I found recently some features rdr1 has but rdr2 doesnt 1.pissing peds in toilet 2.peds actually get off and ride each train station 3.pumping water has physics And maybe more..
If RDR 2 miss some of those details from RDR 1 the fans start complaining about it. Even If RDR 2 has more details than RDR 1 the fans start complaining about the game being too realistic. So Moral of the Story is that everyone will complain about you even if you done something great in your life so just ignore them. Not many game prequels/sequels are as great as RDR 2 my friend.
Nah, this video so subjective. Imo, only 2-3 your notice is really better in rdr1, like John's face, water animation in that metall thing.. But others just subjective, especially about horse, when you call him. For me realism is better, I really enjoyed while just walking in nature, and exploring something while walking to my horse
Youi forgot another detail in RDR1 which RDR2 doesn't have: Sometimes, you will heard your enemies's Wilhelm scream when you killed them in RDR1. There's no Wilhelm Scream in RDR2.
Most of those things are total nitpicking and have to completely disagree with last two points. I liked RDR2 deadeye more.Its way more cinematic. And the horse calling thingie is actually nice detail. Adds to realism if your horse cant magically teleport.
Here's another detail in RDR2 that were also in RDR1 but nobody pointed it out yet: Sometimes when you killed your enemies while they are still riding their horses, their legs will get stucked on the horse saddle for awhile. It was a detail in RDR2 but it happened in RDR1 too albeit much more rarely in RDR1. I've seen it in my RDR1 gameplay as well.
Bro i can aswell tell you a thousand things Rdr2 does better than Rd1
หลายเดือนก่อน +5
Absolutely horse shit... I like almost everything more in RDR2 except how John looks in epiloges.. all other stuffs mentioned in this video it´s not better. Ofc its my opinions :) enjoy the game guys. Both of em.
Both games are masterpiece, people are always bi****ing about small things (it's too realistic, or it's not realistic), only thing that is not right is that RDR1 on PC released with 50 dollar price tag without multiplayer.
You don't break horses like that in real life. The water effect when you look at the clouds when it rains ruins immersion. Drain Pipes usually don't have that much water. and yeah, RDR2 has much simpler parkour. The glass stuff was done for aesthetic reasons. The cart physics is not as advanced because I suppose they wanted the players to have more convinience. RDR2's horse rearing looks more realistic and accurate. And yeah, john was very downgraded. Dead eye itself is a very unrealistic thing, but in RDR1, john shoots soo unbelieveably fast, it is impossible. While in RDR2, it's a bit slower for realism. And RDR2 probably wanted to make the whistle feature more realistic, even though the idea of whistling to make your horse come to you is unrealistic at best.
@@Rubrasileiro It is absolutely not. Red Dead Redemption 2 is vastly superior to RDR 1 in almost every way. Some of the features can be better in RDR 1, even the Ragdoll that Red Dead 2 uses actually has some weight and frictions behind it. It's not like floating in the air like you are on the moon. Shooting Ragdolls can be better in RDR 1 but still it's very debatable. In Red Dead Redemption 2, everything just feels bigger, more real, and a lot more alive compared to Red Dead Redemption 1. The world’s packed with these tiny details, from animals reacting to your presence to unpredictable weather changes, which really makes you feel like you’re part of the Wild West. The graphics are on another level. Every sunrise, every leaf rustling, it’s so visually detailed that you can almost feel the dust under your boots. The character movement’s more natural, too, and the animations make the world look lifelike. Then there’s the story. RDR2 digs into the backstory of the Van der Linde gang and gives you a complex, relatable protagonist in Arthur Morgan. You’re not just playing through missions; you’re watching Arthur grow and seeing the gang dynamics shift. Plus, characters like Dutch and John Marston are developed even more here, adding layers to the story that carry over into RDR1. Gameplay’s also leveled up. You have realistic survival elements now, like managing your health and your horse’s condition, cleaning your guns, and even deciding how Arthur looks. The AI is smarter, too, so NPCs react more naturally to your choices. Sometimes they even remember what you’ve done before, which was pretty limited in the first game. RDR2 also has tons of side activities. You can hunt, fish, play poker, go treasure hunting-all kinds of things that make the world feel like it’s full of possibilities. And then there’s the combat. It’s more refined, the gunplay’s smoother, and you have weapon maintenance to think about. The Dead Eye targeting system got a nice upgrade too, giving you more options in a fight. Another big thing? The map. RDR2’s map is vast, with everything from snowy mountains to murky swamps. Each area feels unique, with different animals, plants, and weather patterns, which adds a ton of variety. Plus, horses feel like real partners this time. You can actually bond with your horse, and if you lose it, it hits hard. They’re not just a means of getting around. Lastly, RDR2’s a prequel, so you get this whole new perspective on the original story. Seeing the gang’s rise and fall gives RDR1’s story even more depth. It’s like watching the lead-up to a big, tragic finale that you already know is coming, which makes it hit harder. So, overall, RDR2 just builds on everything RDR1 started and pushes it further, turning the experience into something a lot richer, more immersive, and honestly, unforgettable.
