Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 WR LM Review (compared to the original 23mm F1.4 R)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 216

  • @balboa0621
    @balboa0621 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Jordan loves that “go down the hill and I’ll stay up here” shot.

  • @SF-MCMLXVII
    @SF-MCMLXVII 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Just bought the original Fuji 23mm 1.4 and this is a great lens. Images are fantastic and they have character. Really can’t understand some of the negative comments about this lens. Also some great deals now on these original Fuji lenses which is a bonus.

  • @bearbearingston7696
    @bearbearingston7696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    That bitter lemon smile Chris does when talking about the 35mm focal length is hilarious

  • @WestEpicVisuals
    @WestEpicVisuals 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Came for the lens review, stayed for the ever changing and unique measurement scales

  • @unluckyraven101
    @unluckyraven101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Finally!!! I’ve heard so much about the 33mm but it’s about damn time I get to hear more about the 23mm because this actually interests me!

  • @benjones8977
    @benjones8977 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I bought the 18 1.4 linear motor instead, as it’s so sharp I can crop if need be and it makes for more scene options at a wider 27 mm view.

  • @hankroest6836
    @hankroest6836 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Just spent another 5 days in Calgary (3rd trip). It really is great there! Bombed around a bit on a scooter, looking out for you guys, and enjoyed loads of sunshine and pleasantness. It was fun spotting locations from so many of your videos. Couldn't find any puddles though - too much sun!

    • @E4xtream
      @E4xtream 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They use portable puddles for their location shoots. Patent pending.

  • @trym2121
    @trym2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Wow, Chris is looking forward on testing Viltrox 23mm. That's an improvement.
    I really look forward seeing your reaction after seeing purple fringing in Viltrox's trio

    • @kylosalvesen
      @kylosalvesen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I feel like Jordan might be pointing a gun at him to get him to say that line

    • @niccollsvideo
      @niccollsvideo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I'm happy to play with Viltrox. Always have been. We've just never had an in with the supplier to try out their gear, but we are working on it.

    • @mateuszantkiewicz2616
      @mateuszantkiewicz2616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@niccollsvideo Love that!

    • @TungstenOvergaard
      @TungstenOvergaard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Purple fringing in that trio makes them almost unusable. The 85mm 1.8 is the only one decent, in my opinion.

    • @AnzelLmao
      @AnzelLmao 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      one thing i loved about the viltrox's 23mm is the autofocus pull- its damn good for video imo

  • @nielskersic328
    @nielskersic328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I really like the new sharpness test! Makes it a lot easier to see and compare performance between lenses

  • @martibartolome9472
    @martibartolome9472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    would love to see a head to head comparison between the new fuji primes (and maybe some of old ones) but compared to the Viltrox line

  • @tuquanvinh
    @tuquanvinh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In latest body models of Fujifilm, you can go to menu - settings - button/dial and adjust the speed of manual focus (focus ring operation) from linear to non-linear, that'll solve the problem.

  • @stinkystealthysloth
    @stinkystealthysloth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I used to love the old Fuji 23mm 1.4, paired it with a short tele. Not a big fan of that focal anymore though, more into 35 + 16 pairing nowadays.

  • @jeffgoldberg1590
    @jeffgoldberg1590 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for reviewing Fuji's new 23mm WR lens, and for your reviews of other Fuji products -- I find them very useful. I've ordered the 23mm WR lens and look forward to using it.

  • @bunmeng007
    @bunmeng007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh boy I'm first. Been waiting for your review since the X Summit announcement of this new len. I love my 35mmF2 though :) and looking for 23mm. The new 23mmF1.4 is huge!

  • @vantablack4500
    @vantablack4500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dying to see your Viltrox review, as the price difference is substantial

  • @AlexandraStarr1974
    @AlexandraStarr1974 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Gotta love all this gorgeous Fuji content coming from DPRTV recently, keep em coming =)
    Actually think now is a good time for me to upgrade from my beloved fuji x-e2, owned it donkeys years now, and while it still works, more resolution would be nice but I have no idea what fuji to go with next, the x-s10 and x-t30 are both looking like viable options right now though, along with their 50mm f2 lens, should be a nice little set up for my portrait work!

    • @mgurmgur2
      @mgurmgur2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      X-S10 is amazing - small(ish), super comfortable grip, amazing IBIS, custom settings C1-C4.. Love mine!

