Yes, you are correct in an absolute sense. However, in relative sense the seer and seen are different and you must start it with because no one can understand that seer and seen are different unless you create a sense of separation. But, at the end you must accept that there's no such thing as this or that. It IS as it IS.
I said that ahead in this video that maybe his intention was to tell the process by which seeing happens. Without understanding that maybe dissolving sense of separation is difficult. Thankyou for beautiful comment 😊🙏
What you're stating is the Final Truth told by Gaudapada and other saints like Ramana Maharshi. However, it is quite difficult to digest cause it says that 'there is no seeker, no seeking, no enlightenment, no ignorance, no duality or non duality.' Ramana Maharshi said that there is no method required to reach the truth, just be still and silent. But, we think that we must do something to attain something, so he said to inquire within. What saints told us was as per our maturity; in reality the absolute cannot be shared by words. So, you need to state the context first before elaborating.
Yes jiddu also said the same thing, that don't move, remain with what is, I will upload video about doing, non doer, nishkaam karma in one or two days, according to my understanding of it, hopeful to recieve your valuable discussion there also, never read gaurapada, I thought that he is from bhakti, would add him to list now.
We did not try to see the tree in a particular way, we just removed the image of the tree inside us, now whatever is visible, is visible on its own❤Look carefully, maybe you'll understand
Who removed the image of tree, isn't it "me" who is trying to conceal image because now it is scared of the image? It's me who removed the image with intent. Intent is desire to feel extremely good. Atleast it is what I see, that it is me who removed the image of tree. He told that knowledge is always limited. And that knowing self has no end. Let's see what's ahead in this story for us. 🙏😊
@goodgreatlife Awakening the exploration within you and seeing how when one thing goes, another takes its place and when a person understands all the structures and thoughts within him, then he automatically becomes a part of his intelligence.You did not remove that picture, you have just asked a question inside you and are answering it and you feel that do not keep any desire as a , Whatever is inside you will come to you automatically without any desire.🫡🥹
You are in a confusion. Suppose that it is a rose 🌹 flower tree. You will call it a rose flower tree. But is it? If your name is Amish, everybody will call you Amish, just like the rose flower tree. Now the biggest question is are you Amish? Don't question great people just like that. Try to learn and understand deeply. Last, knowledge is not same as knowing. Knowledge is not same as experiencing 😂😂
Firstly sir, he told that he should be questioned and everyone should be, that don't just accept, he told this in his each talk almost, secondly, you didn't listened whole, yes I am in confusion. I am in my opinion not even me, because he himself told that me doesn't exist. I can't accept word is not thing because both are matter, you and me are same matter formed of energy. It is Advaita. He told that everyone is same, right? I just extended it, I said that everything is same also which is true according to him, because he told that thoughts are matter, tree is also matter, name of tree is formed of thoughts so name is also matter. So name and thing is same. He knew that.
@goodgreatlife Partially you are right. He said you should question everything till you get your own true answer. In the same breath, you should also question yourself. He didn't say you don't exist. He said that you as an ego do not exist. The ego is false. But you very much exist as a true self. This true self has to be part of your own existential experience. There is nothing wrong in any opinion. But you should say that it is your opinion. Thanks 😊
Yes, I didn't claim that I am right sir, in video I told that "I could be wrong and please have a discussion if you consider that actuality is otherwise". It is not important that something is formed in my opinion. I also told that his intent could be that he wanted us to know of process of mind, but now that we know it, we should go ahead and see "what is" ahead. Because it is ever changing. You are also him, right? Opinions are just floating in you. It's gone now.
Right👌👌
Yes, you are correct in an absolute sense. However, in relative sense the seer and seen are different and you must start it with because no one can understand that seer and seen are different unless you create a sense of separation. But, at the end you must accept that there's no such thing as this or that. It IS as it IS.
I said that ahead in this video that maybe his intention was to tell the process by which seeing happens. Without understanding that maybe dissolving sense of separation is difficult. Thankyou for beautiful comment 😊🙏
What you're stating is the Final Truth told by Gaudapada and other saints like Ramana Maharshi. However, it is quite difficult to digest cause it says that 'there is no seeker, no seeking, no enlightenment, no ignorance, no duality or non duality.'
Ramana Maharshi said that there is no method required to reach the truth, just be still and silent. But, we think that we must do something to attain something, so he said to inquire within.
What saints told us was as per our maturity; in reality the absolute cannot be shared by words. So, you need to state the context first before elaborating.
Yes jiddu also said the same thing, that don't move, remain with what is, I will upload video about doing, non doer, nishkaam karma in one or two days, according to my understanding of it, hopeful to recieve your valuable discussion there also, never read gaurapada, I thought that he is from bhakti, would add him to list now.
Observer is observed
We did not try to see the tree in a particular way, we just removed the image of the tree inside us, now whatever is visible, is visible on its own❤Look carefully, maybe you'll understand
Who removed the image of tree, isn't it "me" who is trying to conceal image because now it is scared of the image? It's me who removed the image with intent. Intent is desire to feel extremely good. Atleast it is what I see, that it is me who removed the image of tree. He told that knowledge is always limited. And that knowing self has no end. Let's see what's ahead in this story for us. 🙏😊
@goodgreatlife Awakening the exploration within you and seeing how when one thing goes, another takes its place and when a person understands all the structures and thoughts within him, then he automatically becomes a part of his intelligence.You did not remove that picture, you have just asked a question inside you and are answering it and you feel that do not keep any desire as a , Whatever is inside you will come to you automatically without any desire.🫡🥹
You are in a confusion. Suppose that it is a rose 🌹 flower tree. You will call it a rose flower tree. But is it? If your name is Amish, everybody will call you Amish, just like the rose flower tree. Now the biggest question is are you Amish? Don't question great people just like that. Try to learn and understand deeply. Last, knowledge is not same as knowing. Knowledge is not same as experiencing 😂😂
Firstly sir, he told that he should be questioned and everyone should be, that don't just accept, he told this in his each talk almost, secondly, you didn't listened whole, yes I am in confusion. I am in my opinion not even me, because he himself told that me doesn't exist. I can't accept word is not thing because both are matter, you and me are same matter formed of energy. It is Advaita. He told that everyone is same, right? I just extended it, I said that everything is same also which is true according to him, because he told that thoughts are matter, tree is also matter, name of tree is formed of thoughts so name is also matter. So name and thing is same. He knew that.
@goodgreatlife Partially you are right. He said you should question everything till you get your own true answer. In the same breath, you should also question yourself. He didn't say you don't exist. He said that you as an ego do not exist. The ego is false. But you very much exist as a true self. This true self has to be part of your own existential experience. There is nothing wrong in any opinion. But you should say that it is your opinion. Thanks 😊
Yes, I didn't claim that I am right sir, in video I told that "I could be wrong and please have a discussion if you consider that actuality is otherwise". It is not important that something is formed in my opinion. I also told that his intent could be that he wanted us to know of process of mind, but now that we know it, we should go ahead and see "what is" ahead. Because it is ever changing. You are also him, right? Opinions are just floating in you. It's gone now.
@@goodgreatlife Everything is changing but not the soul. The soul is unchanging 😀
Jiddu no one napaora tha
Bhai iska intention nahi hai jaisa tum laga rahe ho yeh tum jaisa intention chaho vaisa bana lo
आप ने पूरा शायद नहीं सुना महोदय ।