100 other physics teachers on youtube have failed in what you excell at... Teaching us laymen the details and what we want to know. Great video,and dont be afraid of teaching the details. We want to know
Dear Professor Gibson, thank you for making Nuclear Physics a little clearer for us non-specialists. You told us to ask questions. Here is one. You said quarks are never observed alone. Then how the interactions between quarks were observed ?!
Man!!! You are so gifted!!! Certainly one of the best teachers on TH-cam. Thank you for sharing your knowledge, allowing me to understand what I was struggling with for years. Of course I subscribe!!!
I like how you speak a language that I understand, I heard so many physicist talk about this, and I don't think I lasted any of their lectures more than 5 min
Thank you for this incredible video on the strong nuclear force! Your explanations are truly gold, and it’s clear how much effort you put into making this complex topic understandable. I really hope your work reaches a wider audience because people could benefit so much from content like this. Looking forward to seeing more videos from you! Love from Kurdistan region in Iraq ♥️
Nobody buys into what I say about physics, and I don't blame them. I'm not a physicist, and I don't play one on TV, but have you ever seen an atom with more than one proton in the nucleus, but without any neutrons? Of course not. You cannot squeeze two protons together and make them stick. You've got to have neutrons. Neutrons aren't simply objects that are neutrally charged, or without charge. They are both positively and negatively charged at the same time. Evidence of that can be found when a proton transmutes to a neutron by way of electron capture. So, a neutron's charge at some level is negative. A neutron is basically a hydrogen atom with an electron squeezed into the nucleus. It's the charge of the electron that appears as a "strong force," and strong, it is. It is strong enough to bind protons together. J. Robert Oppenheimer, however, disagrees. I've listened to a bunch of his lectures, and he says that what I am saying is not true. Yet, what happens to an electron when it is captured by a proton? It's still there in some form, isn't it? Moreover, when a neutron undergoes electron decay, or beta decay, it returns to being a simple hydrogen atom with one proton and one electron, although that electron may very well have enough energy as it is ejected from the neutron to depart its normal orbital position and leave the proton behind in an ionized state. Nevertheless neutrons are formed by squeezing electrons into protons, and neutrons can decay back into their original separated state. If that doesn't tell you that a neutron is merely an electron squeezed into a proton, I don't know what to say. So, the so-called strong force is just another form of electromagnetism -- electromagnetism, up close and very personal. When a proton gets close enough to a neutron it sticks to that neutron and that neutron can stick to another proton, as well, allowing for bigger and bigger atomic nuclei until they get a little bit jiggly because there's just too much positive electrical charge in their nuclei, overwhelming the negative charge found inside of neutrons. It is at that point that atomic nuclei undergo either alpha decay or fission.
It’s actually a really good question and I’ll probably do a video just on that in the future. It’s a combination of two reasons. The first reason is that the electron is not a point object that’s orbiting like a planet. It’s really a wave like structure and that wave has a wavelength and a frequency and so it can’t really get closer to the nucleus because the wave is waving all the way around the circumference at what we call the orbital radius, but it’s really a waving thing and the tail has to connect to the head of the wave in order for the electron to really exist there. The other reason is because of the Heisenberg and certainty principle. If the electron went all the way into the nucleus and literally stuck on top of the proton then their locations would be right on top of each other, and we know that according to Heisenberg, the position and the velocity of a particle cannot both be known at the same time so as it collapses in and actually touches the proton and becomes at the same location then the location of the electron would be precisely known and so it’s velocity has to get more and more erratic. Such a seemingly simple question, but no questions are really simple.
@@MathAndScience That is total theoretical horse shit! The Standard Model is garbage and This is Not the way subatomic particles behave. Electrons are NOT waves they are always particles and the most certainly Do strike the nucleus. As my proof shows and only a mathematician can validate, nucleons are made up of electrons all being held together by the fundamental force of gravity and pushed apart by Photonic energy. Electrons do crash into the nucleus but because they have reached a saturation point, no more electrons can be added and for every electron that strikes the nucleus, another is expelled so to the outside observer it appears to orbit! That is what nuclear electrons are and there is no mystery!
Jason, I want to thank you for your videos. You've come a long way from being a young dude in front of a single whiteboard. Your math videos helped a lot for school. Sorry I couldn't contribute much in terms of direct subscriptions, but I hope I got you a little ad revenue.
This is really great. You anticipate questions. Thank you. Can I make a suggestion? It is so interesting I watch to the end and then it’s done. No time to hit the like button. If you could put a few seconds at the end people might be able to add more likes and subscribes.
