ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- After more than two years of war in Ukraine - speculation is rife on how much military hardware Russia still has at its disposal. Open-source investigators Oryx say more than 2,500 Russian tanks have been lost since the beginning of the conflict.
Subscribe: www.youtube.co...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#russia #russiaukrainewar #ukraine
Tanks can be replaced, experienced crew's can't.
putting an experienced crew in a tank it's not about russia
Agreed, I anticipate this would be a critical, limitting factor.
Russians are always training new recruits.
Let's not forget that Russia doesn't have the same amount of factories as the Soviet Union with an army of workers.
they dont have experienced crews.. they are all dead..
Propoganda.
A lot of " tanks " shown in this report... A personnel carrier IS NOT a tank.
Oryx has photo and video evidence, geolocated, of 3139 russian MBT losses. So that's the bare minimum number we are working with, as of course not every loss has been seen on camera.
Russia now uses them in literally the same way, charge headlong towards Ukrainian lines, a BMP or MTLB blows up just as easily as a T72 if it gets hit by an FPV drone.
Oryx recorded over 12,000 all armoured loss for Russia, of those 3100 are MBT.
@@B.D.E. thats psychotic if you actually believe that those were serious losses.
@@B.D.E.Most online analysis of current russian stock of military hardware especially tanks is wrong. This is because they didn't put into consideration the huge number of originally ukrainian tanks and other military hardware that Russia captured in the early stage of the war.
Remember when Russia was running out of missiles? See how well that turned out...
They're loosing tanks because they ran out of washing machine where they get their parts! 😅
Yes, but they can buy plastic ones from his buddy in north Korea. LOL
But they have shovels still, supersonic ones also now. And they switched to fridges now for the chips.
What happened to those missiles supposedly running out?
Ran out. First there were everyday and night missile attacks, then just went down to once a week, then a random retaliatory chimpout whenever russians lost territory or got humiliated one way or another, now you don't hear about rocket attacks more often than once in months because whatever russia can produce they want to stockpile for the winter "freeze the civilians" campaign against ukrainian electric network. Sounds like a pretty much good indicator they are out of them.
Have you not heard about the Shahed drones? Russia uses like 1 missile for every 20 Shahed drone to attack civilians. They also manufacture missiles so they won't completely run out ever.
They can't run out as long as they build new ones, but the amount used got reduced quite a bit since the start despite purchases, and own manufacturing. Not even talking about the quality.
They're going to North Korea to beg for more.
where are they using missiles? they can make about 30 per month, and they are using about 30 per month.
Shovels.....remember? the Russians are fighting with shovels and they ran out of artillery shells 2 years ago🙄
He says tank then they show an IFV.
A blanket term for 'tracked military land vehicles'?
So? It’s not like there isn’t plenty of footage of Russian tanks exploding….
@@JMK948 A term already exists AFV.
Simple fools: I see tracks I say tank.
@@brunrodrigues if you are counting "not tanks" as being part of Russia's tank losses, then you are overestimating Russian tank losses.
Isn’t this the same MSM that told people 2 years ago Russia was running out of soldiers and artillery.
That was not the MSM. That was the NMSM saying what the MSM was saying, kind of what you are doing now.
They've run out of trained soldiers, the VDV were malleted early on as an example. Russia is now throwing poorly trained conscripts and meat assaults at the UKE positions, heavy losses are a result of this. Remember according to Clauswitz the attacking force needs a 3 to 1 ratio to assault a defensive force. Yes the defenders are taking casualties, but the Orcs are likely taking three times as many iaw the ratios above. In other words Putler's war of aggression is completely unsustainable for his terrorist state. 3 day SMO hahahaha
@@timphillips2902Than what happened during last summer when Ukraine launched it’s counteroffensive? Ukraine recieved hundreds of NATO tanks and armored vehicles, artillery etc. and 35-50k troops were trained by NATO yet they failed miserably… Foreign figters said that they’ve come up against “organized resistance and it was obvious from the very start that the enemy was very profssesional”… Many of these foreign fighters fled Ukraine after seeing the fierce resistance of the Russian army… Regarding “meat wave” attacks, these were carried out only by PMC Wagner comprising mostly of former inmates; according to BBC Mediazona out of 20.000 deaths recorded on the Russian side during the battle of Bakhmut, almost 90% were ex inmates…
Btw it is the VDV that is assaulting Chasov Yar as we speak, so they are still here, don’t you worry 😊
300k soldiers are gone.. most of the kolled now are inexperienced
@@flanker8724 That was millions of land mines that thwarted the Ukrainian offensive, and crucial Western equipment only started to arrive just before.
