Yugioh Player Tries To Guess BANNED or BROKEN MTG Cards w/

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 416

  • @echo-ygo
    @echo-ygo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +335

    Dude this video was so fun to record, thank you for having me ❤️

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      You were awesome! Would love to have you back again

    • @mrrandomassduck
      @mrrandomassduck 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Congrats echo. Good reasoning. 🤘

    • @Lightning_Lance
      @Lightning_Lance 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      (video spoilers)
      congrats on 5/5! Well done :D

    • @vonBelfry
      @vonBelfry 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      (Spoiler warning)
      Smart. Seriously, good work. Very quickly wrapped your head around the comparative speed of the game and the combat mechanics.

    • @TheTexasDice
      @TheTexasDice 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I loved how at 4:30 you asked deck building questions! Well played, Echo!

  • @estevaoM524
    @estevaoM524 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +171

    the lesson to take from this is that if Yugioh players could learn to read they would be unstoppable

    • @naughter3674
      @naughter3674 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I know the meme of not reading in yugioh but it makes you realize how crazy our memory is for a game that we memorize so many cards to the point of not having to read them.

  • @Folfire
    @Folfire 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +128

    I would always show Platinum Angel as an opener just to mess with them

    • @matthewpopow6647
      @matthewpopow6647 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      For bonus points, put it next to Abyssal Persecutor

    • @wurgel1
      @wurgel1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@matthewpopow6647 followed by Door to Nothingness

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      I love this idea lol

    • @Netro1992
      @Netro1992 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      >me, having flashbacks to tooth and nail decks

    • @Dreznin
      @Dreznin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      For pure trolling, show them the Mirrodin block artifact lands. Without contaxt, they're functionally just like the basic lands that happen to also be artifacts and lose the ability to interact with things that specify basic lands... no other abilities, still obey normal play rules for lands, they're just artifacts instead of being Basic... just... artifacts... what's the worst that could happen?

  • @crawdaddy2004
    @crawdaddy2004 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    24:25 Four out of four so far. And you know why I know he’s never played MtG? Because the reasoning for Alrund’s Epiphany was so very, VERY off.

    • @aidan8473
      @aidan8473 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Yu-Gi-Oh has way more exile loop B.S. - which I have to imagine is what he was thinking.

    • @solbradguy7628
      @solbradguy7628 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      When he read the card and then started saying "So this card makes...creatures?" I was thinking "That is NOT the important part here" lol

    • @Bottleorum
      @Bottleorum 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Anyone who has played HS or Magic ever and sees "take an extra turn" - unless it takes like 10 steps that shit is gonna be broken. 7 mana (or more importantly the foretell) is hella broken simply because if you ever establish a board you just dome your opponent instantly.

    • @TheMCGamer2012
      @TheMCGamer2012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@BottleorumModern has 3 mana extra turn spells- Alrund is unplayable outside of standard

    • @bjp4869
      @bjp4869 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      His Phyrexian Obliterator analysis was peak magic player mindset though. “Dies to removal. No ban needed”

  • @cowmanthe3rd
    @cowmanthe3rd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I always chuckle when the Yu-Gi-Oh players ask about set symbols, it's something that makes perfect sense coming from a game where all the little emblems actually have a game purpose though.

    • @egoalter1276
      @egoalter1276 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I mean, city in a bottle/apocalypse chime technicaly sets precedent for set symbols mattering.

    • @cowmanthe3rd
      @cowmanthe3rd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@egoalter1276 oh yeah, there's definitely a few cards that care about it, but only a few.

  • @vexyzdlurkinglegend
    @vexyzdlurkinglegend 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

    As soon as you said the last card was gonna be a lot of words, and I remembered you were going in WUBRG order, I knew it would be Questing Beast

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Good guess 🤣

    • @pietrociompi5883
      @pietrociompi5883 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      it was either questing beast or the original wording of Sylvan Library. I was 50/50

    • @livedandletdie
      @livedandletdie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@pietrociompi5883 Let's be happy that there wasn't any colorless cards, because, some of those olden day cards from like ice cauldron... yeah..