    • @MottiWolkenbruch
      @MottiWolkenbruch 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mgurmgur2 I agree!

    • @komali2
      @komali2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I jumped from an xe2 i used for like, 4 years, into an xt5, and it was night and day lmao. Reignited how much i love photography.

  • @leovanlierop4580
    @leovanlierop4580 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 6:35 the threads on the leafs (of the corner sharpness) are better on the older lens. So glad I have the older one.

  • @TheFrankm3
    @TheFrankm3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Going back through some of my old photos, the original 23mm has taken some of my best shots. For my tastes, it’s really not that slow and is incredibly sharp. Close focus is a bit of a let down, but that’s it. One of Fuji best lenses. Still great they are remaking so many, as the originals drop in price - so others can enjoy the optics that made Fuji so well loved.

    • @andychandler3992
      @andychandler3992 ปีที่แล้ว

      Older lenses have that certain "it" factor you can't really describe. I think a lot of the newer lenses tend to be almost... too sharp?... if I can call it that. Sort of takes some of the artistic mystic of the image out of the picture (literally).

    • @SiddhantParkar
      @SiddhantParkar ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andychandler3992yup. The old ones have beautiful imperfections which make photos look filmic. The new ones are clinical like Sony

    • @lachlanhempell
      @lachlanhempell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andychandler3992 yeah those older ones have their own unique look. I think theres a quote from sigmas ceo I think, saying its easier to make a sharp lens then one with character

  • @Elazarko
    @Elazarko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What ARE Chris's favorite focal lengths?

    • @jesperandersen3354
      @jesperandersen3354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      50mm focal length.

    • @cdriper
      @cdriper 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      28 mm for wide angle

    • @niccollsvideo
      @niccollsvideo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I do love 28mm and 85mm. Those would be my go to. If I was forced to use only one the rest of my life, I'd probably stick to a 60mm.

  • @baynoyan
    @baynoyan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    23mm 1.4 Fuji and Viltrox comparison video coming?

  • @KJAYG
    @KJAYG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video looks amazing!

  • @Aksunkuvat
    @Aksunkuvat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the sharpness chart tests :)

  • @andytee88
    @andytee88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This episode was shot on WHAT CAMERA?! lol

  • @cosmoinstant
    @cosmoinstant 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Older one looks nicer. Fits Fuji style better IMO

    • @xevious4142
      @xevious4142 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not weather sealed though unfortunately

    • @vladimirk9722
      @vladimirk9722 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Да, но технически значительно лучше LM WR.

  • @zupperm
    @zupperm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What do you use for fill lights in shots like 4:55?

    • @thatjordandrake
      @thatjordandrake 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just a 42" white reflector.

    • @MichaelRichards983
      @MichaelRichards983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thatjordandrake Can you say what camera was used to film the video?

    • @dpreview
      @dpreview  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MichaelRichards983 No.

    • @szain2
      @szain2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MichaelRichards983 ​ It was BS1H, they revealed it in BS1H's review on it's announcement day.

  • @EddieInzauto
    @EddieInzauto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That natural rim lighting at 4:47. 👌🏼

  • @MichaelRichards983
    @MichaelRichards983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Video looked great! What was this filmed on?

    • @schimaere
      @schimaere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe a new camera they are not allowed to disclose? That they did not say which camera was used is suspicious. 🤔

    • @jlwilliams
      @jlwilliams 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe they just thought we wouldn't notice. Hah!

    • @MichaelRichards983
      @MichaelRichards983 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schimaere That's what I'm thinking......anyone want to guess as to what it is? GH6? Nikon.....whatever they are calling it?

    • @GuidoGautsch
      @GuidoGautsch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MichaelRichards983 there's a new flagship Fuji X coming out...could be a preprod model?

    • @AXYZE
      @AXYZE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Panasonic BS1H, your comment is on that recent video ;)

  • @erwinmalimban2197
    @erwinmalimban2197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wish Sigma makes one for APSCs

  • @JaredBishopFilms
    @JaredBishopFilms 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I appreciate the new rule! For the millions of us that love 35mm it's nice to have less whining 🤓

    • @xsh4n400
      @xsh4n400 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it's a great compromise, because there's also people like me who love how much personality they inject into their videos, and we're here for the humor.

