Why Singapore's Cycling Laws Don't Make Any Sense | Singapore Explained
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2023
- Corrections: 1:07 UPDATE: The Land Transport Authority (LTA), addressing the first scenario in this video (making a right turn in a straight/right turn lane), referred us to the theory test handbook for Power-Assisted Bicycle (PAB) users, which states that Option B is the recommended option.
LTA also shared a guide for cyclists and motorists, titled “Navigating Traffic Scenarios Safely” (go.gov.sg/onroadhandbook). It recommends Option D as an alternative to Option B.
Have an interesting video idea? Send us an email at video@mothership.sg
LET'S CONNECT!
-- Facebook: / mothershipsg
-- Twitter: / mothershipsg
-- Instagram: / mothershipsg
-- Tiktok: / mothershipsg
-- Telegram: t.me/mothershipsg
🔔 Click on the bell icon to be the first to watch our videos! 🔔
Lets admit it, cycling is never in the plan of Singapore traffic
On the east side no. On the west side yes. The west severely lacks cycling park connectors when compared to the east. It's ridiculoius. For as long as the govt continues to build more cycling paths in the east and neglect the west, road cycling is not going to subside.
Agree living in the west is awful for cycling. I don’t even dare to ride on the roads.
Our roads aren’t designed with cyclists in mind. LTA should seriously study Amsterdam’s model if we seriously wanna go car-lite, bicycle heavy.
Totally agree. However, if we really want to study and implement Amsterdam's model, that would mean that Singapore's government would need to spend more money for dedicated cycling lanes on the road. Yes, it is possible for the government to spend that money but this project is going to take time.
Amsterdam cyclist and driver are very considerate to each other. Cyclist giving hand signal with the intention to turn while the driver there driving patiently behind and ensuring enough space for cyclist. They also have the habit of slowing down ensuring the safety of all pedestrian upon reaching a junction. Their heavy vehicle appear early morning when everyone is sleeping and shop are closed. Their buses does not pile up in a single file unlike Singapore.
Singapore road is tough, u may cross paths with a number of buses if u cycle on the extreme left depending on the road . It can be deadly cos the cyclist view is completely blocked, that cyclist require a lot of effort to keep a safe distance from the bus if he decided to switch lane. Which taking into consideration the oncoming vehicle from the next lane can see you. There is no way to cycle safely on a busy road unless u can go fast, take the PCN or the cycling path.
We had widen the pedestrian lane to pedestrian cum cyclist lane in Bt Panjang. It is a total waste of tax payer money. No cyclist use it at all. Imagine the number of accident and complaints reported to Bt Panjang TC that they had to widen the pedestrian lane. Yet, cyclist still prefer to ride on the non widen lanes ( eg, to and from Fajar) or on the roads( eg to and from Bangkit)
That is why I don't agree that our roads are not cyclist friendly. Singapore government just refuse to amend and adjust the law, with the very first priority of licensing
bicycle. By doing that, you can then pinpoint when accident happen be it to pedestrian or car driver or the cyclist himself. If cyclist will to use the road, pay road tax.
Please don't say that it is expensive then to cycle in Singapore.
Remember that before Holland Amsterdam decided that bicycle was a mode of transportation, it is a hobby and an expensive one.
Our weather is not suitable to cycle for commute. So it’s not even a debate. It will be building infrastructure for a very limited users that will never grow in size.
London used to be non-cyclist friendly, but unlike Singapore they did attempt to reverse that by introducing Cycleways alongside existing roads
We need to get those who implement any rules to test it out themselves first. A lot of rules are weird in Singapore.
Arm chair legislators, what to do
you are right. and also ask the ministers who implement rules like 'after eat must return tray and clean table to avoid a fine' to clear their own plate and tray in high class restorans and 5star hotels bcoz that are where they and their family and friends eat
When laws are higher than common sense.
They are meant as loopholes to protect the elite just in case their darling children are involved.
yes, ministers and MPs with no common sense
When I drive, I be considerate to cyclists. When I cycle, I be considerate to drivers. That’s all I can do as a road user.
That's the problem. You drive and cycle so you understand both point of view .... I ride motorbike, cycling, use public transport and drive only in the weekend depending on what is the most efficient .. Most of this cyclists don't or they just cycling for hobby that's why they developed this elitism. They think all driver drive to hunt down and kill cyclists, and they will save the planet by cycling.....
We want dedicated bikeline, we want no helmet law, we want free parking in apartments, we want free valet parking, we want free bike lock rental from business. And soon on....
If only there are more people like you. Many Singapore drivers are already so impatient and mean to each other on the roads, it's harder to expect them to be considerate to cyclists. Some cyclists also problematic, spent more than 10 to 20k on their road bikes and think they owned the road already.