Neutrons may be protons that are spinning longitudinally relative to the axial spin of the nucleus, whereas protons may be neutrons that have a centric up spin or down spin relative to the center of the nucleus. Basically, both protons and neutrons may be the same thing, differentiated only by their spin orientation relative to the nucleus. The symbol for gluons spring appears like a wound-up piece of superstring of string theory. One or more of these springs could be imagined as twisting together and interlocking to form heavier 'gluon 'springs' analogous to placing multiple steel springs into a jar and shaking the jar, many springs would intertwine. These quantum string springs (gluons) snap when stretched too far. The strong force may just be the inverse square of the logarithm of the gravitational 'force'.
Up, Down, Top and Bottom make perfect sense. They tell you the particle's polarity and size. Charmed and Strange make no sense. We should call them higher and lower.
Sir, you are the real hero in deliberating in detail & unbiased description of the invisible unsung hero "the strong nuclear force gluon" which is the real master of the universe keeping agitating protons in discipline and creating the universe as we see now, Thank you very much for your excellent narration of particle physics,
There must be an unknown micro structure in the nucleus which must be acting like an envelope holding charges in place…..like orbitals but inside the nucleus
Honest question... You state that neutrons also have/use the strong force and that helps keep a nucleus together, as well as buffer protons apart a little. But you also state that "too many" neutrons, or nothing but neutrons, will allow the nucleus to break apart. If your first statement is true, then 100% neutrons would never break apart since there is no positive force (protons) pushing the apart, and, only neutrons with the strong force keeping them together. Something is clearly missing there 🤷
@@kkolxasram What creates the gravitational field? The mass of the neutrons. A neutron start is the densest material in the universe as there is no space between the neutrons. If the start was larger, the immense gravitation from this dense material 'crushes' it into a black hole. A neutron start core is what happens when there is not quite enough mass to create a black hole.
At 19:00 you mention the virtual photon concept. I’m not convinced that this is anything other than a construct of the underlying EM field model wherein we already know the available exchange energy is quantised. It is incorrect to define a photon as a propagating particle - that can eg be exchanged or sent out to mediate the EM force. In the EM wave model there is no net propagation of anything in the direction of propagation other than the energy and/or phase of the wave. The actual motion (of the oscillating charge carrier) occurs perpendicular to the propagation of the wave - that’s the only thing that is moving but there is no net transit of the charge either. The photon is just a reminder that energy exchanges of light with matter are in digitised chunks rather than via an analog mechanism. The sooner we can debunk the virtual photon exchange model the sooner we can advance.
Dussehra is celebrated in India as a day of victory. In Treta Yuga, it marked Rama’s victory over Ravana, and in Dwapara Yuga, it symbolized the Pandavas' triumph over the Kauravas, known as the victory of righteousness (Dharma) over unrighteousness (Adharma). In today's Kaliyuga, the distinction between Dharma and Adharma is understood by the common people, but not by the elite. What is considered unrighteous for developing countries is not so for developed nations. The United Nations, created to maintain peace, is becoming ineffective because the definition of Dharma and Adharma has faded between rich and poor nations. However, if we delve deeper, we realize that the understanding of the universe (Brahmand) and civilization (quantum) regarding Dharma and Adharma has been clear in every era. Today's dominant civilizations-believers (Jews, Parsis, Christians, Muslims, Sanatanis: Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs), atheists (mechanistic scientists, Marxists), and both (woke)-understand the distinction between Dharma and Adharma but do not apply it in practice. As a result, this distinction has shifted from the civilizational level to the individual level. In the upcoming artificial era (AI), it will be difficult to save civilizations, but it will be easier to save individuals. Why? Every individual is fighting within themselves. This struggle is between their understanding (logic) and emotions, both connected to the past. However, the individual also desires to connect with the future they wish to reach. Now, people no longer just want to live; they want to understand life. They are recognizing the Dharma and Adharma within themselves. Thus, every civilization has focused on individual freedom. Civilization transcends nations and politics, connecting people on a global level. If civilization today is quantum, then individuals are like genes, passing their traits from one generation to the next. On this Dussehra, we can all pledge as citizens to pass on the virtues of our civilization to the next generation, ensuring the survival and continuity of humanity and the universe. As Ghalib once said, "When it was time to cry, we all laughed, and now when it’s time to make others laugh, why make them cry?" Let’s raise the flag of Dharma’s victory and make peace with the Adharma within ourselves.
