That man, Lufen, is a typical German, instead of give credits do the German women he is talking about the German penalty instead of the English penalty. It is the referes decision that counts
@@MrDekkert Stimmt alles, aber zurück zum ersten Kommentar. Ganz genau, diese Typen wie Lufen versauen einen den Spaß den Nachbericht zu schauen. Ekelhafter Schlechtmacher, leider typisch deutsch!
No way is that a penalty. She clearly kicked Russo, neither of them hitting the ball, and Russo did not affect her ability to score a goal. If anything the german player fouled Russo.
Quit it. Russo stamped the german player. The german player did not hit the ball but Russo stamped her, penalty. What happened after the german player missed the ball? Yes, Russo lowered her leg and stamped the german player. Penalty for Germany and red card for Russo it`s the right decision. But Russo did not get the red card. Lucky for her and England
@@sydneyschutzman5058 No ball knowledge if you don`t think it`s a penalty. Russo stamped the german player, penalty. The english penalty? Was it a penalty? The hand must seek the ball. In this case the ball seek the hand. In that case no english penalty
@@sydneyschutzman5058 It does not matter at all if the german player missed the ball. After she missed the ball she was stamped by Russo. Penalty without no doubt
You're wrong on both counts. First, the penalty to England was 100% hand ball. The hand was not in a "natural position" (FIFA defines this as "natural position near the body" which I usually interpret as being within ~12 inches of the waist. Most official discussions agree that any hand above the head is considered a violation of this.), which is the bar to determine whether accidental contact does not count. The ref explained this to the German player when she complained. Second, both players came in with boots in dangerous play, the English player actually DID contact the ball, whereas the German player kicked the English player, then cried about it. That should never have been awarded a penalty, particularly in such an obvious 50/50 "bang-bang" play. What's worse, the official was RIGHT THERE, so no defense IMO. That said, Bright should have been sent off in the 3rd minute for denial of goal-scoring opportunity. THAT, was a clear straight red, and she should count herself lucky that England didn't play most of this game with 10. Although, TBH, at least 2 of her misplays resulted in goals, so maybe it was actually better for Germany that she wasn't sent off. Just FYI ~30 years of officiating experience here at all levels.
@@rubi4714 No, I am right. The german player protecred her head, cheek, there are no rules against that. The arm was therefore not in an unnatural position. It is natural to protect the head. And the english player stamped the german player. Clear penalty to germany
Wunderbar ausgezeichnet. Gut spielen
One of the best matches I've watched! Thanks 👍
One of the best matches I've watched. Danke 🤩
It was good match for both teams, I think Germans played smartly .🇧🇪❤
Très beau match un grand bravo aux deux équipes 🤍🤍🤍🤍💚💚💚💚💚💚💚👍👍❤️
Philen gluk fur die deutchen fussbal frawn national manchaft " ❤ " .
Danke fürs hochladen
I LOVE YOU DEUSCHTLAND
WOW Yeah Sí.
Wunderbar!
danke
Well done Germany (German ladies). The win suits you German ladies and NOT English ladies !!!!!!!!!!
German English Dutch Frisian one family. 🤝
@@De_URO not during football matches and other tournaments
@@francisferns9528 😏
Très beau match bravo aux deux équipes 👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💚💚🤍🤍
1 co dong vien kiêm .binh luân cho đuc
Ask Horst Hrubesch to consult with the current DFB frauen Coach. Even Emma Hayes had Twila Kilgore
I wonder how much German Jess Carter knows
Not many.
Wenn gwinn leicht berührt wird vs wenn Russo richtig gefoult wird
That man, Lufen, is a typical German, instead of give credits do the German women he is talking about the German penalty instead of the English penalty. It is the referes decision that counts
It's not Lufen. Bernd Schmelzer is his name.
@@MrDekkert The man who talks to Lionel Maier is Lufen
@@eternityfreeblue6377 That you mean. That's right, it's Lufen.
But her name is Leonie, not Lionel. :)
@@MrDekkert Stimmt alles, aber zurück zum ersten Kommentar. Ganz genau, diese Typen wie Lufen versauen einen den Spaß den Nachbericht zu schauen. Ekelhafter Schlechtmacher, leider typisch deutsch!
Las manos siempre van atrás los pase der balón darlo vien fuera der al canse der contrario
international friendly match and so much audience it's not understandable thing
It's germany - england.
No way is that a penalty. She clearly kicked Russo, neither of them hitting the ball, and Russo did not affect her ability to score a goal. If anything the german player fouled Russo.
Quit it. Russo stamped the german player. The german player did not hit the ball but Russo stamped her, penalty. What happened after the german player missed the ball? Yes, Russo lowered her leg and stamped the german player. Penalty for Germany and red card for Russo it`s the right decision. But Russo did not get the red card. Lucky for her and England
Dangerous Play by Russo and she stamped the German player. Clear penalty to Germany
No way is that ever a penalty the German player kicked Russo. No ball knowledge if u think it’s a penalty.
@@sydneyschutzman5058 No ball knowledge if you don`t think it`s a penalty. Russo stamped the german player, penalty. The english penalty? Was it a penalty? The hand must seek the ball. In this case the ball seek the hand. In that case no english penalty
@@sydneyschutzman5058 It does not matter at all if the german player missed the ball. After she missed the ball she was stamped by Russo. Penalty without no doubt
You're wrong on both counts. First, the penalty to England was 100% hand ball. The hand was not in a "natural position" (FIFA defines this as "natural position near the body" which I usually interpret as being within ~12 inches of the waist. Most official discussions agree that any hand above the head is considered a violation of this.), which is the bar to determine whether accidental contact does not count. The ref explained this to the German player when she complained. Second, both players came in with boots in dangerous play, the English player actually DID contact the ball, whereas the German player kicked the English player, then cried about it. That should never have been awarded a penalty, particularly in such an obvious 50/50 "bang-bang" play. What's worse, the official was RIGHT THERE, so no defense IMO.
That said, Bright should have been sent off in the 3rd minute for denial of goal-scoring opportunity. THAT, was a clear straight red, and she should count herself lucky that England didn't play most of this game with 10. Although, TBH, at least 2 of her misplays resulted in goals, so maybe it was actually better for Germany that she wasn't sent off.
Just FYI ~30 years of officiating experience here at all levels.
@@rubi4714 No, I am right. The german player protecred her head, cheek, there are no rules against that. The arm was therefore not in an unnatural position. It is natural to protect the head. And the english player stamped the german player. Clear penalty to germany
Cometen herores pierden q no se pueden cometer
That was not a penalty
Correct, England should not have a penalty. Germany`s was a penalty
Las manos siempre van atrás los pase der balón darlo vien fuera der al canse der contrario
Las manos siempre van atrás los pase der balón darlo vien fuera der al canse der contrario