    • @laytonjr6601
      @laytonjr6601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pietrociompi5883 Chains of Mephistopholes

    • @kobisjeruk
      @kobisjeruk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@livedandletdie _Amulet of Quoz wants to know your location_

  • @matiaspereyra9392
    @matiaspereyra9392 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Asking a Yugioh player to pay anything above 3 mana is like asking mr crabs to pay at all

    • @brunop.8745
      @brunop.8745 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It implies there is such a thing as a turn 4, a concept completely alien to YGO players

    • @JinFreeks
      @JinFreeks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@brunop.8745 As I understand it how YGO players count turns it would actually mean turn 7 (each players go is counted as a turn in YGO - if I understand correctly). Which makes "YGO games usually end on turn 3" even more insane to me.

    • @matiaspereyra9392
      @matiaspereyra9392 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JinFreeks ye ye, it's usually
      I play
      You play and try to push for game playing through my board
      If I'm still alive hopefully I get you on the crackback
      (Tho every once in a while is more like:
      I/we play
      We play, I try to stop you in real time you try to push for game
      And then the same turn but switched around)
      Although I was saying it bc paying in Yugioh usually means paying with cards and not every card gets you something for being in the grave, so going -3 to accomplish nothing that's game defining happens in Yugioh quite a bit (usually it's your opponent having some interactionwith your board) and it usually means that you lost, either right now or that turn 3 is going to be a tossup on you being able to push for game and on turn 4 you're done most likely done and going -4 is so bad you usually concede. While in other games paying is not that detrimental it goes in the same brain area, so a Yugioh player trying to play another game has difficulty assessing a 4+ cost card in any other game because they have a goblin inside telling them "hold on there pardner, that shit's too expensive for what it does, we're gonna lose if you put this card on your deck"

    • @spencerignatescue158
      @spencerignatescue158 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@brunop.8745 But not to mystic mine players ;)

  • @LyubenV
    @LyubenV 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I once got a Obliterator with my Cryptic Coat, and a 7/7 Amalia blocked it.
    Was a great moment.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Oh wow 🤣

    • @gamerbear84
      @gamerbear84 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OUCH lol

    • @youbluethatone1017
      @youbluethatone1017 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Cryptic coat makes it unblockable tho 🤔

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@youbluethatone1017 they probably moved the coat to another creature before they attacked with the 2/2 cloaked Obliterator (or added cloak to hand)

    • @collin4555
      @collin4555 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheOneJameYT Amusingly, Cryptic Coat has no Equip ability, it can only go back to hand and then cloak a new card off the top. Or, it can be moved onto something through another card's effect, but that's unusual.

  • @boopmcdoop7841
    @boopmcdoop7841 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Currently jamming Obliterator + Fight spells in Standard. It is not good. But between flawless victories and opponents re-reading the card after shooting it, so worth it.

    • @obsoleteorange
      @obsoleteorange 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I actually run it in my standard rats deck as a way to beat red/green decks. No brotherhood's end board wipes from them without repercussions!

    • @SlaughtingIdiots
      @SlaughtingIdiots 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like playing an artifact deck, mightstone and weakstone is SUCH a blessing i HATE the obliterator since packing your deck full of removal is so boring.

    • @youbluethatone1017
      @youbluethatone1017 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s still in standard?

    • @triopsate3
      @triopsate3 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is why I'm an esper mage. I can choose to destroy a creature, bounce it, exile it or just wrath it because esper mages love to remove creatures.

    • @obsoleteorange
      @obsoleteorange 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@triopsate3 with my rat deck i give you many good options to destroy so its all even lol

  • @SpiritSquadMTG
    @SpiritSquadMTG 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Giving a YGO player Fable to evaluate is straight-up evil. But this guy killed the challenge!

  • @jamiecollins7915
    @jamiecollins7915 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    a new person joins the five for five card fight club. Impressive, most impressive.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      3 people in the club now!

    • @ThetrueKidGoku
      @ThetrueKidGoku 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Who are the other two?

