Fatigue Stress Concentration - Grooved Rod Factor of Safety for Infinite Life - Example 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • Fatigue Strength - Endurance Limit
    Static Stress Concentration Factor for a Grooved Round Bar in Bending
    Notch Sensitivity Factor
    Factor of Safety for Infinity Life
    Alternating Stress
    Marin Factors
    Main Video: Fatigue Stress Concentrations in Just Over 10 Minutes
    • Fatigue STRESS CONCENT...
    Example 2: • Fatigue Stress Concent...
    Example 3: • Fatigue Stress Concent...
    Marin Factors for Endurance Limits in Just Over 10 Minutes
    • Marin Factors for ENDU...
    _____________________________________________
    Other "Mechanical Engineering Design 1" Links:
    1. Axial Loading Review • Axial Loading Review f...
    2. Torsion Review • Torsion Review for Mec...
    3. Pure Bending and Deflection Review • Bending Review for Mec...
    4. Pure Bending and Deflection Combined Example • Deflection of Beams Re...
    5. Shear and First Moment About Neutral Axis Review • Transverse Shear Revie...
    6. Mohr's Circle Review • COMPLETE Mohr's Circle...
    7. Brittle Failure Theories - Fracture Criteria • Brittle Failure Theori...
    8. Ductile Failure Theories - Yield Criteria • Ductile Failure Theori...
    9. Design Factor and Uncertainty vs. Factor of Safety • DESIGN FACTOR and Unce...
    10. Tolerance Stack Ups and Tolerance Loops • Uncertainty for Design...
    11. Castigliano's Theorem • Castigliano's Theorem ...
    12. Fracture Toughness • FRACTURE TOUGHNESS and...
    13. Crack Propagation • CRACK PROPAGATION and ...
    14. Fatigue SN Diagrams • Fatigue (Strength-Numb...
    15. Marin Factors and Corrected Endurance Limit • Marin Factors for ENDU...
    16. Fatigue Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity Factors • Fatigue STRESS CONCENT...
    17. Fatigue Failure Criteria • Fatigue FAILURE CRITER...
    18. Shaft Design and Iterative Process • Shaft Design for INFIN...
    19. Power Screws - Torque to Force Relationship • Power Screws - Torque ...
    20. Screw Thread Stress • Stresses at Screw Thre...
    21. Fastener and Member Stiffness • Bolt (Fasteners) and M...
    22. Bolt Tension • BOLT TENSION and Tensi...
    23. Proof Strength and Factors of Safety • PROOF STRENGTH - Facto...
    24. Spring Stress and Spring Constant • Mechanical Springs - S...
    25. Shearing Yield Strength and Presetting • Springs - PRESETTING a...
    26. Springs Fatigue - Zimmerli Data • Springs Fatigue and ZI...
    27. Spring Design Restrictions • Mechanical SPRING DESI...
    28. Extension Springs • EXTENSION SPRING Desig...
    29. Gear Relations and Nomenclature • GEARS BASICS - Nomencl...
    30. Gear Trains and Planetary Gears - Mechanical Advantage • Gear Trains and PLANET...
    31. Spur Gear Forces and Force Components • Gear Forces and Power ...
    32. Helical and Bevel Gear Forces • Gear Forces of HELICAL...
    33. Worm Gear Forces • WORM GEARS - Forces an...
    34. Bending Stress at the Teeth - Lewis Form Factor • LEWIS BENDING STRESS a...
    35. Pitting - Surface Compressive Stress • Gear PITTING - Surface...
    36. Bearing Radial Loads • BEARINGS BASICS and Be...
    37. Bearing Reliability • Bearings RELIABILITY a...
    38. Bearing Axial Loads and Equivalent Combined Loads • Bearings - COMBINED Ra...

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @LessBoringLectures
    @LessBoringLectures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    CORRECTION: A 2:23 the final answer for σ_ar should be 51.35 ksi instead of 32.34 (I divided by 1.8^4 instead of 1.8^3)

  • @handekonuralp6662
    @handekonuralp6662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why and how did we find the equivalent radius? Why de=(0.37).d ?

  • @yaswanthkumar2657
    @yaswanthkumar2657 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    loved your videos.Keep making content and views will follow.

  • @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240
    @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you please recheck the calculation of "Sigma-r"?

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Added it as a correction comment. Thanks for catching this!

    • @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240
      @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LessBoringLectures Thanks for the correction note. So the nf is less than 1, am I right?

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup. Means it would fail.

  • @hammadotn
    @hammadotn ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, where can i get the notes of these lecture?

  • @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240
    @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which text do you use as the reference Shigley's Machine design? So if yes, could you , please, check the coefficient "a" and the exponent "b" for Machined surface in surface factor "Ka"? Table 6-2: a=2.7 & b=- 0.265
    Thanks.

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately, the values change depending of the version of the book. The value 2.7 is in fact the new value for a (it used to be 2.0 in the 9th or 10th edition). HOWEVER, remember that the purpose of textbooks is to explain a concept, not provide accurate material properties or parameters that you should be using in real applications. Hope this helps!

    • @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240
      @mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LessBoringLectures Sir, I already checked the editions 9th, 10th and even 6th for the values of "a" and "b", were close to 2.7 for "a" and exactly -0.265 for "b". Although I agree with your logic but in world of engineering, numerical values mater.
      Thanks a lot for your responses and videos.

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mohammadesmaeilzadeh8240 www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/please-submit-36334-even-think-answer-wrong-professor-confirmed-ot-glitch-submit-answer-di-q47082190
      Might have the wrong version number, but it's definitely in a version of Shigley's, as you can see in the link above.
      The numerical values DO matter, I agree, and that's why you never trust values in a textbook. That's why there's engineering handbooks and other online resources.
      Thanks for checking though! It's good to have the most recent info.

  • @JavierGonzalez-rd7kg
    @JavierGonzalez-rd7kg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. In 1:47 where did 32M come from?

    • @LessBoringLectures
      @LessBoringLectures  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/DuPtVa8mejc/w-d-xo.html It's always the same for all solid rods subjected to bending. Hope it helps.