IF THERES A BIG DOOR AT THE BACK ITS NOT A TANK
Though I agree with you. The Merkava doesn't 😝
If there is a small hatch left open for drones IT IS a Russian tank :)
Maybe. But still Russia has lost plentiful of IFVs along with tanks. Still, the only way Russia's tactics could work was as long as the Ukrainians had no ammo. Russians could take Avdiivka and Severodonets because the Ukrainians had supply issues. If the Russians can't cut the Lviv-Kyiv corridor, there is little they can do.
@@meilinchan7314 The Russian Federation will grow larger :)
BTR and APC shown in the video aren't considered tanks....
Do they are running out of photos too
That's true their classed really as battle taxis and why they can swim across water but mbts can't but of course Russia doesn't know how to use them
Russia has been losing IFV's at an alarming rate as well
Their standard doctrine is 2 IFV's per tank on an assault
So even if we believe that Russia losing 60 tanks per month, it makes sense that they are losing 100+ IFV's per month
Personally, I believe that the numbers are higher
Exactly. They've been buring through those personal carriers as fast as tanks
Exactly, and Oryx is not counting IFV and APCs as tanks either, so, yes, the distinction is relevant.
2022: Russia is almost out of tanks
2023: Russia is almost out of tanks
2024: Russia is almost out of tanks
2022:Russia will have Ukraine in. two weeks.
2024:Russia still struggling against Ukraine while crying about NATO.
@@mineralwater6736 "let's ignore a nuclear super powers border concerns because we're righteous, that surely won't cause a war" - NATO, formed to prevent wars
@@murmaider2 yes because Russia setting ups weapons in Ukraine surely isn't something to worry about.
Russia have threatened with nukes in the past 3 years more than anyone in the past 20 years.
@@murmaider2Let's Realize that Stopping a Big Mouth Nuclear Superpower as Early as possible is the Only Sane Option. Or more of the Same will Continue For as Long as That Vladie Breathes.
@@murmaider2basically the base of how the war started.
Don't worry Russia is still making enough shovels
And electric bikes LOL.
And you over 31 countries together still can not beat shovels 😉this a shame for so called the most powerful cartoon army of west.
@@koordrozita7236The 30 other countries support Ukraine financially. When they send troops its over for Russia lil bro.😂
I think they have 3 days of tanks left
Apparently, they have way more fridges.
Without food in them !😢
And washing machines too
They only left with shovels 😂😂😂😂
And Golf Carts. They are attacking with golf carts. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
There are lots of shovels because they are burying so many dead Russians they cannot keep up.
@@boink800 That video was insane! They are truly crazy. They are driving straight into gunfire with motorcycles too. The notion they could ever win a war against NATO is just a joke. We outnumber already 2 to 1 in active soldiers without reserves.
God save us all
They run out of flags
There’s a big difference between a T90 and a T60 which was made in the 1960s regardless of how you refurbish it
I wonder how many of them break down due to mechanical error even before the reach the battlefield. 70 years of being parked outside does incredible damage.
Actually there is no diference to drones. The same happens against M1 and 2A6.
T-60 is a WW2 light tank made from 1942 to 1945
You are probably thinking about the T-64 main battle tank, I cannot blame you, you seem to have no idea what you are talking about so why would you know what tanks the Russians are using, they are using the same calibre gun 125mm so regardless your opinion of it, a 125mm shell is gonna cause a lot of damage whatever it hits, its better to have ANY tank than NO tank in combat.
@@SMGJohn Better to call it T 60 series than.
Modernized T62/64 er perfect mobile artillery. And the storm troopers like these.
They still have scooters and horses.
When that fails, they always have human power
Just like they were fighting with shovels. 🥴
they will probably get roller skates in 2025 😄
Crutches and wheelchairs in 2026.
Rubber knee-pads for crawling in 2027.
Crew Losses are way more of an issue than Tank losses
They’re not like driving a tractor anymore, that old out produce human sacrifice Russian method doesn’t work anymore
Russia running out of missiles, tanks n whatnot... Its getting boring...
It may be boring, but it's making the World safer, the Soviet stockpiles of MBT, IFV, BTR, munition, missile cruisers, Russia inherited are all being depleted, as are the toys Ukraine inherited, and those transferred by Hungary, Bulgaria, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Germany, Finland, ... (nations once occupied by the Soviet Union) post the 1922 Italian, 1926 Berlin, and 1939 Moscow treaties, between Germany and USSR.