  • @ignorance_is_strenght
    @ignorance_is_strenght 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    58mm Filter size is Common for Primes - but not with the Fujifilm System. Only the 33 and the 14 have those, Chris.

    • @martinjg3662
      @martinjg3662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't.forget the 18-55 kit lens! 😬 Even though it's a zoom...

    • @tomleo4670
      @tomleo4670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@martinjg3662 yep, plus the xf 14mm, which I carry around along the 18-55mm 🙂

  • @Hansinho10
    @Hansinho10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It would be interesting to do a review of this lens with the new Fujifilm cameras with the 40 megapixel sensor.

  • @skaputinifrablou
    @skaputinifrablou 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Don't mention the camera used to film this episode... R3, I guess?

    • @MichaelRichards983
      @MichaelRichards983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was wondering that as well; the quality was better than normal

    • @concretely
      @concretely 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bump, would love to know as well, I also noticed the difference in quality (or maybe it's just the fall colours and light)

    • @perilthecat
      @perilthecat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Turns out it’s the Panasonic BS1H. So, the exact same camera and lens combo as usual, except rehoused in a different body without IBIS.

    • @skaputinifrablou
      @skaputinifrablou 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I was psychologically tricked only because they didn't mention the camera. I wonder how influenced I am every time something new appears...

  • @lfc7805
    @lfc7805 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does this lens compare with the 18mm F1.4 in terms of image quality?

  • @Nayson
    @Nayson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What were those weird units of measurements you used for weight? My brain only works in fractions of a Noct so I’m stumped with the numbers quoted in this video.

  • @glen-draketoolworks7186
    @glen-draketoolworks7186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please say what camera and lens was being used for this post. The color and detail is impressive.

  • @aditya_gupta
    @aditya_gupta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What did you use to record this video? Excellent quality

  • @oppos727
    @oppos727 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I’ve been super satisfied with the pleb-level Fujicron 23/2 on my X-Pro 3. Wish there was a way to justify the premium on this big boy.

  • @JohnJHPark
    @JohnJHPark 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:34 Is the new lens suffrering from vignetting here (at wide-opened)?

  • @boyansyarov8136
    @boyansyarov8136 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Chris, you failed to mention the xf23 f/2 as an option. We often shoot stepped down anyway. Surprised given how much you love that focal length.

    • @stefandesu
      @stefandesu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been looking into a 23mm F1.4 for shooting b-roll with lots of bokeh and also for low light situations. Do you think the F2 variant would be sufficient for that as well? I like that it's way smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the F1.4.

    • @laneferal6756
      @laneferal6756 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stefandesu f2 is a no go for low light

  • @pedrorainha6123
    @pedrorainha6123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey... How do this new lenses perform in a camera like the XPro 1?...Will you make a video on it?

  • @itsmrjack_
    @itsmrjack_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Another thoroughly useful (and at the very least mildly entertaining ;) review. In particular it is helpful, even if frustrating, to hear of the poor manual focus feel on this and the other new LM Fuji lenses. This is a super important point you guys have raised. However I don't shoot video at all yet it is the fact that I am a landscape photographer, with my XT4 permanently switched to manual focus mode, that makes this such a deal breaker - maybe you could mention this alongside your comments regarding videography/manual focus?!

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is manual focus for landscape photography important? Pretty much all landscapes are shot at f/8 or f/11 right? Wouldn't everything in infinity be in focus regardless of manual of AF-S?

    • @itsmrjack_
      @itsmrjack_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@professionalpotato4764 yes often a landscape shot is taken at infinity, but the exact infinity focus point on a lens can change due to temperature and pressure differences, so it is usually wise to check manually. However, more pertinently for my work, I do also take plenty of 'landscape' shots at closer range, i.e. not at infinity. For these kinds of shots the object in focus may be a part of a tree or other foliage that is hard to isolate using autofocus, but very easy using manual focus with magnification. The jumpy manual focus feel of some autofocus lenses is a royal pain in the *** for these kinds of situations. Sanity check: I know that I am not the only photographer who often shoots in this way ;)

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@itsmrjack_ Ahhh I see, that's interesting to learn about. And yes I do agree that regardless of use case, lenses with jumpy manual focus rings are a massive pain. I kinda wish lenses these days had a mechanically coupled ring instead of focus by wire.