If we’ve never isolated a quark, how can we know they exist? How can we know we don’t simply have protons and neutrons mischaracterized, and that the “strange observations” I’m sure there must have been about nucleic particles aren’t explained by well-described and never-seen phantasms?
@@davidsaintjohn4248 not if there's tons of evidence for quarks; as there is for the Sun being there; or for protons and neutrons existing, for that matter. From my ignorant viewpoint it just seemed like protons and neutrons behave in ways which wouldn't be expected of single packets of energy, or at least, behavior which hadn't been explained in terms of "one object with certain modes" and quarks and other never-seen particles were created/noticed as mathematical patterns which fit the anomalies.
Is decay associated with the position and randomness of protons and neutrons so that if too many or too few are in one volume or quadrant, then it's now unstable?
Correction, neutrons are not stable outside of the nucleus of an atom. They have a half life of just over 10 minutes and decay into a proton, electron, and neutrino.
This is an Oscar-winning 24 minutes explanation of the Atom itself to the best of human knowledge. You are a very good teacher. I believe that what you taught is some fraction of what can be discovered, the quarks is a good name given by the scientist. This will explode on final day, when with this much knowledge, you do not believe that Almighty is one and capable, death is certain yet not believing that Almighty is superior. What Almighty ordered us to read, discover and praises Him for His Holiness. He doesn't need us but do we really don't need Him ? A person if he is born and is normal can have everything like you, teacher who gain so much knowledge and today i am appreciating along all others mean
think of it in term of 3-body motion in the atom and proton and neutron.... chaotic states, hence fuzziness, hence uncertainty principle..... hence quantum mechanic
You absolutely absolutely can, but they’re held in there really tightly with the strong force so the only way you can do. It is a particle accelerator to smash it and when that happens, New atoms lower on the table are created from the parent toms.
The sstrong nuclear force ( or yukawa force As i refer to it) is actually repulsive at distances under 1 fm. But attractive ibside the nucleon. What is the explanation for this odd behavior?
When a proton is ejected from the nucleus, the initial repulsive electromagnetic force is around 70 newtons. 70 newtons pushing against a single proton. Insane. And then the strong force is 100 times stronger! Ludicrous.
Just because you can't explain why the atom just doesn't blow apart, simply add "strong force". But when you see a slow decay of atoms, say "weak force". You can't add and remove things just because it doesn't fit your idea.
Maybe a stupid question. But if neutrons have no charge but have strong nuclear force. Is it possible to have only neutron atoms? I have no knowledge in physics just interested regarding the topic. Maybe the missing matter of the universe is made of neutrons? If anyone knows the answer, I would very much appreciate your input 😊
no one did. this universe is one of an infinite number, all with their own values for the fundamental forces and gravity. We're just in the one that is suitable for life to evolve, how could we be in any other? It's a 100% chance game.
Any nucleus can be destabilized by bombardment which Helium nucleuses. Would you describe mathematically your proposition, because when I studied nuclear physics it was an understood that we have no idea about what you call "strong nuclear force". It sounds a whole like the arguments for "strings", "dark matter", "God particles" to explain those things that have no explanation.
Can you prove that spreading out the protons with neutrons makes the nucleus stable? Are you sure you're not just repeating something that you heard somebody else say? Are you sure it isn't the quarks in the neutrons or some other field?
Summary of question: WE DON'T KNOW so we call it 'strong nuclear force', might as well call it strong 'dark force'. The idea that compressing a proton and electon to make a neutron just means a quark change is asinine; probably the result of tetraethel lead dumming down our physicists...
kind of, but the electrons, not the nucleus. It's called a "Rydberg atom". You would not see it, though, because you maybe only have a few electrons hanging around in that all 5 foot radius, nowhere near enough to scatter any light noticeably. Also that light itself would likely dissolve it, so you could not even look without destroying the atom.
Wow, pump the brakes. The names do have meaning. "Up" ("down") refer to the direction of isospin for protons (neutrons). That's really important for nuclear physics. "strange" is strange because it didn't fit the up/down scheme. charm was charming because it made strange make sense. Then gen 3, top/bottom beat out truth/beauty...but it's similar to up/down.....but really only up/down have a meaning in math/structure. The others are indeed just cute.
Sorry to say but I feel disappointed with your explication of the force which binds protons and neutrons together.You go to a great length explaining strong force inside the proton and neutron but you skip quickly over the force which binds protons and neutrons as a kind of "residual " force of the strong force which somehow also binds the protons and neutrons as a side job. I think we deserve a better explanation of what is supposed to be the main topic of your presentation.