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@ThetrueKidGoku Mia from Nitpicking Nerds and Tronisbad! Might be worth checking those videos out because they’re great!

  • @johndoe9343
    @johndoe9343 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's funny you mention toughness and planeswalkers. If you've played long enough, you probably remember that funny time when you or an opponent tried to make a planeswalker indestructible only to be told "nah it dies with no loyalty counters anyways" when it gets attacked.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve done that and was very sad lol

  • @aggrofrag5005
    @aggrofrag5005 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    As for Pokémon TCG creators, AzulGG is an accredited player and has collaborated with other channels before. LittleDarkFury is also one of my favorites in the space. Either would be a great guest to have here!

  • @ThetrueKidGoku
    @ThetrueKidGoku 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I think Joshua Schmidt would be great at this specific game, Broken or Banned. Just showing him cards to see if they're good or bad would be too easy for him.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree he would be!

  • @TempestDacine
    @TempestDacine 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Omg he cleared the obliterator bait. Noone guesses that right

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He’s good!

    • @laytonjr6601
      @laytonjr6601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Mono red and Mono green literally cannot deal with it but don't worry, it was never banned

    • @TempestDacine
      @TempestDacine 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Green can use a beast within type at least. But yeah its good but it was never like nearly as insane as it looked when it was first shown in new phyrexia.

    • @esol927
      @esol927 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@laytonjr6601I mean that's the big weakness of mono-color decks right? You gain consistency but sacrifice ability to deal with certain kinds of threats.

    • @esol927
      @esol927 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not all colors should be able to do everything

  • @lukewest7216
    @lukewest7216 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Funniest interaction with Obliterator is definitely that if your opponent finds a way for it to fight one of your own creatires or deal damage to itself (like with Asmor) then you sac the permanents

  • @dark_rit
    @dark_rit 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Of course questing beast couldn't get banned, it dies to doom blade.
    One card I would show people in these would be timesifter, just to mess with them. That or tornado from alliances.

  • @Reynar7
    @Reynar7 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The way I like to try and explain the difference between Yugioh and MTG is things like discarding, In Yugioh you have to have the exact amount of cards to discard or the spell/trap cant be activated, but in MTG Discard 2 is not a restriction on casting.

  • @raymondvanderbunt6402
    @raymondvanderbunt6402 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Phyrexian Obliterator seems to strike me as MTG's answer to Power Tool Dragon, which is already obscene considering PTD's ability to survive 4 turns with a backrow.

  • @younasdar5572
    @younasdar5572 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I like to explain fortell as being like YGO trap cards where you need to pay to set them, but in exchange you get a discount for flipping them face up.

  • @sam7559
    @sam7559 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Interesting that the yugioh player was able to figure out why a broken creature wasn't banned, because it dies to removal.

  • @milotheham9678
    @milotheham9678 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My guys reasoning was out of this world. His tcg awareness is insane.

  • @ramsfanz1
    @ramsfanz1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    For Arlunds it was so funny seeing how every sentence had to be explained to him.

    • @doctoroctococks8968
      @doctoroctococks8968 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      i think you mean every sentence, period. I gave up, dude sounds out to lunch.

    • @Zetact_
      @Zetact_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I frankly don't get how it's MtG of all games that has people say "reading the card explains the card."

    • @ramsfanz1
      @ramsfanz1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@doctoroctococks8968 yea i agree. Guy could read "Gain 2 life" and would still ask "what does that mean?"

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣

    • @PlayMadness
      @PlayMadness 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@Zetact_ Because Magic cards are written to say exactly what they do in the clearest possible way. It's not like games like Yugioh, where reading any given card makes you feel like you're having a stroke.

  • @crowcoregames1785
    @crowcoregames1785 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    25:38 and of course proliferate exists and getting to 3 counters is laughably easy but also if you want to just repeat the 1st or second effect
    removing counters well that's fairly easy too

  • @domotoroOfficial
    @domotoroOfficial 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    giving him questing beast is nasty because it came out in such a ridiculous set/era for powerful cards, letting it kinda fly under the radar. good job on him getting them all right, very impressive!