  • @AbbasBinYounas
    @AbbasBinYounas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautifully unreal colours all around you guys 😍

  • @martysender5539
    @martysender5539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what was this video shot on? S1H? inquiring minds want to know Marty Sender You Tube

  • @RIH-UNAP
    @RIH-UNAP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Chris. I am going to Joshua Tree in early November and so wanted to take the 23mm 1.4 with me but it is not released until the end of the month. I was almost ready to buy the older version but I am now sold on waiting.

  • @EddieInzauto
    @EddieInzauto ปีที่แล้ว

    What was this video shot on? Also the XF23mmf1.4RLMWR?

  • @future62
    @future62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What did you guys film this on... the colors are popping

  • @DickVanPaiton
    @DickVanPaiton 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you mix up the pictures? At f2.8 in the corner the old one looks quite a significantly sharper to me!?

  • @sebastiaanvanwater
    @sebastiaanvanwater 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm not interested in APSC systems, but I do appreciate that Fuji is bothering to update many of their older lenses.
    Olympus/OMD could follow this example... :)

    • @trym2121
      @trym2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      don't hope too much on the new owner

  • @drewbennett4178
    @drewbennett4178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How many Nocts does it weigh?

  • @AlumarsX
    @AlumarsX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'd rather sell my XF23 and get the XF18 instead.

  • @VariTimo
    @VariTimo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The manual focus clutch is an interface element. There’s no reason it can’t be precisely mapped to the linear motor. They just don’t care about it.

    • @kalenderquantentunnel9411
      @kalenderquantentunnel9411 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have both lenses with this feature, the 23mm as well as the 16mm and I think it's more of an annoyance. You knock back the ring too easily in your bag or when carrying the camera and as most other lenses and X100 variants dont have this feature I often use the switch on the camera first just to realize I should have pulled back that ring. In the end Fuji must have thought the same and is dropping this feature from their lineup for good.

    • @VariTimo
      @VariTimo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kalenderquantentunnel9411 They could just implement electronically controlled focus rings with stops and distances and an on/off switch. It’s just lack of standards.

    • @kalenderquantentunnel9411
      @kalenderquantentunnel9411 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VariTimo There already is an on-off switch on every body and the redundancy creates more trouble than it is helpful. Just skip that. You have a distance-scale in in the finder where it is pretty much useless e.g. to preset the camera and stops, even semi-soft electronic ones, would be a definitive improvement so I agree with you on most points. 😉

  • @TeteRecinos
    @TeteRecinos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When I first got my x100t I was super excited because of the reviews but soon realized I hated using it because of the 35mm FOV which I wasn't used to whatsoever. After a few months I began to like the x100 for what it could do instead of hating it for what it couldn't and now 35mm is my most used focal length. That being said I think people should realize that when most photographers say "Oh I love my 35mm" they are talking about a full frame 35mm 1.4 (sigma/canon/nikon/sony) which provides an awesome "wide + shallow depth of field" look.
    (Not saying there are no good 35mm eq for micro 4/3 or APS-C)

    • @trym2121
      @trym2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      24 1.4 is also versatile if you crop 30-40% of your picture for portrait. Hahaha

    • @TeteRecinos
      @TeteRecinos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trym2121 xD

  • @anilkumarmalviya7038
    @anilkumarmalviya7038 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Only Tamron knows when they will release the lens for x mount.. Its been a while that they announced and yet there's nothing from them 😢

  • @ihatesjws1188
    @ihatesjws1188 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Test out the Tokina 33mm 1.4 vs viltrox 33mm f1.4

  • @badhabit714
    @badhabit714 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He s EXCITED to play with IT!!

  • @DanteJDM
    @DanteJDM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Perfect timing for the new 23mm as I've been longing for one for a while now. Currently on the 16mm f1.4 and it's beautiful, but it's just that little too wide for my mostly-portrait work. Thank you guys for the excellent review! I'm amped for the new 23! Any possible MSRP yet by any chance?