😂😂😂 WRONG! The STRONG force is the binding energy of the atom. The energy that leaves this atomic system is the force of repulsion, that is why the atom holds together, is the force of repulsion has vacated the system in the form of electromagnetic energy. The neutron is the reduction of the electric force between atoms, it makes the atom's electric repulsion reduced and allows the atoms theoretical cross section to increase allowing for nuclear decay because of the reduction of electric repulsion. The more neutrons, the more nuclear interaction because the forces of electromagnetic repulsion are reduced. Particle accelerators analyze fragments of nuclear material, but it doesn't give information to the internal workings of the atom. The "strong" force is a potential well created by the Einstein energy equivalence. To separate the bound particles, the binding energy needs to be returned to the system.
I DO NOT LIKE THE INTRO TO THIS VIDEO... I THINK ITS CALLED THE LOGO THE TEN SECOND OR SO INTRO TO THE VIDEO IT CHEAPENS IT MAKING IT RUN OF THE MILL PLEASE DONT CHANGE YOUR FORMAT, IT WAS PERFECT THE WAY IT WAS
![Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough! How does it Work? - [9]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kHE4lFwh3Vs/mqdefault.jpg)
I would love to hear an interview about your life! You have changed so many lives with your help!
100 other physics teachers on youtube have failed in what you excell at... Teaching us laymen the details and what we want to know. Great video,and dont be afraid of teaching the details. We want to know
Thank you!
What a great explanation. I love your videos. Thanks!
Thank you!
you are one of the best science teachers on youtube.
thanks for all your hard work.
i learn a lot from your videos.
Wow, thanks!
Dear Professor Gibson, thank you for making Nuclear Physics a little clearer for us non-specialists. You told us to ask questions. Here is one. You said quarks are never observed alone. Then how the interactions between quarks were observed ?!
Man!!! You are so gifted!!! Certainly one of the best teachers on TH-cam. Thank you for sharing your knowledge, allowing me to understand what I was struggling with for years. Of course I subscribe!!!
He said nothing you can't find on Wikipedia.
It is been a while, Good to see you , Sir!
I like how you speak a language that I understand, I heard so many physicist talk about this, and I don't think I lasted any of their lectures more than 5 min
Thank you for this incredible video on the strong nuclear force! Your explanations are truly gold, and it’s clear how much effort you put into making this complex topic understandable. I really hope your work reaches a wider audience because people could benefit so much from content like this. Looking forward to seeing more videos from you!
Love from Kurdistan region in Iraq ♥️
Thank you!
Nobody buys into what I say about physics, and I don't blame them. I'm not a physicist, and I don't play one on TV, but have you ever seen an atom with more than one proton in the nucleus, but without any neutrons? Of course not. You cannot squeeze two protons together and make them stick. You've got to have neutrons. Neutrons aren't simply objects that are neutrally charged, or without charge. They are both positively and negatively charged at the same time. Evidence of that can be found when a proton transmutes to a neutron by way of electron capture.
So, a neutron's charge at some level is negative. A neutron is basically a hydrogen atom with an electron squeezed into the nucleus. It's the charge of the electron that appears as a "strong force," and strong, it is. It is strong enough to bind protons together.
J. Robert Oppenheimer, however, disagrees. I've listened to a bunch of his lectures, and he says that what I am saying is not true. Yet, what happens to an electron when it is captured by a proton? It's still there in some form, isn't it? Moreover, when a neutron undergoes electron decay, or beta decay, it returns to being a simple hydrogen atom with one proton and one electron, although that electron may very well have enough energy as it is ejected from the neutron to depart its normal orbital position and leave the proton behind in an ionized state. Nevertheless neutrons are formed by squeezing electrons into protons, and neutrons can decay back into their original separated state. If that doesn't tell you that a neutron is merely an electron squeezed into a proton, I don't know what to say.
So, the so-called strong force is just another form of electromagnetism -- electromagnetism, up close and very personal. When a proton gets close enough to a neutron it sticks to that neutron and that neutron can stick to another proton, as well, allowing for bigger and bigger atomic nuclei until they get a little bit jiggly because there's just too much positive electrical charge in their nuclei, overwhelming the negative charge found inside of neutrons. It is at that point that atomic nuclei undergo either alpha decay or fission.
I actually asked that question in college physics. I also wanted to know what the electrons don’t get sucked to the center of the atom.