    • @nekrataali
      @nekrataali 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Questing Beast was like the Deadbridge Goliath of Eldraine. Would have been good in any previous Standard format that wasn't the one it existed in lmao

  • @Sheeps856
    @Sheeps856 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    He's four for four, I believe he'll get five. I know he's not played magic before, there was that brief misunderstanding of "Oh, so when you've exiled Alrund's (as part of its resolution) you can re-cast it?"

  • @dreadisdarkore2703
    @dreadisdarkore2703 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Next time someone says at least it doesn't have a paragraph on the card you should show them the full rules text secret lair land. Just to show them how much we really like condensing text into keywords in magic.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @randomperson5579
    @randomperson5579 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    5 million rulings outside of the card, if only he knew about Humility, a very simple card, that requires a doctorate in MTG rulings to understand what even happens 50% of the time. it makes pole position extremely easy to understand (at least all you or a judge needs to know to resolve pole position properly is the loops part of the ruling, whereas humility needs you to know effect priorities)

    • @tinfoilslacks3750
      @tinfoilslacks3750 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I mean humility is pretty chill *until* something else in the same layer comes down. In most basic games it dpes exactly what it says

  • @williamfalls
    @williamfalls 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This series is the only way I learn anything Magic The Gathering related.

  • @NoPodcastsHere
    @NoPodcastsHere 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Can you block with cards from your hand?" *WOTC card design team's eyes widen* "Not yet..."

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣

    • @artemiskearney8019
      @artemiskearney8019 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah, WotC hates blocking. And we've already gotten attack from hand twice now (dash and blitz).

    • @NoPodcastsHere
      @NoPodcastsHere 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@artemiskearney8019 I was just thinking about an ability where once you've blocked you can pay this ability's cost to put a creature into play blocking that creature as well and the original creature gains a 'prevent all damage this creature would do and return this card to hand at the end of combat' type deal. I really like the idea of using a beefy creature in hand to absorb combat damage (since you get to assign damage distribution) while blocking. I know control probably doesn't need any help but I feel like aggro could use some cooling too.

    • @johncameron1935
      @johncameron1935 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Blocking ninjitsu would be pretty cool.

    • @Sparkofmidnight
      @Sparkofmidnight 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Flash creatures can already be used as instant speed blockers. It's just usually good Flash Creatures are utility based or very frail.

  • @Dj87887
    @Dj87887 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As soon as you said wait for the last card, I knew it was going to be Questing Beast. Haha. But you didn't explain to your guest that foretell saves your spells from hand disruption.

  • @catfishrob1
    @catfishrob1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Honestly by the way he was talking it seemed he didnt understand a lot, but he somehow stumbled onto the right answer every single time. Pretty impressive.

  • @briang3598
    @briang3598 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd say I'm surprised that for Alrund's epiphany, he didn't consider the angle that Foretell gives some protection from an opponent's discard effects, but I guess that kind of thing has largely gone out of vogue in Yugioh.

  • @MrToxicB1izzard
    @MrToxicB1izzard 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Have this guy on again, this was the most entertaining guest so far!

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Happy to hear that!

  • @ryanstewart2289
    @ryanstewart2289 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's amazing how much card analysis changes with format.

  • @alchemicpink2392
    @alchemicpink2392 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Very glad we have a YuGiOh player who didn't get confuzzled by a card taking 6+ turns for its full effect.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yea I was thinking the same thing

  • @vonBelfry
    @vonBelfry 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Echo smart. He considered the speed of the game, he considered that setup time is indeed a cost in itself and he considered magic combat mechanics.

    • @ShardtheWolf
      @ShardtheWolf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If only he could read 😂

  • @ANDELE3025
    @ANDELE3025 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Now im imagining a reverse engineering stream/broken telephone.
    You get a Yugioh/Pokemon/Hearthstone/whatever person to "translate" a card/its effects to that game (e.g. YGO case "damage cant be prevented = can't be wabokud", "deathtouch = has Exploder without burn/Neo Bubbleman/Ally of Justice style effect", etc) and then a third person that knows MTG and that other game tries to guess the "translated" cards.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That sounds hilarious lol

  • @xLuminary
    @xLuminary 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I can't get over the sunglasses and hat indoors.