If you take the Jan 31 Military Balance 2024 report, it states Russia had lost in excess of 3000 of the 4750 OPERATIONAL MBT it had at the start of 2020, to that date, Oryx shows a further 500 losses since the end of Jan. Which would suggest the inherited, functioning, stockpile is down to 1250, before you add new / re-manufactured tanks being churned out. Add the fitted diesel engines have an expected service life somewhere between 250 and 5000 hours before overhaul, depending on model, and the barrels are good for ~500 rounds, and much of the surviving fleet will need to return to be re-manufactured, as clocking up the operational hours, every day. At present rates Russia will be dependent on new / re-manufactured vehicles by mid 2025, the Soviet stockpiles then being exhausted. By the end of 2025 you'll likely only be able to find a: T-52, T-54, T-64, T-72, or T-80 in a museum, or tin-pot 3rd World Nation, ditto for Soviet IFV's.
Russia having swapped some territory with China, for material aid, and given the amount of spare Russian territory, and the size of Chinas industrial complex, this Special operation, by the geriatric fool, will continue for months, at least till after the US elections, but will drain the Soviet stockpiles, and the Russian Sovereign wealth fund, as it will the other Soviet stockpiles, to make any other Special operations, far less likely. Armour not being cheap, and taxes to pay for more, even less popular than loosing Russian males, by the hundred thousand, to fulfil the fantasy of a a cognitively declining supreme leader.
Still looking at another 4 years plus this will continue
You think they're not out of missiles? Russia has to make a stockpile for each chimpout whenever they get mad at something and it's been that way for over a year now. They're literally firing them as they make them now.
@@Elbuarto Europe alone pays Putin 3 billion euros a day... He would NOT be running out of money anytime soon, that's for sure... Remember Biden say the "Russian Ruble is rubble"... By now any person with some sense should atleast start questioning the headlines of Russia running out of this this that and that...
@@Elbuarto LOL , Russia have made more than 3 000 000 shells LOL , Russia have bigger army now than before .....
Same is true for Ukraine. Oh wait they make 0 Tanks.
True
Irrelevant. There are supplied by their allies.
@@chefchaudard3580 you wait till Russia starts receiving tanks from China.
@@chefchaudard3580 Their allies (excluding the US) do not have a lot of tanks and are not producing them in large numbers. Meanwhile Putins 500 rubles alibaba drones that I make in his cellar go boom boom and Leopard 2 kaputt.
@@pacivalmuller9333 western tanks are far superior to the old T-62s and T-54. Meaning Ukrainians don’t loose them as much as Russia does.
Russia is on the offensive, furthermore.
And there are large numbers of tanks in western countries inventories, specially the US.
And Ukraine use hundred of thousands drones and destroys about 1200 tanks every year. So I can’t see your point, here.
Don't forget that Russia is also running out of missiles. Our experts have predicted that and they are clearly always right!
You mean running out of North Korean missiles? I guess that is why putler is now in North Korea begging for more missiles. I wonder how how is he going to pay for those now that the ruble is now rubble. With a loan in yuan?
@YourHome-kt1ctyeah but the orcs are garbage fighters
Russia is not importing tanks or Missiles. They are manufacturing it. So how can they be short of it?
@@BashirAhmed-wr7lf They can't. I'm ridiculing the reporting.
@YourHome-kt1ct " Hypersonics " that the Patriot systems eat for lunch lol.
What we learned so far. This war won't be decided by tanks. In this age of drone reconnaissance, Kamikaze Drones, precise Artillerie and Rockets, Tanks have never been more vulnerable than today.
Thats wrong in my mind. What we learned so far is that They give the protection to the infantry, they make holes in the blockades, destroy machine guns and other fortified positions.
This can be replaced in part by rocket launchers and so on but not to an effective degree. Because u need too many, a BMP 1 can reload in 8 seconds while driving. This can't be beaten by rocket launchers to be used the person has to stop aim and shoot (smaller kaliber and harder to transport).
For offense, they are needed defense, not so much cause u dont need as many rocket launchers, and u dont need to transport them at all.
@@hbt739have you not seen how they've been picking off tanks one by one and if they don't pick them off they hit a mine. Same with aviation and navy, technology is reducing the effectiveness of all these to the point where we are regressing to men and trenches.
@@aldozilli1293 and if the tanks are through the kamikaze drones, artillery, rockets, minefields, there is infantry waiting with javelins and other rpg stuff. High cost weapon systems are getting taken out by way lower cost weapons. In front of our eyes the difference between being in a tank and being an a coffin is becoming marginal.
Yes it will be decided by economics. So Russia has already lost but this war will drag on for quite a few more years I'm afraid.
Drones and missiles are crucial for hitting strategic targets and disrupting enemy operations. However, you cannot advance or maintain control of territory without ground forces. Therefore, tanks and other land-based units are of paramount importance.
I am suspicious of military experts who never served in the military.
nice graph, but the million dollar question is will Ukraine able to manufacture enough soldiers to continue taking out the same amount of tanks each month?.
no troops required to be put at risk to destroy a tank with an FPV drone ....
