City Inside/Out hosts debate on upcoming social housing measures

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @BeaverDamFan
    @BeaverDamFan 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Vote yes on 1A! It's time for a new approach and not the council's weak 1B option designed to fail and undermine.

    • @pottati7489
      @pottati7489 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Based!

  • @pottati7489
    @pottati7489 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    It seems like Tiffani is the only one talking facts, she also did a great job pointing out "We're in a housing crisis guys, wtf?", Rachel is constantly lying which is super cringe not to mention BAD, and Roger is somewhere else entirely.

    • @Artagah
      @Artagah วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I completely agree, she made the most sense here and seemed most sincere in her intentions.

  • @RavenDreams
    @RavenDreams 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    1A ALL THE WAY!

  • @DLi-rj9ko
    @DLi-rj9ko 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Vote No and 1B- I agree with the methodology of NOT writing a blank check. Folks its called a hypothesis. If it works - great! We don't have a revenue problem - we have a spending with no ROI problem. And adding additional taxes will not help the city in the long run. Pick up a economics book.

    • @BeaverDamFan
      @BeaverDamFan 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@DLi-rj9ko The "hypothesis" has been tested around the world. This isn't fringe theory, this is a proven solution that has reduced homelessness and rent cost in regions that have implemented it.