  • @remulas13
    @remulas13 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was so fun to watch, please bring echo back! Keep the great content coming my friend!

  • @younasdar5572
    @younasdar5572 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Might also be interesting in the future to show someone the closest functional "normal" version of a phyrexian mana card followed by the phyrexian version.
    Like peek followed by "gitaxian probe", reclaim followed by "noxious revival" or "minor misstep" followed by "mental misstep".
    First they get to figure out that (for most of them) the effect is bad even when it's cheap, then a 0 cost version that does the MTG equivalent of 800lp damage to you makes it worth a slot.
    Maybe it's to easy though, 0 mana is almost always good.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea I think that would be too easy but a good idea nonetheless

    • @younasdar5572
      @younasdar5572 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe the ones that don't become 0 cost, like murder v dismember ?

  • @mawillix2018
    @mawillix2018 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would have watched this when it released, but my right lung collapsed, and I'm currently watching this in the hospital.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh wow get better soon!!

  • @lefloidNemesis
    @lefloidNemesis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "I am bad at reading"
    You alreafy told us you play yugioh.

  • @thesarcasticliberal
    @thesarcasticliberal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    He did very well. You to show some Yugioh people some REALLY broken cards, like Time Walk, Ancestral Recall and Oko. Also, Shahrazad, just because it's funny.

  • @johncameron1935
    @johncameron1935 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Drop Echo a modern deck. My man has threat assessment on point.

  • @dorping_Wolf
    @dorping_Wolf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    good old Obliterator.
    in a creature vacuum this could be one of the strongest creatures ever made. (in its mana range)
    but since there are probably 1000 answers to this card (100 different kill spells, 100 bounces, counters, pacifism, steals,... )...
    well its just a creature with 0 protection..

  • @Moshinoki
    @Moshinoki 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This was great, what a chill dude

  • @dudono1744
    @dudono1744 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I expected the card that gains the effects of all cards in your grave. Yugioh players would find it utterly broken.

  • @akroma443
    @akroma443 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok, been away from MTG for ages but I'm definitely adding Farewell to my Shrine deck. That thing generates mana so easy and this would just let me make so many turn-around plays if I'm in a bad spot

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep!! So good

  • @HinekoAkahi
    @HinekoAkahi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Completely called Questing Beast being the green card when you mentioned paragraphs of text after Farewell.
    It do be infamous lmao

  • @kateslate3228
    @kateslate3228 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The YGO brain cannot comprehend cards that have COSTS.

    • @KeshavKrishnan
      @KeshavKrishnan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We have cards with costs too, we just don't have mana

    • @kateslate3228
      @kateslate3228 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KeshavKrishnan If you explain PSC to me, I will fight you in the fucking street.

    • @RinaShinomiyaVal
      @RinaShinomiyaVal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PSCT is just the programming language of YGO. Just look for key punctuation, sequential and other phrases such as "do x and if you do, perform Y" and have decent reading comprehension and you are good to go. ​@@kateslate3228

    • @mrruniccross1226
      @mrruniccross1226 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I started laughing when he said you wouldn't drop Questing Beast on turn 1 like that is an option 99% of the time. As someone that plays both games it always messes with me how difficult the switch between them is for someone who only plays one.

  • @Whitewingdevil
    @Whitewingdevil 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Gotta leave a like and comment, I love these "reacting to mtg cards" videos!

  • @JosefDerKaiser
    @JosefDerKaiser 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You see I thought Farewell exiled ALL CARDS of the stated type, from the hand, deck, or cemetery.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh that would be insane lol

    • @laytonjr6601
      @laytonjr6601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hand is a private zone so you can't prove I have creatures, artefacts or enchantments in it without an effect to reveal it

    • @KeshavKrishnan
      @KeshavKrishnan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@laytonjr6601judge call turbo lmao

    • @nekrataali
      @nekrataali 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd pay 6 mana to Doomsday myself and my opponent lmao 🤣

    • @JosefDerKaiser
      @JosefDerKaiser 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@laytonjr6601 I figured it would work like Yu-Gi-Oh where if the effect is relevant you would have to do it anyway. I guess that's a magic rule explained to Echo before this was filmed.