Ukraine will definitely run out of soldiers before Russia runs out of convicts to use as cannon fodder. Authoritarian states are GREAT at producing convicts - men can be convicted on trumped up charges.
Offence to Defence on average has a ratio of 3:1 meaning on average the country on offence will have 3 casualties for every 1 defence casualties. So if Ukraine remains on defence they should have enough personnel for a long time.
@@g3air3 FPV drones have a much shorter range than artillery, even old school basic field artillery. When weather isn't ideal (frequently, in Ukraine), they have a shorter range than some tanks. You see, on the news, the clip of the drone operator in their bunker, and it seems they are safe and isolated, but it's still a risky job. They still die in combat; it's not like the fantasy of invincibility that is presented. Safer than confronting the tank with an RPG, but still a risk.
Don't worry. They have bicycles and wheelbarrows, which will be delivering shovels and laundry machines
There's no way Russia is running out of tanks. Just as an example, Iraq was in an 8 year high intensity war with Iran and lost thousands of tanks, yet by the end we had thousands more than what we started out with, and we had no production capability during all those years. So i can tell you right away the idea that Russia is running out of tanks is just laughable.
Exactly 💯
yes, because they will stop the war when they only have 1 tank left 😁
Iraq was able to purchase tanks from the Soviet Union and China
Just laughable that you think you know better
@@michaelsrensen3398 He does know better than you. He presented a solid line of reasoning and the historical juxtaposition is entirely vaild and accurate. Now go seeth about it
"Russia all out of.." Stop yourself right there, we heard this joke before. 😂
Russia takes north Korean, Iran and China weapons for the time being
@@godfreydavid6847 No different than Isreal taking US weapons to target toddlers. 🤣🤷♂️
Yeap
@@godfreydavid6847
Yes, they do, but they do it to balance national production, especially with heavy weapons like the short-range ballistic missiles. At the end of the day, everything that makes up the front arsenal of the Russian army (tanks, helicopters, howitzers, infantry equipment, etc.) is still manufactured in the Russian Federation,
Classis pootin fanboy right there
*Talk about Ukraine and NATO!*
What? That Ukraine should finally join?
@@nikolajsawitsch6978 they cant so long as they have territorial dispute.
Ukraine is running out of more soldiers than it makes. The current ones date back 50 or 60 years.
Yes but Ukraine is making hundreds more every month.
The fact that they now sending people with d.syndrom to the frontlines tells you everything you need to know about the status of Ukraine Military
nato is on the ground and getting destroyed
We have to start be realistic and not dream of defeat. Rather we should concentrate on peace!
Peace is not possible without victory. Ukrainians remember what life under Russian rule is like. If not, Bucha and Mariupol exist as reminders.
En victory is impossible ☺️
Russia already ran out of rockets two years ago, ever since has to fire refrigerators instead. Experts told us. Remember?
It was running out that's why it's resoughting to buying N.Korrian rubish.
The MSM have been telling people for 2 years that Russia has run out of tanks, men, artillery , planet etc. Their as trustworthy as ever….
You don't understand.
Saying that Russia had used up its stores of missiles never meant that Russia was prevented from building or buying new missiles.
I'm no tank expert but I'm pretty sure 0:35 is NOT a tank, this segment is about tanks but they showed a lot of non tanks.
Those are all tanks. They just arent main battle tanks.
@@l.h.9747 IFVs and APCs aren't tanks(in a practical sense; I'm aware of the over-broad dictionary definition); they shouldn't have represented them as such. The terminology matters; mistakes like this feed the trolls pushing the 'MSM can't be trusted' narrative.
Russia has 3x - 4x more APCs than tanks. They are a lot cheaper to build.
@@l.h.9747 No it’s not a tank
Remember when the west used to worry about the Russian bears armour sweeping through Europe? 😂
in a war scenario - this isnt a war
@@paulwalker427 this is a war or your living under a rock the size of a mountain
@@paulwalker427Oh wait, it's a 3 day SMO that's been going for almost 2.5 years now 😂😂.
Damn Russia, you broke Einstein's Theory of Relativity. 😂😂
@@gikigill788CNN came up with that 3 day 💩
They don't have the manpower nor the production capacity and technological advancement to equip the dwindling manpower that they do have. Russia is a waning empire and a far cry from the USSR.
So funny , you really believe that Russia had only 3000 thousand tanks at the start of battle with Ukraine?
While on the other hand it produces more than 1500 tanks annually, suppose it loses 16 tanks per month as you calculated it becomes almost 200 hundred tanks per year while it produces 1500 hundred ...
China has lots of electric scooters.
Meh ok… their line isn’t moving backwards lets not get ahead of ourselves.
Doesn't need to move backwards if they're continuing to attrit.
@@guydreamr “attrit”? I dont know this word.
