मगर कानून की आंख पर तो पट्टी बंदी रहती है तो आंख होकर भी मतलब क्या क्यो न पट्टी खोल कर आंखों से देखकर और न्याय प्रणाली को सुरक्षित की जा सकती वरना तो महाभारत में दुर्योधन के पिता की आंखे नही होते हुवे महाभारत बना विनाश कारी कही अपनी भी व्यवस्ता आंखे होते हुवे कवरव पिता की तरह हल करने मुश्किल लगती है अगर आंख ओ कमी में सुनने में कमी, और बताने में कमी फिर तो चलना आया तो दिव्यांग भी तो आरक्षण ले सकता कानून को भी तो 18अठारा 36% जीएसटी के बदले वापस आरक्षण मिलता होगा विशेस टिप्पणी देशीहीतमे में जनवासी के लिए है सोच बड़ी होनी चाहिए अनहोनी तो अमर है काया छोड़ने के बाद भी मोक्ष की राह जी जी जयदेशी हम और आप zee.??! जयहिन्द वन्देमातरम.! जयमहाराष्ट्र.!💐💐💐
1. Yes husbands should be entitled to alimony, just like wives 2. This is fair , wives should not be allowed to separate their husband from his parents. But same should apply for husbands too, and a woman should be allowed to take care of her parents as well 3. Its fair. A woman should not be forced to have children 4. Its fair, as long as wives are also debarred from seeking divorce on grounds of infertility or impotence. None of these judgments were woke, they were all fair.
I agree with you on 2nd one. What about parents who just have no son and the son in laws do not accept them? The law are not thought from this perspective. Afterall patriarchy still prevails in Indai.
1. Correct 2.wrong because sometimes daily taunt by mother in-law is not understand by husband and patriarchal society they thinks its normal when she disrespect you in front of family or others. 3. Correct 4.correct
As a woman, i approve and appreciate these laws. Men are neither inferior, nor superior....they're humans- just like us females...and they are entitled to dignity
Then why women leave parents & men dont get divorced by women if he separates that woman to leave parents after marriage.... It is still a misnomer that woman & men have equal rights....
@@knowledgeplus177well there are some bi local and ambilocal families. and some couples make their diffrent residence from either of their parents after marriage. +it's not that girl's cant ever visit or live at their parents after marriage you know. +in the end ghar jamai bana hai to ladki ko itna to kamana hoga ki vo apne parents ka dhyan rakh sake🙌
@@mazakmazakmein3437 girls can visit only .... but boys are staying at theor own... so girls should stay at their own place .... & boy should sometimes visit theor parents .
@@knowledgeplus177 are Didi bola toh kuch log hote hai Ghar jamai. Mei argument nhi Kar rha bas Bata rha hu ki ladki ladke ke Ghar rhe Ya vice versa, vo depend karta hai families and couple pe. Par yeh chiz ke baare Mei families aur couple baat hi nhi karte.
@@plotzbitter4919 not after America but since big corporates, thinking tanks and other institutions have started using their propaganda by justifying it's woke
This happens but do you know most married women who choose or had to stay at their mother's home face cruelty by their brothers wife if they stay for a long time.
Men have to live with their parents because they have to support their family whereas women don't even support themselves thus they ask how much the man earns if a woman doesn't want to leave her parents then she should marry a man who earns less than them.
@@313_Sherry I don't know where you live but at my house at least both my sister and I are expected to work and take care of our parents even after marriage
One judgement should be allowing a women to live with her parents after marriage atleast if parents have no other caregiver children. Every human gets old and deserve care, no matter whether they give birth to a boy or girl
Same thing i feel...if patents have only girls,what about them? Husband's parents have right to live with son but what about girls parents? They will quickly give sake of society norms...
Not the 4th one .. I completely disagree with the 4th judgement .. human(man or women) should be given rights to come out of a marriage if their partner is infertile. I would not. But I would be grumpy till the end of life and that’s not healthy ..
behn ye har baat ko gender pe hi kyu le jaati ho, thoda socha bhi karo. ye law na hi men ke liye hai na hi women ke liye ye to un maa baak ke adhikar surakshit rakhne ke liye banaya gya. jara socho jis tarah ek patni apne sas sasur ko chhodne ke liye kehti hai aur tumhare hisab se chhod dena chahiye to fir behn tumhare bhi maa baap hai unko kaun dekhega??
In favour of the judgements 👏🏻. 2nd and 4th law should go both ways. A husband shouldn't force his wife to look after his parents if she doesn't want to and keep her away from her parents. A wife shouldn't demand divorce on the grounds of husband's infertility too.
One, if Husband can claim divorce just because the wife doesn’t want to be with his parents, how come the wife is expected to leave her parents and come and live with her in laws. Isn’t that cruel as well. Two, Claiming divorce because your partner is infertile should be completely up to an individual’s personal choice, some men might want to be a father, why force him to stay in a marriage, when he clearly doesn’t want to. What kind of ridiculousness is this?
@@shahzaman365 I agree with your second point brother. But in the first case, this is the norm. And just look at which court gave this judgement. It's Kolkata HC. WB is a maternalist society. Things like these happen in WB
@@shaswatchatterjee3395 Justifying oppression in the name of norm is not okay. No one should be forced to live and be in a arrangement they don’t want to. If husband can expect his wife to live with his parents, the wife should also have the right. I am saying that, being a Bangladeshi man. I used look up to India as a country, growing up in a family that had a very deep hatred for Pakistan because of 1971 and love for India due to the same reason, for me India was a progressive secular nation, but now day by day it’s getting more and more regressive. It saddens my heart to witness the direction this nation, my neighbours are heading towards. And it’s coming from a place of love and concern, nothing else.
@@shahzaman365 Glad to hear about your love for India brother. But changing of house and surname has been continuing since ages. No matter the religion or the region, this culture remains the same. Even in a maternalist society like WB, this happens too. And I don't think women have a problem with this. Because even they know that it is what it is. Ofcourse initially there might be problems in adjustments, but the society and the world at large have been accustomed with this custom
1. Equal rights. Very sound judgement 2. Fair, but similar laws should be made for women as well. 3. Best judgement. Women should have rights to bodily anatomy. 4. Good. Genetilia size or infertility should not be a ground for divorce
Well the father is not the one who's gonna suffer for 9 months, is he? The mood swings, cravings, hormonal changes and (usually) morning sickness takes a huge toll on both body and mind. Not everyone woman wants to go through that. It's a conversation that needs to be held before marriage.
1,2,4 judgement sahi hai 3rd judgement bilkul bhi sahi nhi hai... Bacche lene par husband aur wife dono ka equal sahemati hona chahie khali wife ka nhi.. Humare indian culture me saadi koi long time sexsual agreement ki tara dekha nhi jata... Ase to wife badla lene ke liye aapne pati par ghar wale par case daal sakta hai..
Pregnancy should be a choice, for atleast few years.. like.. 4 to 5 years.. Continuously Denying pregnacy should be held under cruelty... Woman cannot just marry a man for what a man provides (as happens generally)
1 - fair enough whoever earns more should pay 2 - couples live separately unless anyone's parents need constant care(personal opinion) 3 - discuss kids before marriage(parents should not be involved in this discussion) 4 - infertility is nobody's fault
This is exactly why these are anti men laws. Infertile wife is no ground for divorce but infertile husband is. And also if you dont want to have children then why should someone marry you?!
@@7ManishRairip English and gender equality pe hass kar cool lgne ka try kr rhe ho agar itna hi gender equality pe ab hasna aa rha h to "why purush Pradhan samaj" vo to itne saalo se hota aa rha h women ko oppressed kiya jaa rha tha tab nhi gender equality yaad aai kisi ko
@@Tripathi991 han ek jese eradicate women reservation Free bus service in Delhi and Karnataka Also equalise registeration fees men(6%) and women(4%) And maintenance Dower in muslim Ammend article 16 ,17 Right? Tub equality gae gutter me
Indeed I totally agree with the court, husband or Wife cannot force their partner to stay away from their parents. And if I do that my wife has every right to divorce me. Imagine how you will feel if someone does the same.
@@bansaltalks4589 ladkiya apne gar ke liye pariye hote h usko Jana he hota h chae ro ke ya has ke Tabhe to unhe ma to bada darza Diya jata h society me ek Bahu ko jada samman Diya Jata h uske husband se 😊
It is called common sense. Second law should be that wife can not stop husband from visiting his parents and paying them support from his salary. For comments, I would clarify few things. 1. I have no problem if a girl is supporting her parents from her own salary after contributing her share to household expenses, even during marriage. As long as she is not being exploited by her siblings to take care of her parents. Please focus on the term exploited. 2. I am barely telling a common thought, it is not a paramount truth. For example, wife also has the right to stop her husband from being exploited by his siblings or parents. Every situation demands different solution. 3. When I say financially support, I mean basic financial support divided between siblings based on their disposal income. 4. I said visiting his parents. I am already assuming they live separately. Please stop commenting about elderly tradition of pressuring daughter in law.
These are not woke , these are sensible and should be normal for everyone , the last one seems a little bit grey if one of them is capable and other one is not.
The 4th one is the reason for Western culture being followed in India. We didn't know when modernization became westernization. Women and men marrying in 30s many suffering P.C.O.D due to hormonal imbalance. Men don't have good sperm count and so on😢
@@debasishsadhu2333 so women would make sperms . So women would share half of their property after divorce. So if men don't want to provide for child then you can't force them . You can't find because you are simp son .
4th one should have been like it the wife was infertile before the marriage and she hid the fact from her husband even after marriage then husband can file divorce but if husband knew about wife infertility and despite that they still both agreed to marry then husband can't file for divorce one sidedly.