@@neggsilver it is not that ever times the drivers is in a rush. They just somehow lost focus momentarily or misjudged the situations. Many a times cyclist doesn’t installed light at the back. I had in the past almost hit some cyclists luckily at the very last second I saw them otherwise I would have cause them serious injury, or even dead. It’s all up to you to decide and you can have mountain of reasons backing up the reason why you feel it is alright to ride on the road.
This kind of reporting is useful to our daily life. Thank you Mothership.
When I cycle on the road, I would normally keep to the extreme left of the road, such that the road wheels almost touch the kerbs, trying to be considerate to other road users. When I drive on the road, I would normally try to keep 1.5m distance apart when overtaking the cyclist as I understand cyclists might feel intimidated with cars driving too close for comfort. Let's all be patient and tolerant towards one another as a road user. Having said that, when overtaking, please turn on your signal indicator as I noticed far too often some drivers just don't have the habit of turning on signal indicators when changing lane or turning. Signal for others so that drivers or cyclists know where you are going and your intention. That's how accidents happen, when drivers don't signal or drive too fast (can't stop in time) and cause accidents.
Do not cycle so close to the edge or you’ll have nowhere to move to if you need to
When I was young, I cycled about 10 km to school. I never occupied the center of roads and always kept as far left as possible because I did not want to inconvenient car users with my slow speed. If I needed to turn right I would disembark, wait and push my bicycle across pedestrian traffic junctions. No issues. It is a matter of consideration for other road users. Most importantly, everyone can reach home safely.
LKY makes sense
LHL makes
You are good person whom are thoughtful and kind hearted , I wish you safe and healthy. ❤
Ya but then like the problem in the video have mentioned what happens when there is no pesdestrian traffic junctions...I mean I was thinking maybe if they kept left on the right most turning lane and continue keeping left when turning.
@e_s.g.s.p1251 and also those drivers who complain that cyclist choose to go pedestrain whenever we feel like 😭
plus bicycles then had mirrors & registration plates.
I love it that Mothership got Nigel to narrate. I love his articulation! well spoken, well put and easy to understand!
Do you know his IG/Tiktok acc?
This is an excellent video which captures two (of many) possible pain points about cyclists on roads. Thank you for the legal references too. And in the end, yes, we all just need to be more considerate. Kudos!
Yes in singapore its really not worth cycling....until the day i see dedicated cycling lanes adjacent to the road. Will i consider switching. I cycle on the pavement kanna scolded, riding on road also kanna scolded..... from a ex cycle commuter in holland, australia. Now a motorist in sg.
You cycle in Australia and drive in Singapore? What an odd choice...
@@anubizz3 If I had to choose between Australia and Singapore, or anywhere in SEA for that matter, I'd still pick Australia. Sydney isn't perfect, the roads aren't designed for cyclist safety in mind, but in most places at least pedestrians aren't fighting with cyclists for space and drivers in Australia are actually more courteous than Singaporeans Citizens and PRs who are more often than not, more than happy to kill you for shits and giggles if they don't get caught.
@@ReizePrimus Too much traffic fines in Australia. In school zones and school timing, it's strictly 40km/hr else fines + demerit points. Double demerits and double fines (800 ish) for public holidays and long weekends. In Singapore, I seldom see any TP nor any drivers respecting the stop sign or speed limit. Enforcement is the problem in SG. Almost non existent.
Considering how small and how quite flat Singapore is... it is like the perfect place to have decent bike infrastructure. Just mimic the Netherlands and it would work wonders. It requires little effort even imo.
Quite the disappointment I had in Singapore, considering how expensive cars are yet large roads everywhere...
Once I was keeping left while cycling only to realise that my lane leads to an express way. I was caught in a situation where I could not make a sudden lane shift to keep to the road and realised I had to make a sudden stop at the left road shoulder and find another way out of that mess.... oh yes and the right turn scenarios are still scary sometimes....
In my previous job, I cycled to work everyday for 8km. Always on the pedestrian walk because one puncture tyre on the road, I could end up in hospital.
I had mine punctured before I changed to schwalbe. When it is punctured it lowers your max speed, doesn't mean totally cannot cycle.
Agreed. Well said. Stay safe and always keep safe.
I wonder why puncture tyre = hospital?
i am a grabfood rider.. you are correct with all the scenarios.. when its safe.. i will "siam/stop to one side, let buses passed".. because they must also try to keep left and its not always safe for them to overtake my poor little bike..
most drivers are nice, they try their best to give way to cyclist.. thanks very much.. but of cos we do have those "yaya papaya" type who purposely drift to the left forcing me to stop..
well.. big junctions i will cross by the pedestrian lane.. if no traffic light lane.. i will go straight to the next one and make sorta a U Turn..
when driving, if no U Turn, go straight to the next one.. i am a driver too..