@@-Nobody-1 Well then - allow me to enlighten you: "Attrit: wear down or weaken (an opponent or enemy) by means of sustained action. 'his defense was designed to attrit us.' That's from Oxford Dictionary. Any more questions?
Yet for some reason it's Ukraine that kidnaps people from the streets and throws them at Russians without training. Time is against Ukraine, with every Russian assault they have less and less manpower. @@guydreamr
@@guydreamr Why are you so sassy lmao.
That's why tanks modernization is important as aircraft fighters and warships modernization.
One thing is tanks, other is armoured vehicles. They have many but maaaaaany of those. Also this is like when western media stated more than a year ago that Russia was running out of ammo
And running out of missiles. They don't ask, "how many tanks does Ukraine produce?" Because the slow trickle (most of which is obsolete garbage like the Leopard 1 from the 1950s, to pad numbers hoping viewers/voters will confuse it with the much better, decades-newer Leopard 2) of tanks from the west, usually delivered months or up to a year after promised, cannot compete with Russia's production, even if Russia's production is at a lower rate than their losses. If they are still making tanks they can always continue the war, just with less intensity of tank fighting.
No. Not really
Tanks loss? Trained crew is more important. Tanks can easy be replaced from stocks. But a trained crew,take long time to train....
so look Ivan, press this pedal to move forward, you won't need to move backwards so don't bother, you don't need to stir either, because you might accidentally get around the enemy mine, and don't shoot, a tank must remain fully loaded for a better firework, now get in Ivan, your Marussia has been waiting for a new Lada and a sack of potatoes for 2 days now, don't make her suffer in waiting
Jesus, at this point your comment might be actually how they "train" new troops@@skiddzjust1389
lol the whole point of the video is showing the numbers that they cannot be easily replaced and ruSSia is currently losing more than they are producing.
Vast majority of these tank losses include survived crew. It's quite rare for entire crew to get wiped out.
@@skiddzjust1389 nothing you said makes sense
Russia uses flying washing machine and shovel not tanks.
Imagine losing a war. U started because u are losing a war
If you think Russia will run out of tanks before Ukraine runs out of infantry, you are childishly delusional
They have enough shovels and washings machines to cont'd the war.. So no problemo..
What? Russia ran out of tanks two years ago. What are you talking about again?
They are using 40 year old tanks now.
Caution. A lot of guesswork regarding tank numbers, production, modification, etc Remember back in late 2022 many 'experts were 'confident that Russia would soon be out of ammo.
Your math is way off they had 12,800 pre war 3000 worked. They have been fixing up old tanks and building new ones I think 200 a month but they have lost as high as 8000. Some of the tanks are unsalvageable or cannibalized for parts.
Tell me you listen to biden without telling me you listen to biden💀. Russia still advances.
source of the numbers: just trust me bro
In August 2022 they said the same thing... and today Russia continues to gain territory
Gain territory? Weird how most of there gains were from 2022, but apparently they are gaining..
After the new weapons package from the west and the United States over a month ago, Ruzzia is actually losing territory, losing weapon systems, tanks, personnel carriers, aircrafts and other equipment at an alarming rate
@@TFNARMY_2009 What would you call the act of conquering various areas, like Bakhmut and Robotyne? Wouldn't that be gaining territory?
@@marcosmercado9242 I mean look at the amount of territory Russia had conquered in 2022 compared to 2024, seems like a downgrade in territory to me sir. 🤷🏻♂️
@@TFNARMY_2009 In that regard I totally agree
Yes, they're running out of tanks, this has been happening since the beginning
That's how running out works. You make less than what you lose.
Russia has been running low on tanks for the past year.
Poo-tin would conquer Kiev and the Ukraine in two weeks and two years later poo-tin's military super power is bogged down.
Journalists not being able - again- to distinguish a tank from an armored troop carrier. 🙄
wait a min, isn't they say russia running out of everything a year ago
And a year before that...
It seems like you are making the same mistake of underestimating russian production capability. Remember what happened in WW2
Yeah we remember what happened in WW2, Germany was about to wipe the floor with the soviets (of which the majority of the victims were ukrainians dying for russians by the way) and Stalin had to beg the USA to provide them with a 11 billions lend lease (worth about 148 billion usd today) to push the germans back.
Soviet production. Two very different countries. One had almost double the population.
Yes, SOVIET production in ww2. Also ww2 era tanks were much simpler technology and had simpler, local supply chains. Modern tanks need modern technologies (optics, for example) that russia used to purchase from western countries. They no longer have access to these due to sanctions. The current situation is not comparable to ww2
Yeah, I remember the US giving hundreds of thousands of vehicles of all types, and millions of tons of materials to the USSR so they can actually win on their front.