Second one is unfair until the same rules get applied to men You cannot force women away from their parents in the name of culture. Both male and female counterpart is capable of taking care of their parents...so either both take that responsibility or you cannot hold anyone of them accountable
Who did force one to leave their house...? Before marriage you already know about these terms you are all free to say no or put forwardyour terms of marriage...if they are okay with it..then all good.
@@abhish3k115 No first tell me why is this stereotype is made and if a woman can leave her house in which she have lived almost her whole life, then why a man can't do this. When for his love she can sacrifice her life with her parents then why a man can't do this
@@jahnavi1607 man also do that even parents allow them like my maternal uncle allow his wife to stay at her father's house bcz her mother is no more and her father is specially able and she is the only child at house ....but the court here is saying about one can't force other to leave their parents...just like man can ask his wife to have baby but he can't force pregnancy on her... Edit: I respect women for all the sacrifices they make throughout their life, same goes with man..
Actually yeh cheez bahut Kam hoti hai ki if male is infertile then the girl seperates, India mein even baccha na paida hone ka Karan majorly blame female ls pe dala jata h, even if the male is infertile. But yes l agree with your statement too, but jyada common males ka divorce Dena hota hai apni wives ko child n hone ke liye
If anyone gay or lesbie, and the male or female counterparts would not be able to get biological offspring of his/her own, then that should and must be a ground for separation or divorce, whatever for that matter if the spouse doesn't want continuation in that husband-wife relationship.
@@sandeepanayak1479 I dont totally disagree with your point. Definitely a male or a female has the right to have their biological offspring and if a male or a female do not want to continue their life with an infertile partner then they should be allowed to file a divorce.
@@himanshichaudhary9404 I don't agree with the point ki females ke sath esa zyada hota hai. Most common reasons for divorce in modern society is not infertility or something serious but it is the inability to adapt the situations that the couple has created for themselves by getting into a marriage.
@@jaishriram1069 i disagree. Meri gali maine 2 case dekh liye Bhai. Ladki bcha paida nahi kar skti, so the husbands want to separate from their wives 2 salo ka pyar phur gya Pr i have never seen a woman seeking divorce just bcz he is infertile (in real life aise cases bhot rare Milenge) To thoda data bhi padh lo.. opinion dene se pahle
Indeed I totally agree with the court, husband or Wife cannot force their partner to stay away from their parents. And if I do that my wife has every right to divorce me. Imagine how you will feel if someone does the same.
If a women is the only child of the parents she cannot be forced to leave to her husband's house after marriage because like a responsible male child she is also to take care of her parents
Second one is not woke at all. It should be mutual. Husband can also not tell wife to leave her parents. If wife is leaving parents and husband should be too. Else wife should be allowed to live with her parents.
No-one forces. The girl can demand a guy like ki and ka's Arjun Kapoor. It's their priority. The only thing there is important which is transparency should be from the beginning and the demand must not come after the wedding.
Yeah....but hardly any woman wants to marry an unemployed man....lol If a woman can marry an unemployed man without disrespecting him n laws guarantee that she will have to take monetary responsibility of the man so a man will never force her to get separated from her parents.
Chal Bey Chutiya Aurat... Last Wala Ek Dum Galat Hai, Tum Agar Baanjh Ho Toh Kya Tumhara Pati Napunsak Ban Ke Mar Jaaye ? Bhale Hi Tumhe Divorce Dena Sahi Nahin Hoga Par Uss Ko Pura Haq Hai Dusri Shaadi Kar Ke Bachche Ka Baap Banne Ka
@@nightflame9895 Nah u misinterpreted that law ..vo ye khna chahte h ki agr koi wife apne in laws ko preshan krke unhe beghr krna chahe to divorce file ho skta h husband ki side se …See kuch wives hoti h aisi I hv seen isliye mrko ye sensible lga …Or bat rhi apne in laws se alg rhne ki to vo baat alg h and choice h ..😊 I agree that force ni krna chye sath rhne ko
@@SoumyajitDey-The_RealChad.I understand this negative connotation of the word "woke" is due to the westerners making it seem bad. Their woke people are blasphemous and distorting the meaning of the word for everyone
What if maintenance claim will only be allowed for the one who is going to keep and care child and if their is no child than the one who is rich enough will have to give maintenance to the other one but only if he/she is not able to work or not educated enough for work (only have to give maintenance for their education period) and this period will be decided by court and if other one did not follow and start study or work he/she will lose their maintenance claim
It doesn't just mean 'progressive' cause if it would have been, that would not have been a slang but a synonym for the word progressive. Woke nowadays is used to describe people who are overly progressive with extreme leftist ideologies.
Aur bhai sabse badi baat to ye ki 'woke' sirf past tense hai 'wake' word ka. And if an year ago even if it meant being 'progressive', now it's mostly negatively used. So the video didn't age well cause i(and definitely a lot of viewers) would literally be confused whether she is praising the decisions or being sarcastic.
2nd law seems so unfair. because there is no law that prevents husbands from stopping his wife from looking after her parents. there are so many husbands who forcefully stop their wives from financially supporting her parents and family members. 2nd law shouldgo both ways
True. Girls are supposed to spend money only for that family and kids. Not her parents. And if I stay there for his parents for 24 hours, then who will stay at my parental home to take care of my parents? I am a victim of this and filed divorce
How is this possible? A girl has to leave her parents' house after marriage, it's the tradition of every marriage in the world. So your point is irrelevant.
the 3rd one must have specific conditons. Since both a male and female contribute to the formation of the fetus, the woman cannot take sole responsibility for the termination. Also if the inlaws r pressuring her for a child and she doesnt want to get pregnant then it becomes a choice solely for the woman The 4th one also reserves a condition. If the woman never revailed that she was infertile before marriage then it might be a case of cheating the husband.
Definitely husband's should get the right for maintenance sometimes wife's earn good and gain positions and abandon their husbands like a tarsh. The second one Then who made the law that it is must for a girl to leave her parents house ,with whom she lived for 25 to 30 years Sometime it really becomes difficult for women due to several reasons to mingle with her in laws . * But one should never leave old and needy parents on themselves.
@@ThankYouGoogle4 women will better understand this ,that to present day women born in 90 s who have built a bit difference. Time k saath saath paramparae change hoti hi hain yahi achhi baat bhi hai.
@@As-vh8mo well only some tradition change bit all and I agree with you that women should have a choice in paleolithic era like most mammals males have to leave their group and join another to prevent inbreeding but in our ancestors females leave their groups and this tradition continues to us. Even today you can see male lions and primates leaving their family once they matured
No, not at all. Marriage rule is when a girl gets married, she has to leave her parents house and make her husband's family, hers own family. It is not vice versa. Today, girls and girls families try to change the real tradition of marriage, that is why most of the marriages are falling apart. Ulti Ganga bahane ki koshish naa Karo. Itna bhi equality sahi nahi hai.. Agar sahi hota to prakriti mard ko bhi bachcha janam Dene aur doodh pilane ki capability deta. Har cheez mein equal nature ne hi nahi banaya hai to kyun itna equal home ke liye chaati pitna?
The time you are talking about that time people used to have 5-10 children. Nowadays we are mostly single child or two sisters. Everything changes dear. You cannot do monarchy in the name of culture.
So clear these things before marriage,If you don't want to seperate with your parents and she clearly mentioned wife not Pheonce and in India I think all girls are well aware before their marriage that they had to seperate from their Parents so girl should demand or otherwise don't get married
More 2 rules should be added..Firstly parents can't force their children to marry... Secondly waise husband ya in laws Jo larkio ko apne mmy papa ka dekhbhal nahi karne dete h... wo v divorce seek Kar pae....
1,2,4 sahi hai 3rd judgememt sahi nhi hai bacche lene par husband aur wife dono ka decision jaroori hai.. sirf wife ka nhi Humare culture me saadi koi deal nhi hai.. Agr baccha nhi lena hai to saadi maat karo...
@@SimranSimmi-ry8cm saadi ek sansar banane ke liye kiya jata hai... srirti, society ko sustain karne ke liye.. Isliye bacche bhi ahem hai. Tum west ki paidaish saadi ko long time sexsual agreement dekhte ho usme mein kuch nhi kar sakta.. aab habas me dube hue log kaise samjhenge.
@@disco688 I mean still it's her body, lots of women's are forced to get pregnant because of her In -laws or parents. I think giving birth should be both husband and wifes decision. But women shouldn't have to be forced in it . She is the onee who gonna take all the pain and carry child for 9 month, so I think she can make the decision
@@Shubham-wl7irmarrying doesn't mean you have the obligation to serve your in-laws...a husband marries a wife but a wife marries the whole family...why???
@@Shubham-wl7irmaa baap k seva k liye nurse rakho q k ladka sasural ka dekhval nhi krta or pehli baat saadi pati Patni k bich hoti h or family bnane k liye future k liye Kia jata hai naa ki Patni or ladke or ladke k khandan k saath taaki puri life free ka nurse or maid mil sake
Honestly, if a man refuses to stay married to you, because you're infertile... it's better to get a divorce, because having kids is a big part of marriage, but it is also not JUST about kids. He probably doesn't love you, he just loves the idea of having kids, which he probably won't take care of. Also the first case about husband getting maintenance is absolutely right.
Aadhi problems toh shaadi se phele hi communicate karke khatam ki ja sakti hai. Kon kamayega, kon ghar pe rahega, ya phir dono working honge. Akele rahenge ya dono mai se kisi ek ke parivar ke saath. Bacha chahiye ki nahi. "Mujhe ____ (insert health problems) hai, tum batao tumhe konsi dikkate hai" All it takes a discussion taki aage jake future mai problem na ho its that simple...