It’s actually a really good question and I’ll probably do a video just on that in the future. It’s a combination of two reasons. The first reason is that the electron is not a point object that’s orbiting like a planet. It’s really a wave like structure and that wave has a wavelength and a frequency and so it can’t really get closer to the nucleus because the wave is waving all the way around the circumference at what we call the orbital radius, but it’s really a waving thing and the tail has to connect to the head of the wave in order for the electron to really exist there. The other reason is because of the Heisenberg and certainty principle. If the electron went all the way into the nucleus and literally stuck on top of the proton then their locations would be right on top of each other, and we know that according to Heisenberg, the position and the velocity of a particle cannot both be known at the same time so as it collapses in and actually touches the proton and becomes at the same location then the location of the electron would be precisely known and so it’s velocity has to get more and more erratic.
Such a seemingly simple question, but no questions are really simple.
@@MathAndScience That is total theoretical horse shit! The Standard Model is garbage and This is Not the way subatomic particles behave. Electrons are NOT waves they are always particles and the most certainly Do strike the nucleus. As my proof shows and only a mathematician can validate, nucleons are made up of electrons all being held together by the fundamental force of gravity and pushed apart by Photonic energy. Electrons do crash into the nucleus but because they have reached a saturation point, no more electrons can be added and for every electron that strikes the nucleus, another is expelled so to the outside observer it appears to orbit! That is what nuclear electrons are and there is no mystery!
@@rodkehYou haven't proven anything except the idea you have no idea what you're talking about. Great job on that at least!
@@MadScientist267 As if you knew anything about anything. You know nothing about Physics. You're an idiot!
@@MadScientist267 As if you have the foggiest nothing... Get an education...
Thanks!
Wow thank you so much!
Thanks jason sir making so informative video, love from india♥️♥️
Glad you liked it!
You're amazing! You make it a lot easier for clueless me to understand. I love it!
I have never ever had better teacher in 20 years of attending school than Jason
You are an awesome teacher Sir. Exactly what we need in the universe.
Nice video and presentation.
We legislate in a strong force to explain what we can’t with classical know how.
My favorite YT channel
Many thanks!!
Jason, I want to thank you for your videos. You've come a long way from being a young dude in front of a single whiteboard. Your math videos helped a lot for school. Sorry I couldn't contribute much in terms of direct subscriptions, but I hope I got you a little ad revenue.
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
My favorite subject :
QM- QED, QCD...!!!
I would like to learn more about it...!!!
Thank you so much again ...SIR...!!!
This is really great. You anticipate questions. Thank you.
Can I make a suggestion? It is so interesting I watch to the end and then it’s done. No time to hit the like button. If you could put a few seconds at the end people might be able to add more likes and subscribes.
Loved your work❤❤❤❤❤
Neutrons may be protons that are spinning longitudinally relative to the axial spin of the nucleus, whereas protons may be neutrons that have a centric up spin or down spin relative to the center of the nucleus. Basically, both protons and neutrons may be the same thing, differentiated only by their spin orientation relative to the nucleus.
The symbol for gluons spring appears like a wound-up piece of superstring of string theory. One or more of these springs could be imagined as twisting together and interlocking to form heavier 'gluon 'springs' analogous to placing multiple steel springs into a jar and shaking the jar, many springs would intertwine. These quantum string springs (gluons) snap when stretched too far. The strong force may just be the inverse square of the logarithm of the gravitational 'force'.
No
Nope
Excellent video. 👍🏻
Up, Down, Top and Bottom make perfect sense. They tell you the particle's polarity and size. Charmed and Strange make no sense. We should call them higher and lower.
Fascinating content. Thank you very much for sharing this knowledge. Really like your videos and elegant explanations
Sir, you are the real hero in deliberating in detail & unbiased description of the invisible unsung hero "the strong nuclear force gluon" which is the real master of the universe keeping agitating protons in discipline and creating the universe as we see now, Thank you very much for your excellent narration of particle physics,
First comment! 😂 The force is strong with this video :)
Oh great, your FIRST COMMENT will help me very much in my Ph.D research. Thank you so much for posting so early.
@@muhammadhussainsarhandi9928 I did it just for you ;)
Excellent exposition.
I think it's time for a series of Jason quality lectures on Special and General relativity...
*The most scientifically academic thing I have ever heard in all my entire life:* 12:49
A great lecture !