@layneparler7408 95% of the production was on presentday Russia. Also Russia gets manpower from not just Russia. But well.
Nonsense
Yes but do they still have shovels???
Putin: "Hey guys, let's look at the bright side, we're going to be the #1 producer of cast iron utensils after all of this mess"
Russia destroyed the tanks Germany sent to Ukraine and DW News are mad about it. Hence, this video.
Majority of Leopards are still working around the front lines. What are you talking about?
@@akselmani , where did you get this false info from? Zelenski himself?
Beep beep, TROLL DETECTED
@@AstroSardaukar Where do you get your argumentation logic? The kindergartner?
You know this is the most well documented war in history right? It's not that hard to see the tanks which are used in skirmishes at the moment clown-boy.
These sort of reports are hilarious, like a full blind person judging a person with temporary eyesight loss
Western media also said the same thing abt Russian missiles running out within one year of war and that was in 2022😂😂
As a latinamerican is clear to see that putin war was a mistake. Dont you see the same cause is obvious to this side of the World
The prediction happened that russia would run out pretty much happened. Of course "running out" doesnt mean that nothing is in storage or that russia cant ever fire another missile in the war because they get continuesly produced, bought and basically never fully used up to make shure some are left just in case. Running out of something in a war more or less means that the current consumption cant be sustained and has to be reduced and that pretty much happened. Russias missile bombardment is pretty much gone in comparison to the beginning of the war.
@@l.h.9747 На украине уже бомбить нечего. основная инфраструктура вся разбита. Осталось разбить живую силу. А так, за одну ночь киев ракетами мы можем стереть с лица земли. Проблема только в том, что там обычные мирные люди живут, которых отлавливают на улицах и насильно отправляют воевать. Поэтому многие убежали из украины в европу. К тому-же, на украине проблемы, большие проблемы с электроэнергией. Ее практически нет.
Even Pope wanted peace in Ukraine, but people are becoming poor in Ukraine, Europe and all over the world because of the dreamer Zelensky, who promises peace to the people and says that he will cancel the elections and win, and wants more money, weapons and soldiers every day, and expects Ukraine, which is not a member of NATO, to be protected by NATO. Russia never talked about attacking NATO or European countries. NATO defense cooperation. NATO protects its lands and aiding non-NATO countries is nonsense. Only some NATO countries cannot speak on behalf of all NATO. If some NATO countries want to go to war with Russia without a NATO joint decision, other NATO countries are not obliged to support the war. Ukraine can never win because Russia has mercenaries and weapons to continue the war for another ten years, but Ukraine cannot resist even for a year without support.
You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain
The West produces 20 tanks per month, Russia produces 100
It's more than 100...
More than 3 years they've been running out of tanks based on reports. 😂
Nope
is this an expert? She forgets that Ukraine is ramping up the number of FPV's so that tanks will be obsolete!
I don't believe, so many gains for Ukraine, yet they lost ground on a large scale. how come
Wait wht they claim this 2year ago.. how come it happen again?
I thought have been war with shovel all the while😂
they ran out of tanks, and now they're running out of tanks again... keep up man.. xd
Putin is begging Kim for help.
@@senka1914 Why do you think Putin is in North Korea? How desperate he is?
@@zhangyiping100 let him beg, get the mission done
@@zhangyiping100if south korea can help Ukraine so why can't Putin help North Korea 😂😂😂
A few months ago, their production rate of T-90M began to exceed the rate of refurbishing T-72B3M; they were up to 100 T-90Ms per month. It isn't just the numbers; like any country their industry adapts. Tanks built in 2023 don't have the same anti-drone features as tanks built in 2024. The T-72B3M knocked out an Abrams last month. Just last week we saw a T-90M take a Javelin hit and keep going on like nothing happened. Tanks will never be a problem for RU in this war...
Russia running out tanks and using shovel..
But why they still gain teritory?
They’re not… that’s old news when the west stopped supplying Ukraine with weapons. But now that Ukraine is receiving weapons from the west again, ruzzia is losing ground, losing troops and losing battles
@Cyber-Bully Thats a big lie, bot. I mean lol
@@Kerorhavbc777 it’s absolutely true. Seems you have a problem with the truth. I’m American and TH-cam is an American platform… guess who the bot is? 🫵🏼
@@Cyber-BuIIy According to which map? I'm asking genuinely since all maps are reporting the recent losses of Netailove, Vovchansk, Klischiivka, etc.
Nobody believes Russia is losing.....nobody.