@@midnightrain3567 Tbh isilye love marriage have a lil better scope, when u know the person for more than 2-3 years tab sab malum rheta hai cuz ek insaan 3-4 mahino mai comfortable ho jata hai and apne asli rang dhika deta hai. Tab bhi uske saath relation acha chal raha then go for marriage TwT
If a girl is found to have used dowry harassment and domestic violence to harass or extort money from the man after divorce, but all allegations are found to be false she should be tried and jailed
This is incredibly stupid, this won't work for the same reason you don't get jailed for theft , rape ,etc allegations.If people are afraid that they will be jailed for alleging then they will be reluctant to take action. If your partner is rich, powerfull, has connections or there is lack of evidence then not only will the accused not be given justice(thanks to wonderfull Indian police and judiciary) but will also face trial and could get punished themselves. It should be responsibility of society to not judge someone because of unproved allegations , not law
@@NIceGAl-sr5fj This is not rape, theft it’s dowry and people like record this in marriage video or when you are buying stuff you will get bills its very easy to prove. If you can’t either you are brain dead or faking
Wife also should be allowed to stay with her parents !! If her husband forces her to leave her parents' house , she also should be able to claim divorce...
The husband of a wife not force her to leave har parents , rather than girls are selfish and willing to leave her parent . And her parents had make her out from their family and home . It not what I says , it what reality says . So, nothing wrong is there in the system .
And our I ndan constitution had already given 14 right in favor of girls and 0 in favor of boys . So the Judiciary had make justice . Now , in the present situation boys are the silent suffers of domestic violence. So, it is essential that the court make some laws in favor and for the protection of boys . That's all thank you . Jai Hind .Jai Bharat
@@TarunjitSarkar-pv6omkonse khet ke chutiya ho yaar. Agar English nahi aati to hindi me hi baat karlo koo rok tok nahi hai. Ladkiyo ko extra rights mile hai kyuki unhe need hai. Ladko ke rapes itne nahi hote jitne ladkiyo ke hote hai. Koi ladka raat me bahar nikal jae to baare me koi afwahe nahi phelti jese ladkiyo ke saath hota hai. Offices me boss log ladko ka sexually faida nahi uthate jese ladkiyo ka uthate hai. Aate jaate raasto me koi ladko ko catcall or peecha karke unsafe feel nahi karata. Ladko ko har jagah jaane ki azaadi hoti hai ladkiyo ko gharo me band rakha jata hai. Is sab se ladke kese suffer kar rahe hai? Kya domestic violence? Agar ladkiyo ko thode rights milgae to esa kya attyachaar hogaya? Har ladki fake rape case file nahi karati lekin har ladki ke saath ek na ek sexual assault waali ghatna hui hai.
Male apne favour wale judgment ko leke khush hai aur female apne favour wale ke liye.. pr koi ek dusre ke support mei nhi h .😂😂 Insensitive hote ja raha hai insaan.. yhi h aaj ki sachchai sab khud ke liye sochte hai ..
if a women does not want to let her husband to be with his parents and if it is wrong ... Then how a man expect that women have to leave her parents after marriage why it is not wrong because women also love their parents as man do .....🤐
Women can also choose to go to Her husband's house but because of society mentality woman often choose to go . This new judgement was because there was fake allegations of domestic violence done by husband and his parents just because the husband did not want to leave his parents .
2nd rule is fine but then husband should also not force wife to stay away from her parents 3rd reason if women don't want to continue pregnancy it's fine she can stop it but if wife wants a child but husband don't want a baby then also pregnancy should be stopped because it should only be when both wants a child 4th is a wife or husband already has problem if infertility then they should reveal it before marrige rather than ruining someone's life & if they hide this before marrige they should be punished
Bhai kya bol raha hai?? 🤦♀ why should pregnancy be stopped husband isn't the one carrying the baby yeah you can say legal duties shouldn't be put on husband but no one has the right over weather a wife should keep the baby or not(you should have said "men(husband)should have the right to abandon their fatherhood role if they did not the baby)
@@shahidchaudhary8223 I know its sound weird but its her body and her choice if she doesn't want a baby then ofcourse government should give the man right to file a divorce as the girl is ruining his life
@@shahidchaudhary8223 so why pregnancy should be continued if husband don't want a baby? Then there should not be any problem if he don't treats the child as his kid and he don't pay any money for that kid & that child should not get any part from his property too.... And during pregnancy also wife is given complete rest and all the work is done by husband and that time he is so mentally disturbed & don't even gets the complete sleep and faces so much stress and work load so even if wife carries a baby then husband also takes care of her and do all the work so both suffer a lot not only wife thik hai na not only wife ki woh baccha rakhti hai, husband bhi bhut kaam krta hai so tak nhi pata thik se usko bhi count kro uski body bhi thak jati hai pain krti hai itna kaam krke samjhe And agar husband wife ka khayal nhi rakhta uss time jab woh pregnant hai and ilaj ke kiye pay na kare agar and wife ke liye sara kaam na kare toh koi problem nhi honi chaiye kyuki usko woh baccha nhi chaiye toh wife ki pregnancy and uss bacche ki responsibility woh na nibhaye toh bhi koi problem nhi honi chaiye
Sure!! Just keep your demands before the marriage.. Otherwise it should be considered fraud.. The general idea is the wife goes to/with husband's house.. If you don't want that then keep the demand before marriage (the judgement said without any valid reason, so that means you didn't disclose that demand before marriage and as soon as married forcing the seperation).. As after marriage the wife gets maintenance from the husband's side + anti dowry act (which even supreme court termed as legal terrorism)
Biology jaake padho ... Constitution equality aur feminism ki baat kar sakta hai, society kar sakta hai lekin constitution aur society temporary hai .. biology permanent hai ... Aur biology me human bisexual organism hai na ki equal dono ka role alag alag hai ... Aaj nahi to kal ye feminism suddenly collapse kar jaayega .. samjhe so apne aap ko biology ke saath chalo..
@travellingprince7921 biology or parents ke saath rehne ka kya sambandh hai? Agar tum biology dekho to ladkiya zyada emotional hoti hai, parents se alag hone ka dukh obviously unhe hi zyada hoga to unhe hi alag kyu karna hai? Ladke emotionally unstable nahi hote to handle karsakte hai. (I'm don't actually believe this massive load of bullcrap just throwing your own logic (?) Back at you). Feminism to kisi ne mention hi nahi kiya.
The reason even educated women are given maintenance is because they lose a significant earning potential after pregnancy and childbirth. Employers discriminate against them because they are assumed to be primary care givers and only then a working women
Exactly! If the man was also forced by women or her parents to leave his job and not work bcz he should focus on household chores only then he should be given maintenance
@@PRIYANKAGUPTA-do9luThat's not the criteria. Whoever is earning more in the marriage usually has to pay alimony. Parents wagera is not a criteria in this. Usually men earn more so they have to pay.
Aree guys obvio... She knows the judgments aren't woke. She's just messing around with her audience to gauge their wisdom and growth of mind ❤. Also, it is a good copywriting technique for captioning shorts. It not only made us think about it but also to drop comments. And we know why all this matters 😁 Good work!
Agree with all, with exception of one where you can divorce if wife asks you to separate from His parents. What about girl’s parents. She had to leave them too.
I agree with 1st, 3rd and 4th but I cannot agree with 2nd one. A woman also has to leave her house but that does not give her right to seek divorce but if she says to her husband then he can file. I really cannot understand this.
If a husband is not agreeing to live separately then wife should not force him to live separately. If in-laws are abusive and husband still does not want to live separately, better that wife get divorced from him because he is not a good husband who can take stand for his wife.
@@mishirjii I agree with you. The decision should not be unilateral but if a woman wants that I believe the decision should be respected and not to be used against her in the court.
@@nightflame9895 don't Marry simple logic........it's your choice.....if you have a problem with being separated from your parents don't Marry or convince your partner to allow your parents to live with you he will surely agree if he is a good guy and if he is not then why are u marrying a bad guy?🗿🗿🤡
If anyone told me to leave my parents. Whether wife, gf etc I would leave them but not my parents. I will make all these things clear if not ready for divorce or do not marry me, even if I need to stay a virgin for life nothing bigger than my mom and dad.
@@loveyourself-n6yagreed and I think that is how it is, but I hope you understand difference between infertility and impotency and sexual incompatibility.
Behen , kya bol rahi ho ? India mei shaadi matlab , ladki apni ghar chodkar pati ki ghaar jati hai, leaving her parents behind. But Aajtak ek bhi aise husband nhi dekhi maine , jo yeh bolta hai , *apni family se milo hi nhi* .
2nd one is should also be implemented for women who don't want to leave their parents. 4th one also. See both of these problems have similar solutions. No question divorce. If a couple wants to get divorced they should get it irrespective of anything or any reason. See if even 1 person can't live in marriage they shouldn't stay. Forcing people together creates problems more than it already is. If people don't want to be together they shouldn't be together.This will absolutely solve all marriage related problems once n for all. No need to bring situational scenarios to justify divorce. God our courts are so slow.
Now we can say kanoon ki dheere dheere aankh thik ho rhi hai 😂
👍
😅
मगर कानून की आंख पर तो पट्टी बंदी रहती है तो आंख होकर भी मतलब क्या क्यो न पट्टी खोल कर आंखों से देखकर और न्याय प्रणाली को सुरक्षित की जा सकती वरना तो महाभारत में दुर्योधन के पिता की आंखे नही होते हुवे महाभारत बना विनाश कारी कही अपनी भी व्यवस्ता आंखे होते हुवे कवरव पिता की तरह हल करने मुश्किल लगती है अगर आंख ओ कमी में सुनने में कमी, और बताने में कमी फिर तो चलना आया तो दिव्यांग भी तो आरक्षण ले सकता कानून को भी तो 18अठारा 36% जीएसटी के बदले वापस आरक्षण मिलता होगा विशेस टिप्पणी देशीहीतमे में जनवासी के लिए है सोच बड़ी होनी चाहिए अनहोनी तो अमर है काया छोड़ने के बाद भी मोक्ष की राह जी जी जयदेशी हम और आप zee.??!
