I am a Emacs/Portacle user... But I have heard that the situation is improving with VSCode. I cannot really talk about it now, because I have never tried it...
Well id just recommend (as another noob) to just bite the bullet really. The fastest way to set up c++/c# is visual studio. And has the most powerful features. Could you make It run in vscode? Yes but why getting a worse experience overall? The same reasoning applies to Emacs for common lisp and the best lisp-in-a-box IDE that just works out of the proverbial box is portacle. Which saves you tonnes of choices and configurations making an already steep learning curve, a bit less so. Why would you want to make your life more difficult when there is already a way? TLDR: CL is already conceptually harder to learn due to unfamiliar paradigms (almost 180° to M-expression based languages (anything ALGOL derived)). Dont make It harder than It needs to
you forgot to talk about CLASP implementation of Common Lisp, targeting LLVM to interface with C++ and compile everything to native, no interpreter and it is being used to work in chemistry for nanotechnology and design nanomachines and molecules.
Which IDE to use for Common Lisp? I really don't like emacs and its flavors.
I am a Emacs/Portacle user... But I have heard that the situation is improving with VSCode. I cannot really talk about it now, because I have never tried it...
Well id just recommend (as another noob) to just bite the bullet really.
The fastest way to set up c++/c# is visual studio. And has the most powerful features. Could you make It run in vscode? Yes but why getting a worse experience overall?
The same reasoning applies to Emacs for common lisp and the best lisp-in-a-box IDE that just works out of the proverbial box is portacle. Which saves you tonnes of choices and configurations making an already steep learning curve, a bit less so. Why would you want to make your life more difficult when there is already a way?
TLDR: CL is already conceptually harder to learn due to unfamiliar paradigms (almost 180° to M-expression based languages (anything ALGOL derived)). Dont make It harder than It needs to
Also ABCL for Common Lisp on Java...
At the moment I have little experience with it...
you forgot to talk about CLASP implementation of Common Lisp, targeting LLVM to interface with C++ and compile everything to native, no interpreter and it is being used to work in chemistry for nanotechnology and design nanomachines and molecules.
Yeah, there are a lot of interesting projects!
Parabéns!
Thanks! :)