Very clearly explained. Thank you very much
Very well explained- thank you! (Now I understand a little bit more) 😅
There must be an unknown micro structure in the nucleus which must be acting
like an envelope holding charges
in place…..like orbitals but inside the nucleus
Thank you so much for sharing
Two words: Duct tape. There’s truly nothing it can’t do.
Honest question...
You state that neutrons also have/use the strong force and that helps keep a nucleus together, as well as buffer protons apart a little.
But you also state that "too many" neutrons, or nothing but neutrons, will allow the nucleus to break apart.
If your first statement is true, then 100% neutrons would never break apart since there is no positive force (protons) pushing the apart, and, only neutrons with the strong force keeping them together. Something is clearly missing there 🤷
You are correct
Nope. That is exactly what a Neutron star is.
@@dziprick3204 No, that is not exactly what a neutron star is. A neutron star is stable because of the immense gravitational field it has.
@@kkolxasram What creates the gravitational field? The mass of the neutrons. A neutron start is the densest material in the universe as there is no space between the neutrons. If the start was larger, the immense gravitation from this dense material 'crushes' it into a black hole. A neutron start core is what happens when there is not quite enough mass to create a black hole.
@@kkolxasram Do you know what the four forces are, their relative strengths, and the distances they work on???
❤ Very good 👍🏼
Gee, if our ideas are in error it could stall progress for say, 100 more years
Nice 👍
At 19:00 you mention the virtual photon concept. I’m not convinced that this is anything other than a construct of the underlying EM field model wherein we already know the available exchange energy is quantised. It is incorrect to define a photon as a propagating particle - that can eg be exchanged or sent out to mediate the EM force. In the EM wave model there is no net propagation of anything in the direction of propagation other than the energy and/or phase of the wave. The actual motion (of the oscillating charge carrier) occurs perpendicular to the propagation of the wave - that’s the only thing that is moving but there is no net transit of the charge either. The photon is just a reminder that energy exchanges of light with matter are in digitised chunks rather than via an analog mechanism. The sooner we can debunk the virtual photon exchange model the sooner we can advance.
Thank you sir
Dussehra is celebrated in India as a day of victory. In Treta Yuga, it marked Rama’s victory over Ravana, and in Dwapara Yuga, it symbolized the Pandavas' triumph over the Kauravas, known as the victory of righteousness (Dharma) over unrighteousness (Adharma). In today's Kaliyuga, the distinction between Dharma and Adharma is understood by the common people, but not by the elite. What is considered unrighteous for developing countries is not so for developed nations.
The United Nations, created to maintain peace, is becoming ineffective because the definition of Dharma and Adharma has faded between rich and poor nations.
However, if we delve deeper, we realize that the understanding of the universe (Brahmand) and civilization (quantum) regarding Dharma and Adharma has been clear in every era.
Today's dominant civilizations-believers (Jews, Parsis, Christians, Muslims, Sanatanis: Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs), atheists (mechanistic scientists, Marxists), and both (woke)-understand the distinction between Dharma and Adharma but do not apply it in practice. As a result, this distinction has shifted from the civilizational level to the individual level.
In the upcoming artificial era (AI), it will be difficult to save civilizations, but it will be easier to save individuals. Why?
Every individual is fighting within themselves. This struggle is between their understanding (logic) and emotions, both connected to the past. However, the individual also desires to connect with the future they wish to reach. Now, people no longer just want to live; they want to understand life. They are recognizing the Dharma and Adharma within themselves.
Thus, every civilization has focused on individual freedom. Civilization transcends nations and politics, connecting people on a global level. If civilization today is quantum, then individuals are like genes, passing their traits from one generation to the next.
On this Dussehra, we can all pledge as citizens to pass on the virtues of our civilization to the next generation, ensuring the survival and continuity of humanity and the universe.
As Ghalib once said, "When it was time to cry, we all laughed, and now when it’s time to make others laugh, why make them cry?" Let’s raise the flag of Dharma’s victory and make peace with the Adharma within ourselves.
If we’ve never isolated a quark, how can we know they exist? How can we know we don’t simply have protons and neutrons mischaracterized, and that the “strange observations” I’m sure there must have been about nucleic particles aren’t explained by well-described and never-seen phantasms?
If you reconsider Kelvin, the crossings of knots are very analogous to quarks, but with less hand waving
That's like saying "If we've never gone to the sun, how do we know it exists?",
@@bitonic589 terrible rationale there
@@davidsaintjohn4248 not if there's tons of evidence for quarks; as there is for the Sun being there; or for protons and neutrons existing, for that matter.