जयहिन्द वन्देमातरम.! जयमहाराष्ट्र.!💐💐💐
😂😂
😂
It is not woke judgements, it is best judgements
If it's in favour of men then it's not woke. But if it favours women and LGBT people then it's western wokeism.
Shi hai
Yes. True. She is diverting the attention from real woke judgements.
Yes, they are not woke judgements...
Fake feminists ko toh ye woke judgement hi lagega na 😂😂
1. Yes husbands should be entitled to alimony, just like wives
2. This is fair , wives should not be allowed to separate their husband from his parents. But same should apply for husbands too, and a woman should be allowed to take care of her parents as well
3. Its fair. A woman should not be forced to have children
4. Its fair, as long as wives are also debarred from seeking divorce on grounds of infertility or impotence.
None of these judgments were woke, they were all fair.
Yup. Nothing woke about them. I don’t think she understand what woke actually looks like.
3. Really?? What if husband wants a kid and her wife is not ready to have a child
@@aryanbhardwaj3843 If anything, it's the exact opposite of woke.
I agree with you on 2nd one. What about parents who just have no son and the son in laws do not accept them? The law are not thought from this perspective. Afterall patriarchy still prevails in Indai.
@@__ubednamayou can't force them to to give birth, talk it out about long trrm prospects and if things don't work out you can take a divorce
1. Correct 2.wrong because sometimes daily taunt by mother in-law is not understand by husband and patriarchal society they thinks its normal when she disrespect you in front of family or others. 3. Correct 4.correct
Yup the wife shall raise voice regarding this matter. It's a valid reason to get separated with her husband
As a woman, i approve and appreciate these laws. Men are neither inferior, nor superior....they're humans- just like us females...and they are entitled to dignity
Then why women leave parents & men dont get divorced by women if he separates that woman to leave parents after marriage....
It is still a misnomer that woman & men have equal rights....
@@knowledgeplus177well there are some bi local and ambilocal families.
and some couples make their diffrent residence from either of their parents after marriage.
+it's not that girl's cant ever visit or live at their parents after marriage you know.
+in the end ghar jamai bana hai to ladki ko itna to kamana hoga ki vo apne parents ka dhyan rakh sake🙌
@@mazakmazakmein3437 girls can visit only .... but boys are staying at theor own... so girls should stay at their own place .... & boy should sometimes visit theor parents .
@@mazakmazakmein3437 aaj kal ladki bhi kama rahi hai bahaton mein okk
@@knowledgeplus177 are Didi bola toh kuch log hote hai Ghar jamai.
Mei argument nhi Kar rha bas Bata rha hu ki ladki ladke ke Ghar rhe
Ya vice versa, vo depend karta hai families and couple pe.
Par yeh chiz ke baare Mei families aur couple baat hi nhi karte.
These are not woke judgements, they are sensible and progressive.
Mere bhai that's exactly what being woke is... Progressive and advocacy of human rights
U don't know what woke means really
@@vectorquantity2727 its because woke has lost its meaning after american woke life
@@aydev2 it's not what you say, it's what you do that defines woke.
@@plotzbitter4919 not after America but since big corporates, thinking tanks and other institutions have started using their propaganda by justifying it's woke
this is not WOKE, its basic human rights to make our society liberal and civilized
but for India it's woke judgement
Can't agree less .🤝
What if wife don't want to o have kid without a valid reason and prove it's valid i
@@hihowareufinethanku court ke upar babu bhaiya
@@abhaypatel4292 what??
2nd one then a girl also should not get separated from their parents.......
not really, think about it a whole family tree will build around the couple. seems unfair but its rational.
This happens but do you know most married women who choose or had to stay at their mother's home face cruelty by their brothers wife if they stay for a long time.
Okk then what about expenses
Men have to live with their parents because they have to support their family whereas women don't even support themselves thus they ask how much the man earns if a woman doesn't want to leave her parents then she should marry a man who earns less than them.
@@313_Sherry I don't know where you live but at my house at least both my sister and I are expected to work and take care of our parents even after marriage
One judgement should be allowing a women to live with her parents after marriage atleast if parents have no other caregiver children. Every human gets old and deserve care, no matter whether they give birth to a boy or girl
Exactly
Ispe koi baat hi nhi kr rha hai
Fabulous point you have highlighted
toh shadi hi mat karo phir best option hai
Same thing i feel...if patents have only girls,what about them?
Husband's parents have right to live with son but what about girls parents? They will quickly give sake of society norms...
They are allowed to I believe, if your husband dosent allow that you divorce him, simple(joke)
यह judgement woke नहीं बल्कि reasonable और sensible है
Better to be Woke than being a Dork
Not the 4th one .. I completely disagree with the 4th judgement .. human(man or women) should be given rights to come out of a marriage if their partner is infertile. I would not. But I would be grumpy till the end of life and that’s not healthy ..
@@sudeeptaghosh surrogacy se paida karo
@@dangergamimg1933it's already a ground for divorce.
True
Ek aur law aana chahiye regarding the infertility...
If a man is incapable then also divorce can't be claimed
😂
@@alankritamukherjee3532 isme hasne ki kya baat hai hutiye?
@@superiorsimp4210 bich wala hoga maybe... isliye
Or husband ko bhi pesa milna chahiye 😂😂
@@superiorsimp4210 shayad hook up culture or one night stand wali woke female hai
Separating men from their parents is cruelty, but separating women under the banner of marriage is just ok 👍
Fr
True
behn ye har baat ko gender pe hi kyu le jaati ho, thoda socha bhi karo. ye law na hi men ke liye hai na hi women ke liye ye to un maa baak ke adhikar surakshit rakhne ke liye banaya gya. jara socho jis tarah ek patni apne sas sasur ko chhodne ke liye kehti hai aur tumhare hisab se chhod dena chahiye to fir behn tumhare bhi maa baap hai unko kaun dekhega??
@@ashutoshyadav8692 woh kya bolna chahti hai tumko samajh nahi aaya
@@OogaBoogaBoogaOoga1 kya kehna chahti hai tum bata do?
In favour of the judgements 👏🏻. 2nd and 4th law should go both ways. A husband shouldn't force his wife to look after his parents if she doesn't want to and keep her away from her parents. A wife shouldn't demand divorce on the grounds of husband's infertility too.
3rd one as well
@@_YashSawant 💀
If u ask for iy court will do ig as well
@@_YashSawant😅 what?
Tum marraige say pehlay bol dena yeh Saab apney Husband ko,agar tumhara terms & conditions accept karney k baad wo mukar jaye toh lelo divorce. 😊
it's not WOKE, it's REASONABLE and SENSIBLE
One, if Husband can claim divorce just because the wife doesn’t want to be with his parents, how come the wife is expected to leave her parents and come and live with her in laws. Isn’t that cruel as well. Two, Claiming divorce because your partner is infertile should be completely up to an individual’s personal choice, some men might want to be a father, why force him to stay in a marriage, when he clearly doesn’t want to. What kind of ridiculousness is this?
@@shahzaman365 I agree with your second point brother. But in the first case, this is the norm. And just look at which court gave this judgement. It's Kolkata HC. WB is a maternalist society. Things like these happen in WB
@@shaswatchatterjee3395 Justifying oppression in the name of norm is not okay. No one should be forced to live and be in a arrangement they don’t want to. If husband can expect his wife to live with his parents, the wife should also have the right. I am saying that, being a Bangladeshi man. I used look up to India as a country, growing up in a family that had a very deep hatred for Pakistan because of 1971 and love for India due to the same reason, for me India was a progressive secular nation, but now day by day it’s getting more and more regressive. It saddens my heart to witness the direction this nation, my neighbours are heading towards. And it’s coming from a place of love and concern, nothing else.
@@shahzaman365 Glad to hear about your love for India brother. But changing of house and surname has been continuing since ages. No matter the religion or the region, this culture remains the same. Even in a maternalist society like WB, this happens too. And I don't think women have a problem with this. Because even they know that it is what it is. Ofcourse initially there might be problems in adjustments, but the society and the world at large have been accustomed with this custom
@@shahzaman365 And this has been followed for long. Why change it, now?
1. Equal rights. Very sound judgement
2. Fair, but similar laws should be made for women as well.
3. Best judgement. Women should have rights to bodily anatomy.
4. Good. Genetilia size or infertility should not be a ground for divorce
2. It's Father's child also. Father cannot have any say?
Well the father is not the one who's gonna suffer for 9 months, is he? The mood swings, cravings, hormonal changes and (usually) morning sickness takes a huge toll on both body and mind. Not everyone woman wants to go through that. It's a conversation that needs to be held before marriage.
@@krutikavaidya6977 it's 3am. What's wrong
@@ujwalmokashi6702 tere jaise nalle ping karke pareshaan kar raha hoga 3 baje tak
Yes and child custody should be for mother only @@krutikavaidya6977
Even women should not be forced to leave their parents home😤
Every woman must not automatically be entitled to alimony
@desi_hamster bro better use protection 🙂
@desi_hamster you should find a wife that's willing and consenting to that too. though im sure you won't be able to find one😂
Pati se zyada kamao fir ussey ghar le ke jao
@@lightchamber2186 dono eksath alag rahe aur waqt aane pr parents ko apne sath rakh sakte he ..jab wo budhe honge
These are not WOKE... but most sensible judgements out there. Kudos 👏👏
1,2,4 judgement sahi hai 3rd judgement bilkul bhi sahi nhi hai...
