Partition Function

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @MusafirHoonYaro
    @MusafirHoonYaro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Prof. Stuart - you videos are absolutely a class of their own! You are a very effective teacher.

  • @JFBond-zs8xf
    @JFBond-zs8xf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Reviewing a course in statistical thermodynamics taken at McGill 39 years ago, I was having trouble with the partition function. Your lecture made it crystal clear, thank you! I will return to your site.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  ปีที่แล้ว

      Great! I'm glad the video helped. See you next time you need a refresher

  • @atanunath
    @atanunath 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    11:52 you forgot the kT in Exp(Emin/kT) and continued writing just Exp(Emin). Extremely beautiful lecture though, so clear and elegant.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're absolutely right, that is a mistake. I need to fix this lecture to repair that mistake. In the meantime, perhaps your comment can help prevent any confusion for others, so thanks for the correction.

    • @nanakwameafrehsika2905
      @nanakwameafrehsika2905 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PhysicalChemistryI played the video over 50 times thinking to myself where my maths went thanks a lot for ur comment @atanuath I can finally move on and please fixed u been on point until that part

  • @mortezakhoshbin
    @mortezakhoshbin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Beauty of all science is hidden in PChem. Great as other lectures

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hopefully not too hidden! My goals is to make it plain to see.

  • @venuslee2085
    @venuslee2085 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These lectures saved my grade :) Thank you so much

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You put in the work to save your own grade, but I'm happy to have provided an assist.

  • @terminator3598
    @terminator3598 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why did you take the reciprocal of exp(Emin/kT) when you took it out of the summation? Shouldn’t the adjusted partition function be exp(Emin/kT)Q?

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are absolutely right. The adjusted partition function should definitely be exp(+Emin/kT) Q. Thanks for spotting that, and sorry for my sloppy algebra
      (This is an edit to a previous comment. In my prior response, I hadn't watched through my clumsy and erroneous "fixing" of the equation.)

  • @AbRijkeboer
    @AbRijkeboer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your answer to @terminator3598 still leaves me with exactly the same question. The lecture shows an apparent undue sign change (as a second thought correction) effectively leading to the number of accessible states being the summation of Exp(-(Ei + Emin)/kT) rather than Exp(-(Ei - Emin)/kT), taken into account @atanunath below as well. Furthermore, supposedly in the numerator of Pj the exponential term changes to Exp(-(Ej - Emin)/kT)? NB: Excellent video's with very clear examples and explanantions. Many thanks for making these available.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, I see. You're absolutely right. There are a couple of different algebra errors. My math, and my explanation, both got pretty sloppy at the end of this video. I apologize.
      Since
      Q = Σᵢ exp(−Eᵢ / kT)
      but we want to calculate the number of accessible states as (call it Q')
      Q' = Σᵢ exp( −(Eᵢ−Emin)/kT ) = exp(+Emin/kT) Σᵢ exp(−Eᵢ/kT)
      then
      Q' = exp(+Emin/kT) Q
      so if you want to gauge the number of accessible states using the properly calculated partition function when the ground state is not zero, just multiply it by exp(+Emin/kT)
      And yes, if you're changing the zero of energy in one place, you need to do so everywhere you use energies, including in the equation for probability, as you point out

    • @AbRijkeboer
      @AbRijkeboer ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you, also for the vast number of videos you made on high level topics. Very educational. I am a 74 year old chemical engineer (MSc) trying to fresh up and catch up on physical chemistry matters.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AbRijkeboer You're welcome. I'm impressed with your passion for learning!

  • @Afreen891
    @Afreen891 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir please make videos of fermi dirac and bose einsten equations

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the suggestion. Those topics were more advanced than I wanted to include for this course, but they are on the list of videos to record when I go more in depth into stat mech topics.

  • @mortezakhoshbin
    @mortezakhoshbin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think at 13:00 a KT in the denominator is missed in the last equation. Emin/KT

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're absolutely right. Those Boltzmann factors should definitely be exp(-E_min / kT)

  • @itsawonderfullife4802
    @itsawonderfullife4802 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very insightful. thank you prof.

  • @davelochen
    @davelochen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The lectures are excellent and for someone who is just starting PChem, it would be helpful if the order of the playlist could be specified. Thanks.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, glad you like them.
      If you want to start from the very beginning, the very first video in the sequence is the one on Mutually Exclusive Events (th-cam.com/video/vdSWMIh2o_E/w-d-xo.html)
      Each individual playlist should already be in order (don't shuffle!). If you're asking about what order the playlists themselves should be in, I'll add that to the channel's "About" page. Good question / suggestion, thanks!

  • @Ghostrider-ul7xn
    @Ghostrider-ul7xn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you make a Playlist separately for statistical mechanics if there isn't one already? Your lectures are excellent but it would really save my time if you could organize them into one.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The videos are for a physical chemistry course, but it's entirely structured around statistical mechanics (see here for an explanation: th-cam.com/video/PagJqXTDYZg/w-d-xo.html ). So if you start with the first video (th-cam.com/video/OVVcePiou2I/w-d-xo.html ) and go through in order, clicking on the image that pops up at the end of each video, it will walk you through the full course.
      There are also 31 different playlists for different topics / chapters. See the Playlists page for the channel.

  • @lookthesky9632
    @lookthesky9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Professor Steven, may I ask what is difference between partition function and Boltzmann Distribution? I am just confused those terms. Thank you very much.

    • @PhysicalChemistry
      @PhysicalChemistry  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The partition function is the one that is usually labeled Q or q (or sometimes Z). It is the *sum* of a bunch of exponentials. It is kind of a count of how many states are important.
      The Boltzmann distribution (short for Boltzmann probability distribution) tells you the *probability* of being in a particular state. It is usually labeled p_i or something similar. The partition function appears in the denominator of the Boltzmann probability distribution.

    • @lookthesky9632
      @lookthesky9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PhysicalChemistry I really appreciate it!

  • @scuitinos
    @scuitinos ปีที่แล้ว

    Good afternoon Professor, could you explain how I arrived at the Freundlich's isotherm equation? On the other hand, can you comment on which book you recommend to study adsorption? Greetings and thank you very much for your channel, do you have an email to write to you?

  • @strangeWaters
    @strangeWaters ปีที่แล้ว

    I know the footage could be mirrored but I choose to believe that you learned to write backwards to make these videos

  • @nooriips8160
    @nooriips8160 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Indian student like❤

  • @JamesVestal-dz5qm
    @JamesVestal-dz5qm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In STEM, two children or three children might have different genders just like men and women eat different numbers of calories. Women and men have to eat the same number of calories to be equal in science.

  • @luthomampunye497
    @luthomampunye497 ปีที่แล้ว

    2. Consider a system of non-interacting gas particles in a grand canonical ensemble at temperature T = 300 K and chemical potential = 10 kJ/mol. Calculate the partition function (E) for this system.