I feel there's no roads the cycles and pedestrian in Singapore and Malaysia due ti old school British road design. However, these people should have the same rights to use public roads as automobiles
"On the other hand, cyclists say that drivers need to be more careful and considerate and stop being so entitled!" - To be fair, drivers actually pay for a Certificate of ENTITLEMENT HAHA
Oh shit. No wonder lor. They paid to be entitled.😅
they also pay road tax
Lol
Ba dum tsssss
Well wait until you watch the shifters, this cyclists demand
-no helmet law
-minimum free secure bike rack in every apartment
-free lock rental from business
-free bike valet parking in shopping centre
-dedicated bikeline with priority over pedestrian and public transport.
Now I wonder who is the one that entitled.
ive been cycling on singapore roads since 2015. ive only been in 2 car accidents: 1 taxi driver beating the red light and 1 early 20s year old driver going fast not looking while merging into a main road. none of these accidents were major. cycling in singapore is relatively safe and part of being a responsible cyclist is getting to know the roads and safest routes on your commute and/or workout. if you are lost and its the first time in an area, always take the SAFEST option no matter how inconvenient you may think it is at the moment. be respectful on the road and the only person you can trust to keep you safe out there is yourself.
Yes, i agree that the road is relatively safe when everyone simply follows the rule. Yet, when one driver violates it, cyclists are the most vulnerable among all. It doesn't matter how good we are as cyclists following the rules, it takes just one single crazy driver on the road to harm or get us killed for nothing. It's that simple. Therefore, for me and for my best safety, by all means stay away from the road. I think that's the best advice I could give to other cyclists for our best safety.
Only 2 accidents? Even just one accident can cause serious injury or even death.
@@hbtan9841 exactly.
@@hbtan9841 yup you are totally correct. my worst accident? i was out running and there was a group of people crowding a sidewalk. i ran on the grass to go around them and fell in a ditch. i went to the hospital for that. funny enough that a sport which seems as safe as running got me into my worst accident. running, cycling, basketball, football unfortunately all sports have their risks.
3rd accident you wouldn't be posting here.
Singapore needs dedicated cycling lanes on the road.
I recall once during the peak hour when a cyclist was riding on the road, while all the buses behind him did not overtake him for safety reasons. The speed dropped to about 10km/h. This went on for at least 20 minutes. Imagine dozens of bus passengers getting late for work, because of that one cyclist who was hogging up the entire road.
Missed opportunity to talk about infrastructure improvement, which provides a lot more positive externalities than the obvious. When every driver is also a cyclist (because the infrastructure encourages it), they would naturally drive more safely when sharing the road with their peers.
And unsurprisingly, there are already entitled individuals saying cyclist shouldn't be on the road cuz they don't pay road tax. *roll eyes*
It’s not just road tax, you have no insurance in the event you cause an accident etc…also why should we use public funds for your hobby? What so great about it anyways? And can such major changes be justified as a public good where only such a small minority partakes in it ?
@@ryantan1022 that's why In Netherlands, they have bike roads and bike expressways all over the country. Cyclists should not be sharing the same road as both are traveling at different speeds. The weight are also a huge difference
Actually, a country that have a complete bike infrastructure could help improve local small businesses too. Bicycles take up a lot lesser space, thus increasing foot traffic to each individual businesses too. With a complete bike infrastructure also encourages more people to walk around as most bike infrastructures are also quite safe to walk too. This in turn increases overall foot traffic too thus increasing sales for local businesses too. Plus it's so much quieter to cycle as compared driving, making the whole neighborhood and city more peaceful and quiet
Better that cyclists don't need to pay road tax to cycle on the road. Imagine the counter argument, I pay road tax so I own the road. The motorists who kpkb will be owned!
@@DarkPa1adin damn, someone actually realised the flaw of the “cyclists don’t pay road tax” argument lol
I told my children, always refer to Law of Mother Nature BEFORE even thinking of Law of Singapore...
When there is no proper biking infrastructure, that's the issue and the government is to blame.
Exactly. I'm also wondering when Singapore will be cycling friendly. Some pedestrians even don't know that they have to keep left at all times.
Is there a reason why our law makers aren't following countries who implemented the cycling path (eg: Denmark). In Denmark, cyclists have to cycle on the cycling path if it is available to them. If the cycling path is not available, cyclists can use the road and need to keep to the extreme right (due to Denmark road direction). Cyclists must use the pedestrian crossing to cross the road. Cannot make a turn like a normal motorist. There is a fine for turning like a normal motorist. There are hand signals to indicate cyclists intention from turning right or left, slowing down, and stopping. I believe this could make the road safer for everyone.