Bacche lene par husband aur wife dono ka equal sahemati hona chahie khali wife ka nhi..
Humare indian culture me saadi koi long time sexsual agreement ki tara dekha nhi jata...
Ase to wife badla lene ke liye aapne pati par ghar wale par case daal sakta hai..
@@disco688 apne ekdam sahi kaha sir 🗿🙂☺🤝🏻
@@godofwrathyt7687 4rth is also wrong meansa that husband will live childless ... fertility should be checked both the side before
@@poojaboutique9147 yes indeed 🤝🏻
Toh sambhal jao abb seh.. Patni kah mood karab nahi hona chahiye warna tumara Anne wala generation nahi hoga abb uske
Who said this is woke at first place ? These are sensible orders.
Except one all are sensible I mean men asking women for maintaining 😂😂😂
Pregnancy should be a choice, for atleast few years.. like.. 4 to 5 years..
Continuously Denying pregnacy should be held under cruelty...
Woman cannot just marry a man for what a man provides (as happens generally)
@@aniketsrivastava1870 what's wrong with that if women can claim maintenance why not men?🤔🤔
@@karthikkulkarni5722 cause it's the duty of man to provide not take
absolutely😊
1 - fair enough whoever earns more should pay
2 - couples live separately unless anyone's parents need constant care(personal opinion)
3 - discuss kids before marriage(parents should not be involved in this discussion)
4 - infertility is nobody's fault
In 2nd I think It is valid for divorce
Like if it is forcefull then shouldn't be allowed but why can't we make it gender neutral
if the women is infertile then she should tell the man(before marriage) or surrogacy should be allowed to the coupes/ husbands
@@AllAboutEverything-ge4ph sometimes people dont know it before they try to conceive. Also, men can be infertile too
@@Zero_crumbs_left_0_1"dont know it before they try to conceive" idk about this and yes men should also tell the woman
This is exactly why these are anti men laws. Infertile wife is no ground for divorce but infertile husband is. And also if you dont want to have children then why should someone marry you?!
I loved how both MEN as well as WOMEN are getting importance now. That's what we actually call ✨GENDER EQUALITY✨
@@7ManishRairip English and gender equality pe hass kar cool lgne ka try kr rhe ho agar itna hi gender equality pe ab hasna aa rha h to "why purush Pradhan samaj" vo to itne saalo se hota aa rha h women ko oppressed kiya jaa rha tha tab nhi gender equality yaad aai kisi ko
@@7ManishRaifax
Nice joke
Agar app female h one heads off to you queen
@@Tripathi991 han ek jese eradicate women reservation
Free bus service in Delhi and Karnataka
Also equalise registeration fees men(6%) and women(4%)
And maintenance
Dower in muslim
Ammend article 16 ,17
Right?
Tub equality gae gutter me
Ek aur law aana chahiye 25 turn hote hi parents can't force their children to marry 😂
parents vo bhi hmare liye hi boolte hai
@@moviesfarm jaise ki jaldi shaadi karke har kisi ka bala hua hai na
@@flynndias7081 35 me shaadi karo, 37 tak bachha aayega jab vo 30 saal ka hogaa tum 67 ke ho jaaoge, meri family ka logic 🙂
Aisa rule h shayad
bhai agar bachha kama raha hai tab to theek hai nahi to koi kutta bhi nhi puchega berozgaar ko shaadi to dur ki baat hai😂
Completely agree with judgement. It is necessary for being a developed society and country.
Indeed I totally agree with the court, husband or Wife cannot force their partner to stay away from their parents. And if I do that my wife has every right to divorce me. Imagine how you will feel if someone does the same.
@@codejunkes4607 there is no such law. That law applies only upon men
@@codejunkes4607 I can't understand what u r trying to justify. Can you please simplify it?
Western country rule aa gya
pehle economy develop karo
Your vocabulary is really good 💯
If this is wokeism,then the whole world need to be woke
Yes
No
This isn't woke, idk why she's calling it woke
@@arijit1809 I dont know why you are taking 'woke' as something bad
@@rationalist455 because wokeism is nowadays used by more pseudo liberals and pseudo feminists to prove irrelevant points. It has lost its cause.
These four judgements are real examples of gender equality
How the 2nd one?
If a man can force the girl to stay away from parents, why can't the girl?
@@bansaltalks4589 wo koy force nehe h or ha jo tum western culture ke bat karte ho waha pe bhe ese hota h koy new nehe h
@@bansaltalks4589 pati kon sa hamesha apne ma bap ke pas rehta h
@@bansaltalks4589 jo husband kamata h vo to bahar he rahta h
@@bansaltalks4589 ladkiya apne gar ke liye pariye hote h usko Jana he hota h chae ro ke ya has ke
Tabhe to unhe ma to bada darza Diya jata h society me ek Bahu ko jada samman Diya Jata h uske husband se 😊
It is called common sense. Second law should be that wife can not stop husband from visiting his parents and paying them support from his salary.
For comments, I would clarify few things.
1. I have no problem if a girl is supporting her parents from her own salary after contributing her share to household expenses, even during marriage. As long as she is not being exploited by her siblings to take care of her parents. Please focus on the term exploited.
2. I am barely telling a common thought, it is not a paramount truth. For example, wife also has the right to stop her husband from being exploited by his siblings or parents. Every situation demands different solution.
3. When I say financially support, I mean basic financial support divided between siblings based on their disposal income.
4. I said visiting his parents. I am already assuming they live separately. Please stop commenting about elderly tradition of pressuring daughter in law.
Yup
True
Then even wives should get to choose to live with her parents along with her husband😊
@@Academia_astheticShe can choose but can't force 😅
@@insh_ true, but the society will never support it :(
3rd was very much needed thanks🙏
These are not woke , these are sensible and should be normal for everyone , the last one seems a little bit grey if one of them is capable and other one is not.
i think she said woke in sarcastic way.
Then you should check before marriage
I think isi cheez ko toh woke keht hai
@@Comicscene.7289 I'm saying if anyone hide infertility before marriage
@@shayanraj7840 test before marriage is very important, 🙂
4th judgement is seriously needed in this society!
for men????
1st one also
The 4th one is the reason for Western culture being followed in India. We didn't know when modernization became westernization. Women and men marrying in 30s many suffering P.C.O.D due to hormonal imbalance. Men don't have good sperm count and so on😢
What about guys who want to be a parent 😢
@@onkarrera3141 I think IVF or surrogacy is an option it is that important. And think if the male if impotent then should the female give divorce too?
That's not woke.
That's equality
Where's the equality in 2nd one?
Where is equality in 3rd one
@@Uchiha_Madara64 so , men would give birth then ? I can't find any points about equality in 3rd statement
@@debasishsadhu2333 so women would make sperms .
So women would share half of their property after divorce.
So if men don't want to provide for child then you can't force them .
You can't find because you are simp son .
@@amritasahu2023Quote "Without any valid reason"
4th one should have been like it the wife was infertile before the marriage and she hid the fact from her husband even after marriage then husband can file divorce but if husband knew about wife infertility and despite that they still both agreed to marry then husband can't file for divorce one sidedly.
Second one is unfair until the same rules get applied to men
You cannot force women away from their parents in the name of culture. Both male and female counterpart is capable of taking care of their parents...so either both take that responsibility or you cannot hold anyone of them accountable
So how would they stay together if both want to stay with their parents
@@rehanakhtar6896 Just get a bigger house
I also feel the same
100% agreed.
@@rehanakhtar6896 that's their personal issue
One law from my side
No one I mean no one can force a woman to leave her house or her parents when he can live with his parents or family
Parents can disown after a legal age. It's their right
I was just searching for this
Who did force one to leave their house...? Before marriage you already know about these terms you are all free to say no or put forwardyour terms of marriage...if they are okay with it..then all good.
@@abhish3k115 No first tell me why is this stereotype is made and if a woman can leave her house in which she have lived almost her whole life, then why a man can't do this. When for his love she can sacrifice her life with her parents then why a man can't do this
@@jahnavi1607 man also do that even parents allow them like my maternal uncle allow his wife to stay at her father's house bcz her mother is no more and her father is specially able and she is the only child at house ....but the court here is saying about one can't force other to leave their parents...just like man can ask his wife to have baby but he can't force pregnancy on her...
Edit: I respect women for all the sacrifices they make throughout their life, same goes with man..
4th one
Instead of stating "wife" court should've said divorce cannot be claimed if any of the two is infertile.
Actually yeh cheez bahut Kam hoti hai ki if male is infertile then the girl seperates, India mein even baccha na paida hone ka Karan majorly blame female ls pe dala jata h, even if the male is infertile. But yes l agree with your statement too, but jyada common males ka divorce Dena hota hai apni wives ko child n hone ke liye
If anyone gay or lesbie, and the male or female counterparts would not be able to get biological offspring of his/her own, then that should and must be a ground for separation or divorce, whatever for that matter if the spouse doesn't want continuation in that husband-wife relationship.
@@sandeepanayak1479 I dont totally disagree with your point.
Definitely a male or a female has the right to have their biological offspring and if a male or a female do not want to continue their life with an infertile partner then they should be allowed to file a divorce.
@@himanshichaudhary9404 I don't agree with the point ki females ke sath esa zyada hota hai.
Most common reasons for divorce in modern society is not infertility or something serious but it is the inability to adapt the situations that the couple has created for themselves by getting into a marriage.
@@jaishriram1069 i disagree.
Meri gali maine 2 case dekh liye Bhai.