  • @wobblycobbly3562
    @wobblycobbly3562 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wouldve done Chalice of the Void, I showed it to a friend who plays pokemon and he thought it was the most busted card ever

  • @raynegro666
    @raynegro666 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Really impressive showing

  • @SDREHXC
    @SDREHXC 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Obliterator feels like a broken card when you’re bad (me) but feels like a card that isn’t as broken against people who aren’t bad (not me).

    • @Silentpoppy
      @Silentpoppy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its one of those cards where if you can play it without worrying about the cost its pretty good some decks just cant deal with it easily.

    • @nekrataali
      @nekrataali 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Obliterator has been power crept pretty bad with Sheoldred. It was already an upgrade from Phyrexian Negator, which was a bonkers card in its time.
      If Obliterator existed during Black Summer '96, there's a very real chance it would have been banned lol.

  • @realzionygo
    @realzionygo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Been enjoying these vids! It's like all I watch now!

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great to hear!

  • @kaemonbonet4931
    @kaemonbonet4931 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Phyrexian obliterator is a great answer to the current temur lands deck.

  • @chad3166
    @chad3166 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In some formats, Phyrexian Obliterator can be played on turn 1

  • @IzzRei
    @IzzRei 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I feel like you have to constantly remind yugioh players that when creatures attacks, they don’t attack other creatures. They forget the blocking part of the battle phase because that’s not in Yugioh.
    Bro got all the way to questing beast and I can tell he was thinking that deathtouch means you can ram it into larger creatures at will, even saying things like “you want them to establish their board before playing it” no my friend, you run this out there fast as possible and make them deal with it.

  • @adambryant6854
    @adambryant6854 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Can u show specifically magic combos there is plenty that are good and bad that look bad that are good and vice versa

  • @bencheevers6693
    @bencheevers6693 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This guy is hype great showing!

  • @Nova_vant_harr
    @Nova_vant_harr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man i’m feeling dumb. I played (casually) magic for quite a while. From the original kamigawa all the way until my final set with dinosaurs and pirates and i had no idea there was even a ban list and i went 2/5 on this 😅

  • @TheMCGamer2012
    @TheMCGamer2012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a Modern player where Time Warp barely sees any play, some bunch of babies must have complained about Alrund's.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People were copying it in standard to take multiple turns in a row

    • @TheMCGamer2012
      @TheMCGamer2012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheOneJameYT Wouldn't that be like 2 cards and 9 mana? Seems reasonable for a wincon

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheMCGamer2012 yea it’s 2 cards and 8 mana after the foretell, and it couldn’t be Duress’d out of exile

  • @MrGaiakid
    @MrGaiakid 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love how this guy is like "this is whatever in yugioh, you discard two to draw two, its card neutral" Like there is a reason why Graceful Charity is still banned to this day, you know how many decks would LOVE this effect in Yugioh?

  • @tv_tim
    @tv_tim 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Believer, I want to see him do the 5/5
    Edit: He got it!

  • @ninjawxyz1260
    @ninjawxyz1260 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don't know many Pokemon TCG content creators but when I was into the Pokemon TCG, I watched a bunch of a content creator called Tricky Gym

  • @DarkDragon2344
    @DarkDragon2344 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    >Reading the card explains the card
    >Has to explain basically every line of text
    I dunno if that first part is true lol

  • @patpatsbacks9117
    @patpatsbacks9117 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Scapeshift would be a fun green spell for this series.

  • @totallynotnarhei2711
    @totallynotnarhei2711 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love your videos cause a lot of people that don't play yugioh cannot fathom how completely different yugioh is compared to every other TCG on the market.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea it’s way different lol

  • @MaxWeb2599
    @MaxWeb2599 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I never played magic and got only Kiki jiki wrong because I thought being between turn 5 and 6 a siting duck would balanced it.

