WI v. Mark Jensen | Antifreeze Murder Retrial
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- NEXT LIVE TRIAL | Former stockbroker and convicted murderer Mark Jensen has been granted a new trial.
On Feb. 21, 2008, a jury found Jensen guilty of murdering his wife, Julie Jensen. Prosecutors claimed he poisoned Julie with antifreeze in 1998 so he could continue an affair with a woman he eventually married.
MORE HERE: www.courttv.co...
#CourtTV LIVE | Starts Mon. 1/9 | WI v. #MarkJensen | #AntifreezeMurderRetrial
COURT TV IS BACK! 24/7 LIVE gavel-to-gavel coverage, in-depth legal reporting, and expert analysis of the nation’s most important and compelling trials.
WATCH COURT TV LIVE:
www.courttv.co...
WATCH TRIALS ON DEMAND:
www.courttv.co...
WHERE TO WATCH:
www.courttv.co...
#CourtTV LIVE | Starts Mon. 1/9 | WI v. #MarkJensen | #AntifreezeMurderRetrial MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/news/wi-v-mark-jensen-man-accused-of-poisoning-wife/?
He’s guilty.
2008? It looks like 1988...
You read my mind. That's *exactly* what I was thinking.
Lol yep!
14 years ago...
Imagine if you were on the jury, found him innocent, then later found out she had written that letter, but it wasn't allowed in court.
I know
She may have written the letter but can’t be cross examined. She might have written it out of spite. Just because she wrote it doesn’t mean it’s true 🤷♂️
That is what is so flawed in our CRIMINAL justice system. Every decision is up to the Masonic judge to decide what is "allowed" and what isn't "allowed." That is so wrong on all fronts. Bring back our Common Law courts and start following our Bill of Rights and this would never happen. ALL evidence gets presented.
Don't wanna judge a book by it's cover but damn he looks scary. Also, when will people learn that you shouldn't be searching these things on a computer...
Thank goodness the original prosecutor is still available to keep this murderer behind bars for life
“He’s on borrow from Portage County”😭
Kevin Bacon needs to play him if a movie is ever made out of this
They are wasting taxpayer money … anyone who knows anything about anti freeze poisoning knows darn well she would not use this as a method to kill herself and frame her husband out of spite ! It is a horrible .. horrible way to die! He is where he belongs ! Keep him there and throw away the key! My thoughts and prayers are with her family for having to endure this endless nightmare 🙏🙏
They don’t need that letter they have enough
We know that judge!!
Let's hope we have smart jurors! Evidence is there.
A retrial because they couldn't cross examine...the murder victim? Are you serious?
@@InLieuTube She said specifically who her killer would be, it was within a reasonable period of time before her death, the handwriting can be established as hers, it's addressed to the police...what more would the defense want to ask her? What she had for breakfast the day she wrote it?
The letter shouldnt be withheld. She knew he was a pos and she knew what he was capable of.
This man is guilty.
@@InLieuTube what?
When I said “she new he was a pos and what he was capable of”, I was meaning she sensed she was in some kind of danger, that’s why she wrote the letter to for-worn, if and when something happened to her it was her spouse to go looking for!
Just because you google something doesn’t make it true, consider your sources. It’s been proven over decades that most murders are cause from people you know and are close to you. It’s rare they’re committed by strangers, like kidnappings.
I know all too well about domestic violence and the depravity that goes along with it as well as 💩lawyers who will do anything to get someone off.
Constitution … we only wish it worked that way other wise innocent people wouldn’t be sitting in prison right now all across the country. But hey the guilty need representation too.
Everyone is guaranteed under their fair trial rights to cross-examine any witnesses against them. Her letter was acting as her as a witness against him (as the prosecutor used it). Due to her being unable to attend, they should exclude it due to the inability to cross-examine
That defence seems a little far fetched.
Thank you Court Tv, great casting! Way to go State
00:02 - is this the same judge from the Kyle Rittenhouse case?
yes
I thought the same soon as I seen him, he's just younger...or he looks younger.
Yes!!
It was originally. They changed the judge for this trial.
Unbelievable. That letter was Julie's dying declaration.
I live in Kenosha and if I can get a seat I'm going to this trial. This guy lived next door to my grandparents and I absolutely believe he is guilty.
Why? Because he us serious and you don't like his face?. This is not fair
Too bad Shroeder won’t be back!
Casey Anthony needs one.
Needs one what? A glass of antifreeze? YUP that's what she needs.
Extremely creepy looking to me.
Every time I turn on Court TV this is NOT on. Is it going to shown or not?
It's fascinating how they are trying to find a murdered woman guilty for framing her creep of a husband.
That's the summary of this case after excluding the letter.
Is it live today ?
Jury selection today. Trial to start on Wednesday Jan 11
@@lisanoll3312 thank you 🫶🏻
Why are we wasting time and money on this? It was very obvious without a reasonable doubt that this self-centered man killed his wife.
Right? I’m confused lol. I know it’s because of th letter but still
Isn't a written "will & testament" acknowledged in death?
Julie had available ambien drugs and she could have overdosed, gone to sleep and died. But to take glycol would be way worse, so, I think mark is GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY
I no everything about this man mark Jensen's
I'm from Wisconsin... Didn't know about this one..All evidence should be Enter...To tell the truth and the whole truth. . You better show me All that evidence.. That crazy insane to leave anything OUT...
This would be the case if Freemasons didn't instill Admirality/Maritime law (of the water) in our courts on LAND! We should be using COMMON LAW COURTS using our Bill of Rights and ALL evidence would be presented.
Who’s this
Google
@@Cinder_311 Elon
Back N the days we didn’t have these crazy attachments for life, like the IPhone. Uni, , she didn’t follow the small voice within that spoke to her. Which 😢😮said “ Get to stepping and pass go. I would have moved the F out, and communicated with my local police Department m… I ‘mmmmknow, the whole hindsight is 20/20
I think he is innocent but their toxic relationship made him guilty for some stupid evidences. She had paranoia and she knew that Mark loved another one. She decided to do again something hard against him like when she had sex in his bed with another man, only because Mark was working a lot but she didn't want to work, then someone needed to do. They needed to divorce in 1991 but...for stupid thinking they made their relationship a big fight. And both lost😢 and more their sons.😢.
Mark Jensen is innocent,, the prosecutor seems like a over zealous a,,,,hole