Experimental setup & saturation current: photoelectric effect | Dual nature of light | Khan Academy

Let's explore how to measure the no. of photoelectrons emitted per second experimentally, in photoelectric effect. We will also draw a graph of the photocurrent vs anode potential.
Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help!
Donate here: www.khanacademy.org/donate?ut...
Created by Mahesh Shenoy

[@thanishas5215]

It is surprising that his videos are getting only few views😔.....what else we need...i literally say that he is the no.1 of the best tutors i have ever seen....he makes me to love each and every part of physics....
Thank you so much sir for ur videos...🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

[@hammadkhan5264]

I didn't like physics but when I take physics lectures of khan academy, especially with this guy it changed my mind and now I like the physics most❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@parahumour4619]

I love this method of teaching in which you make u figure out stuff by ourselves. Each video feels like a video game level...this channel deserves so much more views

[@harinimalla1647]

once again you make the statement true that
'' a good teacher can make a topic more interesting "
'thank you, sir🙏

[@_jubileeeeee]

This guy’s excitement gets me excited to learn physics

[@Bill-xn9tp]

Very helpful. Great presentation. Beautiful.

[@juliandesens]

Thank you for making the graph! It helped tremendously!

[@Vijaykumar369S]

Hatts off you sir....very good and it's easy to understand.....do more video in all concepts

[@nottheinsomnia]

Thank you Mahesh bhaiyaa .

[@kabirsethi2608]

Very well explained sir

[@newman8284]

great explanation

[@divy_maurya]

Wow, amazing

[@tendi.rutsate]

Thank you so much wow!

[@lifeuncut4538]

Awesome teaching

[@naveenmydur9724]

Well explained

[@literallyfantastic2144]

Hey I love you.

[@shahusardar2762]

Thank youu

[@procrastinatingproductivel2031]

damn thank you sm

[@selin4393]

Thank you

[@xiaoruiwang4545]

excellent

[@rajamajeed5257]

Best teacher...no worries ❤

[@fragon8188]

Fang-tastic 🔥

[@ManojKumar-xk1wp]

we are increasing the potential the electrons speed also increases ,since i=nq/t u are saying n becomes constant but that does not mean q/t is constant then why current is getting saturation value

[@halumgrr]

As we increase the voltage, the collector receives more electron per second and also they're being attracted with much greater force than before(because of more voltage), so the electrons should be received and circulating in the circuit quicker than before, shouldn't that result in higher circuit current regardless of the fact that we cannot increase the no. of electrons received per second anymore? ( therefore no thing as saturation current). What point am I missing?

[@jerven1128]

i think that, even though the electrons are circulating quicker than before in the circuit, the current should still depend on how fast they travel through the air gap between the emitter and the collector, for ex if 100 electrons go from the +ive terminal to the emitter and the incident photons just have enough energy to emit 10 photoelectrons from the emitter, it will take 10 seconds for them to pass that gap and get to the -ive terminal, thus restricting the current to 10e/s even though the potential was enough to move 100 electrons.
that sort of makes sense i guess????

[@rishavjain5087]

Path is broken dude ..the circuit is open...when u got the first batch of e- , they returned to the Zn plate....and can only pop out if they got energy from photons... Experiment's pretty full proof

[@VG__]

6:25 saturation current

[@arhamdugar396]

i have a question
by increasing the voltage, we have decreased the work function and increased the kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons so why does photocurrent become constant and does not increase as velocity of electrons will increase with increase in potential difference?

[@okellokennedy6048]

By setting up a pd (the collector being positive with respect to emitter)

[@dravikumar4401]

Here, in saturation current topic we have seen photon ejected almost all the electrons
Then it must have efficiency like more than 90% right but why the efficiency of photoelectric effect is nearly 0.1%?

[@sitcomshorts8749]

If electrons are collected using voltage that would result in more electron that is to say the pulling out of electron would not be impartial to light now.

[@muneerkhan1176]

Collector is which metal sir.

[@electroniciit9304]

what if the photoelectrons are just coming out with no kinetic energy . will the system still detect photoelectrons .

[@sainidhikarthikeyan2291]

Actually speaking, saturation current/e gives the number of photoelectrons/sec right?

[@katyayani5643]

anyone from 23 batch?