  • @minecraft991115
    @minecraft991115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    farewell against nine lives, its so nice

  • @DragonWaffleX
    @DragonWaffleX 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You should bring a dude named Flex Daddy. He's a small pokemon creator but I really like his videos. He also recently won a regionals.

  • @Jackaroo.
    @Jackaroo. 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s crazy to me that yugioh players wouldn’t haven’t played MTG. Yugioh was inspired by MTG.

    • @RinaShinomiyaVal
      @RinaShinomiyaVal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TBH the concept of bricking due not seeing enough mana or far too many is a turn off. That and I prefer anime over western fantasy art. Two different styles for each camp of folk. Yugioh has the more skillful player generally win as varience is at a all time minimum. Also makes it easy to recreate situations in the lab/testing, reminds of fighting games in that way

  • @Krowtic
    @Krowtic 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny that a Yu-Gi-Oh player can't read 16 words to see "or more" yet knows and understands entire novel length mechanics of Yu-Gi-Oh cards.

  • @uS0ra
    @uS0ra 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    fav pokemon players i'd love to see are probably azulgg, chip richie(together would be cool too since they have a podcast together) and andrew mahone

  • @emberalus2229
    @emberalus2229 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of my friends plays Phyrexian Obliterator in pioneer in my LGS and I sideboard in Justice Strike against that card, it's super hilarious. Moral of this story, Obliterator is not banned AND not broken.

  • @matthewkeeling886
    @matthewkeeling886 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You should show someone Raging River, Chaos Orb or Chains of Mephistopheles one of these days... those would be nice and confusing.

  • @nsnick199
    @nsnick199 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Suggestion for a bait card for a future episode: One of the expansion hosers like Apocalypse Chime or City in a Bottle

  • @MTG_CMG
    @MTG_CMG 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes! Another one! Love these! Please keep doing these.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Happy you like them!

  • @SmoreDragon
    @SmoreDragon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You should have put Black Lotus and Platinum Angel in it to make him struggle

  • @Hurricayne92
    @Hurricayne92 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i would describe foretell as being like a trap card.

  • @kaemonbonet4931
    @kaemonbonet4931 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think you were too helpful with some of the early cards but no one gets fable of the mirror breaker right! Way to go echo!

  • @hyperdreamer9483
    @hyperdreamer9483 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just saying for Questing Beast its cost is negligible due to the fact it’s in green. green in the Ramp colour you can get Questing Beast out turn 3 pretty easily in this colour so you’re opponent working with like 2 mana is forced to deal with this thing and waste resources on this card that can quickly become a problem since you turn 2 plays can’t do anything it besides kill spells or damage spells.

  • @tiggerbane4325
    @tiggerbane4325 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve basically only learned magic through videos like this and I’m now confused on why Questing Beast is good?

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It does a lot for a 4 mana green card!

  • @PatJamma
    @PatJamma 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why didn't you just explain Foretell as "instead of paying 7 right now, you pay 2 to set it in a spell/trap zone that your opponent can't interact with. And from there, you can pay 6 for it on a different turn"

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea why didn’t I lol

    • @PatJamma
      @PatJamma 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheOneJameYT one of my favorite things about Magic vs Yugioh is that besides a resource system, how combat works, and having a Permanent limit, the games are surprisingly similar and translate across and you can easily use terms to bridge the gap instantly. One of my favorite examples being the time I witnessed someone trying to teach a Yugioh player Magic. The Yugioh player was having a hard time understanding combat and Trample. I said one thing and unlocked everything for him: "Trample is just Piercing Battle Damage from Yugioh and without Trample no damage is dealt to the player if they block."

  • @VooshSpokesman
    @VooshSpokesman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love from a BigHoles and Vaush fan!