Ladki bcha paida nahi kar skti, so the husbands want to separate from their wives 2 salo ka pyar phur gya
Pr i have never seen a woman seeking divorce just bcz he is infertile (in real life aise cases bhot rare Milenge)
To thoda data bhi padh lo.. opinion dene se pahle
Bilkul Sahi decisions hai
Badlav ho raha hai👍👍
These are the most sensible and practical judgements I have seen in a while..
Yes, But Hindus should also be allowed for Bigamy. On the condition that he treat his wives equally.
@@yankeeboy5748 wife should alsi be allowed bigamy, on the condition she will treat both the husbands equally
@@bheeshmmanisharma7799 😂😂😂👍👍perfect
Adultery par chutiya kaata hai sabka
Indeed I totally agree with the court, husband or Wife cannot force their partner to stay away from their parents. And if I do that my wife has every right to divorce me. Imagine how you will feel if someone does the same.
How normalized it is that "husband has right to divorce if wife froces him to stay away from parents " does not apply to vice versa conditions...
Because in our society parents don't usually depend on daughters for maintenance.
@@realscrewdriver8102 but you agree with the 1st judgment huh?
@@sukritidash9358 yes ofcourse. You think its wrong? I'd also like to understand why some women think the 2nd judgement is hypocritical.
@@sukritidash9358 kitne percent women contribute karti ha alimony???its mostly men who pays alimony and child support
@@realscrewdriver8102 ladko ke sath cruelty aur ladkiyo ke sath parampara!
If a women is the only child of the parents she cannot be forced to leave to her husband's house after marriage because like a responsible male child she is also to take care of her parents
yes that is why the court allowed a 'f*** it, I quit' button to exist
Most of The Times She Does Support Them Even Husband Also If Parents Financial Conditions Are Not Good
@prashantgurung2635 yes but there is a difference between just supporting and staying with them, just financial support is not enough
so, i think she should not mary to any one. if marry than ask before marriage
okay. 🤡
Second one is not woke at all. It should be mutual. Husband can also not tell wife to leave her parents. If wife is leaving parents and husband should be too. Else wife should be allowed to live with her parents.
This is called equality💓❤️, agree with all decisions!!
2nd one should go both ways too. A girl should not get separated from her parents either.
That’s already a part of domestic violence law
Can you see how illogical that statement is? If nobody is getting separated from their parents then they can't be together
No-one forces. The girl can demand a guy like ki and ka's Arjun Kapoor.
It's their priority.
The only thing there is important which is transparency should be from the beginning and the demand must not come after the wedding.
@@anamakaveekshakathen can you give a solution ??
@@StutyYadavyes , both boys and girls parents should live together as one big happy family, that's what I'm planning to do as an Indian.
Your all article & right always right 😄
Now we need some judgement against fake cases on men by women
Better to be Woke than being Dork
Recently MP (Ashok Nagar) court gave 10 yrs imprisonment to a woman for fake gang r... Case
Really needed as many girls are taking the wrong advantage of the privilege they are getting
Absolutely correct we need more transparency in the suits
Sahi kaha bro ye aajkl bhut hogiya ladies jhuta case kardeti hai or ladies hone ka fayda utha ti hai is par bhi kanoon ko aankh kholni chahiye
I think second judgement should go both ways and hope that fourth judgement will not put infertile woman in danger
Exactly
Why shouldn't lol?
Yeah....but hardly any woman wants to marry an unemployed man....lol
If a woman can marry an unemployed man without disrespecting him n laws guarantee that she will have to take monetary responsibility of the man so a man will never force her to get separated from her parents.
Nah it's alright
Imagine the woman covering the fact that she is infertile and yet married, now you can’t divorce her. 🤯
Now that's how courts should give judgements👏
Chal Bey Chutiya Aurat... Last Wala Ek Dum Galat Hai, Tum Agar Baanjh Ho Toh Kya Tumhara Pati Napunsak Ban Ke Mar Jaaye ? Bhale Hi Tumhe Divorce Dena Sahi Nahin Hoga Par Uss Ko Pura Haq Hai Dusri Shaadi Kar Ke Bachche Ka Baap Banne Ka
mam apki vedio bhut achi hai
however pls app judgment ka title bhi bataya karo pls
Ye sari judgements reasonable nd logical h ….😊😊
😂
Hey 👋
How is it sensible when women are forced to live with their in laws while there is no such law for men?
@@nightflame9895 Nah u misinterpreted that law ..vo ye khna chahte h ki agr koi wife apne in laws ko preshan krke unhe beghr krna chahe to divorce file ho skta h husband ki side se …See kuch wives hoti h aisi I hv seen isliye mrko ye sensible lga …Or bat rhi apne in laws se alg rhne ki to vo baat alg h and choice h ..😊 I agree that force ni krna chye sath rhne ko
@@nightflame9895 , ek kaam kar lena tum, shaadi mat karna ghar baithe rehna kabhi ghar nhi chorna padega tab tumhe
We proud of our Calcutta high court judge " Abhijit Ganguli " 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 He is a real hero .
Yes. Only Kolkata High Court judgement is wise.
Absolutely!
Indeed❤️ he's my uncle
@@pratyashagangu oooo and our hero 😊
What about separating wife from her parents
The judgements : 🗿
Bhai woke ka matlab modern hota hai sahi to bola usne ...traditional nahi woke laws hai ye
@@TheeeAPok bro I thought woke means bad or overrated
@@SoumyajitDey-The_RealChad.I understand this negative connotation of the word "woke" is due to the westerners making it seem bad. Their woke people are blasphemous and distorting the meaning of the word for everyone
Expect 4th
Except the 2nd
Very good judgment. And Priti you are doing an excellent job. Keep it up. We are truly enjoying your videos. Bravo n God bless you.
What if maintenance claim will only be allowed for the one who is going to keep and care child and if their is no child than the one who is rich enough will have to give maintenance to the other one but only if he/she is not able to work or not educated enough for work (only have to give maintenance for their education period) and this period will be decided by court and if other one did not follow and start study or work he/she will lose their maintenance claim
2nd law is perfect. But same should be applied to wives too.
1st, 3rd, and 4th are true examples of gender equality
Many husbands try to break the tie b/w his wife and her family So I think for the 2nd one they could have added "vice versa".
I too agree ...... Women's parents are also victims.... Men's family forces women not to visit their homes....
@@rakhi167 EXACTLY!!......that's what happens with my mother 🙂
Husbands should be entitled to alimony on divorce provided they were forced to sacrifice their career due to marriage.
@@laalaalaalaa29yup
Saying No one forced girls to leave their parents is like saying no one no one forced men to be the sole breadwinners of the family.
no relation.
So true !
Agree
@@aayushgupta8608go study relations
The only one that forces you are yours parents , ab voh nahi rakhna cha rahe toh koi kya kare
For the people confused because of the word "woke", woke actually means progressive by definition. It is a negative word only in pop culture slang.
Lol go woke go broke
@@gtrmcs you still haven't understood the true meaning of woke go and study some vocabulary
It doesn't just mean 'progressive' cause if it would have been, that would not have been a slang but a synonym for the word progressive. Woke nowadays is used to describe people who are overly progressive with extreme leftist ideologies.
@@RimaDesu00it seems like you didn't get his sarcasm but ig it's fine.
Aur bhai sabse badi baat to ye ki 'woke' sirf past tense hai 'wake' word ka. And if an year ago even if it meant being 'progressive', now it's mostly negatively used. So the video didn't age well cause i(and definitely a lot of viewers) would literally be confused whether she is praising the decisions or being sarcastic.
Apki voice bohot pyari hai diii❤
2nd law seems so unfair. because there is no law that prevents husbands from stopping his wife from looking after her parents. there are so many husbands who forcefully stop their wives from financially supporting her parents and family members. 2nd law shouldgo both ways
True. Girls are supposed to spend money only for that family and kids. Not her parents. And if I stay there for his parents for 24 hours, then who will stay at my parental home to take care of my parents? I am a victim of this and filed divorce
@@moulichanda5278 I think you did good. Care goes both ways.
@@moulichanda5278 yes that's why marry a person from your neighbourhood otherwise it will not be easy to manage as you think so
@@moulichanda5278don't marry
1 and 3 are best decisions.. 2nd depends on the kind of parents because girl also leaves home
They said reason should be valid
Hmm
@@blaze635 so what's valid reason for girl to leave her home
@@vikrantpawar exactly
@@vikrantpawar no reason..it's a tradition..
Second rule should also be like husband also can't force wife to stay away from her parents. Also first one should have done sooner
How is this possible? A girl has to leave her parents' house after marriage, it's the tradition of every marriage in the world. So your point is irrelevant.
Wrong
@@sovanmohanty49it's not necessary in eastern part of India reverse culture follows
@@sovanmohanty49 actually I think it's more like the husband can't force his wife to not go to her own maikey.
Well Ambani ya adani jaisa baap ho agar uska toh....@@sovanmohanty49
the 3rd one must have specific conditons. Since both a male and female contribute to the formation of the fetus, the woman cannot take sole responsibility for the termination. Also if the inlaws r pressuring her for a child and she doesnt want to get pregnant then it becomes a choice solely for the woman
The 4th one also reserves a condition. If the woman never revailed that she was infertile before marriage then it might be a case of cheating the husband.
Definitely husband's should get the right for maintenance sometimes wife's earn good and gain positions and abandon their husbands like a tarsh.
The second one
Then who made the law that it is must for a girl to leave her parents house ,with whom she lived for 25 to 30 years
Sometime it really becomes difficult for women due to several reasons to mingle with her in laws .
* But one should never leave old and needy parents on themselves.