Denmark has dedicated cycling paths along side roads. Singapore have bike lanes that are just pavements shared between pedestrians and cyclist. I don't think there is political will to implement European style bike policies (or policies that stop prioritizing vehicles over pedestrians for that matter), despite all the talk about going car lite.
In Denmark (very much unlike SG) infrastructure is designed and built around the convenience of cyclists. I'd be over the moon if SG could even hold a candle to DK, but it doesn't.
Not all places in Denmark have cyclist lanes. Therefore, cyclists are allowed to share the motorist road. Dont get me wrong, I am fine with cyclists on the road. My concern is the safety of the cyclists when they want to turn right. Why dont they use the pedestrian crossing to cross the road?
@@NetElyod That's a common lie used by drivers to justify bigoted beliefs. "I'm just so concerned about cyclist safety".
Why don't they use pedestrian crossings? Well why should they chose a slower route? Why don't you get out of your car and push it round corners? Why do you exceed 30kmh? We can't build society around ensuring drivers are minimally inconvenienced and everyone else should bow to them.
@@lukeh3020 like the lie cyclists often say they care about pedestrians and public transport?
I’ve never found turning right difficult but that said I have many years experience in traffic and can understand inexperienced riders could be potentially intimidated by cars. Basically signal with your hand in advance of the turn and when safe to do so filter to the right. Keep more to the left of the right turning lane and if time to do so filter through and position yourself in front but to the left of the car wishing to turn right. From this position all the cars wanting to turn right can see you (very important) and you are in the right turning lane far enough such that vehicles driving straight are not going to hit you. When the light goes green to turn right just take a wider turn than the car behind and that leaves room for them to pass easily and it also gets you nearer the left side of the road you are entering. I drive a car, motorcycle and bicycle and I dont see any issue in sharing the road safely
Many cyclists, and car drivers, behave very poorly in traffic, and/or don't stick to the traffic rules. As a cyclist you need to take 100% responsibility and follow the rules completely, and actively use all the signals etc. I do this, and I've never had 1 problem with a car while cycling in Singapore in many years. Part of the reason might be that I've been cycling for my whole life, and am very comfortable in traffic and following traffic flows, rules, and seeing the dangers.
LTA and ministry of transportation especially the minister stop paying attention on MRT and open your eyes and see this video.. wake up your bloody mind and that goes to the lazy useless TP too !
Car lite initiative is a half-baked effort.
Turn out minister is corrupt and doesn't care.
The best video I have seen on mothership. Well done.
i think everyone needs to be considerate to each other, just be thoughtful. like for example the exit of a flyover, usually when i exit a flyover on my bike, many considerate drivers will slow down and let me go into the left lane. i hope cars will give the 1.5m clearance coz for the cyclists, any small error or potholes, and we fall sideways and our heads can be under ur wheels if youre too close
honestly for the most part as a cyclist i can say 75% of SG drivers are good, 20% are just unaware of what to do and the 5% are cnuts :P
To be fair, drivng on the road requires a driving licence and TP test, i guess we can all agree that driving on the road goes beyond being proficient with the equipment at hand. Not to mention following basic traffic rules, as simple as traffic lights, signalling and PPE. Not sure how many Cyclist/ ebikes actually goes through the traffic rules before going onto the roads.
Just to add, i dont think a cyclist PPE is comparable to a motor cyclist PPE and insurance😅 On the other hand, many pedestrians road is not wide enough for pedestrians and cyclists to share the pathway, plus nowadays PMDs are growing in sizes.😂
The keyword is "practicable". Meaning if want to turn right, of course, it's not practical to be on the left or middle lane. In that case, it is fine to be on the right. Still abiding by law.
All these happen because Singapore has become a car centric nation, where traffic rules are more beneficial to drivers than padestsrians and cyclist. In Netherlands, they do have bike roads amd bile expressway, where the cyclist do have a road of their own. Bicycles and cars shpuld not ne sharing the same road as both ate 2 different apeeds and weight
I like the idea of Banning cars in Singapore, we would need to increase buses even though the trains are good albeit a bit packed in peak hours (smaller trains off peak?), Would need a few more shelters on the road as the rain does become a problem, also would need to mandate public showers or could be beneficial to companies to fit showers at the work place and maybe an express laundry service that's a few bucks for those bike riders, would be radical and really green!
@@pauladams-sh not gonna happen,bro. Our government earn millions of dollars from COE every year. That's why our traffic rules mostly favour to drivers instead of padestsrians and cyclists. Parking fees as well. Our government doesn't make money from cyclists and e-scooter riders, that's why the cycling culture is not strong. Our bike infrastructure is also not complete
That's too simple minded. Bulk of the traffic now is commercial vehicles transporting your parcels, your workers building the BTO, delivering goods to the supermarket etc, and of course those dangerous PHVs and blurr sotong hourly rental cars.