What do you like/dislike the most in RDR games? 🤠
@@PlayGroundComparisons not having hot coffee without mod
I found recently some features rdr1 has but rdr2 doesnt
1.pissing peds in toilet
2.peds actually get off and ride each train station
3.pumping water has physics
And maybe more..
If RDR 2 miss some of those details from RDR 1 the fans start complaining about it.
Even If RDR 2 has more details than RDR 1 the fans start complaining about the game being too realistic.
So Moral of the Story is that everyone will complain about you even if you done something great in your life so just ignore them. Not many game prequels/sequels are as great as RDR 2 my friend.
Yeah.. people always will hate something because of nostalgia. This video is so subjective imo
Yeah i just hate those people😂
Some people even say the game is too perfect like come on😂😂
Nostalgia is one hell of a drug
Imagine a game being too realistic, players start complaining
No thats bullshit
Gta 6 might face this issue..
@@ashwin3603fr
@@ashwin3603some people will always have problem😂
Rdr 1 in gta 4 western
Rdr 2 in gta 5 western
Rdr 2 is way better than gta 5. Rdr 1 is better than all.
RDR2 better than all of them, more immersive, raw and realistic. 😎
@@charlyg-2590nah you haven't played rdr1 bro it has more activitys and it is more immersive imo
No? Gta v sucked gta iv was still good
@@charlyg-2590 yes but rdr1 is also good. gta 4 beats most of them too. graphics arent needed for a games story to be good and immersive
last one detail about calling horse is more reallistic in rdr2 than rdr1
John and Geralt both have the same power logic which is able to spawn horses next to them by just whistling for their horses.
Nah, this video so subjective. Imo, only 2-3 your notice is really better in rdr1, like John's face, water animation in that metall thing..
But others just subjective, especially about horse, when you call him. For me realism is better, I really enjoyed while just walking in nature, and exploring something while walking to my horse
RDR2 is way better
💀
This kid has no idea 😂
@@Bugmastery What are you on about 😂
Youi forgot another detail in RDR1 which RDR2 doesn't have:
Sometimes, you will heard your enemies's Wilhelm scream when you killed them in RDR1. There's no Wilhelm Scream in RDR2.
thats not a detail it's more of a joke since the Wilhelm scream is a stock sound effect
@@sliceddpbj Still, i wished they added it in RDR2 too. It was funny.
@@backyardbrawler-e2q yeah it would have been good in rdr2
Most of those things are total nitpicking and have to completely disagree with last two points. I liked RDR2 deadeye more.Its way more cinematic. And the horse calling thingie is actually nice detail. Adds to realism if your horse cant magically teleport.
Here's another detail in RDR2 that were also in RDR1 but nobody pointed it out yet:
Sometimes when you killed your enemies while they are still riding their horses, their legs will get stucked on the horse saddle for awhile. It was a detail in RDR2 but it happened in RDR1 too albeit much more rarely in RDR1. I've seen it in my RDR1 gameplay as well.
RDR2 > RDR in every aspect
John Marston > Arthur Morgan
@@Bugmastery Arthur >>>>>>>> Every video game protogonists
@@kailaskunjumon bruh
People be always comparing you calling john marston greater than arthur is driven by nostalgia
@@Bugmasteryarthur character is much better and well written ..lil bro
Keep nostalgia away then you will
undersatnd 😂
The last few points are very subjective , it depends on preference
Rdr 1 John >>>>>>
Nostalgic fanboii😂
@Andrewtate200 no! Arthur was the best char who made by rockstar
Bro i dont wanna call my horse in Saint Denis and wait him to appear meanwhile he is in Armadillo
So funny a lot of things just subjective mind of nostalgia
No doubt,some minor thing maybe better in rdr1 other than that RDR2 SLAP
This guy needs some nostalgic clowns attention i guess😂
Bro i can aswell tell you a thousand things Rdr2 does better than Rd1
Absolutely horse shit... I like almost everything more in RDR2 except how John looks in epiloges.. all other stuffs mentioned in this video it´s not better. Ofc its my opinions :) enjoy the game guys. Both of em.
Both games are masterpiece, people are always bi****ing about small things (it's too realistic, or it's not realistic), only thing that is not right is that RDR1 on PC released with 50 dollar price tag without multiplayer.
