I'm a huge fan of Discovery Institute and the 'ID the Future' podcasts. I've been listening since the earliest days when listening meant downloading from your website. In most cases, listening is enough. However, these TH-cam versions of your podcast, especially when describing something as complex as cell division, need images and video. It would be so easy to drop the audio track into a Video Editor and then drop some photos, animations, and video on top.
Yes! I was not interested in basic science research because I could not stand the atheist materialistic world-view that is regnant at universities, I was drawn to Medicine instead, where a person could maintain his basic humanity..
Just remember that DNA CODE CAN'T SELF-CREATE and SELF-ASSEMBLE into cells ACCIDENTALLY. Impossible. Thos rendered rhe mythology of abiogenesis impossible. The materialist/naturalists are done. Game over. Worse than this is the evolutionary mythology. Succesive Novel Functional Proteins NEVER "emerge" according to all scientific methodology. It was ATHEISTIC FAITH of a God-Hating Darwin and his man atheistic fans. 2 chromosomes NEVER combine on a telomere to form a new species. Hilariously, silly evolutionists allow THE PATENTING of DNA CODE...fact... for plants. When a duplicate copy with NO NEW CODE is formed in a plant species, it enlarges the plant for man to eat. It doesn't benefit the organism, but the evolutionists declare larger cells as "beneficial". It's beneficial to animals who eat the plant. Otherwise it isn't "superior"! So there remains NO "PROCESS" allowing or showing and mythical "pre-chimp to "evolve" into an equally mythical "pre-human". It's all garbage science. The evidence stands in stark CONTRAST to evolutionists' wishful options and feelings. It's game-over for the MYTHOLOGIES of naturalism. We are literally dancing on the gravestone of naturalism.
@@sliglusamelius8578 lol. This is religion in a nutshell. Science doesn’t accept my Bible claims, so I’ll throw out the science. Sad. Medicine uses evolution too.
The thing I have never understood about the theory of evolution is how sexual reproduction could have started. For this to happen, a single organism would have had to split into two and create two distinct organisms, where both sets of genes are perfectly compatible with one another. But how could such a flawless mechanism have originated? This isn’t just evolution; it’s co-evolution. If there had been even a single error in one of these organisms, one of them would not have survived, and sexual reproduction could never have begun.
Oh the geniuses will tell you that hermaphroditic organisms magically became specialized to be male or female. The details are never elucidated, they wave the magic wand of "time and evolution" and presto!!
From two isolated cells… egg and sperm… combines genes and chromosomes… and immediately starts dividing through mitosis and developing hundreds of sophisticated operating cells, then millions, billions and trillions of unique cells, each containing DNA instructions to create and perform extremely unique functions and organs , from nerve to muscle to brain cells. All independently created while accepting nutrients from the mother, often without any conscious effort upon the mother. Man has never developed anything as sophisticated or complex as the cell. Not even with trillions of hours of focused scientific research, conducted in hundreds of Universities and labs throughout the world.
Origin of life has always been the kryptonite to naturalism. Naturalists will say it's an argument from ignorance, but deny the very engineering principles and logic required for their system to begin operating. We are made fun of for having faith, but the very foundation for rejecting God is based on this belief of life spontaneously originating. Just as a clock requires many parts to operate, so does systems within the cell. Getting this point across to some people seems to be a huge task. And it's a sad thing to see when those who can't argue it, squirm and deny any meaning.
I'm a huge fan of Discovery Institute and the 'ID the Future' podcasts. I've been listening since the earliest days when listening meant downloading from your website. In most cases, listening is enough. However, these TH-cam versions of your podcast, especially when describing something as complex as cell division, need images and video. It would be so easy to drop the audio track into a Video Editor and then drop some photos, animations, and video on top.
Make biology intelligent again!
Yes! I was not interested in basic science research because I could not stand the atheist materialistic world-view that is regnant at universities, I was drawn to Medicine instead, where a person could maintain his basic humanity..
Just remember that DNA CODE CAN'T SELF-CREATE and SELF-ASSEMBLE into cells ACCIDENTALLY. Impossible.
Thos rendered rhe mythology of abiogenesis impossible. The materialist/naturalists are done. Game over.
Worse than this is the evolutionary mythology. Succesive Novel Functional Proteins NEVER "emerge" according to all scientific methodology. It was ATHEISTIC FAITH of a God-Hating Darwin and his man atheistic fans.
2 chromosomes NEVER combine on a telomere to form a new species. Hilariously, silly evolutionists allow THE PATENTING of DNA CODE...fact... for plants. When a duplicate copy with NO NEW CODE is formed in a plant species, it enlarges the plant for man to eat. It doesn't benefit the organism, but the evolutionists declare larger cells as "beneficial". It's beneficial to animals who eat the plant. Otherwise it isn't "superior"! So there remains NO "PROCESS" allowing or showing and mythical "pre-chimp to "evolve" into an equally mythical "pre-human". It's all garbage science. The evidence stands in stark CONTRAST to evolutionists' wishful options and feelings.
It's game-over for the MYTHOLOGIES of naturalism. We are literally dancing on the gravestone of naturalism.
@@sliglusamelius8578 lol. This is religion in a nutshell. Science doesn’t accept my Bible claims, so I’ll throw out the science. Sad.
Medicine uses evolution too.
@@GreatBehoover Wow you just kind of say stuff. Go read some of the published work in this area.
I haven't been keeping up with these amazing videos
U must listen to all 4. Amazing!
@@jamesmiller7457 Eventually I'll get back into binge watching them, but thanks for the reference.
Try a science book.
The thing I have never understood about the theory of evolution is how sexual reproduction could have started. For this to happen, a single organism would have had to split into two and create two distinct organisms, where both sets of genes are perfectly compatible with one another. But how could such a flawless mechanism have originated? This isn’t just evolution; it’s co-evolution. If there had been even a single error in one of these organisms, one of them would not have survived, and sexual reproduction could never have begun.
Oh the geniuses will tell you that hermaphroditic organisms magically became specialized to be male or female. The details are never elucidated, they wave the magic wand of "time and evolution" and presto!!
Which came first the penis or the vagina?
Somehow Atheists are very good storytellers and can write their own evolution. They give us theists more credit than they give themselves 🙃
From two isolated cells… egg and sperm… combines genes and chromosomes… and immediately starts dividing through mitosis and developing hundreds of sophisticated operating cells, then millions, billions and trillions of unique cells, each containing DNA instructions to create and perform extremely unique functions and organs , from nerve to muscle to brain cells. All independently created while accepting nutrients from the mother, often without any conscious effort upon the mother.
Man has never developed anything as sophisticated or complex as the cell. Not even with trillions of hours of focused scientific research, conducted in hundreds of Universities and labs throughout the world.
@JosiahFickinger creative bunch
Pleaae write a book. Possible title: Darwin's Black Hole
Thank you so much for this explanation. This destroys the foundation for evolution, essentially disproving the luca, primordial soup speculations.
_"... concludes a four-part series ..."??_
Why don't you link to parts 1, 2 & 3 in the video description??
👍
Origin of life has always been the kryptonite to naturalism. Naturalists will say it's an argument from ignorance, but deny the very engineering principles and logic required for their system to begin operating.
We are made fun of for having faith, but the very foundation for rejecting God is based on this belief of life spontaneously originating.
Just as a clock requires many parts to operate, so does systems within the cell. Getting this point across to some people seems to be a huge task. And it's a sad thing to see when those who can't argue it, squirm and deny any meaning.
Maybe this TH-cam video will overturn the theory of evolution and the thousands and thousands of peer reviewed papers and testing. 🤞