@@nnnnn8173 if the government really desperately want to reduce vehicles, try removing all multi storey and underground carparks and repurpose these spaces for other community usage instead and only keep those limited open space carparks. Once these are replaced, all drivers will rethink whether they must and can't live without a private vehicle given the limited open space carparks. This just shows that our government is benefiting greatly from COE and parking fees. Another way to reduce vehicles is limiting the number of vehicles to be imported every month.
@@pauladams-sh yah make sure you pick up your goods at dock, and don't just click on delivery button because if you not aware mostlikely it deliver by a car.... Singapore have one of the best public transport already my wife family never own a car and don't have a reason to own one.
Singapore have 149 car per 1000 people while the utopian Netherlands have 588 car per 1000.....
The pedestrian lanes are so narrow that I fear for mountain bikes all the time when I'm on the lanes. I own 2 types of bikes myself and average speed around 35kmph. There's simply no good option for cyclists in SG. You risk hitting pedestrians on sidewalks, you risk being hit by negligent car drivers on the road. The city legislation is so torn between American car infested city and an Asian capital.
It’s like this in any western car centric country with urban setting. Car is king until more people demand protected cycling infrastructure separated from traffic or giving up road space for non-vehicular traffic.
It is really high time for the PAP government to relook some of the laws and manner of dispensing justice. With so many video evidence around, the authorities continue to drag all the parties involved and dispenses punishment especially fines without even making an effort to look closer into it. How many real Singaporeans have been so badly wronged by the lopsided justice system for the past 60 over years which rules always in favour of pinning criminality instead of addressing who the aggressor and initiator is. How can you blame someone who is simply fending off an attacker or troublemaker and when the police is not on immediate arrival?
Especially after the East Coast Road catfight, this is only the beginning.
Yes, be considerate and learn to share. That's the way.
the cycle of frustration and ambiguity will end when someone or some people violently DIE because of a stupid act of road rage. LTA & TP need to correct the ironies in their rule books ASAP!
I love how this is presented on a 3D map. Makes everything so clear! Where do you get this map anyway? :)
The law makers need to review and amend the traffic rules so that it makes sense. Make traffic rules easy to understand, you can't expect everyone to be well educated enough to understand the traffic laws written in the legal way. There are some Uncles and Aunties who don't have very high standard of English education and especially more so when you have to ask them to interpret what the traffic law is saying in lay man terms. If laws are so plain and simple,there wouldn’t be lawyers around to re-interpret the laws in relation to the case being heard in court, in other ways to argue their way against the legal system for their clients.
Just look to Melbourne, Australia, on how to make right hand turns from a multi-lane intersection on a bicycle. In Melbourne car drivers can make hook turns in the CBD, but cyclists can make hook turns at any intersection. Saves having to move out of the left lane.
Accidentally cycled onto a flyover and got honked, thought I broke the law and stopped at the side and waited for a relative to pick me up... would have kept going if I knew it was legal.
as a cyclist and driver i feel that the road in singapore is not practical for cyclist to be using at ALL TIMES
I usually do my deliveries around Clementi area,and occasionally i have to go to the NUS Campus area. The road i hate the most is the Clementi Rd that leads up to NUS. Because we have to keep to the left ya,but if i keep to the left,the lane exits to AYE towards east,and theres 2 lanes. Then when i stay in the correct lane at the middle,theres another AYE exit lane that goes west. Really hate that road so much. And all vehicles going thru there are going at 60-70kmh...
The solution will be to make more cycling paths such that cyclists can get anywhere only using designated paths, so they dont endanger motorists nor pedestrians
I love the diorama used
How about bicycle lighting? Do u think super bright and flashing lights are allowed? Some of them are actually not allow on cars but yet used on bicycles.
cycling rule? dont forget and also ask the ministers (malaysia born grace fool, amy kor) who implement rules like 'after eat must return tray and clean table to avoid a fine' to clear their own plate and tray in high class restorans and 5star hotels bcoz that are where they and their family and friends eat (100 singaporeans are booked so far since recent june 1st NEA catch hawker centres' eaters...)
The biggest problem is not pre planning for island-wide cycling lane from long ago, which causes annoyance and danger to all parties (pedestrians, cyclists, drivers).
