Inverse Square Law ( Math Word Problem)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • WWW.RADTECHBOOTCAMP.COM
    Visit us for more Videos, Quizzes, and ARRT Mock exams
    This video is from our inverse square law series.
    In this video, you will see many step-by-step examples in how to perform inverse square law word problems.
    The inverse square law in a fundamental concept within radiography. Through the use of the inverse square law radiographers are able to calculate x-ray photons intensity and radiation dose.
    For more inverse square law videos, please visit us at
    WWW.RADTECHBOOTCAMP.COM

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @CloverLearning
    @CloverLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To view more video-lessons and learn more about the RadTechBootCamp
    Radiography Learning Resource, please visit www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @mandybetts6868
    @mandybetts6868 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I now finally understand the inverse square law! Very nicely explained, thank you.

  • @shebboleth
    @shebboleth ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In all examples: after the squares of the distances are calculated you MUST do the division (1600 over 3600 = 0.44) THEN you must multipy that figure by the 1.2 mGy to get the new dose = 0.44 X 0.44 = 0.53 mGy.

  • @intrepidh3084
    @intrepidh3084 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Best explanation yet! thank you, your rewording of the equation makes this much more simple to solve for in my mind.

  • @Meka775
    @Meka775 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I never leave comments on videos but here I have to say thank you! Finally an explanation I understand!!! I appreciated this video!

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great to hear! Have you checked out our website, www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @kelly208
    @kelly208 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much! This is the first video that's actually made inverse square law make sense in terms of radiology! You've saved me for my radiation physics test

    • @emmaadamson1523
      @emmaadamson1523 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s great to hear! Have you visited our website, www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @2peachyjello
    @2peachyjello ปีที่แล้ว

    The teacher cancelled the two lectures that were supposed to be covering this and now we have a test on it. (SHOCK)! Thanks for helping me so I can at least have a better chance of passing this test! :)

  • @pancho101101
    @pancho101101 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the first example where distance 1 is 72in and distance 2 is 36in the equation still works but isn’t necessary bc the inverse square law also states that if your distance is cut in half the intensity is 4 times as much and if you double the distance the intensity is 1/4. This means you can just multiply the original intensity of 0.01 mGy by 4 to get 0.04 mGy bc the distance was cut in half from 72 to 36.

  • @thelabexperts
    @thelabexperts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But the 3rd one answer was-0.19
    1 Divided by 5 =0.2
    And 0.2- 0.01 is equal to=0.19 but the answer was 0.04 How sir 🙏
    Please help to understand

  • @miketrenton
    @miketrenton 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great refresher and the "new" formula is just better!

  • @perfumetester10
    @perfumetester10 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like that you clarified that if the distance increase or decrease. Then your answer will be the opposite of distance result. BUT..... if a student did not know how to perform the calculation with the original formula, WHY would you show another formula.(that you prefer) To add confusion to an all ready confused student WHY....WHY.... add confusion on top of confused.????

  • @keffreystellway7301
    @keffreystellway7301 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video! Simple. Clear. Easy to follow.

  • @leehamilton5725
    @leehamilton5725 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much!!!! This video made the formula so much easier.

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can see more through our online learning resource. www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @saplink6411
    @saplink6411 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This may be a silly request but do u know of any videos that have a step by step on using a scientific calculator to solve radiation safety math questions.? Thank u

    • @MarioMaresSr
      @MarioMaresSr ปีที่แล้ว

      1.600÷3.600 = .44 I was having the same issue this worked

  • @gentlefistinfinity9780
    @gentlefistinfinity9780 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderfully explained. This video will help many students to better understand this concept.

  • @Leenmae10
    @Leenmae10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im a radtech students im struggling a lot with this one u make it easy thank you .

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can view more videos at www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @rodriguesroneyjoseph6113
    @rodriguesroneyjoseph6113 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is very helpful. Thank you, sir.

  • @yamahschector
    @yamahschector 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I don't get how you did your math at all. I get the squaring each number but what did you do to get your answer.

    • @keeneallanlim8608
      @keeneallanlim8608 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A big ? Brother. Same when im doing computation.