From my ignorant viewpoint it just seemed like protons and neutrons behave in ways which wouldn't be expected of single packets of energy, or at least, behavior which hadn't been explained in terms of "one object with certain modes" and quarks and other never-seen particles were created/noticed as mathematical patterns which fit the anomalies.
Is decay associated with the position and randomness of protons and neutrons so that if too many or too few are in one volume or quadrant, then it's now unstable?
Correction, neutrons are not stable outside of the nucleus of an atom. They have a half life of just over 10 minutes and decay into a proton, electron, and neutrino.
This is an Oscar-winning 24 minutes explanation of the Atom itself to the best of human knowledge.
You are a very good teacher.
I believe that what you taught is some fraction of what can be discovered, the quarks is a good name given by the scientist.
This will explode on final day, when with this much knowledge, you do not believe that Almighty is one and capable, death is certain yet not believing that Almighty is superior. What Almighty ordered us to read, discover and praises Him for His Holiness.
He doesn't need us but do we really don't need Him ?
A person if he is born and is normal can have everything like you, teacher who gain so much knowledge and today i am appreciating along all others mean
think of it in term of 3-body motion in the atom and proton and neutron.... chaotic states, hence fuzziness, hence uncertainty principle..... hence quantum mechanic
Are there configurations of protons and neutrons like the molecules of hydrocarbon (like benzene) but with gluonic forces
能量的形式最終都是電磁波，電磁波和磁場又來自帶正負電粒子的相互運動。那麼帶電粒子為什麼會運動呢？帶電粒子在空間的延伸就是電場勢（即潛在力），當帶電的兩個粒子的場勢相接觸，就會在接觸面立即發生相應的相互作用力，作用力使兩個粒子相互接近或遠離，或一直相互運動（例如電子圍繞質子），就產生電磁波和磁場現象。電磁力依其作用尺度由小到大就是：夸克禁閉、原子核的強力，原子殼層的電子軌道、原子分子鍵合力，內聚力，物質間的相互引力。而弱力則是原子核內正負電調節機制。被描述成當今的宇宙四大基本作用力。
由此可知，四大基本作用力源自正負電粒子；物質的運動和能量的產生源自場效應；場效應分為電場、磁場和引力場，是一切運動和能量的根源。不是甚麼交換信使粒子，基本粒子標準模型中的玻色子，其實就是場勢（即潛在力），相互作用力則是發生於粒子間的場效應，所謂的光子是電磁波，不是甚麼電磁相互作用力交換的虛光子。
4:41 it's not millions as per my knowledge, strong nuclear force is just 100 times stronger when compared to electromagnetic force
Why can we NOT REMOVE one protein and make a different element on the table?
You absolutely absolutely can, but they’re held in there really tightly with the strong force so the only way you can do. It is a particle accelerator to smash it and when that happens, New atoms lower on the table are created from the parent toms.
Pls how do I join your organic chemistry class?@@MathAndScience
@@MathAndScience Thank you (protons misspelled) Clear answer, as always.
The sstrong nuclear force ( or yukawa force As i refer to it) is actually repulsive at distances under 1 fm. But attractive ibside the nucleon. What is the explanation for this odd behavior?
When a proton is ejected from the nucleus, the initial repulsive electromagnetic force is around 70 newtons. 70 newtons pushing against a single proton. Insane. And then the strong force is 100 times stronger! Ludicrous.
Just because you can't explain why the atom just doesn't blow apart, simply add "strong force".
But when you see a slow decay of atoms, say "weak force".
You can't add and remove things just because it doesn't fit your idea.
You didn't explain how pion exchange works, and that's important to the topic.
Maybe a stupid question. But if neutrons have no charge but have strong nuclear force. Is it possible to have only neutron atoms? I have no knowledge in physics just interested regarding the topic. Maybe the missing matter of the universe is made of neutrons? If anyone knows the answer, I would very much appreciate your input 😊
If neutron is just a buffer, why can't nucleus construct only with neutron? Shall we all live in neutron sea? Thx
4:55 The fact that they have mass is not relevant, the remark is only confusing in this context!
They are family except when neighbours barge in.
i want to split quarks and electrons. i'm sure there are something there!
if anyone says nothing, we already were there with atoms
So the neutrons are like filler in a meatloaf, holding the meat ( protons) together. Cool.
Question, who made the CHARGE inside the atom?
Who decided that the atom WOULD have a charge?
Almighty ALLAH. The One.
