I have a lot of respect for Chuck because he often says "this is my opinion" "do your own research". These days we have many teachers who have it all figured out. We know that only fools have it all figured out.
Never heard of you but you got my interest i was ready to give up sleep All day thinking I miss it believe no hope for me cause I've sinned and suppose to be a Christian now I'm down im. Under a satanic attack and attack i need help please pray for me
The text says the animal sacrifices are for sin but Chuck says they are for a memorial. Which is it? My understanding is that Christ was the final sacrifice for all time(Hebrews).
There will believers and non believers in the millennium. Sounds wild but we will be in the millennium as saved people with resurrected bodies, then there will be believers and non believers as well - in the millennium
Hey I hope I can shed some light here and for anyone who is reading this The book of Hebrews does not say Christ was the final sacrifice for all time, the book of Hebrews says Christ was the once and for all sacrifice in the context of actually taking away sins. There is no more need for another sacrifice for taking away sins. (Heb 10:10,14) Hebrews tells us the sacrifices in the OT could never take away sins, and that is why we need a new and better covenant and Jesus Christ to actually take away our sins (Heb 10:4) Jesus’s blood accomplishes what the old Levitical system could never, the purification of the conscious and taking away sin. The Levitical priesthood has been done away with and we are now under the melchzidekian priesthood. So if this is the case, why does the OT say that the sacrifices make atonement? (Lev 4:20) and why does the book of Ezekiel here also say the animal sacrifices are for sin? Hebrews also explains that the OT sacrifices does make atonement, but not in the sense of adding to or taking away from the work of Jesus on the cross. They don’t take away sin, they don’t purify the conscious, but they do purify the flesh. Heb 9:13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, Heb 9:14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God. OT sacrifices pointed forward to Christ and made atonement which purified the flesh, not take away sins The New Covenant Sacrifices will also make atonement for sin in the same way the old did, now having cleared consciousness because of the work of Christ, these sacrifices will point back to his work and purify the flesh for those ministering to him and for cleansing Also we know Christ’s sacrifice was not the final sacrifice of all time because after he died on the cross Sacrifices continued until 70AD when the temple was destroyed, Paul himself participated in two occasions in the book of Acts, but Christ’s sacrifice is the final sacrifice of all time for the actual forgiveness of sins not simply purification of the flesh
When you realize Jesus will be teaching in this era you understand why keeping sabbath and all of Gods holy commandments vitally important to reward after salvation. If this teaching is a mystery it should not be
Yes I seen video of that' guy is over there talking to pastor Binghamton alive and he said off video that Yes The Jews have the ark this is up on up from main Man
That the ark is in Ethiopia is wild conjecture. But beyond that Hebrews tells us the new order of the Priesthood of Jesus. He abolished all of the ceremonial laws of the blood of bulls, goats and lambs. Anyone conducting this ritual is doing this against the blood of Christ. The representation of the animals were shadows. We now have the real thing and all shadows are abolished. Would it not be an abomination to perform this again? If there is no more Levitical Priesthood, how will they perform these duties as a sacrifice acceptable to the Father? Hebrews 8:13 makes it obvious "In that he says, A new covenant, he has made the first old. Now that which decays and wax old is ready to vanish away." by "vanish away" the Holy Spirit himself testifies, no other sacrifice(s) can be accepted but a curse on those who rely on them. Hebrews 9:12 says he "entered once" meaning final. Hebrews 10:18 "Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin." No more... But your interpretation lays this out after Christ atonement who is The High Priest. I'm convinced the High Priest was involved in the cleansing of the temple Aaron had to in the initiation of the desert temple. As Jesus cleansed the temple in his time. Zadoc cannot be working along side Jesus as Priest. Yet Ezekiel 43:19 states " And thou shalt give to the priests the Levites that be of the seed of Zadok, which approach unto me, to minister unto me, saith the Lord GOD, a young bullock for a sin offering." Meaning this happened before Christ paid the price of his own blood. OT sacrifices were never expiatory in an of itself as God told them if it did not accompany faith, it was ineffective.
Ethiopia had the scriptures or the written testimonies of the Hebrews .Probably the earliest to have according to Ken Johnson,who has the dead sea scrolls.. Ethiopia had a library where the writings were first stored .I believe.
No, bc it says in Revelation and Isaiah that there will be healing from plants, well that's what it eludes to. But it also says that is someone dies at 100 it will be bc of sin and will be so young its as if a baby dies. But...I don't understand about the sacrifices either.
Sunday school church does not teach this stuff it’s light years beyond salvation best I can tell you is keep all 613 commandment that apply to you there is reward in it for you. Not to be saved but because you are
My favorite teacher!
I have a lot of respect for Chuck because he often says "this is my opinion" "do your own research". These days we have many teachers who have it all figured out. We know that only fools have it all figured out.
SO true
AGREED!
Thanks for posting. God bless you and family.