Exactly
Sahi baat hai mat chhodo apne apne Ghar walo ko and alag alag raho 😂😂😂 Shadi k maayne hi badal do 😅
@@ThankYouGoogle4 yes. There should be a choice on either end and not mandate on one side.
@@ThankYouGoogle4 women will better understand this ,that to present day women born in 90 s who have built a bit difference.
Time k saath saath paramparae change hoti hi hain yahi achhi baat bhi hai.
@@As-vh8mo well only some tradition change bit all and I agree with you that women should have a choice in paleolithic era like most mammals males have to leave their group and join another to prevent inbreeding but in our ancestors females leave their groups and this tradition continues to us. Even today you can see male lions and primates leaving their family once they matured
If separating man from his parents can be a divorce ground, it has to be applied in case man ask woman to separate from her parents too!!
No, not at all. Marriage rule is when a girl gets married, she has to leave her parents house and make her husband's family, hers own family. It is not vice versa. Today, girls and girls families try to change the real tradition of marriage, that is why most of the marriages are falling apart. Ulti Ganga bahane ki koshish naa Karo. Itna bhi equality sahi nahi hai.. Agar sahi hota to prakriti mard ko bhi bachcha janam Dene aur doodh pilane ki capability deta. Har cheez mein equal nature ne hi nahi banaya hai to kyun itna equal home ke liye chaati pitna?
@@ceatlove who want to tolarate a headache aka in-laws after marriage with a mamma's boy 🍼...
XD. try roaming streets of Delhi at night without that mamma's boy@@Yan-Yin_11111
The time you are talking about that time people used to have 5-10 children. Nowadays we are mostly single child or two sisters. Everything changes dear. You cannot do monarchy in the name of culture.
So clear these things before marriage,If you don't want to seperate with your parents and she clearly mentioned wife not Pheonce and in India I think all girls are well aware before their marriage that they had to seperate from their Parents so girl should demand or otherwise don't get married
More 2 rules should be added..Firstly parents can't force their children to marry... Secondly waise husband ya in laws Jo larkio ko apne mmy papa ka dekhbhal nahi karne dete h... wo v divorce seek Kar pae....
Wtf is larki? It's ladki
@@anchzerorye totli hai
The first one is already illegal. Forced marriages are not allowed
@@anchzeror samajh to aya na? Bs chill
@@anchzerorbro hasn't discovered urdu yet
Pregnancy ka faisala dono ka hona chahiye. Sirf ladki k chahane ya na chahane se faisala Lena thik nhi...
I totally agree with all these 4. Totally logical and favourable.
1,2,4 sahi hai 3rd judgememt sahi nhi hai
bacche lene par husband aur wife dono ka decision jaroori hai.. sirf wife ka nhi
Humare culture me saadi koi deal nhi hai..
Agr baccha nhi lena hai to saadi maat karo...
@@disco688 wahi to... username katwo ke liye hai kya
@@disco688 kyon shadi sirf bache paida karne ke liye ki jaati hai kya😂
@@SimranSimmi-ry8cm saadi ek sansar banane ke liye kiya jata hai... srirti, society ko sustain karne ke liye..
Isliye bacche bhi ahem hai.
Tum west ki paidaish saadi ko long time sexsual agreement dekhte ho usme mein kuch nhi kar sakta.. aab habas me dube hue log kaise samjhenge.
@@disco688 I mean still it's her body, lots of women's are forced to get pregnant because of her In -laws or parents. I think giving birth should be both husband and wifes decision. But women shouldn't have to be forced in it . She is the onee who gonna take all the pain and carry child for 9 month, so I think she can make the decision
Girl have to leave her house her parents her career that should be also considered as cruelty.
They why is she marrying him dont marry
@@Shubham-wl7irmarrying doesn't mean you have the obligation to serve your in-laws...a husband marries a wife but a wife marries the whole family...why???
@@Shubham-wl7ir then why is the he marrying her if he can't leave without his parents?????
Stay at your home then😂
@@Shubham-wl7irmaa baap k seva k liye nurse rakho q k ladka sasural ka dekhval nhi krta or pehli baat saadi pati Patni k bich hoti h or family bnane k liye future k liye Kia jata hai naa ki Patni or ladke or ladke k khandan k saath taaki puri life free ka nurse or maid mil sake
4th point could have been more sensible if it accounted for male infertility as well 🙏
But rarely women seek divorce if the husband is infertile.
Thus this judgement is for women.
@@gyaanoledge2906🙄 regardless it's happen more or not it should be gender neutral
Beautiful citations,,,,,,,,❤ thankyou,,,,,,
Honestly, if a man refuses to stay married to you, because you're infertile... it's better to get a divorce, because having kids is a big part of marriage, but it is also not JUST about kids. He probably doesn't love you, he just loves the idea of having kids, which he probably won't take care of. Also the first case about husband getting maintenance is absolutely right.
Ikr
On these grounds one should never divorce his/her partner.
After UCC ,fourth point will give population control in the country😂😂
Exactly 😂
Population control is joke. No population bill ever was successful,it's rather stupid. Also after 2045 brith rates will go down in india.
I agree with all the judgments. Both wife and husband needs to be taught a lesson in humility....
Can you please tell us the cases names..?
Aadhi problems toh shaadi se phele hi communicate karke khatam ki ja sakti hai.
Kon kamayega, kon ghar pe rahega, ya phir dono working honge.
Akele rahenge ya dono mai se kisi ek ke parivar ke saath.
Bacha chahiye ki nahi.
"Mujhe ____ (insert health problems) hai, tum batao tumhe konsi dikkate hai"
All it takes a discussion taki aage jake future mai problem na ho its that simple...
In many cases people cheat.the in laws would make an excuse of check up and never go back.
Bro shadi say pheley sab ha mai ha milatey hai bad mai apna asli rang dikhatey hai
@@manalid9908 ye
@@midnightrain3567 Tbh isilye love marriage have a lil better scope, when u know the person for more than 2-3 years tab sab malum rheta hai cuz ek insaan 3-4 mahino mai comfortable ho jata hai and apne asli rang dhika deta hai. Tab bhi uske saath relation acha chal raha then go for marriage TwT
Har cheez ka solution toh love marriage nahi ho sakta hai na bhai.
If a girl is found to have used dowry harassment and domestic violence to harass or extort money from the man after divorce, but all allegations are found to be false she should be tried and jailed
As a girl, this should be 100% law for real.
100% in favour,yep
This is incredibly stupid, this won't work for the same reason you don't get jailed for theft , rape ,etc allegations.If people are afraid that they will be jailed for alleging then they will be reluctant to take action. If your partner is rich, powerfull, has connections or there is lack of evidence then not only will the accused not be given justice(thanks to wonderfull Indian police and judiciary) but will also face trial and could get punished themselves.
It should be responsibility of society to not judge someone because of unproved allegations , not law
@@NIceGAl-sr5fjhuge difference between unproved and false
@@NIceGAl-sr5fj This is not rape, theft it’s dowry and people like record this in marriage video or when you are buying stuff you will get bills its very easy to prove. If you can’t either you are brain dead or faking
Wife also should be allowed to stay with her parents !! If her husband forces her to leave her parents' house , she also should be able to claim divorce...
That already exists
Then how would there be a family stupid girl
The husband of a wife not force her to leave har parents , rather than girls are selfish and willing to leave her parent . And her parents had make her out from their family and home .
It not what I says , it what reality says
.
So, nothing wrong is there in the system .
And our I ndan constitution had already given 14 right in favor of girls and 0 in favor of boys .
So the Judiciary had make justice .
Now , in the present situation boys are the silent suffers of domestic violence.
So, it is essential that the court make some laws in favor and for the protection of boys .
That's all thank you .
Jai Hind .Jai Bharat
@@TarunjitSarkar-pv6omkonse khet ke chutiya ho yaar. Agar English nahi aati to hindi me hi baat karlo koo rok tok nahi hai. Ladkiyo ko extra rights mile hai kyuki unhe need hai. Ladko ke rapes itne nahi hote jitne ladkiyo ke hote hai. Koi ladka raat me bahar nikal jae to baare me koi afwahe nahi phelti jese ladkiyo ke saath hota hai. Offices me boss log ladko ka sexually faida nahi uthate jese ladkiyo ka uthate hai. Aate jaate raasto me koi ladko ko catcall or peecha karke unsafe feel nahi karata. Ladko ko har jagah jaane ki azaadi hoti hai ladkiyo ko gharo me band rakha jata hai. Is sab se ladke kese suffer kar rahe hai? Kya domestic violence? Agar ladkiyo ko thode rights milgae to esa kya attyachaar hogaya? Har ladki fake rape case file nahi karati lekin har ladki ke saath ek na ek sexual assault waali ghatna hui hai.
Good to hear about the laws. It giving sounds like everyone is equal in the eye of law.
Male apne favour wale judgment ko leke khush hai aur female apne favour wale ke liye.. pr koi ek dusre ke support mei nhi h .😂😂 Insensitive hote ja raha hai insaan.. yhi h aaj ki sachchai sab khud ke liye sochte hai ..
Men becoming feminist and females don't give a &it
if a women does not want to let her husband to be with his parents and if it is wrong ... Then how a man expect that women have to leave her parents after marriage why it is not wrong because women also love their parents as man do .....🤐
Exactly!
Yes. Agreed
Women can also choose to go to Her husband's house but because of society mentality woman often choose to go . This new judgement was because there was fake allegations of domestic violence done by husband and his parents just because the husband did not want to leave his parents .
Yes....❤
True...