*The age of the tank is OVER! Even Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and Philippines are mostly investing in MANPADS these days.*
They say tanks were already obsolete in 1918 because of anti-tank rifle and artillery. They say tanks were obsolete in early 1940 because of anti-tank artillery. Tanks aren't going to be obsolete, tactics of using it will be
@@CCP-Dissident *The best idea I have seen yet at the Dubai arms show was a solid cast concrete tank made in India. The fill material was Aluminum oxide balls (Ruby) of all sizes from 1MM ot 30MM with 30 layers of AR500 steel wire mess for support. The tank was ligher than steel tanks and shaped charged proof due to rapid cooling of "HEAT' copper jets on ceramic and half the cost of all other 120MM bore tanks in its class!*
What happened to German tanks in Ukraine 😂
And the mighty Abrams super duper invincible tank. 30 idle ones still remain.
Hey DW, really ? Do you think it's 2022? You're still repeating the same thing for 2 years...
Actually, Oryx said Russia had lost 3,000 tanks as of early May. Is this an old story that DW is recycling?
If you want better information on Russian tanks in storage, YT channel Covert Cabal has multiple videos on that.
....the experienced, trained cews, the crews are the crux, not the tanks....
Unfortunately, they have a heck of a lot more people than us (Ukraine). And we do not produce any tanks at the moment, just getting a slow trickle from the west...a year for 14 challengers, or 31 Abrams, none of which perform as well as the media claimed. I don't think trying to match them, pound for pound, and seeing who runs out of people and stuff first will work but DW cannot think of better strategies.
Let's see how Russia deals with fighting a tank war without Lend Lease.
Soviet Union produced more tanks then whole of Europe+Lend Lease together. So why should Russia care? Meanwhile this is not even a tank war...
Maybe we'll get to see how good North Korea's tanks are before the war in Ukraine is over
Lend Lease did not provide tanks. Lorries, those were helpful.
@@glebarhangelsky4351Yes it did. Many Shermans ended up in russia during ww2
@lyneparker7408 mainly were not used. USSR had like 50 times more weapons than lend and lease when the war ended, proving that it was not vital.
*Remember how you reported Russia is running out of ammo 2022?*
Thats why Russia had to buy ammo from North Korea. Most of North Koreas tanks are T55/T62 types, if Russia is interested.
@@zedeyejoe now russia has more ammo than ukraine. 5 to 1 according to ukraine officials
@@AlexWolfM In production or in store?
Russia had 20m rounds in store, now down to 3m (and that was a couple of months ago).
Russia now has to trade with North Korea for more ammo.
@@zedeyejoe citation needed
@@zedeyejoe it was said by zelensky.
5 to 1 in a Frontline
Yes. They also ran out of missiles 10 months ago.
Russia can afford to lose 6 to 8 tanks a day. But Western can't afford to lose 3 tanks a day. So who would finish tanks first?
Well Ukraine now has more active tanks than Russia does. Sadly they are still mostly the old Russian models but as you know, any tank is better than no tank.
@@zedeyejoethe greatest donor of tanks to Ukraine by far was Poland with 326. The US sent only 31. How do Ukrainians have more active tanks than Russia? You're not making sense.
@@mugenmugen9632 No the greatest foreign donor of tanks to Ukraine is Russia. Over 500 Russian tanks captured.
Why is the Russian tank force (and artillery) reducing, because Russia is losing more than it can replace. Even just taking tanks/guns out of storage takes time.
Of course Russia could reduce its losses by not attacking but they are not doing that.
Russia has thrown away its initial advantage over Ukraine, numerical superiority.
Interestingly expert doesn't mention quality of both tanks and crews. Loosing T90 with relatively well trained crew and getting in it's place old refurbished 50y.o. T55 with crew that barely knows how to drive it is like... I lost Porsche 911 but I have Fiat Seicento so no change.
Fun fact, the data used in this video is old. It's no longer 2.5k or 2.6k lost tanks on Russia's part, it's 3,139 *confirmed* losses (3139, of which destroyed: 2119, damaged: 157, abandoned: 347, captured: 516).
You left out the wash machines they were taking apart. Talk about laundry! They can't wash clothes!
The Russians tried stealing all the washers in Ukraine, but couldn't find a way to ship back home.
Dw today: Russia running out of tanks
Dwtommorow:Russia has manufactured more than 2000 new tanks 😂
…with ancient optics.
@@agn855 How many does Ukraine manufacture? How many modern tanks (not the 1950s Leopard 1s, which the media seems to hope its viewers will confuse with the much better Leopard 2s) are given to Ukraine? We wait a year for 30 Abrams, 14 Challengers or a few tens of Leopard 2s, which have proven not to be the miraculous wonder weapons which the 'experts' on TV claimed. Meanwhile, Russia produces circa 100 tanks a month. Multiply that by 12. Attrition doesn't favour us.
Russia has refurbished old tanks because it is easier than building new ones. Estimates are it is building about 30-40 modern tanks a month while losing hundreds. Production can't keep up with attrition.