To be fair cycling in Singapore is much safer now than when I first started doing it in the 90s. Back then bus drivers would routinely cut you up whereas now they seem almost too scared to pass you (seems they have been having some tough bus driver etiquette classes). Covid made the bike population explode and with that cars are by and large more aware and more careful so I noticed a significant improvement in safety getting around. That said if you choose to ride at night with no lights and no helmet (Grab anyone) then of course you are posing risk to yourself and others and should be more responsible
Because (1) bicycle is fundamentally different from autos. This dude is simulating scenarios with the unrealistic assumption that both vehicle types have similar speed and acceleration capabilities. Just take highways during peak hour as an example. All you need is one vehicle to slow down/stop to create a massive jam to the traffic behind. Imagine the amount of jam with cyclists riding in the middle of the main road at 5/10 km/h speed. Besides, bicycles are extremely slow and other vehicles have to slow down more than expected to provide more safety distance from them. Plus, cyclists are slow to react or drive out of dangers way. (2) Singapore roads are too narrow to accommodate cyclists. Imagine a cyclist maneuvering between two/one heavy vehicles on the road.
On the turn right scenario, my view is that B (middle of the middle lane) is the correct answer. Cars who want to go straight, go left, want to turn right, keep right or stay in the middle and accept that the cyclist is sharing the road with you and cultivate more patience for a slower and more vulnerable vehicle. Yes, bicycles are vehicles too. Peace.
Personally I use the hook turn, which minimises conflict points with drivers but increases conflict points with pedestrians on the Pedestrian path, but to me it is the safest way to turn right
However, I agree drivers can be jerks sometimes, and many laws are quite confusing
If I'm approaching a big junction and there are cars stopping me from changing lanes, I just take the pedestrian crossing. In the end, it's my life! But if there aren't many cars because its early morning, then whatever works... just use common sense and don't rely on car drivers to brake and save your own lives.
Singapore is nice and flat, very lucky to have many PCNs too. Cycle before you get too old and your bones get pain.
dont cycle on busy roads and be a menace
Please do a follow-up on cyclists on public paths. I had dozens of encounters with cyclists bullying pedestrians on public paths
The worst thing is cyclist nowadays don’t bother to ring the bell or they don’t even have a bell. How am I supposed to react in time if you’re 6 feet behind me?
@ have to see if pedestrian is walking on a bike-only PCN.
@@SM-gn8fq yeah I’ve seen those wide footpaths where half is for pedestrian and half is those red tracks for cycling. For some reason people seem to like walking on the cycling lane.
Especially PRCs and Cecas on rent bikes doing deliveries and speeding on footpaths. On the roads, AMK and their Pinkertons cause endless grief to all other road users.
@@SM-gn8fq A lot of neighbourhood footpaths are not bike-only PCN, including mine. The path is so small, the least you could do is ring or call out from a safe distance so I can give way in time. It doesn’t take a lot of effort to do so
well nigel, i did a triple viaduct 1 night, lornie, serangoon & west coast. i say again, it was in 1 (ONE) night! Bikes are allowed on the road, but when they "become" pedestrians & decide 2 ride on the sidewalk, then as absurd as it sounds, strictly speaking, they shd ride as slow as the slowest pedestrian walking.. no overtaking. i find that very rude. which is why i almost never ride on the sidewalk!
As long all road users have the mentality of 'road sharing' and safety first I feel it's a good way to start.
I drive and I ride. What I've noticed is that drivers and riders can be egoistic and expect the world to revolve around them.
It's very common in Singapore my friend. Poor peasants always have such problems
It is a Singaporean thing
We should have more reviews of road rules or might as well revise most of it.
Cyclists will always find the easiest way. Therefore use Strava Labs to analyse where they can add a dedicated cycle lane shortcut and cycle flyover.
Is there a traffic laws or Act stated a mandatory to keep 1.5m when overtaking cyclist?
I thought got alternative but he just complained like a Singaporean NGL even though I would too
Hello the customer is never wrong , in this case the Garmen . They just put a few auxiliary police , they say you wrong means you wrong okay , go pay the fine if you don't want to appear in court
I think interactions between road users highly dependent on the right of way. With cyclist expected to ride on the most left (double yellow lines) so vehicles can overtake them, do they have a right of way? Then is it alright for cyclist to cycle in the middle of the lanes? Where does that put them then? So are cyclist encourged to be on the roads?
when I was learning my driver’s license before covid, I did not study anything regarding how to deal with cyclists on the road. This in itself should already be a big loophole since cyclists are technically allowed on roads. Why are drivers not taught the bicyclist’ hand signals etc? How to expect us to co-exist when there is language barrier?
It is given that cyclist are to "stay on the far left as practicable as possible" of the lane relative to where the cyclist is going.
Thanks for the informative video.
The best choice is to make a cycling lane like other countries (specifically on the road)
The real issue here is why is there always a yellow Porsche following Cygel?
But you forgot about the king rule of them all - reckless riding/driving act
After this video, I agree the rules are too confusing. I suggest just 1 rule to clear this all up: BAN CYCLISTS FROM THE ROAD. Thanks for attending my Ted Talk.