  • @benjaminking3677
    @benjaminking3677 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Props to this dude. That list was not easy at all. Maybe he should start playing some mtg he'd be good lol

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea for sure lol

  • @wolfkong
    @wolfkong 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Have him look at cards from future sight and the original kamigawa flips

  • @MrMarnel
    @MrMarnel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Idea: find a Star Wars Unlimited content creator (I don't know any, don't follow the game but surely they exist) for the archetype game and include Kozmo in them as the once-good. Maybe also BES.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That would be awesome lol

  • @noxmusic3479
    @noxmusic3479 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I knew fable would be the red card. I low key miss that card 😂

  • @Soumein
    @Soumein 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    25:20 The Copied reflections would be sacced, though.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You make them after the start of opponent’s end step, so they stay alive on your turn, then die on your end step

    • @Soumein
      @Soumein 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheOneJameYT OH. Not just, "Oh"... OH.

    • @laytonjr6601
      @laytonjr6601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheOneJameYT I didn't think of that

  • @christophercobler9774
    @christophercobler9774 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you wanna confuse him, show him Goblin Game

  • @Kuronosa
    @Kuronosa 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I haven't played...really since Eldrain, I can't keep up because I'm poor, and dont tell me that Arena is a good substitute, its not.
    I knew that Mirror Breaker existed, but didn't know that it got banned, and i was pretty sure that unless Questing Beast had some degenerate thing going on in Pioneer, it wasn't going to be, because Modern would eat that thing for breakfast.
    I have an...intense....dislike of Obliterator...when it first came out during Mirran Besieged/New Phyrexia, i was playing a W/G deck that had VERY little interaction with it, because White didn't have the best answers back then, and board wipes in my deck were a no no.

  • @Reaper0800
    @Reaper0800 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    For Pokemon players you should ask AzulGG! He's the top player in US and he'd totally be down

  • @elvenatheart982
    @elvenatheart982 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man I cant belive Questing Beast is not banned

    • @kris834
      @kris834 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's not even that good lol, it's just decent for some sideboards. No competitive deck plays it mainboard

    • @pa_3op
      @pa_3op 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kris834though I love how it most of the time effectively have, like, half of it's text, but when the other half becomes relevant, it takes opponent quite some time to realize that it really has deathtouch/«prevention prevention»/damage to PW. Just because brain of a lot of players defaults it to hasty vigilant hard to block 4/4 brick.

    • @nekrataali
      @nekrataali 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was in a high-power Standard format that had lots of other bans. There was just so much going on in Eldraine Standard at four mana that making a hasty creature was "meh."
      You cast Questing Beast on your turn four and swing in for some damage. But then on your opponent's turn 4 they play Fires of Invention into Oko and turn your beast into an elk.

  • @bigmudder2478
    @bigmudder2478 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I knew it was gonna be questing beast lol

  • @esrohm6460
    @esrohm6460 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    boi bringing up only 1 legendary in the deck, i remember whe that was the actual rule and then i came back with commander, singelton by design, and then i saw in amonket that one exile spell that if it is a god exiles all coppies in hand as well and i just went "thats strange all gods a legendary so how you you possibly have one in hand with the same name outside of weird cloning shenanigans". as i was so out of touch at that point did this just lead to a weird conversation as neither side got the others standpoint but man we should bring back 1 legend per deck, maybe that stopps wizards from making every non uncommon creature a legendary
    ps.: i just had an alrunds epiphany, flying is literally toon in yugioh. toons also attack directly unless the opponent has toons

  • @jaydavidrn82
    @jaydavidrn82 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    if you use roaming throne with phyrexian obliterator it is so funny

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh wow that is cool

  • @ladygeneveve3805
    @ladygeneveve3805 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I think broken or banned is the least enjoyable mode for these

    • @henkdachief
      @henkdachief 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      its pretty clear cut tho and this video was nice

    • @Oxygen1004
      @Oxygen1004 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree, it's just "How would this be broken" instead of "Is this seemingly good effect still good in practice?"

    • @obsoleteorange
      @obsoleteorange 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Its at least a way to use cards that really just seem good that people won't miss on and making a game with them.

    • @TheOneJameYT
      @TheOneJameYT  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This mode worked well for Yugioh so I wanted to try it for Magic