@@WangMingGe tanks have proven to be obsolete in this war of attrition. Ukraine simply does not need tanks.
A high proportion of the video footage does not show tanks. Can you trust a report where the journalists can’t identify what they are talking about.
2003: We need one more year to secure Afghanistan's future... 2022: We need one more year to secure Afghanistan's future...
2024: We need one more year to secure Ukraine's future...
????: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Are we there yet?🙈🙉🙊
Current Oryx numbers of verified losses of Russia's tanks:
2119 destroyed, 157 damaged, 347 abandoned, and 516 captured
Ukraine's numbers of tank losses:
577 destroyed, 71 damaged, 65 abandoned, 134 captured.
So if you look at how many tanks Ukraine captured and add all the tanks donated or sold to them from other countries, Ukraine has a net positive of over 400 tanks. And they still are waiting on another 290 tanks to be delivered.
Let see in 3 month 😂 this western media so weird.
Last month media say Russia only use shovels 😂,..
2 YEARS ago you said they will run out of ammunition. LOL
as just a man watching with no military experience, is the tank still relevant? when you can destroy 8000 of anything in two years with 4 guys inside, seems like more of a coffin.
Its a mobile, armoured coffin, with a big gun. Yes tanks are still relevant.
@@zedeyejoe He seems to forget that people die in war.
Ok... But what's the situation on the "good guy" side? Does Ukraine even make tanks? Sometimes I think the focus on Russian losses is misleading. It's obviously only part of the story.
You know you're in trouble when you're asking North Korea for a handout.
On the contrary, when the world's sanctioned nations combine forces, the West is in serious trouble.
Trying to isolate Russia was a really dumb idea.
@@duncansmith7562we saw what happenned the last time the world’s sanctioned nations combined their forces, and they got wrecked so badly they were turned into decent countries-japan, austria, germany, and turkey. With nukes on the table occupation is not an option, so real change will have to come from the inside due to external pressure.
@@peterl3417 oh, please reveal all the sanctions imposed on Austria before the outbreak of WW2 hostilities! cue crickets.
thanks for sharing your fairy tale wish list of "real change coming from the inside".
how has that worked so far for Iran, Venezuela, N Korea, Cuba and Russia? So far, the West has a 100% record of perfect failure!
Wake up and grasp how the real world works.
Dictator homies gotta help dictator homies in severe need 😆
@@inthendwealldie neither of them is in severe need at all! It's NATO that can't figure out a way to turn things around!
More coping…….
Ukrainian Cope'ing is real rn
It's taken Russia 2.5 years to move 24 kilometers into Ukraine borders. It was supposed to take 3 days to take all of Ukraine. Keep projecting, comrade.
Stop funding war in Ukraine and get a treaty . How many billions so far ?
well so send that to putin? who started that war? who is agressor and invader?
Been hearing this since 2022. That Russia was running out of everything. Yawn…
Yes, and they are. They are using T-62's. 😂😂
@@MoeHamHead-bx7og except tanks in this conflict are being used against infantry and structures. Tank on tank battles are extremely rare. So a T-62 or M1 Abrams will be just as effective as one or another in this role
@@AHalzROFL. Yeah, the Russians are using T-62s because they want to, not because their more modern tanks have all been destroyed. In fact that's why Russia is begging starving North Korea for weapons. Sorry, one tank isn't as good as another. You might as well try to claim that the fact Russia has sustained 300,000+ casualties doesn't matter either.
@@MoeHamHead-bx7og I’m not denying that Russia lost a significant number of tanks. But there is quite a difference between losing tanks and running out of them. The narrative since 2022 is that Russia is xenophobic number of months away from running out of equipment. That isn’t happening, isn’t it?
@@AHalz You don't beg for antiquated tanks from North Korea unless you are running low on your own supply. You don't field museum pieces of your own - T-55s and T-62s - unless your supply is running low.
It's a DW desire.
They have around ~8000 left that they can refurbish based on the statistics from the 1990s. These are not technologically significant machines, just slabs of steels and a 125mm gun which is good enough for them since their weapons were being blown up before they could be utilized entirely anyway. So they could logically keep it up for 7-8 years without an increase in manufacturing. Based on all factors not just tanks, it is still expected that Russia can fight the war for at least 5 more years without significantly more support from China, Iran and North Korea.
Yep. Gotta plan to resist Russia longterm. Unfortunately, western mass media like DW is based around short news cycles, soundbites and eye-catching headlines, whereas real life events do not necessarily fit these convenient parameters.
Don't worry - the Ukrainians have the Abrams..oh, wait..
U guys really think Russia hasn’t been building their new tanks while the old ones have been getting destroyed.
I refused to call them tanks, I’ve been calling them shovels for a long time now