    • @Nightshade1881
      @Nightshade1881 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      $799

    • @thomhayesimaging
      @thomhayesimaging 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’ll really regret selling the 16mm - it’s a beast, such a great lens and you’ll miss those cinematic wide but shallow shots!
      I have the 16, the 56 and the older 23. The 23, despite is downfalls is still by far my favourite. Such a natural feeling focal length. Wide enough to set the scene, but still looks natural. When it nails focus, it’s incredible. But it misses a lot, it’s slow and noisy, and not weather-sealed… if this new one solved those issues whilst still keeping the originals lovely characteristics then I’m sooooold. Can’t wait to get my hands on one, but can’t bring myself to sell the 16 or 56 to do it! Haha

    • @BTMovieSecondChannel
      @BTMovieSecondChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you buy the lens :)? I own the 16mm f1,4 as well, but think about adding the new 23mm f1,4 to my collection.

  • @Rohitkumar-hn5og
    @Rohitkumar-hn5og 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Recently I bought sigma 16mm 1.4 for lumix g85 but I didn't find any review from u guys about this lens,🙄🙄 plz if u used it what's ur thoughts ❤️

    • @VoidShepherd
      @VoidShepherd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I personally love the 30 and 56 mm Sigmas for MFT.

    • @Rohitkumar-hn5og
      @Rohitkumar-hn5og 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VoidShepherd I luv 16mm and frankly I m using it because I work in a very tight space and I know sigma makes excellent line of lens ❤️❤️

    • @VoidShepherd
      @VoidShepherd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rohitkumar-hn5og I really didn't like Sigma before these lenses probably because of my experience with them from the film days. Their new stuff is pretty good though.

    • @Rohitkumar-hn5og
      @Rohitkumar-hn5og 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VoidShepherd yep they r prograising and if I wanted any third party lens surely at first glance I look to sigma lineup in this present era for any camera brand

  • @hpw8334
    @hpw8334 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which has better depth/3d look, the new or old f1.4?

  • @fingersmcginty
    @fingersmcginty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would like to see a head to head comparison between Chris and Jordan. Your heads. Compared, just like lenses.

  • @amaitra
    @amaitra 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Almost looks like if one is interested in basic picture quality - Fuji body / lens combos are the best?

    • @danieldougan269
      @danieldougan269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Generally speaking, the best image quality comes from the largest sensors. Fuji also sells medium format cameras that have amazing quality, but that comes at a cost.
      There's a lot more that goes into a purchase decision. What's the right balance of cost, size/weight, and image quality? I think Fuji has a great formula here, but everyone's needs are different. Modern full frame cameras will have better image quality than this, but by how much? Is that worth carrying bigger, heavier, and more expensive lenses?
      What about features that make it easier to get the shot? What about video? Menu systems? That's why Chris and Jordan often end up asking, "Who is this camera for?'

    • @amaitra
      @amaitra 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@danieldougan269 seemingly, the Fuji sensors are all designed by Sony - so how can they be "better"?
      It is not just the size but the ability of each pixel. Just having more is not necessarily better. GFX 100 and Sony 60M are "likely" the same sensor technology. The difference is likely in the lens and how fuji interprets the sensor data.
      Seemingly they are better at interpreting the sensor data than Sony themselves! Of course perhaps better lens too.
      Usually when this happens, it is because the actual component comes from a different source - not so uncommon e.g. google maps interprets motion sensors in iPhone better than Apple can ;-)

  • @mahidoes
    @mahidoes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The length increase night be small when used in bigger bodies but if you are using with T20 or T30 like I do, then it's obvious. I love the close focusing ability and liner motor but the size increase is turn off for me. I'm going to keep my classic old one.

    • @NickCheng93
      @NickCheng93 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would you say the old 1.4 feels ok on the xt30? I know it's not going to be the most balanced but just want to make sure it's not crazy feeling

  • @catfreak
    @catfreak 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What kind of measurement are you using? Kiwi? What is it in metric noct?

  • @Ngchan2000
    @Ngchan2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what does WR mean? wide range? so would 'distortion" be an issue? i have a 18-55mm lens and i cannot bear its distortion so I so often use the 35mmF1.4 but its coverage is too narrow so I think 23mm would be a much better choice just in case it has no distortion

  • @Lurreable
    @Lurreable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Viltrox 23 mm has a lot of fringing, but it's also about a third of the price.

  • @perilthecat
    @perilthecat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love you guys and I know it’s not your choice but I’m sick of the “*it’s pre-pro so everything we say is subject to change” p-reviews. I wish the TH-cam incentive structure was different so that the camera companies couldn’t get away with this nonsense.

