eye determines only the on positive frequency - the amplitude state of the photon. Passing light through a prism, we see its entire spectrum, so experiments show different values ​​​​of the photon particle or wave.
      In the same way, the movement of electric current, radio waves and magnetic fields occurs. Their nature is also to expose and darken the gradation of the pixel grid.
      Pixel formations in objects such as planets, stars, black holes have a curved structure in the form of spirals, on which balls and curvature of space-time arise. The galaxy is formed and controlled by a black hole by detecting and decoding information from software, memory or consciousness. Dark matter and - is a pixel-encoded software and objects of memory of the past and future, which are in a state of binary qubit code shutdown and cannot be detected by any device.
      Dark energy is the gravity of the White hole in which our universe is located
      God is a program that controls the universe based on the information world intelligence launched from the outside. Beyond the Planck length
      The soul of man is part of the information program of the world intelligence, which is stored in the program memory in the form of a binary code of Planck lengths in the qubit form of the future and the past
      Practical use. Using the technology of pixel-holographic software modeling, it is possible to artificially create any object using a quantum computer, a quantum 3D printer and a quantum holographic projector, up to the Universe. Instantaneous movement when copying, move objects and move in space using antilight, etc.
      The ultimate goal is a quantum printer. Then all sorts of problems will be solved and all religious miracles and extrasensory abilities will be understood

    • @LordWarden170
      @LordWarden170 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@susanwerb7962 the universe observing itself, kinda like self awareness that's an idea worth looking into...

    • @nameless-yd6ko
      @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nonsense!
      All that Exists is perceived, all that is perceived exists.
      Not anything exists that is not perceived!!
      Existence is, thus, all-inclusive.
      If Reality is predicated on Existence, then Reality is all inclusive!
      If Truth is predicated on Reality, then Truth is ALL INCLUSIVE!
      If you cannot see Truth somewhere, then the 'lack' lies within you!

  • @LordWarden170
    @LordWarden170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    blue represents chaos, entropy reason why it harder to get...

  • @DreamDoodleDo-b6l
    @DreamDoodleDo-b6l หลายเดือนก่อน

    th-cam.com/video/FxbryPd8MV8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=LbSUQ2UVLKROSBTm

  • @otiebars32
    @otiebars32 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I've heard of the uranium atoms, but what about the Mexican atom?

  • @jiro4559
    @jiro4559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Music... could be better

    • @edfrancis165
      @edfrancis165 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is not a music channel. What an utterly useless and ridiculous comment.

  • @josepholugbami794
    @josepholugbami794 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I am reading or hear the christian bible. Sound like

  • @jaybingham3711
    @jaybingham3711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aside from the ridiculous butchering of "observation" as it pertains to things quantum...going (inappropriately) as far as to suggest it is tied to consciousness (a word that is unarguably bereft of specificity)...the manner in which this presentation zeroes in on the critical/key historic moments and provides the relevant details succinctly--is just outstanding.
    FYI: As it pertains to consciousness...do yourself a favor and go read the Psychology Today article "10 Problems With Consciousness" by Gregg Henriques, PhD.

    • @nameless-yd6ko
      @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So, Consciousness is not the Ground of all perception, including observation? Really? lol
      There is no "Problem with Consciousness", there is a problem with some people's understanding and... quite limited Consciousness!

    • @jaybingham3711
      @jaybingham3711 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @nameless-yd6ko There's a problem with people's lack of hubris. So lacking are these people that they go around asserting that they actually possess an elevated/superior state of something that they can't even define. Not a good look.

    • @nameless-yd6ko
      @nameless-yd6ko 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@jaybingham3711 So, you have nothing rational to say to refute anything I said, but your panties got all awad, and babbling insult is all you have? Ad-hominem? (look it up) Sad.
      Republikan? MAGA?
      Muted! ;)

  • @ganeshrampandiaraj
    @ganeshrampandiaraj หลายเดือนก่อน

    BGM is irritating and suppressing the voice explanation

  • @elhamrazazi
    @elhamrazazi หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please read Seyed Kazem Mousavi's articles on six-dimensional space-time. He has solved all the problems of physics.General Balance in the Six-Dimensions of Space-Time

  • @Percyripped
    @Percyripped หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hate a.i

  • @MisbahulMunir-p1o
    @MisbahulMunir-p1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Berarti yg mereka ramalkan melalui angka2 jelas ta' nyambong??,, padahal, TUHAN menciptakan semesta SE isinya, sudah ditanggong segala galanya!!,, artinya sudah dari zaman dulunya dulu zaman ini zaman keemasan,, namon,kalian ta'brusaha mengubah sistem,, justru yg di ikuti paradok lama di zaman jahiliah/ zaman kebodohan 🎉🎉🎉😮😮😮⚡👁️👁️💎🌍🌏🌎🌐☔☔☔💯💯💯💯💯

  • @mikel4879
    @mikel4879 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BS

  • @kevgjkd1970
    @kevgjkd1970 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I echo the above comment.
    Great Scienc😊😊e😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊m😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

  • @Gesus_23
    @Gesus_23 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Crap

  • @MisbahulMunir-p1o
    @MisbahulMunir-p1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jika kalian merubah sistem /konsep?,, yg ada komplek teros meneros, seperti manusia purba ⚡🌟🇲🇨☢️🇷🇺💥💯💯💯