2nd rule is fine but then husband should also not force wife to stay away from her parents
3rd reason if women don't want to continue pregnancy it's fine she can stop it but if wife wants a child but husband don't want a baby then also pregnancy should be stopped because it should only be when both wants a child
4th is a wife or husband already has problem if infertility then they should reveal it before marrige rather than ruining someone's life & if they hide this before marrige they should be punished
I completely agree
Bhai kya bol raha hai?? 🤦♀ why should pregnancy be stopped husband isn't the one carrying the baby yeah you can say legal duties shouldn't be put on husband but no one has the right over weather a wife should keep the baby or not(you should have said "men(husband)should have the right to abandon their fatherhood role if they did not the baby)
@@shahidchaudhary8223 I know its sound weird but its her body and her choice if she doesn't want a baby then ofcourse government should give the man right to file a divorce as the girl is ruining his life
@@shahidchaudhary8223 so why pregnancy should be continued if husband don't want a baby?
Then there should not be any problem if he don't treats the child as his kid and he don't pay any money for that kid & that child should not get any part from his property too....
And during pregnancy also wife is given complete rest and all the work is done by husband and that time he is so mentally disturbed & don't even gets the complete sleep and faces so much stress and work load so even if wife carries a baby then husband also takes care of her and do all the work so both suffer a lot not only wife thik hai na not only wife ki woh baccha rakhti hai, husband bhi bhut kaam krta hai so tak nhi pata thik se usko bhi count kro uski body bhi thak jati hai pain krti hai itna kaam krke samjhe
And agar husband wife ka khayal nhi rakhta uss time jab woh pregnant hai and ilaj ke kiye pay na kare agar and wife ke liye sara kaam na kare toh koi problem nhi honi chaiye kyuki usko woh baccha nhi chaiye toh wife ki pregnancy and uss bacche ki responsibility woh na nibhaye toh bhi koi problem nhi honi chaiye
Sure!! Just keep your demands before the marriage.. Otherwise it should be considered fraud..
The general idea is the wife goes to/with husband's house.. If you don't want that then keep the demand before marriage (the judgement said without any valid reason, so that means you didn't disclose that demand before marriage and as soon as married forcing the seperation).. As after marriage the wife gets maintenance from the husband's side + anti dowry act (which even supreme court termed as legal terrorism)
Not just woked it should be implemented and followed by everyone.❤
2 rule Dono k liye hona chahiye. Ladki bi apne parents ko sath rak ske after marriage. Like Jaya kishori's demand.
Biology jaake padho ... Constitution equality aur feminism ki baat kar sakta hai, society kar sakta hai lekin constitution aur society temporary hai .. biology permanent hai ... Aur biology me human bisexual organism hai na ki equal dono ka role alag alag hai ... Aaj nahi to kal ye feminism suddenly collapse kar jaayega .. samjhe so apne aap ko biology ke saath chalo..
Parents khud hi ladki ko alag karte hain shaadi karwake
@travellingprince7921 biology or parents ke saath rehne ka kya sambandh hai? Agar tum biology dekho to ladkiya zyada emotional hoti hai, parents se alag hone ka dukh obviously unhe hi zyada hoga to unhe hi alag kyu karna hai? Ladke emotionally unstable nahi hote to handle karsakte hai. (I'm don't actually believe this massive load of bullcrap just throwing your own logic (?) Back at you). Feminism to kisi ne mention hi nahi kiya.
@@moonchild6303 Aa gye randi rona rone
@@moonchild6303 ye dunia ka har organism karta hai female parts male ke saath jaati hai , pura human evolution hi isi cheej be based hai
All 4 of them are right ✅
The reason even educated women are given maintenance is because they lose a significant earning potential after pregnancy and childbirth. Employers discriminate against them because they are assumed to be primary care givers and only then a working women
Nope it's often used by bad women to trouble their husband
It is not a courts job to judge based on what society thinks but what's fair.
They are also given maintenance if they don't have a child
How will you defend this
Exactly! If the man was also forced by women or her parents to leave his job and not work bcz he should focus on household chores only then he should be given maintenance
@@PRIYANKAGUPTA-do9luThat's not the criteria. Whoever is earning more in the marriage usually has to pay alimony. Parents wagera is not a criteria in this. Usually men earn more so they have to pay.
Finally, blind judges opened their eyes and said "Man exists too"
Aree guys obvio... She knows the judgments aren't woke. She's just messing around with her audience to gauge their wisdom and growth of mind ❤. Also, it is a good copywriting technique for captioning shorts. It not only made us think about it but also to drop comments. And we know why all this matters 😁 Good work!
Acha that's why she's saying the word "WOKE" louder everytime
Haan 😁😁😁
oh, ye content creators to audience ki psychology ke saath khel rhe hain
@@ChandravijayAgrawal Tu bhi khel
Then all women should sue all men for bringing them in sasural 😂😂😂
Sue krne ki kya jarurat hum log tou ready baithe hai gharjamai banne ko koi ladkiya approach tou kre 😂🤣
@@abhishekdixit7947 ye to mai bhi cahta hoo thak gya ho 9-5 job krte krte
@@abhishekdixit7947 Diaper baby ho kya? Ki ladki ho ya ladka lekin rahenge to parents ki hi sath? As a mature couple alag se nahi reh sakte? 😂
@@PDA88 par parents ko apne baccho ki jarurat hoti hai, jaise baccho ko mata pita ki hoti hai,
@@PDA88 par law ye bhi hona chahiye ki agar koi ladki akele hai apne mata pita ke to woh aur uska husband ladki ke parents ka dhyan rakhenge
All i know is that there is no such thing as 'Perfect Relationship'.
Very good speaker. Stay blessed
Priya ji, I appreciate your picking up key legal issues and your explanations. It is an excellent service to all of us. God bless you.🎉
Agree with all, with exception of one where you can divorce if wife asks you to separate from His parents. What about girl’s parents. She had to leave them too.
Are you really a guy??... Then every girl should have a husband like you! 😆
gharjamaai dhund lo, kaun force kar raha?
Shaadi ke liye force hi kaun kar Raha, mat karo shaadi
They said ‘Without valid reasons', pay attention to detail.
Super happy to see some laws for men too.
men's be like: sare kaam me he karu!
I agree with all the judgements 👍
I agree with 1st, 3rd and 4th but I cannot agree with 2nd one. A woman also has to leave her house but that does not give her right to seek divorce but if she says to her husband then he can file. I really cannot understand this.
@Himanshu Singh what if girl is single child??....and has to take care of her parents
@@babyy9921 ghar jamai jo banna chahega uske ladke k sath shadi kar leni chahiye uss ladki ko
If a husband is not agreeing to live separately then wife should not force him to live separately. If in-laws are abusive and husband still does not want to live separately, better that wife get divorced from him because he is not a good husband who can take stand for his wife.
@HimanshuSingh-im9pt but if girl is single child then what can she do? Her parents also are dependent on her.
@@mishirjii I agree with you. The decision should not be unilateral but if a woman wants that I believe the decision should be respected and not to be used against her in the court.
Lagta hai kanoon ne eye drop dala hai
Ujala dikhne lag gaya toda toda 😅😅
My respect towards Calcutta High court 📈
Because everyone should take care of their parents ❤️
How is it sensible when women are forced to live with their in laws while there is no such law for men?
@@nightflame9895 don't Marry simple logic........it's your choice.....if you have a problem with being separated from your parents don't Marry or convince your partner to allow your parents to live with you he will surely agree if he is a good guy and if he is not then why are u marrying a bad guy?🗿🗿🤡
@@FaltuGyaan69 kya bol rha h bhai ye ladkiyan paise dekhkar shadi karti h, aacha bura dekha kar nhi
@@nightflame9895 ab tum Bharat ki sanskriti ko challenge kar Rahi ho ki mard ab sasural me Ghar jamai ban kar rhae😂
इस चीज के भी मां-बाप जिम्मेदार है
और समाज
पुरानी प्रथा है
If anyone told me to leave my parents. Whether wife, gf etc I would leave them but not my parents.
I will make all these things clear if not ready for divorce or do not marry me, even if I need to stay a virgin for life nothing bigger than my mom and dad.
That is called equality and going towards real democracy.
Separation from parents should apply for both sides ..
Then the infertile thing should apply for both sides... 😊
@@loveyourself-n6yagreed and I think that is how it is, but I hope you understand difference between infertility and impotency and sexual incompatibility.
Then don't marry it's that simple?
How do you think that will work genius
@@lordvader3697 these keyboard warriors are always impractical
What if husband forces her to stay away from her parents?
Esa girls hi hota hai mostly cases me, wese agar Husband karenge toh Wife bhi toh divorce de sakti hai par woh shayad Husband ko hi support karegi.
To shaadi hi mat karo😂
As a single girl child I will not marry ant Indian male and I will told my don't marry Indian male and they don't went 😂😂
Lol, be logical and Don't marry then
Behen , kya bol rahi ho ?
India mei shaadi matlab , ladki apni ghar chodkar pati ki ghaar jati hai, leaving her parents behind.
But Aajtak ek bhi aise husband nhi dekhi maine , jo yeh bolta hai , *apni family se milo hi nhi* .
वैसे मुझे कोई वकालत के वीडियो देखने में कोई इंटरेस्ट नहीं है लेकिन आप इतने प्यार से बोलते हो कि पूरा वीडियो देखनापड़ता है😅😅
2nd one is should also be implemented for women who don't want to leave their parents. 4th one also. See both of these problems have similar solutions. No question divorce. If a couple wants to get divorced they should get it irrespective of anything or any reason. See if even 1 person can't live in marriage they shouldn't stay. Forcing people together creates problems more than it already is. If people don't want to be together they shouldn't be together.This will absolutely solve all marriage related problems once n for all. No need to bring situational scenarios to justify divorce. God our courts are so slow.