  • @Don-yf6yo
    @Don-yf6yo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It's funny that the 23mm F2 generally gets left out of the conversation any time someone talks about the 23mm lenses. The 23mm F2 is such a good lens (especially considering that it's half the price and size) that it deserves to be included in the conversation.

    • @TTWGD3
      @TTWGD3 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a 2.8 equivalent (actually f3) for depth of field so I think that is why but it is a very nice little lens

  • @allencrider
    @allencrider 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are sun stars a thing in wedding photography?

  • @erbterb
    @erbterb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I watched an older video on lumix 70-300 where you said it did not resolve enough for higher MP cameras.
    Should this distinction be part of a chart, where a class of lenses are defined as the cameras they can resolve to? Just looking at price and other videos about the lens mentioned above does not explain this. It is a testament to the immaturity of the youtube scene. Compare it to overgaards video on the S1R and SL2 where he compates old lenses to new lenses on new cameras.
    Best regards

  • @alanc6416
    @alanc6416 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the old 23mm F1.4 R and am really please with the results, but because I like smaller bodies and lenses, the new 23mm WR LM isn't for me. That being said Please ask Fuji to update their 23mmF2 to the newer X100V lens formula, or the 18mmF2 to WR LM and make them under 150g, I mean it's definitely possible since Canon has one that's 100g, and Leica has one that's also around 150g. Heck Fuji has one tucked in the X100V and VI! These would be awesome lenses. I mean I love my X100V but it's really inconvenient to carry 2 bodies around travelling! It's really annoying to know that the X100V lens is so much better than the current 23mmF2 because of the close focusing problem. And it IS a problem not a feature, because I have owned the X100T/F/V and know the difference is dramatic! Please Fuji!
    Sorry for the bother, as I have posted this numerous times in your channel, and know you have asked many times as well. But thank you for all your videos!

  • @David-vb8tg
    @David-vb8tg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how they have announced this and half a year later theres still none in Australia

  • @sebcastilho
    @sebcastilho 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is gorgeous. What camera and lens was used?

    • @Weird_Quests
      @Weird_Quests 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of the time is Panasonic s1H and 24-70 2.8 s pro

    • @MichaelRichards983
      @MichaelRichards983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Weird_Quests I think this video was shot on something different; it really looked good. Noticeably improved

    • @Weird_Quests
      @Weird_Quests 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MichaelRichards983 oh - maybe. I’ve seen a few comments about the R3 - but I’m guessing we’ll have to see :)

  • @miguelduarte821
    @miguelduarte821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't get it - why doesn't Chris like the 35mm focal length?

  • @calvinchann1996
    @calvinchann1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No Jordan?

  • @scottgmaclean
    @scottgmaclean 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would love to see a video on Chris and Jordan’s favourite photographers and videographers.

    • @hameed
      @hameed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Chris's favorite videographer is Jordan, and Jordan's favorite photographer is Chris.

    • @1Patient
      @1Patient 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hameed 😃😅

  • @marcp.1752
    @marcp.1752 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seriously, i do love the old, original Fujinon XF 23/1.4 R, for 400 bucks incl. 1 year warranty via camera shop, A grade, like new in original box & papers.
    Pro
    - character lens
    - focus clutch
    - the well known 35mm focal length FoV, one lens to shoot it all
    - metal build quality & great design
    - not being too big, too huge
    Con
    - no WR, hence weathersealing
    - no lens for pixel poopers, err, -peepers

  • @alexanderhartmann7950
    @alexanderhartmann7950 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much Noct is one C battery?

  • @bartjeej
    @bartjeej 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like a nice lens, but I don't get why the linear focus motor and manual focus clutch are mutually exclusive. Is this also the case with other brands that have manual focus clutches?
    By the way, did Chris stick to his promise or did Jordan just cut out all but one of his many complaints in editing? ;-)
    Regarding video quality, I thought it looked a bit like overcooked HDR
    (Edit) rewatched it and it's actually only the shot starting at 0:30 with a backlit Chris in front of the river that looks unnatural to me, the rest looks fine

  • @bsmukler
    @bsmukler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’m excited about this lens and have it on pre-order. Having said that, I have a suggestion or request. Could you create an episode comparing current high end full frame combinations (such as an SL2 with an SL Summicron) with the GFX 50S II and GFX 100/100S and lens? I say “and” because I am also curious how the 50MP and 102MP versions compare since they are using the same size sensor and thus reducing the pixel size. My basic question is whether high end lenses, such as the SL Summicron line, designed to resolve well beyond 100MP, make up for the somewhat smaller sensors in full frame systems. I know it is largely a question of the viewer’s impression, and I would love to hear your discussion.