Police reward of 50% of fines collected to informants will make for much better road users and better road safety for all. After all, those who submit incriminating videos of bad driving behaviour cases are actually helping society to use roads safer and doing much more than the average policeman to perform their job (some policemen are actually lazy/corrupt/ not qualified (police should also have bicycles as a patrol vehicle, for sting operations etc)). Police should reward the informants of dangerous driving to improve road safety for all. But small offences like parking summons don't need rewarding informants because these don't usually endanger lives and have ample foreigners (parking wardens) already hired to investigate these.
I remember once cycling up Upper Thompson Road I approached a motorist driving slowly in the middle lane because he felt it neccesary to drive alongside the cyclists in the left lane and shout at them for cycling 2 abreast on a 3 lane road at 5am. So I overtook the motorist in the right hand lane, because it was impracticable to use the left or middle lane when they're occupied by slower moving cyclists & mercedes. Despite my actions not obstructing the motorist in any way when he saw that he was being overtaken he went full umbrage, screaming, sounding his horn and rapidly accelerated to stop me from completing the overtakeing manouvre.
It is a shame that there are so many motorists who refuse to share the road and behave with such xenophobic hate towards light and sustainable vehicles being used on the roads.
This is what happens when the gov wants more bicycles and less cars on the road but its officials prefer driving cars themselves.
It's illegal to even ride on the footpath if you're in Australia
some scholar at LTA will create a matrix of rules and then tell the cyclists to take out the pamphlet to refer to while cycling in case unsure
There is no purpose of telling the problem.. what we need is a solution. Please provide solution and not the problem
I blame the design of the roads that are not designed for cycling but at the same time, pavement is not a great alternative either. Only park connectors really work well for cycling
even PCNs are clogged by pedestrians not keeping to their designated lanes....
Problem is some cyclist got no driving license and when they switch lane did not even bother to check blind spot
This is why cyclists and drivers should never share roads since cycling doesn't need a driving license.
Some drivers never check their blind spots, some (a lot) drivers queue across intersections, some drivers go much faster than the speed limit, some drivers pass too close to cyclists, some drivers (a lot) endanger pedestrians (who should always be number 1 priority) by turning into their crossings to save a few seconds, some drivers run red lights.
Some drivers and some cyclists, (and many delivery moped users) do stupid and dangerous things. So share and be considerate, and be extra considerate that as a driver you are in a large heavy metal box, you will not be hurt in an accident a cyclist surely will.
Also, most cyclists on Singapore roads can easily go 30kph+ , outside of the busiest highways that is hardly that much slower than cars, yet drivers pass us (often too close) all the time to save 20 seconds and usually get caught up at the next light or roundabout... maybe relax a bit and go with the flow.
Driving license doesn't make drivers responsible people. Many still ignore traffic light signals, drive under intoxication, speed, drive recklessly etc. What is necessary is more penalties and heavier punishments for errant drivers.
Maybe, police reward of 50% of fines collected to informer will make better toad users. After all, those who submit incriminating videos of bad driving behaviour are actually helping police immensely to perform their job. Police should reward the informants of dangerous driving to improve road safety for all. But small offences like parking summons don't need rewarding informants because these don't usually endanger lives and have ample foreigners (parking wardens) already hired to investigate these.
We definitely need more discourse on this. One of the better video on this topic. Good job!
My 2 cents. Most Singapore drivers pay so much to be on the road and our roads are crazy expensive. So of course the sense of entitlement like their Certificate of Entitlement will be sky high.
They can't ban cycling on roads.. So they confused it and creating tension between users
Can throw in PCN limitations as well
Nigel TOTALLY MISSED Coverage of HUGE Group of RECREATIONAL Cyclist where Most Drivers have A Peeve with
What about cyclist who do not stop at the red light?
Of course they gonna say driver and motorcycles do to.... But they never mention the statistics.
sounds much like Alabama's bicycle laws stay as far to the right as posable except when turning left
Good objective video. Lets just treat each other as human being on the road and be kind and patient to one another.
Cyclist who uses the road should pay roadtax like the rest of us. They should also have a demerit point system like us motorists, that way they wont act like the road is their father’s.
I sent a $50 check to LTA to pay for road tax for my bicycle. It was returned to me.
road tax is for carbon emissions
Cyclist pay their fair taxes the same as any motorist for the construction of road, road tax are just one of the taxes that the government collect and spent on including roads.