Its the one true God, Allah.
no one did. this universe is one of an infinite number, all with their own values for the fundamental forces and gravity. We're just in the one that is suitable for life to evolve, how could we be in any other? It's a 100% chance game.
How do we know electron is - not the nucleus.
It’s cool
"Gravity" is NOT a force whatsoever! It's, in fact, dielectric acceleration.
BS. Gravity is curvature of spacetime.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 no such thing as "spacetime". Only the ether.
@@oldskool1977 Shut up we're not debating that here.
@paulmichaelfreedman8334 Chill, chill sunshine.
It all seems very convenient
Any nucleus can be destabilized by bombardment which Helium nucleuses. Would you describe mathematically your proposition, because when I studied nuclear physics it was an understood that we have no idea about what you call "strong nuclear force". It sounds a whole like the arguments for "strings", "dark matter", "God particles" to explain those things that have no explanation.
Can you prove that spreading out the protons with neutrons makes the nucleus stable? Are you sure you're not just repeating something that you heard somebody else say?
Are you sure it isn't the quarks in the neutrons or some other field?
This is some big dick explanations. Good job. I am looking forward to you eventually explaining time dependent density functionsl theory.
Summary of question: WE DON'T KNOW so we call it 'strong nuclear force', might as well call it strong 'dark force'. The idea that compressing a proton and electon to make a neutron just means a quark change is asinine; probably the result of tetraethel lead dumming down our physicists...
Jason, I think you might enjoy this channel:
www.youtube.com/@macrofying
Perhaps it's just CGI, but if it is, it's the best CGI I've ever seen!
Only place new elements are added to the chart is INSIDE of a sun?
A nucleus in ground state never "explodes"
Can we make atoms swell like baloon and make it big with 5 foot radius?
kind of, but the electrons, not the nucleus. It's called a "Rydberg atom". You would not see it, though, because you maybe only have a few electrons hanging around in that all 5 foot radius, nowhere near enough to scatter any light noticeably. Also that light itself would likely dissolve it, so you could not even look without destroying the atom.
I think it's because god gets his hands on some really jacked up superglue...
I thought iron not carbon is the most stable element
It gets stronger until it is outside the nucleon. Then it is weabk and actually repulsive until about 1 fm them it is strong again. Weird.
this guy will steal your wife
AHH yes , so thats why you have neutrons . thank you
Wow, pump the brakes. The names do have meaning. "Up" ("down") refer to the direction of isospin for protons (neutrons). That's really important for nuclear physics. "strange" is strange because it didn't fit the up/down scheme. charm was charming because it made strange make sense. Then gen 3, top/bottom beat out truth/beauty...but it's similar to up/down.....but really only up/down have a meaning in math/structure. The others are indeed just cute.
I learned something thank you!
Gravity is not a force.
Sorry to say but I feel disappointed with your explication of the force which binds protons and neutrons together.You go to a great length explaining strong force inside the proton and neutron but you skip quickly over the force which binds protons and neutrons as a kind of "residual " force of the strong force which somehow also binds the protons and neutrons as a side job. I think we deserve a better explanation of what is supposed to be the main topic of your presentation.
Lots of very tiny staples, super glue and sticky tape.
Imagine electron, which is currently not composed of any further blah blah. Electron is the killer here
😂😂😂 WRONG! The STRONG force is the binding energy of the atom. The energy that leaves this atomic system is the force of repulsion, that is why the atom holds together, is the force of repulsion has vacated the system in the form of electromagnetic energy. The neutron is the reduction of the electric force between atoms, it makes the atom's electric repulsion reduced and allows the atoms theoretical cross section to increase allowing for nuclear decay because of the reduction of electric repulsion. The more neutrons, the more nuclear interaction because the forces of electromagnetic repulsion are reduced. Particle accelerators analyze fragments of nuclear material, but it doesn't give information to the internal workings of the atom. The "strong" force is a potential well created by the Einstein energy equivalence. To separate the bound particles, the binding energy needs to be returned to the system.
I DO NOT LIKE THE INTRO TO THIS VIDEO... I THINK ITS CALLED THE LOGO THE TEN SECOND OR SO INTRO TO THE VIDEO
IT CHEAPENS IT MAKING IT RUN OF THE MILL
PLEASE DONT CHANGE YOUR FORMAT, IT WAS PERFECT THE WAY IT WAS
Stopped at 2:40.... Dogmatic garbage.
No way your husband 😅
24 minutes of waffle about something that can never be known.