  • @jeffmpvd7689
    @jeffmpvd7689 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still waiting for my Fuji 27mm pancake that I ordered 6 months ago. Still backordered.

    • @Nayson
      @Nayson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Still rocking the OG 27mm which I got for £100 as a grey import. It’s not always on my camera but it never leaves my every day carry bag as it’s just so damn small.

    • @krolldavid
      @krolldavid 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here

  • @dewalta
    @dewalta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What’s the story with 23mm focal length? :-)

  • @thamtham4924
    @thamtham4924 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does he use X-T4 in this vdo? Look really small.

    • @GuidoGautsch
      @GuidoGautsch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, looks like an X-T4 to me

    • @thamtham4924
      @thamtham4924 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe he use both in vdo.

  • @campeonphotography9569
    @campeonphotography9569 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i watch your videos strictly for the sarcasm and you never disappoint ;)

  • @terrywbreedlove
    @terrywbreedlove 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the Aperture eq, F2 ?

    • @eagleeyephoto8715
      @eagleeyephoto8715 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is f1.4 lens and when used depth of field is around f1.9-ish.

  • @NisBerg
    @NisBerg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the Viltrox 23/1.4 hoping it would outperform Fuji or would be close to it, but no. It's sharp in the center and then gets mushy very fast, it's almost like gaussian blur. It happens wide open and still at 2.0. Shame. Who can blame it though, it doesn't cost nearly as much as Fuji equivalent.

  • @niftyfifty8431
    @niftyfifty8431 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If the weather sealing is just the rubber ring... that doesn't weight that much! :-P

  • @jimbo9203
    @jimbo9203 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    But how many Nocts does it weigh?! Obscure units such as "grams" mean nothing to me

  • @rayking2696
    @rayking2696 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is there any Distortion?

  • @zacredacted2137
    @zacredacted2137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hmmmmmmmmmm what was this shot on?? Lots of moving/tracking shots.

  • @jeremytheoneofdestiny8691
    @jeremytheoneofdestiny8691 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anyone who dislikes 35 mm lenses is not to be trusted!

  • @costas4287
    @costas4287 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it good for video?

  • @dimz2898
    @dimz2898 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Those colors! So nice!

  • @victormultanen1981
    @victormultanen1981 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    grea comparison!

  • @gergo.r
    @gergo.r 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about coma?

  • @sn4rl277
    @sn4rl277 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So basically you paying 2x the price from the Mk1 to the Mk2 for better AF, slight sharpness bump, weather sealing, and closer focus distance. So throwing $400 ish at a 25% gain, sounds like I will pass and keep my Mk1, and put that $400 into another lens I want.

    • @BadTwin25
      @BadTwin25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To make good stuff more perfect it’s not cheap.

  • @daxmenardo
    @daxmenardo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    for this price, I shall get an x100v instead

  • @icogicog8287
    @icogicog8287 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    True that the Fuji primes needed a bit of “age makeover” and Fuji seems to be addressing a lot of the complaints about the “old” lenses. More relevant perhaps is that they are improving optical quality to have a reasonable amount of optics to fully benefit from the upgrade in sensor that is forthcoming in 2022. Would you know which lenses of the recent crop can actually fully support the 40 (43)MP sensor that should go into the H2?

    • @recklesscoding
      @recklesscoding 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In theory, all of the new primes are meant for the new high-res sensor.

  • @bmeclipse
    @bmeclipse 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like you and 35mm equivalent lenses. Hoorah!

  • @williamgoss4691
    @williamgoss4691 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video, but wasn’t really interested in the 23mm, more the under current of gentle vitriol between presenter and Camera / Director…

  • @joshevangelista6862
    @joshevangelista6862 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why won’t anyone show the distortion of this lens?

    • @WarpedTrekker
      @WarpedTrekker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it is optically sound with no distortion.

  • @sundarAKintelart
    @sundarAKintelart 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Viltrox an inspiration???