Never heard of you but you got my interest i was ready to give up sleep All day thinking I miss it believe no hope for me cause I've sinned and suppose to be a Christian now I'm down im. Under a satanic attack and attack i need help please pray for me
The text says the animal sacrifices are for sin but Chuck says they are for a memorial. Which is it? My understanding is that Christ was the final sacrifice for all time(Hebrews).
I wondered that myself. I have read several references as well and no one seems to agree. 🤔
There will believers and non believers in the millennium. Sounds wild but we will be in the millennium as saved people with resurrected bodies, then there will be believers and non believers as well - in the millennium
Hey I hope I can shed some light here and for anyone who is reading this
The book of Hebrews does not say Christ was the final sacrifice for all time, the book of Hebrews says Christ was the once and for all sacrifice in the context of actually taking away sins. There is no more need for another sacrifice for taking away sins. (Heb 10:10,14) Hebrews tells us the sacrifices in the OT could never take away sins, and that is why we need a new and better covenant and Jesus Christ to actually take away our sins (Heb 10:4) Jesus’s blood accomplishes what the old Levitical system could never, the purification of the conscious and taking away sin. The Levitical priesthood has been done away with and we are now under the melchzidekian priesthood.
So if this is the case, why does the OT say that the sacrifices make atonement? (Lev 4:20) and why does the book of Ezekiel here also say the animal sacrifices are for sin?
Hebrews also explains that the OT sacrifices does make atonement, but not in the sense of adding to or taking away from the work of Jesus on the cross. They don’t take away sin, they don’t purify the conscious, but they do purify the flesh.
Heb 9:13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh,
Heb 9:14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.
OT sacrifices pointed forward to Christ and made atonement which purified the flesh, not take away sins
The New Covenant Sacrifices will also make atonement for sin in the same way the old did, now having cleared consciousness because of the work of Christ, these sacrifices will point back to his work and purify the flesh for those ministering to him and for cleansing
Also we know Christ’s sacrifice was not the final sacrifice of all time because after he died on the cross Sacrifices continued until 70AD when the temple was destroyed, Paul himself participated in two occasions in the book of Acts, but Christ’s sacrifice is the final sacrifice of all time for the actual forgiveness of sins not simply purification of the flesh
When you realize Jesus will be teaching in this era you understand why keeping sabbath and all of Gods holy commandments vitally important to reward after salvation. If this teaching is a mystery it should not be
Do you think the trurd temple will be built to these specs or by the original specs that Solomon followed
ron wyatt found the ark, it’s in jerusalem directly underneath where Jesus was crucified
😊😊
Yes I seen video of that' guy is over there talking to pastor Binghamton alive and he said off video that Yes The Jews have the ark this is up on up from main Man
That the ark is in Ethiopia is wild conjecture. But beyond that Hebrews tells us the new order of the Priesthood of Jesus. He abolished all of the ceremonial laws of the blood of bulls, goats and lambs. Anyone conducting this ritual is doing this against the blood of Christ. The representation of the animals were shadows. We now have the real thing and all shadows are abolished. Would it not be an abomination to perform this again? If there is no more Levitical Priesthood, how will they perform these duties as a sacrifice acceptable to the Father? Hebrews 8:13 makes it obvious "In that he says, A new covenant, he has made the first old. Now that which decays and wax old is ready to vanish away." by "vanish away" the Holy Spirit himself testifies, no other sacrifice(s) can be accepted but a curse on those who rely on them. Hebrews 9:12 says he "entered once" meaning final. Hebrews 10:18 "Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin." No more... But your interpretation lays this out after Christ atonement who is The High Priest. I'm convinced the High Priest was involved in the cleansing of the temple Aaron had to in the initiation of the desert temple. As Jesus cleansed the temple in his time. Zadoc cannot be working along side Jesus as Priest. Yet Ezekiel 43:19 states " And thou shalt give to the priests the Levites that be of the seed of Zadok, which approach unto me, to minister unto me, saith the Lord GOD, a young bullock for a sin offering." Meaning this happened before Christ paid the price of his own blood. OT sacrifices were never expiatory in an of itself as God told them if it did not accompany faith, it was ineffective.
Ethiopia had the scriptures or the written testimonies of the Hebrews .Probably the earliest to have according to Ken Johnson,who has the dead sea scrolls.. Ethiopia had a library where the writings were first stored .I believe.
Why animal sacrifce ??? Why people keep shedding blood in hospitals ..having accidents..etc...people still sin still get sick
No, bc it says in Revelation and Isaiah that there will be healing from plants, well that's what it eludes to. But it also says that is someone dies at 100 it will be bc of sin and will be so young its as if a baby dies.
But...I don't understand about the sacrifices either.
Where's the location of the millenial temple?
Jerusalem
I am completely confused.
Sunday school church does not teach this stuff it’s light years beyond salvation best I can tell you is keep all 613 commandment that apply to you there is reward in it for you. Not to be saved but because you are