The reason why cyclist don't really need to pay extra to use that road are: motorist are paying for the privileged of using more space on the road in ratio of a human, motorist pollute; cyclist don't, cost more infrastructure to build parking spaces and law enforcement equipment to enforce the speed limit
I’m a car driver, motorcyclist and a cyclist so I already pay enough road tax thank you very much. Why not give me refund each time I use my bicycle instead of my car and blocking the street with another car since I’m “entitled” to drive my car?? I think you should also take up cycling it’s good for your health and might go some distance in sorting out your misunderstanding
@@888jucu That could be a good idea to encourage people to cycle more when they already own a vehicle. I agree with you on that, but paying road tax is burden that motorist must take themselves because ure paying a year subscription to use the road as a motorist. You dont complain when a ISP inform you that u have cancel and have not use your their service the whole month, and you should get a pro-rated refund based on that. Its most important for roadtax as well, its the industry standard. But to be honest, this is also quite predatory lah. Your idea is pretty good
On a 2 lane right turn with the left most lane allowing straight or right. The safest way is stay in the right most lane unless a car is stopped in the straight/right lane. At the point a car stops in that lane move over in front of that car. Maybe smile and show hand sign the driver your plans. And as soon as the turn starts stick your left arm out and start moving in a way that will put you on the left most side of the road from the point of entering it.
Otherwise stop and assess the junction to determine the best pedestrian crossing. There will ALWAYS be one nearby. Even if it requires doubling back. Don’t risk your life to safe a few minutes.
Why confusing people. Keeo to the road shoulder. Cross when vehicles stopped.
If they are more familiar with traffic rules would it be safer ?
I like the presentation using the mini toy
nice context from Nigel, from his experience, for me when i want to turn right i move to the right most lane, the problem would be getting there even if i signal as some roads with heavier traffic flow/peak hrs, increases dis difficulty...
Cyclist should start taking cycle exam and paid COE
LTA... What do you expect the outcome to be?
I've said in the past: expand the on-road cycling lanes @ tanah merah coast road to run alongside our roads/expressways? if infrastructure is well planned and developed, we could be the Holland of Asia w.r.t quality cycling infrastructure and in a way it's easier to do due to our small size!
infrastructure is already set in stone, it will take a long time to update it
A lane for cyclist along expressway? hahaha
Why should the public pay for such an expense ? Cyclist are a mere minority even smaller than people who own cars and bikes….why should we even be spending money for your hobby…now there’s groups that like fishing, maybe now we should have public funded boats to take ppl to the open seas ? And the list goes on…truly prove that cyclist are an entitled bunch
@@ryantan1022 Not a cyclist myself but opening up cycling lanes means more people will adopt cycling as a way of life and exercise. I don't cycle because I know its a pain when I have to deal with the traffic. Having more people commute using bicycle will reduce the reliance on motor vehicles. It good for the environment and improves traffic congestion. If more people pick up cycling, it makes the nation more healthy as well. It is similar to how the government gives ActiveSG credits to get the citizens to try to be more active. The list goes on. You are not wrong but you need to think about the other size of the debate.
@@ryantan1022 with dedicated cyclist path/lane, this would minimise possible accidents with pedestrians, esp the elderly groups ... unless you want the govt to ban cycling completely.
If drivers and cyclists and pedestrians all insist on their rights, there will bechaos.
Courtesy and giving way to others will solve a lot of these problems
No set of rules is perfect, but I think the general principle should be that a cyclist adopts the same postion that a car would when turning or doing anything else on the road. Drivers then know what to expect, in that the cyclist will be doing exactly as a car would do. Drivers should also regard cyclists as taking up exactly the same road space as a car, even though they don't! A bike is about 0.5m wide and if you add the recommended gap when passing a cyclist of 1.5m you get 2m, which is the width of a car.
I agree that Amsterdam has something close to ideal cycle infrastrcuture, but the Dutch had the sense to ensure that cyclists were provided for, when the number of cars on the road rapidly increased in the 1960's. No other country did and therefore almost every country, not just Singapore, is now trying to catch up. It will probably take decades to install that infrastructure in most countries. I thereofore totally agree that cyclists and motorists need to learn to share the road. It's not a problem in Amsterdam, as over 80% of the drivers cycle at least once a week and almost all adult cyclists also drive. Cyclists and motorists are therefore the same group of people. When 80% of Singaporeans ride a bike at least once a week, the cyclist/motorist conflict will have disappeared!
Thank you for this video
Good thing owning a car in Singapore is so expensive
this is why cyclist mix between roads and footpaths/cyclepaths, we determine at which point is the safest and go that route, it may seem inconsiderate but technically no wrong for bicycle to do this
The reason all these are happening is because our bike infrastructure is not complete. One side of the road have cycling path but the opposite doesn't. Cycling paths could end halfway and have to share it with padestsrians and cycle on the normal footpaths. Sometimes, don't understand why there are people that also walk on cycling path too when footpath is right beside them
@@tanalson ikr they die2 wanna walk on cycling path later bang cry mother cry father really knn cb mindset of those people
Yes our infrastructure is incomplete.
However our govt no intention to make bike lanes like the EU, we can only suffer through this kind of silly pavement/pcn network which will just kinda sow discord between cyclist, motorist and pedestrians.