Rdr1 is such a masterpiece
that dead eye comparison is so unfair that i wan to punch this video
5:30 judging mane physics after rearing your horse😭😭
Now ask him to swim. 😂
awesoooooooooooooome
You don't break horses like that in real life. The water effect when you look at the clouds when it rains ruins immersion. Drain Pipes usually don't have that much water. and yeah, RDR2 has much simpler parkour. The glass stuff was done for aesthetic reasons. The cart physics is not as advanced because I suppose they wanted the players to have more convinience. RDR2's horse rearing looks more realistic and accurate. And yeah, john was very downgraded. Dead eye itself is a very unrealistic thing, but in RDR1, john shoots soo unbelieveably fast, it is impossible. While in RDR2, it's a bit slower for realism. And RDR2 probably wanted to make the whistle feature more realistic, even though the idea of whistling to make your horse come to you is unrealistic at best.
I mean extra drop effect was also in vice City
Bro Bro, glitches are more physics-based
pc players just have to press A and D for balance XD
why is john so tall and lanky and has Arthurs wide ass jaw in rdr2?
I want to play this game very much. Can the person on Steam account add me to the Steam family if it doesn't cause any problems?
gta 4 + rdr 1
Rdr1>>>>>
My foot😂
john marston so bad in rd2 !
😆😆😆 RDR is a cool game, of course. But all the points described are far-fetched. Except perhaps point 3.
Really ?? 😂
RDR1: Epic 😎
RDR2: Boring 😴
Rdr1 :dogshit
Rdr2: masterpiece
@@Andrewtate200 Andrewtate200: dumb
Rdr is gta4
Rdr 2 is gta 5
Rdr1 is better than gta 4 and rdr2 is better than gta 5. Gta 4 is better than 5, red dead is better than 2.
@Rubrasileiro
Proved ✅️
@@hamzza07x I am an og.
@@Rubrasileiro bro comparing games like proving a math equation
@@sliceddpbj 😅
Rdr 1 is better overall. You will aknowledge it one day.
No bro rdr1 is very better in vibe but about other things rdr2 is better
@MANIRFY1387 what about shooting physic ? Ragdoll ? What about locations variety ? Annexes after the game being complete ?? Rdr 1 is better.
@@Rubrasileiro it's your opinion
@@MANIRFY1387 I am talking about facts here kid
@@Rubrasileiro It is absolutely not. Red Dead Redemption 2 is vastly superior to RDR 1 in almost every way. Some of the features can be better in RDR 1, even the Ragdoll that Red Dead 2 uses actually has some weight and frictions behind it. It's not like floating in the air like you are on the moon. Shooting Ragdolls can be better in RDR 1 but still it's very debatable.
In Red Dead Redemption 2, everything just feels bigger, more real, and a lot more alive compared to Red Dead Redemption 1. The world’s packed with these tiny details, from animals reacting to your presence to unpredictable weather changes, which really makes you feel like you’re part of the Wild West.
The graphics are on another level. Every sunrise, every leaf rustling, it’s so visually detailed that you can almost feel the dust under your boots. The character movement’s more natural, too, and the animations make the world look lifelike.
Then there’s the story. RDR2 digs into the backstory of the Van der Linde gang and gives you a complex, relatable protagonist in Arthur Morgan. You’re not just playing through missions; you’re watching Arthur grow and seeing the gang dynamics shift. Plus, characters like Dutch and John Marston are developed even more here, adding layers to the story that carry over into RDR1.
Gameplay’s also leveled up. You have realistic survival elements now, like managing your health and your horse’s condition, cleaning your guns, and even deciding how Arthur looks. The AI is smarter, too, so NPCs react more naturally to your choices. Sometimes they even remember what you’ve done before, which was pretty limited in the first game.
RDR2 also has tons of side activities. You can hunt, fish, play poker, go treasure hunting-all kinds of things that make the world feel like it’s full of possibilities. And then there’s the combat. It’s more refined, the gunplay’s smoother, and you have weapon maintenance to think about. The Dead Eye targeting system got a nice upgrade too, giving you more options in a fight.
Another big thing? The map. RDR2’s map is vast, with everything from snowy mountains to murky swamps. Each area feels unique, with different animals, plants, and weather patterns, which adds a ton of variety. Plus, horses feel like real partners this time. You can actually bond with your horse, and if you lose it, it hits hard. They’re not just a means of getting around.
Lastly, RDR2’s a prequel, so you get this whole new perspective on the original story. Seeing the gang’s rise and fall gives RDR1’s story even more depth. It’s like watching the lead-up to a big, tragic finale that you already know is coming, which makes it hit harder.
So, overall, RDR2 just builds on everything RDR1 started and pushes it further, turning the experience into something a lot richer, more immersive, and honestly, unforgettable.