  • @nixsavage
    @nixsavage 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rockstar explanation , I hate math but this made it easy peezy

  • @alinavinodannicattu3386
    @alinavinodannicattu3386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for such a nice and simple explanation. Great job!

  • @TreyJamora1
    @TreyJamora1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    YOU ARE THE BEST, . NOW I KNOW HOW TO SOLVE THIS THING NOW!!!!!!!!!!! THANKS MAN!!!

    • @Drummer8nimation
      @Drummer8nimation 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey there, just want to ask, what are some other technical/mathematical/physics related topics do radiographers study?

  • @gregkuchinsky9788
    @gregkuchinsky9788 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a test tomorrow and definitely will help out

  • @ellennichols8851
    @ellennichols8851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These videos are so helpful, thank you!!!!

  • @mayiewawawawa5028
    @mayiewawawawa5028 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In bushong chapter 8 there’s a problem where 1.1 is squared but it is still 1.1 why is that?

  • @shaneritchie5873
    @shaneritchie5873 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dose this work, when looking for distance 2, if u sq. Root the the final answer?

    • @gospelphysics
      @gospelphysics 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct, same form for the equation, but root the final answer.

  • @GamingWimpGW360
    @GamingWimpGW360 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are such a life saver. saved me for my geology test lol

  • @orianablair1896
    @orianablair1896 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. 💖💖 omg I was gonna cry then you made everything make sense.

  • @myers5159
    @myers5159 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much this helped alot. i finally get it. i have an imaging exam monday for my radiology program. Thank you!

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to hear! You can view the more videos at www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @irav1558
    @irav1558 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU !!!!! You are way better than my professor 🙏🙏🙏

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad we could help. You can get the hundred more videos at www.radtechbootcamp.com

  • @christiancastillo618
    @christiancastillo618 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    wouldnt it be the I2 going to the other side ?? not saying its wrong or anything because I haven't had algebra in a while but just a question

  • @khaleesi248
    @khaleesi248 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much for making this video. I'm going for my radiography NDT level 2 in about a month so I"m trying to freshen up.

    • @LatifTakeAction
      @LatifTakeAction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did u pass?

    • @khaleesi248
      @khaleesi248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I did pass. Sorry for not replying sooner.

  • @july172
    @july172 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankkkkkkk youuuuu for your time!!!!

  • @brendabarrerasanders9474
    @brendabarrerasanders9474 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excelentísima explicación!

  • @miguelluna66
    @miguelluna66 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this video! Helped so much!

    • @CloverLearning
      @CloverLearning  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can purchase the full course at www.cloverleaflearning.com

  • @ashwaq.1541
    @ashwaq.1541 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation , thanks

  • @rociocrystal5780
    @rociocrystal5780 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought you need to flip the numbers. And when I did I got 0.0025 as my answer I don’t I understand why he didn’t flip them

  • @marriellesequito
    @marriellesequito 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much! I understand it so much more now!

  • @anchalrajan01
    @anchalrajan01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very well explained thank u

  • @lilianamadrigal2033
    @lilianamadrigal2033 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you this was so helpful

  • @equillanelms8101
    @equillanelms8101 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! I actually understand now

  • @hamzarabhi3150
    @hamzarabhi3150 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a video where the distance AND also the mAs changes?

    • @evakovacs7033
      @evakovacs7033 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Hamza, did you mean that? th-cam.com/video/QThaEhsq-p0/w-d-xo.html

  • @linaalsabagh2913
    @linaalsabagh2913 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    that was very useful thanx

  • @keeneallanlim8608
    @keeneallanlim8608 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to compute to get 0.04 ?

  • @Acepilot12345
    @Acepilot12345 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome thanks! Great help.

  • @saplink6411
    @saplink6411 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u so much!

  • @7rlalko
    @7rlalko 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ok i was over thinking, if dis is decreasing then the exposure increases, I always thought it was opposite, im visualizing it and over thinking. nope overthinking again dugh,

  • @jimskewers5815
    @jimskewers5815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The last problem was wrong I guess ?

  • @radiologytechnologist8190
    @radiologytechnologist8190 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Answer wrong ....but you 0.01*2=0.2